Against the Odds: Devoted to Garruk (Games)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 174

  • @MTGGoldfish
    @MTGGoldfish  7 років тому +11

    To vote for next weeks deck, head over to the article on the Goldfish site. There's a straw poll at the bottom featuring a bunch of holiday-flavored Against the Odds options! www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/against-the-odds-devoted-to-garruk

    • @dariomazzola7923
      @dariomazzola7923 7 років тому

      MTGGoldfish was a pleasure to play against you!!! Greetings profboom

  • @daltonmekis
    @daltonmekis 7 років тому +11

    "I guess we can take out Progenitus package" has to be the most spoken phrase of that episode. Good content

  • @bryantan4228
    @bryantan4228 7 років тому +63

    Seth has finally made decks 5 for each of the most important mono colored planeswalkers in game. Yes, he didn't miss any. In alphabetical order:
    Garruk (Against the Odds: Devoted to Garruk)
    Gideon (Against the Odds: Gideon Tribal)
    Jace (Against the Odds: Esper Jace Tokens)
    Liliana (Against the Odds: Liliana Tribal)
    But wait Bryan, he didn't play the most important red planeswalker?!
    Well hypothetical person, yes he did. If you paid attention to his channel, you would know that he played the most important red planeswalker first. It's so important it's more important than these other scrub cards.
    Tibalt (Against the Odds: Burning Tibalt)
    Now Seth can move on to decks based around the dual colored walkers.

    • @the_snakelicious
      @the_snakelicious 7 років тому +3

      Oh my god I didn't know he made an Against the Odds with Tibalt, I'm gonna watch that right now.

    • @bryantan4228
      @bryantan4228 7 років тому +1

      Felipe Rodrigues That was the day Seth set out on the path to play all of the most relevant planeswalkers ever printed

    • @Finngrinder
      @Finngrinder 7 років тому +2

      thaaat Chandra diss :D

    • @chuksieabani1856
      @chuksieabani1856 7 років тому

      The-Jaded he technically has a Chandra deck in budget magic. It was a mono red wildfire/land destruction deck. Non-budget version is basically Chandra tribal

    • @bryantan4228
      @bryantan4228 7 років тому +1

      Chuksie Abani If it's not in the deck name, it's not the focus :p

  • @bryantan4228
    @bryantan4228 7 років тому +63

    Seth be like "we were gonna do the whole Gatewatch, but Nissa is trash. Garruk time bois"

    • @stifle97stifle55
      @stifle97stifle55 7 років тому +6

      Nissa is trash

    • @stifle97stifle55
      @stifle97stifle55 7 років тому +10

      Nissa, bad green card
      +1 do something.
      -2 do next to nothing.
      -6 do nothing
      4

    • @totalcoward
      @totalcoward 7 років тому +8

      It’s more like he did the original 5 Planeswalkers. The only reason Wizards didn’t make Garrick a member of the Gatewatch was because of the whole Chain Veil debacle turned out. That said, I actually really enjoy Nissa because of her story/character aspects. She’s kinda the Zen Sage of the Gatewatch.

    • @bryantan4228
      @bryantan4228 7 років тому +8

      darren trivedi Man you kicked Ajani right in the balls. He was the original white planeswalker, and Seth has already done a Gideon Tribal.

    • @SomeFreakingCactus
      @SomeFreakingCactus 7 років тому

      Honestly I think he should do a planeswalker tribal video for every planeswalker. Heck, even Kiora has 3 now.

  • @DylanHunter64
    @DylanHunter64 7 років тому +62

    Tap, untap, tap, untap, tap, untap....tap....untap....

    • @Chapterhouse86
      @Chapterhouse86 7 років тому +21

      Hit our swans, draw some cards....hahaha. Tappity tap untap this time. He needs to make another song with tap untap

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761 7 років тому +2

      Chapterhouse86 discard our cards, make 32 zombies....

  • @xElMery
    @xElMery 7 років тому +31

    God, Seth was so happy in the first game lol

  • @electriicnine
    @electriicnine 7 років тому +33

    *Plays first round of video*
    *"WE FINALLY GOT IT"*

  • @sadfsdafsdfasdfasdfs
    @sadfsdafsdfasdfasdfs 7 років тому +11

    The Chain Veil : "Because the last ability modifies the rules of the game, it affects not only planeswalkers you control when it resolves, but also planeswalkers that come under your control later in the turn."

    • @Mentir42
      @Mentir42 7 років тому +1

      sadfsdafsdfasdfasdfs. It's bugged in MTGO as far as I know, only affects Planeswalkers in play due to that.

  • @venced0r5
    @venced0r5 7 років тому +5

    Now the next step is actually going infinite with The Chain Vel, with Ral Zarek to untap the veil and Garruk Wildspeaker to provide the mana.

  • @ecoKady
    @ecoKady 7 років тому +1

    One of my favorite against the odds in a while. Thanks for the video!

  • @dragaunas
    @dragaunas 7 років тому +5

    You and Richard should build 60 card singletons decks with as many scry effects as you can and play against each other. If you are playing all singletons and you scry something to the bottom and still draw it then that would prove there is a scry bug.

  • @adriendelplace8755
    @adriendelplace8755 Рік тому

    First episode with a sponsor. We can see the channel growing :). I love rewatching all the episodes for that.

  • @matheusbc9622
    @matheusbc9622 7 років тому +17

    seth you CAN untap untapped permanents,

  • @georgeducharme2819
    @georgeducharme2819 7 років тому

    Thank you so much for pronouncing Garruk correctly. I wasn't gonna be able to handle multiple games of someone saying Ga-rook over and over.

  • @SomeFreakingCactus
    @SomeFreakingCactus 7 років тому +9

    19:20 *insert To Be Continued meme*

  • @jerzane5617
    @jerzane5617 7 років тому +19

    Holy Thoughtseizes, Goldfish!

  • @coreysierchio4650
    @coreysierchio4650 7 років тому

    Garruk was my first planeswalker (and you NEVER forget your first.) Good job making him rock out loud. Although, "We just go way over the top of creature decks" seemed to have forgotten your battle against elves. Keep up the good stuff, Merry Christmas!

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  7 років тому +1

      I think of that build of Elves as more of a combo deck personally.

  • @Cspence1010
    @Cspence1010 7 років тому

    Love this style of deck. Lot of fun to watch

  • @stevenrankin6672
    @stevenrankin6672 7 років тому

    Seth thanks for the content. Tribal planeswalker decks are awesome!

  • @meatrace
    @meatrace 7 років тому

    So I bought a random pack of Iconic Masters the other day and got Genesis Wave, and was mulling over ways to abuse it in modern. Then this shows up in my feed. Made my day!

  • @Strolpol
    @Strolpol 7 років тому +2

    Cool deck, though I wonder if it might be better to have Tooth and Nail as a sideboard transformation plan. You've already got 90% of that deck there.

  • @Blacturne859
    @Blacturne859 7 років тому

    This episode makes me happy :D Garruk is my boi! Thumbs up!

  • @Darkneszora
    @Darkneszora 7 років тому +2

    That last game was the nuts!

  • @farman2table
    @farman2table 3 роки тому

    What are the chances of you revisiting this now that there's more Garruks?

  • @PalPlays
    @PalPlays 7 років тому

    21:05 SETH! After games where you run into the "Scry bug", draw out your deck and see if there's one on the bottom!

  • @curtislinville858
    @curtislinville858 7 років тому +2

    I think you should use mis matched cards in modo that way if you scry to the bottom and get the same print card you know its a bug! If you go through the game without shuffling you can draw the next card until you get to the bottom to see if its really there.

  • @Ethan-ub9qh
    @Ethan-ub9qh 7 років тому

    Can someone explain not fighting Tarmogoyf with Garruk at 14:29?

  • @nickzane8243
    @nickzane8243 7 років тому

    built a garruk deck. not quite this build but it works very well. difference is I went for Genesis hydra's over genesis wave. gives it an edge against counter spell decks. on there own though garruk can taken over a game. bigger problem is flying, IE lingering souls tokens. it feels bad playing spells that kill flyers only, but it works against flying tokens that evade garruks tokens. but supporting garruk with pyroclasm does remedy bazar situations that garruks are slow for, or can't handle.

  • @chris72397
    @chris72397 7 років тому

    32:15 Why is Seth on the draw rather than on the play?

  • @frisbeedude1121
    @frisbeedude1121 6 років тому

    "We have a sad Nykthos" made me laugh so hard hahaha

  • @luliby2309
    @luliby2309 7 років тому +2

    That Progenitus plan has me thinking...you should do a deck with the main plan being to get out a Progenitus.
    If you haven't, of course.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  7 років тому +4

      We probably should do a Progenitus deck at some point. Good idea!

    • @luliby2309
      @luliby2309 7 років тому

      Sweet. It should be awesome!

    • @TheMattmatic
      @TheMattmatic 7 років тому +1

      Maybe then we'll finally find out what Progenitus does with the Relic of Progenitus.

  • @SheonEver
    @SheonEver 7 років тому +3

    The first half was spice city. :)

  • @youtubenoobdude5724
    @youtubenoobdude5724 7 років тому +1

    A "Punt!" has been initiated. Should have had more Sound the Call in deck.

  • @skeetadel
    @skeetadel 7 років тому

    I don’t know, you think you could put together a Tron walker deck Seth?

  • @tannerroberts1073
    @tannerroberts1073 7 років тому +3

    Uh.. What happen to game 2 vs dredge? You skipped straight to game 3

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  7 років тому +2

      We won, but it was really long and boring (basically, we played a sideboard Scavenging Ooze and slowly beat them down while leaving up mana so they couldn't do much with thier graveyard).

  • @RoxyGotMoxy.
    @RoxyGotMoxy. 7 років тому +1

    That bug deaths shadow list was brutal. Anyone know how it compares to the jund and Grixis variants?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  7 років тому +2

      I've just recently started seeing BUG pop up. It seems pretty good to me.

    • @RoxyGotMoxy.
      @RoxyGotMoxy. 7 років тому

      MTGGoldfish firstly thanks for the reply Seth, LOVE the channel, secondly Yeah, I've been thinking about it since i posted my comment and between the golgari grave digging goodness, the discard, access to abrupt decay, nature's claim out of the board, the best removal, counterspells, and powerful cheap creatures including 'goyf, it's hard to see why it hasn't shown up sooner tbh lol.

  • @Brodysseous
    @Brodysseous 7 років тому

    i don't have MTGO yet, but is there a way to test a desk with all scry-lands and some cards with masterpiece alters as one ofs (one regular and one alter in are the only copies in the deck)? if you scry a masterpiece and still get the masterpiece you would know there is a bug.

  • @EldritchSquiggle
    @EldritchSquiggle 7 років тому

    Why no surgical extraction sideboarded in against Waste Not?

  • @SomeFreakingCactus
    @SomeFreakingCactus 7 років тому

    What if you were to play 2cmc land untappers to untap Nyxthos?

  • @YouWillNeverKnowMan
    @YouWillNeverKnowMan 6 років тому

    20:56 For the record, it is NOT theoretically possible that 50% of the times you have two The Chain Veil stacked on top of each others. ;)

  • @MasterVash
    @MasterVash 7 років тому

    When you went Turn 1 Forest, Utopia Sprawl while you had a Birds in your hand, the optimal play was to drop Birds turn 1. Turn 2 you could tap the Birds to play Sprawl, which would get you 3 mana on turn 2 just like Sprawl first would, only this way you have a Birds out as well. Unless you were really, really worried about Birds eating a removal spell on turn 1, you should've played it first.

  • @joshuamiller6396
    @joshuamiller6396 7 років тому +4

    Any reason not to run boseiju?

    • @zackestin1368
      @zackestin1368 7 років тому

      It does run one

    • @joshuamiller6396
      @joshuamiller6396 7 років тому

      Zack Estin In the board. If you're so dependant on resolving Genesis wave I feel like it should be mained.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  7 років тому +1

      We have one in the sideboard. Could play it main, but it's clunky sometimes with cards like Wistful Selkie.

    • @TheRealWormbo
      @TheRealWormbo 7 років тому +1

      Why didn't you board it in for the match against the Subborn Denials and Remands, like you suggested in the deck tech?

  • @violentphlegms1809
    @violentphlegms1809 7 років тому

    Any way you could add Panharmonicon in this bad boy?

  • @vbkllr
    @vbkllr 7 років тому

    Against Dredge, why did you play second on game 2?

  • @WildcardZwei
    @WildcardZwei 7 років тому

    Imagine if you ramped with this deck in tandem with the helix pinnacle. That would've been wild.

  • @newhampshirenate
    @newhampshirenate 7 років тому

    IF YOU INSIST ON SCREAMING PLEASE GET VOLUME COMPRESSION SOFTWARE FOR YOUR MICROPHONE! THANK YOU!

  • @skeetadel
    @skeetadel 7 років тому

    How do I find the polls to vote?

  • @hyperviper90
    @hyperviper90 7 років тому

    The Progenitus in the sidebar just completely disappears under its own mana symbols.

  • @leegammon1267
    @leegammon1267 7 років тому

    What do you think of changing caller of beasts for the three drop Nissa? She a bit cheaper, makes tokens and can pump your team.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  7 років тому +1

      Nissa could be good, but it works against the Garruk flavor.

  • @danielstormbornii
    @danielstormbornii 7 років тому

    "We make a beast, WE MAKE A BEAST."

  • @zackestin1368
    @zackestin1368 7 років тому

    It’d be cool to see the temur veil combo, ral zarek with nissa world waker going infinite with chain veil is fun.

  • @Rococorico
    @Rococorico 7 років тому

    About the "scry to the bottom, draw the same next or the following draw" thing, it totally happens all the time when I'm goldfishing. It's a bug in the Universe, not MTGO.

  • @xavisimon3095
    @xavisimon3095 7 років тому

    Dredge and infect are the mains reasons why I don’t complain abut storm.

  • @cassie7611
    @cassie7611 6 років тому

    What is the point of Progenitus?

  • @RomeroGrinerdam
    @RomeroGrinerdam 7 років тому

    Maybe you could replace the progenitus, the caller of beasts and the predator for 3 mana Nissas, wich are good making tokens and pumping.

    • @RomeroGrinerdam
      @RomeroGrinerdam 7 років тому

      By the way. I am the "abzan" guy that played against you when you tried that death cloud/dark petition deck. This series are so much fun. Keep going with new ideas.

  • @petersmythe6484
    @petersmythe6484 7 років тому

    I am looking forward to a "Spicy" very snow deck.
    I hope that option wins.

  • @Jaamie1111
    @Jaamie1111 7 років тому

    There is definitely a scry bug! I top a esper charm, only 1 in the deck and on my draw a island

  • @robotactics6635
    @robotactics6635 7 років тому +2

    1:00 Hehe... listen to the excitement of Seth when he thinks he might be able to actually "play some magic." HAHAHA!!!! its sad that this how the state of Modern has become. Keep fighting the fight Seth, beat those odds!

  • @LeviathanStorm38
    @LeviathanStorm38 7 років тому

    That first match is precisely why i hate death shadow decks. Granted, it's not a problem exclusive to DS decks, but all the big delve creatures give you access to one of the most efficient counterspells in the format when they're allowed to stay on board.

  • @MidgarMerc
    @MidgarMerc 7 років тому

    Nice to see someone FINALLY not scoop to a crazy combo. Is -70 the record on this channel for a non-scoop life total?

    • @TheMattmatic
      @TheMattmatic 7 років тому

      It might be. The first game of Legacy Kobolds was very sad, when opponent scooped before Seth could attack for 579 damage on turn 1 on the play. That would be a hard one to beat.

  • @epothos1
    @epothos1 7 років тому

    Karn ajani(RW) teferi(Planeswalker) tezzeret, the seeker chain vail mana rocks

  • @kirbynator
    @kirbynator 7 років тому

    Wouldnt Oath of Nissa would be great here also?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  7 років тому

      I think it would be fine, but i'm not 100% sure it's needed.

  • @patrickmcguinness109
    @patrickmcguinness109 7 років тому

    I was waiting for the holy day or settle the wreckage in the last one

  • @anosmianAcrimony
    @anosmianAcrimony 7 років тому

    Gotta love putting your opponent to -70 with a finite combo.

  • @paolomigliorati6141
    @paolomigliorati6141 7 років тому

    This deck reminds me of my firsr build for Atraxa: everybody killing anything but garruk and die to overrun

  • @mcNopeFace
    @mcNopeFace 7 років тому +14

    i dont see the point in progenitus and bad garruk. still struggles with ensnaring bridge and is easily avoidable. for a single stomping ground you could play 2 cut/ribbons, which gets around player hexproof, discard, worship, fog, ensnaring bridge. that all on its own. and maybe forces some graveyard hate from the opponent while still being a decent removal spell.

    • @valdemarjrgensen8072
      @valdemarjrgensen8072 7 років тому +8

      It's a garruk tribal against the odds deck?

    • @the_snakelicious
      @the_snakelicious 7 років тому +1

      Planeswalker tribal decks don't have to play bad planeswalkers, there are plenty of good ones to play instead.

    • @baileyrose6459
      @baileyrose6459 7 років тому +1

      Felipe Rodrigues did you watch the Liliana one? He plays at least one of each copy.

    • @jacobdachauer4377
      @jacobdachauer4377 7 років тому

      by the thought of not playing a card because of 1 card in the format (ensnaring bridge)....why would you ever play a non basic land?? blood moon is out there....I am not saying that progenitus is good here, but I am not a fan of saying you can't play a card because another card is in the format.

    • @mcNopeFace
      @mcNopeFace 7 років тому

      you compare bloodmoon (this deck gets easily around it) with discard? like the black staple (thoughtsieze and inquisition) ? And this time, it is about having different ways to win, other than attacking (and castable cards).
      Garruk sure, but a card with X in its mana costs not in a devotion deck ? And to videos, there is the video about on theme cards and just good cards (was about Commander decks).
      What a weird discussion, i just like brewing around, not having a clash of unrelated opinions.

  • @anonzillaking
    @anonzillaking 7 років тому

    You messed up the chain veil some of the gurruks could have ticked up more

  • @ComradeArthur
    @ComradeArthur 7 років тому

    Interesting how often a fog effect would wreck you.

  • @richardadams7667
    @richardadams7667 7 років тому

    So I think there were a couple moment when you're plays were a little disorganised. Like turn one sprawl or birds... It HAS to be turn one bird, so that next turn you can sprawl a forest and have three mana.

    • @the_snakelicious
      @the_snakelicious 7 років тому

      Fatal Push is one of the most played cards in Modern though, if the opponent kills the bird you only get 2 mana on turn 2 and it lets the opponent use up their mana optimally.

    • @richardadams7667
      @richardadams7667 7 років тому

      Felipe Rodrigues I see your point but utopia sprawl does to ghost quarter, another highly played card. I mentioned the above because sequencing wise garruk would be in play ALOT earlier. Also playing a Selky turn three when you have a five drop garruk a bird and a land in hand seems weak too. Just play bird and garruk turn four.

    • @the_snakelicious
      @the_snakelicious 7 років тому

      Ghost Quarter isn't nearly as played as 1 mana removal though, Birds also dies to Bolt and a number of other things. Another reason to play Utopia first is to protect it against turn 1 discard, it's much better to have Utopia in play than a Bird that can be killed at any moment, because the enchantment is much harder to deal with and it works better with a topdecked Arbor Elf.

  • @m1n1fan
    @m1n1fan 7 років тому

    Seth, the very last game should've gone for Primal Command shuffle graveyard + put land on top to reach flawless victory

  • @chriscunningham6401
    @chriscunningham6401 4 роки тому

    Why is Progenitus even in there?

  • @DonovanPresents
    @DonovanPresents 7 років тому

    That first match, that opponent was being too control too early in the beginning

  • @Drakksy
    @Drakksy 7 років тому

    There's a Reddit article where a guy watching a bunch of videos and noted about 33% of scry bottoms still being on top in like 200 games. Definitely a big but hard to prove in testing due to circumstances needed for the code to show the bug. Some believe that the system thinks the card is both on top and bottom, but one streamer drew the entire deck after that happened and had no extras and the one on the bottom. So it's possible that mtgo doesn't actually know the library order unless specified and randomizes each draw, which is BS

    • @coreysierchio4650
      @coreysierchio4650 7 років тому

      To quote the Professor, "Paper Magic is better than On-line Magic. On-Line Magic is better than no Magic."

  • @eltac1060
    @eltac1060 7 років тому

    Deflecting palm against you should be the nutzz to cast

  • @aven78
    @aven78 7 років тому

    Seems like this deck could have used 2-3 Beat Withins rather than Progenitus and other cards like that he kept removing.

  • @Commanderkittenface
    @Commanderkittenface 7 років тому

    NICE FAIR FUN DECK

  • @TheWinterPhoenix
    @TheWinterPhoenix 7 років тому

    During the last game You could have shuffled in your graveyard and then Genesis wave again for the whole deck. Didn't need to but it would be funny.

  • @rapier1986
    @rapier1986 7 років тому

    The deck would be a lot cheaper if all the fetches were foothills (verdants not needed no basic swamps)

  • @MultiTaz333
    @MultiTaz333 7 років тому

    That's the combo

  • @PalPlays
    @PalPlays 7 років тому

    Guys! Vote for Beard Tribal! Do the right thing!

  • @SylveonSimp
    @SylveonSimp 7 років тому

    I liked the part the most where he said "Garruk".

  • @valeriohorseman
    @valeriohorseman 7 років тому

    7th's basic lands! 😍

  • @ViolenceisJustice
    @ViolenceisJustice 7 років тому +12

    20 lands seems pretty greedy of a manabase

    • @Hunkn0w
      @Hunkn0w 7 років тому +22

      20 lands + 8 mana dorks + 4 utopia sprawls... that's 32 mana sources!

    • @justinkp
      @justinkp 7 років тому +1

      But you need 1 of the 20 to use the other 12. I think said you should count things like birds as half a land or something, if so 26 sources seems fine.

    • @Hunkn0w
      @Hunkn0w 7 років тому +1

      Justin yeah, birds and elfs can be pushed and sprawls can be negated/destroyed (ghost quarter and stuff), still, as you said, if they are counted as half sources, the mana source count is pretty high.

    • @Allistar123
      @Allistar123 7 років тому

      he was mana screwed a lot in these games so yeah.

  • @juliuscaesar709
    @juliuscaesar709 7 років тому

    "put target creature on top of its opponent's deck" sounds like an unstable card

  • @tomjackal5708
    @tomjackal5708 7 років тому

    You always do everything in the default teeny tiny windows where we can't even read the cards, and half the time can't see which thing you select until the effect happens, and now you managed to only click on like 70% of them

  • @darmy1danny
    @darmy1danny 7 років тому

    I'm pretty new to mtg, especially online games. Why does everyone play death shadow so much? I mean wouldn't they want to play something unique and different then just the same thing over and over again? Just seems boring to me but idk the rewards of winning so that may be the reason why.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  7 років тому +7

      Part of what makes Magic so great is everyone had different goals and ideas about playing the game. I like to play fun, different decks, and while I like winning, that's not my priority. Other people would rather get as good as possible with the best deck possible to win as much as possible.
      Neither is better than the other, just different ways of going about the game.

    • @darmy1danny
      @darmy1danny 7 років тому

      MTGGoldfish thanks for responding Seth! Yeah that makes sense, I just feel bad for you sometimes having to play against the same deck over and over again. But it sure seems like you're enjoying it still.
      Also I loved this brew btw, keep it up!

  • @snowstalker913
    @snowstalker913 7 років тому

    I want reindeer tribal so bad XD

  • @evandill
    @evandill 7 років тому

    P O W E R F U L M A G I C

  • @tomjackal5708
    @tomjackal5708 7 років тому

    shoutouts to profboom for going to -70

  • @grim3646
    @grim3646 7 років тому +1

    Hey Seth, gotta deck to show you that you might like!
    My own personal homebrew, it's a Biovisionary combo deck. Kind of inspired by the CoCo decks like Kitchen Finks, but the win conditions are, of course, Biovisionary and Geist of Saint Traft (might change to Mirran Crusader due to certain card synergies)
    Here's my decklist :P tappedout.net/mtg-decks/bioshock-combo/

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  7 років тому

      Looks sweet!

    • @grim3646
      @grim3646 7 років тому

      MTGGoldfish yeah, gonna be hard but, I’m going to make this deck as competitive as possible lol

  • @PalPlays
    @PalPlays 7 років тому

    It's not "BUG Death's Shadow," it's Sultai.

  • @meatrace
    @meatrace 7 років тому

    It's not quite as good as the whale parade deck but it seems like the same principle.

  • @sofer2230
    @sofer2230 7 років тому

    No'-As-Big-As-Medium-Garruk-But-Bigger-Than-Wee-Garruk-Garruk

  • @pramukhnaduthota6622
    @pramukhnaduthota6622 7 років тому

    Am I wrong in feeling like this is a more inconsistent elves?

    • @TheMattmatic
      @TheMattmatic 7 років тому

      Also elves is boring, while this is super spicy.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  7 років тому +5

      I think you're most likely to win a tournament with Elves, but more likely to card a lot of Garruks with this deck.

    • @TheMattmatic
      @TheMattmatic 7 років тому

      @mtggoldfish It's deck analysis like that that makes you a pro, and us just humble viewers.

  • @seanwood2833
    @seanwood2833 7 років тому

    Cool

  • @ODIRGO
    @ODIRGO 7 років тому

    you got mana screwed in almost everygame

  • @chaseroberts3596
    @chaseroberts3596 7 років тому

    Dude, that non stop removal and hand destruction deck is super annoying.

  • @gregoryrasputin2954
    @gregoryrasputin2954 7 років тому

    You scooped too early match 1 v elves

    • @zackestin1368
      @zackestin1368 7 років тому

      He was dead next turn

    • @zackestin1368
      @zackestin1368 7 років тому

      And has zero boardwipes to draw and no way to combo

  • @viseman9253
    @viseman9253 7 років тому

    the voice dear god the voice

  • @kennethritacco6959
    @kennethritacco6959 7 років тому

    What is your obsession with Arbor Elf and Utopia Sprawl...just...stop. it's too fragile and isn't going to work that often