History Of The Douglas Aircraft Company - From Glory To Demise (Part 3)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 чер 2024
- Today we complete our exploration of the history of the Douglas Aircraft company.
Recommended reading:
amzn.to/3LpaCG9 (McDonnell Douglas Aircraft since 1920, Vol I)
amzn.to/3Lp7Mkx (McDonnell Douglas Aircraft since 1920, Vol II)
amzn.to/44PGz1h (Honest Vision: The Donald Douglas Story)
amzn.to/44QnmN0 (Doland W. Douglas: A Hear With Wings)
Looking for aviation-themed art? → ikarusart.net/
Want to join the community? Visit our Discord - / discord
Want to support the channel? I have a Patreon here - / rexshangar
Sources:
Francillon.R.J (1979), McDonnel Douglas Aircraft Since 1920: Volume I & Volume II.
Morrison.W.H (1991). Donald W. Douglas, a Heart with Wings.
Filucci.J.B (2018), Honest Vision: The Donald Douglas Story.
Time Magazine, various articles, 1940-1952.
0:00 Intro
1:10 The Post-War Slump
6:43 DC-3 Super & DC-6
18:27 Experimental Jet Aircraft & Rocketry
27:24 Korean War Revival
30:49 Trouble Brewing, And The DC-7
37:36 Douglas DC-8 vs Boeing 707
44:40 Douglas Jr Takes Over
52:51 Douglas DC-9
55:56 The Collapse Of The Company
01:03:19 Reflections - Наука та технологія
F.A.Q Section
Q: Do you take aircraft requests?
A: I have a list of aircraft I plan to cover, but feel free to add to it with suggestions:)
Q: Why do you use imperial measurements for some videos, and metric for others?
A: I do this based on country of manufacture. Imperial measurements for Britain and the U.S, metric for the rest of the world, but I include text in my videos that convert it for both.
Q: Will you include video footage in your videos, or just photos?
A: Video footage is very expensive to licence, if I can find footage in the public domain I will try to use it, but a lot of it is hoarded by licencing studies (British Pathe, Periscope films etc). In the future I may be able to afford clips :)
Q: Why do you sometimes feature images/screenshots from flight simulators?
A: Sometimes there are not a lot of photos available for certain aircraft, so I substitute this with digital images that are as accurate as possible.
26:52 you're forgetting the 100-400 US Gal series of external Aero fuel tanks, also designed by Douglas, and their D-704 A/A42R-1 "Buddy" Refueling Pod ... these served for decades in the military
Rex, I had a question. I had recently seen a documentary on the Boeing 737 max crashes. It said that the a big reason for crashes was the disjointed communication between the commercial and the engineering departments and more focus on pleasing the shareholders, a problem, the documentary said carried on from McDonnell douglas. So, was this 1966 chaos, a start of all these problems as well? I would like to see the McDonnell Douglas story as well.
As a former MDC employee, I greatly enjoyed this episode. Great work. Have you considered doing a review of the Grumman aircraft? Though most folks would think of the F-14's, etc, having served in the USCG, and spent many hours crewing on the HU-16E Albatross seaplanes as radio operator or navigator, I'd love to see more on the "Grumman Iron Works", as we used to call them. Loud, slow, and built like a brick bunker, the HU-16's served with other services. Most of our "Goats" in the USCG were in fact former Air Force and Navy aircraft. Thanks.
@@ajayKumarajayKumar-hr7sj McDonnell Douglas had great success through the 70s and 80s up until about 1990 but then there were a lot of cascading factors that ended up with them merging with Boeing. They developed the F-15, F-18, DC-10, MD-80 and -90 and those all sold well, but the introduction of ETOPS regulations in the 80's relegated the DC-10 to increasingly becoming a thing of the past, limited commercial success of the MD-11 meant to replace the DC-10, and their concept for a double decker airliner called the MD-12 never received any orders because airlines knew that MCD was not in any sort of position to develop such a large aircraft. The cold war ended somewhat abruptly, leading to the drastic reduction in the procurement of military aircraft, along with losing out on 2 major potential contracts and severely hurt the company. In just over 2 years from 90-92 they had lost or laid off 30% of their employees and in 97 they finally had a massive stock swap with Boeing and Boeing was the company that survived in name.
@@Cynsham Ok, thanks for telling. I will look it more in my spare time.
"One should never grow old where one was once great."
- Donald W. Douglas (1892 - 1981)
The hard work and dedication that goes into the videos is very much appreciated by the viewers. Thank you!
Very interesting and thorough ongoing history of the Douglas Aircraft Company. I had an experience in 1966 that may shed some light on the DC-8 segment. That year, I took my first-ever flight on an airliner at age 22, which happened to be a Boeing 707, flying from Buffalo to Los Angeles non-stop. Even bought a new suit for the occasion, as everyone dressed up for flights in those long-ago days. As luck would have it, I had a window seat (thoroughly enjoying passage above the Grand Canyon) and struck up a conversation with my seatmate to the left, who turned out to be a Boeing engineer. As our discussion went on, I asked him why the visibly apparent similarities between the older 707 design and the Douglas DC-8 and the Convair 880. They appeared to me to be virtual clones of the 707. He laughed, then explained that Boeing was required by the government to share their drawings and specifications for the 707 to its other competitors because its development and production contract included much work on the KC-135 tanker variant. Thus was Douglas and Convair able to get their DC-8 and Convair 880 clones into the air with much foreshortened development time. If you put all three in a row, only an aircraft maven could tell them apart by small physical details, such as the nose vents on the DC-8 and the lack of the foreward-reaching antenna on the verticle stabilizer so distinctive on the 707 but missing on the DC-8 and 880. Otherwise, they are like three peas in a pod. I have never seen the Boeing engineer's explanation written up or presented by video, but have no reason to not believe it's perfectly true. RICHARD M. VOLKMER
Rex, as a 55+ year old Aerospace Engineer and Historian myself, your research, presentation, and storytelling are simply amazing!!
You know it's a good day when Rex uploads
Indeed ❤
These comments are honestly what makes it all worth it :)
Shut up
This series is fantastic! I definitely love your work! Some other suggestions - A History of SAAB, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin would be fine additions to your channel. Keep up the good work!
Agreed SAAB would be interesting
Fokker would be interesting.
@@washingtonradioBanger of a suggestion! I am all for this! Junkers, Messerschmitt and Heinkel could be promising as well. Or something obscure like the Italian aircraft companies of WW2 or the French companies of WW2.
Here's a vote for SAAB as well, but frankly I'd love to see almost any company covered like this.
@@BadByte That will be crazy ride with them having at one point made (or owning a maker of) everything from air planes (both civilian and military), cars, missiles, radars, guns (as in heavy artillery), ships, submarines, torpedoes, rocket launchers, recoilless rifles. And then whole host of smaller stuff and amount of "sweden needs this, SAAB go make do this doo hickey thingea for us." and auxiliary stuff to go along with those main products.
Sweden is bit crazy with essentially 3 main defence conglomerates by now after all of the mergers consolidations and re-groupings. SAAB group (the conglomeratest of them all), BAE Systems Bofors (you need big gun, you call bofors), BAE Systems Häglunds (you need land vehicles, you call Häglunds). Like at one point SAAB owned all of Bofors also. Though they sold off the "big guns" part retaining the "we make missiles" part.
Spent a lot of time on Eastern and Delta -6s as a kid domestically, made my first Transatlantic trip to London on a Pan Am DC-7C "Seven Seas' . 12 pounding hours to then London Airport, 7 smooth hours back on a brand new B-707. It changed everything. One nitpick: The Boeing Dash 80 was the prototype for what became the KC-135 Tanker. The fuselage was, and is, narrower and shorter than the 707.
The military 707 is the C-137…
The (original) 717 is the C-135…
I flew the DC-8 for 10 years. LOVED THAT JET! All that was needed was 2 motors, no hydraulics, no electricity, could fly around the world. Great jet.
Damn. You know, sometimes I put your videos on in the background, not really looking, just to have calm in my head, but this, this series is a true masterpiece.
Wow. I found Donald Douglas senior to be a very inspirational figure steady and patient but he knew exactly when it was time to fold em and lived out the rest of his life happily with pride and dignity very inspirational.
Fantastic story, with a fantastic individual, at the helm of a grand company. He lived to 88, and spent his retirement doing his other love of life. Who could complain about that.
This epic 3 part story of Douglas aircraft might be your best yet, brilliant!
I was waiting for one thing I remember to come up, the stretch DC-8's, I used to see them at Birmingham airport occasionally, definitely not enough of them, though. I think airport announcer used to call them by that name, in the days when they announced the arrival of every single plane! (Not including small private planes).
He did refer to them as teh Super 60's
My step father worked at the Santa Monica plant starting in 1952 installing instrument panels in C-124’s and retired some twenty years later as a metallurgist involved in Douglas’ space program endeavors. I guess that he got out at about the right time. Times have certainly changed: no more Douglas Aircraft and the Santa Monica of today is somewhat disappointing, even to the extent of closing Clover Field in the next few years. Sad.
Thanks for wonderful presentation of the Douglas story.
The Super Connie was in a league of its own when it came to looks. By far the best looking piston airliner ever made. Truly a work of art.
Hey Rex,
Thank you for your efforts. my wife and I love watching these. I watch them alot during lunch or in the evening after dinner.
That's lovely, sir. Many of us do the same all of the world.
Awesome 3 part series Rex, looking forward to more in the future
Nice surprise part 3 popping up today especially with your ‘life issues’ going on.
Thanks for this series on Douglas, it was really interesting.
This movie is a noble and very precious masterpiece .
Thanks Rex. Great presentation.
As a fluid dynamics guy, I am always impressed with the early British jet airliner nose designs. Contrasting them to the American shapes, you can easily see that all current airliners mimic the Brits.
The thing I like about this series, and indeed this channel, is that it's the right balance of detail and wider pictures; it gives a concise précis of any possible tangents where other UA-camrs may be given to rambling; and everything is presented in a clear, logical way that's intended to be easily understood, when TV documentaries would have long deviated into minutiae and hot takes from various talking heads to drum up drama. No adverts, no faffing about, no filler. Rex has by himself blown these people with far bigger budgets out of the water.
My favorite Douglas aircraft is the DC-6B especially in Western Airlines (WAL) livery. Great continuation of the history of Douglas Aircraft Co. and thanks for sharing!
These three episodes are outstanding. Excellent!
Incredible work! As a former A-4 Skyhawk maintainer and former McDonnell Douglas employee, this answers a lot of questions that I've been carrying around!
Sir, I had a question. I had recently seen a documentary on the Boeing 737 max crashes. It said that the a big reason for crashes was the disjointed communication between the commercial and the engineering departments and more focus on pleasing the shareholders, a problem, the documentary said carried on from McDonnell douglas. Can, you please tell a bit more on your experiences, as I would like to listen from you. Also, do you think that the 1966 chaos was anything to do with how the McDonnell Douglas company was?
@@ajayKumarajayKumar-hr7sj I was at McDonnell Douglas about 30 years ago, in St. Louis. James McDonnell's nephews were running the company, and didn't seem to have a vision for running the company. Nepotism is usually a bad idea and tends to not produce the best results. It was a very large company, and I have no idea what problems they were having at the Douglas side of the business.
@@SkyhawkSteve Err. That sounds problematic. By the way, how was your experience?
@@ajayKumarajayKumar-hr7sj I was working in military aerospace at McDonnell Douglas, and as Rex's video shows, it is a very volatile industry. Business dried up after the Soviet Union broke up, and I went to another employer. The work at McDonnell Douglas was fun while it lasted, though! Very interesting and challenging.
It is interesting that Douglas and Boeing went straight from Pistons to jets unlike the Bristol and Vickers companies which had Turboprop airliners.
And Gloster went from biplanes to jets…
The British were the first to fly a turboprop aircraft (a Gloster Meteor) so had a more detailed understanding of those engines.
Basically jets preceded turboprops in development - and the USAF wanted speed above all. Turbofans were used instead.
And Convair!
Another fantastic series! Your documentaries are really broadcast quality - perhaps even better, content wise. On top of that, your presentation style is entertaining and occasionally funny without distracting from the material. Great job!
My first flight on a plane was on a Douglas DC8 in 1963 from London to Toronto. I was 6 years old. Dont remember much about it but that's why I watched this. Many thanks.
A. Full. Hour. Let’s go!
Loved seeing this, what a journey! And no apologies needed for the videos being spread out, they were LONG.
My Dad was the leadman in Douglas El Segundo Prototype, dept 592, I think. He work with Ed Heinemann directly on many projects during the late 1940s and all though the 1950s and early 60s. He actually had a big hand in building the D-558-1, D-558-2, the F3D, F4D and F5D Skylancer, only about 4 built also not mentioned, the AD, A2D Skyshark which was not mentioned, only about a dozen built but it looked like an AD with a turboprop and counter rotating props. The prop system had lots of problems. He also built the first A3D SkyWarrior and A4D Skyhawk. Lots of stories, but not here. The story was how do you tell the difference between a DC-6 and DC-7, all used the basic fuselage and wing of the DC-4 with different engines but the big difference between a 6 and a 7 was a DC-6 had four engines with three blade props and a DC-7 had 3 (operative) engines and 4 blade props. That's because not so much because the R-3350, but DC-7 had turbo compound engines each engine having three Power recovery turbines (PRT) (driven by exhaust gases) which was connected back through the crankshaft. Very complicated. Later Super Connies, 1049C and G and 1649 had the same issues with turbo compound R3350.
Nice insight.
Excellent presentation 👏..I never got to fly on a DC-8 but throughout my childhood was fortunate to have many memories on board the DC-9 and occasionally the DC-10 ..the last flight on a DC-9 for me was on northwest airlines in 2006..what a workhorse of an aircraft! and very well built as many remain in service beyond the 40 year mark
Rex has surpassed himself , this was Excellent ..great footage , research ..This is what you sign up for , the Constellation looked like the lower half of a Womans leg and the Boeing 707 was a great looking battery operated Toy I had in the 60's an I luv'd it ..They still rule for me..
Congratulations for a well researched and fully explanatory series of the Douglas company. Keep up the excellent work with other histories of iconic companies and aircraft. We cannot have enough of them.
This was an amazing series, loved it and hope you do more when you get the chance!
You did a very good job with the three-part series on Douglas. I will keep you in my prayers for health
A great series about Douglas. Thank you, Rex.
Wow. What a fantastic, well researched, and thorough series. Bring us more. I would love to see a video about Ed Hieneman and similar videos on all the major manufactures. It’s a target rich environment!
Thoroughly enjoyed this series - thanks Rex
This was a well-researched and presented story. Nice work.
Rex, Drachinifel liked and found your video on USA drones enjoyable. Great Job!
Not surprised; Drachinifel always seemed a man of exquisite taste.
@@roykliffen9674 I've been watching him for six months.
@@roykliffen9674 Who is Drachinifel?
@@ajayKumarajayKumar-hr7sj The Channel Drachinifel runs specialises in historic war ships, mostly from the age of steam with the occasional foreigh into sailing ships.
www.youtube.com/@Drachinifel
That is the channel name of a youtube historian the covers all things in the Sea.@@ajayKumarajayKumar-hr7sj
Stunning in breadth and information
These 3 episodes have been fantastic! Thank you for what you do well.
Very...very...well done. Thank you for all your efforts with this series. It did not disappoint. I really hope you can do more of these "History Of" with other titans of aviation...though they must take a personal toll on you, you've done a magnificent job!
Every single product made by Douglas is a work of art
Well, ugly works of art exist. Some of their planes would make Picasso blush :P
@@randomnickify well, ambitious is rarely perfect
This is the best series, thank you.
Simply fantastic!
Today is a good day
Thank you for you very informative and entertaining content. Your delivery of the material is superb. Showing interest but not being unnecessarily overly emotive. Great professional work
32:59 well I think in a case of the Douglas DC-7 finding itself beaten into service by the British Empire's Bristol Britannia, the DC-7 would be in trouble
Very fascinating and extremely well organized series. Kudos :)
Ni los documentales de history discovery channel o nat geo se comparan a la calidad y dedicacion de tus videos, soy modelador, el primer avion que hice fue el douglas dc-4 de la revista el mundo de la aviacion gracias por dedicarle tu tiempo a esa compañia GRACIAS, excelente trio de videos, saludos desde El Salvador
Excellent series, loved every minute of each part.
That was.conclusion to the series worth the wait. Congratulations!
Thanks a lot for uploading part 3 of the Douglas history series, Rex!
As always, I really enjoyed the video and the series so much.^^
Time 21:26 '1943' misspoken for an intended '1953' Mach 2 flight I presume?
Indeed
Thanks for this wonderful and well-researched history.
I just finished all three videos. Thank you I really appreciate your hard work.
Living near a major airport, I could always tell when a DC-8 was approaching. Those turbojets screamed like banshees.
It was my understanding that because of the troublesome Duplex Cyclone, the Lockheed Constellation was called "the most reliable three-engined aircraft".
This was a truly heartwarming and beautiful insight into the world of Douglas Aircraft.
Congratulations!❤
Fascinating. Excellent coverage of a huge topic from start to finish. Thanks.
I was living I. St Louis when McDonald Douglas tanked. You couldn’t give a house away during the first few months
I have found my new binge-watch channel!
Love your coverage of the inter-war aircraft, especially.
As I mentioned before, I consider these documentaries an amazing job. Well documented and organized. Congratulations
Absolutely loved it. Appreciate all the hard work that goes into all your videos.
Great video series. Thanks
Wonderful, many thanks
In hindsight we all know that the jetliner was actually launched too early. The smoke, the noise, the materials were all not up to par yet. For the military, why not, who cares. Civil, maybe 15 years would have done wonders for the safety and feasibility for jetliners. As always, impeccable quality from Rex/Chris, Thank You so much for your tireless work. Greatest youtube channel ever.
This was an excellent series and I appreciate the effort that went into the research and organization of a complex story. Now, where did that mysterious DC-5 get to?
Huge amount of diligent research is apparent here.
Good on you, Rex!
Great Job Rex‼️
What an incredible amount of work Chris. Well done! It's a really enjoyable series. Love your use of the word recalcitrant.
Many thanks for a fascinating and well researched series on Douglas aircraft. Thoroughly enjoyed all 3 of this series. Please do more on other corporations
Brilliant three part offering! Thank you for your hard work.
Thank you --- Lot's of good information in this. My uncle was an aircraft mechanic for United (circa 1960s) and spoke very highly about the manufacturing integrity of Douglas aircraft, specifically, the DC8. As for military, the A4 Skyhawk was superb.
Great series Rex, really enjoyed it, can't wait to see which company you will tackle next.
Rex, you blew me away with this series! There’s a lot of good business development and drama to mine. On both sides of the ocean, even.
I know this requires a lot of effort, but I realy hope you will make similar documentaries about other aircraft manufacturers in the future. I have searched/waited for years for something like that. 😅 You are doung a fantastic job.
Outstanding job Rex
A great finale to a excellent series! Thank you Rex!
Well presented history lesson. Thanks Rex!
Suggestion... if you have a multi-part video series, it needs to be linked in the video description. This is the first video of yours I've ever seen and that's the first place I went to find Part 1 and 2.
Another fantastic production from you. Please keep it up!
Great job covering the Douglas story!!!
Very interesting. Something that was not given much consideration was the environment Douglas operated in, that is So. California. I lived in that area from the early 1980's to mid 2010's and it was like death one factory at a time. Douglas Santa Monica was practically forced out by the city of Santa Monica. The LA Airport area, including El Segundo drove off No. American and Douglas. Northrup left Hawthorne and Lockheed turned it's Burbank facility into a shopping center. Hughes turned Culver City into a condo development. The aircraft industry in So. California just died and local governments did not care. This was the world that Douglas grew up in and died in. When Boeing took over MD they were really troubled by the C-17 orders that made them keep the Long Beach factory open because they really wanted out. When Douglas grew it was because their was an environment that attracted dreamers and innovators. Lockheed, Northrop, Hughes, the founders of North American were all a tight bunch and shared their ideas and talented workers. By the later 20th century the grandchildren of that population had grown bored with the whole business and killed the golden goose. It was more profitable to be in the real estate business than build aircraft.
Another great peace of work really enjoyed this series. Hope you do Mcdonald Douglas a big fan of the phantom.
That certainly is required.
I enjoyed this series.
Thank you 🎉
Excellent video. Thanks.
A great story Rex, thank you, cheers Gerard
Fantastic Documentary Set
Great series Rex.
Great production, thank you.
Outstanding history.
51:30 - I had no idea NW had DC-8s, I just noticed it on this photo. Love how both the DC-8 and the 707 were of a similar basic layout, yet both were different and had their own distinctive identity.
Absolutely fantastic series! Great job on the in-depth research, sure, but the analysis was extremely well done. Any analysis of a subject must start with a clean slate, free of opinions and bias. Then begins the job of compiling all the facts available on the subject. Even here, there is an element of bias that must be overcome: How many facts are enough; the answer lies in this: Once you have reached a point in the research that any additional information neither changes the outcome of the analysis nor substantially reinforces the conclusions of that analysis, then you have acquired enough facts and data to withstand any peer review or, indeed, any challenge to the veracity of your arguments, analysis and conclusions. It is, as I like to say, complete. This series is complete.
Top notch series. Thanks for the effort. Awesome!
Outstanding! Looking forward to more like this.
Another great video
Thanks