The meetings with the Muggle Prime Minister and Fudge were the perfect (and really funny) start for HP & the Half-Blood Prince, so cutting them from the film felt really lame. (But to be honest, the movie also cut much more important stuff, so...)
I thought that it was the worst movie in terms of book-movie accuracy. But because Dumbledore died in it, everyone loved it for the emotional impact 🤷♂️.
@@Lethal_Giggles Yeah, as a rule of thumb for me the more I liked the book the less I liked the movie and vice versa. (Only with the Prisoner of Azkaban I loved both equally.) Edit: And for the point of reference I read the books and saw the movies just a couple of years ago at the age of 35, so they got little to no nostalgia value for me. I vastly preferred the books.
@@Vohaul86 I could go either way. The books will always be top tier. I only liked the 4th movie because of the world building, but they skipped over too many things
Pennelope Clearwater was in the movies, briefly, as there is a scene in the Chamber of Secrets, I believe, where Nearly Headless Nick passes Percy and a girl and says, "Hello there Percy, miss Clearwater." which tipping his head to them. So technically, she is in the movie.
Regulus Black did not "give his life to destroy the Horcrux." He did die in his attempt to take it, after drinking the potion to spare Kreacher the horror of drinking it again, but the two were ultimately unsuccessful at destroying it. I think it was also nearly criminal to the story to omit Winky, because her character explained many things. Hokey should have been included, also, for the story of the locket and the cup.
@@Adthereccomendationsguy Hokey was the house-elf belonging to Hepzibah Smith, the descendant of Helga Hufflepuff, owner of Slytherin's locket and Hufflepuff's cup. She made the mistake of showing them to Tom Riddle, who murdered her, stole the locket and cup, and framed Hokey for the crime.
While Viktor Krum is present, I think they should have included him in the wedding scene in DH. Him telling Harry about Grindelwald would have been a good connection to the Magical Beasts series and to Dumbledore's story.
for peeves it actually was mentioned during a behind the scenes video where during the production of the sorcerer's stone, iirc when peeves was around and being himself so to speak, the kids portraying the students wouldn't stop laughing and so the director got fed up with it and cut the character out
Yeah, the whole House Elf part of the Wizarding World of Harry Potter was greatly missed. It also showed how soft & hard Hermoine can get when shes deeply involved in something. I personally would've liked to hae seen more of Voldemorts scenes where he acquires the objects for his Horcruxes. If they re-boot the franchise (give it another ten years), it'll have to be in a long format to give the story more time to tell itself fully.
A series where they could have each season cover a book. But having multiple episodes over 40 mins long per season. Really could be special if the right actors and director are selected. And probably more important, a competent and passionate screenwriter
@@nicothecat1648 It's gonna be hard seeing different actors since some of the originals have long since passed. I'm keeping an open mind about it though
I don’t believe Sir Cudodgeon appeared In The films but there was one shot of a knight in a painting in the Prisoner of Azkaban that could have been him
I would have loved to see Olivia Colman as Andromeda in the original series. Augusta Longbottom - Dame Judy Dench or even the legendary Diana Rigg (for the original series) Prof Bins- 100% Rowan Atkinson's role. Hepsuba Smith could have been played by Brenda Blethyn. I'd love for them to have been able to squeeze in Dame Helen Mirren somewhere
Pretty sure Regulus Black never made a physical appearance in the book either. Only acknowledgements pertaining to the family tree and the locket. No clue why Phineas Nigelus Black was featured in the thumbnail. He got the same coverage in both book and movie, as a painting in the Headmaster's office who went for help when Arthur Weasley got attacked. I don't recall seeing him mentioned in the video, unless I missed it, which makes the thumbnail even more baffling.
he's mentioned in the video. to which i disagree. phineas's main roles in the books that really effected the story is when he tells sirius about arthur weasley's attack by the snake in order of the phoenix, then again in deathly hallows telling not only harry, ron, and hermione about dumbledore using the sword to break the ring, but telling snape about where they are in the forest of dean so that he could send the patronus to lure harry to the pool where the sword lay waiting, and of course re forging the bond between harry and ron
@@Leonardo-cw1dd - Either way, he wasn't omitted from the films, even if they did shrink his role. He still appeared in the painting during the scene in Dumbledore's office after Harry's vision of Arthur and Dumbledore told him to go to Grimauld Place and alert the Order. The title says characters who never made it into the movies, but Phineas did.
Technically Charlie was in the movie, but only in the photo of the Weasley family on holiday in Egypt in PoA. The same goes for Frank and Alice Longbottom. They were in a photo of the Order of the Phoenix.
Peeves, Winky, and Ludo Bagman were the 3 that really should have been included. Peeves and Winky would have added quite a bit to the budget so i see to some degree why they were cut.
I'm not sure how Regulus Black could have appeared in the films, given that he has long since died before we ever hear about him in the books; and as far as I can remember we don't see him in any flashbacks either 🤷🏽♂️
He could have appeared in a flashback as Kreacher told his story of delivering the locket to the cave with Voldemort, then returning to the cave with Regulus to steal the locket. Of a poignant note, Regulus drank the potion himself, as Dumbledore did for Harry, to spare Kreacher the horror of drinking it again.
@@arinerm1331 Well, that's true, though it might be a bit of a stretch. For me, the unfilmed characters I'd most like to see in the TV adaptations are Ludo Bagman (his dodgy dealings with Fred & George show a different side of the twins); Winky (a pretty crucial character really); Neville's grandmother and his parents; and the Gaunts, in the pensieve memory Dumbledore shows Harry. That was a *great* scene.
i think regulus black was better off left out of the movies apart from the few mentions here and there as apart from first hearing of him in the order of the phoenix, we dont hear more about how he died until book 7. book 6 only mentioned a guess by lupin about how long he lasted before being killed. book 7 explained it via kreacher. apart from that, we dont hear anything more about regulus. he never appeared as a memory at all, the only times mentioned in the deathly hallows book of potentially seeing his character were the black family portrait (technically in order of the phoenix. next one is deathly hallows) and then again in a picture of the slytherin quidditch team while harry was searching the room. considering charlie had less screen time is really unfair and this may sound contradictory of me to say this, charlie should have gotten more screen time, regulus im sorry to say is better off being merely mentioned. bill deserved to appear in the series in the goblet of fire instead of first appearing in deathly hallows
By your rules, you should have omitted Penelope Clearwater from this list. Very early in the second film, Nearly Headless Nick says hello to Percy and "Miss Clearwater". A very brief appearance, and only from the back, but that's as much as some others that were omitted.
The same goes for Charlie Weasley who appeared on the image of the newspaper article in the third film. Also Piers Polkis stood in the background of the fifth film when Dudley tried to bully Harry and had his gang with him.
I agree with almost all of these omissions from the films, as in they should have been left out. The characters who absolutely should have been included who weren’t are Regulus Black and the Gaunts. We also should have had apparition lessons, but it could have been any of the professors. There didn’t need to be a new instructor. Charlie Weasley would have been good to include at some point, but he’s barely in the books as it is. Peeves would have been a pointless comic relief character, which usually undermines a movie more than it adds to it. I guess we’d have to see the performance and how well the writers incorporated him into the plot.
One thing I can say about HP is that every book was adapted into a movie GoT got their show and LotR and TH got all of their movies as well Others that got their story adapted into movies can’t be said the same
Those were some of the only successful fantasy book to film adaptations. And even then GoT went downhill half way through. Only Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings managed to consistently make good movies that were decent adaptations of their respective book series, which is a shame in some ways, but these are equally some of the best series so you can’t complain too much.
I’m a huge fan of the books but stopped watching the movies around the third. Some of these characters I could see why they be cut but how can you cut the Guants? Or any of the longbottoms?
i can kind of see your point on the Gaunts but for ...some reason i remember a Neville Longbottom being mentioned in the movies .... 🤔🤔 been a while since i've seen them ...
“The definitive list of characters that aren’t shown AT ALL” “If they were shown in ANY capacity, they were omitted from this list.” Uses the Photo of Neville’s parents from the film while saying they were not shown at all in the film. I’m confused. Before anyone says anything, I am aware of the left out scenes with them, but he said, it was a list of those not shown at all, and any shown in any form were omitted. Yet he features the photo showing them lol.
Well - he's annoying in the books too so it fits, lol. I think that's the point though, he's obnoxious and always there doing something you don't want him to be doing.
I remember reading somewhere that Charlie Weasley asexual or gay, as fans speculated why Charlie seemed to not have girlfriends compared to his other brothers Fred, George and Ron for example.
Do you guys think the HBO reboot will include more characters and scenes that didn’t make it in the movie? Possibly even a more faithful adaptation maybe? Just curious.
Video idea: How did Hermione, in the first film, know so much about magic and wizard folklore and history (knew spells perfectly and knew who many people were in the wizarding world, including harry), before having even gone through her first year at hogwarts?
Please please please....when you upload to Spotify, please remove the ads. I catch up when I can and love your voice to fall asleep to at times, then an ad comes on. Please!
I just realized something that might not be on this list. It's heavily implied that Bertha Jorkins fetus became the Voldemort baby. ... Voldemort is now Bertha Jorkin's son. I don't think I realized that before, I was just so blinded by disgust.
It was nice seeing Peeves in Hogwarts Legacy. I mean, he's still a dick, but cool nonetheless. Honestly, Hogwarts Legacy was, in my opinion, much better than any of Rowling's actual projects. I'd love to see you cover topics from the game.
Here’s a list of characters that didn’t make it: yes, it’s mostly hugflepuffs that were actually significant to the plot. Honestly tho, to this day the things that bug me the most is how they handled the Neville storyline because even if the films do satisfying job his whole story is layers and layers on the books. That and I don’t know what people are supposed to think about snape’s backstory for real when all we have is flashes of the flashbacks and not a single explanation of the prince title. (Also peeves not being there and us not having Minerva tell him how to rightly destroy the school kinda hurts honestly). But my biggest pet peeves are the Neville/Luna thing which is explained by the author as “a relationship that would kill Neville with fear” and just that the bad guys don’t die simple human deaths like in the books. Voldemort and Bellatrix exploding is a choice but it’s the wrong one. Haha
What about my beloved Sirius Black’s Mother and Father? They were a right piece of work, I tell you! Always hating their son, my beloved Sirius! But, I don’t remember seeing them in the Movies.
He was definitely in the Half-Blood Prince. You don't remember him trying to get on the quidditch team and get with Hermione? He ate the "dragon balls" and puked on Snape's shoes?
:) i love rowan but im curious bins is the in essence an immensely boring and subdued character not sure what about rowans best characters suggest him as the actor for this now peeves i could understand but i think he would be prevented from his best work by the nature of bins as a character
@@Chaosfox04 ok this adds some credence to what your saying just seemed like a wierd to me :) although im one to talk i have often though the world would be alot better if every Man spoke either as david attenbourough, morgan freeman, james earl jr or some comibination of thse
We see Neville’s parents in the photo of the first Order of the Phoenix. There’s a particular scene in the fifth movie where Neville’s staring at it in the Room of Requirement, and then Harry joins him and they swear to do their parents proud (or avenge them, something along those lines).
It was actually a really moving scene imo but they could have showed the St. Mungo's scene to really show how tragic their fate really was. The gum wrapper would have been a great scene too.
Winky was the most important omission...imo. Her presence explained the whole subplot behind Barty Crouch. My daughter's friend attended the movies with us, but hadn't read the books & we spent some time explaining his importance. The best thing about that was she read the books as a result.
GOF is the worst film, but I don’t think Winky’s inclusion really would have improved anything. Plus, kids and parents don’t want to see an alcoholic house elf.
What about yhe children that Tom Riddle terrified in the cave? They were in the book, and not the movie. And the muggle thst was tortured by the death eaters at the World Quidditch Cup?
Phineas Black did more than that he told Snape where Harry and Hermione were and honestly the biggest plot whole of the movies like how did Snape find them in the movies without the help of blacks portrait
I think if they showed Peeves they would’ve had to explain him more which would’ve given him far too much screen time. It wouldn’t have matched the pacing of the movies. I also think that if he had that much attention it would’ve turned some people off especially in the early days. Don’t get me wrong! I like Peeves, he’s just kind of a bad “person.” He’s fun and all but WE see him almost kill several people with pranks. I can’t imagine chandeliers falling from high ceilings are good for your health.
I feel like they could have included Peeves by mentioning him in a sense of "Peeves did it again". I just love how he pays his respects to Weasley twins and salutes them during their legendary exit and would have loved to see this in the movie 🫠
MORE LONG VIDEOS: ua-cam.com/play/PLB5djWCQq2_e0UCOmVbhRP8HkxetpzXUV.html
The meetings with the Muggle Prime Minister and Fudge were the perfect (and really funny) start for HP & the Half-Blood Prince, so cutting them from the film felt really lame. (But to be honest, the movie also cut much more important stuff, so...)
You mean the meeting between John Major and Cornelius Fudge
Yeah, but that cut allowed for more Won-won subplot. Definately a win.
I thought that it was the worst movie in terms of book-movie accuracy. But because Dumbledore died in it, everyone loved it for the emotional impact 🤷♂️.
@@Lethal_Giggles Yeah, as a rule of thumb for me the more I liked the book the less I liked the movie and vice versa. (Only with the Prisoner of Azkaban I loved both equally.)
Edit: And for the point of reference I read the books and saw the movies just a couple of years ago at the age of 35, so they got little to no nostalgia value for me. I vastly preferred the books.
@@Vohaul86 I could go either way. The books will always be top tier. I only liked the 4th movie because of the world building, but they skipped over too many things
Pennelope Clearwater was in the movies, briefly, as there is a scene in the Chamber of Secrets, I believe, where Nearly Headless Nick passes Percy and a girl and says, "Hello there Percy, miss Clearwater." which tipping his head to them. So technically, she is in the movie.
Regulus Black did not "give his life to destroy the Horcrux." He did die in his attempt to take it, after drinking the potion to spare Kreacher the horror of drinking it again, but the two were ultimately unsuccessful at destroying it.
I think it was also nearly criminal to the story to omit Winky, because her character explained many things. Hokey should have been included, also, for the story of the locket and the cup.
also he made as much of an appearance in movies as in books. he was long dead before the series. simply a memory
Who was hokey
@@Adthereccomendationsguy House-elf to Hepzibah Smith, descendant of Helga Hufflepuff!!!
@@Adthereccomendationsguy Hokey was the house-elf belonging to Hepzibah Smith, the descendant of Helga Hufflepuff, owner of Slytherin's locket and Hufflepuff's cup. She made the mistake of showing them to Tom Riddle, who murdered her, stole the locket and cup, and framed Hokey for the crime.
@@alibabapirce9782yeah, I'm not really sure how he could've been included, other than giving a better explanation of R.A.B and the locket
I think the introduction of Mrs. Figg as Harry's babysitter would have enhanced the reveal in Order of the Phoenix.
I was so disappointed when the Hogwarts House Elves didn't appear in battle during the final movie.
While Viktor Krum is present, I think they should have included him in the wedding scene in DH. Him telling Harry about Grindelwald would have been a good connection to the Magical Beasts series and to Dumbledore's story.
Yet another way in which they fumbled that movie; although I doubt the Fantastic Beasts movies were even a concept yet when DHp1 was being made.
Madame Bones: A Witch so formidable, Tom came for her life himself.
Susan would be proud 😂
Penelope Clearwater was shown once in passing. Nearly Headless Nick said hello to her and Percy in the hallway once.
for peeves it actually was mentioned during a behind the scenes video where during the production of the sorcerer's stone, iirc when peeves was around and being himself so to speak, the kids portraying the students wouldn't stop laughing and so the director got fed up with it and cut the character out
My understanding was that Rik's antics led to filming overrunning, leading to delays in getting the film completed.
@@RogbodgeVideo could be true as well
What about Bob Ogden? He was the ministry worker who appears in the first memory with the Gaunts. I don't believe he appeared in the HBP or DH movies.
Yeah, the whole House Elf part of the Wizarding World of Harry Potter was greatly missed. It also showed how soft & hard Hermoine can get when shes deeply involved in something.
I personally would've liked to hae seen more of Voldemorts scenes where he acquires the objects for his Horcruxes.
If they re-boot the franchise (give it another ten years), it'll have to be in a long format to give the story more time to tell itself fully.
You don't know? The HBO Max Re-boot was announced back in April...
No, no, I know about that. I'm just dismissing it xD@@bstybyz3
Yeah, I know but I think it's too early so, that comment was coming from that perspective@@bstybyz3
Do you think every single character will appear in the HBO show? Will be interesting to see how many appear!
If it's true for the books they will all be included
@@bailatwerski2951 yes! I also really want to see more "mundane" moments like mealtimes and visits to Hagrid's hut.
I honestly want a movie that's 100% book-accurate. It would be really long but I'd still watch it.😂
I think it would work better as a tv series (or a streaming platform series)
That's the series HBO is making.
A series where they could have each season cover a book. But having multiple episodes over 40 mins long per season. Really could be special if the right actors and director are selected. And probably more important, a competent and passionate screenwriter
@@nicothecat1648 It's gonna be hard seeing different actors since some of the originals have long since passed. I'm keeping an open mind about it though
I can't wait until they do more of diagon Alley footage in the new series. Also you forgot Daedalus diggle which are semi-crucial to the plot.
Some characters you mentioned like phineas, zacharias, penelope, and piers were in the films but their roles were shortened.
Bane also.
I don’t believe Sir Cudodgeon appeared In The films but there was one shot of a knight in a painting in the Prisoner of Azkaban that could have been him
@@nager1997 Oh cool. Do you know which film?
In honour of the late Rik Mayal they should release his Peeves footage
I would have loved to see Olivia Colman as Andromeda in the original series. Augusta Longbottom - Dame Judy Dench or even the legendary Diana Rigg (for the original series) Prof Bins- 100% Rowan Atkinson's role. Hepsuba Smith could have been played by Brenda Blethyn. I'd love for them to have been able to squeeze in Dame Helen Mirren somewhere
Pretty sure Regulus Black never made a physical appearance in the book either. Only acknowledgements pertaining to the family tree and the locket. No clue why Phineas Nigelus Black was featured in the thumbnail. He got the same coverage in both book and movie, as a painting in the Headmaster's office who went for help when Arthur Weasley got attacked. I don't recall seeing him mentioned in the video, unless I missed it, which makes the thumbnail even more baffling.
he's mentioned in the video. to which i disagree. phineas's main roles in the books that really effected the story is when he tells sirius about arthur weasley's attack by the snake in order of the phoenix, then again in deathly hallows telling not only harry, ron, and hermione about dumbledore using the sword to break the ring, but telling snape about where they are in the forest of dean so that he could send the patronus to lure harry to the pool where the sword lay waiting, and of course re forging the bond between harry and ron
@@Leonardo-cw1dd - Either way, he wasn't omitted from the films, even if they did shrink his role. He still appeared in the painting during the scene in Dumbledore's office after Harry's vision of Arthur and Dumbledore told him to go to Grimauld Place and alert the Order. The title says characters who never made it into the movies, but Phineas did.
I though the thumbnail was a centaur...
Believe it or not, regions was scene in a picture slughorn had of him and his slytherin quidditch team in the half blood prince movie.
@@LEGODUDE363___ - That might have been from another recent video. This one has Phineas on the left next to the words "Removed from the movies".
Thanks for this video. It helped me remember the depth of HP's storytelling and meaning.
J.K. Rowlings did the storytelling, not HP (in case you forgot)
@@ruthanneseven sorry, I completely mismatch author and book (sarcasm)
Rik Mayell would have made a great peeves so sorry they deleted him from the film
Some of the Ravenclaw boys are missing. Anthony Goldstein and Terry Boot were both part of Dumbledore's Army.
Technically Charlie was in the movie, but only in the photo of the Weasley family on holiday in Egypt in PoA. The same goes for Frank and Alice Longbottom. They were in a photo of the Order of the Phoenix.
Peeves, Winky, and Ludo Bagman were the 3 that really should have been included. Peeves and Winky would have added quite a bit to the budget so i see to some degree why they were cut.
I was gutted that the half blood prince didn't show the other penseives with voldemorts family in them
I'm not sure how Regulus Black could have appeared in the films, given that he has long since died before we ever hear about him in the books; and as far as I can remember we don't see him in any flashbacks either 🤷🏽♂️
He could have appeared in a flashback as Kreacher told his story of delivering the locket to the cave with Voldemort, then returning to the cave with Regulus to steal the locket. Of a poignant note, Regulus drank the potion himself, as Dumbledore did for Harry, to spare Kreacher the horror of drinking it again.
He was in a picture of the Slytherin House Quidditch Team, on Slughorn’s Desk. He even mentions wishing he had Regulus & Sirius…
@@arinerm1331 Well, that's true, though it might be a bit of a stretch. For me, the unfilmed characters I'd most like to see in the TV adaptations are Ludo Bagman (his dodgy dealings with Fred & George show a different side of the twins); Winky (a pretty crucial character really); Neville's grandmother and his parents; and the Gaunts, in the pensieve memory Dumbledore shows Harry. That was a *great* scene.
Dude, what? Dead characters appear in movies and shows all the time. It’s rather common and easy to do.
Apparently Pigwidgeon was present in the background of one shot in one of the movies, but I still think he deserves a mention.
The unnamed muggle Prime Minister that met Cornelius Fudge in the first chapter of the Half Blood Prince is John Major.
i think regulus black was better off left out of the movies apart from the few mentions here and there as apart from first hearing of him in the order of the phoenix, we dont hear more about how he died until book 7. book 6 only mentioned a guess by lupin about how long he lasted before being killed. book 7 explained it via kreacher. apart from that, we dont hear anything more about regulus. he never appeared as a memory at all, the only times mentioned in the deathly hallows book of potentially seeing his character were the black family portrait (technically in order of the phoenix. next one is deathly hallows) and then again in a picture of the slytherin quidditch team while harry was searching the room.
considering charlie had less screen time is really unfair and this may sound contradictory of me to say this, charlie should have gotten more screen time, regulus im sorry to say is better off being merely mentioned. bill deserved to appear in the series in the goblet of fire instead of first appearing in deathly hallows
By your rules, you should have omitted Penelope Clearwater from this list. Very early in the second film, Nearly Headless Nick says hello to Percy and "Miss Clearwater". A very brief appearance, and only from the back, but that's as much as some others that were omitted.
The same goes for Charlie Weasley who appeared on the image of the newspaper article in the third film. Also Piers Polkis stood in the background of the fifth film when Dudley tried to bully Harry and had his gang with him.
I agree with almost all of these omissions from the films, as in they should have been left out. The characters who absolutely should have been included who weren’t are Regulus Black and the Gaunts. We also should have had apparition lessons, but it could have been any of the professors. There didn’t need to be a new instructor.
Charlie Weasley would have been good to include at some point, but he’s barely in the books as it is. Peeves would have been a pointless comic relief character, which usually undermines a movie more than it adds to it. I guess we’d have to see the performance and how well the writers incorporated him into the plot.
penelope clearwater is shown in the background with percy tho
One thing I can say about HP is that every book was adapted into a movie
GoT got their show and LotR and TH got all of their movies as well
Others that got their story adapted into movies can’t be said the same
Those were some of the only successful fantasy book to film adaptations. And even then GoT went downhill half way through. Only Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings managed to consistently make good movies that were decent adaptations of their respective book series, which is a shame in some ways, but these are equally some of the best series so you can’t complain too much.
Broderick Bode - an Unspeakable with yellowish skin. A sneaky reference to Hastur?
but Penelope was mentioned in the movies, no?
i think it was in The Chamber of Secrets
Mr. Roberts the camp site-owner!
is it me, or was the audio slightly slowed in this video?
I am enjoying the content as always!
I’m a huge fan of the books but stopped watching the movies around the third. Some of these characters I could see why they be cut but how can you cut the Guants? Or any of the longbottoms?
i can kind of see your point on the Gaunts but for ...some reason i remember a Neville Longbottom being mentioned in the movies .... 🤔🤔 been a while since i've seen them ...
@@Chrits55 I know they were mention but I’m pretty sure only in passing.
Augusta was actually in the first movie for a frame! They casted her!
❤ Awesome as always thanks! Merry Christmas and happy holidays to all those who celebrate!
“The definitive list of characters that aren’t shown AT ALL”
“If they were shown in ANY capacity, they were omitted from this list.”
Uses the Photo of Neville’s parents from the film while saying they were not shown at all in the film. I’m confused.
Before anyone says anything, I am aware of the left out scenes with them, but he said, it was a list of those not shown at all, and any shown in any form were omitted. Yet he features the photo showing them lol.
Muh-Rōpe Gaunt. You wouldn't say Pen-ă-lōpe. It's muh-Rōpe Gaunt, not "Me-ro-pay."
Penelope was technically included... but...yeah, I get your point.
I will die mad we didnt see Peeves on screen.
Wasn't Piers also in the order of the phoenix? As a background character
Peeves is annoying in the Hogwarts Legacy game
Well - he's annoying in the books too so it fits, lol. I think that's the point though, he's obnoxious and always there doing something you don't want him to be doing.
I watched it 6 hours after and love it (By the way I'm subscribed)
If I could only choose one of these they DEFINITELY shouldn’t have cut its regulus black.
I remember reading somewhere that Charlie Weasley asexual or gay, as fans speculated why Charlie seemed to not have girlfriends compared to his other brothers Fred, George and Ron for example.
Do you have a Cold? Sound a little stuffed up
No nigellus, peeves, prifessor bonns or garden gnomes? 😡
Do you guys think the HBO reboot will include more characters and scenes that didn’t make it in the movie? Possibly even a more faithful adaptation maybe? Just curious.
"IT'S MORFIN TIME!" (Someone had to say it).
Chris Columbus said that he cut peeves because they could never get the CGI quite right, and the character looked bad on film.
Some of these characters did appear. Either in passing or photos
Video idea: How did Hermione, in the first film, know so much about magic and wizard folklore and history (knew spells perfectly and knew who many people were in the wizarding world, including harry), before having even gone through her first year at hogwarts?
I believe it was mentioned to be something along the line of her getting a bunch of books prior to going to hogwarts
Yes, and she read the History of Hogwarts and the first year spellbook before she took the train.
books cuh
Books dude, it’s pretty simple
in the first book Hermione says that she had learned all the set books by heart and did background reading.
Please please please....when you upload to Spotify, please remove the ads. I catch up when I can and love your voice to fall asleep to at times, then an ad comes on.
Please!
I just realized something that might not be on this list.
It's heavily implied that Bertha Jorkins fetus became the Voldemort baby.
...
Voldemort is now Bertha Jorkin's son.
I don't think I realized that before, I was just so blinded by disgust.
Theodore Nott. I do not remember seeing him.
Ginnys personality was also let out of the movies
657. Points. Julie. 😊🎉❤gryffindor women
From the start rangers
What Harry Potter TV show???
I can visualise Hepzibah Smith as if she was in the movie
Alice and Frank Longbottom were featured MANY times in the movies
On pictures only, and barely even mentioned.
Well, Neville's parents DID appear in the films... O.O
Yeah. For a few seconds
Regulus Black WAS in the 6th Harry Potter movie. He was the Inferi that crawled out of the lake and dragged Harry under the water.
No
@@JoshuaWillis89Yes
I hate the fact that what wasn't shown in the movies was shown in the videogames and online games.
I'm 100% fine with Charlie never showing up in the movies
you sounded so sad in this one, hope you was and are ok?
Winky has fired because she let Barty Crouch jun. steal a wand and cast the Dark Mark. Please recherche better.
12,169th viewer and 683rd liker and 105th commenter!
It was nice seeing Peeves in Hogwarts Legacy. I mean, he's still a dick, but cool nonetheless.
Honestly, Hogwarts Legacy was, in my opinion, much better than any of Rowling's actual projects. I'd love to see you cover topics from the game.
60
Here’s a list of characters that didn’t make it: yes, it’s mostly hugflepuffs that were actually significant to the plot.
Honestly tho, to this day the things that bug me the most is how they handled the Neville storyline because even if the films do satisfying job his whole story is layers and layers on the books.
That and I don’t know what people are supposed to think about snape’s backstory for real when all we have is flashes of the flashbacks and not a single explanation of the prince title.
(Also peeves not being there and us not having Minerva tell him how to rightly destroy the school kinda hurts honestly).
But my biggest pet peeves are the Neville/Luna thing which is explained by the author as “a relationship that would kill Neville with fear” and just that the bad guys don’t die simple human deaths like in the books. Voldemort and Bellatrix exploding is a choice but it’s the wrong one. Haha
What about my beloved Sirius Black’s Mother and Father? They were a right piece of work, I tell you! Always hating their son, my beloved Sirius! But, I don’t remember seeing them in the Movies.
Some of these names such as Dennis creevey are a serious reach to fit more names into this video 😂
I didn’t like my own comment
I also did like your comment
Nice, I liked yours.
Why did you write it, then?
Thats original
It's okay. I did.
You didn’t add Ted tonks
Yes he did @ 5:06
Cormack McClaggan, I don't think you mentioned him (not sure the spelling is correct!)
He was in the 6th film though.
He was definitely in the Half-Blood Prince. You don't remember him trying to get on the quidditch team and get with Hermione? He ate the "dragon balls" and puked on Snape's shoes?
You forgot Snapes mother and the reason why he called himself the Half Blood Prince
Books: half blood prince.
Movie: halfling what?
We never seen the Giant Squid that lived in the lake.
They couldn't find a qualified actor to take the role.
@@olesuhr727 It's hard to find someone who can breathe underwater and has ten arms.
I think Rowan Atkinson (Mr. Bean) would have been a good casting choice for Professor Binns.
:) i love rowan but im curious bins is the in essence an immensely boring and subdued character not sure what about rowans best characters suggest him as the actor for this now peeves i could understand but i think he would be prevented from his best work by the nature of bins as a character
I was thinking of Rowan as Zazu from The Lion King when making my choice. Certainly can do a dull monotone voice.
@@Chaosfox04 ok this adds some credence to what your saying just seemed like a wierd to me :) although im one to talk i have often though the world would be alot better if every Man spoke either as david attenbourough, morgan freeman, james earl jr or some comibination of thse
You forgot the house elf Hokey of Hepzibah Smith who had a great meaning in the memories and also the second owner of Borgin and Burkes.
We see Neville’s parents in the photo of the first Order of the Phoenix. There’s a particular scene in the fifth movie where Neville’s staring at it in the Room of Requirement, and then Harry joins him and they swear to do their parents proud (or avenge them, something along those lines).
Yeah he included the picture in the video it's so weird
It was actually a really moving scene imo but they could have showed the St. Mungo's scene to really show how tragic their fate really was. The gum wrapper would have been a great scene too.
Yeah but we don't see them in the hospitol
Winky was the most important omission...imo. Her presence explained the whole subplot behind Barty Crouch.
My daughter's friend attended the movies with us, but hadn't read the books & we spent some time explaining his importance.
The best thing about that was she read the books as a result.
GOF is the worst film, but I don’t think Winky’s inclusion really would have improved anything. Plus, kids and parents don’t want to see an alcoholic house elf.
What about yhe children that Tom Riddle terrified in the cave? They were in the book, and not the movie. And the muggle thst was tortured by the death eaters at the World Quidditch Cup?
Zacharias Smith was in the Hog's Head meeting in Order of the Phoenix.
Phineas Black did more than that he told Snape where Harry and Hermione were and honestly the biggest plot whole of the movies like how did Snape find them in the movies without the help of blacks portrait
He's a 10 but his voice puts you to sleep in the first 3 minutes of the video...
I recall hearing that Chris Columbus thought the Peeves CGI wasn't very good and thus nixed the inclusion of the Hogwarts ghosts.
I like learning more about the history of Harry Potter 😊
I just wanna know why Peeves was never in any of them.. Even nearly headless Nick got in there, but not Peeves???
Is there really going to be a HP TV Show???
I think if they showed Peeves they would’ve had to explain him more which would’ve given him far too much screen time. It wouldn’t have matched the pacing of the movies. I also think that if he had that much attention it would’ve turned some people off especially in the early days. Don’t get me wrong! I like Peeves, he’s just kind of a bad “person.” He’s fun and all but WE see him almost kill several people with pranks. I can’t imagine chandeliers falling from high ceilings are good for your health.
I feel like they could have included Peeves by mentioning him in a sense of "Peeves did it again". I just love how he pays his respects to Weasley twins and salutes them during their legendary exit and would have loved to see this in the movie 🫠
Order of The Phoenix is peak Peeves🤌
3:43 : I'm glad they axed Marvolo Gaunt's character, so we could have some more Won-won subplot.
I wish the did add those characters in the film.
Winky?