The Islands at the Louisville Zoo | Exhibit Tours Ep. 23

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @ZooTours
    @ZooTours Рік тому +5

    These keep getting better and better.

  • @skittlezzz0014
    @skittlezzz0014 Рік тому

    Definitely one of my favorite exhibits at the Louisville Zoo

  • @JacobFiveash
    @JacobFiveash Рік тому +2

    I love your videos, Derek. And to answer your question, I love rotational habitats. And speaking of which, The Birmingham Zoo just added a second habitat for their De Brazza’s monkeys.

  • @chasechristophermurraydola9314

    I really like the question and the answer is I do like rotational habitats because like it’s a surprise to find a different in the habitats that you usually see a different animal in.

  • @jk3letsgo
    @jk3letsgo Рік тому +1

    You might want to check out Indian Creek Zoo Lambertville Michigan

  • @aaaydenwetsell
    @aaaydenwetsell Рік тому

    9:30 did you say HYBRID ORANGUTAINS! HOW DID THAT HAPPEN??!!!!!!!

    • @DereksZooVideos0118
      @DereksZooVideos0118  Рік тому +2

      Great question, according to the Louisville Zoo's website, Teak and Amber were both born in 1987, which is 9 years before Orangutans were first split into subspecies in 1996. So, at the time they were born all Orangutans were just considered Orangutans. I assume genetic testing was done later, and it was discovered they are part Bornean and part Sumatran. The Milwaukee Zoo is another zoo I am aware of that labels their Orangutans as hybrids.

    • @aaaydenwetsell
      @aaaydenwetsell Рік тому

      @@DereksZooVideos0118 oh, i did not know that.

    • @dororexgaming4205
      @dororexgaming4205 Рік тому

      @@DereksZooVideos0118 even more receently, some of Zoo Atlanta's orangutans(some which where thought to be pure bornean) ended up being bornean x tapanuli orangutan hybrids and they even found some tribrids (bornean x sumatran x tapanuli). Unfortunate but you can't blame the AZA when the Tapanuli Oranguatan was only named as a third species in 2017.

    • @DereksZooVideos0118
      @DereksZooVideos0118  Рік тому +1

      @@dororexgaming4205 Fascinating! I wasn't aware of that, thanks for sharing!

  • @maikhenrich5879
    @maikhenrich5879 Рік тому +1

    I guess it depends for me on the species if rotation makes sense. Tigers and siamangs for example have such different demands on enclosure design that an enclosure, which both species can use, will always be a compromise that fits neither of them really well.

    • @DereksZooVideos0118
      @DereksZooVideos0118  Рік тому +1

      That's a good point. The first habitat where I saw the Tiger and Tapir, for example, is very rocky on the right side. Good for the Tiger, but I doubt the Tapir ever climbs up there.

  • @TheRandomZooVisitor
    @TheRandomZooVisitor Рік тому

    My opinion on rotational exhibits are that they are fine BUT only if there are enough outdoor spaces to accomodate all animals in the rotation

    • @DereksZooVideos0118
      @DereksZooVideos0118  Рік тому

      Good point! The Louisville Zoo's page of Rotational Exhibits does mention that they try to have BTS spaces that are comparable in size to the public exhibits for their rotational animals, but whether these spaces are inside or outside I don't know.

  • @jk3letsgo
    @jk3letsgo Рік тому +2

    Nobody does zoo like you

  • @jonasmeijer6177
    @jonasmeijer6177 Рік тому

    Gibbons are a small great ape species