Donald Trump Fraud Trial: The Judge Did WHAT!?!?!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @ericarnaud7983
    @ericarnaud7983 10 місяців тому +109

    I dont think anyone that is biased either way is honorable. 🤔

  • @carlamortimore9166
    @carlamortimore9166 10 місяців тому +95

    Leticia James said that the judge already decided him guilty before the trial even started so I'm praying the Supreme Court will overturn this BS

    • @hydroy1
      @hydroy1 10 місяців тому +5

      And that is clear grounds for appeal witch Trump will be dismissed of all charges as it should be. .

    • @garymiller2624
      @garymiller2624 10 місяців тому

      Read more, stop listening.
      By LAW Justice Engoron ruled before the CIVIL trial began that Mr. Trump had fraudulently inflated his net worth, and announced an initial round of punishments.
      I hope he gets hit with 1 billion dollar fine. He says he is a billionaire.

    • @maxpodrecca2946
      @maxpodrecca2946 10 місяців тому

      Did you graduate from high school?

    • @maxpodrecca2946
      @maxpodrecca2946 10 місяців тому

      Tangerine traitor is going down. Just not on call girl Melania or girlfriend Ivanka

    • @michaelgibbons2556
      @michaelgibbons2556 10 місяців тому

      Wow, you’re bright as a light bulb😂 Chris Kise, Trump’s incompetent attorney filed for a summary judgement before trial started. That’s how the judge found Trump liable for fraud. Summary judgement is a very dangerous and not smart move by the defendant. In summary judgements, the judge only looks at the evidence. There is no direct or cross examination of witnesses, there is no motions to be filed, there is no arguments to be made. It’s evidence vs evidence and that’s it. Very simple, really, even a college bound pre-law student would understand what summary judgment means.

  • @loridavis9904
    @loridavis9904 10 місяців тому +157

    I’m not in law but to have a judge determine guilt before any testimony scares the heck out of me and the way this case has been handled should scare all Americans.

    • @missmarya747
      @missmarya747 10 місяців тому +4

      Thank god because clearly your unaware of my law 63/12.

    • @livinglarge6228
      @livinglarge6228 10 місяців тому +2

      Agreed

    • @LL-fb8wz
      @LL-fb8wz 10 місяців тому +5

      Or being biased saying Trump is a "bad dude".

    • @michellefarley7319
      @michellefarley7319 10 місяців тому +3

      @@jeffmiles1378 let’s be fair he did say “ My law” and in the days of changing definitions to assist in making you, correct, you can’t assume his law or gender. This is ‘Merica the a Un-United States. We’re facts, definitions, science and history are all individualized so everybody can have their truth. Oh, by the way, if you don’t go along with everybody’s individual “truth”, even though it may go against “your truth” it doesn’t matter unless your truth is higher on the oppressed, victimhood hierarchy pyramid.
      In the rule of law applies to everybody equally as long as you have the right ideals, and go along to get along with the current narrative, even if it goes against every ounce of who you are.
      Most reasonable people can see how this could become a problem
      The brainwashed go a long to get along activist group or radicalized slaves used by their overlords to keep their hands clean while pushing their made up, ideologies in order to keep and get more power, would see these people with common sense, some kind of phobe or bigger or anti-whatever the Buzzword is.

    • @robjohnston1433
      @robjohnston1433 10 місяців тому +1

      ​He LOST the case on the EVIDENCE, dummy!
      There was no jury because Trump's idiot lawyer forgot to request one!
      If you knew ANYTHING you would know that "Judge Only" are common and perfectly fair.
      Don't believe the lying crap from Trump!

  • @genevievekinzer869
    @genevievekinzer869 10 місяців тому +112

    One day Judge Engoron will be judged by his judgments.

    • @mariekrolly5249
      @mariekrolly5249 10 місяців тому

      COMING QUICKLY TO ALL OF THEM . HIGHEST JUDGE ! LION OF JUDUH IS HERE .

    • @Not-nice
      @Not-nice 10 місяців тому

      He is a Clown !

    • @johnanthony4194
      @johnanthony4194 10 місяців тому

      Where is JUDUH?@@mariekrolly5249

    • @jimmahan4277
      @jimmahan4277 10 місяців тому

      roflmao so will dishonest don..lmao

    • @jimako6
      @jimako6 10 місяців тому

      Reality bites

  • @gusvonstupen1897
    @gusvonstupen1897 10 місяців тому +79

    This will be overturned on appeal because of the judges actions. Way to go Judge! Thanks for the overturn.

    • @1636patriot
      @1636patriot 10 місяців тому +11

      It should be overturned...it should actually be dismissed...such a bogus case.....I think my house is worth 10 million...big whoop...banks look into it all anyways.....what a waste of taxpayer money

    • @dolesncmor
      @dolesncmor 10 місяців тому

      😃🤣😂😄😄 just like the other cases were overturned. Where's that tsunami you were expecting. I see why Trump loves the uneducated. Their totally clueless.

    • @ricklehman8097
      @ricklehman8097 10 місяців тому +1

      How confident are you?
      Wanna make a wager ?
      Or are you not as sure as you make it seem ???

    • @dirtysilver2841
      @dirtysilver2841 10 місяців тому

      @@1636patriot Agreed, a massive waste of tax payer money. Hell the banks literally loaned out 112 million just two years ago to neighboring property and, it's a fraction of the size of Trumps property. Which begs the question. If the banks and people aren't setting the value and the gov can just come in and set the value... then why stop at Trump???? Hell they can do this to EVERYONE.

    • @gusvonstupen1897
      @gusvonstupen1897 10 місяців тому

      @@ricklehman8097 I dont wager with Democrats they always say one thing and do another.

  • @dougiedorite8296
    @dougiedorite8296 10 місяців тому +129

    This judge has met terms for removal several times.
    I'm sure he will be featured on "Only in NY" videos for years to come.

    • @ricklehman8097
      @ricklehman8097 10 місяців тому +1

      wrong.
      What governing body of judges has said this ??
      Post a quote.
      The only people you've heard say this is trump & his cronies.
      -- Just like every criminal in jail --

  • @mikeschoolcraft21
    @mikeschoolcraft21 10 місяців тому +138

    The judge should be charged for interfering with a trial.

    • @ozziecrosby2092
      @ozziecrosby2092 10 місяців тому

      And election interference

    • @dougiedorite8296
      @dougiedorite8296 10 місяців тому +14

      The prosecution should be charged, for interfering with the LAW.

    • @phylliscurtner5578
      @phylliscurtner5578 10 місяців тому +1

      They both should be disbarred

    • @ricklehman8097
      @ricklehman8097 10 місяців тому

      Well, that was the dumb response, anyone else?

    • @ozziecrosby2092
      @ozziecrosby2092 10 місяців тому

      @@ricklehman8097
      Demoncrats corrupt everything they touch

  • @GrapeApe2018
    @GrapeApe2018 10 місяців тому +33

    There is nothing honorable about the judge in this case. NOTHING!

  • @mikerosner-e2x
    @mikerosner-e2x 10 місяців тому +115

    Dave you are absolutely right. Judge Engoron should NOT be inserting himself into any part of the trial except to rule on an objection. There is a very good case for a mistrial because of the way this judge is acting. He should lose his license, be removed from the bench and be prohibited from practicing law ever again. What he is doing is so bad that he might face jail time.

    • @thatgirlwhousedtohavereall5549
      @thatgirlwhousedtohavereall5549 10 місяців тому +8

      Maybe they want a mistrial. This whole case has been ridiculous. This dishonorable judge thinks he’s a real estate appraiser? I’m also perplexed by Trump’s attorneys failure to bring in the loan officer and a real estate appraiser.
      Is this just a sh’t show with free tickets? Nothing they do on either side makes sense. They do just enough to make it believable but then the judge does something that would place him in the Dunning Kruger category.

    • @acdii
      @acdii 10 місяців тому +9

      Trumps attorney did request a mistrial, however it is the sitting JUDGE who would grant it. That judge has an ego bigger than Trump.

    • @mikerosner-e2x
      @mikerosner-e2x 10 місяців тому +2

      Wrong if they request an appeal the Court of Appeals would be another judge. Hopefully one who abides by law.@@acdii

    • @5695q
      @5695q 10 місяців тому

      @@thatgirlwhousedtohavereall5549 I think that Trump and his attorneys see where this is going, they asked for a mistrial and the judge said no, the prosecutor brought in bank officials thinking they would sink Trump, but instead they said trump did things right and they had no problems lending the money on appraisals and Trumps company paid it back in full. The Judge using this as a grandstand for himself is becoming evident to everyone and when this ends, look out for the lawsuits suing the NYAG and Engoron.

    • @stratman1192
      @stratman1192 10 місяців тому +2

      you nailed it...exactly what the mobster was trying to accomplish..a mistrial.

  • @julieworley3167
    @julieworley3167 10 місяців тому +62

    That JUDGE should be BARRED from practicing ANY TYPE OF LAW!!!! Congress should also step in.

    • @jimmahan4277
      @jimmahan4277 10 місяців тому +2

      congress needs to stay the hell out.

    • @stickcheck3045
      @stickcheck3045 10 місяців тому +4

      @@jimmahan4277 Wrong! Congress needs to get involved....VERY involved! It is illegal to commit election interference!

    • @jimmahan4277
      @jimmahan4277 10 місяців тому

      @@stickcheck3045 TELL TRUMP ABOUT THE ELECTION IN TERFERENCE AND WITH HIM THERE IS NO INTERFERENCE, WHY DIO YOUY THINK HE ANOUNCED HIS RUN SO EARLY. HE THOUGHT IT WOULD BE SOME KIND OF MAGICAL SHIELD TO STOP HIM FROM BEING INDICTED. BUT FACT IS THEY WOULD HAVE DONE HALF THE CRAP SOONER BUT CAN NOT INDICT A SITTING PRESIDENT. AND IF YOU HAVE ANY SMARTS AT ALL YOU WOULD KNOW ITS NOT THE DEMS THAT INDICTED DUMPY ITS THE DOJ. OF WHICH HALF OF THEM DUMPY APOINTED..LOL SO THERES THAT.

    • @jimmahan4277
      @jimmahan4277 10 місяців тому +2

      BOOOO HOOOO HOOO HOO DUMPY DID NIT GET AWAY WITH MURDER BOOO HOOO HOOO. DO YOU WANT SOME CHESE TO GO WITH THAT WHINE.

  • @billstream1974
    @billstream1974 10 місяців тому +47

    The fact that this case was even brought show how f.. up NY is!

    • @chrispfeifer7628
      @chrispfeifer7628 10 місяців тому +1

      If Trump is so innocent , why don't you try doing your taxes and mortgage loans like trump did. See where that gets you. Hint, jails are everywhere

    • @libertyresearch-iu4fy
      @libertyresearch-iu4fy 10 місяців тому +5

      @@chrispfeifer7628 I have. Do you think you are smart? lol

    • @garryodellphillips3116
      @garryodellphillips3116 10 місяців тому

      @@chrispfeifer7628 So you think DJTrump does his own paperwork?? LOL That just about figures..You must be a demo rat.lol

    • @traceymustaca4998
      @traceymustaca4998 10 місяців тому

      New York is a disaster as are so many places in the world. We need God's gov't to take over. Come Lord Jesus, bring God's Kingdom." Thy Kingdom come thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven" asking for Kingdom/ government to come on earth as Jesus as ruler of the Kingdom on earth

  • @prarielady2
    @prarielady2 10 місяців тому +97

    The Judge already said he rules on emotion and said Trump was a bag guy. So many grounds for appeal!!!

    • @juanitaross5492
      @juanitaross5492 10 місяців тому +6

      But he is a bag guy. Trump was not answering the questions. He was up their bragging about his property and giving a campaign speech.

    • @prarielady2
      @prarielady2 10 місяців тому +9

      @juanitaross5492 He was asked a open ended question, so he answered it "Trump" style. He should be allowed to answer, and if anyone objects, it should be the prosecutor........not the judge.

    • @Carol-fx4uk
      @Carol-fx4uk 10 місяців тому +1

      That effing guy

    • @juanitaross5492
      @juanitaross5492 10 місяців тому +3

      He was asked to explain his books .
      Why they were off by billions and if he signed off on them. Trump wouldn't answer he just keep rambling on about his beautiful properties. That's when the judge said just answer did you or did you not signed off on these books. And business dealings. I watched the trial.

    • @dirtysilver2841
      @dirtysilver2841 10 місяців тому +4

      @@juanitaross5492 Trump doesn't have to answer questions for a crime he didn't commit. It is innocent until proven guilty. Not guilty until proven innocent. I swear, people like you hate trump so much, you'll break the law in favor of getting what you want.
      Additionally, it's not within the judges power to object against the answer to a question. There is no power of objection to an answer. There is only objection to the question. Much of this trial is so far out of bounds, it's not even in the same country any more.
      The fact you can't see that just because you hate Trump that much, shows you are not for fair trials. To which I say, may your trial be swift and just as fair as Trumps. Let see how far you get.

  • @RobertAllen-e4i
    @RobertAllen-e4i 10 місяців тому +126

    I think the judge in the Trump case ,all of them have shown their bias in Engeron's case egregious enough to unseat the judge and possibly file charges for judicial misconduct.

    • @0100-g5r
      @0100-g5r 10 місяців тому +3

      Engeron is just biased against criminal behaviour. Trump has to stick to the same rules as any company in New York!

    • @RobertAllen-e4i
      @RobertAllen-e4i 10 місяців тому +1

      @@0100-g5r such a tool,he gave his evaluation suggested that the bank do their due diligence and even if they didn't agree,it was up to the bank to loan or. Not loan.They did,he repayed it, everyone but the communists who can't stand the fact that he is unbribable and decided to try to take his money and tie him up in court,if you refuse to see the facts and be thought controlled you will look around one day and say but I helped you I was on your side,same thing Stalin people said when he started their purge, him today,you tomorrow.

    • @ricklehman8097
      @ricklehman8097 10 місяців тому

      Sure, all the judges are biased - That what every criminal says.
      Will you say that when SCOTUS rules against trump too?

    • @johnanthony4194
      @johnanthony4194 10 місяців тому +1

      What about 'Unbiased' Judge Cannon in Florida?

    • @RobertAllen-e4i
      @RobertAllen-e4i 10 місяців тому

      @@johnanthony4194 Don't you get it,the same lack of Justice you want for him will come for you too.Justbask anyone else who helped install totalitarian justice systems, wait,you can't,they were purged before could change their minds.Smell what's cooking yet.

  • @witolddupa
    @witolddupa 10 місяців тому +111

    Since Judge Engeron valued Trumps property at $25M can Trump pay property taxes based on that value?

    • @billmccullough777
      @billmccullough777 10 місяців тому +9

      DJT paid taxes on an $18 million value, that he provided. Checked this - he last paid taxes based on an evaluation of $33 million. Judge Engaron chose the lowest appraisal, evidently from 2011.

    • @pbziegler
      @pbziegler 10 місяців тому

      He didn't set that value. He used the value used by the tax assessor when Trump appealed the tax assessors higher value. You people live in a bag full of bullshit. Find out stuff outside this cult shaping of the story. Trump is a lying crook.

    • @missmarya747
      @missmarya747 10 місяців тому

      Judges don’t value property 1st of all.
      Since orange pulp say mar a wacko is more has orange pulp paid the taxes on the inflated value??????

    • @malebolgia07
      @malebolgia07 10 місяців тому +4

      @@missmarya747
      Has anyone else paid the higher taxes on an inflated value in the United States?

    • @Crystalsgarden
      @Crystalsgarden 10 місяців тому

      He might be able to financially, but the bigger question is will he? Or will he try to get out of that as well.

  • @larrybielski2696
    @larrybielski2696 10 місяців тому +227

    Wait, wait, wait, it's not the people VS Donald Trump. It's the democrats versus donald trump get It

  • @MarshaleeTraylor
    @MarshaleeTraylor 10 місяців тому +32

    The courts need to be honest

    • @jimmahan4277
      @jimmahan4277 10 місяців тому

      I believe they are.

    • @pampage5898
      @pampage5898 10 місяців тому

      @@jimmahan4277no not always

  • @SheJay_1
    @SheJay_1 10 місяців тому +32

    That judge said Trump was guilty BEFORE the trial even started. SMH!
    Thank you!!

    • @happynurse8706
      @happynurse8706 10 місяців тому +4

      Yes cause factual evidence showed his guilt the trial is about the penalty how ignorant are you

    • @SheJay_1
      @SheJay_1 10 місяців тому

      @@happynurse8706 we'll see

    • @happynurse8706
      @happynurse8706 10 місяців тому

      @@SheJay_1 Yes we will and maybe a miracle will wake you up when they listen to this man talk about what they're giving up in their country for a narcissistic man pretending he's God he is a real sick man and you people that follow this man are very sick very sick you are not mentally healthy

    • @joshuadizon6549
      @joshuadizon6549 10 місяців тому

      I think it is you who is showing your ignorance. How do you pass sentence or pre-adjudge someone to be guilty before any evidence is presented or a defense is mounted? You would accept that if YOU were Trump, or anyone else on trial? I bet not. @@happynurse8706

    • @stickcheck3045
      @stickcheck3045 10 місяців тому

      @@happynurse8706 There WAS no factual evidence showing guilt. Guilt of what? All the experts in the real estate industry have testified that Donald Trump was guilty of nothing and did nothing wrong...PERIOD!!!

  • @joepatriot363
    @joepatriot363 10 місяців тому +10

    LISTEN to what's being said here people. A JUDGE presides over a trial as a Referee and to ensure all the rules are followed, by BOTH SIDES. Whatever the case, NO JUDGE should show any partiality towards either side.

  • @gregrobertson4356
    @gregrobertson4356 10 місяців тому +243

    I believe the judge is bias,it would be nice if the courts were honest

    • @chrispfeifer7628
      @chrispfeifer7628 10 місяців тому +9

      I believe the judge is doing a good job under very tough circumstances. If we did what Trump did with taxes and mortgage loans, we'd be in jail already. He's already been found to have committed fraud, these hearings are about how much it'll cost him

    • @ozziecrosby2092
      @ozziecrosby2092 10 місяців тому +21

      ​@chrispfeifer7628
      But , honestly, since when do you lefties care about the law?

    • @jerrypeal653
      @jerrypeal653 10 місяців тому

      Congress is complicit, they can impeach these biased judges. Take Rudy J. For example, he’s not been allowed to present evidence and accused of not turning over evidence that the FBI deleted. Example the video of women pulling out suitcases from under a table after everyone was sent home was not allowed.

    • @ClintGilbert5
      @ClintGilbert5 10 місяців тому

      He political hack there no real case should have been thrown out over 80% of case is beyond statue of limitations. Besides that there no victim so no one was harmed and banks were paid .

    • @shanrose8283
      @shanrose8283 10 місяців тому +14

      ​@@chrispfeifer7628😂u mean pay back the loan in the full amount in which the bank appraised his property for? If we did that too that would make us law abiding Citizens

  • @raineman1118
    @raineman1118 10 місяців тому +53

    I have a feeling somebody has a lot of dirt on the judge.

    • @dorothy7968
      @dorothy7968 10 місяців тому

      No. The judge is a demoncrat who hates Trump & knows this is mkg him a hero in the eyes of all who hate Trump.

    • @kaybaby1876
      @kaybaby1876 10 місяців тому +2

      I bet you're right, probably with the clerk he's infatuated with.

    • @wesdo77
      @wesdo77 10 місяців тому +4

      Trump didn’t give one succinct honest reply, just nonsense.

    • @dorothy7968
      @dorothy7968 10 місяців тому

      @@wesdo77 The whole thing is nonsense. Judge said he was guilty & ordered all his businesses & property be dissolved before trial ever started & this is just to determine how much he has to pay in fines so it doesn’t matter what he does or doesn’t say. The banks who loaned the money said they weren’t defrauded & would do business with him again but that doesn’t matter bc the judge says he’s guilty of fraud. All 4 of the indictments are nothing more than an attempt to bring Trump down & why they’re trying hard to rush them thru the legal process before the 2024 election.

    • @Crystalsgarden
      @Crystalsgarden 10 місяців тому +1

      Do you mean the photoshopped pictures?

  • @allenlewis2622
    @allenlewis2622 10 місяців тому +79

    He found him guilty before the trail even started. Which is unconstitutional right from the beginning.

    • @janicepalesch9221
      @janicepalesch9221 10 місяців тому +7

      You do not understand the law or summary judgments. Learn something before you post nonsense.

    • @rrkunath
      @rrkunath 10 місяців тому +2

      ​@janicepalesch9221 you should take your own advice.

    • @kevinmcconnell3641
      @kevinmcconnell3641 10 місяців тому

      It’s obviously not unconstitutional at all!! Trump left himself with a bench trial a cause he didn’t file the necessary paperwork to ask for a jury trial!
      As for the guilty verdict, that was the verdict reached based on the evidence introduced at trial!!
      This is the problem in America is people, like you, running off at the mouth about subjects they no nothing of??

    • @ricklehman8097
      @ricklehman8097 10 місяців тому +1

      Wrong.
      The trail happened, & he was found guilty of persistent Fraud.
      THEN, the other charges, & damages portion of the trial proceeded.
      How do you not know that ??

    • @rrkunath
      @rrkunath 10 місяців тому

      @@ricklehman8097 however, the judge erred and showed bias by failing to hear any testimony from experts in real estate before rendering his myopic, biased sentence.

  • @annettecrank3142
    @annettecrank3142 10 місяців тому +17

    I would never call Engeron honorable.

  • @ChicDiscourse
    @ChicDiscourse 10 місяців тому +106

    Very well said!! Thank you for posting this video with the proper analysis of what is and is NOT appropriate for a judge to do in a case like this…with a political defendant, but WITHOUT inserting a political-bias or evidence of being irritated or annoyed just because he doesn’t like the defendant. It’s ridiculous and I can’t believe we are at this point in the “justice” system… what justice?!?!

    • @danhelwig
      @danhelwig 10 місяців тому +5

      We don't call it the criminal system of justice for nothin'.

    • @bretaschleman8289
      @bretaschleman8289 10 місяців тому

      ​@danhelwig
      Well now the corruptocrats are using lawfare to stop their political opposition with biased judges and prosecutors. More fake accusations, investigations and attempted prosecution, 7+ years going.

    • @jonscrivner9087
      @jonscrivner9087 10 місяців тому +8

      This judge has been extremely patient in this case. This is why all of these cases need to be televised. The public and its citizens have a political interest here. No one opinion can speak for all individuals.

    • @ChicDiscourse
      @ChicDiscourse 10 місяців тому +3

      @@jonscrivner9087 ummm…. Did you watch the video? 🫤

    • @jonscrivner9087
      @jonscrivner9087 10 місяців тому +4

      @LoisLane599 This is a trial that the judge is the jury. The defendant chose not to have a jury trial. The analysis by the video creator doesn't seem to take that fact into consideration when voicing his opinion. So yes, I did watch it. This trial should be televised for all to see. That is the only true video. Can you grasp that concept?

  • @robinchemin3631
    @robinchemin3631 10 місяців тому +116

    There's nothing honorable about that evil judge!

    • @jerrydog9047
      @jerrydog9047 10 місяців тому +4

      There's nothing honorable about the dumpster Don ! The truth stands for itself !

    • @kaybaby1876
      @kaybaby1876 10 місяців тому

      This judge is as corrupt as the clerk & the AG. Sit down & STFU. turn off the commie news & stop reading the bird cage liners

    • @johnanthony4194
      @johnanthony4194 10 місяців тому +1

      Not like the TOTALLY unbiased Honorable Judge Cannon in Florida. 😀😃😄😁

    • @ileneplantone3817
      @ileneplantone3817 10 місяців тому

      There's nothing honorable about the failed x prez

  • @rickrobertson7462
    @rickrobertson7462 10 місяців тому +64

    This is not a court case. Its a witch hunt.

    • @JoelAdams-g7x
      @JoelAdams-g7x 10 місяців тому +5

      A Witch Hunt by witches end around looks like Gilligan from Epstein Island

    • @melissaphillips5178
      @melissaphillips5178 10 місяців тому +4

      Yup

    • @jimmahan4277
      @jimmahan4277 10 місяців тому +1

      ROFLMAO. THIS IS CIVAL. DUMPYS LUCKY I HOPE THEY ARNT AS LEINIANT IN HIS CRIMINAL TRIALS WITH HIS MOUTH.

    • @jimmahan4277
      @jimmahan4277 10 місяців тому +2

      @@JoelAdams-g7x I SURE WISH THE WOULD RELEASE THOSE NAMES ON THAT LIST, ILL BET TRUMP IS ON IT..

    • @JoelAdams-g7x
      @JoelAdams-g7x 10 місяців тому

      Joe and Jim Biden own property in on an island nine miles from Epstein island with an Old Navy hidden submarine base Justin Maxwell has a submarine and a submarine license easy for the Biden to get their perv on

  • @jenniferbowie2773
    @jenniferbowie2773 10 місяців тому +26

    He is allowed to answer the questions! That’s your defense!

    • @kathleenferguson3296
      @kathleenferguson3296 10 місяців тому +3

      He doesn't answer the question. He rants.

    • @gunztommiegunz
      @gunztommiegunz 10 місяців тому +3

      @@kathleenferguson3296Trump??? The judge rants for sure but Trump Professionally speaks COHERENTLY!!!!!

    • @michellefarley7319
      @michellefarley7319 10 місяців тому

      @@kathleenferguson3296 he rants? Answering a question is telling someone what you believe is the answer, so who is somebody else to determine if that’s a rant? I’m guessing you probably already a predetermined as well because of all the one-sided knew she washed believe that this man is a hitler Inn Anything the happens to him is OK as long as he doesn’t become president because things were so horrible while he was? And you believe Joe Biden is the guy to save America? I’m guessing you know all about his 47 years in power and every lol he has created an attempted or have passed while being a lawmaker and all of this fake activism, he claims to have done, which 10 times out of 10 turns out to be bullshit. We know this because of the invention of a video and recordings. Pre
      Trump presidency , the majority of people loved him. He was never called antisemitic Hitler, nor racist. He funded Jesse Jackson’s presidential run campaigns twice he was helping out, young black entrepreneurs with loans for their businesses when the banks had a systemic racism problem, only to tear up their checks when they came to pay him back and told him to run their business. He has received numerous awards from the African-American community rappers used to love him there’s over 130 songs by his name is mentioned,can look that up. Is he perfect? Hell know who the fuck is. I have done some stuff I’m not proud of, but I admit it and I know I’m not always right, but at least I try to look at both sides of an argument and look up information for myself. I don’t believe everything out here on any news station or on anybody’s podcast or what any politicians says. The Internet also has this really cool function where you can look up information and several different places to try to get to the closest thing to the truth as you can. And so, while gathering this information, you can come to a Common sense reasonable accurate conclusion. I know that insulation and I told him he was better being run by this businessman than it is now. I know that they lied to us about Covid in these vaccines which I also knew in the beginning, because being in the medical profession, I also have the ability to research, and I knew it was all a lie but yet somehow, we’re just supposed to ignore everybody, telling us to get the pokey in our arm and we would stop transmission and not get sick. I know that silencing opposing opinions, and doing a smear campaign on highly credible doctors and specialist to try to keep their expertise. How did the main stream narrative is suspicious and something I won’t trust, I also don’t trust anybody who stifles other peoples opinions instead of debating with data and facts the opinions of someone I disagree with, and I damn sure don’t trust anybody who’s only counter argument is to go back to elementary school name calling. You ask a question about anything that involves race and if they don’t like your question you’re racist? If I don’t agree with some of the alphabet communities opinions, all the sudden I’m trans phobic? People need to understand what the word a phobic means. It actually look into the history of Hitler and the Nazis. I am so tired of uninformed people just repeating shit. They hear on the news and using it as the absolute truth.
      I prefer new baseless wars, lower taxes and mean tweets from somebody who is far from perfect, but actually cares about is Country and I sacrificed a lot unlike others who just become rich off of being in politics over the bullshit nonsensical clown world we’re living in now

    • @michellefarley7319
      @michellefarley7319 10 місяців тому

      @@kathleenferguson3296 how about the judge making up a fake number like I don’t know $18 million for Trumps property and that’s just supposed to be excepted as correct while a simple google search into real estate in the area will show you that is complete bullshit. But because the judge said it, it’s the truth and not a rant or just a lie. I hope that you get put in front of him or a judge just like him one day and his opinion can determine your future.

  • @maylinegore2166
    @maylinegore2166 10 місяців тому +39

    Why this trial is not finished yet..there is nothing against mr trump

    • @mikeshort9663
      @mikeshort9663 10 місяців тому

      The Dems are attempting the Floyd move on Trump. (Hold him down and not let him speak!) 😮😮

  • @BobPharmacon
    @BobPharmacon 10 місяців тому +49

    No jury, no cameras, no solicitor without a gag, no standing.

    • @0100-g5r
      @0100-g5r 10 місяців тому

      There is no jury because Trumps attorney (Alina Habba) forgot to ask for a jury trial... Trump is always lying, he can't help himself

    • @winstondoc2009
      @winstondoc2009 10 місяців тому +6

      His lawyer asked for this trial in court without a jury, I guess you forgot about that or was ignorant to that fact prior to commenting 🤔

    • @ricklehman8097
      @ricklehman8097 10 місяців тому +3

      Alina Haba screwed the pooch on this one.
      She was supposed to ask for a jury trial, she did not.

    • @BobPharmacon
      @BobPharmacon 10 місяців тому

      That's a lot of love for Donald trump out there. Hopefully when the shoe is on the other foot he will give you a lesson on forgiveness.

  • @marilyncatling6866
    @marilyncatling6866 10 місяців тому +383

    How is this Dem judge allowed to be this biased, why has no one stopped it?

    • @scarecrow_9895
      @scarecrow_9895 10 місяців тому +26

      ​@@Leavingthisroom_12no reason to be disrespectful

    • @chrispfeifer7628
      @chrispfeifer7628 10 місяців тому

      Judges run for office just like any political office. Judges take a oath to follow the law. Trump broke laws and just like everyone has to face the consequences.

    • @lowellirish
      @lowellirish 10 місяців тому

      He's part of the illuminati, thats why

    • @americanatheart110
      @americanatheart110 10 місяців тому

      Yes, u libs and dems are a danger to democracy ​@notTotelltheTruth

    • @ssdtrain1
      @ssdtrain1 10 місяців тому

      Demoncrats won't help anyone that is set
      on exposing them, they stacked the court against Trump, and
      he's still obliterating Biden in the polls 🤣 America knows what this is about,
      it's blatant interfering with an election plain and simple. They are afraid of Trump
      because HE WILL be President.

  • @opinioncounts5490
    @opinioncounts5490 10 місяців тому +45

    That judge looks to be a pervert

    • @ozziecrosby2092
      @ozziecrosby2092 10 місяців тому +10

      That's because he is

    • @libertyresearch-iu4fy
      @libertyresearch-iu4fy 10 місяців тому +9

      He RECENTLY posted bare chested pictures on his university's alumni page. Disgusting.

    • @Jersey-towncrier
      @Jersey-towncrier 10 місяців тому

      Haha I think he looks like my buddy's ferret. Looks like a straight weirdo. I'd be mad at a wealthy guy with a hot wife if I were him, too. Lol

    • @ozziecrosby2092
      @ozziecrosby2092 10 місяців тому +10

      @@libertyresearch-iu4fy
      I'm sure he was a frequent flyer on the Lolita Express

    • @johnanthony4194
      @johnanthony4194 10 місяців тому

      After Rudi's case in Georgia I would be careful with words that could be interpreted as 'Defamation'. Or perhaps you have $148m dollars to spare.

  • @robertajancen9912
    @robertajancen9912 10 місяців тому +18

    Very helpful,I’m sure many of us felt that this judge was the worst person to handle this very important case.

  • @Daskippa2024
    @Daskippa2024 10 місяців тому +38

    She needs to be impeached as soon as possible.

  • @terencegumbs2478
    @terencegumbs2478 10 місяців тому +8

    There should not be a trial in the first place.

  • @Larryputt1
    @Larryputt1 10 місяців тому +3

    Being one of the people in"We the People" , how can we each of us sue each of these my rights are being violated and it does not seem to we have any recourse to have our voices heard anymore.

  • @nancyvaughn354
    @nancyvaughn354 10 місяців тому +19

    There is nothing honorable about this judge

    • @davidroberts4398
      @davidroberts4398 10 місяців тому +3

      DISHONOURABLE.

    • @RobertAllen-e4i
      @RobertAllen-e4i 10 місяців тому

      Nope,bet he is on porn hub with Hunter, probably same sex clubs.

  • @UntilNextime
    @UntilNextime 10 місяців тому +3

    Engeron should sentence himself to life for criminal judging

  • @bayoumeme7743
    @bayoumeme7743 10 місяців тому +7

    That trial needs to be a mistrial. The judge needs to recluse himself

    • @Dude408f
      @Dude408f 10 місяців тому

      good deplorable

  • @nicknitro4420
    @nicknitro4420 10 місяців тому +5

    “They’re not after me, they’re after you. I’m just in the way” (Donald Trump).

  • @joelmclean2898
    @joelmclean2898 10 місяців тому +32

    You kept a straight face when you called him "The Honorable Judge Engeron". Amazing. Then you went on to talk about the role of the judge in this case. That went out the window on day one when he, without officially hearing any evidence or testimony, rendered a summary decision, finding Trump guilty on all counts.

    • @jimmahan4277
      @jimmahan4277 10 місяців тому +2

      WAY MORE HONERABLE THAT THE ORANGE GRIFTER.

    • @joelmclean2898
      @joelmclean2898 10 місяців тому +5

      @@jimmahan4277 ah yes, the orange grifter. The one that screwed the bank so hard that they testified he did nothing wrong? The one that took out that loan and then paid it back with interest as per the loan agreement? What a con man!

    • @spaceflight1019
      @spaceflight1019 10 місяців тому

      Too many haters who can't think straight here.
      Engoron just dismissed the experts, calling them paid shills. This whole mess is going to be thrown out of court on appeal. Trump Org didn't do anything that everyone else in the real estate markets isn't doing.

    • @fergal24
      @fergal24 10 місяців тому

      ​@@joelmclean2898you should Google bankruptcy to understand how he repaid his loans. It's the reason why American banks stopped loaning him money.

  • @MrBurleyfish
    @MrBurleyfish 10 місяців тому +235

    Calling Judge Engoron Honorable insults my intelligence.

    • @bamahama707
      @bamahama707 10 місяців тому +12

      And everyone ELSE who is paying attention.

    • @Dan-cn3ei
      @Dan-cn3ei 10 місяців тому +11

      Should be disbarred!

    • @afightforfreedom5381
      @afightforfreedom5381 10 місяців тому +9

      And the greatness of AMERICA AND HER PEOPLE 🇺🇸

    • @knitwit7082
      @knitwit7082 10 місяців тому +6

      And my sense of what honor means!

    • @matthewgrover8863
      @matthewgrover8863 10 місяців тому

      Every comment is from idiots.

  • @stitch1960
    @stitch1960 10 місяців тому +42

    That was… from what you said was an excellent summary of the one day of the trial. I truly believe Justice John Robert’s was exactly right. The minute a judge uses the evidence as a gong show platform. The blindfold comes off lady justice.

    • @vjm7342
      @vjm7342 10 місяців тому

      Sounds like a crying snowflake

    • @DIANNANTEXAS
      @DIANNANTEXAS 10 місяців тому

      The Judge is an ASS ••• there is no EVIDENCE WHEN YOU HAVE NOT ONE BANK 🏦 SUING TRUMP ••• not one financial company is suing PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP •••• they all made money •••SO WHERE IS THE CRIME????

  • @evelynmcdaniel8681
    @evelynmcdaniel8681 10 місяців тому +5

    This judge's name fits him . He is corrupt as day is long. How can he look in mirror in mornings.😢😢😢

  • @manuelagaba
    @manuelagaba 10 місяців тому +33

    This is a scheme.

  • @tbluemel
    @tbluemel 10 місяців тому +3

    Doesn’t the judge stating a verdict PRIOR to the trial give grounds for dismissing this case, hopefully with prejudice?

  • @dougiedorite8296
    @dougiedorite8296 10 місяців тому +42

    Letitia James and judge Engoron have cost Trump millions in legal fees, to file and
    persue an unlawful case. Which costs NY taxpayers millions also.
    THEIR personal assets should be covering those costs.

    • @bernardhutchinson4753
      @bernardhutchinson4753 10 місяців тому

      I hope Trump sues the life out of that Leticia James & that so called Judge Engoron or (Angermoron)

    • @ricklehman8097
      @ricklehman8097 10 місяців тому

      They supplied evidence, trump did not.

  • @RealCptHammonds
    @RealCptHammonds 10 місяців тому +1

    There's rarely a jury in Europe, which is a big part is why we revolted. How is this still a thing in 2023 in our republic?!?

  • @KelliAnnWinkler
    @KelliAnnWinkler 10 місяців тому +3

    I am amazed that Trump can keep what little composure he has. This whole trial seems a bit of a stretch. Really, how can this NOT be political?

  • @dianneharris2870
    @dianneharris2870 10 місяців тому +16

    CLOWN JUDGE!

  • @lindadavisson-jk1ys
    @lindadavisson-jk1ys 10 місяців тому +42

    Letitia James Judge Engoron, Jack Smith must be disbared and sent to prison

    • @michealholm2900
      @michealholm2900 10 місяців тому +3

      Good luck with That!!!

    • @larrywilliams9068
      @larrywilliams9068 10 місяців тому +7

      NOW

    • @chrispfeifer7628
      @chrispfeifer7628 10 місяців тому

      For what crimes? Holding your new Messiah accountable? Why don't you try doing your taxes and mortgage loans like trump did, see how that goes. You would be in jail. He is receiving special treatment already.

    • @JoyceMadej
      @JoyceMadej 10 місяців тому +1

      And Donald Trump must be locked up. You people are really bias. You can't see that Trump does nothing but lie. Steal and cheat too bad you're so uneducated trumpsters

  • @sandhollowhomestead6972
    @sandhollowhomestead6972 10 місяців тому +3

    Judge has dug a hole he'll never get out of.

  • @alfredmcfarland7860
    @alfredmcfarland7860 10 місяців тому +9

    Excellent clip! Very wise, fair and balanced.

  • @oldwolf1928
    @oldwolf1928 10 місяців тому +57

    Calling that Judge honorable is like calling biden honest!

    • @felicitywoodruffe4087
      @felicitywoodruffe4087 10 місяців тому +5

      Absolutely Joe Biden is honest and the judge is honourable .let's have much more of the same .Trump is such a baby ,spoiled and whiney

    • @stratman1192
      @stratman1192 10 місяців тому

      What has Judge Engoron done that is not honorable? What exactly has President Biden lied about? Maybe the Judge should 'ramble' and 'hurl insults at the witness, as was done by the mobster admiring witness who was attempting to trigger a mistrial.

    • @33sunstar
      @33sunstar 10 місяців тому

      I was going to say, "don't refer to that bias, doesn't know how to be a judge...honorable".

    • @user-justbeingme
      @user-justbeingme 10 місяців тому +2

      Your MAGAT is showing.

    • @oldwolf1928
      @oldwolf1928 10 місяців тому +3

      I wont have a battle of wits with unarmed people-

  • @deannadeason1850
    @deannadeason1850 10 місяців тому +3

    Just another mess. They need to remember, this Man is the Peoples Man. This needs to be with the utmost Respect. Other wise the People will taise cane. We the People pay these people and if there is any injustice it will be called out.

  • @seanfinkbeiner2613
    @seanfinkbeiner2613 10 місяців тому +18

    Very sad how criminal the judge is. Karma Karma Karma to the corrupt.

    • @jimmahan4277
      @jimmahan4277 10 місяців тому

      wheres you proof fool.? put up or shut up.

  • @teddyraffudeen7056
    @teddyraffudeen7056 10 місяців тому +63

    Your clarification of the judge’s role is appreciated. This judge, with all due respect, seems deeply immersed in the proceedings by exploiting every opportunity to include himself in every aspect of the case and interjecting when, contrary to what you just explained, he should refrain; because it seemingly compromises his neutrality as The Judge. My guess is he’s being interruptive, colorful and unnecessarily biased because of his inability to control himself but got the premium role of judge. But this case after all, is of historical importance, and in that context as I see it, the judge wants to be narcissistically inclusive. He wants more than his fifteen minutes of fame. He’s educated, flamboyant, intrusive and a bit grating on the nerves. Too bloody grating sometimes. To the ordinary layman, or jackass like myself, this bias and his opinionated (mis)behavior tells me, for all you know, that he may be a Democrat sympathizer out to out-Trump Donald Trump. This is a court of law and people have a tendency to root for the underdog. Fight fair. And win fairly. If President Trump is guilty let him fall on his own sword and be done with it. Don’t push him down on the blade to finish him off. I respect the court system. The judge is engaging in a lot of shenanigans and should be asked to recuse himself. Give President Trump a fair trial. That’s all we ask. And if you think I’m Republican. No. I’m not. To the winner the spoils. Somebody should suggest, to go along with the apparent non-conformity, that the judge recuse himself. How about you, Mr. Attorney? Stop this judge in his tracks. Give the man a fair trial. He deserves no less.

    • @bobhamulak3646
      @bobhamulak3646 10 місяців тому +14

      Well spoken!
      True justice needs to be fair and without bias.
      Judge Engoron is not the right person to be presiding over this trial.

    • @RobertAllen-e4i
      @RobertAllen-e4i 10 місяців тому +4

      Spoken like a patriot who respects the rule of law.Didnt like the arrogant new yorker,he earned my respect and vote the second time.Maybe he is what they have become but we can see for sure they are.

    • @podunkest
      @podunkest 10 місяців тому

      Arthur Engoron has personally contributed money to anti-trump political groups and his wife is posting shit on social media mid-sham, I mean trial. I don't even like Trump that much but I'm finally gonna vote for him just out of pure principle because they're cheating so hard. Fuck em.

    • @jimmahan4277
      @jimmahan4277 10 місяців тому

      well he has to include himself in every aspect of the case since trumps lawyer did not ask for a jury. and its left up to the judge to decide how guilty of lieing trump is we all know hes a liar but they need to know to what extent to know how much he cheated people and the banks out of to know how much to charge him.

    • @allenlewis2622
      @allenlewis2622 10 місяців тому +1

      He put a gag order on Trump's attorneys to prevent them from getting misconduct on the record.

  • @reekashade
    @reekashade 10 місяців тому +12

    No one thinks this Judge is unbiased,he should be made to stand down…this has to be a mistrial.

  • @darlenegoodall7797
    @darlenegoodall7797 10 місяців тому +2

    That judge is dishonorable
    He needs to be immediately removed

  • @topazlarsen2090
    @topazlarsen2090 10 місяців тому +5

    No honor about that Judge 😡

  • @richardswritingadventure9713
    @richardswritingadventure9713 10 місяців тому +9

    The problem in this trial is the Judges obvious bias and the willingness of Lawyers to give the Judge a pass. This is not casting a good light on a profession that is suffering from low approval in the public mind.

  • @MrsMommaHarley
    @MrsMommaHarley 10 місяців тому +19

    He needs disbarred as well as anyone who faced a decision by this guy needs their cases re-looked at or appealed. This judge is disgusting.

  • @kevinharper888
    @kevinharper888 10 місяців тому +34

    Thank You! I always learn something from your videos!

  • @xavierhamilton7332
    @xavierhamilton7332 10 місяців тому +4

    Engeron is anything but 'honorable'

  • @saffronwetter2221
    @saffronwetter2221 10 місяців тому +8

    "Vote" "Trump"
    Know matter what
    Merry 🎅
    Happy New
    Year!💫💥

  • @billygraham5589
    @billygraham5589 10 місяців тому +3

    I thought “harm suffered” was an essential element to a claim of “fraud” by the party suing and claiming “fraud.” And who involved in the loan transactions in question is claiming “fraud” and “harm suffered?” I understand the banks were paid back? The loans are paid back? So who was “harmed.” How is the state itself claiming “harm” and “fraud” without being a party to such transactions?

  • @nilsabetancourt4196
    @nilsabetancourt4196 10 місяців тому +24

    This judge should be removed. He is a disgrace.!!!

  • @dkrink3
    @dkrink3 10 місяців тому +5

    Engeron is anything but honorable!

  • @blueyedevil3479
    @blueyedevil3479 10 місяців тому +3

    The prosecutor posted a video and stated, “…today, we rest our case. After 11 weeks, the Judge issued a guilty verdict… before the trial began.” How can the judge do that, OR EVEN provide a summary judgement TWO WEEKS prior to the prosecutor resting their case!?
    Like President Trump, or don’t like President Trump… but, fair warning for everyone on all sides… BE CAREFUL THE PRECEDENCE YOU SET, WHEN YOUR BIAS TAKES OVER AND YOU BEHAVE IN SIMILAR OR WORSE MANNERS.

  • @katherinemahon9471
    @katherinemahon9471 10 місяців тому +7

    This trial seems like a Hollywood scripted movie trial. An example of a bad trial that exemplifies the type of trial that is a mistrial. A lesson for the country, via a living example.

  • @bobbyb.6644
    @bobbyb.6644 10 місяців тому +24

    The Judge ? Is that Emmett Brown on the Bench ? Got to love New York State - Off the rails and Proud of It ? Judges 15 minutes of Fame ? Feel likes an Episode of Night Court ? 😏

  • @laurencechesley7363
    @laurencechesley7363 10 місяців тому +4

    When the judge had his mind made up BEFORE the trial started, how can you say it will be a fair and impartial trial. When a judge tells the.defendant to shut up, but let's the prosecution say what they want, how can you say it's a fair and impartial trial. When a judge strips you of your right, how can you say that it's a fair and impartial trial???

    • @Dude408f
      @Dude408f 10 місяців тому

      You must be speaking of another trial
      😀

    • @laurencechesley7363
      @laurencechesley7363 10 місяців тому

      @@Dude408f you MUST be a liberal with blinders on 😃

    • @Dude408f
      @Dude408f 10 місяців тому

      @@laurencechesley7363 I might be, it is possible. You certainly MUST believe I am, so you can feel right.
      Now, going back to the issue, the judge examined evidence and prosecution statements. That's his job and you don't seem to like it. The judge decided one crime was proven and the trial should go on and examine the other charges. You dislike that BECAUSE the defendant is a famous fat con man. That's all.

  • @chrissanders8362
    @chrissanders8362 10 місяців тому +1

    That crooked Judge is a disgrace.

  • @ospee2004
    @ospee2004 10 місяців тому +3

    Yes you have explained the way things should be in a court. But this is a circus put on by the prosecution opps I mean persecution.

  • @davidchristensen9645
    @davidchristensen9645 10 місяців тому +1

    Corruption at its worst!!

  • @jeffhobbs3948
    @jeffhobbs3948 10 місяців тому +4

    Karma will eventually step in but lets hope its sooner than later.

  • @harleysubaru
    @harleysubaru 10 місяців тому +9

    One had tio wonder how many of these psychotic judges are sitting on our courts? Remember even professional psychiatrists have to be analyzed every year! Every robed judge needs tipp be evaluated every year tio make sure they aren't as psychotic like judge endaround!,,

    • @Vern-lu7tp
      @Vern-lu7tp 10 місяців тому +2

      Right on! What have they got to hide ? It's time to find out if they are still fit for the job !

  • @thisguy5017
    @thisguy5017 10 місяців тому +7

    Lol, anyone remember in Star Trek DS9 when the Cardassians explained how their legal system works? "Guilt is determined before the trial, the trial itself is a show for the people so that they can see justice being done", or something to that effect. All verdicts were automatically guilty, to keep the masses in line.

    • @dorothy7968
      @dorothy7968 10 місяців тому +2

      Never watched Star Trek but it’s a good description of what our legal system has turned into.

  • @lukeson3wr505
    @lukeson3wr505 10 місяців тому +1

    That court room was a Circus act out of control

  • @bellaluv1070
    @bellaluv1070 10 місяців тому +3

    Leticia James admitting that the Judge already found fraud before Trumps attorneys were able to present a defense...
    Thats all you need to see imo..

  • @JustPeaceLoveAndKindness
    @JustPeaceLoveAndKindness 10 місяців тому +1

    This is judge, prosecutor and jury…..mistrial.

  • @robertking5766
    @robertking5766 10 місяців тому +7

    This judge should be disbarred

  • @briantrend7401
    @briantrend7401 10 місяців тому +11

    Honorable HA HA HA HA

  • @sandiabill1
    @sandiabill1 10 місяців тому +3

    This is the first time I’m even seeing your channel, and I am truly impressed how the wording does not show bias toward one side or the other. Listening to the first few sentences, I wrongly thought this was another Trump bashing site, I was so wrong. Outstanding commentary sir, genuinely impressed. Thank you!

  • @ADhudson7964
    @ADhudson7964 10 місяців тому +7

    What testimony? They gagged him

  • @ADhudson7964
    @ADhudson7964 10 місяців тому +39

    He convicted him before the trial started. I don’t know that you call it a trial.

    • @cliffordbuttle4529
      @cliffordbuttle4529 10 місяців тому +1

      Agree %%%% 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮🎉🎉🎉

    • @sdrawkcabevad
      @sdrawkcabevad 10 місяців тому

      You should read about what summary judgment is and how it works. I'm guessing that you aren't familiar with it.

    • @daddski1
      @daddski1 10 місяців тому

      @@sdrawkcabevad you MUST be a liberal with blinders on 😃

    • @sdrawkcabevad
      @sdrawkcabevad 10 місяців тому

      @daddski1 I'm guessing that you aren't familiar with what summary judgment is and how it works, either. Copious amounts of evidence were presented to the court with motions by both parties. In-person testimony is not the only type of evidence reviewed in a trial.

  • @RockHudrock
    @RockHudrock 10 місяців тому +5

    In any other courtroom in the United States, Donald Trump would qualify as an expert on real estate development and valuation. I say this as a civil lit atty for 26 yrs, who uses experts in almost every case.

    • @Dude408f
      @Dude408f 10 місяців тому

      That's an interesting opinion. You can call him an expert con. The con is the problem, persistent fraud and so on.

    • @Redspeciality
      @Redspeciality 10 місяців тому

      With that comment, I seriously doubt you were ever an actual attorney. Letting a defendant be an expert witness in his own trial? Ridiculous!

  • @nrthchrlt5
    @nrthchrlt5 10 місяців тому +3

    I may have missed it. Is this regarding the guilt or the obligation for payment?
    For the record, we are looking at the latter, not the former.

  • @williammoore7085
    @williammoore7085 10 місяців тому +2

    Judge engoron should be barred from being a biased judge where Donald Trump is concerned and as such should recuse himself from this trial because of his clear prejudice, or better yet be disbarred from ever being a judge ever again. " Honorable " ? This judge has no honor at all .

  • @dalebrownhill2540
    @dalebrownhill2540 10 місяців тому +4

    The thing that shocks me most about this trial is trumpet. No presumption of innocent. He was presumed guilty and the whole purpose of the trial was to find out what the penalty phase would be. That does not seem like law in america at all

  • @pantarkan7
    @pantarkan7 10 місяців тому +1

    ... can we quit calling judges, who are not acting in honorable fashion, honorable? Asking for a friend.

  • @morgan79347
    @morgan79347 10 місяців тому +13

    Well any reasonable person could see the judge had has a predetermined guilty verdict. Just saying

  • @tomgust28
    @tomgust28 10 місяців тому +4

    Welcome to Hydra
    Winter solider, remember

  • @christ6463
    @christ6463 10 місяців тому +4

    SUBSCRIBED!!! Keep putting out the truth on this shady activist judge also playing Prosecutor!!!

  • @Watchingyou-daily
    @Watchingyou-daily 10 місяців тому +3

    First time catching your content, and I was impressed about it it could help Trump in an appeal

  • @scottpedersen3337
    @scottpedersen3337 10 місяців тому +10

    This judge is not honorable

  • @crsy3
    @crsy3 10 місяців тому +1

    If you want to see how this is all working, start investigating the financial records of everybody involved in the prosecution, including this unhonorable judge.

  • @curtisgreen9267
    @curtisgreen9267 10 місяців тому +5

    Very good information.

  • @Moonbatcrazy
    @Moonbatcrazy 10 місяців тому +2

    Just look at the judges face, would you buy a used car from Guy like that?
    Yeah, OK don’t read it book by its cover but you can see in his eyes. There’s a lot more going on than what he’s doing on the surface.

  • @ralphdoak3rd-tn4sd
    @ralphdoak3rd-tn4sd 10 місяців тому +8

    Lol honorable thats funny! I do not wanna see anymore nip shots from this judge

  • @bouncerslabrealnature9143
    @bouncerslabrealnature9143 10 місяців тому +1

    There is absolutely nothing Honorable about that clown judge at all? Corruption personified for a big Dem paycheck?

  • @jimzimmerman5288
    @jimzimmerman5288 10 місяців тому +6

    That judge is far from honorable.