Creationist Stumps Evolutionary Professors with ONE Question!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 січ 2020
- Watch the full, free movie of Evolution vs. God HERE: • Evolution vs. God
Visit www.LivingWaters.com to view more free Christian videos, articles, and to get tracts and other resources by Ray Comfort and the Living Waters team.
Look us up on social media…
FACEBOOK
Living Waters: / lwwotm
Ray Comfort: / official.ray.comfort
INSTAGRAM
Living Waters: / livingwatersofficial
TWITTER
Living Waters: / livingwaterspub
Ray Comfort: / raycomfort
Watch the full, free movie of Evolution vs. God HERE: ua-cam.com/video/U0u3-2CGOMQ/v-deo.html
Evolution is not easy to explain and understand, they might not well prepare
Four PhD professors of Evolutionary Biology should be able to give scientific evidence, should they not? And if not, wouldn't that likely mean there isn't any?
Nomoj Nomoj The universe. The alternative is to believe the scientific and impossibility that nothing created everything.
Living Waters - They we’re explaining it, but you left out so many key points in an effort to discredit these professors. Its deceptive, you should know better, you claim your banana speech was edited out of context
I believe we are bending over too far backward to win the atheist.
we are trying to use science vs science to win the debate, which only makes those who absolutely do not want God to start with, to dig in their heels that much harder and look for more worldly wisdom and logical answers to come back in the debate.
Mar 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
Mar 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
that is all we owe the world a true living testimony of our Christlike lives and the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
if they refuse to receive a true witness of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, then that is on them.
as long as we give a true witness of the Gospel of Jesus Christ from the Word of God, it is up to the hearer whether or not to receive or reject the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
we are not instructed to try and win the world with the ways of the world.
Rom 10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Rom 10:14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?
Rom 10:15 And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!
Rom 10:16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report?
Rom 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
faith does not come from demonstrating that we have more true science on our side than they do, faith comes from the Word of God, they will either accept or reject the Gospel message.
1Ti 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
1Ti 6:21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
we are supposed to avoid oppositions of science falsely so called. avoid science not make it the cornerstone of reaching the atheist.
and there will be those in the Christian camp that will reject what I have said because they want to reach the atheist their way instead of God's way using oppositions of science falsely so called.
I appreciate every single one for not getting salty.
It was refreshing!
That is God giving them blind pause. Struggling with it? Ab-solute-ly. And that's cool. No one wants to be wrong or embarrassed. Strongest are the people, who readily admit when they have a change of heart or mind, quickly garnering my respect. And I do also appreciate these brilliant minds giving it thought. Great interviews!!
@@RPMX4 what’s your proof that it was “God”... and which God?
Especially when he clearly didn't understand that evolution isn't a poke'mon thing, its all those anatomical changes accumulating over time! It's not a hard question at all, he's just terrible at asking it, because these people can't grasp how poorly he understands what he's talking about.
@@HEAT3WADEan Looking at the level of complexity in the genetic design = an absolutely genius designer. (A VERY intelligent designer.. God ..)
"Human beings still are fish" Lost all credibility right there.
Haha exactly what I was thinking!!
I’m the only one who lives underwater still? Hhweird.
Maybe he thought the movie Waterworld is real?
Hey that's an expert lol
He should demonstrate. Easily proven with a swimming pool, chain, and 2 cinder blocks.
This interviewer should have finished his school....
"humans beings are fish" there's Darwin for you
@@Angel-Azrael Nope, Fish isn`t a scientific term...but hey thanks for proving you don`t know even basic science.
@@berain-vo9ur there's zero evidence of Darwin evolution.
Tell me you don’t understand evolution. Without telling me you don’t understand evolution
Simple. A human, over millions of years, will become another animal. Just like my Smartphone created itself and fell from the sky.
A potato will become human if you just wait millions of years
@@matthewgordonpettipas6773 it's funny how you guys find it dumb and don't try to understand but when we tell you your has talking snake, talking donkey, born from a virgin, feeding 5000 people...for you it's totally fine...
@@matthewgordonpettipas6773humans will evolve to increase our chances of survival/procreation, but due to the fact that we have created a society, we are removed from things such as needing to be efficient at looking for food/shelter, at the most we will probably evolve more attractive/smart over time
@@LeveltryHere you go..in the end you will still be a human only 😂..you won't become a bird or grow wings and fly 😂..that is the whole point of debate 😂.. changing kind
Nothing is something. Something is nothing. Humans are fish. I’m the King of England.
Since you tell me I believe you. Praise king of England!
and i'm the president of Indonesia 😄😁☺️
@@josemisiego 😄
Hahahahahhaha!!!! Nice! Hilarious!
And I want to be a knight. Please Knight me great king of England
" We are fish." Probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard. He needs our prayers 🙏. They all need to watch The atheist delusion!!!
Hehehe 🤣. Can't stop laughing right. Dumbest saying ever.
Where can we watch it?
We are fish if we believe this delusion.
I’m still stuck on the monkey argument🤷🏼♀️😂(which I don’t really believe completely) and this guys talking about we came from fish
I met an interesting turtle while the song on the radio blasted away
This video basically boils down to: “why haven’t modern scientists witnessed an event that takes millions of years with their own eyes?”
The evidence is in the fossil record, and the small changes that cause evolution of kinds has been observed over and over and over again.
that would also pretty much mean we all happened at random for no reason though; so there's that; "scientist's"... DO NOT KNOW, what happened at the beginning because they're saying they know when they only know like 20 percent of our... known universe? If a kid took a test and only got 20 percent, that's a failing grade btw, it's not even science anymore.
atheism is scientology, both are religions and the same thing btw; no denying that; very materially smart people I guess.
What's the evidence in the fossil record? Ray's not asking for witness accounts he's just asking for any evidence. Evidence in the fossil record would certainly count.
What evidence do you find in the fossil record for there ever being a "change of kinds".
@@Freg-ld2lo There are the transitional fossils between fish and tetrapods like Eusthenopteron, Gogonasus, Panderichthys, Tiktaalik, Acanthostega, Ichthyostega, Pederpes and Casineria. They show a series of stages which become increasingly better adapted for walking than swimming, starting with a rotating shoulder socket in Eusthenopteron (which still had fins), proceeding to the origin of digits on the fins in Panderichthys, the origin of a neck and defined legs on Tiktaalik, and eventually the flattened humerus and other adaptations for permanent life on land seen in true tetrapods like Pederpes and Casineria. I think that counts as a "change of kind," even if "kind" is a nebulous term.
@@dinohall2595 So the fish are still fish?
Also can you link your source so I can look into it further?
Again hypothesis.
Lets use some analogy which moght explain you the mechanism behind evolution.
Two people arguing about evolution of the language. One (person A)argues that the language constantly changes and other (Person B) believes that all languages existed since tower of Babel.
B: Have you ever seen one language change to another?
A: No, every generation use language in unique way, but majority of words are the same. During their lifetime some new words emarge and others are not used so frequently.
B: Have you ever seen Romanian mother give birth to Italian speaking child?
A: No, this is not what evolution of language means. Italian has its path of development and unique future and romanian also. They just share the same ancestor language, which is latin.
B: What is your proof of that?
A: Books from different eras.
B: But this book from 6th century doesnt relly look romanian, it looks more like latin. It also use ony fraction of words, it is incomplete.
A: We have a lot of books from that era.
B: But have you seen one language change to another?
A: First we do not live long enough to observe that, but we see little changes and if you add them together, they made bigger changes. And second, we are the once to decide, how to call what. Now we are calling language in australia english, and language in USA english, but in 1000years we they will be so different from each other that we will simply decide t call the american and australian. One day, people will decide so, but it doesnt mean instant change of the language. The path is long and continuos.
B: Evolution of language is just a theory.
And so on. So do you see it now?
Cool explanation, unfortunately the idiots who need to hear this won't be able to comprehend any of this.
That's not a good explanation of evolution though, is it?
Let's make it 'evolutionary'
A Romanian book has a change of words brought about by accident. so, the word for cat accidently changes into a meaningless word like brisr.
This happens repeatedly until a book that once said 'a cat sat on a mat' now says 'g brisr ftus nerf shtyr dfurn'
There's no mechanism in place that correct these 'mutations' they just happen, and are said to improve the language by a process of natural selection.
Someone called Charlie Darling then says, that the book that reads 'g brisr ftus nerf shtyr dfurn' once said 'the cat sat on a mat' so someone says well show us the evidence for that.
People laugh at him and say, surely you know that languages develop, but he replies, yes, I know that they do, but they do so using intelligent thought processes, but you are claiming it was a series of random accidents that produced an entirely new and sophisticated language.
Yes, you reply, and if you don't agree, you must be dumb.
A) we don't live anywhere near long enough, nor will any species of human, probably, to observe a single example of a beneficial mutation resulting in a new KIND/TYPE of animal. We will continue witnessing speciation in all it's forms, however. This is not the crucial aspect of evolution.
B) you're describing speciation. The vast changes that can occur in the realm of "language" (meaning : the sounds humans make to communicate).
Darwinian evolution in this sense would be some humans beginning to communicate telepathically, or making the noises through some other part of their body, etc.
Phenomenal analogyy
Very good. How extraordinary to find someone who actually get's it in this comments section!
This was me as an atheist. I look back and laugh now at how stupid these arguments are.
COMPLETELY! STUPID!!! I was the same way for 15 years and I honestly cant believe how much faith I had in "Scientists"
@@JohnnyAnderson1 , don't even remind me. I was a researcher as an undergraduate. I can't tell you the amount of times I saw people skewing their data results 😬🤫😂
If you get tell them brooooo🖐️
I know right?! HAHAHA! I was the same.
That was me. What a fool I was.
"Human beings are fish" - Employed university professor
obviously he means all animals including humans evolved from fish
@@rileysmall4317 We evolved from humans.
@@acelinomckinzie1956 incorrect. I honeslty dont understand why there's contention over this issue. it's like telling a child santa clause isnt real.
And tons of high school teachers poisoning our kids' minds.
@@rileysmall4317 No, your Illuminati conspiracy theories are really detrimental to society. No evidence that we evolved from such fish. Demonstrate a human evolving from a fish.
I love how none of these questions stump anyone
You clearly did not watch the entire video.
@@healthydog1 I did. Did you watch the unedited interviews?
Here's a question that stumps creationists. If the stars and earth are the same age (give a few days) then why can we see stars that are billions of light years away when the earth is only 6000 years old?
@@manmanderson It really stumps me. How can someone be so ignorant about the creationism. From where did you get that information?
@@mathburn5966 do you believe the way the Bible explains the creation of the universe?
"We have thousands of examples."
"Just give me one."
"Uh" . . .
"evolution is a fact"
-said everyone without giving any evidence
evolution is also a religion
Ray knows what he is doing. There is no "observable" evidence of a change in "kinds". Both observable and kinds are defined by him. There is fossil evidence of changes in "kinds" and there is "observable" evidence for a change in genetically and observably different species.
@@jake8286 all we can observe from a fossil is that they are dead. You need to use your imagination for the connection.
@@jake8286 Change within species has always been a thing. What he is talking about is the basis of macro evolution. Changes between kinds. Example: Birds turning into fish. Evolutionists think that because they can observe micro evolution, they can't deduce that macro evolution is a thing. But it's not.
"Professing themselves wise, they became fools."
Well stated
Very good! If I remember correctly that was said by Paul in the Book of Romans. It's been a while but that would be my guess.
professing themselves too lazy to learn the science they resort to bronze age insults. Grow up and read some books.
Shawn - Hey guess what, wisdom teeth are proofs of Unintelligent Design. “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools” is a sophistry which deceived Young Earth Creationist puppets keep telling themselves in order to deny scientific facts and scientific evidence in favor of their make-believe fairytale.
“Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools”, what a coincidence that Muslims also regurgitate a similar statement in order to disregard Christians.
When it comes to a genuine scientific debate, Old Earth Creationists like Dr Hugh Ross can win against Young Earth Creationist con men like Ray Comfort any day. That’s gotta be hurt.
Shawn - (Jeremiah 20:7) You deceived me, LORD, and I was deceived; you overpowered me and prevailed. I am ridiculed all day long; everyone mocks me.
You deceived Young Earth Creationist puppets keep having fun worshipping a Great Deceiver.
Ray Comfort really does make rocks look very intelligent.
Not only that, he makes rocks look *honest* too.
I'll take Ray Comfort over Professor Dave.
Of course the creationist has his own definition of evolution, of course the wrong one. He is waiting for crocoducks...
"Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the Truth." 2 Tim 3:7
Brother, you cannot expect those blinded by their biases & supported by "science" to reconsider their position when you project the wrong message. Please read 2Tim 2:24-26.
@@surrealcereal948
Not when BIASED SCIENTISTS LIE about evolution!!!! We NOW KNOW that it wasn't DARWINIAN EVOLUTION that caused the features in Darwin's finches beaks...it was PREPROGRAMMED DNA CODE. The code was already in the finches and was EPIGENETICALLY repressed or expressed....that is ADAPTATIONS...not NEW INFORMATION. The bacteria they BELIEVE evolved have NEVER produced a single novel protein....with TRILLIONS of offspring in the longest study ever...not a single NOVEL PROTEIN. They have shown incredible functionality using the code already available....but never evolving...not even ONE example....no not one....
But yet...you BELIEVE....by BLIND FAITH and not UNASSUMED OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE....science!!! The irony of your BLIND IGNORANT FAITH is DELICIOUS!!!! The largest DNA study ever DISPROVED evolution and the story was buried....it's Hilarious that everyone has heard a fake story of bacteria on a petri dish that DIDN'T show evolution or ANY SETS OF POSITIVE SUCCESSIVE MUTATIONS....not ever....But no one has heard that DNA HAS DESTROYED any chance that evolution is true....and yet...the silly BELIEVERS in evolution fight against SCIENCE and FACTS!!! How sad for them! Its like watching cocky children describe how they know the tooth fairy is true...she isn't....nor is her sister...the natural selection fairy. Both are EASILY DEBUNKED by ACTUAL EVIDENCE.
@@mihaicolceriu-nicola7148
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Notice how you CAN'T even produce one single SCIENTIFIC PAPER devoid of FAITH statements!!! Evolution and ABIOGENESIS are both FAITH BASED ASSUMPTIONS that carry the weight of RELIGIOUS fervor and Dogma. What they don't carry is scientifically observable evidence!!! And that is exactly why I stopped believing in both. It's the science of it stupid!!! You would know that if you actually studied the subject and had any brains!!! And that is why I laugh at you silly people!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
DNA CODE is the MOST SOPHISTICATED and COMPLEX and VOLUMINOUS CODE ever assembled. It is so Advanced of anything mankind has ever attempted that it makes Microsoft Windows look like a joke! You idiots don't understand that because you don't code. And you biased people don't care if it is code because eliminating Evolution makes you butt-hurt!!!🤣🤣🤣 it isn't about the science for you people. It's all about the emotional neediness for a Godless universe. So instead of presenting any evidence for your silly claims, you begin the character attacks, straw man arguments, the false incredulity, and questioning of Sanity or brains. And yet still... I never get a single scientific paper showing any Evolution or a biogenesis devoid of FAITH statements within it! We now have proof that DNA shows we are designed. If we didn't have that proof, I would still be an evolutionist moron! Nothing in the scientific record shows that evolution is the cause of species on the planet. The largest DNA code study ever found just the opposite. You didn't know that because you don't study like I do.
You WILLFULLY IGNORE ALL ACTUAL EVIDENCE in favor of FANTASY STATEMENTS and naturalist IMAGININGS. It's Hilarious!! You ONLY accept that which can be supported by FAITH...not OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Now watch folks as this BIASED idiot CAN'T even produce one SCIENTIFIC paper devoid of FAITH statements!!!! How OBVIOUS!!!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@jonney tango
Jesus said FATHER. You LIED. Jesus is God's Son. You silly people come along and try to erase history instead of looking for TRUTH. The English language had nothing to do with the original books of the Bible furthermore learning does not lead to Salvation! Only confessing Jesus as Lord through FAITH... BELIEVING... leads to Salvation. Repentance is what BELIEVERS ALWAYS DO when they know who Jesus is. But LORDSHIP is the FAITH that Christ Jesus speaks of unshakable Belief that throws your own life away in acceptance of Jesus Christ's Lordship over your life. It has zero to do with religion or a church. It is simply true and written in God's Word. No "version" of the Bible can change what God's Word says. Read the Greek, the Hebrew and Aramaic texts. You are mistaken.
@jonney tango
So WHAT RELIGION THEN DO YOU FOOLISHLY FOLLOW...And by all means show us the HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS PROVING what you said!!! Oh...that's right...you CAN'T!!! Just another nutjob looking to recruit others imto his cult!!! Sad.
The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good. psalm 14:1
Amen
I just can't fathom how incredibly smart people (supposedly) can be so incredibly stupid.
@@dreamcazman I cant fathom how irrational it is to *not* to believe. Thats excatly what David was calling out when writing these psalms.
..."professing to be wise, they became fools"..Romans 1:22..
How 'bout THIS one?
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. Even as fools walk along the road, they lack sense and show everyone how stupid they are."
(Ecclesiastes 10:2-3 NIV)
Hopefully they'll wake up someday?
This brings me physical pain.
@Olia Krist Because the questioner is stupid
@Olia Krist because the kid who is asking these idiotic question is not genuine.
I know, its from all the face palming I do with these flerfs.
@Olia Krist Maybe you should ask, "What is thinking?"
@Olia Krist Are you saying you are the only person allowed to post on YT, and who is L Martin? Zero for 2 means you need to keep playing in order to score.
Hey Ray, just prove god did it and finally settle the matter already!
I think this would be a worthwhile video if you actually let the entire conversation play through without cutting it to make it look like you "beat them".
Jesus, listen all you people who think that this video is anything else but an idiotic attempt at manipulating interviewees and then manipulating the montage of the video as to make them look bad:
The interviewer here makes a distinction between „evolution” and „darwinian evolution”. There is no such difference. It’s not like there is a „kind” of evolution that makes organisms better fit for their environment, and there’s another „kind” of evolution that makes animals go from one species to another.
Both these „evolutions” are the same.
If you change the genetic structure of an organism long enough, after some time it will become irrecognisable.
It’s just that specific changes within a species can be observed over shorter periods of time, and the interspecies one (because it is the result of genetic mutations accumulating ON TOP of each other) can only be observed over gargantuan periods of time.
It’s really not that hard.
@@guciowitomski3825 yeah its a shame. These are the people that don't believe we are having a global environmental problem
Oh - yes, he beat them I assure you. And he did it using the scientific method.
@Psicólogo Miguel Cisneros Yes! I agree with you sir! By their own standard - they are defeated. Do you understand my line of thinking? A Christian does not even need to go into their own Theological Arguments. The opponent’s argument does not meet its own standard!
@Psicólogo Miguel Cisneros Bacteria evolving anti-bacterial resistance
I found the change man has been looking for, my dog was a democrat but now he's a republican.
so ..... now he buys his own food? makes his own bed? & got a job?
Your dog is a democrat. You can see his Biden pin when he lifts his tail.
lol
@@chuckufarley8513 do democrats have other people buy them food and take care of them? And are all the democrats you know unemployed? When was the last time you even talked to a democrat instead of arguing online? What damage have democrats _really_ done that directly affects _your_ life? Can you explain this more please? In an idiot and I want to make sure I understand.
No that's DEvolution
He didn't "stump" any of them..he is the one who can't think nor comprehend their reactions
"Human beings are still fish." 1:32
@@michaelmartin3943 it's a weird question, because how are you supposed to find the cut off? It's like looking at the visible spectrum. Can one draw a line from where yellow changes to green? No. So, it's a stupid question.
@@michaelmartin3943 It has been proven that we still have fish DNA. As long as we have fish DNA, we are still fish. Maybe you should take some biology classes so you can understand that.
Why can’t you say that fish have human DNA and fish are humans?
@@richardeldridge8335 Because fish are older than humans.
Ray Comfort has never stumped anyone, I promise you.
So no one in this before with no answer was stumped… 🤣 I’m stumped
@@user-jd4lk7jy9m I heard it all already: I know god personally along with a billion other people on earth. There’s more than enough evidence to find god if you want to. If you don’t you will rationalize yourself out of it. It’s on you fam. No skin off my back
I'm not a biologist but I play one on TV. And when I'm stumped by Dudley Moore clones I just drink more.
@@rightsidetv4235thats called schizophrenia
@@rightsidetv4235"more than enough evidence"? Where exactly? Nobel prize if you demonstrate it!
I guess you don’t realize that when science doesn’t have an answer to something it doesn’t just make something up lol
that's why you turn to philosophy
Therefore a creator created something.
@@philipseballos8892 What a Herculean leap in logic. 😂
I loved the fact after getting schooled by professional scientists they turned to kids .
do you understand what observe , repeat, test meanim the context of science?. Yep nope. When it is said observe it is meant to observe the evidence and repeat that observation and test that evidence and the observation method It doesn't mean see it in real time. Like just because you didn't see the murder happened and only the dead body doesn't mean the murder didn't happen. You can see the blood the dead body and the weapon. Hence the fossil record.
This entire ' documentary ' is stupid parade
It does it calls it evolution
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools..."
One kind evolving into another kind? The 'Wise' becoming 'Fools'. Two kinds. But is it by 'design'???
@@a.lavernefilan1888 litterly said professing they just became more foolish like no one is wise exept God he just let us have the ability to learn and sum peps use it agaisnt him
@@deandreayton9754 Considering your spelling, I don't think it takes a god to be wiser than you are.
@@johnjamele bore ring, carri onn wit ur lyfe x
@david mullen "Kind" is a weasel word with no value in science; it's used by people like Comfort and Ken Ham to hand-wave evolution.
The students were more thoughtful and honest than the professors.
The students are still using their minds. The professors gave up their thoughts to feed the narrative.
My thought on this rather obvious disparagy between the two groups is evidence that the professors were in an agitated state of trying to defend a "foundational" theory that actually has a striking absence of defendable evidence!
They don't get BIG money for pushing this crap.
I noticed that too.
Interesting observation and quite right !
This whole video is just you having a lack of understanding of what biological evolution is
why do you edit your videos to make those you disagree with look stupid?
Because it's propaganda.
Humans are “fish”. This is pure foolishness because even a child won’t admit that he or she is a fish.
They are claiming this due to the outdated graph in old biology classrooms showing the different stages of the human fetus because at one stage the developing baby resembles a fish "shape".
@@quasimobius That's so stupid 😂😂😂 o my gosh
There are no fossil records that support darwinian evolution till this day
If you want to successfully understand how they form this argument to convince them you need to see their point, not necessarily agree with it. They look at common development trait. They claim the structure of weight bearing arms and legs is the proof of development over very long times. The don't claim a fish today was a human tomorrow. I would argue their point by explaining it like a bubble. Why does a bubble take the form of a sphere? Because it's the most efficient and stable shape. So wouldn't it stand to reason a creator would design along a similar principal.
HAHAHA I LAUGH A LOT WHEN I HEARD ''HUMANS ARE FISH'' 😂😂 I STILL LAUGH HAHA.
Here we have a man who says "humans are fish" without blinking. That's an automated response, not a considered one.
Once he starts saying we are still bacteria is when you really have to worry
@@auggieeasteregg2150 🤣
He's brainwashed
He is not brainwashed. What he means is that we have a common ancestor with fish
What he meant was: We used to be fish, but got fed up swimming underwater (Can't breathe!)
1:02 "The scientific method must be observable and repeatable".
That's not how I understood it, I thought that only observations and scientific experiments must be repeatable.
I loved the fact after getting schooled by professional scientists they turned to kids .
do you understand what observe , repeat, test meanim the context of science?. Yep nope. When it is said observe it is meant to observe the evidence and repeat that observation and test that evidence and the observation method It doesn't mean see it in real time. Like just because you didn't see the murder happened and only the dead body doesn't mean the murder didn't happen. You can see the blood the dead body and the weapon. Hence the fossil record.
This entire ' documentary ' is stupid parade
@@celestialsatheist1535 Yep, in the case of fossils it would be something like: 'We found fossils', can we find more? What have we learned from these fossils? Can we make some predictions based on these findings? (For example, we predicted where more fossils would be, or what previously undiscovered fossils would look like, which we later actually found).
@@celestialsatheist1535 Excuse me. They did not ''get schooled'' by the professional scientists. The scientists who believe in evolution have not observed it happening. They have to assume it happened without any conclusive evidence. They have not found any transitional fossils because there are none. But they say We're still looking for the evidence and one day we will find it. That is an unprovable assumption and not science. The problem atheists have is that they don't want there to be a God because if He exists (which He does) they are answerable to Him and they don't want to be. Without faith in God people are in deep trouble.
More accurate title, Creationist doesn`t understand basic science and leaves actual scientists confused on how someone can be so ignorant in a world where you have access to all the information in the world at your fingertips.
Absolute bollocks, mate. He asked them all and they couldn't give him a proper answer. Don't be disingenuous
@@thehumblepotatoreborn9313 evolution didn't happen in days or months it took a huge time scale . But if it's wrong feel free to show me an example for creationism where it was created with example
@@Premium2023oct I like how your reply has absolutely to do with what I said. and also, I never said I was a creationist - I was just criticizing op for talking sh1t. By all means. though, go off.
@@Premium2023oct- I think you're absolutely right.
My car as we know it evolved over millions of years from ore dead prehistoric animals and other evolutionary matter.
The car I bought has no name on it. No model or serial number, so obviously it evolved over millions and millions of years as there is no way to trace its origin.
I use it on my farm since it can't be licensed because it evolved over these last millions or so years!
@@Premium2023oct-as well, creation happens with an example. just about everything man puts his hand on as well the heavens and earth started with an example.
"Humans are fish". Possibly the most stupid thing I've ever heard.
So Jesus is stupid for saying come with me and i will make you fishers of men?
@@poeticdesigns8893 In one case the word "fish" is a noun, the other a verb.
@@poeticdesigns8893 Yeah... He was talking about evangelism.
@@poeticdesigns8893 wow.
Congratulations.
🤣🤣
Jason Brown I thought I misheard that but still remained the same even after rewinding the video 🤣
"Human beings are fish"
--Quote from an evolutionist genius
🤭🤭🤭
Soon as I heard that I went looking for this comment! Haha!
in the womb you have gills
@Christian Bear haekel's drawings was proven to be a fraud.
Mike Bennett evolution decides humans are evolved from pond scum.
@@john6291 That was proven wrong long ago. I recommend googling more thoroughly before you post.
I get it, it's difficult to think on a geologic time scale and it's a hard thing to accept that you are an animal, that you have a common ancestor with other animals and that you're not the final end goal of all creation.
No one can give you an example of a time when a certain animal was one way one day and *pop* became a an entirely different thing the next day because it doesn't work like that.
Your last sentence is a strawman. Darwinian Evolution is the idea that all life arose from one common ancestor. We don't want canines to one day "pop" into something else. We just want something one can test, observe, and repeat to show that canines can bring forth something that is not a canine. Without information being added to the genome countless times over, you can't go from molecules to man.
@@LivingWaters it wasn't a straw man because some people do have the belief that animals come into being instantly.
I only said that because I heard someone else say that just the other day.
You're asking me to demonstrate, test and repeat a process that happens over millions of years... a tall order indeed but I think I can deliver.
If you think of the Earth itself as a laboratory and all of history as your sample size, the fossil record absolutely shows that organisms change gradually over time.
I'll go straight for the jugular, numerous hominid species have been found and they show gradual change over time.
Hell you can look at old photographs and you can see that people look very different from the way they used to.
I grew up in a religious household so I understand that the fact that you are an animal is a difficult thing to accept.
I know the mental blocks that are conditioned into you as a child, that you enforce yourself.
I know the existential dread that God is going to reject you from heaven if you think too much about this topic and you won't see your family again.
But I'm an honest Man and I'm not going to pretend to believe in it.
Darwinism is true and once you see it you can't unsee it.
It's everywhere, look at the bugs in your backyard and you will see the Eternal arms race of predator and prey.
You say evolution is impossible because you can't create new information or add new information.
Well I'll tell you what's impossible.
You can't come up with a reasonable response to an irrational sentence like that.
"you can't create or add new information"
I don't know what you mean by that and quite frankly I don't think you know either.
It's called sophistry, it's a debate tactic where you just spout nonsense to confuse people and it was actually banned in ancient Athens.
@@LivingWaters hey, that doesn't mean that there's not a God that's not the point of what I'm trying to say.
I just want for us to understand more about the mechanisms of biology and geology.
Re: "animal was one way one day and pop became a an entirely different thing the next day because it doesn't work like that." -- It does in politics.
@@VictorianTimeTraveler that’s micro evolution. No one is denying it’s existence. It’s all around us, as you’ve said. But evolution on the macro, is to this day still unproven. It is BELIEVED to be that way, but there’s absolutely no evidence of it. We have to assume, which is not scientific. There’s nothing wrong with that, it’s just that we can’t pretend to think we know macro evolution is a fact, when we can’t prove it. What is scientific for example, is the experiment of Louis Pasteur. Life can only emerge from life. For example, birds are said to have evolved from reptiles, but not a single "half-plumaged, half-winged" fossil has been found so far. Then there’s the orphan genes, and many other interesting stuff to think about… imo, you have to have much more blind faith to believe in completely random events of chaos leading to such complex life with no additional interruptions to reset the entire process, than at least entertain the idea of a possibility of intelligent design behind everything. I mean, the odds are so freaking unbelievably crazy, you better tell me you’re playing the lottery lol
Christian Student of biology here. The fact you are missing is that the Macroevolucion is a result of the acumulation of Microevolution events. The only thing we can (nowadays) proove in laboratorys is microevolution, macroevolution is a much complex and longer process. Anyway, if you can proove microevolution then macroevolution its around the corner. Its all about the fantastic world of genetics.
So you're saying you're assuming microevolutions end up as macroevolutions. Or that's the prevailing faith right now?
If change is observable on a small scale it's evolution. Or maybe it's God? Perhaps the reason why there aren't fossils of a myriad of different skeletons between species isn't because it took so long for it to happen. But because God made the major distinctions himself? The apparent dating on some fossils which were 'tectonically' shifted to the top of Everest is millions of years. So if we have fossils millions of years old then why don't we have a proven gradual change between major distinctions of animals? Just unlucky I guess.
So, we just assume it happens?
The scientist says to God - “We can make a man from the earth just like you have” Gods reply “ FIND YOUR OWN SOIL!”
CHECK MATE!
Underrated comment
why are we carbon based, but the dust would have been silicone based!
Amen
MIC DROP!!!!!! GOD IS GOOD!!
I've heard this joke before. Always funny.
Professing to b wise , they became fools.
Nailed it!!
Very true!
Professor
That’s exactly right. It is foolishness with GOD.
They said we used to have tails but got rid of it because we didn't need it. What?! Can you imagine how cool and useful it would be to have a tail to open doors when you're hands are full, to multitask better, etc
Define “kind”. Evolution proceeds through a time scale you cannot imagine.
Clever editing wins (or loses) any video debate 😇.
The interviewer is so misinformed. Hard to watch this nonsense
The question is a straw man.
Evolution doesn't involve one species producing a fundamentally different kind of organism. Each new species is just a slightly modified version of the preceding species.
There is no such thing as a change in kinds. Evolution doesn't even teach that it's possible.
It's like asking to see species A produce species Z WITHOUT even producing species B first.
If one species produced a completely different kind it would disprove evolution immediately because it violates laws of evolution. Specifically the Law of Monophyly.
And there's no such thing as "kind" in biological classification.
The question can only be answered by pointing out how stupid the question is.
Was my comment too complicated for you to understand?
Evolution doesn't involve one thing changing into a completely different type of thing. It's the all time number one creationist straw man.
Dude. A scientific theory is not the same as a theory in the colloquial sense of the word. What you might call a theory in everyday language is closer to a hypothesis in scientific terms.
If something has been demonstrated to be true then it stops being a hypothesis and is elevated to the level of a scientific theory.
A scientific theory is the explanation for a particular subject that has already been effectively shown to be fact
The subject matter of a scientific theory is fact, the scientific theory explains why. For example:
Germs are a fact. The Germ Theory of Disease explains why germs are a fact.
Cells are a fact. Cell Theory explains why cells are a fact.
Gravity is a fact. The Theory of Gravity explains why gravity is a fact.
The big bang is a fact. You can literally detect the big bang with a good enough radio telescope.
The Big Bang Theory explains why the big bang is a fact.
It doesn't even make sense to reject a scientific theory because they've already been proven to be true.
It's like saying you don't believe in atoms because Atomic Theory is just a theory.
Legitimate question. Do you have a learning disability or are you just thick?
There are 30,000 plus scientific papers on the subject including hundreds of examples of observed evolution, dozens of examples of observed macroevolution, thousands of different evolution experiments, thousands of transitional fossils, dozens of beneficial mutations and mutations adding new information.
I'm a Christian and a biology student. Bacteria are far more diverse than other forms of life if you look closely. Acquiring new metabolic pathways can be a huge change- that's like comparing plants and animals.
The reason we don't see change of kind on our own timeline is because we haven't been around long enough.
You are a fool if you believe that. Biologists have no say when it comes to creation. The beginning of the universe is pure prebiotic chemistry and has nothing to do with biology. As far as we know biology exists on planet earth only.
@@zapharian6114 Are you serious? There are plants and living beings on other planets? How are those planets called? Education level: zero
@@brilliantbeaches5389 I'm sorry, are you saying that we can't learn about the origins of life by studying living things?
The origins of life are biochemical. Who do you think decides these scientific questions if not biochemists, geochemist, and biologists?
Also, the origins of the universe is a physics question, not a chemistry question.
@@jacksonhall5725 Chemistry and physics. Although chaos can never cause order. We don't have a single example for that.
That reason we don't see a change of kind is because there is no observable scientific evidence for change of kind over supposedly millions and 100s millions of years of records.
I think the confusion here is that a lot of the evolutionary biologists think that by “kind” creationists mean “species”, when they actually mean something closer to “family” or “class”. If they were to word things that way, the answers would change drastically.
i am no scientist but i think ray wants to know can an organism of one species evolve into an organism of another species such as a prokaryote evolving into a fish which evolves into an ape which evolves into a human
@@ccnationnews5965 The definition of evolution is “a change in the frequency of alleles in a population.” So the answer to the question is no, an organism cannot evolve into a different species. Evolution, by definition, can only occur at the population level. Only a population can evolve into another species.
@@ccnationnews5965 I did one search and found a fossil record of a dog looking animal slowly turning into a whale. Not to common of knowledge, but it should answer his question.
@@ccnationnews5965bateria didnt evolve into fish. They evolved into a bigger bacteria with a weapon, then into a bacteria eating thing. Then into a bigger and more complex thing.
I just dont get hie a cell comes together.
@@GhostScout42 Hard to understand at first glance. It took me reading numerous books to get the gist of it. But over millions (and even 3.8 billion) of years lots of changes happen.
I am Muslim and a firm believer in god. I think that the argument that "we should be able to recreate and observe macro evolution in a lab" is very week and contradictory to my beliefs. It is contradictory because I believe in the big bang theory and I am not really aware of a way to recreate it in a lab and observe it.
The general norm of the scientific method is to observe and experiment but we also need to realize that there are some things we can't recreate in a lab and must rely on other sources of evidence. That doesn't make those evidence weak.
We must be rational and logical.
Ray, you can't just use the word "kind" and think it means something to a biologist. Define YOUR meaning for it.
He did. And the scientists clarified to make sure they understood. Multiple times.
@@CaliforniaFarmGirl sharks and gold fish are both fishes does that mean they are not different species
@@CaliforniaFarmGirl Could you indicate at what point he mentions the definition of the word "kind"?
He literally did
@@jacksack1864 But at what point in the video? Could you indicate at what point in the video he did it?
Fish are exempt from having to pay taxes. That could be his motive!
Hmmmm? If I could only convince the IRS that i'm a fish!
@@kevingouldrup9265 Simple - just identify as a fish. Better still, identify as a lower-income person and get free goodies from the gov't. And don't forget the check box for 'blind', you'll get some more $$ there too.
Lol! My coffee just came out my nose!
When the IRS finds that he isn't a fish they'll make him walk the plank. He'll be ok though, because he's a fish. However, being human also, he might not be able to swim. How did some humans loose the ability to swim, given they're fish, and mostly water?
@@henryhudson1297 it’s called being a mermaid.
Have you ever witnessed a river change it’s course? Gotchya! See that proves rivers don’t change their course
Some common sense in a sea of ignorance
yes, the oxbow lakes are no proof at all!!!!!! /s
must be Moses from the bible
@@vm8886 Rivers do move, naturally, literally wolves can move rivers, and dirt can move rivers.... oxbow lakes are definitive proof, even if you discount that we've seen it occur......
@@Sentraxion I was being sarcastic my guy
This video shows that people who believe in fantasies are not willing to engage in actual debate. Religion is not an institution, it's a social tool, rather. I'm willing to bet that anyone who is promoting religion out there is benefitting financially from it.
This breaks my heart and makes me very sad☹️. I wish they knew how deceived they are. Please brothers and sisters let's be compassionate in our comments, remember who the real enemy is.
For time is running out... For the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God. Sanctify them through thy truth : thy Word is truth. Amen
Amen I just wish they wouldn't teach it as fact to kids they grow up atheists saying science proves evolution which is a lie.
@@elsablue3646 For like unto... Lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world and not after Christ. Amen
@@scottheld4837 amen brother
Amen. God's love doesn't shine through when we cut people's honest thoughts down.
People are fish? I must have missed that lesson hahahaha .....
Something tells me you missed a lot of lessons to become so willful ignorant
@@walterdaems57 so says who ? You ? Bahaha
@@jesusischrist1527 did just talking fish said something to you? it must be hungry. matthew4:19 ...Jesus said, “and I will make you fishers of men.” in the bible...1john 5:12 He who has the Son has life, he who does not have the Son of God does not have life. therefore their theory only applies to themselves. they can be fish, cat, bactaria etc., pretty much anything they can imagine. we know how great God’s grace is by observing evolutionist telling us that we are no better beings than bactaria. yes, we were once dust of the earth but by the love of Yaweh through Jesus Christ gave us life to live as His children. not only that, He also gave us hope to live forever with Him in His kingdom. how wonderful and amazing is that.
@@user-ct5qp3os1h amen brother amen ... We are fishermen of men brother thats an awesome way of looking at this fish people science theory 😄 😁😁👍👍👍 thank you and I totally agree with you with everything you said 👍👍👍be blessed my friend in spite of all that is happening and especially all that us happening in this world in Jesus Christ's mighty name ... 🙏🙏🙏
@@jesusischrist1527 amen. May God bless you in every way and thought.
Shortest video Ray Comfort 😂 has ever done, One guy, one guy had the correct answer, the chemist, God Bless You Ray, God Bless All ❤
Im not 100% sure what the interviewer means by "change of kind", but for whatever standard he uses for kind. You e.g. got the evolution of cetaceans, or whales which is the laymans term. They evolved from Pakicetus which lived on land 50 million years ago, which got fossile records of their their land based form 50 million years until their more sea based form 20 - 30 million years ago, and their form today which is still living in the ocean.
There is a creator, his name is God, Alfa & Omega, beginning and end, etc.
E-Rock alpha
Lloyd Christmas morning yes thank you. Sorry.
Worried you were gonna say allah, Muhammads puppet god who he used as an excuse to marry 30 wives yet his followers only 5
His Name is Yahweh! The Father of Yeshua!
E-Rock amén.
They are so confused they don’t know what they even actually believe.
They believe in Nothing.
EarthtoSpiritWarrior - True that. Science actually started with Monks in monasteries to better understand our relationship-with God, not to “disprove” him. Only in this last couple centuries have the mainstream turned away from the belief in the Almighty. I thought I was busted flat after a recent vehicle vs road sign in the middle of the Highway, totaled my car. I was all kinds of mad, sad, and confused, then it hit me, I have been asking for help getting ride of that car for something better. Then it hit me, Insurance paid 3x every other offer I had ever gotten on the car, huh, AMEN!!! The Lord works in mysterious ways. We have to give it to the Lord, he is guiding us as we speak. I’m very excited!!!
@@jarrodmazzacca1911
When I was an agnostic , my wife divorced me . Six months later , I sat in the dark with a knife to my wrists. Every time I closed my eyes , I saw my children (who were then 8 and 5) dressed in black and holding hands. I knew that is how they would look at my funeral. Eventually I threw the knife in the corner and cried myself to sleep.
Five years later I was born again in Jesus name !
Now I sometimes get visions when I pray.
God speaks , but too many listen to the devil.
In their case, the god of this age has blinded the minds of the unbelievers so they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.
2 Corinthians 4:4 HCSB
@@lancetschirhart7676
Satan is your enemy.
Until you get that , see your sin and see Jesus as the saviour of sinners , what more can I say ?
Hell is for the fallen angels and those who refuse to trust in the cross of Christ , instead believing the lies of the devil.
@@jarrodmazzacca1911
Roman Catholicism is not Christianity. Maybe your gran was a believer who couldn't leave RC and let down her family. I hope she made it , but you need to seek the truth in Jesus Christ , not religion.
Mankind is evil , God calls us to love , but many refuse.
You stand cursed by your unbelief , the cross is the only way out , I hope you know that one day.
Jesus is not of this world , king of heaven . Seek him or not , it's your choice.
I'm so glad I know the Lord ❤️✝️
Humans haven't been around long enough to "see" evolution, but the fossil record proves it, indubitably. And artificial selection (eg dog breeds) proves the mechanism.
They’re still dogs
Transitional fossils are few and far between, and dog-breeding is micro-evolution - not macro - which he's asking the people about
Poor people why can't they tell him that such a change does not happen in a moment infront of one's eyes but in millions of years . He should go to the museum of archeology/evolution
These intellectuals are full of pride, the kind of pride that doesn’t allow for God.
@@LWS1989 What critical thinking doesn’t allow for God.
@@LWS1989 What about the origin of the universe? How did a universe explode into being from nothing?
@@LWS1989 Possible, but Einstein determined that time, space, and energy are co-relative, meaning they came to exist at the same instant. There cannot be any other explanation because of the fact that nothing material or temporal existed before the Big Bang.
@@jacobjenkins5941 maybe there was elements not organized to make the base of things, like carbon molecules, and God being omniscient and omnipotent (and his power and glory is knowledge) organized the elements. If we, as human beings, within just a fraction of time compared to the earth's age, were able to understand and study genetic engineer, for example, why not the Creator?
@@cristinafonseca4684 He did make everything, exactly. I am a Christian. My argument was that because Space, Time, and Matter all came to exist at the same moment, there clearly was a Creator.
Ha ha ha! I like how the professors looked at Ray Comfort as though he just couldn't _grasp_ the scope of their "wisdom" or the ENORMITY of their "evidence." Confront them with the circular "logic" of their "geological column" and watch them stomp off, fuming.
_It really_ is _easier to fool a person than it is to convince them they've been fooled._
Pride, the original sin. Nothing new under the sun.
But Ray actually can't grasp evolution and it's obvious, his questions don't make sense and he demonstrates his ignorance of biology.
@RetroMan He clearly does not understand evolution by his use of the word "kind" and the many times he said "but it's still a fish".
@@scientificmethod1409 you know for a fact that dog cant produce a horse,rat wont make a cow and rabbit wont produce a hippopotamus. Cat produce a cat,fly produce a fly and mosquito will produce a mosquito, there are no exceptions. Mutations are bad for everyone and adaptation still happens within the same kind. Losing a part of body is bad and not good.
@@scientificmethod1409
But the stickleback IS a fish . There would need to billions of "missing links" for man to have evolved from fish . We have zero evidence . Therefore the evolutionist requires faith .
I know Christians who are evolutionists though . You can believe in billions of years and that Jesus Christ is Lord .
@@MrBilioner I don't even know what your point is, nothing you said invalidates evolution in the slightest .
March 5, 1616- The Holy Office of the Inquisition published its verdict on the new scientific ideas of Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo. It read:" The idea that the Earth goes around the Sun is Foolish, Philosophically Erroneous and Heretical since it contradicts Holy Scripture. The idea that the Earth revolves on its axis is also Ridiculous and Heretical." Galileo’s writings were not removed from the Index of Banned Books until 1835. In 1986, Pope John Paul II admitted Galileo might have been right.
How can you claim to be debunking something you don't understand?
@@mirandahotspring4019lmao. So you believe he conveniently cut out their answers? Okay kindly answer on their behalf. Give an example of a bacteria that became something other than a bacteria
Since you understand it better. Give an observed example of a bacteria that evolved into something that wasn’t a bacteria
@@mirandahotspring4019 okay, thanks for this information. was this process observed? Has it been replicated? Is there an eukaryote cell that has been observed to transform into a human?
When exactly did this process occur? Why hasn’t this process occurred again? Or can I guess that I have to trust another billion years and somehow another species will evolve from eukaryotes again?
Have you actually studied this process or are you also parroting what you have been told?
If the eukaryote was the actual answer to this question, why don’t all these great scientists and professors go straight to that when the question was asked? I am sure they’ve researched this in depth, far more than me.
I am just asking questions here, miss researcher, give me your concrete evidence please. I’ll be here
@@aboyisebuke why does it have to be bacteria? Why do I have to have that specific of an example when other examples of animals and plants evolving into different species already exist such as banana's. Also why does it have to become something other than bacteria in order to prove evolution? Surely an example of a bacteria becoming a different species of bacteria should be enough to prove evolution right? Or are you only asking for things you know don't currently exist because you're scared of honest debate? Can you give an example of someone coming back from the dead? From any source other than the bible? Can you give a single example of a wooden ship big enough to carry two of every animal not being crushed by its own weight? How can you think that your theory stands more to scrutiny when there are way more scientifically impossible things that have to happen. "You can't come up with one incredibly hyperspecific example of a things that takes millions of years to recreate you lose" "but I have other examples of the same thing happening on different species of animals which we can observe throughout human history, and your theory doesn't even get past the first level of common sense" "don't care you lose" is that how you wanted this to go? In short, there are no examples of bacteria evolving in something that isn't bacteria, yet. There are examples of bacteria evolving into different species of bacteria. And there's several examples in human history of us breeding certain species of plants and animals into completely different species of what they were before. Such as bananas from their ancient counterpart. Watermelons from their ancient counterpart. Dogs from wolves. Ect.
Evolutionists have responded to you in as fancy a manner as they could without answering your question. Typical. And the one brought up sexual reproduction without describing how it came to be. “….male and female made He them….”
It’s easier to fool people than convince them they’ve been fooled!
Amen. 😄
That's is what religion is haha
@@witachapinamk1507 no that's what science does 😂😂😂
@@emperordavid2044 science explain why things happen with evidence, religion doesnt
@@witachapinamk1507 OK professor, then will you be so kind to answer the question that Ray is asking in the video pls🙄
I'm surprised no one said I'll I'll circle back to that question next question please.
Awesome reply still laughing
I'll circle back and maybe leave a response later in the day.....
A broad swerve is not an answer
Lol.
Mark Ogilvy. Lol . Good one.
Saying that two distinctly different bacteria are of the same kind is like saying coral and chimpanzees are the same kind because they are both in the animal kingdom.
Nope. The claim is that single cells evolved into humans, oak trees, every living thing. A bacteria processing citrus under slightly different conditions isn't anything like gaining a brain, spine, muscles, bones, eyes, etc. etc.
@fjccommish No one mentions that in this video, the whole premise was changes in "kind," but for the sake of argument, how does the change of physiology observed in the fossil record and genetics not alow common ancestry? Why and how is there a limit to the changes a lineage does?
@@skylarsobczak8040 The fossils show differences in physiology. Fossils don't change - that's not observed. One fossil is of an animal with legs, another of an animal with fins. That doesn't show legs changing into fins.
@fjccommish fossils change over time as the individuals in species change. Evolution is a process that takes many thousands of years to show discernable changes. If a scientist observes a lineage, develop fins into legs that would literally disprove evolution as it is known today because changes don't happen that fast in our current understanding of evolution.
@@fjccommishbut the changes (especially the big ones) don‘t occur instantly. They happen over a very long period of time. Especially when you are talking about a bacterium evolving into a very complex organism consisting out of hundreds of cells. This would take multiple million years to happen. You will never be able to see something like this in just your lifetime. However bacteria actually changing the way that they are shows a huge change in the organism itself that if upscaled would be equal to a monkey growing a second tale.
Yes, “kinds”. To go-to word of the creationist who doesn’t really understand evolution.
Always nice to see people accept that they can't give answers and not get angry
Or haven't got the answers that clearly exist for their arguments
Can you show me your cousin that didn't come from your grandparent? No? Then you lose!
It's the question that's malformed.
It's not true that Darwin said there'd be a change in kinds. He didn't even use the word "kind" in any of his books.
Plus, evolution doesn't involve one species changing into a fundamentally different kind anyway. So the question is both invalid and moot.
@Maskouye - Indeed. It's very nice of them to not get angry as they do their best to give answers that Ray could understand. Even though he chooses to use different terminology and misunderstand the concepts, they remain calm. But I suppose they're used to students thinking they know more than they do and, only through research do they realize how many experiments and tests and discoveries were made that support evolution and that it's not just a hunch or guess.
@@speciesspeciate6429 lol they dont said that cause people wouldn't believe them its so obvious that they dont have evidence they only have is comparing the similarities of human structure to animals obvious we would get similarities to them cause were not aliens that we dont have similarities to our soroundings we have bone almost other animals have bones and thousands of different kinds of species live in this world we cant avoid that we cant have similarities to them.
There just assumptions evolution is not true if there theory is challenged there just put it with another assumtion its more impossible that we evolve than we believe that there is god cause evolution dont have evidence.
It was always this easy. The wisdom of God will overthrow the so called wisdom of man.
For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God's sight. As it is written: "He catches the wise in their craftiness"; 1Co 3:19
For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength. 1Co 1:25
@@viniciusmagalhaeshorta7154 Amen
Amen!
Amen
I tell this to myself all them time. God always wins and I love it.
"Kinds" is hilarious. Primitive mysticism.
"I wonder why my professor never mentioned this profound problem?" 🤣🤣🤣
I doubt you have a biology professor. The only issue I see is the intentional misrepresentation of evolution (lying). You do agree that lying is not ethical, don't you? Why do you think creationist apologists continuously, and almost exclusively, and intentionally misrepresent what evolution is, if they think they can falsify it? Do you think they KNOW that they don't have any _real_ evidence to falsify evolution?
Fishes: "They're various forms of Nickelback"
Atheist: "heyyyy heyyyyy I wanna be a rockstar"
Lol
"Human beings are fish."
Arthur Morgan: "You sir, are a fish."
and a blowfish to be specific :-)
@AnarchoRepublican haha touché my friend
You guys love to pretend. When you do know and understand the science.
That went right over Arthurs head didn't it, what a dumbass
And we, sir, are living in Bikini Bottom!😁
My dude doesnt let them speak. As soon as they are answering he asks another question 😂😂😂
Well you tell us of any observable evidence?
@@allangrant6349Not the guy you responded to but I would be happy as soon as you provide a definition of the word "kind". That way you won't do what the guy in the video did and handwave all the evidence he was given because it didn't happen to at the level he called "kind".
@@alextowers3564 Thanks for message.He is basically saying what the Bible says in that God made animals in kinda.Such as cats,dogs, Reptile birds etc etc.He was saying that they have never found a fossil were it was in the process of changing kind when it died.Therefore there is no evidence for evolution taking place.Evolutionst then say it's due to macro evolution which happens over thousand or even millions of years.But that also can't be proven so it's like believing in the Bible,it take faith.
He was asking the same question in a different way!!
@@allangrant6349 sure the finches, the Galapagos turtles. The the bones of many creatures which shows slow change
How to anger a puffed up, proud evolutionist...
Remove their mask on video.
The facial tic was hilarious.
Because they don’t want to amid they wasted their life believing nothing which is still something!
Ray’s kindness shines through all these interactions.
Here you go folks, listen to a brilliant scientist who is not afraid to go against the flow...
ua-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/v-deo.html
@@jarrodmazzacca1911 What facts?
Ray never defined what a “kind” is.
It's when look very different
@@mayosmayo4738 that's meaningless.
Yes he did.
@@Maximise5 no he didn’t. Give me the time stamp where he gave a concrete definition for what he means when he says “kind”.
He mentioned “cats and lions” are a kind. If that’s the case, then humans and gorillas are also a kind. Boom, Ray Comfort agrees with evolution!!
@@mayosmayo4738 Define "look very different" Then. Because how different something looks to anotehr can be subjective. Me and my brother argue over exactly how different 2 colors are from each other or 2 animals.
So clarify what exactly is "Very different" Is it when they have different bodily structures? If so to what degree. At what point to the differences add up to be "Very different" more specifically define "very" in this specific case. To what degree must they be different to be "very" different.
The interviewer asks a question the interlocular provides an example and evidence of a change of kind through the fossil record. Interviewer ignores and asserts it's not a change unless it's observable and meets his definition and category of kind. He then interviews college students who are unprepared to answer the question. Is that really how we deduce what happened in the past? Would he be willing to say the flood never happened because he didn't observe it?
@@InstantNoodle3Dog breeding is a form of evolution. Granted it is not natural selection because it is merely the process of humans breeding different dogs until they look the way the breeders want them too. But it is still evolution because it would be the change of the physical characteristics of a group of organisms over time. The reason two dog breeds can still reproduce with each other is because there genomes are still similar enough, but if the dogs were continually bred to be different than another group of dogs over time they're genomes will become different enough that they will no longer be able to reproduce with each other. At this point they would be classified as different species or 'kinds'.
recognized this guy right away...none other than ( cosmic) ray comfort .
pretty simple answer: 'come back in 3 to 4 million years and I will show you many!"
But we have many millions of years of fossil record...
Jason Knowles But we didnt have the technology we do now...? Maybe that hint will get your brain gears oiled?
then its unscientific if cannot be proven, thus remains a theory. not even one fossil found in history of any macro evolution.
Question is.. How to know that the earth has 3 or 4 minions of years
So it cannot be observed, then?
saying: "If you can't see it, it's not real" is not a good argument for the existence of god.
I agree, that is a very bad argument.
yoyoma you’re right. You can’t see wind or the internet. We know they’re real tho. We see their effects. We can infer from the effects that they are indeed “real”.
Goes in Ya you can feel the wind though, it can be measured by velocity and direction even, and the internet is an even worse example. It was created by humans, you can absolutely see the computers, and the cables, distributor towers, sattelite dishes and sattelites that connect them to a network, and you can measure the signals that travel through it both by electrical pulses in the solid parts, as well as the electromagnetic waves that carry them through the air. True, human senses are not capable of perceiving those signals (which is great, we would go mad if we could, imagine if you could hear radio waves, you‘d hear every radio station in range at the same time all mushed together) but with the right equipment, they can totally be measured and made visible/audible to us.
Random Banshee that was my point. You can see the effects. Or in the internet you can see the infrastructure. There is just as much or more evidence of the creator. That is, unless you believe the scientific impossibly that nothing created everything. You see the infrastructure and use the internet and you know it was created. Same with the universe.
@@Farfromperfection ah gotcha, in that case i fully agree. How the universe came to be, and that it works at all as it does, is nothing short of a wonder. How the earth became so perfect for life to exist, and how humans came to be the way they are, are both _possible_ but very very unlikely, so chances are there was a helping hand involved as well. Those things i really do believe, the only thing that gets on my nerves are all those funny people that take a many hundred years old book of moral guidelines and little helpers _so literal_ and believe that is superior to actually seeking answers and thinking for themselves. And it's a good book, a great one even, imagine if everyone if everyone actually lived by the morality it teaches, no stealing, no killing, no lying, no cheating, always lending help to another person when the need arises :) funny how about 2000 years ago, people had the exact same problems. But no, they rather focus on spewing hate and laughing at people that don't take the bible literal^^
1:32 said "Humans are still Fish" and they cut it without showing him explain it.
If they hadn't cut it he probably would have said that it was fishes who had evolved lungs were the first vertebrates to reach land and they, over millions of years, developed stronger and stronger limbs, which eventually became legs. So what the professor was saying was that humans, primates, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians are all descended from fish. And if fishes are a monophyletic group, were all the taxa are descended from a common ancestor such as a ancient fish, then humans are fishes. Because, some of the members of that ancient fish evolved lungs and left the water to become reptiles, then mammals, then primates, then apes, then humans. (Keep in mind that while organisms continue evolving, that does not mean that the previous clade ceases, instead the new species are simply nested within the older ones). Other members of that ancient fish did not evolve lungs and did not move to land became modern fishes.
So, since humans are descended from ancient fish, and modern fish are as well, descended from that same ancient fish, it is impossible to exclude humans from the group of fish, without excluding "real" fishes.
TLDR: Humans and Fish are descended from the same common ancestor and thus humans are fish, as they cannot not be fish without fish also not being fish.
Note: I do think that the addition of the word "*still*" in this quote complicates his message, no matter how much any organism descended from the ancient fish evolves, it is still a fish. It could revert to single celled form and still be a fish.
I went over this with a fine tooth comb over 3 years solid.
The answer is none.
@@lancetschirhart7676 Science is about fact. If it's truth you're after, the philosophy department is right down the hallway...
@@conorleon3591 "This makes science a powerful tool to find out about the world
." Continuously proven to be wrong, again and again, makes science a powerful tool ...? I don't understand.
Micro evolution is real.
Conor Leon the trouble with evolutionary theory is that the entire foundation has been overturned as our scientific endeavors have revealed a bigger picture, and yet because of a philosophical pre-commitment to atheism, many scientists are forced to interpret the data within the evolutionary paradigm. Re-working theories based on new observations is real science. Preferring theories that have become so untenable in light of new observations that they no longer hold any viable explanatory power is science fiction. Evolution is science fiction.
This video was embarassing for the interviewer. Look at whale evolution for a start. evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evograms_03
They needed evolutional years to give an example
I think they should realize their mistakes and seek Jesus
Deliberate atheist I will call them
@@thatonezachAnyone as in?
@@thatonezachActually you question is still vague base on my perspective and belief
Nope but I will marry
@@thatonezach Nope
@@thatonezach You're wrong
If so, then who caused that naturality to come into existence?
@@thatonezachI've been a Muslim before, my dad and most of my neighbors were animists.. Most of my neighbors who were Muslims and animists are now Christian, Why?
Jesus Christ is proved physically, logically, spiritually, scientifically, historically, psychologically, and mathematically.. Jesus is truth, peace, joy, salvation, eternal life and hope, gracious, merciful, loving, and He's alive
The Bible which is the word of God is truth at all angles
If Jesus is truth then He's promises are real
Just give your life to Him and you shall see His Glory
You need Him buddy
The narrator in this video assumes that evolution occurs horizontally, eg one ‘kind’ becoming another across the evolutionary tree whereas in reality, like a tree, branches ‘kinds’ have a common source/ancestor. Therefore one branch does not suddenly split to become a pre-existing branch (to use his example a fish becoming a cat etc) but rather forms a new distinct set of branches eg species.
Of course from one kind does not arise a pre-existing kind but rather a new kind. An example being the clearly documented, researched and understood transition from aquatic organisms to land mammals.
that's what we've been told.
But it's still a branch
@@gizmo5197 Not really a new kind, a new division is more accurate. You do not stop being the "kind" you previously were, e.g. once a cat will always be cat. Yes, mammals evolved from aquatic animals, this is documented and still visible, even in humans (yes, there are remnants of a aquatic animal inside of us, ofc creationists will simply deny it, like wishing it aint true makes it so).
I was ridiculed as a child for saying we come from the sea.
"Human beings are fish?"
"Of course, they are?"
Haha!!!
Yaffa Yafo .....so you have faith in ‘ cod ‘...?
Yaffa Yafo - I was thinking the same thing. Just like they are confounded if you ask them where thought starts. They can only explain how they think the brain works but not how or where the process begins. The Holly process starts with the Soul, or that observable spark at that moment of conception. That is not able to be weighed, calculated, measured, or dissected, but by the Lord Almighty. No one knows us better then he does. Every thought and every deed. Example. The better we do in Life the more we’d like to be recognized for it, The flip side is the deeper our sin, the farther we’d like to bury it. The Lord speaks to everyone of us everyday, it is up to us to learn how and when to listen. I think I finally learned that lesson this past week. I have been praying for another car, I got into a no injury auto accident this past week that totaled my car. (Road Sign Pole in the middle of the Highway) at night. I was all kinds of depressed and sad. I stopped praying and was just present without praying or reading the word. I was in a very desperate situation, on the ropes really, I prayed that night. The next morning the blessing woke me up with a phone call. Insurance pay out was 3x what any other offer I’d received on the car before the accident. Hopefully these teachers will examine Scripture after this encounter with Ray.
Sounds Fishy
@@CatMan_7 Yup. There is no working evidence of any "living kind" creature evolving. Transgender doesn't count.
I'd rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.
If you believe in a god, that's exactly what you have. This comment could go either way since religious people like to accuse Atheists of what they alone are guilty, but figured I'd point that out just in case.
Evolution is real and proven. The term “kind” is a biblical term, not a scientific one. In science we have different species, not kinds. Evolution is true and reliable. We cannot pint point the “exact” moment in which a species changes into another, the same way that when we look at a gradient color from green to red, we cannot tell at what point the green became red, there are many steps in between, but we cannot deny that at the top we have green and at the bottom we have red. Therefore the green became red.
-Exurb1a
@@ivancal123 Would be great to hear proof about how evolution (but more preferably abiogenesis) actually happened, as without it there can be no life. Feel free to post links to non speculative, scientifically accurate data, in order for everyone to be edified on any actual facts proving abiogenesis.
As for Darwinian Evolution, it is a fact, BUT, it only works on fully formed existing species, there is zero evidence for intermediary species in the fossil record, the axolotl, archaeopteryx and those with vestigial bones etc etc have all been scientifically debunked, by real non religious scientists, not fruit cakes. If you choose to hold onto the your belief that evolution is real, based on just 2 weeks of reading about fossils and Tommy the T-rex stories at kindergarten, then you are as blind as the religious nutters that believe the world is only a few thousand years old.
If you want to know the truth, drop your ego and do the right research on both sides of the debate. If you only listen to the 'made for brainwashing' pro evolution videos on here, how can you ever expect to learn the truth?
Have you even seen the Gunter Bechley video on the large number of explosions of life in the fossil record that still cannot be explained and therefore totally debunks Darwinian evolution? Those explosions are similar to the Cambrian but far more significant, as they show millions of 'fish and mammals' seemingly appearing out of nowhere in the fossil record, without any common ancestors!
Sure, believe whatever you want to believe, but if you are intelligent, I'm certain you'd want to ensure your belief is based on actually facts, not the fantastical claptrap that comes out of the mouth of pensioners such as Dawkins et al. You'll never hear Dawkins talking about the mitochondria because he cannot explain it.
Have you ever even looked how complex a mitochondria is?
Most scientists now agree that the most simple cell had to ingest a mitochondrion and yet the mitochondrion is far more advanced than the simple cell! That's why they never discuss how the mitochondrion evolved! Do you know it took a scientist 15 years to be able to perform the Krebs cycle in a lab, a task so difficult he actually got a noble prize for it, and yet we are expected to believe that a so called simple organelle, just happened by chance to 'evolve' the ability to carry out the same complex series of chemical reactions necessary for the Krebs cycle! SO far it is joke that requires more faith than the average religious person has.
Any good scientist should be looking for the truth and the real evidence that supports it, sadly such evidence appears to be drastically lacking in the case of abiogenesis and evolution and they are making it up as they go along.
Chemicals are inert, they are not alive, they cannot evolve, or make up their minds to form together and create proteins or lipids. Added to this video's number crunching, have you ever actually looked at what proteins are?
The simple proteins this video uses are the most basic type and these are the ones evolutionists etc talk about in order to make their fallacy sound plausible, because there is now way they can explain the complexity of the proteins that are actually found in the living cell, because many of them are organic machines with specific functions. Research Integral Membrane Proteins and try to imagine how such things could ever form without some type of code or design.
Believe it or not, some of us actually want to know the truth, the real facts, we don't care about religion (Biblical or Scientific), so show us the evidence! Because after taking an interest in this subject and scouring UA-cam/Google for more than a year, I have yet to find anything that can explain how abiogenesis actually happened. Show me a scientist who can give the facts without using terms such as ' Possibly, probably, perhaps, it might, we believe, we think', or Dawkins particular favourite "it MUST have happened" haha, what a joker.
As for evolution, you can't have evolution until you have something to evolve, viz a viz, abiogenesis and the odds 'against' abiogenesis occurring by chance are staggering.
Listen to the biochemist Dr James Tour on youtube, he has totally debunked every single experiment the has attempted to create the building blocks of life in the lab, as all of those experiments use Chemicals such as oxygen, hydrogen and carbon, which are already known to form life, based one their own 'spuriously' far fetched notions, that those chemicals just so happened to be present on Earth ind abundant enough quantities to form the primordial soup.
Life had to be present for Darwinian Evolution to be possible, without abiogenesis you cannot have evolution, that's why it must be the starting point for any actual scientific debate on the subject.
So rather than ridiculing the video and doing nothing else, why not post evidence that supports your own erroneous beliefs and proves abiogenesis/evolution are a fact?
@@ankyspon1701 "Life had to be present for Darwinian Evolution to be possible"
Yeah, some genius put life on this planet billions of years ago then put it's "greatest creation" on the planet to rule over everything in the last few days 🦄🦕
🤦
I mean what about birds coming from dinosaurs? No one would say that birds and reptiles are the same "kind" and we have clear evidence that they have a common ancestor. Obviously depends on what you mean by "kind"
How it can be if modern birds are found with dinosaurs?
Information can be found on Dr. Carl Werner's book Living Fossils.
@@KingPingviini If we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys? Your argument makes no sense.
@@KingPingviini Modern bird weren't found alongside dinosaurs. Carl Werner is just a fool that can't tell two different birds apart.
@@KingPingviini Most of the major phyla that we see today evolved during the Cambrian Explosion 530myo and dinosaurs evolved around 250myo so it makes sense for a lot of "modern" species to coexist with the dinosaurs.
The archaeopteryx (thought to be the first bird) is from approx. 150 myo. So the timeline actually supports the idea that birds evolved from dinosaurs. And it seems obvious that there would be some overlap. Dinosaurs are thought to have gone extinct 66 myo. That's 84 myo overlap where birds and dinosaurs coexist. That all seems consistent to me... Am I missing something? Tried to look into Carl Werner and couldn't find any examples of "modern" birds being found with dinosaurs?
[also for the record, we didn't evolve from monkeys, we have a common ancestor with chimpanzees]
As an ex atheist, I noticed, when I was continually denying the creation of God around me, I figured out that it all boiled down to one thing. No matter what I knew to be true, I just wanted to say, “NO” to God. I simply just didn’t want to make God the God of my life. I was God and nothing was going to change that.
feel free to believe in gods. evolution is exhaustively verified
So, you were an atheist? Interesting. May I ask what it was that convinced you of the existence of undetectable supernatural being of the category labelled "gods", and that it wasn't just any god but a quite specific god (I noticed you using the common noun as a proper Noun).
thank odin
Love GOD, always.
Even when things don't seem to make sense, and you have doubts, and you go through seasons of despair.
Rely not on your own understanding, all we need to know is GOD loves us, and wants us to spend eternal life with him.
Never forget GOD loves you, and he's always with you, and will never let you down.
Amen.
Thank you 🙏🏽 I needed this
Agreed. For being a fish, you’re pretty wise😉
thanks
have a good day
bowz So, where was the “loving God” when that little girl’s grandfather dropped her out of a cruise ship? Where was God’s love when little innocent kids died horrible deaths in the Holocaust, the rape of Nanking, the Rwandan genocide, the Pol Pot regime, the Biafran famine? If you loved mankind infinitely, as you claim your God does, and had infinite power, as you claim your Goddoes, wouldn’t you stop all the suffering, especially of the innocent? If God loves mankind, he sure has a funny way of showing it. I have asked this question many times, and all I ever get fromtheists is circular reasoning, “God works in strange ways”, “ya just have to believe”, etc. Fact: humans’ suffering - innocent humans, I mean especially children - is rampant. If God were all-powerful and all merciful this horror would stop instantly. More accurately, it would never have happened in the first place.
Christians believe in a God that denied salvation until his own son was tortured to death. The symbol of the religion is an instrument of torture. How barbaric and cruel is that?
It makes believers feel really good, deep, spiritual, and special to believe in God. I felt that way as a little kid, when I believed in Santa. Then I found out the truth: there is no Santa. It was disappointing, but at least I knew the truth.
Someday, you’ll realize the truth: there is no all-loving, all-powerful God. That’s why there is so much pain and suffering in the world.
May God open their eyes to his wonderful love!
Do you know how books work?
Open your eyes for evolution
Also, Ray hires actors, not real scientists.
@@St._Jaden_P for one, scientists won’t go out and talk to certain people that preach, because they know that it will create a controversial argument. Also, Ray is no scientist and doesn’t really understand the concept in how evolution exists. Of course he doesn’t pay attention to science at all, because he doesn’t want to hear facts, but he wants to know stuff in the Bible. Also, evolution is Proven, so there is no need for him and others to go out an preach and change people’s beliefs. Also, I thought that in Christianity, you have freewill and you are allowed to use it in anyway you want
@@St._Jaden_P my answer is that people who have certain opinions normally keep it to themselves. Since I am an evolutionist, I would rather keep my thoughts and opinions to myself, rather than being recorded. Honestly, if these scientists are actual scientists, then Ray Comfort is dumb to ask them questions.
@@abrahamlincoln9280 just to be clear, you're saying, that you won't have dialogue with opposing views but keep to a box of ideas....that sounds like a good way to learn.
The only thing the professors are stumped about is how to explain to someone with low-level thinking abilities the realities of evolution.
So you wanna say that professors are better humans than low-level thinking people, huu? Professors who say: Humans are fish? Yeah...
@@oldol12 I wasn't referring to professors in general; I was referring to these specific professors, who have a deeper understanding of how this world works than the interrogator in this video. And evolution doesn't believe that humans are fish. Have you ever studied evolution? Having a basic understanding of the science would equip you better for having this discussion.
Wonder how he teaches his students
@@gregmolnar6318 how do you study something, that you can't even examine? Is there a way to go back in time and actually see the Big Bang? So until people are gonna be able to actually PROVE that to someone, i can treat evolution as a theory, because it is nothing more nothing less. It's only science, when you can actually prove and repeat a process. Study a lifetime and still die as a fool.
One of the silliest videos I've watched about this subject.
So, in the very limited time span since Darwin we're expected to magically witness processes which take millions of years to happen and to also magically know how the millions of different plant and animal species on Earth might be evolving or not. Using a totally unscientific word such as "kind". The final part with the students is really embarrassingly bad
The Asaians were the only honest responders.
@Udoeze David Yes, I noticed that too...most likely because due to a non-Christian background (their traditional background....of course many Asians are Christian these days) they are not invested in anti-Christianity which is the stance of most Western Atheists.
@@rh001YT I never thought of it like that before.
The only thing these 'professors' know absolutely is that there cannot be any God. Ever. Now draw the conclusions.
Brother just look at the fossil record 💀. There’s all the evidence that you need
fossil record already got debunked that's why they didn't mention it
@@mohammadramadan8108 In your wet dreams, boy.
@@mohammadramadan8108 the fossil record isn’t debunked 😭. Dawg I’m sorry but look at reality
Kind doesn't mean anything in science. He is being given example after example of evolution that has been observed and he is dismissing it because he wants to see vast changes over short times which is exactly what evolution doesn't say. Evolution is a fact. It has been observed and recorded many times. He also thinks observed means you need to see the changes happen right before your eyes. You can see the changes in the fossil record and it can be verified by independent study of anyone.
Kind is equivalent to the "Family" level of biological classification as pointed out in the full version of the video.
No one is asking to see changes happening "right before our eyes". We simply want evolutionists to stop equivocating the word "observe" as you did when you pretended that looking at fossils counts. You can't test fossils, you can't repeat fossils. They are static and there is no way to tell whether the fossil you are looking at behind glass is evolving into something else or even if it had any offspring. The scientific method requires testing, observing (as the experiment is happening), and repeating. Darwinian evolution fails this method and requires faith.
It's why fish "evolving" into other fish or birds "evolving" into other birds is the best the professors could offer. There is simply no way to prove it scientifically. You can't get from molecules to man without millions of changes through all of the biological Families and there is no reason to believe that it is possible (without blind faith) if it's never been seen.
Matthew I am curious now to know if there is any proof out there in the fossil record that would show an animal of one kind/family that evolved into another family species. Like saying a T-Rex dinosaur had fossils that showed part of their transformation and fossils were found that showed some fossils that resembled a T-Rex and the rest of it's body showed fossils that looked similar to a Rhinoceros. That would be a record of a fossilized transformation.
@@LivingWaters Let me guess, you also don't believe in atoms, electrons and quarks because they have never been observed? While we're at it, nobody was around for the big bang either so that's probably fake too.
Religion is truly the antithesis of education, you are so very deluded I feel sorry for you.
@@LivingWaters Evolution has been observed. When you ask scientists about that, their definition of evolution is changes in a species over time, not the entire history of evolution on earth as you seem to define that word. If that’s what you’re asking about, don’t call it “evolution.” That’s not how any scientists, or students taking biology courses, use the term.
Also, not being able to directly observe something means the belief is based on faith? Do you not believe in logical deduction? And do you think the professors have observed fish evolving into other fish? No, that’s also based on deduction. The “It’s why” makes no sense there. The last sentence of your comment makes me think you don’t have even a basic grasp of evolutionary biology. Why would single-cell organisms eventually evolving to man require “changes through all of the biological families?” It has nothing to do with most biological families.
If these thought processes weren’t so sad they would be funny.
The joys of being part of the smug left.
@@JACKDAWFISH ah yes... this has to do with being on the left. Coming from a right winger, evolution is SCIENCE. FACTS OVER FEELINGS, just because your religion says something doesn't mean it is FACT.
@@oliviaperera3323 . Ever heard of Issac Newton? Anyone who takes an interest in, and believes in, science, should have. I suggest you Google "Quotes by Isaac Newton". I can assure you, that man had more savvy than you and me together 10 times over. Good night. 😴😴😴
@@klausdirr5100 Issac Newton was also fond of sticking pins in his eyes and trying to turn lead into gold.
@@klausdirr5100 You are referring to a person that not just lived in a society and age where you could get very easily persecuted or killed for not being religious, but you could even profit and have advantages from doing the opposite. It's like you have said "oh, look at this scientist that lives under a communistic totalitarian regime approving his dictator and not saying anything against him, while his whole family is being threatened with Ak-47s:D
Colossians 1:16- For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
@@jarrodmazzacca1911 Don't blame God for the wickedness we do, nor the consequences of our wickedness.
@@jarrodmazzacca1911 God created us with free will. God created us with the ability to choose between good and evil. You cannot have true love without free will. We can teach our kids to obey us, but can't make them obey us. We are not robots, all of us have different aspirations and talents; all of which were given by God. In this world, men can chose to be evil or to follow Christ. This free will he also gave to the angels, in which Satan chose to disobey and try to destroy God's creation. Sin and death only entered into world when we chose to disobey him, when Eve was decieved by Satan. In God's infinite knowledge, he knew that we would fall into sin.He knew that he would have to send his son Jesus Christ to be a substitute for our sins. Jesus took my sin and all of mankind's sin and died on the cross. Washing our sins away in his blood, we are reconciled to God through his son Jesus Christ. You have a choice today, to give your life to Christ. He can forgive your sins and you can be his son if you chose to repent and turn from your sin and believe in J esus Christ.
jarrod mazzacca - murder? When is it called murder when God the creator judges His creation? Understand this before you throw out false statements. God is unable to be wicked, all His ways are pure, & His judgement is just.
@@jarrodmazzacca1911 God Gave us free will to chose, but we are not free from the consequences of our choices. We can chose evil, but we are bound to the consequences of sin and Evil. We can still choose to do evil, as anyone can, so we do have a choice. One of the first things God made after he made man was rules. We as human beings needs rules and commandments to live by. Just imagine a world were no one was held accountable for thier actions. We can already see that by our histrory in which Adolf Hitler killed 6 million Jews. We need a moral standard to live by and those come from God, like the 10 commandments. I dont condemn anyone, by the way and I dont puff myself up above other people. We are all sinners, all of us. We all need forgiveness, we are all broken in some way, we all need Jesus. As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
@@jarrodmazzacca1911 God gave us free will to chose, but we are not free from the consequences of our choices. If we chose sin and evil, they have a consequence. If someone choses to kill someone, they face the consequences. Its still a choice, its still freewill. I dont bash people by the way, but I do hope all people come to the knowledge of the truth in Christ. All have sinned and come short of the glory of God, all of us need forgiveness, all of us are lost without Christ, all of us are broken in some way. I am a sinner who needs a savior, I come to God in humility and admit my faults and my sins. A humble heart is a good place to start. Gods abases the proud, but gives grace to the humble. The bible is the inspired word of God, so you cant read it like any normal book. Reading and praying and meditating over the word helps, asking God for knowledge and guidance helps, and continuing in research into commentaries of each passage helps too.
1 Corinthians 2;14-But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
16 For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? but we have the mind of Christ.
This interviewer actually was born with a dent in their forehead
A change of kind example would be Rinos of the Republican Party in the US, they become invertebrates with no backbone almost overnight when it’s politically expedient to do so .
Haha!
Mmm.. my guess is that they were invertebrates all along.. but it came to light overnight when a backbone was needed..
It’s Godless vs those in Jesus Christ…faith.
Smartest thing stated on this page.
@@melissaculpepper7663 In terms of IQ, Godless wins 78 - 0
I'm not sure about the channel as a whole but this video is misleading and uninformative
how so
@w yes, it's an interesting theory indeed, however it lacks an explanation for a change of kind, either suddenly or over a long time period. Even if the theory proves to be true at some point, I still believe in God, as Im not sure Genesis account of creation is meant to be hyper literal. In any case, God bless you!! :)
@w agreed