To chyba lista poboznych życzeń - Amerykanie niech najpierw dopracują Abramsa M1A2 sep.v3. A ten Abrams X podobnie jak niemiecka Pantera to na razie są na etapie jak kiedyś Concept PL-01
Hi how did you make that tank in build a boat I’m making a leopard 2A7 , Wiesel 1A2, Tiger 1, M4A1 FL10 and Panhard E.B.R 105 in build a boat for treasure
Yes indeed. I think whoever created this slightly odd video (no Centurion??) confused the Anglo-German EKE project, which is linked with the Black Prince upgrade for the Chally 2, with the Franco-German MGCS partnership. Having said that, it's quite likely that the UK will join MGCS, and pretty soon (if allowed ;)
Franco/German took the best of both tanks the 4 seconds autoloader, optics, armor and delayed smoke gun of the Leclerc Turret with the hull, engine, gearbox and configuration of the german Leopard 2. And obviously name it Charlemagne 1 instead of EMBT
All modern tanks have more or less the same features at this point. The rankings seem rather arbitrary. The 99A is rank 15, but the VT4, its inferior export variant, is in rank 13?
Рейтинг довольно сумбурный . так как современная война показала что все танки умирают от Дронов собранных на коленках . что супер израильский танк дохнет от тандемного боеприпаса и что танк рассчитан только на климат и местность усредненно похожую на израильскую. И то что смешная сетка на российских танках в начале войны сейчас очень не смешная и хорошо работает против Дронов . и есть фото где на леопарды Челленджер и меркаву приделывают сетки на крышу.
@@Фибоначчи-я9сyes I find it weird how people made fun of Russia for using cages on tanks, as it’s a smart idea. Israel had a huge design flaw with Merkava being way to big for Gaza as to why it got broken down. Only five Merkava mark four were destroyed so that not a big number
So how do you know he doesn't know what he's talking about if you admit you don't know anything about tanks? Sounds like someone's a little butt hurt thier favorite tank wasn't #1
It doesn't change the fact that the leopard is one of the best lol your t90ms are also burning in the same way and some have even lunched their turrets the fact is the t90m will never be as survival as the abrams Or the leopard 2a7 or 8 if they don't move away from the carousel auto loader @@АлексейИванов-ъ3ч2ш
man, in this video it says that there are only 20 pieces of T-14 armata. Russia had 20 pieces of armat in 2015. And at the moment there are more than 300 of them. The author is just a fool.
This is american Fanboy, abrams x is 1 when not even prototype 0 combat obv, kf51 same xD t90m if i remember num 17 kekw and t14 7 when is probably top1-2 but well normal m1a2 is better joke obv for what? Have sep? Sad armata has more protection x)
Considering how many of these tanks have never been proven in combat it kinda an unbalanced assessment. Only a few Russian/ Soviet tanks and American Abrams have faced other in protracted combat. At least in the last twenty years.
@@hessherman717 Compared to what? A T-90? Yes. A Kf 51? No. And for tanks, it always depends on your surroundings and your enemy so you can't just put them all together
fucking hilarious that people keep repeating "t-14 does not exist" then tout about how good the abramx X the EMBT the panther and the challenger 3 is when they literally dont exist.
i guess thats backed by "are able to produce and maintain" if russia would be able to make them, they would. but since they buy their sights from europe (well not anymore lel) they arent even capable to build their tanks in the qualtity from 20 years ago
The amount of tank experts and engineers in these comments is mindblowing. Makes me wonder why you dont make your own vids in the "right" order. Im sure nobody will shit on it with thier own opinions of expertise.
Good video overall. I've seen other videos that compared the KF51 Panther and Abrams X there definitely comparable, but KF51 had better protection, a missle launcher, and a bigger main gun with more range and lethality they both use the latest electrics with AI and open-systems that can be upgraded the Abrams X did have a hybrid engine that the Panther didn't but we'll see soon enough both great tanks also I believe the EMBT is a joint German/French tank not British
@TR3B black manta who cares if I'm making a comparison? When new products come out, comparisons are going to be made regardless of what side they are on! It's not always about one being necessarily better. Sometimes, one may be better in certain environments or types of missions! There's many joint exercises where many Western tanks and other types of military equipment are compared, and they are all on the same side! So you implying that we shouldn't compare them because they are both NATO doesn't make sense!
@@Patriot-290 until WW1 or WW2 happens. look you don't who will be on your side in a war like that. who will say US and Soviet Union are on the same team against Germany back in the day. but today US and Germany are on the same team against Russia. time will change everything. maybe in WW3 Russia and Germany might fight against USA who knows maybe cox of nord stream pipelines. anything could happen
Larger bullet doesn't mean better range though, the shell must be large enough to store more energy for the bullet to travel further due to increased mass, and idk abt what shells will panther use
@Plasticide True, but according to videos of the KF51 Panther, the 130 mill main gun does have much greater range than the current 120 on the M1 and Leopold
As always, one marketing, tanks have not yet been tested, even 1 Prototype tank did not participate in real battles, but they are already being put in high places, many countries had 1 Prototype tank and as we know from history, they remained in several copies and did not go into mass series for various reasons. But now in the business world, the main thing is to show a beautiful picture, a candy wrapper, in which there is not the most delicious filling and sell it to a stupid person or inspire him with it.
@@olivertomas1486 doesn't make sense since there are quite a few of those around. Take a look again. They're simply not deployed because the aps isn't up to spec.
@@Thurgosh_OG the t-14 has a firing gun..... installed electronics.... leaterly anti heat coting...... working engine......how would it be off plastic and most of the tanks he put are not battel proven specially the Leo 2 and the K2 and even the Abrams only fought extremely outdated enemies
Ah, yes, T-84 Oplot - the only modern MBT that has less models left home (3) than sold to other countries and made from 2 older tanks (T-64 and T-80) disassembled and welded together.
@@Kruegernator123 Such a pinnacle, much wow. If cutting two soviet era tanks in half, welding them together and slapping on top of this pile of shit slightly modified era from 80's is a "pinnacle of design", why aren't Abrams and Leopard made the same way? Oh, I know! Because their engineers aren't bunch of drunk greedy idiots who are willing to do anything to sell their inbred creation to some naive fools. If Oplots were so great, why were all of them sold abroad?
how the T-14 Armata isn't in the top 3 is baffling lmao and it's in service, top 3 in video aren't even close to service. Also idk how the T-90M Proryv isn't in the top 5.
@@danielefabbro822 This “heap of crap” T-14 is already participating in battles, and darned condoms like Leopard and Challenger burn like candles, and they are afraid to release liquid Abrams crap to the front at all🤣🤣🤣
@@danielefabbro822 Russians don’t need this, and Ukrainians only write videos about their victories. No victories - no video. And there is a good joke about propaganda - Russian tank crews are sitting on the turret of their tank in Paris, drinking vodka and saying, “But we still lost the information war.”🤣🤣🤣
I don’t quit understand why Abraham’s x is in first place, when the embt and pantherkf51(130mm>120mm) isn‘t developed yet. Also, france and Germany wanted to build a new tank in 2035 - 2040 (I think it’s the embt, so Britain dont is in this project) and much more things will come up by other nations or are planned. Only my point of view, nice Video!
Abrams* named after General Creighton Abrams, not because it's owned by a biblical figure / Britain is* not* in this project (the expression "don't is" does not exist)
@@4tbf616 The Brits and their hangers-on kept going on and on about it having never been lost in combat, without understanding that they had yet to encounter a worthy adversary with it.
@@cinoeye they got part of it right and that was that the M-84 is not one of the top 40 most powerful mats that's for sure! It is just a slightly upgraded T-72 export model
@@eos716 выпустили всего 2 орла, и у них реально 152 мм, в Википедии написано. И Т-95 которого тоже выпустили 2 экземпляра, и у него тоже 152 мм. Даже арматам хотят дать 152 мм
They made it to protect against top-attack missiles. A waste of time, obviously. The thing that stopped other threads was a kind of side factor. Also, it protects against DRONE-DROPPED GRENADES. They didn't know about the suicide FPV drone's existence.
Топ-3 и Армата - это прототипы. Леклерк - очень дорогой танк, но он хорош, он гораздо лучше Абрамса также хорош корейский Чёрная Пантера многие считают это лучшим танком в мире. Эти танки из стран которые никогда не были лучшими в танкостроении. Отдельно стоит Меркава - это самый защищённый танк в мире. Ну и конечно Т-90, Абрамс М1А2 , Леопард 2А7, китайский тип 99. Это танки воевавшие или воевавшие их более ранние версии в общем сделанные на проверенной в боях надёжной отработанной платформе. А вот Челленджер - это танк который выглядит хорошо на рекламном постере с его списком красивых характеристик, а в реальности - постоянно ломающееся говно. Вот эти танки и есть Топ-10. Я искренне не понимаю как 40 место- это Т-64, а 39- Леопард1. Леопард -1 может ровняться только с Т-62, Т-64 это танк следующего поколения. Леопард -2 вышел как ответ на танки Т-64/72. А то что Т-90 стоит ниже чем малазийские, индийские или пакистанские танки - это вообще глупость несусветная 😂😂😂. Где Т-80БВМ? Он такой же почти как Т-90, только с 1200 сильным газотурбинным двигателем. Он очень быстрый
Ну что ты еще ожидал от автора, который по ходу американец. Сам себя не похвалишь - никто не похвалит. Да и Меркава - самый защищенный танк? Не сказал бы. Двигатель прикрыт тонкой (в сравнении с современными танками) броней, которая еще и не композитная. Двигатель расположен только с одной стороны, а с другой - мехвод. Если лом попадет в двигатель, то да, те 2м "брони" спасут экипаж. А вот если попадет со стороны мехвода - пробьет весь танк навылет (и еще несколько стоящих позади). Если фугас прилетит в маску башни, то проломит верх танка и не только поломает двигатель, но и экипаж новый понадобится.
@@DeLoreaN_S ну это тоже - такое. С чего вдруг она самая лучшая? Как говорят авиаконструкторы: если в самолёте больше (емнип)30% новых деталей, то он не полетит. А Армата на более чем 90% из новых деталей. В общем сырая и м кучей детских болезней. А вот Т-90М - прорыв, это безусловно на данный момент лучший танк в России и один из лучших в мире. В чëм то уступает другим лидерам, а в чем- то превосходит.
@@ИльяЧендемеров ну вряд ли американцы в этом плане будут не правы, если даже они признали армату лучшим и такое вполне возможно не обитаемая башня мощная защита все передовые системы, но опять же я в этом не разбираюсь, просто очень странно что американцы не поставили топ 1 свой абрамс, а именно армату Я думаю на это есть причины
6:26 the Т84 is not in the service of the Ukrainian army. It could not be produced. The plan was drawn up in 2021 and not in 2009 ((if I'm not mistaken)) A total of 4 tanks were invented. As I noted, They were not put into production.
The T-84 is in service in Ukraine, and has seen fighting, including a report of one being damaged by a Lancet drone (however it's unconfirmed if it was a T-84 or T-80BVM). The T-84 Oplot-M, however, hasn't entered service. I believe that's the one that never got produced.
I have a book( From 1976) wrote by an American Military Analist that served in WW2 on a Armored Division equipped with the M4 Sherman as a gunner. And the subject of the book is a comparison between ww2 tanks and modern Tanks ( this in 1976). The Man had plenty of combat experience,from Normandy,The battle of the Bulge and some Minor engagements until the end of the war. Its a very good book despite being 50 years old,a awesome research with factual data with Numbers,facts, used Technology and Specifications of dozens of diferent Tank models used in WW2 and the same abaut the new ( 1976) Tanks from different nations. Its an Excelente book. This to say that in a part where he talks abaut he's personal experience during WW2, specialy when he had to face German Armor,he ( like many other Western Historians, Military Analists or even many Veterans accounts put into books) is very direct and Honest when says that the German Tanks were far superior to anything the Allies had at the time. He talks abaut the mythical expression "Tiger Terror" among allied tank crews, if was real or if was a bad joke. And he says that was very real and always present,but not concerning only the Tiger but any other German Tank like the Panther or even their Tank Destroyers like the StugIII, Because any allied tank crew after 2 weeks in Normandy already knew how Powerfull and Superior the German Guns were in relation to what the Allies had to face them. It was the realization that afterall "We were deceived while in Armor School where they told us that we had the best tanks in the world,and only after 2 weeks we unfortunably found out that was not true,the German Tanks were the Best ones by a long shot". Ps: just to end,another thought that i think is fascinaiting is when he mention that the Tiger II or KingTiger was still capable to face many of the modern ( until 1976) main Battle Tanks in a close and fair fight,because of the Armor and that Powerfull 8,8 cm kwk 43 main gun,that despite having a smaller calibre compared with modern tanks is sheer muzzle velocity can penetrate most of the modern main tanks frontal hull armor ( not the frontal turret)at 1000 meters and the Turret sides,not to mention the rear. And for a tank from 1944 after 30 years of inovation still able to give a very good fight on a 1976 main battle Tank its a testament to how really good some WW2 were.
The Altay tank is a downgraded version made with the Korean K2 tank license. Above k2? You made a ranking without basic knowledge and information. Moreover, the KF51, which has not even been mass-produced, is number three? Even if it's nonsense, to some extent.
Insgesamt ein gutes Video aber ich meine eher das der KF 51 Panther stärker ist als der abrams x und das Modell wo du verwendet hast für den KF 51 Panther war nicht der panzer sondern der neuste schützenpanzer lynx 120 und der embt ist ein deutsch französische Projekt sorry, my cell phone didn't want to translate correctly, now you get it in German
@@jlbrbarrios5973 of course most of this is just made-up propaganda. Weapon systems nowadays can penetrate everything so it doesn't matter the armor and protective systems, what matters are 3 key factors: mobility, firepower and good sensors. Russia lacks of sensors. America lacks on firepower. German lacks on mobility. But propaganda makes everything looks good. Despite you see destroyed Leopard 2 everywhere, they have always an excuse. Usually is: "it's not made to operate in such environments". So we must think that such tanks are precisely made to operate in the specific environment of Eurosatory and the other "tank festivals" where the big money are stolen from the pockets of the poor people. Simple as it is.
4:02 into the video: the longest tank on tank kill was not with an APSFDS round. It was with e HESH round! And placing the japanese Type 90 24th while the Leopard 2 is 29th makes no sense as the Leopard 2A4 and the Type 90 are basically the same tank, only with few diffences. 9:19 the Leopard 2A7+ is shown with an L44 gun. This is incorrect, as the last Leopard to have the short (L44) gun, was the 2A5. From the version 2A6 onwards they have only the longer L55 gun.
Меркава 3 это вообще странный танк, скорее всего так просто было логичнее разместить башню (ведь на Меркава 1 было другое расположение, которое видимо было плохим) так что в новой версии они просто учли этот факт и поменяли положение башни.
@@WhatShould_I_WriteHere What an ignorant idiot.... merkava has same system at the back of it has clamshell hatch for escape and the engine is not right side and front of a driver
A very biased opinion not to say ridiculous. The most advanced tank in the world in use in 7th place and the first three places are tanks that are at the level of the model. Of course number 1 must be from the USA.
K2 was created by stealing german french and american tech its a knockoff of the leopard, leclerc and abrahams combined. The engine is a mtu knockoff. I bet that it stands on equal footing with those three exept for protection.
![Gigantic!: Abrams, Leopard, Challenger & Leclerc, [All The Best of Tanks in Action]](/img/n.gif)
The title should be: random tanks placed in random order
no, it should be "top 40 tanks in the world in chronological order."
lit
True
Joe Biden ranked
To chyba lista poboznych życzeń - Amerykanie niech najpierw dopracują Abramsa M1A2 sep.v3. A ten Abrams X podobnie jak niemiecka Pantera to na razie są na etapie jak kiedyś Concept PL-01
The T-90M weighs 48 tons, not 68
Me Merkava also uses a 120mm as far as I know
51/52 tons
Да рейтинг вообще не верный, с потолка все танки разбросали, некоторых вообще не существует, только чертежи ещё на бумаге
It's because Ivan has been eating a lot of potato lately
no it weighs 90million tons (its obvious look at the name)
Fun fact: on 11:33 , this tank is actually Franco-German cooperation for the EMBT. Its not Franco-british.
Hi how did you make that tank in build a boat I’m making a leopard 2A7 , Wiesel 1A2, Tiger 1, M4A1 FL10 and Panhard E.B.R 105 in build a boat for treasure
@@Runxiachen huh
@@Stevenxr24He meant how to make the tank in your BABFT pfp
EMBT is not UK/France cooperation, it's a German/France made Battle Tank, it's a futuristic Leclerc Turret with a modernized Leopard 2 Hull. :)
And he missed out the Leopard 2A8
Yes indeed. I think whoever created this slightly odd video (no Centurion??) confused the Anglo-German EKE project, which is linked with the Black Prince upgrade for the Chally 2, with the Franco-German MGCS partnership. Having said that, it's quite likely that the UK will join MGCS, and pretty soon (if allowed ;)
Franco/German took the best of both tanks the 4 seconds autoloader, optics, armor and delayed smoke gun of the Leclerc Turret with the hull, engine, gearbox and configuration of the german Leopard 2. And obviously name it Charlemagne 1 instead of EMBT
German/French* made ...
@№@@Ingens_Scherz
У Т-90М масса 68 тонн, вы откуда взяли эти цыфры?!?!?
Этот аффтар красиво рисует, но данные не проверяет и во многих его роликах масса ошибок.
USA on top, thanks for your hate comments you just typed😂.
@@Ojtheking12what hate comment Amerimutt?
@@Ojtheking12 Они топ для гранатомётчиков, пингвинёнок
@@Ojtheking12🤡
All modern tanks have more or less the same features at this point.
The rankings seem rather arbitrary. The 99A is rank 15, but the VT4, its inferior export variant, is in rank 13?
This ranking is bullsh*t
Рейтинг довольно сумбурный . так как современная война показала что все танки умирают от Дронов собранных на коленках . что супер израильский танк дохнет от тандемного боеприпаса и что танк рассчитан только на климат и местность усредненно похожую на израильскую. И то что смешная сетка на российских танках в начале войны сейчас очень не смешная и хорошо работает против Дронов . и есть фото где на леопарды Челленджер и меркаву приделывают сетки на крышу.
@@Фибоначчи-я9сyes I find it weird how people made fun of Russia for using cages on tanks, as it’s a smart idea. Israel had a huge design flaw with Merkava being way to big for Gaza as to why it got broken down. Only five Merkava mark four were destroyed so that not a big number
@@17denbythey didn't manage to destroy a single Merkava in the current war. There were several damaged but they were recovered and repaired.
Досмотрел до конца видео-в танках автор разбирается ,как я в балете(понятия не имею)
А он просто рассудил: чем новее, тем лучше
@@МихаилЗуев-м7я Да глупо вообще танки сравнивать, которые не показывали себя в реальной высокоинтенсивной войне с равным противником.
@@NimroVieronну так и есть. В топе т90 где-то по середине, а в реальности показал, что гораздо сильнее леопарда 2 и Челленджера 2
So how do you know he doesn't know what he's talking about if you admit you don't know anything about tanks? Sounds like someone's a little butt hurt thier favorite tank wasn't #1
я когда в начале ролика увидел,что лео 1 и всякая помойка выше т-64,я уже скипнул ахахах
i think best top 3 tank is leopard 2A7, K2 blackpanther, M1A2 sep
Don’t underrate the challenger👀
Леопарды горят как кучи соломы этим летом, то еще гавно
@@АлексейИванов-ъ3ч2ш Russian Propaganda.
It doesn't change the fact that the leopard is one of the best lol your t90ms are also burning in the same way and some have even lunched their turrets the fact is the t90m will never be as survival as the abrams Or the leopard 2a7 or 8 if they don't move away from the carousel auto loader @@АлексейИванов-ъ3ч2ш
@@АлексейИванов-ъ3ч2шUkraine didn't get the leopard 2a7
T-90M 68 tonnes?
Are you sure?!?
man, in this video it says that there are only 20 pieces of T-14 armata. Russia had 20 pieces of armat in 2015. And at the moment there are more than 300 of them. The author is just a fool.
This is american Fanboy, abrams x is 1 when not even prototype 0 combat obv, kf51 same xD t90m if i remember num 17 kekw and t14 7 when is probably top1-2 but well normal m1a2 is better joke obv for what? Have sep? Sad armata has more protection x)
Yes maybe because 48 ton weight is just the weight with no fuel, crew and ammo
@@NikitaBuyanov-gm1hmOn what planet are there 300 Armatas?
Considering how many of these tanks have never been proven in combat it kinda an unbalanced assessment. Only a few Russian/ Soviet tanks and American Abrams have faced other in protracted combat. At least in the last twenty years.
Leopards? Merkavas?
merkava destroy a lot of t-62
American Tank is superior
@@hessherman717 Compared to what? A T-90? Yes. A Kf 51? No. And for tanks, it always depends on your surroundings and your enemy so you can't just put them all together
@@torvidbente7889 American Tank is superior.
fucking hilarious that people keep repeating "t-14 does not exist" then tout about how good the abramx X the EMBT the panther and the challenger 3 is when they literally dont exist.
"uM tHeYrE pRtOtYpE 🤓"
i guess thats backed by "are able to produce and maintain" if russia would be able to make them, they would. but since they buy their sights from europe (well not anymore lel) they arent even capable to build their tanks in the qualtity from 20 years ago
The top secret is the funniest part of the entire video itself
The top secret cow 😂
The amount of tank experts and engineers in these comments is mindblowing. Makes me wonder why you dont make your own vids in the "right" order. Im sure nobody will shit on it with thier own opinions of expertise.
I kinda get your point but there is no debate in the fact that this rating is absolute dogfood and that it is stating facts that just are not true
Where is the C1 Ariete??🤔🤔🤔
Good video overall. I've seen other videos that compared the KF51 Panther and Abrams X there definitely comparable, but KF51 had better protection, a missle launcher, and a bigger main gun with more range and lethality they both use the latest electrics with AI and open-systems that can be upgraded the Abrams X did have a hybrid engine that the Panther didn't but we'll see soon enough both great tanks also I believe the EMBT is a joint German/French tank not British
Who cares about Which one is better? They are both western tanks so they will both fight against the same enemies
@TR3B black manta who cares if I'm making a comparison? When new products come out, comparisons are going to be made regardless of what side they are on! It's not always about one being necessarily better. Sometimes, one may be better in certain environments or types of missions! There's many joint exercises where many Western tanks and other types of military equipment are compared, and they are all on the same side! So you implying that we shouldn't compare them because they are both NATO doesn't make sense!
@@Patriot-290 until WW1 or WW2 happens. look you don't who will be on your side in a war like that. who will say US and Soviet Union are on the same team against Germany back in the day. but today US and Germany are on the same team against Russia. time will change everything. maybe in WW3 Russia and Germany might fight against USA who knows maybe cox of nord stream pipelines. anything could happen
Larger bullet doesn't mean better range though, the shell must be large enough to store more energy for the bullet to travel further due to increased mass, and idk abt what shells will panther use
@Plasticide True, but according to videos of the KF51 Panther, the 130 mill main gun does have much greater range than the current 120 on the M1 and Leopold
As always, one marketing, tanks have not yet been tested, even 1 Prototype tank did not participate in real battles, but they are already being put in high places, many countries had 1 Prototype tank and as we know from history, they remained in several copies and did not go into mass series for various reasons. But now in the business world, the main thing is to show a beautiful picture, a candy wrapper, in which there is not the most delicious filling and sell it to a stupid person or inspire him with it.
2:25
The Taiwanese President and her pet black bear showing Winnie the Pooh their tank.. 😂😆🤣👍
8:20 the Leclerc XLR keep his120mm canon not a 125mm
How did this list come up? Like, only the merkava and t14 have working hard kill systems. The rest are still in testing, with questionable results
The Armata doesn’t even exist. It’s like a unicorn, or the tooth fairy. Lol.
@@olivertomas1486 doesn't make sense since there are quite a few of those around. Take a look again. They're simply not deployed because the aps isn't up to spec.
The Armata doesn’t have a working engine.
One thing is for sure, the UA-camr is British man.
It's only funny that Challenger, who is about to be retired in the U.K., is at the top of the list.
Yup that’s the thing about these. They’re really biased towards the country they like
the Challenger was never defeated in combat, in ukraine it was defeated by AT weapons not other tanks so the ranking is at least a little accurate
How the hell would you put the Abrams X wich don't exist next to non existing tanks while t-14 didn't even reach the top 5?
Because the T14 is an untested tank, that could be made of plastic. I agree that 'paper' tanks should not be in the list though.
@@Thurgosh_OG the t-14 has a firing gun..... installed electronics.... leaterly anti heat coting...... working engine......how would it be off plastic and most of the tanks he put are not battel proven specially the Leo 2 and the K2 and even the Abrams only fought extremely outdated enemies
bro thent 14 is also an non existing tank which were only used at parades an is "too expensive to be used in ukraine"
@@pasha12603
it has working complete models..... Abrams x and other tanks are only a mock up
Both the abram X and the t14 shouldn't even be on the top 20 one is just a technology demonstrator and the other one has not joined service
Ah, yes, T-84 Oplot - the only modern MBT that has less models left home (3) than sold to other countries and made from 2 older tanks (T-64 and T-80) disassembled and welded together.
Абсолютно так. Мистер трясучка должен быть на 40 месте или вообще отсутствовать в этом топе
It was good then any other soviet tanks and even better then Russian t72 and had a great reverse speed with a bustle auto loader
The Oplot is the pinnacle of Soviet tank design. Certainly better than the T-72BU- err, I mean T-90.
@@Kruegernator123 Such a pinnacle, much wow. If cutting two soviet era tanks in half, welding them together and slapping on top of this pile of shit slightly modified era from 80's is a "pinnacle of design", why aren't Abrams and Leopard made the same way? Oh, I know! Because their engineers aren't bunch of drunk greedy idiots who are willing to do anything to sell their inbred creation to some naive fools. If Oplots were so great, why were all of them sold abroad?
Doesn't make much sense as a T-80 is a T-64 turret with a heavily T-72 inspired hull.
Possibly the worst tank comparison I have ever seen.
Not sure why the A-10 Warthog isn't listed? Just because it flies it's still a MBT with most kills and has never been knocked out!
10:52 - Why is a soldier with a Kalashnikov standing near the British Challenger 2?
It's was captured by Putin 😢
А возле французкого танка стоит солдат с китайским флагом
Танк трофейный
I love the russian T series....72, 90 in particular
They have a very special feature.....their turret flies of towards space....😂
Absolutely love the GATE reference with the Type 74
We all know that the Panther is completly dominating the battlefield.
Omly theory
t-34 v2 will destroy it lmao
@@zulfanirich7594the phanter tank fails itself
People realy are so blinded by german tanks...
featless tank dominates the battlefield?
how the T-14 Armata isn't in the top 3 is baffling lmao and it's in service, top 3 in video aren't even close to service. Also idk how the T-90M Proryv isn't in the top 5.
You mean that after ten years of developing, that pile of crap is finally working? Awesome!
@@danielefabbro822 This “heap of crap” T-14 is already participating in battles, and darned condoms like Leopard and Challenger burn like candles, and they are afraid to release liquid Abrams crap to the front at all🤣🤣🤣
@@irinachernova6272 it's strange because there are no footages about the T14 "piece of crap" in battle. 🤣🤣🤣
Good old propaganda.
@@danielefabbro822 Russians don’t need this, and Ukrainians only write videos about their victories. No victories - no video. And there is a good joke about propaganda - Russian tank crews are sitting on the turret of their tank in Paris, drinking vodka and saying, “But we still lost the information war.”🤣🤣🤣
Because it’s shit?
TIFON 2A Where is?
Is a Ukrainian -peruvian tank even better than oplot
I don’t quit understand why Abraham’s x is in first place, when the embt and pantherkf51(130mm>120mm) isn‘t developed yet. Also, france and Germany wanted to build a new tank in 2035 - 2040 (I think it’s the embt, so Britain dont is in this project) and much more things will come up by other nations or are planned. Only my point of view, nice Video!
Abrams* named after General Creighton Abrams, not because it's owned by a biblical figure / Britain is* not* in this project (the expression "don't is" does not exist)
T 14 Armata is the best tank, it should be in the first place
no it is not
@@jacksongaming5666Yes
@@jacksongaming5666 Blud does not know about kf 52 panther ,💀☠️💀☠️💀
Agree
Total BS. Untested unicorn tank. The Russians are obviously afraid of sending it to the frontline in Ukraine because it's all a make believe tank..
Challenger 2 is no longer undefeated 😂
True, but maned by an Ukranian crew ? not BRITISH.
@@miketrevarrow9795какая разница
Wow, its almost as if... When war happens, equipment is destroyed! Jeez, didnt realize that!
@@miketrevarrow9795 pretty british man wouldnt make a deference agaisnt arty or kornets
@@4tbf616 The Brits and their hangers-on kept going on and on about it having never been lost in combat, without understanding that they had yet to encounter a worthy adversary with it.
Altay is a license copy of K2. How can possibly think a copy version is better than original version hahaha
Man definitely some hilarious references in this video 😂. Earned yourself a subscriber!
Why hilarious,?
@@marianoprado5652 Like Winnie the Pooh; a reference to Xi Yinping
The best tank T-14 Armata 12 km radius of attack and 90 km/s , 48 tons .
It does not even exist yet.
@ZigmAM Watched what? The T-14 is stuck in the testing phase.
T-14 is only for parades😅
@@tomsvennblad8374приятно что вы так думаете
Everyone who is familiar with tanks wonders how did you overlook Yugoslavia’s m-84?!
M84 should be on list
because it is basically just a stock t55 and a stock t55 is not one of the top 40 most powerful mbts
@@almaricci2104 m84 stock t55?!? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You're dumb
M84 is upgraded version of T72
@@almaricci2104 you still have time to research and edit your comment. Otherwise you will be known like someone who has no idea about the tanks:)
@@cinoeye they got part of it right and that was that the M-84 is not one of the top 40 most powerful mats that's for sure! It is just a slightly upgraded T-72 export model
What about the Ariete?
Yeah
Man Western tanks could not even compare with Russian tanks till the 70s . How far have the mighty fallen...
but leopards 1, chieftains put above the revolutionary for its time T 64, it's just funny
Where AMX40?
1:18 Chieftain: ... was finally replaced by Challenger 1 in 1995. (Challenger in service from 1998)
Challenger 2.
And yes, Chieftain continued service into the 1990´s, when it was decomissioned.
Challenger 1 was introduced in the 80s
The Arjun is not the heaviest MBT. Thta would be either ther Challenger TES or M1A2 SEPV3. Both weigh nearly 80 tons.
Strv.103 is the first MBT that uses Gas Turbine, while T-80 is the first to use only Gas Turbine
wut
I don’t get it
Strv103 is the weirdest mbt cause it’s a casemate
@@RightTwixer Strv is like a hybrid Toyota Prius, T-80 is like a Tesla but instead of lithium battery it’s a gas turbine engine
Куча грамматических ошибок, и почему ты не расписал модели танков, по типу Leopard 1A5, Leopard 2A4, A6, A7
Altay's last design is different from this
nofuckign way this dude ranked the vt-4 over the ztz99a. no fucking way they ranked any challenger 2 in the top 20
Забыли добавить танк России "черный орёл и Т-95" Со 152 мм пушкой.
Конечно они еще прототипы, но и Абрамс x тоже
Орла не завезли ещё. И он не был со 152мм пушкой, был объект 292.
@@eos716 выпустили всего 2 орла, и у них реально 152 мм, в Википедии написано.
И Т-95 которого тоже выпустили 2 экземпляра, и у него тоже 152 мм.
Даже арматам хотят дать 152 мм
@@NewHoi4 Там же написано что его нет, а 292 был. 🤔🤔
@@eos716 скорее википеды ошиблись написав о 2 произведённых.
Многие де6илы просто считают что орел и т95 это один и тот же танк
@@NewHoi4 Мне кажется будущее не за ростом калибра, а за качеством снаряда. БОПСы летают уже под 1800 м/с.
Brush Altay is more better than k2?
And k1 is more better.than M1 Abrams? are you joking?
3:17 Cope cages were only effective to counter FPV drones, it protected the crew from dropped grenades from the drone itself.
They made it to protect against top-attack missiles. A waste of time, obviously.
The thing that stopped other threads was a kind of side factor. Also, it protects against DRONE-DROPPED GRENADES. They didn't know about the suicide FPV drone's existence.
@@marcinmaj848 I highly doubt they were made with Javelin missiles in mind.
@@andyfriederichsen The Russian tankers confirmed it started as a remedy against top attack ATGMs.
No.1 T14 amata
Топ-3 и Армата - это прототипы. Леклерк - очень дорогой танк, но он хорош, он гораздо лучше Абрамса также хорош корейский Чёрная Пантера многие считают это лучшим танком в мире. Эти танки из стран которые никогда не были лучшими в танкостроении. Отдельно стоит Меркава - это самый защищённый танк в мире. Ну и конечно Т-90, Абрамс М1А2 , Леопард 2А7, китайский тип 99. Это танки воевавшие или воевавшие их более ранние версии в общем сделанные на проверенной в боях надёжной отработанной платформе. А вот Челленджер - это танк который выглядит хорошо на рекламном постере с его списком красивых характеристик, а в реальности - постоянно ломающееся говно. Вот эти танки и есть Топ-10. Я искренне не понимаю как 40 место- это Т-64, а 39- Леопард1. Леопард -1 может ровняться только с Т-62, Т-64 это танк следующего поколения. Леопард -2 вышел как ответ на танки Т-64/72. А то что Т-90 стоит ниже чем малазийские, индийские или пакистанские танки - это вообще глупость несусветная 😂😂😂. Где Т-80БВМ? Он такой же почти как Т-90, только с 1200 сильным газотурбинным двигателем. Он очень быстрый
Ну что ты еще ожидал от автора, который по ходу американец. Сам себя не похвалишь - никто не похвалит.
Да и Меркава - самый защищенный танк? Не сказал бы. Двигатель прикрыт тонкой (в сравнении с современными танками) броней, которая еще и не композитная. Двигатель расположен только с одной стороны, а с другой - мехвод. Если лом попадет в двигатель, то да, те 2м "брони" спасут экипаж. А вот если попадет со стороны мехвода - пробьет весь танк навылет (и еще несколько стоящих позади). Если фугас прилетит в маску башни, то проломит верх танка и не только поломает двигатель, но и экипаж новый понадобится.
Там по годам сначала идет топ, а потом да, бредятина
Так сами американцы признали самым лучшим и современным танк Армата. Я хз где этот чел брал статистики
@@DeLoreaN_S ну это тоже - такое. С чего вдруг она самая лучшая? Как говорят авиаконструкторы: если в самолёте больше (емнип)30% новых деталей, то он не полетит. А Армата на более чем 90% из новых деталей. В общем сырая и м кучей детских болезней. А вот Т-90М - прорыв, это безусловно на данный момент лучший танк в России и один из лучших в мире. В чëм то уступает другим лидерам, а в чем- то превосходит.
@@ИльяЧендемеров ну вряд ли американцы в этом плане будут не правы, если даже они признали армату лучшим и такое вполне возможно не обитаемая башня мощная защита все передовые системы, но опять же я в этом не разбираюсь, просто очень странно что американцы не поставили топ 1 свой абрамс, а именно армату Я думаю на это есть причины
6:26 the Т84 is not in the service of the Ukrainian army. It could not be produced. The plan was drawn up in 2021 and not in 2009 ((if I'm not mistaken)) A total of 4 tanks were invented. As I noted, They were not put into production.
The T-84 is in service in Ukraine, and has seen fighting, including a report of one being damaged by a Lancet drone (however it's unconfirmed if it was a T-84 or T-80BVM).
The T-84 Oplot-M, however, hasn't entered service. I believe that's the one that never got produced.
nice girls und panzer reference
Where is the BOLO Mk. XII Continental Siege Unit?
Altai is a minor version of K2 with advanced parts removed.
abrams x is just technology demonstrator, not a produced tank
After the Ukraine war I doubt Russian tank capabilities
Challenger:💀
9:58 T 14 Armata is in 7th place😂😂😂, as expected from a sofa expert, at the moment the most powerful tank in the world and the latest in technology
Reported for misinformation
Lol
Kim tank the 3rd stood by his tank 😂. Just about fell off my chair backwards laughing so hard.
Is this in order?
That “majin-Un” at the end, got me😂😂
I have a book( From 1976) wrote by an American Military Analist that served in WW2 on a Armored Division equipped with the M4 Sherman as a gunner.
And the subject of the book is a comparison between ww2 tanks and modern Tanks ( this in 1976).
The Man had plenty of combat experience,from Normandy,The battle of the Bulge and some Minor engagements until the end of the war.
Its a very good book despite being 50 years old,a awesome research with factual data with Numbers,facts, used Technology and Specifications of dozens of diferent Tank models used in WW2 and the same abaut the new ( 1976) Tanks from different nations.
Its an Excelente book.
This to say that in a part where he talks abaut he's personal experience during WW2, specialy when he had to face German Armor,he ( like many other Western Historians, Military Analists or even many Veterans accounts put into books) is very direct and Honest when says that the German Tanks were far superior to anything the Allies had at the time.
He talks abaut the mythical expression "Tiger Terror" among allied tank crews, if was real or if was a bad joke.
And he says that was very real and always present,but not concerning only the Tiger but any other German Tank like the Panther or even their Tank Destroyers like the StugIII, Because any allied tank crew after 2 weeks in Normandy already knew how Powerfull and Superior the German Guns were in relation to what the Allies had to face them. It was the realization that afterall "We were deceived while in Armor School where they told us that we had the best tanks in the world,and only after 2 weeks we unfortunably found out that was not true,the German Tanks were the Best ones by a long shot".
Ps: just to end,another thought that i think is fascinaiting is when he mention that the Tiger II or KingTiger was still capable to face many of the modern ( until 1976) main Battle Tanks in a close and fair fight,because of the Armor and that Powerfull 8,8 cm kwk 43 main gun,that despite having a smaller calibre compared with modern tanks is sheer muzzle velocity can penetrate most of the modern main tanks frontal hull armor ( not the frontal turret)at 1000 meters and the Turret sides,not to mention the rear.
And for a tank from 1944 after 30 years of inovation still able to give a very good fight on a 1976 main battle Tank its a testament to how really good some WW2 were.
Challenger 2 is not a tank anymore which has never been destroyed.
Armata is a much more technologically advanced tank than any tanks in the top 10, why is it not at least in 4th place?..
Maybe because Russia lied about the systems they have on the tank, like the hard kill, soft kill, electronic warfare systems. Oh and it is shit
because it was never used in action and only shiwn in parads
2:05 man i love you
The Altay tank is a downgraded version made with the Korean K2 tank license. Above k2? You made a ranking without basic knowledge and information. Moreover, the KF51, which has not even been mass-produced, is number three? Even if it's nonsense, to some extent.
May need an update after this summer in Ukraine - I fear the Lepard 2 A4 will be downgraded
Well its a 1980s tank so it will perform just like one
Bro armat 14 is the best tank in the world
Даже после того как он заглох на параде?
Insgesamt ein gutes Video aber ich meine eher das der KF 51 Panther stärker ist als der abrams x und das Modell wo du verwendet hast für den KF 51 Panther war nicht der panzer sondern der neuste schützenpanzer lynx 120 und der embt ist ein deutsch französische Projekt
sorry, my cell phone didn't want to translate correctly, now you get it in German
The Abrams X may not even be made at all. We do not even know its entire specs and yet you placed it 1st? I feel the bias bro.
Т 90 м боевая масса 45,5 тонн. Но не 68
It's weight without any fuel, ammo and crew itself is 48 ton
Очень субъективный рейтинг тем не менее
Я согласен. Абрамс X - это всего лишь прототип. Ho он находится на первом месте.
@@jlbrbarrios5973 of course, you must know that everything made by America, Germany and Russia is ALWAYS on the top. Always.
@@jlbrbarrios5973 of course most of this is just made-up propaganda.
Weapon systems nowadays can penetrate everything so it doesn't matter the armor and protective systems, what matters are 3 key factors: mobility, firepower and good sensors.
Russia lacks of sensors.
America lacks on firepower.
German lacks on mobility.
But propaganda makes everything looks good.
Despite you see destroyed Leopard 2 everywhere, they have always an excuse. Usually is: "it's not made to operate in such environments".
So we must think that such tanks are precisely made to operate in the specific environment of Eurosatory and the other "tank festivals" where the big money are stolen from the pockets of the poor people.
Simple as it is.
Can someone explain the reference for #12 Leclerc XLR? I get 95% of the avatars but im missing this one.
Don't know ether
3:08 the "cope cage" isn't made to counter javelins, it is made to counter cheap drones with PG-7 grenade added to them with duct tape.
4:02 into the video: the longest tank on tank kill was not with an APSFDS round. It was with e HESH round!
And placing the japanese Type 90 24th while the Leopard 2 is 29th makes no sense as the Leopard 2A4 and the Type 90 are basically the same tank, only with few diffences.
9:19 the Leopard 2A7+ is shown with an L44 gun. This is incorrect, as the last Leopard to have the short (L44) gun, was the 2A5. From the version 2A6 onwards they have only the longer L55 gun.
the japanese tanks canot be rated well JSDF has really different needs normally 2A4 would be better
@@vojtakkojecky7765 that's what I basically said.
6:05 Russians: hold my shovel.
Russian shovel is made of Jedi lightsaber crystal
@@CCP-Lies Из палки и ржавого куска металла
I think the k2 black panther and the challenger are the best tanks
can you talk about Object 477 "NOTA" please
And why does the Merkava MK 3 have a tower located in the middle, and not in the stern?
Меркава 3 это вообще странный танк, скорее всего так просто было логичнее разместить башню (ведь на Меркава 1 было другое расположение, которое видимо было плохим) так что в новой версии они просто учли этот факт и поменяли положение башни.
@@WhatShould_I_WriteHere Haven't you seen an apc yet?
@@jamesedwardladislazerrudo1378 What the apc?
@@WhatShould_I_WriteHere What an ignorant idiot.... merkava has same system at the back of it has clamshell hatch for escape and the engine is not right side and front of a driver
10:00: So the t-14 Armata have "supersonic armor-piercing ammo"? Wow! Who can beat that?
Everyone know that the most powerful ta k in the world is the Leclerc terminateur, just a tank that shoot a 140mm apfsds every 5 sec
알타이의 원형은 한국의 k2입니다
That is just another version of the Leopard 2.
@@aegis9936 it's just another version of the Leopard 2.
@@aegis9936 Leopard. 🤣
레오파르트,에이브람스
지금 우크라이나 진흙탕속에서 수영하고 있답니다.
K2전차는 폴란드 진흑탕에서 탈출
Apparently UK Is The Country That Builds The Best Tanks
Post WW2, the UK and Germans have led in tank design.
Не понял как абрамс оказался сильнее Т-14 и челленджера с рентгеном..
Видимо кому-то денег занесли
Indeed
А вот так вот, арматы то не существует клоун, это просто поменяли корпус Т-72, опять в итоге всех обманули вас 😂
Так а кому ваша техника нужна? Только каким то террористам как вы 😂
@@zeri_men887 дай угадаю у Путина еще миллион двойников? И вообще России не существует, а существует только Московия?
@@zeri_men887 Скоро 404ой не будет.
This listing is full of faults.
For example Embt is a french german project.
Could go on and on..
2:30 As a Taiwanese, dawn bro
Armata is not a tank, it is just a truck
Kid got all his info from computer games 😂
Bro) t 14 arnata and abrams x its same tanks in different corpus
T-90M is tank #1 in the world. Numerous, effective, cheapest among competitors.
#1 turret space program
@@wellhello9440 Leopard shells nearby driver be like😂
@@vova_ermak *looking at Chechnya and Iraq war*
#1 worst tank ever thats just pice of junk that can by destroyed by toy gun... ah and its 'gun' cant penetrate even paper
@@RobloxPlayer--hu7fq🤡
T-14 "Sramota" - Shame.
The"Godzilla Favorite Tank" came from nowhere. But atleast I am a Godzilla fan.
How is the sweden tank destroyer MBs in this video?
I do think that the leopard 2 is the best mbt for Ukraine its takes way less maintenance and training then the Abrams or the challenger 2.
I agree, Leopard 2 for Ukraine, this is exactly the separation of the turret
It won't help them.
@@eos716 so it is, but in my comment there is a veiled joke about Leopards on Ukraine)
@@jeleznyakov Башни крутятся - лавэха мутится.
А я считаю , что даже Звезда смерти не поможет украинскому нацизму.
A very biased opinion not to say ridiculous. The most advanced tank in the world in use in 7th place and the first three places are tanks that are at the level of the model. Of course number 1 must be from the USA.
Altay was created based on K2 as its minor version. The overall performance is closed to K1A1.
K2 was created by stealing german french and american tech its a knockoff of the leopard, leclerc and abrahams combined. The engine is a mtu knockoff. I bet that it stands on equal footing with those three exept for protection.
❤❤❤good show...the last is really majin boooooooo 😂😂😂
all these tanks are badass
Geriye ne kaldı peki?
USA: our tank of the future is Abrams X!
UK: Ours is the Challenger 3
Russia: junk 🥱
Russia still tries to make the T-14 Armata work