Economic Update: The Political Economy Of Tariffs

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 чер 2024
  • [EU S14 E23] The Political Economy Of Tariffs
    In this week’s Economic Update, Professor Richard Wolff devotes the entire program to an analysis of tariffs. We discuss why tariffs are not a worker's issue, why capitalism's continuous swings between free trade and protectionist periods and phases make little impact on workers, and why competing capitalists seek to get workers to support their positions on tariffs.
    If you haven't already, please subscribe to our channel, follow us on social media and of course be sure to sign up on our website:
    www.democracyatwork.info
    As always, we thank you for your attention, support, and solidarity.
    The d@w Team
    Economic Update with Richard D. Wolff is a DemocracyatWork.info Inc. production. We make it a point to provide the show free of ads and rely on viewer support to continue doing so. You can support our work by joining our Patreon community:
    / democracyatwork
    Or you can go to our website:
    www.democracyatwork.info/donate
    Every donation counts and helps us provide a larger audience with the information they need to better understand the events around the world they can't get anywhere else.
    We want to thank our devoted community of supporters who help make this show and the others we produce possible each week. We kindly ask you to also support the work we do by encouraging others to subscribe to our UA-cam channel and website: www.democracyatwork.info

КОМЕНТАРІ • 333

  • @leekianseng359
    @leekianseng359 8 днів тому +50

    Excellent. Professor Wolff explained the topic of tariffs very well. The American consumers are the true suckers, having to pay more unnecessarily. Sad the government is doing a disservice to their own people. 🙄☹

    • @kgapholasegadimanebethuel3873
      @kgapholasegadimanebethuel3873 8 днів тому +3

      In actual fact Americans are forced to purchase from one producer no matter the price...

    • @arthurlincoln9093
      @arthurlincoln9093 3 дні тому

      If you are an American desperate for a Chinese EV then go ahead and buy one. But do not think you have the right to wreck the American auto industry by purchasing a foreign made product that is sold below cost because the Chinese government hands out money to Chinese manufacturers to operate at a loss in their own country.
      The argument that American consumers are hard done by is false but the economic environment and ecology of the US has to be protected by government or Americans will lose their jobs.
      And incidentally Tesla also received tariffs.

    • @arthurlincoln9093
      @arthurlincoln9093 3 дні тому

      If you are American, desperate for a Chinese made EV, then buy one and pay a similar price for it as an American one would cost.
      The question Americans need to ask themselves is if they want Chinese made products that are heavily subsidised flooding into the US and putting US companies out of business because US companies do not receive government help in general. US businesses have to borrow to invest and employ workers. In China the average salary is around $3 an hour and the Chinese do not have homes. They live in boxes with no labor rights and no job security.

    • @clarestucki5151
      @clarestucki5151 2 дні тому

      @@kgapholasegadimanebethuel3873 That's true only when there is only only producer, and that is very rare.

    • @clarestucki5151
      @clarestucki5151 2 дні тому

      @@arthurlincoln9093 U. S companies that cannot compete with foreign companies should go out of business, because that makes both countries better off by keeping costs low for everybody..

  • @CrazieTrayzie
    @CrazieTrayzie 8 днів тому +45

    Protect this man

  • @sangm1561
    @sangm1561 9 днів тому +63

    Tariffs also lead to trade wars. With US placing 100% tariffs on electric vehicles from China, it stands to reason that China will come up with their own tariffs as punishment like buying more agriculture products from Brazil, etc.

    • @clarestucki5151
      @clarestucki5151 9 днів тому +25

      When Trump started his "easy to win" trade war with China, China stopped buying U,S. agricultural products (most notably soybeans and corn), and U.S. farmers took a major hit.

    • @user-hx2wx7mk8n
      @user-hx2wx7mk8n 9 днів тому

      We've been in a trade war with Communist China since we allowed them to join the WTO in 2001....we've been losing badly.

    • @ohioboy4801
      @ohioboy4801 8 днів тому +14

      I think Boeing also hurts as China moves towards AirBus

    • @martinvera4720
      @martinvera4720 7 днів тому +1

      @@clarestucki5151 Check the groceries during Trump vs Biden…

    • @_Wai_Wai_
      @_Wai_Wai_ 7 днів тому +1

      @@ohioboy4801 China's COMAC will be servicing the China market, replacing both Boeing and Airbus in China.

  • @kianleyon6613
    @kianleyon6613 8 днів тому +35

    Thank you Dr, Wolff you are an amazing human being. I learn so much everytime I watch your show.

    • @MatewanMassacre
      @MatewanMassacre 8 днів тому +4

      He's 'opened the door,' so to say, for SO many people ... myself included, if we can go back 10 years.
      I remember when D@W had fewer than 15,000 subs.
      I have critiques of Dr. Wolff's work, as has come from further development and education; but I realize that his work, and his analysis, fulfills a function which does exactly what I first suggested. It opens a door, which would otherwise, remain shut.

  • @tedpop
    @tedpop 8 днів тому +20

    DR Wolff, the distaste in simply the movements of your mouth is palpable, and I love it.

  • @5hipCaptain
    @5hipCaptain 8 днів тому +21

    Hi, just wanted to say how much we appreciate you. Keep up the good work.

  • @ClaribelRamirz
    @ClaribelRamirz 9 днів тому +33

    Thank you for the discussion.

  • @NoCensorship
    @NoCensorship 9 днів тому +30

    Love 🎉 this show!! Great info!!

  • @MatewanMassacre
    @MatewanMassacre 8 днів тому +9

    That's what a lot of our people don't understand - that the capitalist ruling class is not monolithic, there are sharp divisions amongst them.
    We see this reflected in mainstream bourgeois politics. The Democratic Party represents one faction of Capital; and the Republican Party works for another faction.
    In the case of the Democrats, it's the long-noted 'Eastern Establishment,' the Old Money, Finance and Investment Capital, the famous "60 families" of the Northeast. The infamous 'Robber Baron' families of the 19th and early 20th centuries. In essence, the Democrats represent Monopoly Capital.
    Meanwhile, the Republicans work on behalf of New Money, which sprang up in the Southern and Western parts of the country, in the wake of WW2. They're largely indebted to the aerospace industry, the defense contractors (who spread their blessings evenly), agribusiness, land speculators, real estate, box store chains, and gambling casinos. The GOP is the party of what was called 'The Sun Belt' back in the 1970's and 1980's, where the new Southern Rim establishment has taken root. They aren't as wealthy, or as seemingly investment saavy, as the Old Money cartels; and many of them are individual capitalists whose portfolios aren't as diversified as someone whose last name might be Morgan, Chase, Rockefeller, Ford, or DuPont.
    So, these parties sometimes have major disagreements, but most of what they fight over has little to do with the common interests of the American People.
    One group wants to maintain and expand its monopolies, and the other sect wants more and more accomodation, from the government and the people, so that it can expand its wealth and influence, some day to join the monopolists, at the top. Of course, there is crossover, and cross-filtration, amongst these factions of Capital, which is why the entire political establishment is often referred to as, 'the uniparty.'

    • @sdrc92126
      @sdrc92126 8 днів тому

      The "father of our capitalist ruling class" was a socialist. How does that work?

  • @suichingyuen2100
    @suichingyuen2100 8 днів тому +4

    Another consequence of the tariff is that the US manufacturers do not need to improve so products are inferior and the production process is inefficient.

  • @mohammadmossayebi2609
    @mohammadmossayebi2609 9 днів тому +17

    Good information as usual professor

  • @user-hf6qo7kq6j
    @user-hf6qo7kq6j 8 днів тому +4

    Dr Rich all the love from greece we need your courage

  • @armeniobraz
    @armeniobraz 7 днів тому +3

    I am doubting there is such a thing as a honest politician!

  • @idofdm7625
    @idofdm7625 8 днів тому +5

    I'm American by citizenship, I will simplify to one word "superiority complex", I must admit for the longest time they were superior, they used that superiority on good also bad purpose in the name of national interst meaning we win you lose selfish interest!
    Many countries see through the bad side now and seek alternative to so-called US leadership in the world! My government will keep pursuing same policy until our society devolved in to a state of despair, we are on our way, then people will rise up and call for changes, not happening any time soon, may be 10-20 years from now! By then I may be living outside of US😢😢😢

    • @urimtefiki226
      @urimtefiki226 4 дні тому

      Not only that you have no respect for wisdom, you thing everyone is slave and the money everything, this way of thinking will destroy you.

  • @kcwongytube
    @kcwongytube 5 днів тому

    Dr. Wolff, you are telling us the truth not like most politicians telling lies.

  • @Steve-rz7hm
    @Steve-rz7hm 4 дні тому +1

    The world needs more people like Professor Wolfe

  • @godfatherofcinema
    @godfatherofcinema 8 днів тому +4

    Great show Mr. Wolff but they have a EV in China that is better than a Tesla for $10,000 that we are not going to have access to because of the tariffs thank you very much for the breakdown

  • @yu-jd5jg
    @yu-jd5jg 8 днів тому +4

    Wolff in this episode did not say the US tariffs on affordable imported goods are the main cause of inflation especially for low-income already suffering ordinary Americans or the so-called 99%

    • @lawsonj39
      @lawsonj39 7 днів тому

      It makes sense that tariffs increase inflation, but to say they're the main cause of inflation is a pretty bold claim, especially when you consider that corporations set prices at the maximum level they can get away with. You'd really have to provide a lot of evidence to support your position.

  • @norbertcardoso8469
    @norbertcardoso8469 7 днів тому +1

    BRILLIANT EXPLANATION OF THE BENEFITS AND HAZARDS OF TARIFFS. I WISH EVERYONE COULD HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THIS WORD, TARIFFS.

  • @kobked-x
    @kobked-x 8 днів тому +4

    Professor, you should hook up with Scott Ritter, Colonel Douglas McGregor, Judge Napolitano, Gerald Celente - Trends Journal and this YT show, Daniel Davis -Deep Dive. They have a great Project, Waging Peace in a nut shell. I highly recommend them as allies for the cause of changing the world from a war based hell pit back to a real life normal.

  • @spanky7277
    @spanky7277 9 днів тому +9

    Free trade was started from the Daddy bush error .

  • @avtarsingh8948
    @avtarsingh8948 8 днів тому +5

    As always, brilliant. Thank you.

  • @ewalker1057
    @ewalker1057 9 днів тому +14

    Please have a discussion on the current status of the US housing market and its overpriced homes. Will it lead to another 2007/2008 housing bubble collapse? Are the prices starting to fall? Is there an increase in the number of vacant houses and apartments?

  • @taffyandbeanz
    @taffyandbeanz 9 днів тому +6

    Tariffs also make industries less competitive in the world market

    • @MMLL369
      @MMLL369 8 днів тому +1

      The US auto industry is the classic example; I really don't see American brand autos anywhere else other than the US.

    • @momokui
      @momokui 7 днів тому

      @@MMLL369 You do see them in the movies and games

  • @juliaweber7941
    @juliaweber7941 7 днів тому +3

    Amazing lecture as always professor 😊

  • @stevehuang37
    @stevehuang37 9 днів тому +6

    Thank you for your info about Tariffs

  • @ClaribelRamirz
    @ClaribelRamirz 9 днів тому +18

    Yes Sir. Thanks.

  • @charlestubalike1035
    @charlestubalike1035 7 днів тому +2

    Thanks professor

  • @TingTong-mh6ns
    @TingTong-mh6ns 7 днів тому +2

    As always, great video, Prof. I benefitted immensely. 👍🏽👍🏻👍

  • @mariabaker2894
    @mariabaker2894 8 днів тому +3

    Great teacher you are! 🙏👍

  • @ABi-wm9oc
    @ABi-wm9oc 9 днів тому +4

    Love you
    Dear Dr wolf ❤

  • @selvanegra65
    @selvanegra65 7 днів тому +1

    Take care Dr. Wolff

  • @barnabusdoyle4930
    @barnabusdoyle4930 9 днів тому +4

    American manufactures need stiff competition to keep their vehicles up to par. We need to let China sell their EVs here in the US without the tariffs and force our automakers to drop the price of their cars to compete.

    • @randoomain7485
      @randoomain7485 8 днів тому +1

      The fact that US manufacturers need a 100% tariff means they've pretty thoroughly lost, they can't even pretend to compete. Without this tariff US production of EVs (and probably other cars) would just collapse.

  • @darbofuchs9021
    @darbofuchs9021 7 днів тому +1

    Thank you very much Professor Wolff. You explained it so well that everybody can understand it.

  • @lingth
    @lingth 8 днів тому +5

    It's not like the American consumer can do something about it, Biden or Trump either one will slap tariffs anyway.
    By denying cheaper Chinese made products, this time it's EV, and then DJI drones etc .. industry who use them have to buy American made ones at a higher price, and raise their operating costs and pass the cost on to consumers..

  • @joshanderson7358
    @joshanderson7358 16 годин тому

    Well done Prof Wolf. Good analysis. 👏🌹💯🇺🇸

  • @victorprice7431
    @victorprice7431 6 днів тому +1

    Thank you, professor!

  • @unclerico6558
    @unclerico6558 4 дні тому

    beautiful video mr. Wolff, very simple to understand for the layman. more like these please.

  • @jamysmith7891
    @jamysmith7891 8 днів тому +1

    Tariffs on strategic commodities seem like a perfect tool for national industrial security, particularly if strategic interests are publicly owned
    Tariffs on commercial products seem like mafia protection

  • @willeisinga2089
    @willeisinga2089 9 днів тому +2

    Price is Politics. Not real Prices. In China EV Cost 10.000. in EU 30.000 . 20.000 Tariffs and Taxes.

  • @clarestucki5151
    @clarestucki5151 9 днів тому +14

    Congratulations to Wolff, he actually got this on exactly right, and his analysis was spot on.
    The truth is that tariff taxes protect the inefficient at the expense of everybody else. The financial losses of the majority ALWAYS far exceed the financial gains of the protected minority. Free trade benefits all nations always.

  • @nitsujnaej
    @nitsujnaej 9 днів тому +5

    John Deere in China, should be worried about what the US State has done.

    • @user-hx2wx7mk8n
      @user-hx2wx7mk8n 9 днів тому

      Today's John Deere is an evil company with their 'No-right-to repair' policy.

  • @IndepIndepWALT
    @IndepIndepWALT 8 днів тому +2

    4:00 you also got to include shipping cost as well, most $10 dollar wines are 750ML bottles witch weigh about 2.5 pounds, USPS charges $22.90 for (not over) 3lbs so it'd be 10 plus 2, plus 22.90 so $34.90 for the shop owner to buy that wine, now realistically he would buy in bulk like a pack of 12 would be $100 to make the math easier, and the shop owner saves 20 bucks, but that 20% tariff would effectively make him pay full price, so $120, 2.5LBS times 12 bottles is 30 lbs not over 30 is $107.7 5USPS (UPS is 35.55 EUROS $38.11as of this comment) so for sake of saving money like any capitalist would he would use UPS so $120+38.11 is $158.11 dived by 12 because that's how many bottles he has to sell so it's 13.175833333 or $13.18 witch by nature of the math 13.18*12 is $158.16 but I imagine he'd want more than a 5 cent profit, sell the all at $14*12 is $168, so a 9.89 dollar profit so selling them for 15 like you suggest 4:30 he would get $180-$158.11 is $21.89 in profit selling them for $20 each would get him $240-$158.11 would get him $81.89 in profit,
    (sarcasms coming up) witch we all know he will evenly distribute to the hard working employees that deal with costumers that want to get drunk all day, say the store is open from 10 to 10 closed on Sunday openers come in at 8, and closers leave at 12, so 2 8 hours shifts a day, 16h*6d 96 hours that need to be filled with at least two employees each shit, maybe 2 full timers and 2 part times each day, 1 manager and the owner, really small liquor store here 96/40 is 2.4, so if you had 4 full timers 2 that took turns opening and 2 closing that's over time, unless you mange 4 part timers that could fill out break times for the full timers to avoid needing to pay over time, but the point is that's 8 employees, now in real life no small store has that many, but I'm talking a magical healthy store that really values it's employees 8+1 manager +the owner so 10 employees so each worker totally makes 8.189 or $8.19 from that case being sold. oh wait we live under capitalism not socialism my bad, it's almost like the workers keeping their share of generated profit might be a good idea

    • @Mk-oy9ns
      @Mk-oy9ns 8 днів тому +1

      Most trucks carry over 20 tonnes of goods for as little as $1.50 per mile.
      Ups are robbing you!

  • @josephdelgiorgio3997
    @josephdelgiorgio3997 9 днів тому +5

    Thank u

  • @ewalker1057
    @ewalker1057 9 днів тому +4

    Now less wine will be sold in America. Less demand for the over taxed wine. creates shortages thus higher inflation. US goods are three to four times higher in prices than the same goods imported from China. Fewer purchases, production jobs disappear.

  • @frankfower9769
    @frankfower9769 8 днів тому +2

    And the American People Pay for the Tariffs: it’s the Consumer Price going up and we the people Have to pay more to get less:
    The foreign producers Don’t pay the tariffs: people here pay the tariffs
    It’s that simple

  • @inokehemaloto9832
    @inokehemaloto9832 5 днів тому

    Miss you Dr Wolff

  • @JIMuser-vh3Zxx
    @JIMuser-vh3Zxx 19 годин тому

    Excellent excellent presentation

  • @RaphaelGbissa
    @RaphaelGbissa 8 днів тому +1

    Thanks for your enlightenment.

  • @alexhidel3732
    @alexhidel3732 9 днів тому +1

    Thank you for informing us of valuable information

  • @detectiveofmoneypolitics
    @detectiveofmoneypolitics 8 днів тому +1

    Economic investigator Frank G Melbourne Australia is following this very informative content cheers Frank

  • @seangao6546
    @seangao6546 8 днів тому +1

    Tariff protection a small group of business and hurt the consumers. The business will never eat that tariff, it will pass directly to customers.

  • @rosemaryspiota9836
    @rosemaryspiota9836 7 днів тому +1

    Clear and interesting.

  • @hamzahbawkher6012
    @hamzahbawkher6012 8 днів тому

    Beautifully explained, as usual

  • @theageofgoddess
    @theageofgoddess 9 днів тому +1

    Thank you Prof 🙏🏽

  • @nasreenakhtar8521
    @nasreenakhtar8521 8 днів тому +1

    Love it when he says "uncle Sam" 😂

  • @user-mm2fo8my2f
    @user-mm2fo8my2f 8 днів тому +3

    循循善誘,諄諄教誨;令人尊敬的學者 !!

  • @RogerChong-zy2ux
    @RogerChong-zy2ux 8 днів тому +1

    Thanks!

  • @richardwilliams1986
    @richardwilliams1986 8 днів тому +1

    We don't make much anything exported, so competition is not affected, only domestic inflation increases.

  • @charlesprasad9836
    @charlesprasad9836 9 днів тому +10

    Wonderful news

  • @thusegomoamogwe3009
    @thusegomoamogwe3009 8 днів тому +1

    thankx

  • @tashiyann3262
    @tashiyann3262 8 днів тому +1

    thank you, economy professor.😀😀😀 looks like the dominance of others mixes into the economy and hurts our own people.

  • @Ju_pi_ter
    @Ju_pi_ter 8 днів тому

    thank you very much

  • @Evilhunknextdoor
    @Evilhunknextdoor 6 днів тому

    Spot on

  • @elcmu2637
    @elcmu2637 8 днів тому +3

    China couldn't compete with ICE so they focused in NEV and it's not as if they kept it a secret. They have products that benefit the world that create less noise and air pollution and can easily be adopted through competitive pricing. Instead of tariffing maybe we should ask what will be the technology that supersedes EVs.

    • @hypocritehater1673
      @hypocritehater1673 7 днів тому

      Smart Chinese,no wonder their I Q ranks 5,American ranks 29😂

  • @symong8323
    @symong8323 7 днів тому

    Tariffs and retaliation by targeted country also mean sustained period of inflation and establishment of multiple supply chains to bypass tariffs (which is also inflationary). Inflation is an ally of the FED and raison d’être for higher rates (meaning a strong USD, which US Capitalists use to acquire overseas assets, businesses etc, which again will destroy American jobs). Not surprisingly, most American blue collar workers have seen their quality of life being eroded over the past 20 years vis-a-vis Chinese peers who have quadrupled their wealth in the same period. Richard is correct to attribute the blame for American blue collar stagnation on the capitalists. 👍

  • @albertcadgame8314
    @albertcadgame8314 8 днів тому +4

    one question prof.
    Why is it that an engineer required a degree, master or PHD to apply for an engineer job. Whereas the HIGHEST POST in the country is the president post which do need any proper education to apply for it. Tom, Dick and Harry can apply for that post ? Why is that ?
    A good example is the Ukraine president whose job was a comedian and now he is the president of Ukraine !!!

    • @peterpph126
      @peterpph126 7 днів тому

      That’s why the democratic west is declining & a good example is an economic adviser of one of an ex-POTUS couldn’t explain why US government has to borrow money when they can simply print more money.

    • @cainiaowu
      @cainiaowu 6 днів тому

      That is why China is wining, they have engineers as political leaders.

  • @Ace1000ks19751982
    @Ace1000ks19751982 9 днів тому +7

    The demand for EVs has been going down in the US, because they are too expensive. Auto manufacturers are building expensive SUVs, trucks, and EVs. At the same time, they stopped producing inexpensive IC sedans, because those are less profitable to produce.
    As a result, the average person cannot afford to buy inexpensive vehicles. That is what you call monopoly.

    • @fairryalp.-de5qb
      @fairryalp.-de5qb 9 днів тому +2

      China has EV manufacturers in many countries, and even in Mexico. But China rather selling the cheap China EV to help Latin America grows than trying to bring EV to US market.
      Or none of China EVs made for US. IOW, American can drive to Mexico to buy cheap China BYD EV to bring back to US. But they can't drive in US, because they are not made for US.

    • @Ace1000ks19751982
      @Ace1000ks19751982 8 днів тому +1

      @@fairryalp.-de5qb BYD's plant in Mexico got cancelled. Never the less, BYD has a car plant in Brazil.

  • @slv877
    @slv877 6 днів тому

    Great content!

  • @peaceleader7315
    @peaceleader7315 9 днів тому +32

    Tariff protects the wealthy .

    • @clarestucki5151
      @clarestucki5151 9 днів тому

      Big lie. Tariff taxes protect the inefficient, not the wealthy!

    • @user-hx2wx7mk8n
      @user-hx2wx7mk8n 9 днів тому

      Tariffs protect middle class Americans from Chinese slave wages. Why do you think the globalist/zillionaire class hates them so much?

    • @Googlag
      @Googlag 8 днів тому

      No, tariffs are a tool for raising prices and protecting the rights of stealing from the population under a plausible pretext.

  • @johnleeji
    @johnleeji 7 днів тому

    Thank you for your comments. I agree with you. May I suggest that protectionism thru tariffs results in protected industry not working on efficiency and innovation in order to reduce cost.

  • @harryzhang3111
    @harryzhang3111 6 днів тому

    In summary, All industries and general consumers are hurt badly to protect a small group of workers' job who has not been doing their job efficiently. Therefore, tariff works only for those expensive consumable items such as wine but not on tools, transport equipment, communication equipment and etc.

    • @tenmanX
      @tenmanX 6 днів тому

      Knock, knock... Anybody home inside that head?🙃

  • @user-js9dq4we4j
    @user-js9dq4we4j 6 днів тому

    I got into trouble over Trump's tariffs on goods from China where many US corporations went in order to lower costs of production. However, when my clothes dryer died I was in a bind. The cost of a new one was $1000 although produced by an American company--in China. I paid a big tariff of about $300.

  • @mikerizzyraw
    @mikerizzyraw 8 днів тому

    Austerity measures refer to policies implemented by governments aimed at reducing public sector debt by limiting public spending, increasing taxes, or a combination of both. These measures are typically adopted in response to a fiscal crisis or high levels of national debt and are intended to restore fiscal discipline and stabilize the economy. Common components of austerity measures include:
    1. **Cuts in Public Spending:** Reducing expenditure on public services, social welfare programs, public sector wages, and infrastructure projects.
    2. **Tax Increases:** Raising taxes on individuals and businesses to increase government revenue.
    3. **Structural Reforms:** Implementing changes to improve efficiency and reduce costs in the public sector, such as pension reforms, labor market deregulation, and privatization of state-owned enterprises.
    Austerity measures are often controversial because, while they aim to reduce debt and restore economic stability, they can also lead to short-term economic contraction, higher unemployment, and social unrest due to the reduction in government services and support.

    • @mikerizzyraw
      @mikerizzyraw 8 днів тому

      Biden is textbook… too bad the playing field is multi polar.

  • @Dan-DJCc
    @Dan-DJCc 9 днів тому +4

    Thanks. I have a question. Do the United States war colleges and military academies offer coursework in accounting, and if not, shouldn't they ought to teach accounting skills for the future brass to handle trillion dollar budgets?

    • @bluewater454
      @bluewater454 9 днів тому +7

      Why stop at the military brass? That ought to be a requirement for every member of Congress.

    • @AlanDavidDoane
      @AlanDavidDoane 9 днів тому +5

      There won't be trillion-dollar budgets much longer, I wouldn't worry about it.

    • @woody1452
      @woody1452 6 днів тому

      Why would they need to know accounting and budgeting when the money for wars is always limitless.

  • @kgapholasegadimanebethuel3873
    @kgapholasegadimanebethuel3873 8 днів тому

    You have simplified it...

  • @geraldmantel4955
    @geraldmantel4955 9 днів тому +9

    They oughta put a tariff on war.

  • @headsails
    @headsails 8 днів тому +1

    The tariff conundrum is one that shows how capitalism is damned if it does and damned if it doesn't. Contradictory endpoints are the reasons why capitalism is struggling to remain relevant and legitimate.

  • @mikerizzyraw
    @mikerizzyraw 8 днів тому +1

    One of Tesla’s biggest factory is definitely in Shanghai China

  • @julieweiner1623
    @julieweiner1623 7 днів тому +1

    Chinese cars and trucks here in Dominican Republic. Buses too

  • @leecheong4986
    @leecheong4986 7 днів тому

    Fisker, an EV start up in USA just applied for bankruptcy. So much for tariff protecting jobs.

  • @michaelcook488
    @michaelcook488 8 днів тому +8

    I really wish the Chinese electric car cost $30k to make, it retails landed for around $10K! It is better made with better technology than the American counterpart, that cost in some cases over $100K. We are either highly inefficient or extremely GREEDY! Either way the United Stated needs to adapt or die. As always, Dr. Wolff is amazing.

    • @anaveragehuman2937
      @anaveragehuman2937 6 днів тому

      “better made” false

    • @urimtefiki226
      @urimtefiki226 4 дні тому

      you are extremely greedy, insuluting the inventor of the algorithm bullshiter only a bullshiter can do it, or to go to the religion as you wrote me 'Read Kuran' after stealing my invention, now I tell you read your regligious book and insult you as well. There is no other language the bullshiter understands, he is psychopath.

  • @krishnannarayanan5252
    @krishnannarayanan5252 7 днів тому

    SIR, please explain inflation, deflation etc and its advantage/ disadvantage in your lucid way

  • @redbeard6669
    @redbeard6669 7 днів тому

    Mr. Wolfe, do you believe the tariffs were possibly imposed to slow the transition to EV's because it would severely reduce the amount of fuel sold in America, which would cause a decline in the worth of our dollar since it's backed by petrol? Especially since now Saudi Arabia did not renew the deal to trade oil only for American dollars.

  • @williamblack4097
    @williamblack4097 8 днів тому

    Thank you , for this great explanation and analysis about how tariffs works. It certainly refreshing from the demagogic rhetoric we've been hearing from capitalist politicians like Biden and Trump.

  • @badbrains4168
    @badbrains4168 3 дні тому

    good.

  • @HasnaaAlaa
    @HasnaaAlaa 8 днів тому +2

    The right thing to do would've been to do what mexico did, instead of tariffs, the US gov should invite chinese companies to build factories in the US and hire US workers

    • @peterpph126
      @peterpph126 7 днів тому

      One US politician had recently advocated for that but he also added that the US can then steal Chinese EV manufacturers’ Intellectual Properties 😂.

  • @spanky7277
    @spanky7277 9 днів тому +2

    Sorry Professor Wolff for missing the live show I was looking forward to being part of the Live show .

  • @AnnieT369
    @AnnieT369 8 днів тому

    If the product is lousy workers won't get protected.
    The customer always loses from having to pay more.

  • @jacintochua6885
    @jacintochua6885 9 днів тому +7

    Tariffs pritect only certain industr8es. The rest of the country suffers from the higher prices. People understand this?

    • @weiliao9416
      @weiliao9416 8 днів тому +1

      Well said! but Biden's hope is that most American voter will realize your first sentence, but not the second.

  • @TurielD
    @TurielD 8 днів тому +4

    The American car manufacturer *is* equally or even more efficient, but they are required to let their workers keep more of the surplus.
    Free trade just forces wage competition in a race to the bottom.

  • @allahdinosamo7654
    @allahdinosamo7654 8 днів тому +1

    In the end the company , product or country that's less competitive will lose . .

  • @helengarrett6378
    @helengarrett6378 9 днів тому +3

    Trump is nuts. Tarriffs instead of income taxes? We might wish to keep all the income we earn, but we just cannot provide all the protections and services the government must provide without some source of revenue coming in.
    Trump has floated the idea to replace one tax, income tax, with a tarriff on imported goods. But tarriffs are regressive taxes. That means it's harder for lower and middle wage workers to pay the increased prices for imported goods. Think about it.
    Almost all electronics are produced outside the United States. Most car parts for American cars are produced abroad too. Produce and meat are imported too. Everything is globalized now and prices are gonna go up for everything. Need furniture? Most of the less expensive furniture sold in America is now made in China..Ikea goods comes from abroad too!
    Meanwhile, the wealthy will save an enormous amount on corporate and personal income taxes. That's what a regressive tax means.
    You won't be keeping more money but you would be told you were saving all of those income taxes. It's propaganda for the gullible.

  • @user-cd2ut4fx1m
    @user-cd2ut4fx1m 5 днів тому +1

    Prof Woolf NEVER fails to amaze with fantastic, descriptive analysis on tariffs! 🩵🩵🩵

  • @markkelley453
    @markkelley453 6 днів тому

    If the primary rationale for tariffs is, in fact, to protect jobs, then none other than Tesla itself has emphatically put the lie to that notion. That’s right, one of the very companies (if not THE company) that should directly benefit from “protective” tariffs have been shedding jobs left and right (no pun intended). First they said it would be 6,300 jobs in California, Austin and Buffalo. Then in April that number increased to 14,000, or fully 10% of its workforce. Finally, another 600 in California announced in May. So much for protecting American jobs!!
    Looking at the other comments, apparently nobody else noticed, which doesn’t surprise me. Then again Dr. Wolff didn’t mention it either, and therefore missed a chance to significantly bolsters his argument…..

  • @LukeGabriel-nr6mg
    @LukeGabriel-nr6mg 4 дні тому

    ❤️❤️❤️

  • @eddtwohig6663
    @eddtwohig6663 6 днів тому

    I can not believe that Dr. Wolff would not tell the full story. TARIFFS ARE NOT PAID BY CONSUMERS. If tax is not collected on imports, consumers pay the money spent by the government somewhere else. WHERE BETTER TO PAY TAX, ON IMPORTS OR ON WAGES ?? TAX ON WAGES ADDS TO THE COSTS OF PRODUCTION. SINCE WE STOPPED CHARGING TARIFFS OUR COUNTRIES" ECONOMIES HAVE SUFFERED. In Canada especially our manufacturing sector has almost disappeared. What we need, our countries can produce. What we have surplus we can export to those countries that need it, irrespective of tariffs. Tariffs must be placed on all imports.

  • @TheSunsetdonkey
    @TheSunsetdonkey 6 днів тому

    Why can't we have import tax only?

  • @peterpph126
    @peterpph126 7 днів тому +1

    Tariffs are hidden tax on consumers & for those states that have value added tax, the government gets additional revenue on those taxes on top of the hidden taxes. And that additional tax is on after-taxed dollars 🤪

  • @shainfarah3433
    @shainfarah3433 7 днів тому

    we need adicuit public transportation, let us get out of privately owned means of transportation.