Most HEATED Moments From Bill Nye Debate with Ken Ham

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 лис 2016
  • In this video, you'll see the most heated moments from the Bill Nye debate with Ken Ham at the life-size Noah's Ark (arkencounter.com/). They discuss the meaning of life, climate change, and more!
    You can get the full 2-hour video plus the highlights at AnswersBookstore.com/debate.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6 тис.

  • @connerbeus1955
    @connerbeus1955 Рік тому +541

    I appreciate that when talking to the public they each gave eachother a chance to talk without the other interrupting

    • @connerbeus1955
      @connerbeus1955 Рік тому +26

      At least for the most part 😂

    • @jjphank
      @jjphank Рік тому

      Matter and energy cannot be created nor destroyed, therefore no matter nor energy would’ve existed to do the causing. Consequently, whatever did cause the universe to exist, would need to be immaterial and exist beyond time and space! Genesis 1: 1 God creates time space and matter!
      Entropy is somewhat opposite of evolution and why did this come into the universe if everything’s getting better. Genesis 2:17 says death came into the universe through the first sin!
      First two chapters of the Bible not the 500th chapter or the thousandth chapter; explain what evolutionists have not explained;, The first two laws of thermodynamics!
      DNA does not auto encrypt, it did not write itself the code writer is outside of the code. 3300 billion lines of computer code in 1 humans DNA, would fill the Grand Canyon 50 times of Books, let alone plant and animal DNA and it did not write itself! One person‘s DNA could stretch to the sun and back 61 times! Psalm 139:16 “in my members you have written many books“.
      John 21:25 “I suppose everything Jesus did the world will not have enough room for the Books, telling of it“
      Job 38:35 “were you there when I created the lightnings and they say ‘here we are!”’ This is God talking to Job!
      3300 years later, James Maxwell discovers that light rays and electricity are two forms of the same thing!
      The Bible Predicted telecommunications

    • @CeeJayH
      @CeeJayH Рік тому +22

      not really. bro kept saying “but what happens when they’re gone” 🤣

    • @ericprado542
      @ericprado542 Рік тому +19

      I thought that at any second, bill nye was gonna sucker punch him.

    • @averagefemale6757
      @averagefemale6757 Рік тому +9

      This is sarcasm right?

  • @bearrrmann
    @bearrrmann Рік тому +654

    My favorite part of this debate is when can ham says to Bill Nye "you too can be saved" and Bill Nye just stares at him and instead of rejecting him he just says thank you and moves on and that was just a real human moment.

    • @matthewlydon6592
      @matthewlydon6592 11 місяців тому +10

      That was awesome!😂

    • @bobbart4198
      @bobbart4198 11 місяців тому +16

      ... Canned Ham ? ...🍖

    • @B1rdTheW0rd
      @B1rdTheW0rd 11 місяців тому +38

      Yeah that was awesome. That’s a seed planted. Praise the Lord. Praying others will water and God will bring the increase.

    • @langre_2
      @langre_2 11 місяців тому +37

      @@B1rdTheW0rdI can go ahead and tell you coming from a person who holds similar beliefs as nye, he couldn’t care less what religious people say. If you think he gives two craps about prayers you’re sadly mistaken bc he doesn’t care.

    • @thingfish000
      @thingfish000 10 місяців тому

      Bill Nye is a smug dolt. He's promoted that trendy "gender spectrum" foolishness. He has no credibility in my eyes.

  • @bryanjames5256
    @bryanjames5256 Рік тому +303

    I find this incredibly entertaining and frustrating all at the same time. 😂

  • @mollynewman5862
    @mollynewman5862 11 місяців тому +160

    Nye: You start with a belief. I start with evidence.
    Ham: Where is your proof that life arose from natural causes?
    Nye: We haven’t proven it.
    Ham: Then that’s a belief.
    Nye: You don’t understand science.
    Me: 😂

    • @alexanderdenney6255
      @alexanderdenney6255 11 місяців тому +21

      Bill Nye made a mistake my letting Ken continually steamroll over him every time he would try to make a point. Ken keeps making up some divide in science called observational science and historical science which has been directly refuted on numerous times. Because he wants to continue decieving people with this and we know this. I shouldn't bother even trying to convince him but maybe I can get to some of his followers. Its not just evolution that refutes the bible, its mountains of evidence in every major field of study. Its why despite what ken ham says, droves of people are leaving the faith the more they understand science. Our knowledge of evolution is litterally the foundation for our knowledge of biology. This is why we have vaccines for viruses that used to kill many people each year. Science did that. Not praying to god.
      Viruses arent technically alive so they dont technically undergo evolution in the common sense, but the same mechanics apply. Mutations in the DNA of the virus cause changes in the virus. Thats why we need to renew our shots every so often because the virus chsnges enough to where our body doesnt recognise it anymore. Surely anyone looking can accept this right?
      The same things happen with bacteria which are alive. The reason antibiotic resistant superbacteria exist is because when people dont take their full prescription of a certain antibiotic, and just stop when they feel better, they leave alive the bacteria that were more resistant to that antibiotic Which lets them proliferate and now you have stronger bacteria that are more resistant to a particular drug. Now you have evidence of evolution by natural selection. Because life changes.
      Ive also seen ken ham make up some arbitrary divide between evolution called micro and macro evolution. Evolution is just evolution. Change is just change. The only difference is time span. Many small changes compiled atop generations leads to more differences between the parent and daughter generations. And yet he continues to put some invisible limit on how much change can occur. Dont you see thats ridiculous?

    • @alexanderdenney6255
      @alexanderdenney6255 11 місяців тому

      Bill nye like every other scientist starts with a question. Which is then turned into an experiment to answer the question. If this, then this, because this. His belief system is built by evidence from experiments. Whereas Kens belief system is built off "the bible told me so" which every Christian somehow conciders a 2000 year old book written by numerous people that never actually contains any timeless wisdom other that obvious ones like killing is bad. Duh killing is bad. No-one needs god to say that. The fact that god chose a book of words to communicate to people rather than a mass transmission of understanding is prove against itself alone. Written words are flawed being they're so up for interpretation. Just think about how Catholics, jews, Baptists, Mormons and jehovah witnesses all read the same book and yet if you were to put them in a conference room they would argue calling eachother wrong and claiming to have knowledge of the one true god.
      Words are limited in their ability to communicate, and an omniscient being could surely think of a better way. Even I can.
      If I had a message I wanted to convey to people, like god to the world of sinners, I would use my powers to share my understanding, my feelings, my rationale and my emotions directly to the people so they know my thought process directly. This will allow them to directly understand my entire rationale on any particular subject. Rather than a book that can be so wildly interpreted.

    • @joshhighlights3310
      @joshhighlights3310 10 місяців тому +14

      @@alexanderdenney6255you have more faith in your religion, than what I have in the Bible 😂😂😂😂

    • @michaelsears6702
      @michaelsears6702 9 місяців тому +20

      @alexanderdenney6255 Ken Ham really did steamroll Bill Nye didn’t he? It just shows that atheists and agnostics have a blind faith. I mean Ken Ham is more fit to be the science guy since he actually has a degree in Biology.

    • @SpeakMakeGive
      @SpeakMakeGive 9 місяців тому +4

      @@michaelsears6702 and he actually uses science instead of head cannons

  • @alyssakays367
    @alyssakays367 Рік тому +831

    Anyone else notice that Bill seems to cringe anytime God is mentioned?

    • @henrylivingstone2971
      @henrylivingstone2971 Рік тому +267

      Because it’s kind of like a cheat. It’s kind of like two kids playing and one of them yells “I have a shield!”. It’s like a trump card with no basis in reality.
      He doesn’t really need an argument because he can just answer “because god” as if it answers a question without any evidence.

    • @HHSMCJROTC
      @HHSMCJROTC Рік тому +78

      @@henrylivingstone2971 the cheat is avoiding accountability by just excusing all absent a creator

    • @henrylivingstone2971
      @henrylivingstone2971 Рік тому +24

      @@HHSMCJROTC
      Avoiding accountability for what?

    • @andrewmorse2181
      @andrewmorse2181 Рік тому +38

      @@henrylivingstone2971 Morality. Reality. Purpose.

    • @henrylivingstone2971
      @henrylivingstone2971 Рік тому +48

      @@andrewmorse2181
      Morality varies based on the person.
      Reality is not a word that does not pertain to people of your particular belief system. It’s not reality if you can’t explain or justify any of your claims.
      Purpose is subjective.

  • @megofiachra3247
    @megofiachra3247 Рік тому +274

    There was obvious tension and disagreement and even contempt for each other’s beliefs, but there were no raised voices, and everyone was allowed to talk.

    • @refthegeneric
      @refthegeneric Рік тому +14

      On an unrelated note I'd pay for a wrestling match between them after that

    • @jusfugly
      @jusfugly 10 місяців тому +5

      Bill doesn't have beliefs.

    • @lucieudem
      @lucieudem 10 місяців тому +7

      Bill has knowledge based on science

    • @jusfugly
      @jusfugly 10 місяців тому +5

      @@lucieudem Exactly, and science is based on evidence.
      And Ken Ham has zero evidence.
      Just baseless belief.

    • @turnip1744
      @turnip1744 5 місяців тому

      Bill insulted him tho

  • @mayatbee4223
    @mayatbee4223 7 місяців тому +9

    Am I the only getting flashbacks of listening to my parents fight ?

  • @1thess523
    @1thess523 11 місяців тому +68

    "i have evidence" "i can't prove it"

    • @cabhisek6308
      @cabhisek6308 10 місяців тому

      @@m.zacharias8952 so what hypothesis are you talking about? Big bang, evolution, carbon dating? I suggest studying Karl Popper to find the true definition of science. Since when mere opinions are regarded as hard sciences, Bill like many scientist-wannabe atheists are no more than clowns. Conspiring agendas based on opinions and forcing their atheistic beliefs on the most impressionable minds of children in colleges is not science but propaganda, can't you see; societies, communities, and families are being destroyed in the name of spreading genes. They do worship a god, its name is Darwin.

    • @ITGOES80808
      @ITGOES80808 5 місяців тому +1

      He could’ve referenced evolution, that’s more than enough proof, but that’s his decision

    • @eduardopena5893
      @eduardopena5893 3 місяці тому

      @@ITGOES80808 There is no proof of evolution.

    • @jotunthe11thhyman65
      @jotunthe11thhyman65 3 місяці тому

      @@ITGOES80808 Evolution is fake. Species adaptation is real. It is way too hard for a species to turn into a new species by random chance even over millions of years.

    • @adrftgvvbh
      @adrftgvvbh 3 місяці тому +4

      ​​@@ITGOES80808 Evolution proves what? That animals adapt?

  • @laurencarter3844
    @laurencarter3844 Рік тому +346

    “Im glad he learned the fundamentals of architecture” 😭🤣

    • @unknwnfrequency
      @unknwnfrequency Рік тому +4

      😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

    • @sophiagoodman-merel7453
      @sophiagoodman-merel7453 7 місяців тому +5

      Ken Ham boasts that his scientist built a building 😂 What more brilliant thing could you say to that?

    • @IronMatt
      @IronMatt 5 місяців тому +1

      He's such a good actor that you might think he's a science guy or something 🤔

  • @RusselberryYo
    @RusselberryYo Рік тому +644

    “I’ve never seen a tree grow faster than trees grow.” 😂 legendary

    • @aeronblitz9347
      @aeronblitz9347 Рік тому +26

      But thats circular reasoning because he's saying that trees only grow 1 ring per year and therefore cannot grow more rings per year because that would mean it grows faster than it does, assuming that 1 ring per year is undeniable truth.

    • @miguelmarques8593
      @miguelmarques8593 Рік тому +22

      @@aeronblitz9347 if we observe trees always grow 1 ring per year at all times, we can *induce* tress grow 1 ring per year.
      We make regular inductions all the time, and if you want to be a cynic, all inductions arent good enough, since one case that proves these wrong causes the whole induction to fail.
      Personally, im not a cynic. If, for the hundreds of years we've been here, something always acts the same way, there is no reason to believe it would be any different in the past.

    • @tonymaurice4157
      @tonymaurice4157 Рік тому +10

      Abiogenesis has no proof

    • @LisaAnn777
      @LisaAnn777 Рік тому +9

      ​@@tonymaurice4157 no Abiogenesis haven't been proven completely, even though organic molecules have shown to start organizing by themselves without a wizard. But evolution has been proven and that alone disproves your Yahweh or Allah or whatever you worship.

    • @tonymaurice4157
      @tonymaurice4157 Рік тому

      @LVB🦅 You're just assuming it will be proven.. It's plagued with massive problems and the chemistry is highly manipulated.. You have no clue what you're talking about, Just another youtube atheist that has wishful thinking for your origin of life disaster!

  • @fullnelson3028
    @fullnelson3028 11 місяців тому +155

    Bill Nye has made me want to be born again

    • @ElfAsura
      @ElfAsura 10 місяців тому +1

      hahah

    • @osmosis321
      @osmosis321 10 місяців тому +5

      Why, was the first time not exciting enough?

    • @dantasticmania8728
      @dantasticmania8728 10 місяців тому +11

      Bill Nye is literally the Bob Vila of scientists, meaning he's got as much credibility as Bob Vila was as carpenter. Bob Vila was just tv carpenter and not a real carpenter. In fact he was so bad at hammering a single nail that they had to do multiple takes for him to get it right. In fact the tv show "Home Improvement" staring Tim Allen was a complete parody on Bob Vila from the home improvement show"This Old House".

    • @osmosis321
      @osmosis321 10 місяців тому +10

      @@fullnelson3028 Oh I'm *sooo* scared.

    • @jusfugly
      @jusfugly 10 місяців тому

      You only get born once, just like everybody else on the planet.

  • @re3z0r
    @re3z0r 11 місяців тому +128

    I really like what Ken is doing early in this video. He is establishing the fact that even if you don't believe in God you still have your own belief system.

    • @re3z0r
      @re3z0r 11 місяців тому +4

      @@justineseman3741 not sure what you mean by that my friend

    • @justineseman3741
      @justineseman3741 11 місяців тому +7

      @@re3z0r Dead serious, This comment was meant for a completely different comment. I don't know how it ended up on your comment, i have no issues here. i'll delete it. i mean, it doesnt even make sense to your context.

    • @re3z0r
      @re3z0r 11 місяців тому +6

      @@justineseman3741 all good lol. take care.

    • @osmosis321
      @osmosis321 11 місяців тому +8

      That's fine, my belief system includes things like evidence whereas Ham's doesn't.

    • @Xhopp3r
      @Xhopp3r 10 місяців тому

      ​@@osmosis321 your so called evidence, is made up evidence and it's made up in order to build up an anti creator agenda.
      As in the case of Bill's example of Pluto. For decades Pluto was thought of as a planet. New discoveries, through better observation systems, and better measuring equipment, have forced scientists to change their minds to the point where now Pluto is no longer considered a planet.
      However, before the new discoveries, for decades there was evidence that Pluto was a planet, and it was taught in schools that it was.
      So your so called evidence, is only evidence, until new discoveries turn your evidence into lies.
      Science is a perpetual lie based on constant manufacturing of evidence. All because some people just really hate God, and do not want to recognize Him. If they were to recognize Him, that would mean they have a master. That they cannot do, because that means they can be held accountable for their sin.
      Regardless of what you or they think, everyone will have to give an account for their actions, and God's justice will have the ultimate say so.
      Putting your head in the sand for the entirety of your life, does not erase the being of God. It merely just makes you regret all of your decisions when God tells you, sorry, you cannot enter my kingdom. You wanted separation from me, now you will have it for eternity, and your quarantine quarters will be in the lake of fire and brimstone.

  • @aliceash9515
    @aliceash9515 Рік тому +66

    Are we not gonna talk abt how he said "there are a few of us that act like lizards" ?!?!?!

    • @calebhumphrey8220
      @calebhumphrey8220 Рік тому +10

      He just admitted to being a lizard person

    • @gasun1274
      @gasun1274 Рік тому

      a lot of christians act like pigs though

    • @user-gc9qn4us4p
      @user-gc9qn4us4p 10 місяців тому

      that was the first thing i caught, hmm

    • @ITGOES80808
      @ITGOES80808 5 місяців тому +1

      I mean there are.

    • @ITGOES80808
      @ITGOES80808 5 місяців тому +2

      @@calebhumphrey8220huh?

  • @dman7668
    @dman7668 Рік тому +232

    Props to both men for having a respectful disagreement about what they think and why they think it. Let people make up their own minds.

    • @MEGA1FILM
      @MEGA1FILM Рік тому +15

      Billsh is not anywhere near respectful. He can't fathom that anything he vomits could be wrong..

    • @SR-ry6hs
      @SR-ry6hs Рік тому

      ​@MEGA1FILM or is it so scary to you that you have spent years being close minded, and hearing someone use actual evidence to prove a point that you resort to petty verbal assault? Show with evidence that Bill is wrong in his claims. ... I'm waiting. Do more research. Read more than one book. Don't be afraid of change. It's gonna be okay. When you finally start thinking for yourself instead of blindly following these theist hacks you'll feel free. You'll discover a whole world of knowledge that has been hidden from you. Try to be open minded. Bill Nye is not the spokes person for science. He is just one person trying to help open eyes to the wonderful world of scientific research and discovery. It is amazing over here, come join us. :)

    • @savannahstuart5319
      @savannahstuart5319 Рік тому +44

      @@MEGA1FILM because it’s backed in science. like peer reviewed long researched SCIENCE

    • @gavriecox2229
      @gavriecox2229 Рік тому

      @@savannahstuart5319 It’s backed-up by pseudoscience, assumptions and great leaps of faith to believe in what Bill Nye believes.

    • @monster__energy
      @monster__energy Рік тому +6

      @@MEGA1FILMneither can theists fathom that what they believe could be wrong.

  • @Gabriel.Ponce.De.Leon.777
    @Gabriel.Ponce.De.Leon.777 11 місяців тому +21

    One thing I learned in Christ is not to argue with stubbornness, let God treat with him.

    • @TeleTio
      @TeleTio 11 місяців тому +1

      The proper way to say express the last part is woudl be "... let God *deal with him". 👍

    • @Carisneat123
      @Carisneat123 2 місяці тому +1

      Yup, thus says Matthew 10:14
      "And whoever will not receive you nor hear your words, when you depart from that house or city, shake off the dust from your feet."
      When Jesus went to his home town He even decided He could do no good there and decided to leave since the people had already formed an opinion of Him as a poor carpenter's son.
      "Now He could do no mighty work there, except that He laid His hands on a few sick people and healed them. And He marveled because of their unbelief. Then He went about the villages in a circuit, teaching." Mark 6:5-6

    • @rednaxelaproductions7560
      @rednaxelaproductions7560 Місяць тому

      Ken ham was the stubborn one… y’all will blame anyone who goes against your confirmation bias 💀

    • @RestoredRandom
      @RestoredRandom Місяць тому

      Don't let any contradictory info in 😂

  • @Dom92738
    @Dom92738 5 місяців тому +6

    “I mean there’s a few of us”, seems like lizards had me dying

  • @mitchb12487
    @mitchb12487 Рік тому +688

    I've never seen Bill want to hit someone so bad!😂

    • @keltonsanders
      @keltonsanders Рік тому +65

      Ken asked questions like he dropped the mic, “so we’re related to plants?”
      Bill: yes? Lol

    • @mikewyckoff1123
      @mikewyckoff1123 Рік тому +1

      hahahahahahahaha

    • @jeremiah5319
      @jeremiah5319 Рік тому

      I wish he had hit him... hard. That would be a fun lawsuit to watch. Oh, well. :)

    • @hcderksen
      @hcderksen Рік тому +12

      Would have been nice to see him try. He would lose. He is a fool.

    • @hcderksen
      @hcderksen Рік тому +12

      You need to understand this, God's creating everything was a MIRACLE.

  • @user-fv5ms4sz8e
    @user-fv5ms4sz8e Рік тому +189

    I've found, that when people tell you they are something specific, (like being open-minded) that they are often not what they claim.

    • @satores1918
      @satores1918 Рік тому +8

      well believing we are descended from Martians is pretty open minded if you ask me especially since science has yet to tell us that

    • @thatskasher
      @thatskasher Рік тому +12

      @@satores1918 wait so a sky person just poofed everything into existence is more believable ?

    • @evangalinsky2499
      @evangalinsky2499 Рік тому

      ​@@satores1918 no one thinks that but okay

    • @user-fv5ms4sz8e
      @user-fv5ms4sz8e Рік тому +6

      @@thatskasher This is where you fail, because you equate the weakness of man, to the attributes of God. God is power, a power we haven't yet discovered, nor may never will, but a power beyond sky people ability. Beyond the ability of absolutely nothing, coming into existence all on its own, with no volition or reason.

    • @thatskasher
      @thatskasher Рік тому +3

      @@user-fv5ms4sz8e & whats your reasoning for coming to this conclusion? A book ?

  • @iAdden
    @iAdden 6 місяців тому +9

    12:16 Aron Ra just in the back minding his business 😂

  • @anja0106
    @anja0106 8 місяців тому +39

    His “when you die your done” question can be one simple answer: I don’t want future people to endure suffering based on my selfish choices in this life. Period.

    • @MachinedInWood
      @MachinedInWood 7 місяців тому

      Nobody, not one person anywhere on this earth, is now or ever will suffer from climate change, especially if you believe in what Nye is preaching. If you do, you MUST believe that people will evolve to be able to thrive in whatever climate the world throws at them. If the oceans rise, people and animals will adapt and reorganize themselves. Science tells is that has ALWAYS been the case, but it will no longer be the case going forward. It’s a moronic argument.

    • @TheNewNationPodcast
      @TheNewNationPodcast 6 місяців тому

      Life is suffering my man

    • @skueky8181
      @skueky8181 6 місяців тому +7

      But why does suffering matter? Who cares if it doesn’t matter in the end? If we have no purpose, then why not let everyone suffer? According to the belief in nothing, it doesn’t matter. We’d all end up in non existence anyway, no matter what.

    • @lordzanthartehallen8963
      @lordzanthartehallen8963 6 місяців тому +2

      @@skueky8181empathy man, treat people like you treat yourself, plain and simple

    • @skueky8181
      @skueky8181 6 місяців тому +7

      @@lordzanthartehallen8963 and empathy came out of a void of nothingness? Out of tiny little particle fluctuations? Empathy is only from God. The Bible says we are made in His likeness. We are like God to a certain point, as in we are capable of having some of the same attributes. For example, empathy. So without God, we have no emotion.

  • @bobbycone2
    @bobbycone2 Рік тому +339

    Ken literally talked about his legacy and leaving something for his kids in one part and then consistently asks Bill why anything matters if you just die and then your done.

    • @strat1080
      @strat1080 Рік тому +29

      I don’t you understand the point he’s getting at

    • @reubenfreer3230
      @reubenfreer3230 Рік тому +75

      @@jacrich699 Ham believes in god that’s why he wants to pass on legacy but Bill is saying that their is no god, which means we’re just here for no higher purpose. So then what’s the point of anything. What’s the point in even trying to make right in the world if it’s all pointless is what he’s getting at. It’s a rational question to point out his error in rational thinking. The comment makes no sense because they have two completely different views and he’s simply pointing out how illogical that we just go nowhere when we die.

    • @jjphank
      @jjphank Рік тому

      Matter and energy cannot be created nor destroyed, therefore no matter nor energy would’ve existed to do the causing. Consequently, whatever did cause the universe to exist, would need to be immaterial and exist beyond time and space! Genesis 1: 1 God creates time space and matter!
      Entropy is somewhat opposite of evolution and why did this come into the universe if everything’s getting better. Genesis 2:17 says death came into the universe through the first sin!
      First two chapters of the Bible not the 500th chapter or the thousandth chapter; explain what evolutionists have not explained;, The first two laws of thermodynamics!
      DNA does not auto encrypt, it did not write itself the code writer is outside of the code. 3300 billion lines of computer code in 1 humans DNA, would fill the Grand Canyon 50 times of Books, let alone plant and animal DNA and it did not write itself! One person‘s DNA could stretch to the sun and back 61 times! Psalm 139:16 “in my members you have written many books“.
      John 21:25 “I suppose everything Jesus did the world will not have enough room for the Books, telling of it“
      Job 38:35 “were you there when I created the lightnings and they say ‘here we are!”’ This is God talking to Job!
      3300 years later, James Maxwell discovers that light rays and electricity are two forms of the same thing!
      The Bible Predicted telecommunications

    • @savannahstuart5319
      @savannahstuart5319 Рік тому +63

      @@reubenfreer3230 just because you aren’t a christian or believe in God doesn’t mean you completely lack purpose or morals of any kind.

    • @reubenfreer3230
      @reubenfreer3230 Рік тому +42

      @@savannahstuart5319 yes it does, their is no basis for what is moral or immoral, it makes it all relative with no higher truth, which we all know is bs 😂 plus your moral standards come from religion lol and your purpose is self made if there is no god, which means your making purpose literally to give meaning to your meaningless life. But with god everything has meaning.

  • @michaelbradley6004
    @michaelbradley6004 Рік тому +296

    It hurts my heart to listen to people with hard hearts and closed minds. Pearls to swine.

    • @face....
      @face.... Рік тому +12

      It also hurts cos this guy's my childhood :(

    • @elielrodriguez2009
      @elielrodriguez2009 Рік тому +12

      Ken ham should've used ray comfort approach..the law to show him how guilty we are ..like Paul said the law is a school master to bring us to christ

    • @michaelszczys8316
      @michaelszczys8316 Рік тому +7

      It is very good to teach and preach the Bible. However,
      I wish someone would give Bill a good serious argument without ever going to the Bible. Real science versus make believe science.
      The Bible just makes him put his fingers in his ears and scream LA LA LA LA

    • @darinb.3273
      @darinb.3273 Рік тому +3

      ​@@michaelszczys8316That means (this person) would be appealing to a human authority, therefore dismissing God all together. To say another way such a person would be placing authority over God.

    • @michaelszczys8316
      @michaelszczys8316 Рік тому

      @@darinb.3273 beside the whole point

  • @grouchyolddan
    @grouchyolddan 3 місяці тому +3

    "give me an explanation" he starts to explain "no no no" doesn't let him finish a thought

  • @mariajoseuseromatute515
    @mariajoseuseromatute515 11 місяців тому +4

    Use your own eyes. No country has ever built an all wood ship the size of the Ark. What you can see is a poured concrete foundation, beam on post framing, bolted and articulated steel gussets, etc. The structure was built like a barn/building and decorated to look like a ship.

  • @lukehelleksen68
    @lukehelleksen68 Рік тому +276

    He said they didn't have tools to build the ark... explain how ancient Egyptians cut massive stones that weighed tens of thousands of pounds and moved them 300 miles to build the pyramids. He can't.

    • @ausis6214
      @ausis6214 Рік тому +15

      Go look it up.

    • @lukehelleksen68
      @lukehelleksen68 Рік тому +27

      @@ausis6214 I'm a geographer. It should be easy to explain to me, go ahead.

    • @Kentmadden
      @Kentmadden Рік тому +10

      Can you explain how they made the pyramids?

    • @Never-EndingLight777
      @Never-EndingLight777 Рік тому +23

      @@Kentmadden Fallen Angel technology.

    • @gweilospur5877
      @gweilospur5877 Рік тому +17

      Can Ken explain how the pyramids are older than the supposed flood? Or how there is a living tree that is older than the biblical age of the universe?

  • @tatertot7112
    @tatertot7112 Рік тому +677

    I love how he tells Nye “you have no absolute proof so you could be wrong” but then speaks about god as if it’s absolute proof.

    • @zerkeva1406
      @zerkeva1406 Рік тому +174

      Cause he is tho. Theres more evidence to god than anything else

    • @ErorrTNT
      @ErorrTNT Рік тому +74

      ​@@zerkeva1406 yeah I met the guy in 12BC, he was pretty chill back then, but after his first kid he stopped coming to our parties and started focusing on his work.

    • @juliebaker6969
      @juliebaker6969 Рік тому +71

      And he COULD be wrong, and so could WE who believe in GOD. But the difference between those two is one that Bill Nye and anyone else that believe in current scientific theories don't recognize.
      That difference is that IF THEY'RE correct, then it makes no difference WHAT you believe. We'll all end up in the same place, doing the same thing REGARDLESS of what we believe.....6 feet under turning into worm food. So why do they fight our beliefs so hard? What harm does our beliefs do? Absolutely NONE whatsoever.
      But if WE'RE the ones that are right, those who DON'T believe are SCREWED! I DON'T think I'm wrong that God is real, and there are a LOT of science based reasons why I believe that. But taking scientific theories at face value requires every bit as much faith as believing in God.
      And after all is said and done, since BOTH require faith, I'd rather believe in GOD and be wrong, than believe in the current scientific theories and be wrong. If I'M wrong I loose NOTHING, but if I'm RIGHT, anyone that DIDN'T make the right choice is HOSED! And they have no excuse, THEY'RE the ones that CHOSE to ignore the warnings.🤔🤷

    • @elizastarzz5926
      @elizastarzz5926 Рік тому

      Maybe the Bible is a man made construct to keep certain ppl in line, and keep us from discovering we are God?

    • @hcderksen
      @hcderksen Рік тому +29

      If you were actually interested you would spend some time reading the Bible. Then if you are a chosen one, you just might start to understand what you're reading.
      Then you would know that not only does His exist, He just may want you to get to know Him.

  • @jerrylanglois7892
    @jerrylanglois7892 4 місяці тому +47

    I like the way nye says, as a scientist, '' we don't know '' -- whereas ham never admits not knowing because '' the bible says ''...

    • @alistair6914
      @alistair6914 3 місяці тому +7

      Ken is more humble

    • @Gomd6996
      @Gomd6996 3 місяці тому +12

      @@alistair6914so wrong lol

    • @jerrylanglois7892
      @jerrylanglois7892 2 місяці тому

      @@alistair6914 You completely missed my point, you are really stupid !

    • @rednaxelaproductions7560
      @rednaxelaproductions7560 Місяць тому +1

      @@alistair6914 bro did you watch the video💀 he interrupted bill every second he got

    • @aahhhhhhhhhhhhh
      @aahhhhhhhhhhhhh 2 дні тому

      ​@@alistair6914Yikes. That is such a lie. Wheres the humbleness at all.

  • @ricecake3215
    @ricecake3215 3 місяці тому +4

    I wish Ken would listen a bit more

  • @bradstevens4699
    @bradstevens4699 Рік тому +51

    Ken is saying If there’s no proof it’s has to be God. Bill is saying we don’t know, that’s why it’s important to find a way to discover that.

    • @kevinmiller6443
      @kevinmiller6443 9 місяців тому

      This is a classic strawman. Ken appeals to the evidence of creation within our dimension (DNA, Sociology, "Natural" Laws, etc.) as a foundation for his belief in a creator (Law of Causality). Bill Nye is proudly making a claim that there is no God (atheism), which is not the same as humbly saying "I don't know" (agnosticism).

    • @nippymutt9018
      @nippymutt9018 9 місяців тому

      Bill is saying if there's no proof it can't be God.

    • @aaronruss6331
      @aaronruss6331 4 місяці тому +4

      The issue with that logic is that it makes no sense. Do you have to prove that a statement makes sense?

    • @jotunthe11thhyman65
      @jotunthe11thhyman65 3 місяці тому +6

      Ken is saying that he starts with a belief in the Bible and God can do anything he wants to. Bill is trying to say he starts with the evidence, but in reality he is probably simply starting with his belief in evolution.

    • @glentomkins3426
      @glentomkins3426 2 місяці тому +1

      Actually I never heard Ken say that there is no proof. If you assume that God exists, the whole universe becomes proof of his existence. I just wonder why Bill hates God enough to want to argue him out of existence. Maybe he views the world through the lens of a bad personal experience. My heart goes out to him, but he needs to think differently.

  • @michellegoad1052
    @michellegoad1052 Рік тому +6

    Bill Nye, Your smugness make me want to gag. We’re kin to bananas? You’re bananas!

    • @Amanda-zg9pz
      @Amanda-zg9pz Рік тому +2

      Yes signifiant portions of our DNA are similar to the DNA of a Banana. Like all of the dna that builds our specific cellular structure, all of the DNA needed to build the sodium-potassium pump which is needed by all living things, numerous other proteins that allow for any life form to exist, etc…. Study a bio text book, learn more about DNA and you can better educate yourself on the subject before dismissing it without understanding it.

    • @MrFossil367ab45gfyth
      @MrFossil367ab45gfyth Рік тому +1

      Study biology, evolution and DNA.

    • @Polyphemus47
      @Polyphemus47 4 місяці тому

      It'll never happen. @@MrFossil367ab45gfyth

    • @car823
      @car823 Місяць тому +1

      Well, when you spent years of your life trying to educate the population, but still have to deal with this. I would imagine it would drive some people into insanity; in Bill's case, frustration. Who could blame him!

    • @aahhhhhhhhhhhhh
      @aahhhhhhhhhhhhh 2 дні тому

      Please go back to school

  • @BobZombie8806
    @BobZombie8806 11 місяців тому +18

    16:49 my favorite part 😂

  • @WHR0306
    @WHR0306 Рік тому +107

    Anyone notice that Ken changes the subject wherever Nye brings up a good point?

    • @metalfilmsofficial9468
      @metalfilmsofficial9468 11 місяців тому +48

      No but I did notice the opposite.

    • @JSt3pz
      @JSt3pz 11 місяців тому +37

      It’s the opposite

    • @drawingdragon
      @drawingdragon 11 місяців тому +5

      A good point like "We might be Martians and I'm going to look for evidence that we're Martians despite there bring no reason to believe there will be evidence of this" while simultaneously ignoring the actual provable fact that all human beings belong to the same species and therefore had a common (human) ancestor...?

    • @yxle4070
      @yxle4070 11 місяців тому +4

      @@metalfilmsofficial9468ofc you did

    • @jusfugly
      @jusfugly 10 місяців тому +10

      @@JSt3pz Ken Ham has never brought up a good point in his entire life.

  • @FiadeAnimashaun
    @FiadeAnimashaun Рік тому +53

    How can Ken point to the girl and say to Bill 'Is she an animal'🤣🤣🤣

    • @thomasmaughan4798
      @thomasmaughan4798 11 місяців тому +5

      "How can Ken point to the girl and say to Bill 'Is she an animal'"
      The mechanism is fairly complex so it is probably something best left to your doctoral thesis in neurology. Or just go with the answer, Yes, she is a mammal.

    • @marsmars9130
      @marsmars9130 11 місяців тому +5

      Bill would say you cant say its a girl

    • @Adam_A_Christian
      @Adam_A_Christian 10 місяців тому +3

      @marsmars9130 Good point. Strange how we live in a time where we supposedly can't know a girl is a girl, but the science on where we came from and how is so settled that we can't possibly believe it required actual intelligence to create everything we see, hear, touch, taste, feel and experience. Hmmm...

    • @dantasticmania8728
      @dantasticmania8728 10 місяців тому

      I don't but why does Bill believes gender is fluid and GMO don't exist?

    • @onbored9627
      @onbored9627 10 місяців тому +2

      @@marsmars9130 LOL and in 1 sentence Ken is now unarguably the most rational person in the debate.

  • @marcj3682
    @marcj3682 Рік тому +37

    Bill Nye sends a birthday card to his bananna.

  • @precisiondefensegroup3688
    @precisiondefensegroup3688 11 місяців тому +10

    That sweet little girl brought tears to my eyes.

  • @AlainBoudard
    @AlainBoudard Рік тому +7

    Why does anything matter ultimately... That's an excellent question ♥️

    • @junodonatus4906
      @junodonatus4906 10 місяців тому

      It is but that's not up to us. We make it matter for ourselves. Science is only concerned with how things work and not making us feel good.

    • @rednaxelaproductions7560
      @rednaxelaproductions7560 Місяць тому

      There’s no real point, scientifically speaking. If you want to kill someone it doesn’t “scientifically” matter. But you know it’s “wrong” because it harms the species by ending a life, and by having people cast you out of society as a murderer. In prehistoric times that would mean you may not survive on your own. The point is to survive. It just is. Did you take biology in high school?

    • @aahhhhhhhhhhhhh
      @aahhhhhhhhhhhhh 2 дні тому

      ​@@junodonatus4906We dont have to feel good

  • @MeglynLad
    @MeglynLad Рік тому +21

    "your scientists and your staff, respectfully, are completely incompetent."
    Bill Nye channeling Ricky Bobby...

  • @JoJo-gd8yz
    @JoJo-gd8yz Рік тому +59

    No life after death but there is life after nothing?

    • @georgem5589
      @georgem5589 Рік тому +2

      Well said!

    • @daviddavenport9350
      @daviddavenport9350 Рік тому +1

      "We are such stuff as dreams are made of; and our little lives are rounded by a sleep".......need I state the author's name for you?

    • @loreebrew38
      @loreebrew38 Рік тому +2

      Excellent point!

    • @official2mt37
      @official2mt37 Рік тому +7

      except there wasn't nothing, nobody ever said there was nothing apart from your magic book, there was a quantum state

    • @loreebrew38
      @loreebrew38 Рік тому +1

      @@official2mt37 And who put that quantum state there? , If there was something, something or someone made it. If there was nothing, and then something appears, someone made it.

  • @eduardopena5893
    @eduardopena5893 9 місяців тому +79

    "Trust the science."
    "Well, there are lots of scientists that would disagree with you."
    "Well, they're incompetent."
    Great argument.....

    • @user-wx5pm1xs6j
      @user-wx5pm1xs6j 9 місяців тому

      The only scientists that disagree with the theory of evolution are people who base of a book of unverified nonsense they will say the demonstrations of evolution done IN THE LAB are not a change in kind and will then refuse to answer what a kind even is, so in this regard they are incompetent

    • @fohrum4757
      @fohrum4757 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@stevebozWhat exactly does that say?

    • @bilbothegamerandtraveler2634
      @bilbothegamerandtraveler2634 8 місяців тому +1

      There is no incompetent scientists?

    • @eduardopena5893
      @eduardopena5893 8 місяців тому

      @@bilbothegamerandtraveler2634 It is the assumption that only scientists that support Ken's arguments are the incompetent ones.
      And it is, "There ARE no incompetent scientists?"

    • @fleshanthos
      @fleshanthos 8 місяців тому +9

      @@bilbothegamerandtraveler2634 That's right. If you're incompetent, you will get the wrong answer, and be quickly exposed by your fellows. That's how peer-review works.

  • @BigBlackGuyReviews
    @BigBlackGuyReviews 11 місяців тому +4

    I remember school always willing to play Bill Nye The Science Guy, regardless of the school subject of the time... His apparent "beliefs" explains why Christianity has been on a decline. Look how upset these convos make him.😳👀😅

    • @michaelsears6702
      @michaelsears6702 9 місяців тому +3

      It really does. He doesn’t like God being brought up. I remember when he was asked God he said he didn’t want to talk about that.

  • @rickv8495
    @rickv8495 Рік тому +15

    Did anybody notice in the beginning he said we're all animals and some of us are "lizards"

    • @gweilospur5877
      @gweilospur5877 Рік тому +3

      No, he said mammals. Lizards aren’t mammals.

    • @Tweckyy
      @Tweckyy Рік тому

      You might be autistic, he was joking

    • @GG-fb9yr
      @GG-fb9yr Рік тому +3

      @@gweilospur5877 Bill said "well of course, there's a few of us that seem like lizards." Directly insulting Ken, and Ken ignores it and continues on in his attempt to have a rational discussion. Start at 0:30

    • @gweilospur5877
      @gweilospur5877 Рік тому

      @@GG-fb9yr There is nothing rational in the mind of anybody who believes the universe is 6000 years old.

    • @michaelsears6702
      @michaelsears6702 9 місяців тому +1

      @GH-fb9yr yeah, it really does show who the mature one of the two.

  • @mmmfriedtaters
    @mmmfriedtaters Рік тому +234

    I believe individuals, such as Bill Nye, can not be persuaded/convinced by intellectual argument. It can only be God's internal work that will ultimately "convince" them.

    • @chriskitchen4772
      @chriskitchen4772 Рік тому +6

      Yes, it is spiritual, I agree.

    • @christclinger6540
      @christclinger6540 Рік тому +7

      It’s by the Spirit that one is justified, sanctified and ultimately glorified. We can only be seed sowers. It’s never by human persuasion that one comes to Christ. It’s by the Holy Spirit’s gift of faith. That’s why you can have two intelligent and intellectual men on opposite sides of this issue. Both are smart and competent but one has a heart of flesh and the other a heart of stone. Without the Holy Spirit none of us would come to Christ on our own volition. Humans choose sin every time. But God has chosen us and that is a beautiful thing!

    • @cs5250
      @cs5250 Рік тому +4

      Bill Nye is always open for intellectual debate. These two are both absolutely convinced by their own experience that they will not budge on what they believe.

    • @EvanMoon
      @EvanMoon Рік тому +1

      It is the difference between two friends talking verse two opponents jarring before a fight. Are you willing to listen to other ideas or are you locked in and showing up to fight

    • @jacobcollins2861
      @jacobcollins2861 Рік тому +4

      That is true for everyone. No one comes to God by their own reason.

  • @BlitzTheFoxi
    @BlitzTheFoxi 8 місяців тому +40

    I love how they cut out the parts where bill gives the best evidence 💀

    • @jacobstravail
      @jacobstravail 4 місяці тому +2

      ? He can't answer simple questions like any other SH I've encountered

    • @aahhhhhhhhhhhhh
      @aahhhhhhhhhhhhh 2 дні тому

      ​@@jacobstravail? What are the simple questions?

  • @heavymetalnewsdesk
    @heavymetalnewsdesk 2 дні тому

    Look at bill's ears, he's got vampire ears

  • @randallrutherford1384
    @randallrutherford1384 Рік тому +49

    Bill said “ Adam and Eve were hard to believe but he legitimately believes we are from Mars”?

    • @nickt.7305
      @nickt.7305 Рік тому +17

      And we’re related to bananas.

    • @BrianBadondeBo
      @BrianBadondeBo Рік тому

      Adam and eve are impossible to take seriously, and he doesn't state it as fact, but, it does remain possible that early martian fragments landed on earth with microbes spawned life on earth is what he said. Still wating for proof of a talking snake

    • @randallrutherford1384
      @randallrutherford1384 Рік тому +1

      @@nickt.7305 IKR!

    • @Jeremiah17910
      @Jeremiah17910 Рік тому

      @Nick T. amazing, someone as aducated as Bill, would believe that he is related to a banana. That's what happens when God gives someone over to a depraved mind because they refuse to aknowladge their Creator God.

    • @BrianBadondeBo
      @BrianBadondeBo Рік тому +14

      @@Jeremiah17910 all life is related. That includes humans and bananas. The great thing about science is that unlike religion, it doesn't insist that you keep your mind small in order for your amazement to be big

  • @Homo_sAPEien
    @Homo_sAPEien Рік тому +5

    What’s the point of life, if you are gone when you die? My answer would be just to have fun. I have fun while alive, and that’s what motivates me to continue living.

    • @islowthingsdown
      @islowthingsdown Рік тому +3

      Dude same! I'm tired of the people in my life telling me it's wrong to murder people with an axe. It's fun for me, so I figure I might as well enjoy my life while I can since I'll die one day, plus it's not like they have the capacity to care once they're dead.

    • @Homo_sAPEien
      @Homo_sAPEien Рік тому +2

      @@islowthingsdown Huh? Is that supposed to be a joke? What are you getting at?

  • @temporary4384
    @temporary4384 Місяць тому +3

    Not surprising if bill git angry it was watching him give a lecture to chickens

  • @Tommytoolsqueezer
    @Tommytoolsqueezer 14 днів тому

    “We come from Martians” 😂😂😂

  • @jimmiewomble416
    @jimmiewomble416 Рік тому +76

    Ken doesn't mind interrupting Bill at all. He doesn't want to give him a chance to speak.

    • @averagefemale6757
      @averagefemale6757 Рік тому +8

      It pissed me off so much!

    • @TheThirdNight
      @TheThirdNight Рік тому +16

      Because Ken knows he’ll get destroyed if he lets Bill respond fully or answers his questions. Good strategy to avoid looking like you’re wrong.

    • @BBQPorkSandwich3
      @BBQPorkSandwich3 Рік тому +6

      @@TheThirdNight you poor soul

    • @drawingdragon
      @drawingdragon 11 місяців тому +5

      We must have watched different videos because all I heard was Ken trying to actually press Bill for an explanation or a point and Bill just randomly diverting to "I went to Japan once" and "climate change tho"

    • @michaelsears6702
      @michaelsears6702 9 місяців тому +3

      They both interrupted each other 😂 Ken and Bill are both guilty for this. Don’t act like Bill didn’t do it.

  • @mathewlanier8352
    @mathewlanier8352 Рік тому +32

    The second law of thermodynamics holds that entropy increases; that is, systems over time become more disordered. Therefore, both evolutionary theory and the second law of thermodynamics cannot both be correct.
    … just a thought

    • @daviddavenport9350
      @daviddavenport9350 Рік тому

      ONLY in a closed environment.....that wonderful energy generator the Sun makes earth an open environment......please dont ape the incompetent creationist pseudo scientists.

    • @lawrencecigary2134
      @lawrencecigary2134 Рік тому

      What's science got to do with it. There's more on his side so he is right.🤗

    • @BrianBadondeBo
      @BrianBadondeBo Рік тому +5

      You have to take into account closed systems vs open systems. Plus, don't you worry, disorder is coming. The sun will burn out. The universe will expand infinitely into nothingness. There's no contradiction

    • @aeronblitz9347
      @aeronblitz9347 Рік тому +3

      ​@@BrianBadondeBo Except there is because everything is supposed to degrade over time, yet we have evolutionists claiming that somehow creatures can invent new genetic information via luck and random chance and improve over time.

    • @aeronblitz9347
      @aeronblitz9347 Рік тому +3

      ​@@lawrencecigary2134 Not really. Bill didnt show a lot science but a lot of faith in his beliefs.

  • @adrianagflores5587
    @adrianagflores5587 4 місяці тому +4

    I’ve watched this more than once and I just noticed that Aaron Ra was there.

    • @fourierrocket
      @fourierrocket 3 місяці тому

      I'll bet he was talking about eukaryotes.

  • @RayVidsOfDestruction
    @RayVidsOfDestruction 7 місяців тому +8

    The difference between the two is Bill is willing to believe if there is evidence and is not really trying to enforce atheism in his teachings. He literally is going by what he's seen and learned. Mr. Ham is just trying to save someone who is not at all in any trouble he's open minded like he said

    • @skueky8181
      @skueky8181 6 місяців тому +1

      Why would any believer have an open mind against God? That’s disgusting

    • @ITGOES80808
      @ITGOES80808 5 місяців тому +3

      @@skueky8181that’s literally what having an “open mind” is all about, it’s about being willing to change your beliefs based on evidence.

    • @1eyedjacksRwild
      @1eyedjacksRwild 2 місяці тому

      In reality Bill rejects any evidence that doesn't support his belief system in naturalism. He is committed to evolutionary theory even though it is weak and illogical.

    • @williamreeve5376
      @williamreeve5376 2 місяці тому +1

      When someone's life and eternal existence is on the line and you are given a mandate from the LORD of all creation to spread the message of salvation, you obey it.

    • @rednaxelaproductions7560
      @rednaxelaproductions7560 Місяць тому

      @@skueky8181 so you aren’t willing to change (it’s disgusting 🤢) , but demand that other people change?

  • @nottavegan7311
    @nottavegan7311 Рік тому +12

    "What makes you think we're not related *to bananas?"*
    I'm sorry, but that was the last sentence I'd assume from a scientist when explaining existence.
    Edit: He didn't mean we're family but the sentence just made me die.
    Related ≠family

    • @nottavegan7311
      @nottavegan7311 Рік тому

      Ok turns he isn't a scientist, but anyone who actually believes that we are any way related to a flipping BERRY is 🤪

    • @ilovecheese9791
      @ilovecheese9791 Рік тому +5

      @@nottavegan7311 but we are 🤨 and how isn’t he a scientist

    • @nottavegan7311
      @nottavegan7311 Рік тому

      @@ilovecheese9791 how in the world can u say with a straight face that a human being with flesh and a brain, was created using the same system as a banana. Similar circumstances produce similar outcomes. It makes no sense for your banana germ/dna/whatever to be remotely close to human.

    • @nottavegan7311
      @nottavegan7311 Рік тому

      @@ilovecheese9791 also bill Nye has no scientific credentials

    • @victorias187
      @victorias187 Рік тому +4

      But we are related to bananas. We share 60 percent of identical DNA to them

  • @braydenheadrick4778
    @braydenheadrick4778 Рік тому +76

    Technically bill nye isn’t a scientist he is an engineer. But he has clearly studied other sciences a lot

    • @PossiblyStephen
      @PossiblyStephen Рік тому +3

      He definitely carried most of science class for sure

    • @sixxfinga1864
      @sixxfinga1864 Рік тому +5

      Look up what a chemical engineer is

    • @Yohanyothan
      @Yohanyothan Рік тому +3

      @@sixxfinga1864not a scientist. Amongst those who boast the nomen of scientist, we all maintain scholarly work and credentials. He does not publish. Sure, you can say he studied science and makes science work as an engineer, but he does not conduct research or engage in the scientific process beyond the point of theory.

    • @sixxfinga1864
      @sixxfinga1864 Рік тому +3

      @@Yohanyothan he has a credible understanding of the subject matter

    • @Yohanyothan
      @Yohanyothan Рік тому +2

      @@sixxfinga1864 which makes him a student or teacher even, but nothing more. Scientists contribute to the knowledge base.

  • @MrGrayDog
    @MrGrayDog 9 місяців тому +8

    I love how the guy on the right keeps asking Bill questions and he keeps interrupting Bill's answers.

  • @jesusfirst3426
    @jesusfirst3426 3 місяці тому

    I’m not going to let this guy named Bill tell me that I’m related to a banana.

  • @dwainfrett5385
    @dwainfrett5385 Рік тому +17

    19:30 I went to college too 😂 I love that answer

    • @andynaz5631
      @andynaz5631 Рік тому

      When I was in college Josh McDowell spoke on the main mall of the campus. The crowd was orderly, asked questions some politely disagreed with him, and all were respectful. Now, 40 years later, the students would all but stone a mall preacher at the same university.
      Jesus is coming soon.

    • @rusher8816
      @rusher8816 Рік тому +5

      He got him there 😂

    • @kevinmiller6443
      @kevinmiller6443 9 місяців тому +1

      LOL. And Nye immediately tried to recover by committing the argumentum ad populum fallacy. THIS is why it is critical to recognize logical fallacies and understand how they are used to manipulate people into believing lies.

    • @rednaxelaproductions7560
      @rednaxelaproductions7560 Місяць тому

      He obviously didn’t pay attention in science lectures🌝

  • @petersonnenberg9526
    @petersonnenberg9526 Рік тому +75

    Congratulations to both gentlemen for being gentle men!
    Regarding Bill, I noticed he was kind of pleased with the thought that after death he is not quite done, but he seemed a bit worried a while later when he heard about second death... 😳

    • @daviddavenport9350
      @daviddavenport9350 Рік тому +2

      The earliest Hebrews thought that when you are dead, you're dead.....my father believed that as well!

    • @petersonnenberg9526
      @petersonnenberg9526 Рік тому +4

      @@daviddavenport9350 see 1 Samuel 28 to learn what ancient Hebrews believed and experienced about the dead.

    • @exman66
      @exman66 Рік тому +6

      That's right people like Bill want to have life after death but does not want to belive in the creator and giver of life.

    • @natedogg4651
      @natedogg4651 Рік тому

      Which is exactly the way those ideas are crafted to make you feel as to indoctrinate and control you.

    • @petersonnenberg9526
      @petersonnenberg9526 Рік тому +1

      @@natedogg4651 those are not crafted ideas but rather revealed realities.

  • @bigd8185
    @bigd8185 9 місяців тому +18

    Ham asks a question, Nye answers.
    Nye asks a question, Ham avoids/ignores the question and asks his own question to redirect/misdirect the conversation.
    Bill Nye was so patient in his responses and tolerant of Ham constantly interrupting him.
    Think about it guys, what reason would someone have in avoiding simple, logical, practical questions? Because that person doesn't have a reasonable answer. Plain and simple.

    • @ScottBFree
      @ScottBFree 4 місяці тому

      I understand that you are brainwashed and ignorant, just saying the word "evidence" isn't evidence. The fact is that there is not a single person on earth that can explain how life developed from nonlife.

  • @travisC5
    @travisC5 10 місяців тому +2

    Science changes? No Sir, science doesn't change at all; our understanding of science changes. Science is knowledge of the truth of our environment

  • @mrsshmarek
    @mrsshmarek Рік тому +8

    The conversation around the 5-6 min mark made me think of Ecclesiastes.

  • @stephengilbreath840
    @stephengilbreath840 Рік тому +16

    Poor Bill.

    • @junodonatus4906
      @junodonatus4906 10 місяців тому

      Yes, I feel sorry for anyone confronted face to face with creationist drivel. Sad to see how religion rots the brain.

  • @StoicGroot
    @StoicGroot 5 місяців тому +2

    12:14-12:20. Is that AronRa from Modern Day Debate in the background??

  • @jamesdunnjr.2518
    @jamesdunnjr.2518 Рік тому +6

    That lady with kid recording in the beginning cracks me up. Recorded them on her phone watching them thru her phone and then once she was done recording she didn't look at them once with her own eyes. Only thru a screen. Do people actually live in the moment anymore?

  • @sankap.h.1461
    @sankap.h.1461 Рік тому +119

    I love how Bill Nye says how there are far fewer christian scientists as opposed to secular ones. How does that qualify the secular ones as being correct? Science was often changed by a single person discovering things that contradicted what the rest of scholars believed at the time. The point is that science is not established by consensus or popular vote, so the fact that most scientists claim to be athiest doesn't really prove anything. Science is very political, and anyone even entertaining the possibility of an intelligent designer of the universe is ostracized from the community right away, so that may be a factor.

    • @wet-read
      @wet-read Рік тому

      Fine, at best it is incidental. Francis Collins is a Christian. My understanding is that he does brilliant work.

    • @hisuigayarudo1983
      @hisuigayarudo1983 Рік тому +7

      A claim should be argumentable, but the existence of god cannot be proven and disproven. Just like a claim of mine that a omniscience spoon created the universe. It is not that secularism is right, if we debated a thing that cannot be proven and be disproven then we will just look like a fool. But if somehow a representation of a non-secular idea is presented, then the bible, Quran and other books should not be the symbol of that non-secular idea, but the very concept of god itself.

    • @MichaelMichaelJr
      @MichaelMichaelJr Рік тому

      Good point. Creation scientists are not published because it goes against the narrative that atheists want to teach kids. They deem creation scientists as “non scientific”, though the theory of Macroevolution and old earth and assumptions with no real scientific evidence. The science points to the earth being thousands of years old and there being a global flood about 4,000!years ago.

    • @MichaelMichaelJr
      @MichaelMichaelJr Рік тому +5

      @@globalcoupledances God goes by many names, but not evolution. Macroevolution is an idol god, based on no evidence. Microevolution is real, but only a fool would worship it as a god.

    • @hisuigayarudo1983
      @hisuigayarudo1983 Рік тому +7

      @@MichaelMichaelJr Do you even hear yourself? God goes by many names? Do you imply that a universal omniscience, omnipotent being will care about names? That it would care on our timeline? Our species? Hear yourself before spitting your faulty reasoning.

  • @TheNate206
    @TheNate206 11 місяців тому +1

    Im related to an avocado? I RESENT THAT.

  • @AXE668
    @AXE668 2 місяці тому

    "There's a few of us who seem like lizards..." 🤣🤣

  • @georgebowman1060
    @georgebowman1060 Рік тому +14

    They were both pretty civil.

  • @my1vice
    @my1vice Рік тому +15

    Some folks will always prefer unintelligent design.

    • @middlegroundlogic
      @middlegroundlogic Рік тому +7

      They prefer reality

    • @my1vice
      @my1vice Рік тому +8

      @@middlegroundlogic
      LoL.... Funny.... "Reality".

    • @middlegroundlogic
      @middlegroundlogic Рік тому +6

      @@my1vice Yeah....talking snakes and donkeys

    • @kriegjaeger
      @kriegjaeger Рік тому +13

      @@middlegroundlogic
      The reality is you know nothing about what you mock and dismiss.

    • @nadineball2473
      @nadineball2473 Рік тому +1

      That’s an oxymoron design is always from intelligence! :)

  • @np12804
    @np12804 2 дні тому

    This video sums up all the reasons that I left my Christian upbringing as an evolutionary agnostic atheist. My mom growing up would tell me I was not allowed to believe in both evolution and creation. I never got to the spiritual place where I was able to dismiss the embarrassing hot takes that my Christian circle of influence clung to with bleeding nails. I can't make excuses for people that believe the earth is

  • @deanoaks7690
    @deanoaks7690 Місяць тому +1

    7:47: “Then what’s the purpose of living now anyways”
    A decent question if it wasn’t asked disingenuously. As with much of life complex questions often have disappointingly simple answers. I don’t understand why the answer to what’s the point of living needs a more complex solution than to survive and thrive.
    The beauty of life is that we only have one. We don’t know why we’re here. We don’t know where we’re going, but take what we have make the most out of it.

  • @WideAngleLuis
    @WideAngleLuis Рік тому +135

    Ham - “if nothing happens when we die if we were to die right now why does this conversation even matter?”
    Bill- stares into the distance 😂

    • @eliasjakemoran6434
      @eliasjakemoran6434 Рік тому +31

      I mean nothing really does matter, but we give our lives meaning

    • @bruvvamoff
      @bruvvamoff Рік тому +11

      "If we die and don't remember, then nothing matters."
      I can't think of a more grotesquely selfish statement.
      As though the only point of existence is you.

    • @THE-WAY_THE-TRUTH_THE-LIFE.
      @THE-WAY_THE-TRUTH_THE-LIFE. Рік тому +4

      🤦‍♂️
      You missed the *Entire* point, ​@@bruvvamoff.

    • @bruvvamoff
      @bruvvamoff Рік тому

      @@THE-WAY_THE-TRUTH_THE-LIFE. Explain

    • @THE-WAY_THE-TRUTH_THE-LIFE.
      @THE-WAY_THE-TRUTH_THE-LIFE. Рік тому +3

      @@bruvvamoff
      He was using Bill's own logic against him

  • @VultureXV
    @VultureXV Рік тому +56

    01:38
    I can answer that with a bit more clarity, being a chemistry guy myself. The "information process" that he's talking about is essentially bonds and valence, which is dictated by the number of protons and electrons within a specific element itself. Because each element has it's own mass and 'pull' each of these elements desires completion. Carbon, for example, is a very flexible element as it can maintain a tetrahedral arrangement of bonds or very specific 'strained' bonds. This natural requirement for completion or stability is what led to these elements reacting with one another.
    The rest turns into a situation of 'how' things can bond and considering the primordial crucible that was the universe as it started, plenty of reactions occurred. Later, more complex elements gained better form and function based on those previous connections and also became more complex. Properties like this can easily be seen when you have something like oil and water.
    That same oil and water interaction is how the first lipid membranes ultimately became cellular organisms.

    • @dgcbarton
      @dgcbarton Рік тому

      No, the "information" that Ken is talking about is encoded in the DNA of every living cell. There had to be a source of information for the very first DNA molecule to form. Science has ZERO explanation for this.

    • @micahhull5126
      @micahhull5126 Рік тому +10

      What created the elements?

    • @donaldhall2576
      @donaldhall2576 Рік тому +3

      Why is it that you can do two different carbon tests on same sample and get different ages ?

    • @VultureXV
      @VultureXV Рік тому +2

      @@donaldhall2576
      The amount of electrons and neutrons can vary, but once the protons change it changes the element.

    • @TrevoltIV
      @TrevoltIV Рік тому +11

      None of this is anywhere near convincing enough to warrant DNA coding itself. I’m a programmer so I understand in order to have a code, you must first have an interpreter to understand the code.

  • @kristinamartz348
    @kristinamartz348 2 місяці тому +1

    I was blessed to be able to go to the Ark Encounter a few years ago with some of my family.
    It's a very amazing experience. It is a TON of walking. If you want to look at and read everything you can easily spend the whole day just walking through it and looking at all the information shared.
    It's also neat that they have models of many animals inside.
    Also, there is a mini zoo outside of the ark with a few pretty awesome creatures.
    For those who may have mobility issues, or chronic pain who couldn't handle walking and standing all day, i thought it was So nice that they rent small scooters out.

  • @kevinrhatigan5656
    @kevinrhatigan5656 11 місяців тому +19

    My favourite part was when Ken Ham said "It's Hammin time" and hammed all over the floor

  • @kaymekla5
    @kaymekla5 Рік тому +157

    I think it’s great that Nye went and they were able to have a civil conversation/debate - kudos to both and God Bless us all

    • @lawrencecigary2134
      @lawrencecigary2134 Рік тому +16

      If you ignore Nye's labeling scientists who believe in creation as incompetent , yeah very civil.😳

    • @kaymekla5
      @kaymekla5 Рік тому +3

      @@lawrencecigary2134 at least there was a dialogue in the first place is my point. Okay though

    • @HNIN1973
      @HNIN1973 Рік тому +1

      It seemed like nye had no idea what he was walking into. Like he wanted to leave the whole time once he knew who he was debating with and/or had no idea he'd even be debating. He just seemed to be caught in an awkward situation the whole time

    • @kaymekla5
      @kaymekla5 Рік тому

      @@HNIN1973 I agree to an extent but regardless I’m glad he went through with it to give both sides a voice

    • @HNIN1973
      @HNIN1973 Рік тому

      @Kayla Caffrey I'd agree but kinda seems messed up to blindside someone like that. Neither of them really did either side justice and now Bill just seems like more of a dbag for being unable to even consider the religious argument and no one could blame him. God is the king of Truth and if this rev or whatever he is did indeed mislead Bill into this debate than he does not know God. Not to mention Bill isn't even a real scientist so this should've been a slam dunk.

  • @liamamber87
    @liamamber87 Рік тому +8

    Yes! What makes you think we are not related to bananas? Unreal. Claiming to be wise they became fools

    • @victorias187
      @victorias187 Рік тому +2

      We are related to bananas. We have 60 percent of our DNA in common

    • @Adam_A_Christian
      @Adam_A_Christian 10 місяців тому

      We are made of 70% water. We're not related to the ocean.

    • @rednaxelaproductions7560
      @rednaxelaproductions7560 Місяць тому

      Did you take biology in school? Or did you skip class to smoke weed

    • @INTJ10551
      @INTJ10551 Місяць тому

      It’s a fact, read your science book you ignorant person.

  • @franklinnose
    @franklinnose 5 місяців тому +2

    When did it get HEATED?!

  • @b.c.6070
    @b.c.6070 11 місяців тому +9

    There should be an edit with a # counter that counts all the times Bill jumped topics / cut Ken off while Ken was responding.

    • @LordChick
      @LordChick 11 місяців тому +1

      And vice versa. Ken cut him off just as much.

    • @drawingdragon
      @drawingdragon 11 місяців тому +5

      ​@LordChick Ken "cut him off" when trying to get back to the original point or press for an answer. For example, when he was trying to get to the root cause of "isnt human life ultimately meaningless and we have no moral obligation to provide a better life to our offspring if morality is purely subjective?" and Bill would just randomly go "OK but like...I went to Japan" and Ken would try to repeat the question and not let him change the subject

    • @LordChick
      @LordChick 11 місяців тому +2

      The Drawing Dragon you do realise you can answer questions by using analogies to make it easier for people to understand and relate to. That's what Nye does. If he was actually given the chance to finish a sentence you'd realise that he was about to make a point that answered ham's question

    • @kevinmiller6443
      @kevinmiller6443 9 місяців тому +2

      @@LordChick Prevarication is not the same as an analogy. Ken knows that based upon the evidence provided during their first debate.

    • @nupsi6
      @nupsi6 6 місяців тому +1

      Ken did not really _respond_ to any question he got asked, but always used the opportunity to change subject.

  • @the_jd6967
    @the_jd6967 Рік тому +10

    I suggest making sure to look at both sides with sincerity before making a judgement

    • @lawrencecigary2134
      @lawrencecigary2134 Рік тому +1

      What's there to judge? Both sides are a worldview neither of which can be proven scientifically but one side derides the other as unscientific because more people are on "his side".

    • @TRUTHandLIGHT4809
      @TRUTHandLIGHT4809 Рік тому +4

      Evolution is a BELIEF system, creation is before you. Creation requires no faith or belief, just acceptance of the evidence in front of your face

  • @mateolehman4734
    @mateolehman4734 Рік тому +74

    Bill Nye is a soldier for this. Debating with Ken Ham is a fast track to a severe migraine

    • @micahhull5126
      @micahhull5126 Рік тому +6

      Bill is too smart to learn the truth! I feel sorry for Bill.

    • @micahhull5126
      @micahhull5126 Рік тому

      Bill is too smart to learn the truth! I feel sorry for Bill.

    • @micahhull5126
      @micahhull5126 Рік тому +5

      Bill is the headache !

    • @speakingofman5062
      @speakingofman5062 Рік тому +2

      @@micahhull5126 don’t repeat yourself, it might give you a headache

    • @jeffdoyle1227
      @jeffdoyle1227 Рік тому

      ​@Micah Hull You don't even know the truth. You just know what the Bible says, and the Bible is not truth. It's a man made book. Revised many times.

  • @The_Somewhere_Monarch
    @The_Somewhere_Monarch 7 місяців тому +10

    I would not be able to follow them and listen silently like that without constantly laughing at Bill.

    • @nskdhekahgfd
      @nskdhekahgfd 6 місяців тому +10

      Fr dudes so done with it. Poor bill is debating a man with the logic of a 5th grader 💀

    • @nupsi6
      @nupsi6 6 місяців тому +5

      @@nskdhekahgfdEvery 5th grader should be far ahead of the logic Ken Ham demonstrates.

    • @INTJ10551
      @INTJ10551 Місяць тому

      Perhaps you should laugh at yourself.

  • @lawsonharrison6927
    @lawsonharrison6927 Рік тому +10

    It seems like Kent is saying that if nothing last forever then why care about it? What a bummer way to approach life.

    • @kevinmiller6443
      @kevinmiller6443 9 місяців тому

      That's a strawman. Ken is saying that their is an eternal dimension where our souls go when we die. Therefore, the Christian worldview provides an ontology for our actions making them purposeful. Atheism on the other hand cannot logically claim that we have a purpose if our existence is ultimately futile. The initiative of atheism contradicts its logical outcome, creating a paradox.

    • @lawsonharrison6927
      @lawsonharrison6927 9 місяців тому

      @kevinmiller6443 Yes but you just restated what I interpreted as the same thing. Let me ask you, if the eternal promise of God's love and invitation to be with him was not there would life be worth living?

  • @jessebos5413
    @jessebos5413 Рік тому +59

    I used to LOVE Bill Nye when he was "Bill Nye, the science guy". I stopped worshipping Bill Nye when he "woke" up and publicly declared his distain for people who refused to get vaccinated! Case closed.

    • @tideofamoleculeweonceknew5935
      @tideofamoleculeweonceknew5935 Рік тому +17

      He’s related to a Banana. How smart is that.

    • @daviddavenport9350
      @daviddavenport9350 Рік тому

      Yeah...dont get a vaccine that may save your life....Darwin awards anyone?

    • @blaze46waffle
      @blaze46waffle Рік тому

      No one cares, boomer

    • @matthart4465
      @matthart4465 Рік тому

      You shouldn't have been worshipping any man to begin with.

    • @yvonneplant9434
      @yvonneplant9434 Рік тому +7

      You have likely never have spent a second of your life thinking about smallpox or polio. Why? Because of vaccinations.

  • @junepeyer1200
    @junepeyer1200 3 місяці тому +1

    ❤Fascinating how a non believer’s modus operandi is to rapid fire questions - thus never allowing the other to answer…..

  • @Will_92
    @Will_92 Місяць тому +1

    This was just the weirdest most awkward tour no wonder bill got a bit angry.

  • @joebuck4496
    @joebuck4496 Рік тому +21

    We gotta get these two guys into the Octagon!!! That’s where they can settle this!

  • @diogeneslantern18
    @diogeneslantern18 Рік тому +3

    I don't care for Nye; but Ken Ham comes across as subtly manipulative. The interaction with the girl; the facetious request to pray for Nye; his line of questioning.
    He doesn't come across as interacting in good faith.

  • @juice7546
    @juice7546 11 місяців тому +12

    As a Christian I’m embarrassed by Ken’s performance. Argumentative and pressing. He’s focused on winning an argument and has lost the plot.

    • @thefriesens1071
      @thefriesens1071 11 місяців тому +2

      I like Ken and agree with him, but I wasn't super impressed with him here either. I think the whole thing was kind of awkward. Two guys trying to talk over each other. At least he stayed away from insults though, which Nye had no qualms in doing.

    • @tylerdphoto
      @tylerdphoto 9 місяців тому

      I’m a Christian and I feel it’s weird to bring religion into a science conversation even though it feels right.

    • @michaelsears6702
      @michaelsears6702 9 місяців тому +2

      Well to be fair Ken really didn’t start this argument. Bill did when they went into the Ice Age section.

    • @SpeakMakeGive
      @SpeakMakeGive 9 місяців тому +1

      @@tylerdphoto Well when your religion literally tells you the origin of the universe I would say it's fair to bring it up in a conversation about the origin of the universe.

    • @builderman912
      @builderman912 4 місяці тому

      but then again you arent a Christian.

  • @AHPSC
    @AHPSC 5 місяців тому +2

    My evidence-based belief is: People who promote a religion often benefit from it financially.

  • @videohousejsq
    @videohousejsq Рік тому +22

    Bill just gets completely indignant and parts of this. He contradicts himself at times. 🤣

    • @junodonatus4906
      @junodonatus4906 10 місяців тому +2

      He's just not a good debater. There were moments I wished I was there to answer Ken Ham.

    • @CityChristina
      @CityChristina 9 місяців тому +1

      Because we are tired of dealing with you silly Christians in a world full of knowledge and information.

    • @kevinmiller6443
      @kevinmiller6443 9 місяців тому +3

      @@CityChristina Knowledge and information is only valuable if it is true. Although you make up the zombie masses, the truth is not on your side. After your futility is finally realized, those "silly Christians" will live on in the truth.

    • @Izmooh
      @Izmooh 8 місяців тому

      @@CityChristina Calm.

    • @Mikerille
      @Mikerille 6 місяців тому

      @@kevinmiller6443source: some poor scribe when the average IQ is comparable to the current IQ of the dumbest fucker from highschool that you knew

  • @nickt.7305
    @nickt.7305 Рік тому +222

    Eye opening video. Ken asked Bill, “Why does it (life) matter, ultimately?” According to Bill, our purpose includes passing on genes, having feelings and the possibility of understanding Jupiter at its core. Bill also said, “The meaning of life is to live.” Sadly, in the U.S., we’re seeing homicides at an alarming rate. As of mid-February 2023, there have been over 70 mass shootings. If someone doesn’t believe in a God given purpose, they can’t truly value their life or the life of anyone else. Abortion, homicide, gender reassignment and many other societal ills are the consequences of having a hollow secular perspective like Bill‘s.

    • @andrewlevick1015
      @andrewlevick1015 Рік тому +21

      From a biological point of view, the chief purpose of life is to survive long enough to pass on our genes. It's what animals do. Humans are in the mammal family and are animals- we just have larger brains than other mammals.

    • @michaelszczys8316
      @michaelszczys8316 Рік тому

      I see it as if evolution was all there was to life, then it would be ' survival of the fittest ' for all its worth. There wouldn't be much of civilization as everyone's top priority would be overpowering the guy next to you and taking his food and his woman. Period.
      Nobody would even BEGIN to care a flying fiddler about future generations or any advancement of science.

    • @andrewlevick1015
      @andrewlevick1015 Рік тому +8

      @@michaelszczys8316 Humans have evolved to be social animals (similar to gorillas, for example). Altruistic behaviour and working as a group increases the chance of survival and reproducing. Evolution explains why we like to live in groups. However, evolution has not equipped us to live in very large complex societies. This is why things go so wrong. Our primate psychology can't cope with the demands of complex technologies and societies. We haven't had time to biologically adapt to more complex living.

    • @michaelszczys8316
      @michaelszczys8316 Рік тому

      I think the same might be said for gorilla's as well, if it were just evolution.
      Survival of the fittest.
      Why should they be any different?

    • @andrewlevick1015
      @andrewlevick1015 Рік тому +1

      @@michaelszczys8316 I think people misunderstand evolutionary theory. It's the best adapted for the environmental (selection presuure) that survives long enough to reproduce. The allele frequency increases for advantageous traits.

  • @danielvasquez5141
    @danielvasquez5141 10 місяців тому +4

    Found it ridiculous as soon as he said yes to us being related to plants and bananas

    • @skueky8181
      @skueky8181 6 місяців тому +1

      I know, like what in the world dude. That’s how far Satan has dragged the world down the path of unbelief, sadly

    • @aegis408
      @aegis408 5 місяців тому +1

      We share similar DNA with all life. It’s all the same chemistry is all

    • @aegis408
      @aegis408 5 місяців тому +1

      @@skueky8181So I’m assuming in ur world view, Satan is the embodiment of reason? Understanding how the natural world works isn’t evil, if anything it promotes well-being and welfare for all when we make scientific advances

    • @rednaxelaproductions7560
      @rednaxelaproductions7560 Місяць тому

      Did you take biology in school?

    • @aahhhhhhhhhhhhh
      @aahhhhhhhhhhhhh 2 дні тому +1

      ​@@rednaxelaproductions7560Nah he dropped out and works in construction or something

  • @heavymetalnewsdesk
    @heavymetalnewsdesk 2 дні тому

    Bill's mind is about to go kaboom! HAHAHA

  • @lorialtman3089
    @lorialtman3089 Рік тому +4

    Why did he bring up lizard? Mmm

  • @mrjaydanceman
    @mrjaydanceman Рік тому +5

    It’s belief makes knowing vs knowing makes believing.

  • @271cosme
    @271cosme 10 місяців тому

    Does anyone remember the face palm scene from “Naked Gun”?

  • @northeastrailway.
    @northeastrailway. 3 місяці тому +10

    When my nephew was 4, he had no idea who Jesus was. He says to me "uncle, I have a message for you.", I said"from who?"... he pointed up and said "Jesus loves you and wants you to stop fighting him.".
    It knocked me of my feet and threw me back. I quit drugs right there and went back to God. I am now a Good fearing man and try to do everything his way because my way of life was terrible and miserable.

  • @anything_goes_sidways
    @anything_goes_sidways Рік тому +6

    And this is the “science” we are told to trust…

    • @lukeives2801
      @lukeives2801 Рік тому +2

      Yet wars were started because of religion

    • @anything_goes_sidways
      @anything_goes_sidways Рік тому

      @@lukeives2801 yet number of people killed by atheism Is far far surpasses the number of people killed in all religion wars at all times combined.

    • @AtticTapes14
      @AtticTapes14 11 місяців тому

      Who's side r u on

    • @rednaxelaproductions7560
      @rednaxelaproductions7560 Місяць тому

      Ah yes, the science that uses evidence rather than fairytales is so stupid lol. I don’t like looking at facts, I’d rather believe in stuff that’s impossible to prove. There’s no reason to believe the earth is 6000 years old, but I believe it!!

    • @car823
      @car823 Місяць тому +1

      For over a millennia, people have turned to supernatural phenomena to explain the world around them. People praised the sun, moon, and stars as gods. Protestant Christians believed that other worlds and the sun rotated around Earth, which was a very self-centered view. In a time where religion was heavily present, people came up with a new way to think of the world. A way of questioning things through rigorous testing and proof. This was the scientific method. Galileo, the inventor of one of the first telescopes, was one of the first to challenge these beliefs. He proved that the Earth and other planets were the ones actually rotating around the sun, not the other way around. This man was way ahead of time, so far that the people of his time could not understand. As a result, he was punished; confined to his house until he died. The more we learn about the world through a logical and objective lens, the less we are inclined to blindly follow set traditions. Science in not a tradition or a religion. Its a way of thinking; method/test. Its used to prove things, explore questions, explain phenomena. Religion has failed that test. We have even gone to the moon. There is no existence of a moon god. Another problem is that what we know in science is factual. There are a lot of things we don't know and we aren't afraid to admit it. You can challenge the ideas in science, and if proven right, you will be awarded a Nobel Prize and your name will forever be embedded in history. If you want another reason to prove science's validity, then look around. The cars you drive, the houses you live in, phones, etc. I'm currently in mechanical engineering technologies and we learn about statics, strength of materials, and materials science. These are vital topics in civil engineering as well and especially in building houses/bridges. We study and analyze the forces and stresses that may be on certain structures, which are invisible entities. We don't see forces, we don't see gravity, but we have made a system that works. It has worked time and time again. You living in a safe home is the result of this. Everything around you that has been synthetically produced was the result of science. Even medicine.

  • @sascha...
    @sascha... Рік тому +9

    Good to see Aaron Raw was allowed in 😆 and didn't burst into flames .

    • @abbynormal9836
      @abbynormal9836 Рік тому +1

      You should listen to Aron. He debunks all this young earth trash.

    • @michaelsears6702
      @michaelsears6702 9 місяців тому

      No he doesn’t, he would like to think he does but he doesn’t. To me he just confirms God is real

    • @sascha...
      @sascha... 9 місяців тому

      @michaelsears6702 your standard for what is true to you is a very low bar . Age and knowledge could fix that.

    • @michaelsears6702
      @michaelsears6702 8 місяців тому

      @@sascha... I'm 25 and I read both from evolutionist and creationist. I side with creationist. If you open up your heart you will know there is God. To me, your standard for truth is set at the lowest bar.