In addition, it doesn't matter, if the character was historically an animal person - films will do the classic "you really thought he was that good?" **Proceeds to show a scene where the character hits/kicks/shoots muh innocent dawg**
Ironic. Wasn't for this video, I'd no know Faucci did this. I already loathe the guy over the pandemics authoritarianism. But I just love dogs. Way more than most people I know. And I think there should be a special kind of sadistic coward to harm a beagle. This dog is different. Is the most docile and friendly being someone will ever see. I can not express enough how much I hate this half man. Sure, people might take me for a simple, emotion driven person. Don't care. I know what made me come this way during my life. Faucci is not a man.
I live near Ft. Campbell Ky and in 2003 the university of Kentucky discovered that a specific biting sandfly capable of being a vector of leishmaniasis was found in the western part of the state. While at war in Iraq and Afghanistan thousands of troops returning were infected with the old type of this leishmaniasis. The NIH found in a study of the surrounding areas of military bases Ft. Campbell posed the greatest concern for introduction of this non endemic parasite. The Afghanistan type of this leishmaniasis had over the centuries become temperate adapted due to Afghanistan's cooler mountain climate. I know this leishmaniasis is spreading in the area because I and several friends and family have been infected but doctors cognitive dissonance does not allow them to open their eyes. I had to do all the research myself to discover what was happening but I was made to feel like I was crazy when it is obvious to anyone capable of critical thinking and an unbiased mindset.
The empathy is cheap and will be lost on most folks after five minutes..... but it does also add to the nastiness of Fauci and co to those with a higher priority towards morality.
My question is why did they specifically use the more painful method of infection which also was less standardized? Surely directly injecting the dogs with the pathogen to be tested would only aid the experiment? If I was testing the human ability to re-learn balance despite loss of the vestibular system, my experiment would not begin with hammering a nail into each ear until the subject became dizzy. That a person who _allegedly_ swore to "do no harm" accepted such a half-ass methodology speaks to either his cruelty or his incompetence.
Great insight at the end about morality and why the normies "just do not get it" regarding moral issues. Namely that they do not have a developed sense of morality.
beagles are not docile dogs. theyre hunting dogs. theyre like blood hounds. when theyre old they calm down but they bark and bite like crazy when they're young. they have a ton of energy. my cousin had her lip bitten off her face by a beagle.
Dog toys squeek because it resembles the sound of an animal while it's being killed. Dogs don't empathize for animals being tortured, on the contrary, they love to slowly kill another animal by shaking It then letting it try to run away and then chasing it and shaking it again. They do this over and over until the other animal stops moving or making sound.
@@amadiohastruck4331 dogs are flawless in their devotion to their owners. Exhibit loyalty few humans ever do. They're the only animals that mankind didn't have to 'break' ,they decided to come on down and cast their lot with humans. You have to train them but they're the only animals coming domesticated from out of the box. Some will say cats do,and I love kitties too, but a dog is down for whatever as long as it's with you. They gladly submit. Cats allow you to take care of them,lol. Statement is semi facetious but I know you get the point. The natives from northern most Alaska say there's no way they could have survived without the dogs. Especially concerning polar bears,they say the dogs just know how to fight off the bears. The world's a dangerous place even with civilized safeguards, dogs are perfect for the role they play which is a necessity even today.
Personally, I think any animal experimentation is unjustifiable, except stuff that doesn't hurt the animals, and stuff on creatures that don't feel pain.
@@johnElden8760 I agree but it’s also not people like us the push things forward. Think of all the evil science that was done to figure out how the human body works, how the heart pumps, etc. I would venture to guess many were dissected alive via torture and studied. Good moral people aren’t remembered. Good moral people don’t do whatever it takes it solve problems. I’m not saying Faucci was doing this, I’m saying that people who are willing to do evil are the ones who gain power and are remembered in history.
Just curious, can you think of any alternatives? Animal research and experiments broaden our understanding immensely and, I think, that without it the drug research would be slowed down if not halted It's kind of like those German experiments in concentration camps. Were they evil and inhumane? They absolutely were and I hope everybody agrees, BUT they did give us a peek into human biology (regarding effects of different substance's on human body, for example) unlike ever before (especially if you consider how many of those psychopathic scientist later emigrated to the States) To me at least, it seems like we gain the most knowledge from dangerous mistakes/evil things
@@mariaconcepcionrodriguezhe2850 Thank you for the sarcastic comment, really appreciated it. I think you kinda misunderstood my stance. I don't support animal testing in the broad sense, but rather think it's a necessary evil if we want to further our understanding of, for example, medicine and substance's effects on a body. Animal testing is really the only way we could achieve that unless you want to get some volunteers with clearly masochistic tendencies (in which case, go on, I won't stop you) Look, animal testing is not perfect. It's kinda like in an example with humans and dogs eating chocolate - it's mostly fine for humans, but will kill your dog. Fortunately though, I have heard researchers are working on a device or something along those lines that'd allow them to test how different substances will react in a human body without having to employ a human or an animal. That's really good news for both researches and animal rights activists Have a blessed day
Why don't we use prisoners for this kind of research? If it absolutely has to be done it would be much more useful and humane to do these experiments on cruel criminal fucks than innocent animals.
Harming humans is everything BUT humane. your pupper is a useless toy wich tests can be made with. No human testing needed. Rats are inocent as well, but who cares? Pigs are even smarter than dogs, but who cares? Vegans, and they are weird.
I hope you're vegetarian cuz that's the only way you'd be morally consistant here considering it would just be picking and choosing what innocent animals, as you said, you'd be sacrificing for personal gain.
Fair point! Observing power structures in institutions is crucial for a broader understanding of why things happen and may provide insights as to where we're headed... but I don't see much reason not to zoom in and scrutinize the individual actors within the institutions that carry out its function. There seems to be a severe lack of accountability, hardly a sense of justice especially where we find high level crimes. If the individuals who participate in atrocities have to confront their personal responsibility, it just might do something in the direction of reducing the rampant corruption saturating these institutions. Otherwise, will we remain in a futile feedback loop whereby banksters (for example) extort massive wealth from taxpayers through bailouts because they are 'too big to fail' or some nonsense? In the case of Fauci, having a face to point to can be a gateway for normies to make deeper connections to the bigger issues... but if the conversation loses the component of individual agency, people lose interest in the more abstract concepts as institutional power which seems impossible to defend against. With specific actions associated with specific names, perhaps more traction could be developed to respond appropriately? Love your work, huge thanks!!
Empathy is not the lowest weakest level of morality. And it is certainly not A-moral. And not everyone even has it, and those that do… have different levels of it. And while certain animals do exhibit some sort of similar signs… it is not clearly understood and more closely resembles sympathy. The ability to not only imagine what another person is feeling, but also an ability to to see things via their perspective in order to understand their rationale and behaviors… are both evolved skills that involve higher levels of intellect and understanding. Furthermore, you are underestimating the callous nature of those whom preform and conduct and allow such experiments. Whether it be on animals or humans… exacting unnecessary torture and suffering absolutely coincides with Fauci’s ability to call for such mandates and continue doing so in spite of knowing the numerous hardships people would inevitably experience.
Empanthy on social creatures exists as a evolutionary mechanism If you have already defeated your rival and he is on his last legs down on the floor there is no need to attempt to finish him off you have already proven to be too strong for him because what other option would you leave him other than put all of his last remaining effort to take you down with him Even a broken hand or leg can be a death sentence when the next challenge arrives in the future in nature That is why you can see posturing and alpha beta dynamics all over nature submision > death
@@crazydude5714same species also kill. What you are saying is more so human intricacies and mostly just imagination and art we create to tell unique stories
You could argue that it would be far more valuable to kill every enemy which would allow your seed to be the dominant or only seed in the community. Empathy directly gets in the way of the evolutionary process. You allow weaker genes to prosper for absolutely no advantage. The strong offspring eventually mix with the weak offspring and it dilutes the gene pool. Your theory doesnt make sense from the perspective of darwinian evolution. Plus there’s a massive risk that your adversary could attack you again at a later date. It makes no sense to take all of these unnecessary risks in an evolutionary perspective. Finishing an adversary is far less risky than allowing them to regain their strength and probably go on to directly challenge you in the future.
What is this channel??? I dont mean this as an insult, it seems awesome. But i just found the channel, and i see eating bugs, white babies, jewish podcast guests, anthony faucci killing dogs, and political philosophy. This is like a ketamine hallucination that is also for some reason extremely well thought out and full of nuanced arguments.
Sooo glad theres a c19 warning on this video. What would I ever do without being told how to think!?! Excuse me, I must go buy this new face cream because Kim K swears it's the only thing that keeps her young and fresh....
I'm just going through your videos, watching, up voting, sharing. Apparently comments also help with the algorithm (though I realize you're not likely to reply). I appreciate your take here, it is honest and unbiased. That said, I think you're missing a major piece in the context of your other videos. There is an unlimited number of things happening at sny moment that will make countless people furious. That is why, dog torture pisses me off... when I hear about it. I simply don't have the time (or mental fortitude) to soend my time seeking out all the awful things in the world to be upset about. You said we don't care, this isn't true, we just can't care about everything. Why did I bother making this distinction? Media representation. People will only be furious about what they see. Yes, all of your moral criticisms still apply, but to me, the greater issue here is the unlimited content people want to engage with and who filters that content. Amazing channel, thank you and keep up the good work!
The problem is why dogs? They are really close to us historically to the fact we have evolved alongside eachother. Shouldn't we be testing on the worst of the worst humans. The idea that they are humans does NOT make up for their sins. I am not here to exegerate the bad things X did. Infact if it was a hoax like some have questionably said, i would be more glad. Politics is not supwrior to morality and the safety of the innocent
@@rodionraskolnikov3853 seriously, how can you say something so stupid. A man who has raped and tortured children is better than a loyal dog who has saved his owner. Painstakingly idiotic
@@stegotyranno4206 Dogs are incapable of abstract thought, so are unable to do moral acts, but even the worst humans have the capacity to do good this in itself places all humans above dogs.
@@rodionraskolnikov3853 why do they allow people like you in public. Dogs may not have complex abstract thoughts, but they have moral senses and usually will care for their owners. Perhaps you are getting confused with cats?
Stop with the dog idealization thing, they are using cute animals as replacements for the natural instinct every human have for creating children. In shorts get less dogs and have more children.
Why did you not wear a mask? How many older, immunosuppressed individuals did you infect? Unknown to you how many may have suffered or died from your subclinical infection. Do you understand gain of function science?
were you wearing a surgical mask for the fifty flu seasons before covid, or did you need a massive state and media campaign during the COVID-19 outbreak to manipulate you into making mask wearing part of your basic personality? yeah, that's what I thought.
i have been told by filmmakers that killing a dog is a way to instantly make a character look evil. it's a thing
In JoJo's Bizarre adventure it happens regularly lol.
But cats never fave such doom.
In addition, it doesn't matter, if the character was historically an animal person - films will do the classic "you really thought he was that good?" **Proceeds to show a scene where the character hits/kicks/shoots muh innocent dawg**
@@LegsON You didn't watch part 3
@@Home_Rich Referring to "Look Who's Back", I would assume
What a retarded scene in an otherwise great film
@@nebroc8903
Spot on👍
He actually did horrific experiments on children in the early 90s, too. They died.
Don’t forget the early 2020s
@@rishg134 thats still ongoing though
@@user-vv1do1wg1j Excellent deduction.
What was it called
can i get some info? im curious
Ironic. Wasn't for this video, I'd no know Faucci did this. I already loathe the guy over the pandemics authoritarianism. But I just love dogs. Way more than most people I know. And I think there should be a special kind of sadistic coward to harm a beagle. This dog is different. Is the most docile and friendly being someone will ever see. I can not express enough how much I hate this half man.
Sure, people might take me for a simple, emotion driven person. Don't care. I know what made me come this way during my life. Faucci is not a man.
I live near Ft. Campbell Ky and in 2003 the university of Kentucky discovered that a specific biting sandfly capable of being a vector of leishmaniasis was found in the western part of the state. While at war in Iraq and Afghanistan thousands of troops returning were infected with the old type of this leishmaniasis. The NIH found in a study of the surrounding areas of military bases Ft. Campbell posed the greatest concern for introduction of this non endemic parasite. The Afghanistan type of this leishmaniasis had over the centuries become temperate adapted due to Afghanistan's cooler mountain climate. I know this leishmaniasis is spreading in the area because I and several friends and family have been infected but doctors cognitive dissonance does not allow them to open their eyes. I had to do all the research myself to discover what was happening but I was made to feel like I was crazy when it is obvious to anyone capable of critical thinking and an unbiased mindset.
I don't need to cite dog torture in order to justify my hatred of Fauci. So it's all good.
The empathy is cheap and will be lost on most folks after five minutes..... but it does also add to the nastiness of Fauci and co to those with a higher priority towards morality.
Man I'd love to be friends with this guy
Haha I had the same thought xd
@@hauntingmachine May God bless him and you man
@@sweetwagon8230 Thank you, God bless!
Cringe.
@@lucascoval828 🙏
they tend to use Beagels because they're the cutest
We could expose fraudci for being both a human and puppy torturer. Idk
too bad none of this is true lol.
My question is why did they specifically use the more painful method of infection which also was less standardized? Surely directly injecting the dogs with the pathogen to be tested would only aid the experiment? If I was testing the human ability to re-learn balance despite loss of the vestibular system, my experiment would not begin with hammering a nail into each ear until the subject became dizzy. That a person who _allegedly_ swore to "do no harm" accepted such a half-ass methodology speaks to either his cruelty or his incompetence.
9:06 There are three types of people. Those who see. Those who see when shown. Those who cannot see.
those who refuse to see
@@yankeeshoota🎯🎯🎯
Great insight at the end about morality and why the normies "just do not get it" regarding moral issues. Namely that they do not have a developed sense of morality.
beagles are not docile dogs. theyre hunting dogs. theyre like blood hounds. when theyre old they calm down but they bark and bite like crazy when they're young. they have a ton of energy. my cousin had her lip bitten off her face by a beagle.
Beagle Fauci aka "The Dog Catcher"
Dog toys squeek because it resembles the sound of an animal while it's being killed. Dogs don't empathize for animals being tortured, on the contrary, they love to slowly kill another animal by shaking It then letting it try to run away and then chasing it and shaking it again. They do this over and over until the other animal stops moving or making sound.
Dog lover's are blind to this. And I like dogs honestly, but dog worshipers see them as flawless
It's not a flaw, its an animal.
@@amadiohastruck4331
@@amadiohastruck4331 dogs are flawless in their devotion to their owners. Exhibit loyalty few humans ever do. They're the only animals that mankind didn't have to 'break' ,they decided to come on down and cast their lot with humans. You have to train them but they're the only animals coming domesticated from out of the box. Some will say cats do,and I love kitties too, but a dog is down for whatever as long as it's with you. They gladly submit. Cats allow you to take care of them,lol. Statement is semi facetious but I know you get the point. The natives from northern most Alaska say there's no way they could have survived without the dogs. Especially concerning polar bears,they say the dogs just know how to fight off the bears. The world's a dangerous place even with civilized safeguards, dogs are perfect for the role they play which is a necessity even today.
Lol I got an ad for dog food
Personally, I think any animal experimentation is unjustifiable, except stuff that doesn't hurt the animals, and stuff on creatures that don't feel pain.
same, i dont believe in any greater good, hurting dogs is to me just hurting dogs, for whatever reason or goal doesnt matter
@@johnElden8760 I agree but it’s also not people like us the push things forward. Think of all the evil science that was done to figure out how the human body works, how the heart pumps, etc. I would venture to guess many were dissected alive via torture and studied. Good moral people aren’t remembered. Good moral people don’t do whatever it takes it solve problems. I’m not saying Faucci was doing this, I’m saying that people who are willing to do evil are the ones who gain power and are remembered in history.
Just curious, can you think of any alternatives? Animal research and experiments broaden our understanding immensely and, I think, that without it the drug research would be slowed down if not halted
It's kind of like those German experiments in concentration camps. Were they evil and inhumane? They absolutely were and I hope everybody agrees, BUT they did give us a peek into human biology (regarding effects of different substance's on human body, for example) unlike ever before (especially if you consider how many of those psychopathic scientist later emigrated to the States)
To me at least, it seems like we gain the most knowledge from dangerous mistakes/evil things
@@absentspaghetti4527 ooooh nooooo not my druggerinoes whatever would i do without em
@@mariaconcepcionrodriguezhe2850 Thank you for the sarcastic comment, really appreciated it.
I think you kinda misunderstood my stance. I don't support animal testing in the broad sense, but rather think it's a necessary evil if we want to further our understanding of, for example, medicine and substance's effects on a body. Animal testing is really the only way we could achieve that unless you want to get some volunteers with clearly masochistic tendencies (in which case, go on, I won't stop you)
Look, animal testing is not perfect. It's kinda like in an example with humans and dogs eating chocolate - it's mostly fine for humans, but will kill your dog. Fortunately though, I have heard researchers are working on a device or something along those lines that'd allow them to test how different substances will react in a human body without having to employ a human or an animal. That's really good news for both researches and animal rights activists
Have a blessed day
Rousseau was wrong
Why don't we use prisoners for this kind of research? If it absolutely has to be done it would be much more useful and humane to do these experiments on cruel criminal fucks than innocent animals.
Dont be in a hurry, they will. As soon as prisons and goolags are filled up with "dissidents"
Harming humans is everything BUT humane. your pupper is a useless toy wich tests can be made with. No human testing needed. Rats are inocent as well, but who cares? Pigs are even smarter than dogs, but who cares? Vegans, and they are weird.
It’ll happen once normal guys like you and I are the prisoners lol. The criminals you speak of will be running it all.
I hope you're vegetarian cuz that's the only way you'd be morally consistant here considering it would just be picking and choosing what innocent animals, as you said, you'd be sacrificing for personal gain.
@@tritan130Eating meat is not immoral. Torturing animals is.
Fair point! Observing power structures in institutions is crucial for a broader understanding of why things happen and may provide insights as to where we're headed... but I don't see much reason not to zoom in and scrutinize the individual actors within the institutions that carry out its function.
There seems to be a severe lack of accountability, hardly a sense of justice especially where we find high level crimes. If the individuals who participate in atrocities have to confront their personal responsibility, it just might do something in the direction of reducing the rampant corruption saturating these institutions. Otherwise, will we remain in a futile feedback loop whereby banksters (for example) extort massive wealth from taxpayers through bailouts because they are 'too big to fail' or some nonsense?
In the case of Fauci, having a face to point to can be a gateway for normies to make deeper connections to the bigger issues... but if the conversation loses the component of individual agency, people lose interest in the more abstract concepts as institutional power which seems impossible to defend against. With specific actions associated with specific names, perhaps more traction could be developed to respond appropriately? Love your work, huge thanks!!
New Philosopher in da haus
Its not philosophy. Few years ago it used to be called "applying common sense". I do appreciate your appreciation of it :)
Great point about focusing on institutions vs individuals. Spot on!!!!
Empathy is not the lowest weakest level of morality. And it is certainly not A-moral. And not everyone even has it, and those that do… have different levels of it. And while certain animals do exhibit some sort of similar signs… it is not clearly understood and more closely resembles sympathy. The ability to not only imagine what another person is feeling, but also an ability to to see things via their perspective in order to understand their rationale and behaviors… are both evolved skills that involve higher levels of intellect and understanding. Furthermore, you are underestimating the callous nature of those whom preform and conduct and allow such experiments. Whether it be on animals or humans… exacting unnecessary torture and suffering absolutely coincides with Fauci’s ability to call for such mandates and continue doing so in spite of knowing the numerous hardships people would inevitably experience.
Empanthy on social creatures exists as a evolutionary mechanism
If you have already defeated your rival and he is on his last legs down on the floor there is no need to attempt to finish him off you have already proven to be too strong for him because what other option would you leave him other than put all of his last remaining effort to take you down with him Even a broken hand or leg can be a death sentence when the next challenge arrives in the future in nature
That is why you can see posturing and alpha beta dynamics all over nature
submision > death
weird ass anime villain speech tbh
and animals finish off their defeated prey literally all the time lol
@@Phoenix0F8 I am talking of the same species and pack/'tribe' when it comes to social animals
Infighting to the death is bad for the species survival
@@crazydude5714same species also kill. What you are saying is more so human intricacies and mostly just imagination and art we create to tell unique stories
@@Phoenix0F8
Bringing anime into this?
(Sigh)
Weebs......
You could argue that it would be far more valuable to kill every enemy which would allow your seed to be the dominant or only seed in the community. Empathy directly gets in the way of the evolutionary process. You allow weaker genes to prosper for absolutely no advantage. The strong offspring eventually mix with the weak offspring and it dilutes the gene pool. Your theory doesnt make sense from the perspective of darwinian evolution.
Plus there’s a massive risk that your adversary could attack you again at a later date. It makes no sense to take all of these unnecessary risks in an evolutionary perspective. Finishing an adversary is far less risky than allowing them to regain their strength and probably go on to directly challenge you in the future.
You need to sit closer to the microphone. Love your work.
What is this channel??? I dont mean this as an insult, it seems awesome. But i just found the channel, and i see eating bugs, white babies, jewish podcast guests, anthony faucci killing dogs, and political philosophy. This is like a ketamine hallucination that is also for some reason extremely well thought out and full of nuanced arguments.
Sooo glad theres a c19 warning on this video. What would I ever do without being told how to think!?! Excuse me, I must go buy this new face cream because Kim K swears it's the only thing that keeps her young and fresh....
Thanks for the info
Glad I subscribed
I'm just going through your videos, watching, up voting, sharing. Apparently comments also help with the algorithm (though I realize you're not likely to reply).
I appreciate your take here, it is honest and unbiased. That said, I think you're missing a major piece in the context of your other videos.
There is an unlimited number of things happening at sny moment that will make countless people furious. That is why, dog torture pisses me off... when I hear about it. I simply don't have the time (or mental fortitude) to soend my time seeking out all the awful things in the world to be upset about. You said we don't care, this isn't true, we just can't care about everything.
Why did I bother making this distinction?
Media representation. People will only be furious about what they see. Yes, all of your moral criticisms still apply, but to me, the greater issue here is the unlimited content people want to engage with and who filters that content.
Amazing channel, thank you and keep up the good work!
The problem is why dogs? They are really close to us historically to the fact we have evolved alongside eachother. Shouldn't we be testing on the worst of the worst humans. The idea that they are humans does NOT make up for their sins. I am not here to exegerate the bad things X did. Infact if it was a hoax like some have questionably said, i would be more glad. Politics is not supwrior to morality and the safety of the innocent
Even the worst human is greater than the best dog
@@rodionraskolnikov3853 no, and anyone who thinks that has no idea how awful their own species can be.
@@rodionraskolnikov3853 seriously, how can you say something so stupid. A man who has raped and tortured children is better than a loyal dog who has saved his owner. Painstakingly idiotic
@@stegotyranno4206 Dogs are incapable of abstract thought, so are unable to do moral acts, but even the worst humans have the capacity to do good this in itself places all humans above dogs.
@@rodionraskolnikov3853 why do they allow people like you in public. Dogs may not have complex abstract thoughts, but they have moral senses and usually will care for their owners. Perhaps you are getting confused with cats?
I've been loving your content! Keep up the good work
Send this to all the vegan activists
Not very well said. Comes off as quite arrogant.
Amazing video
❤
Dude why they are flurries amogst now
what does furries has to do with this?
Emotion.
I like how your mind works, man.
Syco
Stop with the dog idealization thing, they are using cute animals as replacements for the natural instinct every human have for creating children. In shorts get less dogs and have more children.
Why did you not wear a mask? How many older, immunosuppressed individuals did you infect? Unknown to you how many may have suffered or died from your subclinical infection.
Do you understand gain of function science?
were you wearing a surgical mask for the fifty flu seasons before covid, or did you need a massive state and media campaign during the COVID-19 outbreak to manipulate you into making mask wearing part of your basic personality? yeah, that's what I thought.
What kind of mask did you use and how often was it changed? Let's see how much protection you thought you had.