Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Hearsay and Donald Trump
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 лис 2023
- In this video, Dave Sugden breaks down a recent hearsay dispute in the People v. Donald Trump trial pending in New York.
Check out @evidenceattrial's courses at www.evidenceattrial.com/onlin....
Want a topic covered? Leave a comment!
The officers signed off on everything and they knew it was all fraudulent. That is the crime.
It’s part of the due diligence of the lending institution to do their own independent valuation of any property used as collateral, you can value your house at $5 million but the bank only loans in the valuation they do so the entire argument is irrelevant.
Right, because banks always take the word of the person applying for the loan and don't have their own appraisers. I wonder what a state and county assessor does since apparently, a person also decides how much tax to pay for their properties.
So COOL!!! TY!!! I presented that at MY TRIAL for bank fraud!! Yes, indeedy!! If only you were on MY jury. What's that? Only applies to Trump? You always get dismissed of juries? 11.000 square feet is 33,000 or 30,000 and that is that? Well, my 800 was really 15,000. But you watch the Apprentice and thought you could be Trump.
@@timisaac8121 Someone's off his meds again...
Great job on your information and report it's truthful and factual for everyone to see God Bless Your Great Success 🙏♥️🙂
No it ain't hes blowing smoke up your ass.they knew it was a crime.
Excellent explanation and clarification of “using/inflating” assets, but I believe that you skip or missed the other side of the case, which he “minimized “ the same assets when taxes were applied, I’ll appreciate any “legal” explanation/clarification to that, I might use it as well and get away with it, thanks
There is a differance between saying it an putting it on legal documents.
All of the documented evidence has been ruled upon already. That ship has sailed.
I like my net worth to go up too.
But whether I do or don’t is IRRELEVANT. Exactly as Trump’s statement. Which may never have even been made. And for which there are many innocuous motives and only one conceivable - albeit very tenuous - theory that such a statement was intended to suggest fraudulent inflation of valuations.
Why not ask the onevthat affect Everybody . The taxes not si mych then so pay less.
Regardless, are there receipts (paper work, statements) that prove that the statement "see it go up", meaning property value, was what really happened before getting loans or paying taxes...???
Every year property value goes up the it goes down for tax purposes.....Suspicious, ain't it..??
Alleged.... I recommend watching the Michael Cohen testimony.
Here he said that Don did increase the value to get better loans and decreased to avoid taxes.
Except no person has control over any of those valuations. The banks do their own appraisals and the state/county assessor's office determines values for property taxes.
@@cchavezjr7 So tell me friend, why have financials at all? Oh, to protect the public. From fraudsters, like at Enron. OUCH. That has to hurt.
@@timisaac8121 Do you know what the difference between income tax and property taxes are? Financials are used to show income. Tax assessors determine property taxes. I know you really have no idea about any of this as you've shown you're actually suffering extreme TDS and actual facts mean nothing to you.
@@cchavezjr7
@cchavezjr7 So tell me friend, why have financials at all? Oh, to protect the public. From fraudsters, like at Enron. OUCH. That has to hurt. If you prefer to troll, at least, be good at it. Lets try harder!! You can do it!! Your post lack lacks reference to me: You make "you" look crazy, not in a good or frightening way- But, and this is a big butt- the channel owner only has a few comments!! So he will likely read your own words!! It appears his intent was to shade for Trump!!! For Trolls like you!! Dumb bells. Is that two words? I only ask bc you know the best words.> See? Troll on my friend. Put up your best game, my tiny pene friend. (LOL- give me your phone number and we can get a drink in rl)
@@timisaac8121does this judge hold a real estate appraisal license from N.Y or Florida?
If not, what makes him competent to decide and assign monetary values?
Revenge corruption
Banks do not loan without appraisals. It doesn't matter what the owner thinks their property is worth. Otherwise almost every homeowner that has an opinion on their property's worth would be guilty of the same fraud.
He used mazar's accounting firm to make his property values seem legitimate. In mazar's financial statements, there was a disclaimer, basically saying that the information given to them by the trump organization doesn't hold them accountable for inaccuracies. You could argue that mazar's didn't do their due diligence. All that doesn't matter as he has already been found liable in this civil case. Alina Habba never requested a jury trial. At that point, the judge takes all the information he has at hand and makes his ruling. I say again. He's already liable. In a criminal case, the term would be guilty. This trial or proceeding is only for the judge to decide what trump owes. People are not paying attention to how this works. It's already done. It doesn't matter how many witnesses the defense calls or what is said by employees or his adult children.
you earn both a like and my subscribe: But if your intent was to provide cover for Trump, please try again. The last point "sift" covered by AG was one of many presented in pleading and offers an opportunity to move on: As you correctly point out, what CFO doesn't want "it" to improve? At least, I think you correct. The biggest impression you provide is unintended: We (public) are generally unaware of these specific little battles in Trump cases: To get this type of defense and legal work, Trump really and truly must pay through the nose. (oh, you are a lawyer? What do you get? $420 an hour?_ If you wish to make an "unforgetable" vid, (oh, darn it. It won't give Trump shade... ouch) show how likely it is that District Courts order would be stayed to protect a "not-Trump" defendant. Show me how many defendants sit in jail and take their justice by Video Conference. Hey, Dave, when a lawyer attends their client's video conference, do they still get $420 hour? Best wishes.
All of this is moot. He has already been found liable. This trial is only for the judge to decide how much he will pay. Hearsay doesn't mean anything here.
TRUMP'S DISCLAIMER AT THE ONSET FOR BANKS TO DO THEIR OWN APPRAISALS SHOULD HAVE HAD THIS CASE DISMISSED. IF I WANT TO SAY MY HOUSE IS WORTH 10 MILLION DOLLARS..... I CAN. THE BANK WOULD DO THIER OWN APPRAISAL AND DENY MY LOAN. DUETCHBANK MADE MONEY ON THE LOAN. THEY WERE SATISFIED WITH THE TERMS...... CASE CLOSED !!!!!
Correct. Did you know 190 banks are about to fail? Bank of America is one of the major banks that will be going down.
Trump as President waived $648 million dollars in fines against Deutsche Bank who Trump owed 330million dollars in loans. Four other banks were including the waiver for money laundering and unfair business practices.
It doesn't work like that. Banks and even the IRS go by what you file with them. In your own mind you are trying to rationalize Trump's crimes. They based the loans on the financial information that YOU give them. Trump committed all of the crimes that he is accused of. He lied....he got caught. Case closed!!!
So by your logic....he understated his properties value to decrease what he paid back in taxes and by your all caps rant that too is the governments fault. Standards for rich vs poor so the poor stay poor and the rich stay rich.....okay 👌
Those bank documents have a clause that says the statements are true to the best of your knowledge and its a crime to falsify documents.and if his name is on those documents he's liable.
…everything you brought up as ‘defence’ for Trump has been debunked elsewhere, more eloquently, more truthfully, and with more understanding.