The Most Overrated/Underrated Camera & Video Gear

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 528

  • @curtisjudd
    @curtisjudd 3 роки тому +663

    I just dropped by to catch the next “Not a Podcast” episode. And now I’m nearly crying to hear that sound blankets are underrated. That brings a tear to my eye! Thanks Gerald and Josh, you are the best!

    • @alonsolopez7901
      @alonsolopez7901 3 роки тому +5

      I’m crying too with this crossover. Great content. Greetings from Perú 🙌

    • @TheIkeRai
      @TheIkeRai 3 роки тому +4

      Curtis, I give you FULL credit for helping me get my studio's audio setup right. I'd still be struggling if it weren't for your keen insights (and me spending dozens of hours learning from your videos). For Toronto, a HUGE thanks!!

    • @teacherofteachers1239
      @teacherofteachers1239 3 роки тому +1

      If it weren't for Curtis I never would have tested these sweet sound blankets, which really helped on two recent projects. The stand that company sells for these is, for me, 2/3 good, 1/3 not - but that's a conversation for another day. - Dave

    • @EdoDijkgraaf
      @EdoDijkgraaf 3 роки тому +5

      Nice that they give you the appreciation you deserve Curtis Judd.

    • @mossiegee4674
      @mossiegee4674 3 роки тому +2

      I record live music in peoples homes, sound blankets have become a religion for me

  • @JesseDriftwood
    @JesseDriftwood 3 роки тому +555

    Curtis Judd is the most underrated piece of camera equipment.

    • @DevanteJohnsonDOP
      @DevanteJohnsonDOP 3 роки тому +11

      Fact!

    • @Matt.Gillard
      @Matt.Gillard 3 роки тому +13

      You mean Curtis Judd is the most underrated piece of Sound Equipment

    • @TsusStuff
      @TsusStuff 3 роки тому +4

      Criminally underrated!

    • @codythep
      @codythep 3 роки тому +1

      True in my veins

    • @SeanMarsalis
      @SeanMarsalis 3 роки тому +1

      Hi Jersey Dirtfoot!

  • @EastonParkhurst
    @EastonParkhurst 3 роки тому +131

    Curtis Judd is underrated gear 10/10. All jokes aside, he is a legend

  • @dslrvideoshooter
    @dslrvideoshooter 3 роки тому +89

    Sound blankets baby!

    • @AndroSpud
      @AndroSpud 3 роки тому +4

      Caleb Pike is seriously the most under rated gear on the tube. The mans camera tutorials are second to none.

  • @tomdchi12
    @tomdchi12 3 роки тому +38

    Fully agree on St. Curtis of Judd. I have directly asked him wether moving blankets can be good enough vs. Vocal Booth To Go/Producer's Choice real sound blankets. In his astoundingly polite way, he basically said "Yeah, moving blankets don't cut it. You need the real thing," and of course, he was right. The things are unexpectedly heavy and clearly different than Home Depot moving blankets. Also, I hate pressure on my yolk.

  • @JohnCooganPlus
    @JohnCooganPlus 3 роки тому +32

    Curtis Judd is the best! Extremely underrated!

  • @MirdjanHyle
    @MirdjanHyle 3 роки тому +27

    Where's the Affiliate Link so I can buy myself some spare Curtis Judd?

  • @sailonstellarwinds
    @sailonstellarwinds 3 роки тому +18

    Hoods, yes! Every time I pass through a doorway and hear BONK it warms my soul to remember that it's a plastic lens hood bonk and not a glass/aluminium bonk.

  • @kevinanastacio8529
    @kevinanastacio8529 3 роки тому +13

    The hood and flare really depends on the context of the shoot. Some flare gives the vintage creative feel which I love. But sometimes you don't want the sun to totally kill the contrast and wash your whole scene.

  • @ChuckThree
    @ChuckThree 3 роки тому +12

    Concern about errant hockey pucks is the most Canadian thing I’ve heard in a while lol 8:19

  • @impatrickt
    @impatrickt 3 роки тому +1

    I sleep under sound blankets. seems more practical that way.

    • @curtisjudd
      @curtisjudd 3 роки тому +1

      Patrick, you consistently produce some of the best ideas.

    • @impatrickt
      @impatrickt 3 роки тому +1

      @@curtisjudd I try 🙏

  • @usernamehandle
    @usernamehandle 3 роки тому +8

    I LOVE this series so much. I hope it’s picking up steam. I feel like when “Not A Podcast” is in the title, some folks might not watch thinking it is actually a podcast and doesn’t contain practical info

  • @ruaangrobler3035
    @ruaangrobler3035 3 роки тому +3

    It's pretty crazy that I feel comfortable clicking the like button before I even watch more than 5% of your videos (meaning duration, not your library). Your channel is amazing and the quality of the content and the knowledge presented is just miles above the rest. Exceptional work Gerald, always. And much love to MakeArtNow too - just inspired.

  • @stopthefomo
    @stopthefomo 3 роки тому +2

    Agreed re Curtis J!

  • @LarsLarsen77
    @LarsLarsen77 3 роки тому +1

    Every single youtuber is wrong about lens hoods. They think it's just about flares, but in reality the main thing a hood does is increase the contrast of the image.

  • @jaydivina533
    @jaydivina533 3 роки тому +14

    Gerald: Appreciates all studio gear accordingly.
    Me: Goes to studio and hugs all the gear.
    Thanks Gerald and Josh. Loving the NotaPodcast format.

  • @ctrice
    @ctrice 3 роки тому +41

    Curtis Judd deserves all the respect!

  • @tombuck
    @tombuck 3 роки тому +3

    Curtis is also just a super nice guy, so I guess that makes him Curteous Judd.

  • @bjs2022
    @bjs2022 3 роки тому +14

    It’s important that a protective filter, whether UV or clear, have a good anti-reflective coating.

  • @EposVox
    @EposVox 3 роки тому +14

    I love that you two were basically just fighting each other on this

  • @tsiturbotsi
    @tsiturbotsi 3 роки тому +32

    Love the "not a podcast". I look forward to watching every time.

  • @ThisIsTechToday
    @ThisIsTechToday 3 роки тому +75

    I loooove REAL sound blankets. I also have two legit portable vocal booth panels that fold. I used them in a garage in a recent video and it sounded so good with just a light distant reverb.

    • @DMProductionsHQ
      @DMProductionsHQ 3 роки тому

      What's the name of those foldable panels?

    • @JibaroTech
      @JibaroTech 3 роки тому

      theres any other place that can ship a little cheaper than the ones gerald recomended? the shipping to PR its $185 plus taxes, its $400 for a sound blanket, ill stay with my reverb more than happy before paying that hehehe

    • @ThisIsTechToday
      @ThisIsTechToday 3 роки тому +2

      @@JibaroTech Density is an important factor for sound treatment, that's why it costs a lot. They're super heavy.

    • @JibaroTech
      @JibaroTech 3 роки тому

      @@ThisIsTechToday I really want real sound blankets but I need to see if I find a place over here that have them. Thanks for the input!

  • @gregelgie
    @gregelgie 3 роки тому +8

    I had a lens hood save my macro lens when my tripod teetered over onto a cement floor. The hood broken but the lens was relatively unscathed. I always use them now.

  • @MarcusHutsell
    @MarcusHutsell 3 роки тому +1

    THANK YOU Gerald for calling it what it is.........REVERB! I hate it when people say "echo," cuz it ain't echo (usually). Reverb, reverb, reverb. I love this series with you and Josh, keep it up guys!

  • @CharlieVN
    @CharlieVN 3 роки тому +2

    Agree on the parabolic boxes comment, umbrella/soft box + inverse square law, can totally do the trick

  • @SmartEnergyLab
    @SmartEnergyLab 3 роки тому +6

    Yup, Curtis Judd has transformed my audio quality. I love his voice too.

  • @ToKiniAndy
    @ToKiniAndy 3 роки тому +1

    Davinci Resolve 100%! I made the change almost 2 years ago, and it was the best choice I ever made. So glad you mention it.

  • @chrisrock340
    @chrisrock340 3 роки тому +23

    Spoken like a true Canadian: "Lens hoods are super useful for photographing hockey".

  • @The_CGA
    @The_CGA 3 роки тому +1

    If I want flare, I’ll add it in post. And if you ever catch me on a hoverboard with a gimbal, you bet I won’t trust the safety of my lens enough to ditch the hood

  • @7ombische
    @7ombische 3 роки тому +1

    Scientifically speaking parabolic soft boxes don’t work. The parabolic shape works when the light source points inwards and reflects outward allowing the shape to align all the light beams so that they are parallel.
    We’ve used a beauty dish soft box with less depth and they worked great - allowed us to use a grid to shape the light.

  • @davidpark9325
    @davidpark9325 3 роки тому +1

    I love the gear conversation. Often purchases border on personal ego and we start to get defensive and u guys so good to have the arguments out on the table.

  • @brynocerouss
    @brynocerouss 3 роки тому +4

    Commenting as I watch:
    - DIY Perks has a DIY sound panels made with cheap towels that does a fantastic job (of course then you have to make it, so cost/benefit)
    - I agree with Gerald about the lens hood and with Josh about uv filter (both for protection)
    - I don't know much about lighting, but I do think you can get away with less expensive diffusion (compared with a parabolic softbox at least). I've had pretty great results with a Godox light with a simple reflector and an umbrella.

    • @trowaclown
      @trowaclown 3 роки тому +1

      If you scroll through that DIY Perks video you'll see some very thoughtful comments on why his methodology is very flawed.

    • @brynocerouss
      @brynocerouss 3 роки тому

      @@trowaclown I'll take a look at that!

  • @panaceiasuberes6464
    @panaceiasuberes6464 3 роки тому +1

    This channel pays itself just on the info it transmits. I have some managerial roles pertaining show biz and I've become so much informed about the ins and outs of video producing and editing.

  • @CajunDave79
    @CajunDave79 3 роки тому +1

    In cinematography we call the clear glass that protects your lens an optical flat filter/glass..

  • @ddawg3230
    @ddawg3230 3 роки тому +1

    I usually remove the hood on a gimbal, but when going into a wedding crowd...the hood usually comes on, unless I already have an ND filter on the lens :3

  • @GrandHuevotes
    @GrandHuevotes 3 роки тому +1

    Also for shooting at the beach, Clear/UV filters are great because the salt spray builds up seconds after each photo and it’s nice to wipe the filter than the actual lens

  • @MoonbeamArcade
    @MoonbeamArcade 3 роки тому +2

    Lens hood is a must if you film unscripted stuff because you can end up in a situation where flare can wash out the entire image.

  • @BillTheTechnoGypsy
    @BillTheTechnoGypsy 3 роки тому +1

    Curtis Judd - Wow! I learned sooo much from about audio when I started my channel 5 years ago. Great resource to learn the basic from and grow on your own. Jerrold is awesome too!

  • @juanjgf
    @juanjgf 3 роки тому +5

    If im going after wildlife, unless its a very specific "artsy" shot of like the silouette of a bird with the setting sun behind or something like that, I don't want flares, even then... I'm not sure... However, I keep them on mostly for lens protection.

  • @candinmuniz3225
    @candinmuniz3225 3 роки тому +7

    Gerald: "Parabolic Softboxes are overrated."
    Me using a shower curtain as my light diffusion: "Hmm yes. Agreed."

  • @kirkdarling4120
    @kirkdarling4120 3 роки тому +1

    Chiming in for @Curtis Judd. Totally underrated, totally essential. Also, same for @Caleb Pike. I've watched both of them within the past six hours.
    I was never clear whether you guys meant "parabolic soft box" to mean all soft boxes or specifically true parabolic umbrellas with diffusion front surfaces. If the diffusion surface is effective (even across the surface) it makes no difference whether the umbrella behind it has a true parabolic curve. But it sounds like you're using the term "parabolic soft box" simply to mean "soft box."

  • @ChadSchrandt
    @ChadSchrandt 3 роки тому +5

    I think things are changing with resolve. I just convinced my company to switch completely over to resolve and I don't think we're ever going to look back. Every release it's updated with major features and QOL improvements. Best part of all is that you buy it once and use it for life. Suck it Premier.

  • @itcamefromabox
    @itcamefromabox Рік тому +1

    lens hoods have saved me so much glass. ill never go without 'em because of that alone!

  • @markyfrencho
    @markyfrencho 3 роки тому +2

    Sound blankets, yes! Honestly, moving blankets do work well. I love a good pile of all black moving blankets. Shooting a commercial in a really nice house, I wrapped the bottom of my C-stands with a moving blanket and could slide my lights anywhere on the wood floor without scratching or marring the floor or furniture.

  • @CodySmithPhotos
    @CodySmithPhotos 3 роки тому +1

    I was doing a group photo once and stood on a chair, fell off the chair and smacked the front of the lens on the ground. I broke the lens hood but the lens was fine. Probably would have broken the lens if I didn't have the lens hood on.

  • @alantuttphotography
    @alantuttphotography 3 роки тому +1

    As far as light modifiers, diffusion umbrellas are definitely underrated. Quick and easy to set up, and as long as you don't mind the extra spill, they work great. Softboxes are only necessary if you want darker shadows in your "unlit" areas.

    • @andytaplin1312
      @andytaplin1312 3 роки тому +1

      Yes umbrellas are great for a soft source when spill is not an issue - which is most of the time in the real world.

  • @leestuart38
    @leestuart38 3 роки тому +1

    And now here I am ordering rolling stands and sound blankets. Dammit.

  • @BrunoBeltran
    @BrunoBeltran 3 роки тому

    There's tons of these, "top 5 underrated gear" videos but somehow listening to you guys it really feels like I'm getting something much more real, and I really appreciate that.
    Or maybe it's that you're validating my decision to go full v mount for all my gear....

  • @travisminneapolis
    @travisminneapolis Рік тому

    I'm a fan of the Lightdome parabolic softboxes because they're SO FAST to setup and have nice cases and can be stored with a grid and diffusion cloth all at the same time. Less than 2 minutes to fully setup a 5ft softbox.

  • @themikereda
    @themikereda 2 роки тому

    I 100% agree with Gerald's point about the parabolic soft boxes. They're the go-to resource, every non-famous UA-camr is making videos about how to light your UA-cam channel and it's a 300D with a Light Dome every time. Aputure's UA-cam channel is actually great about showing how ELSE to use their lights and I wish more cinematographers and videographers would take note. Just like you said, use a 4x4 or a 5-in-1 or bounce off the wall, hell you could even use a bedsheet or a shower curtain and get an even softer look that way.

  • @czarlez
    @czarlez 3 роки тому +21

    Yes a moment of appreciation to Curtis!

  • @Brian-Hansen
    @Brian-Hansen 2 роки тому

    Lighting, I completely agree on your comments on lighting. There’s so much to learn and so many techniques that nobody tries.

  • @raildude270
    @raildude270 3 роки тому +2

    Lens hoods are amazing when shooting into the sun, you loose so much contrast sometimes. Think about looking into the bright sun and putting your hand over your eyes to see better, it’s the same idea

  • @crystalpulseTV
    @crystalpulseTV 3 роки тому +1

    Lens hood has SAVED my bacon, many times

  • @HeresMo
    @HeresMo 3 роки тому +1

    Curtis just recommended me sound blankets too. I spent a small fortune on foam panels, base traps and acoustic panels. Still need more. Am going to test the blankets tomorrow. Before I fork out for more panels

  • @TechnoBabble
    @TechnoBabble 3 роки тому +1

    The flare thing depends. It CAN look good if that's specifically what you're going for, but if I don't want a flare or glare than I want as much contrast as possible. Plus it DOES definitely protect the lens like Gerald said.

  • @heartspacers
    @heartspacers 3 роки тому +2

    Awesome video! Would be cool to see another one of overrated/underrated about filmmaking skills/techniques.

  • @ddgarage7025
    @ddgarage7025 3 роки тому

    Big time for lens hoods! I do club and event photography as well as motorsports. People bump into you, spill drinks etc. Even when shooting in rain it helps to avoid droplets on the lens which catch light in annoying ways sometimes

  • @RafaelLudwig
    @RafaelLudwig 3 роки тому +1

    Learning Lighting First: It makes any camera a great camera. Also, sound blankets ftw.

  • @notgazo7009
    @notgazo7009 3 роки тому +1

    I only use a UV filter on my RF 50 1.2 because the front element moves when focusing and using a UV filter makes it completely sealed against dust.

  • @fjhphoto
    @fjhphoto 3 роки тому

    Lighting is definitely underrated. I've seen top youtubers who aren't knowledgeable about lighting wonder how to increase the production quality of their videos and lighting is definitely it.

  • @Phoebetheboss
    @Phoebetheboss 3 роки тому

    Totally agreed on the parabolic soft boxes. I now use a lantern soft box to avoid a cutoff line that a regular soft box still has. Especially useful in lighting food or flat lays.

  • @NormalizingAtheism
    @NormalizingAtheism Рік тому

    Let me preface, not only do I use your channel & content for an insightful resource, but I really enjoy your reviews of tech. Now, how on earth did I miss this masterpiece of a video?! Not that you should quit your day job,but I’d subscribe to more of this content in a heartbeat!

  • @chrisbrockhurst
    @chrisbrockhurst 3 роки тому

    This is really useful for people to watch, you could easily make over/under rated a series

  • @chosenideahandle
    @chosenideahandle 3 роки тому

    Parabolic soft boxes are in my closet collecting dust since buying big LED flapjacks from Falconeyes. I can thank Caleb Pike's review for that. Huge space saver if you don't want to constantly be collapsing domes. I can put them flat up against a wall when I'm not using them (I live and shoot in my studio, so I keep them on rolling stands). They of course have their place (especially when you really need big power), but there is usually no need for a light and diffusion to be two separate solutions in my use case.

  • @Soupcan13
    @Soupcan13 3 роки тому +1

    Awesome video as always man. Love the back and forth between you

  • @rsmith02
    @rsmith02 3 роки тому +1

    Love the Curtis Judd with golden halo. Love his advice!

  • @DWPLife
    @DWPLife 3 роки тому +1

    I remember when Parabolic lighting was becoming main stream and it was largely due to the Briese lighting systems. This was about the time that RED was making splashes in the industry for the first time and photographers were looking for lighting that could be both photo and video. And they were used primarily by fashion and beauty photographers who wanted to mimic beauty dish light for video. And they were always more of a "show piece" to impress the clients. I cant tell you how many times ive had to set up a briese for a photogrpaher and we never even turn it on. But it looks awesome on set, and if its set up, the client has to pay for it! Shortly after everyone and the mother was asking for a Briese at studios, Broncolor came out with their first parabolic. Parabolic light modifiers have ALWAYS been more of a trend than a truly utilitarian light source. They are massive and expensive and the quality of light can be duplicated in numerous cheaper ways. It blows my mind that so many youtubers, creators who are generally hailed for their crafty/low budget ingenuity, use such expensive and unnecessary light modifiers.

  • @GoodGuysMedia
    @GoodGuysMedia 3 роки тому +1

    You da man Gerald! I love this collab!! The back and forth dialog is golden

  • @peterfritzphoto
    @peterfritzphoto 3 роки тому

    I always learn something, here. Just set up a sound blanket in my new studio (eldest daughter's old bedroom), and about to do some testing. Thanks, Gerald.

  • @CountBenula
    @CountBenula 3 роки тому +1

    Acoustic blankets are a huge fire hazard. Please for the love, they should be temporary or fire rated.

  • @MichaelWTurner
    @MichaelWTurner 3 роки тому

    Played with Davinci one time two years ago and said I would edit my next project in it...two years later I'm still using premiere because I never did. You're making me want to try it again. Good stuff 👍

  • @followtheboat
    @followtheboat 3 роки тому +1

    I tell you what is over-rated: the UA-cam algorithm! I'd completely forgotten I'm subscribed to Curtis Judd's channel because I hadn't seen an update from him in ages! Stupid algorithm. Thanks for the reminder, and for another great not-a-podcast.

  • @thearabicdp
    @thearabicdp 3 роки тому +2

    I'm with you on the light dome. They are useful for interviews so I see Josh's point. But I've been getting into lighting using other methods such as the 5 in one reflectors with the one diffuser and reflecting light as well. So I can see your point. Also if you do product photography on glass it does not look as good as a long rectangle soft box

  • @photojoseph
    @photojoseph 3 роки тому +1

    Time to revisit that stack of acoustic blankets sitting on a shelf…

  • @ChiamFilms
    @ChiamFilms 3 роки тому +1

    I’m with Josh on this one ! UV filters are like a screen protector for your lens . MUST HAVE for my workflow as well .

  • @karlnovel
    @karlnovel 3 роки тому +3

    Honestly Daniel is underrated too! I love his editing

  • @EazyRed
    @EazyRed 3 роки тому +1

    Been using davinci resolve for years, learning curve is rediculously steep, but I F****ng love it!

  • @david.stachon
    @david.stachon 3 роки тому +1

    That shadow on the left side of Josh's face is just bizarre.
    Otherwise, enjoyable video.

  • @jesseyules
    @jesseyules 3 роки тому +3

    Curtis Judd has my favourite "teacher" speaking style. Calm, patient and authoritative.

  • @joshuabutlermusic
    @joshuabutlermusic 3 роки тому

    I installed DaVinci Resolve a few months ago to try it out. I have not opened Premiere Pro since. I HATED nodes at first but now have no idea why I waited so long to try them out. What a game changer.

  • @xmeda
    @xmeda 2 роки тому +1

    Lens hoods improve contrast significantly on lenses with front element exposed to side-light.

  • @lubintasevski5985
    @lubintasevski5985 3 роки тому

    As an event photographer, early on in my career, I did shoot in clubs and I had two occasions where my UV lens (yes it was unnecessary in low light environments) broke from bumping into things in the sardine can called a club. I learned to use the included hood to save me lots of money, but that did get dinged up a lot. Though you can get 3rd party hoods to use as lens protectors if you plan to resell your equipment.

  • @dodmedia
    @dodmedia 3 роки тому

    The issue I have with the light dome and other parabolic deep modifiers is that the moment you stick that diffusion sock on (which for video I basically always do), they just become a softbox, so that extra depth is redundant. My studio is small. I need small modifiers or indeed use other means of bouncing and diffusing 😀

  • @anthonychilds8193
    @anthonychilds8193 Рік тому

    Underrated: the random sci-fi noises we add to describe the ease or difficulty at which something is achieved. The variety is endless and the fun factor of how nerdy we become for a millisecond is unlimited. Fun episode. Thanks, gents.

  • @ScottJWaldron
    @ScottJWaldron 3 роки тому

    I usually leave the hood out like Josh. I do use multi-coated filters (technically UV filters I guess), so I can avoid lens caps and easily wipe off the filter instead of touching the len's front element. Even coated filters can affect the image a bit, but they are significantly better than non-coated ones. It's all about convenience.

  • @AdamMuise
    @AdamMuise 2 роки тому

    Clear / UV filters for protection are a must have if you shoot beaches a lot. Sand gets on the surface of your lens and then you end up grinding off your coatings when you wipe your lens off.

  • @travisminneapolis
    @travisminneapolis Рік тому

    I use the lens hoods ALL the time if they come with one. Simply because it acts like a lens protector from me bumping and scratching the front element.
    So many times I've jammed the lens hood and yeah, it protects it.

  • @flochfitness
    @flochfitness 3 роки тому +8

    What a great topic I really like you guys discussing. This is honestly my most favorite video series on UA-cam!!!!

  • @innatemusic
    @innatemusic 3 роки тому

    Love these crossovers. It's like watching Law and Order SVU and then Stabler comes walking out of the shadows and we don't know if Benson is pissed or in love.

  • @clayviation
    @clayviation 3 роки тому

    I literally have those exact sound blankets in a box that just arrived to my house, after building a version of Curtis Judd’s setup for an upcoming film project in a brewery.

  • @devincorboy8638
    @devincorboy8638 2 роки тому

    Great conversations at "not a podcast!" This reminds me of the Marvel franchise theory. UA-camrs that you like and respect cross paths making a bigger universe! You are nailing it! Great job...

  • @BrianCatalano
    @BrianCatalano 3 роки тому

    Couldn't agree more with lense hoods, but like Josh, I'm mostly shooting video and looking for flares...and never near a hockey rink!

  • @MaxRideout
    @MaxRideout 2 роки тому

    Hehehe, I said "exactly" when you were talking about the usefulness/protection factor of lens hoods for photographers. Unless it's super cold out and the hood will cause heat distortion or I can't fit them in a case/bag for transport, I leave my lens hoods on all the time; it's so much more convenient than fidgeting with lens caps or constantly worrying about anything bumping the front element.

    • @MaxRideout
      @MaxRideout 2 роки тому

      Okay, also, it feels self-defeating that the other guy is arguing for parabolic softboxes, and pointing out that he's using three of them, while his lighting in this is... I mean, I was gonna try to say it kindly, but honestly, I think it's awful. Heavily side-lit with odd-angled, creepy shadows on the face is not a setup I'd go for in this scenario, and seems like it could be achieved with, ya know, a $20 floor lamp or an open window. 😅

  • @AllenCavedo
    @AllenCavedo 3 роки тому

    I bring four large Vocal Booth to Go sound blankets with me to any job I do that uses an interior space. I place them on the floor under and behind talent or sometimes hanging from C-Stands. Makes a huge difference in sound quality. Moving pads are close to useless as sound blankets. Real sound blankets have acoustic ratings for absorbing certain frequencies of sound. I once had all four blankets on the hardwood floor of a historic space we used for a Hollywood film BTS. When I walked onto the center of the blankets there was an obvious reduction of building noise, it was like a cone of silence lowered over my head. Quite a quiet experience. BTW, I have been told by clients that I am the only Mixer they have ever seen use sound blankets on location. Good way to up your game.

  • @EnriqueAviles
    @EnriqueAviles 3 роки тому +1

    Give it up for Curtis Judd! Also... Josh looks so much like young Bruce Campbell

  • @codythep
    @codythep 3 роки тому +1

    I love when I’m already a customer of the sponsor so I can skip the add with no guilt.

  • @Kjetika
    @Kjetika 3 роки тому +2

    love it guys! Good stuff!. "not a podcast" is so underrated!

  • @olsonspeed
    @olsonspeed 3 роки тому

    Nice collaboration, good to hear two points of view on gear uses and utility.

  • @joeygwood
    @joeygwood 3 роки тому +1

    I'll back Gerald up on parabolic softboxes being overrated. An octagonal softbox will give you the same results and it's not as big or heavy.