Thank you SO much Annie for being one of the GREATS! Woman poker players don't get enough credit. Instead they get berated for making mistakes. Don't stop doing what you're doing and I KNOW you will stay at the TOP! Keep making videos!! :)
Thank you very much Annie. I am already seeing an improvement in my overall game thanks to your logical explaination of critical points. I look forward to viewing your other videos. Cheers John
Good points good info ! wish some people would watch the whole vid before commenting!!! PATIENTS in my somewhat fishy opinion is pokers greatest fundamental.
Can she do a video showing how to look at your opponents whole cards while playing them online? experienced players such as herself and Jesus Ferguson are experts at god mode online
Checkers is a simpler game but I would not call it "a version of chess." It somewhat resembles a game with chess pieces and moves where the object is taking all of your opponent's pieces but the objective of chess is so different that checkers isn't a related game.
By the 4th move in chess: over a billion possible positions can occur. In a game of chess: there are more moves possible, than all the atoms in the universe!
she makes good points, but still doesnt help, when the variance is so bad, AA < KK AK < AQ 66 < 55, at critical points Devo columsn are point on, 55 doesnt fold they go river and hit 5
dont' know why there's so much hate directed at her I think she's a pretty good teacher. However she's dead wrong on suited connectors and doesn't understand the math. Yes, if I flop a flush (my dream flop) and someone ships it, of course I'm nervous. But A) It happens rarely, B) They don't always have a higher flush. They can put you on a flush draw or even top pair, maybe they have a set or 2 pair themselves. Many possibilities. But sometimes you will just have to pay off a lucky outlier. In any case you can always be beat if you don't have the steel nuts. However if a suited connector gets the dream flop you will be WAY ahead of the entire table some 90 - 95% of the time. And we are always looking for +ev situations not obsessed with just"being comfortable". If you are +ev wouldn't you want to win the MOST amount of chips or just stack off one player? If you want to win a lot of chips you have to risk facing multiple opponents. Fact is it's wrong to say you're an underdog playing against, say, 4 players when you flopped a flush. It's just not true. There's only a 3 % chance (in a 10 ring game) a person even enters with the same suited cards as you at any given time. She's thinking in a very limited "this hand right now" kind of way - and that won't work in the long run.
I agree totally. She is giving instruction with a results oriented way of thinking. Sure sometimes you will flop a flush with 67s and someone will also have AXs and knock you out but you are exactly right that it is pretty rare, and if i have 6s7s, and the flop comes AsKs3s and I bet in EP, many times the late position guy with 2-pair is shoving here to protect from the flush that he doesn't think is there yet. Sure you could be beat, but you are stacking off every time there. Also, see my other comment about how she said someone is not 3-bet bluffing in EP. I mention how she assumes that when someone re-raises her they are telling her the truth i.e. that their 3-bet always means it is a strong hand. That is nonsense! If someone plays so straightforward they are going to be so exploitable. I mean its like this: if we are playing rock paper scissors and I know that you throw rock 100% of the time, you are exploitable... Great comment BTW
This reply is all sorts of wrong and contradictory also total lacking any mathematical break downs which is ironic seeing that you called her out for not knowing the math.
Computers are never solving chess. Even if you had an array of a trillion microprocessors each one processing a trillion chess moves every NANOSECOND that would be around 10^33 moves in a second. After a day it's around 10^37. After a year around 10^40. After a trillion years 10^52 and after a trillion trillion years 10^64. Number of atoms in the known universe? 10^82. Number of possible chess games in a 30 move game of chess? 10^120
Chess will never be solved. I understand the point she's making but she's naive about the numbers we're talking about. To solve chess you would need a full map of all legal possible outcomes (games). If you had a computer calculating a trillion moves a second, nah, let's say a trillion microprocessors each calculating a trillion moves a second, nah, let's say a trillion microprocessors calculating a trillion moves every NANO second you would get to around 1E^33 moves in a second. After a day 1E^37, after a year 1E^40, after a trillion years 1E^52, after a trillion trillion years,, 1E^64. Number of atoms in the known universe ? 1E^82. Number of possible games in a 30 move game of chess? 1E^120
Annie duke - just listed to poker tournament story on moth. Playing the victim as a woman is only teaching other females to approach the world with victimhood. Stop the nonsense already. Unbelievable.
The most amazing poker lecture of my entire life (31 years old and 4 with poker). Thank you a lot!
love it, great logic behind 76s
This was the most useful vid I've seen yet
I know. So much disinfo from training sites and youtubers. Confuses you. I think I'll go back to all that Action Dan taught me.
Annie Duke! What a GREAT seminar! Tks Annie!
Great speaker and presentation
Thank you SO much Annie for being one of the GREATS! Woman poker players don't get enough credit. Instead they get berated for making mistakes. Don't stop doing what you're doing and I KNOW you will stay at the TOP! Keep making videos!! :)
Majority of women can't stand up to men in poker. Deal with it.
She’s an egomaniac cheating thief, support the good women if you only want to support women in poker. Idiot
Awesome!
Annie Duke! If I was a Hollywood producer, I'd get a script written for you. You're Aces with me. Thanks for the show and the info.
This is brilliant. Thanks.
I love Annie Duke. Don't care what the haters think.
Thank you very much Annie. I am already seeing an improvement in my overall game thanks to your logical explaination of critical points. I look forward to viewing your other videos. Cheers John
Good points good info ! wish some people would watch the whole vid before commenting!!! PATIENTS in my somewhat fishy opinion is pokers greatest fundamental.
+TheRIBLING You mispelled patience
You both forgot to punctuate.
@@kevinketcherside7510 Patients is a different game entirely....
She's such a great teacher.
Can she do a video showing how to look at your opponents whole cards while playing them online? experienced players such as herself and Jesus Ferguson are experts at god mode online
Maybe it's in her book. maybe under a chapter named UltimateBet scam
😂😂😂
I could listen to her talk about anything.
Checkers is a simpler game but I would not call it "a version of chess." It somewhat resembles a game with chess pieces and moves where the object is taking all of your opponent's pieces but the objective of chess is so different that checkers isn't a related game.
I think she was just lopping all games with complete information together..
@29
Haha just came here for the comments!
Brilliant
Gotta respect a woman who doesn't wear a bra on stage. Such a boss...
By the 4th move in chess: over a billion possible positions can occur. In a game of chess: there are more moves possible, than all the atoms in the universe!
Alfreedom You must mean more possible sequences of moves.
she makes good points, but still doesnt help, when the variance is so bad, AA < KK AK < AQ 66 < 55, at critical points Devo columsn are point on, 55 doesnt fold they go river and hit 5
This girl is crazy... I like it
In a game of chess; there are more positions possible, than all the atoms in the universe. Not that same as checkers.
Hence why checkers has been solved and chess hasnt.
That's not mathematically possible. Besides, there are more move combos in Go than in Chess so this is just not even logically possible.
I didn’t understand the trump joke
thought provoking cept the concept of poker is deception ie lying cheating an stealing lmao
One bracelet and she’s teaching how to play poker?
Wasn’t she part of the online cheating scandal?
dont' know why there's so much hate directed at her I think she's a pretty good teacher. However she's dead wrong on suited connectors and doesn't understand the math. Yes, if I flop a flush (my dream flop) and someone ships it, of course I'm nervous. But A) It happens rarely, B) They don't always have a higher flush. They can put you on a flush draw or even top pair, maybe they have a set or 2 pair themselves. Many possibilities. But sometimes you will just have to pay off a lucky outlier.
In any case you can always be beat if you don't have the steel nuts. However if a suited connector gets the dream flop you will be WAY ahead of the entire table some 90 - 95% of the time. And we are always looking for +ev situations not obsessed with just"being comfortable". If you are +ev wouldn't you want to win the MOST amount of chips or just stack off one player? If you want to win a lot of chips you have to risk facing multiple opponents. Fact is it's wrong to say you're an underdog playing against, say, 4 players when you flopped a flush. It's just not true.
There's only a 3 % chance (in a 10 ring game) a person even enters with the same suited cards as you at any given time.
She's thinking in a very limited "this hand right now" kind of way - and that won't work in the long run.
Pablo Pena, Very good points.... xcept I believe there's a 0% chance another player at same table has the same suited cards as you.
I agree totally. She is giving instruction with a results oriented way of thinking. Sure sometimes you will flop a flush with 67s and someone will also have AXs and knock you out but you are exactly right that it is pretty rare, and if i have 6s7s, and the flop comes AsKs3s and I bet in EP, many times the late position guy with 2-pair is shoving here to protect from the flush that he doesn't think is there yet. Sure you could be beat, but you are stacking off every time there.
Also, see my other comment about how she said someone is not 3-bet bluffing in EP. I mention how she assumes that when someone re-raises her they are telling her the truth i.e. that their 3-bet always means it is a strong hand. That is nonsense! If someone plays so straightforward they are going to be so exploitable. I mean its like this: if we are playing rock paper scissors and I know that you throw rock 100% of the time, you are exploitable...
Great comment BTW
This reply is all sorts of wrong and contradictory also total lacking any mathematical break downs which is ironic seeing that you called her out for not knowing the math.
Joan Rivers watched this video....NOT!
the last person id want poker tips from.
annie the "easy read" duke.
32:24 🤣
How Wierd Weird Criminalist GL B-)
Computers are never solving chess. Even if you had an array of a trillion microprocessors each one processing a trillion chess moves every NANOSECOND that would be around 10^33 moves in a second. After a day it's around 10^37. After a year around 10^40. After a trillion years 10^52 and after a trillion trillion years 10^64. Number of atoms in the known universe? 10^82. Number of possible chess games in a 30 move game of chess? 10^120
This is the LAST person who should be giving advice on making good decisions.
why is she treating the audience like elementary students?
So everyone can understand, there's a surprising amount of idiots out there.
Chess will never be solved. I understand the point she's making but she's naive about the numbers we're talking about. To solve chess you would need a full map of all legal possible outcomes (games).
If you had a computer calculating a trillion moves a second, nah, let's say a trillion microprocessors each calculating a trillion moves a second, nah, let's say a trillion microprocessors calculating a trillion moves every NANO second you would get to around 1E^33 moves in a second. After a day 1E^37, after a year 1E^40, after a trillion years 1E^52, after a trillion trillion years,, 1E^64. Number of atoms in the known universe ? 1E^82. Number of possible games in a 30 move game of chess? 1E^120
Expert scammer teaches how to make better decisions, lovely
Annie duke - just listed to poker tournament story on moth.
Playing the victim as a woman is only teaching other females to approach the world with victimhood. Stop the nonsense already.
Unbelievable.