Mavrik VS. Rogue // Callaway Drivers
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 гру 2024
- Testing the performance of the Callaway Rogue driver against the new Mavrik in identical specs.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL: www.youtube.co...
Follow us on Instagram: / theofficialtxg
JOIN THE TXG TEAM: / @clubchampionmedia
txg.ca
Filmed at: Tour Experience Golf
Custom Golf Club Fitting Studio - Toronto, Canada
I was one of those guys who wer were begging for a comparison with the rogue and you guys delivered in Spades. I am really happy that I won't be reinvesting in a new driver anytime soon
The best golf content in the industry!
FINALLY someone comparing the new Mavrik with it’s actual predecessor and not the Flash! It’s a simple thing, but that’s the detail you guys consider when doing your work!
"we need to test with a robot" . . . what you meant to say was "we need to test with a DIFFERENT robot"
They need the "BloisBot 2.0" only strikes low heel.🤓
Steve Dietrich yeah as much as I love watching these club test videos, watching matt hit that same push/draw every time does nothing for my self confidence.
Or "we need to test with a robot"... "Dude, I'm standing right here!?" - Matt Probably. Nice swings Matt.
Why isn't Matt on tour again?
We need a slow motion of Matt's swing, its crazy where he stops his back swing but still creates that much speed.
Yes Matty's back swing sure is shorter...but, it seems like his lower body unwinds earlier than before so there is a time when his club is going backwards and his hips have started to open, maximising his X factor and stretch. Great for a youngster, not so achievable for those of us with a few more miles on the clock.
As for short backswing, it seems to me to often fit with a quick tempo player. Some it suits, some it doesn't..
Don't confuse where the shaft is to his turn. He has zero wrist cock and that is why his shaft is up in the air with a full turn.
Go to the settings and change the playback speed to 0.25
Let’s not forget Ian. He has a beautiful and powerful swing as well 🏌🏻
Thank you TXG for doing this type of club comparison. So much more relevant to compare clubs that are 2-3 years apart for us weekend golfers who dont buy new clubs that often. So cool that you guys are doing this.
Can't thank you guys enough....combined Rogue head off this review...with Fujikura Ventus Velo Core off other review....left shaft over length....daughter picked up 20 yards....12 degree launch...hitting it on the screws....1.44 efficiency 148 ball speed....fantastic!
Matt being pushed by Ian , putting the green out at 350 yards.. loving it .. what an interesting comparison, thanks guys . 😉🏌️⛳️🍻
This is gold guys, thank you. Can't WAIT to see the other manufacturers also
I recently upgraded from the big bertha fusion driver to the rogue and the difference is night and day. Far more consistent ball strikes on center with much better fairway accuracy. Probably around 10-15m further per drive as well. Have hit Mavrik has well and I couldn't tell the difference between Rogue and Mavrik from a player standpoint. For reference I'm a mid to high handicapper so take this with a grain of salt.
I should have added to my other post that this confirms my testing. I have the Rogue SZ as my gamer (and love it) and tested vs Mavrik SZ with same exact shaft and specs. Nearly identical. I still might pick up a Mavrik SZ at some point though, but now I don't feel the pressure to do it immediately. THANKS AGAIN!
TXG instant credibility with this review, and many other of their reviews and in this case, clearly demonstrates year to year, only so much the manufactures can do with the restrictions. If you have a Rogue Sub Zero, you're upgrading because you just "Want the new one". In all their other reviews you see very close numbers with all the new stuff, that's credible. Everything is darn good. Pick on you like the best, get fitted, and you'll be good!
I saw the Maverick before it was officially released, when the Callaway rep was at my local pro shop and when he asked my opinion, I said it looked like my Rougue sub zero.... Thanks for the confirmation and saving me some $$$!
I'm here... having never played a fitted driver with a shaft thats stiff enough and currently using a driver from the 2000's because that's all I have. Just got fit for irons and wedges, waiting for the new wood to be available for fitting. When you're only ever gonna be buying a driver every, at minimum, 4 or 5 years, it pays to just buy the newest one lol.
Thanks for this! I currently play a Rogue and it's nice to know how it compares
I love my Rogue/ Mitsubishi C6 driver set up courtesy of TXG and Chris Kendall. The ball flies high and straight. I’m not a long hitter but given my age, it’s the most effective club in my bag. The % of centre face strikes is incredible. If I drove the ball this well twenty years ago I’d have been a single digit player. I’m sure these newer drivers are superb but I never look at drivers these days. My irons are still a work in progress though.
Definitely want to see Matty hit the King LTD! Was such a unique driver for its time and didn't get a lot of press.
Cory Lancaster fully agree! The LTD was a monster.
Love it👍
I’d love to see the Original Callaway Epic GBB sub zero against the new Maverick. Both were “breakthrough” tech
Would love to see a txg style walk back through the last 10 years
Was pumped to see this video pop up today as I current play Rogue SZ. Great stuff as always!
I have used the rogue sub zero for the last two years and have enjoyed it. I tested all the new drivers and the in my case, the new mavrik was in improvement in dispersion and in my case, about 5 yards longer because I'm not super consistent in my impact location. It seemed to even things out for me.
Great reviews guys.
Great head to head and I can't wait for the other comparisons. Wonderful stuff.
Just did 1 hr Trackman session hitting my 2 drivers M3 and G400 LST. They perform for me very well and game either whenever. Last 20 mins on the session I was hitting Mavrik and all 3 finished within 1,5 mph ballspeed and 3 mtrs of carry/total spinning about 2600 (G400 best numbers by a narrow margin). All felt equally forgiving (M3 weights back), Mavrik with the stock Rogue shaft retained the ball speed incredibly well, but strikes were really good too. So many good drivers out there that it is positive problem what to play...
i have a 917 D3 and I'm just now thinking about making a change. Still don't feel like I NEED to but I totally agree that it's more likely that most of us change drivers every 2-3 generations at best.
Good test gents! The Mavrik and Rogue Subzero are too low spin for me, so it makes me happy the standard Mavrik is such a change in Callaway head design, the standard Epic Flash and Rogue just are big heads that spin a lot for me. Having three head options in the Mavrik is pretty great, but I understand it isnt an across the board improvement from the Rogue.
Thank you soo much guys, it's great to see this comparison. I play with a rogue set, I love them but sometimes you just need a video like this to reassure you amongst all the advertisement your clubs are still up there in quality. Thank you again
Nice that you guys partner up with golf avenue for old clubs!
Great comparison, seems to be another really important reason to test before you buy. Thx for sharing TXG, you folks absolutely pin-point the important "stuff" for us!
The little bit of time that I've had with my Mav Sub has produced very similar results to what you guys found. Epic Sub, Rogue Sub, Flash Sub, and Mav Sub are all low spinning fire breathers. What I have seen (and yes, it's impossible to quantify with the naked eye) is an unmistakably tighter ball flight and dispersion with the Mav Sub.
Love these comparisons, another great idea and vid from TXG!
If anything, this should make us all feel more confident in the fitting process. Ian fit me into the rogue fall ‘18 and since seeing 2 new lines come out I’ve been nervous that I left something on the table. This gives me all the confidence in the world. My takeaway is get fit and trust in that club. It’ll do you well for 5 years.
Great comparison video. I game the Rogue Sub Zero and thought about upgrading but with minimal performance difference and high depreciation of the club think I’ll hang onto it for a little longer.
Great job guys! Love your channel and that you have done more edit and cut out scenes to shorten it. I have a ROGUE SZ (that I love) and was looking at MAVRIK, but thx to you I will just be updating my 3 wood only.. Thx again
Love the buggy time anywhere and in any format. GOOD JOB GENTS!!
Fantastic comparison idea!...can't wait to see the Cobra
Iv got a rogue and won’t be changing!! If it takes a robot to see a difference,then there is NO difference!!
Great content look forward to more of these tests.
Thank you for this, guys. As a Rogue SZ user (love it) it's good to see that quality of impact can still give equal result to upgrade of technology.
I still game the Rogue Sub. Probably the one of the longest tenured drivers I’ve ever owned
What is difference between rogue and rogue sub? I usually like to play drivers for awhile myself
@@kevinmac2298 Rogue Sub-Zero has the weight towards the front. Leads to lower ball flight and less spin (more unforgiving too). The Rogue has the weight to the back, making it launch higher. Much more forgiving
I have a tour issue rogue SZ that was not beat by rogue or epic flash SZ. I had all 3 heads and the same shaft testing on gc quad and couldn't find any way to make the other drivers win, and I was trying to upgrade. The fitter told me not to unless I wanted new and shiny...next/last shot will be mizuno 200....
I've got a rogue sub zero... It's the best driver I've had since the SLDR and is for me one of the best drivers of the last 10 years for both distance and forgivness (lucky enough to hit/test a lot)
Just discovered your content. I love your comparisons! Keep this content up! You’re one of online’s best duo’s!!
I play the standard Rogue and although I've not hit the Mavrik I wouldn't expect a difference that someone with my inconsistent swing would be able to notice. I can't see me replacing my driver for another 3 or 4 years minimum. I'm trying to 'improve' my swing with my driver (and I'm happy with progress so far) so I'll probably go into to test the fit later in the year.
Next let’s see comparison between SIM and M2 2016/M1 2016...I still hear that the M2 2016 is still the best of Taylormade drivers...Awesome vid guys...
Cannot wait for the rest of this series, especially king ltd.
Thanks for the review, you can see that the influence of the ‘super duper computer/flash face’ is zero
Love your comparisons tests. Always learning new things when I watch your videos.
Awesome video! I was thinking about trading my rouge in for the sim but may just hang on to the rouge for a year or two.
Love the Foresight sports profile name! The Dirty Dog! Also I am partial and really want to see M4 vs SIM!
I love my Callaway Rogue driver. I presently have it attached to a Tensei Ck PRO Orange 60s. I am wanting to try the Accra RPG in a similar spec, I’ve heard good things from the channel. Both of the shafts are counterbalanced which allows me to put some weight into the Rogue head which I like. I think I’m rolling with a 14g weight in the head. Would love a comparison video. CHEERS
This time last year you tested a Tour Edge driver and said you were about to test other clubs from TEE. Wasnt the quality good enough or was it more of a other things coming in your way??
More on their way in now, will be testing the new EXS220
Have the Rogue, tried both Epic Flash and Mavrick , am staying with Rogue it’s same same for me and it comfortable.
Also LTD vs F8/+ vs F9 vs SZ!
Best robot test out there. Great vid.
Can we have a look at m4 v m6 v SIM max & m3 v m5 v SIM
Upgraded my M5 For the standard SIM. I have to say the SIM is incredible. So much more stable, less spin, and faster for me.
Golf Buddy totally agree!!
You guys are awesome, I am in the market for a driver change (with a limited budget) and I was thinking of the rogue vs the newer models and you just answered my question very clearly. Now if I can get a shaft to suit it, I will be in business. Thank you...
Agree that Mavrik not substantially different from Rogue. Tested Mavrik SZ last week and game Rogue SZ currently. Not much different with stock Evenflow Riptide shaft. Confirmed my decision that I’m not $700 unhappy... thanks guys!
It'll be great to see the year on year comparisons, hope you have a 2015 Great Big Bretha - 'cause I just picked one up!
Matt's back swing is a little shorter than last year but I see a good bit more power and higher swing speed from my perspective. I remember then you guys were comparing Epic Flash against Rogue at the time. Rogue numbers are better this year than last. Swing change or hitting the weight room?
I was anxious to hit the Mavrik until you said it was the same as the Rogue. I had a 9 degree Rogue with a Diamana D+ 70 stiff shaft for about 1 month because it was about 20 - 30 yards shorter than my 2016 M1 8.5 degree with a Aldila Rogue silver 70 stiff shaft. It didn't make sense to me. I'm still playing my M1.
That is nuts how close they are and how consistent Matty is swinging wow
I have the Rogue sub zero and love it and have no plans on upgrading. If I had a driver that was 4 or more years older maybe I would look to upgrade but drivers that are only 2-3 years old the differences are gonna be small in my opinion .
Looking forward to the 2016 M2. I'm constantly checking up on Golfavenue for one in good nick.
I play the Rogue so good to see the new one is basically the same. No changes for me this year.
Can you also do the OG GBB Epic comparison? As I feel that it's been swept under the carpet and not talked about anymore - since it was so revolutionary and BIG on release (especially starting the Jailbreak Technology)?
Great video as usual gentlemen. Thanks. I'm looking forward to the 2017 M1 driver test.
Will be more interested in comparisons with the standard mavrick tho. I have been very impressed with that having tested it 3 times. I find it very, very consistent and forgiving.
Love that you're going to test the older drivers and compare them to the newer driver heads. I'm hitting a Titleist 913 that I was never fitted for. Time for a new one?
Great content guys. Can't wait to see how the 2016 M2 matches up to 2020 Driver offerings.
Really interesting and true test, we learn a lot from you guys about technology.
Good job guys! Can you repeat the test to hit intentionally off center? Like 1/2" to the heel or 1/2" to the toe? On the other hand, I suspect there is a slightly more noticeable difference between the performance of the standard Mavrik and the Rogue driver due to the new head shape design of the standard Mavrik.
Loving this series...Keep up the great work.
Looking forward to visiting you guys next month for an assessment. I'll be like a kid in a candy store with all the options
Great video as usual....I hate to nag but most golfers I see are playing 6,7,8,9 year old drivers. Please test the new stuff with their older counterparts so we know whether to upgrade. Cheers.
Great work, as always. I learn something every time you guys post a video. Thanks!!!
WOW! I think a majority of this type of testing will prove much the same, there is a negligible difference now that drivers are maxed out for better players. The better test is moderate and slower swingers who aren’t hitting it mostly the same swing to swing.
I love this new series, gents. Being a recent convert to the PING G410 Plus, I’m interested to see the PING comparison. As you implied, it’s as much a test of how good previous models were as how good the new ones are in comparison. 👍🏻
Loved the review, could you do one with the Mavrik 3 woods vs the Flash 3 woods.
Keep up the great work!!!
Would love if you did a comparison between the Mavrik fairway woods and last years Flash and SZ fairway woods.
"The more things change, the more they remain the same", (Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr 1808 - 1890)
If you need someone to test Mavrik with a low heel strike.......I'm your man!
Bandit Baker When was Jean-Baptist Alphonse Karr on your Podcast Bandit I must have missed that episode?😂 You got my vote for you to be a TXG tester I know you have been practicing your robot moves all winter. #txgdancingstars👍
@@whiskerrub LOL I think that he predates Podcasts somewhat, he was a pretty good essayist and philosopher though I'm not sure that his Putting & Short game was up to much.
Yep, I just need my TXG Bucket hat and my Robotics will be fully up and running......as long as I'm allowed regular Nap breaks 😴😴😴
Rogue SZ was so good out of the bottom of the face, but punishing low spin out of the high toe. Are you seeing improvement in Mavrik in those areas now that you've had a bit of time to work with it.
Do you have any heal strikers in house to give it a go:)
For someone like Matt, who is a far more consistent driver than the average Joe, but also can hit it 35 yards deep into the trees given his length, the non sexy benefit of having a lower standard deviation on misses may not sound like a reason to spend $500 dollars on a driver, but the reality of golf, as everyone knows, is being 270 down the middle off the tee versus 270 in the first cut of rough, is probably 1/2 a potential shot for your average handicapper - and that is the reason for everyone to look at these new more stable drivers - they will actually help your score over the season. For me this is similar logic to replacing your bladed 4 iron with a cavity backed 4 iron or hybrid - you are doing it specifically to help your ability to score better.
looking at Matt's flight - I would go for Mavrick. It seems that Stability is the word for 2020. keeping a ball on the fairway and trusting your club to land on the fairway is worth a lot. I still have a Epic Subzero which is great.
Thank you for another great video . Owning a Rogue SZ I clearly have no reason yet for a new one
Still happy with my Rogue SZ and Ventus blue!!
Excellent video TXG! A request for a new video....Matt testing the iconic late 1990s driver - Titleist 975D with 7.5 or 8.5 degrees and a 43.5 inch DG x100 shaft tipped ala Tiger Woods style! We remember Tiger winning the slam with that driver and carrying 330 yard drives. This could illustrate how powerful Tiger was before all the tech advances of today. Also his Titleist TP 15 degree 3 wood with the same shaft he could hit 290+....I still have one and it’s a hard one to hit and played more like a 5 wood actually.
A balata or Pro 90 golf ball would make this even more interesting. How far could Matt hit it with this set up?
Matt, your short game must be just fair. Your driving should be on tour. Great video guys. Keep up the great work
Can I ask what the baseline setup was? Guessing 9 degrees (S), N, and 14g weight back?
thanks for the comparison. I'll hold off buying new this year.
LOVE LOVE this series. Was wondering if you would be doing any test with Matt’s slower 96 mph swings like you did with the duo soft ball. I was amazed how consistent Matt can swing at a slower speed quite impressive. For me it adds a lot of interest. Thanks for this content it’s fantastic.
will be working on that average speed delivery so we can start to include it in videos when needed 👍
I want the taylormade M2 2016 so bad. I still use it and love it. Don’t know if it’s worth it. I still hit it really well, but is the forgiveness that much better to switch.
Do you guys have any plans to compare the mizuno ST180 vs the new 200?
In fact, we were lied : all the work done with A.I. is to find new colors.
thanks for the honesty boys. worthy video!
Yes. Been looking forward to someone doing this. Thanks
Amazing striking Matty boy! I have the Rouge driver (not sub zero) and can confirm that it is extremely forgiving on low heel strikes. Bafflingly good compared to my old driver. Maybe the "super computer"' isn't as new as they say it is?
I am loving the comparisons. Keep it up.
What a beautiful swing.
Ian’s assessment of Mavrik and who it appeals too confirmed to me why I was fitted for one. Heel strikes still go a mile.
I have the Rogue Sub Zero and love it! Been waiting for this comparison.