Its unfortunate the Isuzu MU-X does not have a 4WD system that works on standard sealed roads such as the Ford & Mitsu. The Pajero Sport might be getting old but it's still a great 4WD that can be used 100% of the time on all road surfaces. The Ford is great too but is it really worth the extra $10-15K?
It looked like the PS did a better job with every obstacle. I watched twice. And it did it with less fuss and body movement. It did look a little narrow inside, however.
I'm with you, its a mitsi so it doesn't get the respect it should. Im sick of seeing reviews done by Toyota and Ford fan boys that totally disregard cars like the pajero sport when it's a great package
The two vehicles with AWD on tarmac are at a great advantage. Very useful when it rains after a dry spell as that's whe the roads are the most slippery. Except for snow and ice in the high country areas. Pajero does it all saving 10K
I have never once wished I had 4wd mode for the road in the MUX. Towing a 3 tonne caravan, not towing, raining, none of it ever required an extra 2 driven wheels. I’m sure there are some exceptional circumstances where it might be handy, but I’ll take the fuel economy, less weight, and less complexity from not having the centre diff any day
@@MrCasino3 Ever driven the southern sides on mountains in Tasmania in winter ? I had occasion to in a hired Pajero (proper) and the 4H came in handy because at all the sharp turns there was water and algae on the road which was very slippery. Threw it into 4H and no probs.
Love our Mux lst have just finished 25000kms towing a 2800kg newage manta ray over east and Tasmania no mods didnt miss a beat and proformed great in our SA 4x4 driving course very impressed with how it went in the sand
@@BrettWilliamson I know what you mean but I love my MUX, I'm running a 3inch fox suspension lift, 33s, And it's turned to 180 kW 550 nm, more than enough power for what I need
Bit late on this one Ash bro!!! Short and sweet, epic as always bro 👏🏽 Thanks again for getting amongst the scene here, those Waiuku boys are bloody good eggs alright, no doubt your being looked after 😎
@@paulmcintosh5589 isuzu and toyota share the same transmission but the transfer case and off-road hardware are different. Hilux outperforms the Dmax but narrows the gap once rough terrain mode is engaged.
Isuzu has stayed true to its roots. Not trying to move to the luxury side and sticking with its original workhorse purpose. I think that's what makes it one of the best. I own a 2019 2.5l D-Max and I will say it is the best car I've owned by far. Reliable and honestly a great offroad performer. Suspension is not the most comfortable on the road but offroad is where it excels.
Interesting view that the Everest is hamstrung by its larger physical dimensions, especially when you think about the legendary even bigger and more capable 4WDs like the Toyota Landcruiser or Nissan Patrol.
@@351tgvLol. Even the lexus lx and landcruiser 80 , 100,200,300 all have a wheelbase of 4850mm something that toyota calls golden ratio. Nissan patrol is bigger but has a higher ground clearance so much so that you can literally put a 33.9 inch tyre on a stock patrol without any lift. Silly to compare everest with patrol. The top spec everest with bigger tyres can do extremely good. But not a stock one for sure. Interestingly the stock patrol has a ground clearance of 270 mm.
The slow and low sound of the MU-X will make you buy it. (Ground clereance, price, raliavility and economy are secondary plusses) Then you wife will take it because is great. Then your son will borrow it to go to wilderness, then your neighbour will buy it too. It is infectious. Been there done that.
It would be interesting to find out over time whether the clutch packs in the Ford's transfer case eventually wear out and require replacement. The Pajero Sport and the Isuzu MU-X do not employ clutches in their transfer case, so there is no friction materials that could eventually requirement replacement.
We have a 2015 MUX with close to 180k on it, apart from regular servicing by myself it has not had a thing done to it. It still drives like new even with the original suspension which is very impressive, they really are a well designed and built 4x4.
Isuzu is poor with every other reviewer. As a matter of physics the Ford cannot use double the other two vehicles. He did the same with the Ssangyong. It runs 6 litres/hundred on the highway and he suggested a 650 km range after including low range driving into the fuel economy - who does that? It easily reaches 1000km on the highway, but Isuzu to be rated best in class here shows where his pay comes from. Just rubbish...
How hard were you pushing the Everest to get 20.4L fuel consumption? Seriously there is a massive error going on with your driving style to get that high fuel consumption when everyone else who hs done 4x4 low range testing is showing around 12L per 100km. Did you leave it locked in 1st gear only? you claim to be a driver that wants to take control ... I call BS on that Marcus, clearly you did not take control of the manual mode transmission option.
You said multiple times that the Ford Everest is hamstrung by its size but failed to say or show how exactly. Also its to clinical for you not for the avergar buyer who wants to take their beast straight from the showroom to the track. Your reviews shiuld be what is best for all not best for you
I would like it if the they priced the up grades they talk about. Compare the lift price, suspension, tyres and bash plates. See if it’s really worth it to bulletproof your family 4wd? Plus the weight difference that might affect your towing.
I had a 90's SWB Pajero and loved the thing, sold it to a friend at 300,000 km because the Mrs wanted something more upmarket, so found a Pajero sport with low km's, have had it 6 years and think it's awesome too, very comfortable and nimble, There's also a SWB V6 GDI (2001 yr) in the garage that's fun to drive . My friend loved the old one I sold her too, sadly it caught fire because of a birds nest, I was as gutted as her.
@@silverdale3207 I have never seen a Pajero here in the U.S. however, there are many other models from Mitsubishi, but none near the looking of a Pajero. Such a pity. I would love to have one, but instead I got a land rover and it is amazing. Love it too! Regards! Daniel
@@daniel.4343 Yeah I like the landrovers too, Perhaps the reason the US doesn't have pajero's could be to do with size, The US seems to like big 4x4"s and the Pajero is fairly snug inside . It's perfect for me as I'm tall and lean and feels more like a sportscar than a 4x4, reminds me of the MGBGT I had when I was a young bloke, I won't be trading it for a long time.
@silverdale3207 Yeah man, I think you are right. Pajeros to me is compact car, and it is perfect for me, since I am not a heavy set man. And yes I would say most Americans would rather a bigger 4x4 SUV, because they are quite spacious. I am in Bermuda now, and I saw a couple of pajeros here and they are awesome cars. It is really a pity they don't exist in the U.S. But any way enjoy your car for years to come. I Wil do the same with my Land Rover Discovery sport.
I find it interesting how most of these car review experts, just review the cars and give opinon based on how they drive, look etc. Based on that, they influence or persuade people on what cars they should buy. Never mention or include about the after sale customer support, reliability, and how prolific some car manufactures/dealers are, with throwing customers under the bus with legitimate claims. Not naming names frd, iszy, nssn😂. That should also be included!!!
We believe the previous generation Pajero Sport had a problem with a rough head gasket mating surface, and a running change to the machining process fixed it. No such issue with the current car.
My Isuzu 2021 developed DPF problem and Isuzu Ute Australia did everything to refuse warranty repair. Took them 4 weeks to come up with pathetic excuse of dirt in the fuel tank. I will not buy another Isuzu.
yep lots and lots of info about the DPF issues with the D-Max and M-UX but the automotive media are refusing to report it for fear of losing advertising money. I know of at least 15 D-Max off the road because of th DPF issue and Isuzu refusing to fix under warranty claiming the DPF is a consumable part
Well done! However... Would be great if there is a sound of the engine while you are driving each of them. Having the sound while your driving could help us understand well.. how's the mighty engine RESPONSE in action.
Ordered Pajero Sport this spring and seems new facelifted models arriving, according to dealer photos. I think grille openings way too large and rads easily susceptible to damage in refreshed Pajero Sport. Mainly using paved roads but anyway would you recommend to add some additional protection? (in other words, will cooling be compromised when doing so?). Otherwise, afraid warranty will not cover cases when radiator gets damaged by stones or various road debris.
All of those truck platform SUVs are imported from Thailand. Why did Australia have to be lazy to build those SUVs. I remember Thailand exits the export to AU, and give it to Indonesia to do it. I hope AU do this soon
Look at ford china’s lined up you will know what’s up. They got F150 raptor and Thiland ranger plus explorer and this Everest. It’s also at least 10% cheaper. My family used to own a timber business in ACT… well we moved it to china during Covid.. guess what? The productivity has gone up by 60% in the past 11 months. This is why
It’s a toss between the Everest and Isuzu for me, but I do like the extras on the Everest because I’m not he best 4w driver. And the park assist is also a bonus.
Mitsubishi pajero the best winner smaller engine but you can put the bigger turbo to increasing the power,pajero is the world king offroad rally champion, Ford Everest second, Isuzu mux third
Nice review and good to see some proper offroading done on these as they come from the factory. No doubt most buyers would be quick to fit some ATs and would be great if they had that as an option (the Everest might?). Worth noting the MUX is also about 10k cheaper than the Everest in the real world given the permanent drive-away deal.
most reviews dont choose the mitsubishis as the best but the least off roaders ..but for the records no one gets close on their champioships on paris dakar rallys..now its been forgotten..being new doesnt mean better..
Nothing against the Mitsi, in fact for the price I'm pretty sure I'd pick it over the Isuzu and Ford, well, no chance I'd fork out $80k for a Ford. However I don't recommend mentioning race cars when discussing their road variants. Dakar Mitsi's are simply a road car shaped body on a different platform which can't be purchased = no relevance to what you can buy in a dealership. Cheers
I know those three Asia-Pacific mid-size SUVs are a fit for an Aussie when it comes to outback driving, and I can assume that all of those were made in Thailand.
Everest’s fuel consumption is very poor and not the first time I have seen that in tests. Strange in some ways as have the same engine base in my 2015 D4 with the ZF8 speed and it has been very economical over 7 years at around 11l/100K overall. Maybe its tuned in a way that any off-road use spikes it dramatically.
I just had my isuzu mux last year. Undeniably it is more 100% reliable in terms pf durability, performance and fuel consumption. I must say Isuzu MUX is underrated but can compete to the roads impressively.
I have to agree. I have a 2015 mux lsm and have surprised myself a few times getting through some challenging terrain where other more popular/expensive brands have struggled. I am days away from getting the 2023 model. Hoping it meets/exceeds my expectations.
Very expensive over 70 thousand sounds pretty thirsty to and just wondering what Ford after market support is like. I suppose I better be careful what I say I better not be too negative.
The MU-X, defeated the Mitsubishi when it's pick-up counterpart sucked bigtime with CarExpert's off-road test and the Triton was the drama-free ute that time? 🤔
I am amused that you are the only reporter who has been able to use such a large amount of fuel in the Everest and much the same when you drove the Ranger V6 also you are very happy with the not so impressive in fact poor traction control of the Isuzu.
Are you blind ? In the video the Everest clearly struggling by the steep rocks and climbs , aswell as the mud water corssing . And isuzus traction control works fine if you calibrate it yourself for a few minutes .
@@henredigitalfire07 I bet you still think the Dmax comes out of the same factory as the Isuzu trucks. The traction control turns off when you engage the diff lock, or have they finally fixed that? So facts man do tell.
@@Sabumnim666 the new 2024 mu-x has the same thing it's not a bug it's just not part of the features . Traction control is only there to stabilize the power and that's why the mu-x is just a better offroader than let's say Fortuner ,pajero ECT since it has rough terrain mode which turns off diff locks is engaged . Hill decent control is the only buggy feature , since you have to come to a full stop to engage Hill decent. Since the dmax and mu-z is 5-15k grand cheaper than let's say a Everest .
All 3 are more capable off road then I would need, so which one is more comfortable sitting at 110kph on our rough as guts highways for hours on end, loaded with camping gear, and pulling a
I had the 1st Gen Everest with the good ol 3.2L 5cyl and 6-speed torque converter auto way back some 7 years ago and also had a Pajero Sport 2.4L i4 with 8-speed torque converter at the same time and I can tell you this much from what I recall the Everest was the better of the two at highway cruising loaded up, the Pajero Sport had to be in essentially AWD mode to get anywhere near it, that said for fuel consumption the Pajero Sport was ahead by about 2L per 100km however with a smaller fuel tank (68L v 80L) the Everest had more range so it ws pretty much equal save for the added fuel cost f going to full tank.
As PS user for like 2 gen i would say , from those three PS is the not really nicest .. It's nimble, jiggling, bouncing .. It's all from the shortest wheel base Japanese triple cabs Utes
Buy the Mux - it won't break down😂 And it won't cost you $10000,s if it does Smart electronics are the killer with the Pajero & Everest and when you need help - the sales guys fill you with 👊
Why do all theses comparisons with the utes and suvs when it comes to the ranger and ereverest they have the v6 when they make a 4 cylinder it’s like bringing a gun to a knife fight. Not really a true comparison to me.
Where did the fuel consumption figures come from for the Everest, on test, 20.3l/ 100k, I doubt it would use that much fuel pulling a 3-ton caravan, absolute rubbish.
It is noticeable that the Pajero Sport overcame all obstacles in the easiest way. Amazing!!
Pajero Sport For its Ongoing Fuel ⛽️ Economy all the time.
I am not a hard-core 4x4 traveler.
Pajero luxury is good enough for me.
I've got the Exceed and it's very nice, as luxurious as the rest of them, takes off quickly and the fuel economy is amazing.
Pretty honest review mr crafty.. I knew the Everest this time won't be coming closer to the Mux......the Isuzu engineers did a superb job 👍
I will go for pajero sport,value for money
Everest
Its unfortunate the Isuzu MU-X does not have a 4WD system that works on standard sealed roads such as the Ford & Mitsu. The Pajero Sport might be getting old but it's still a great 4WD that can be used 100% of the time on all road surfaces. The Ford is great too but is it really worth the extra $10-15K?
Ford isn’t worth it
V6 can tow way more than the other two. It's pulls amazingly too
Fuel economy though ..louch
They should compare it with 2.0 bi turbo everest not with the v6 type
@Andika Bambang true I guess... v6 maybe comparable to a Touareg, q7, etc.
It looked like the PS did a better job with every obstacle. I watched twice. And it did it with less fuss and body movement. It did look a little narrow inside, however.
I agree. I see them in my 4WD club and they don't muck around, they are a really good 4WD.
I'm with you, its a mitsi so it doesn't get the respect it should. Im sick of seeing reviews done by Toyota and Ford fan boys that totally disregard cars like the pajero sport when it's a great package
Agreed, also find it hard to believe that the isuzu won considering all the reviewer's feedback prior to the verdict.
prolly due to shorter wheelbase
I've looked at all three lately.. it's a personal thing but the Pajero sport unfortunately is sooo much smaller inside than the other two..
The two vehicles with AWD on tarmac are at a great advantage. Very useful when it rains after a dry spell as that's whe the roads are the most slippery. Except for snow and ice in the high country areas. Pajero does it all saving 10K
I have never once wished I had 4wd mode for the road in the MUX. Towing a 3 tonne caravan, not towing, raining, none of it ever required an extra 2 driven wheels. I’m sure there are some exceptional circumstances where it might be handy, but I’ll take the fuel economy, less weight, and less complexity from not having the centre diff any day
@@MrCasino3 Yeah, it's just a good option when it rains. I have gone sideways in my ute a few times accidentally but luckily held on to it.
@@MrCasino3 Ever driven the southern sides on mountains in Tasmania in winter ?
I had occasion to in a hired Pajero (proper) and the 4H came in handy because at all the sharp turns there was water and algae on the road which was very slippery.
Threw it into 4H and no probs.
I do like how the Everest has the FREE offroad option which includes all terrains and smaller alloys, as well as some underbody protection.
Yep..which the review video conveniently just ignored.
I like the MuX Isuzu. The others two vehicles are also impressive
Love our Mux lst have just finished 25000kms towing a 2800kg newage manta ray over east and Tasmania no mods didnt miss a beat and proformed great in our SA 4x4 driving course very impressed with how it went in the sand
So Isuzu have increased their advertising budget with you guys 😂
They couldn't pull the skin off a day old custard and their TC is garbage, but I see the video used the 'truck like' saying.
@@BrettWilliamson I know what you mean but I love my MUX, I'm running a 3inch fox suspension lift, 33s, And it's turned to 180 kW 550 nm, more than enough power for what I need
For me Isuzu MU-X is the best 😂😂😂
Mitsubishi Pajero sport 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗
Bit late on this one Ash bro!!! Short and sweet, epic as always bro 👏🏽 Thanks again for getting amongst the scene here, those Waiuku boys are bloody good eggs alright, no doubt your being looked after 😎
Umm, 18 inch rims with AT’s are a no cost option for the Everest sport. So is that all ford can give you for the test?
obviously Ford didn't sponsor this round of review
I feel like the new Pajero based off the new triton ute will be the better-priced winner. Update the tech and it's a sick deal.
Isuzu's TC is behind the other Japanese brands - especially the PS in this test.
The traction control calibration comes from the same toyota unit same gearbox as well
@@paulmcintosh5589 isuzu and toyota share the same transmission but the transfer case and off-road hardware are different. Hilux outperforms the Dmax but narrows the gap once rough terrain mode is engaged.
Pajero do smart work in off-road
Isuzu has stayed true to its roots. Not trying to move to the luxury side and sticking with its original workhorse purpose. I think that's what makes it one of the best. I own a 2019 2.5l D-Max and I will say it is the best car I've owned by far. Reliable and honestly a great offroad performer. Suspension is not the most comfortable on the road but offroad is where it excels.
Luckily I have driven both the Ford & the Isuzu or one might believe you. Oh, I like how you turned the harshness of the Mux's engine into a positive!
Interesting view that the Everest is hamstrung by its larger physical dimensions, especially when you think about the legendary even bigger and more capable 4WDs like the Toyota Landcruiser or Nissan Patrol.
shhhh its a conspiracy, this reviewer is a well know anti Ford guy.,
@@351tgvlol
@@351tgvLol. Even the lexus lx and landcruiser 80 , 100,200,300 all have a wheelbase of 4850mm something that toyota calls golden ratio. Nissan patrol is bigger but has a higher ground clearance so much so that you can literally put a 33.9 inch tyre on a stock patrol without any lift. Silly to compare everest with patrol. The top spec everest with bigger tyres can do extremely good. But not a stock one for sure. Interestingly the stock patrol has a ground clearance of 270 mm.
Muy buenos sus videos saludos desde Córdoba, Argentina
Marcus Graft is my favorite off-road car reviewer.I love his reviews
The slow and low sound of the MU-X will make you buy it. (Ground clereance, price, raliavility and economy are secondary plusses) Then you wife will take it because is great. Then your son will borrow it to go to wilderness, then your neighbour will buy it too. It is infectious. Been there done that.
Pajero Sport Exceed is 2k cheaper unless you care about GSR badging and some parts being blacked out.
@10:44, Everest on test 20.3L/100km??? 😮
It would be interesting to find out over time whether the clutch packs in the Ford's transfer case eventually wear out and require replacement. The Pajero Sport and the Isuzu MU-X do not employ clutches in their transfer case, so there is no friction materials that could eventually requirement replacement.
We have a 2015 MUX with close to 180k on it, apart from regular servicing by myself it has not had a thing done to it. It still drives like new even with the original suspension which is very impressive, they really are a well designed and built 4x4.
Great to see a test of Australia's new class of cars. See they often outside school.
Can you not also use the Parejo sport in AWD high traction surfaces also
Yes he mentioned that more than once in the review. And for the Everest as well.
How is that Ford fuel consumption? No thank you.
Isuzu is poor with every other reviewer. As a matter of physics the Ford cannot use double the other two vehicles. He did the same with the Ssangyong. It runs 6 litres/hundred on the highway and he suggested a 650 km range after including low range driving into the fuel economy - who does that? It easily reaches 1000km on the highway, but Isuzu to be rated best in class here shows where his pay comes from. Just rubbish...
Yep. I drove both Everest and MUX and bought the MUX. 😊 12:03
Smart man👍, i’ve had plenty of 4j’s over the years and their bullet-proof
4×4 pajero sport good job
How hard were you pushing the Everest to get 20.4L fuel consumption? Seriously there is a massive error going on with your driving style to get that high fuel consumption when everyone else who hs done 4x4 low range testing is showing around 12L per 100km.
Did you leave it locked in 1st gear only? you claim to be a driver that wants to take control ... I call BS on that Marcus, clearly you did not take control of the manual mode transmission option.
must be a typo error,
@351tgv Calm down ford fan boy
@@sonofamountiefr
You said multiple times that the Ford Everest is hamstrung by its size but failed to say or show how exactly. Also its to clinical for you not for the avergar buyer who wants to take their beast straight from the showroom to the track. Your reviews shiuld be what is best for all not best for you
I would like it if the they priced the up grades they talk about. Compare the lift price, suspension, tyres and bash plates. See if it’s really worth it to bulletproof your family 4wd? Plus the weight difference that might affect your towing.
Surely the Ford can't be using twice as much fuel as the others, it's either a flawed test or failed automaker.
Ford has a V6 and we saw in the video how it was struggling with the steep rocks aswell as the water mud
😮 Great video! To me personally the winner was the Pajero. Although I must say that the old 80's and 90's models were much better looking.
I had a 90's SWB Pajero and loved the thing, sold it to a friend at 300,000 km because the Mrs wanted something more upmarket, so found a Pajero sport with low km's, have had it 6 years and think it's awesome too, very comfortable and nimble, There's also a SWB V6 GDI (2001 yr) in the garage that's fun to drive . My friend loved the old one I sold her too, sadly it caught fire because of a birds nest, I was as gutted as her.
@@silverdale3207 I have never seen a Pajero here in the U.S. however, there are many other models from Mitsubishi, but none near the looking of a Pajero.
Such a pity. I would love to have one, but instead I got a land rover and it is amazing. Love it too!
Regards!
Daniel
@@daniel.4343 Yeah I like the landrovers too, Perhaps the reason the US doesn't have pajero's could be to do with size, The US seems to like big 4x4"s and the Pajero is fairly snug inside . It's perfect for me as I'm tall and lean and feels more like a sportscar than a 4x4, reminds me of the MGBGT I had when I was a young bloke, I won't be trading it for a long time.
@silverdale3207 Yeah man, I think you are right. Pajeros to me is compact car, and it is perfect for me, since I am not a heavy set man. And yes I would say most Americans would rather a bigger 4x4 SUV, because they are quite spacious. I am in Bermuda now, and I saw a couple of pajeros here and they are awesome cars. It is really a pity they don't exist in the U.S.
But any way enjoy your car for years to come. I Wil do the same with my Land Rover Discovery sport.
I own a Isuzu. Very disappointed in the vehicle. Hate all the tech. How could anyone recommend it
I find it interesting how most of these car review experts, just review the cars and give opinon based on how they drive, look etc. Based on that, they influence or persuade people on what cars they should buy. Never mention or include about the after sale customer support, reliability, and how prolific some car manufactures/dealers are, with throwing customers under the bus with legitimate claims. Not naming names frd, iszy, nssn😂. That should also be included!!!
Does this gen Pajero Sport have overheating issues?
We believe the previous generation Pajero Sport had a problem with a rough head gasket mating surface, and a running change to the machining process fixed it. No such issue with the current car.
Pajero sport. Complete package.
Is there any advantage in keeping the 20inch rim and tyres. We are unlikely to go off road
My Isuzu 2021 developed DPF problem and Isuzu Ute Australia did everything to refuse warranty repair. Took them 4 weeks to come up with pathetic excuse of dirt in the fuel tank. I will not buy another Isuzu.
yep lots and lots of info about the DPF issues with the D-Max and M-UX but the automotive media are refusing to report it for fear of losing advertising money.
I know of at least 15 D-Max off the road because of th DPF issue and Isuzu refusing to fix under warranty claiming the DPF is a consumable part
Mux all the way
Well done!
However...
Would be great if there is a sound of the engine while you are driving each of them.
Having the sound while your driving could help us understand well.. how's the mighty engine RESPONSE in action.
anyone know where this is filmed? What 4x4 track is this?
This video was filmed on an off road track in the south coast of NSW. Cheers, CG team
Ground clearance on MUX is 225mm at best with those 265/50R20 tires
Mine is 236 with those tires you listed
They need to make the MuX in V,6
A properly tuned 4jj can compete with tuned v6
Knowing Isuzu, they would make a straight six. As they're specialists with diesel engines.
Ordered Pajero Sport this spring and seems new facelifted models arriving, according to dealer photos.
I think grille openings way too large and rads easily susceptible to damage in refreshed Pajero Sport.
Mainly using paved roads but anyway would you recommend to add some additional protection? (in other words, will cooling be compromised when doing so?). Otherwise, afraid warranty will not cover cases when radiator gets damaged by stones or various road debris.
All of those truck platform SUVs are imported from Thailand. Why did Australia have to be lazy to build those SUVs. I remember Thailand exits the export to AU, and give it to Indonesia to do it. I hope AU do this soon
Look at ford china’s lined up you will know what’s up. They got F150 raptor and Thiland ranger plus explorer and this Everest. It’s also at least 10% cheaper. My family used to own a timber business in ACT… well we moved it to china during Covid.. guess what? The productivity has gone up by 60% in the past 11 months. This is why
Comparison and racing competition winners is pajero sport dakar
It’s a toss between the Everest and Isuzu for me, but I do like the extras on the Everest because I’m not he best 4w driver. And the park assist is also a bonus.
Any mark-up on price nowadays?
Ford Everest!
Mitsubishi pajero the best winner smaller engine but you can put the bigger turbo to increasing the power,pajero is the world king offroad rally champion, Ford Everest second, Isuzu mux third
#CarsGuide In which country is MPS model produced, exactly the one in this video?
Nice review and good to see some proper offroading done on these as they come from the factory. No doubt most buyers would be quick to fit some ATs and would be great if they had that as an option (the Everest might?).
Worth noting the MUX is also about 10k cheaper than the Everest in the real world given the permanent drive-away deal.
The Everest did have the option. No cost for Sport and Platinum. $500 for the lower specs.
Does*
20.3L/100 on the Everest really??
Was the excessive Ford fuel consumption a mistake? Why didn't you focus on this a little more?
No , my friend owns a Ford Everest V6 and it gets about 18 l per 100km
most reviews dont choose the mitsubishis as the best but the least off roaders ..but for the records no one gets close on their champioships on paris dakar rallys..now its been forgotten..being new doesnt mean better..
Nothing against the Mitsi, in fact for the price I'm pretty sure I'd pick it over the Isuzu and Ford, well, no chance I'd fork out $80k for a Ford. However I don't recommend mentioning race cars when discussing their road variants. Dakar Mitsi's are simply a road car shaped body on a different platform which can't be purchased = no relevance to what you can buy in a dealership. Cheers
Two different comparisons. The Dakar vehicle is specifically speced for the race whereas the Pajero is a general off roader....
Pajero Sport 24/7!❤
I know those three Asia-Pacific mid-size SUVs are a fit for an Aussie when it comes to outback driving, and I can assume that all of those were made in Thailand.
Im guessing if you were doing a lot of towing then MUX over ford fuel consumption and over sport smaller engine
Lol MUX… please… the Pajero kills it in off-roading, what they paying you to throw yourself all over an inferior vehicle?
no fortuner?
Everest’s fuel consumption is very poor and not the first time I have seen that in tests. Strange in some ways as have the same engine base in my 2015 D4 with the ZF8 speed and it has been very economical over 7 years at around 11l/100K overall. Maybe its tuned in a way that any off-road use spikes it dramatically.
Where is the Fortuner in this match up??
Why didn’t you test the 2litre Everest. It
Top of the range specs
You should Take lots of pictures about cars Self-portrait
I just had my isuzu mux last year. Undeniably it is more 100% reliable in terms pf durability, performance and fuel consumption. I must say Isuzu MUX is underrated but can compete to the roads impressively.
I have to agree. I have a 2015 mux lsm and have surprised myself a few times getting through some challenging terrain where other more popular/expensive brands have struggled. I am days away from getting the 2023 model. Hoping it meets/exceeds my expectations.
Do not agree. Really how much did Isuzu pay you
how would kia sorento and carnival go with off road
Not enough ground clearance
About as well as a Corolla.
Not very far and likely an expensive recovery.
lol. You're not serious are you?
Mux for me
Very expensive over 70 thousand sounds pretty thirsty to and just wondering what Ford after market support is like. I suppose I better be careful what I say I better not be too negative.
The MU-X, defeated the Mitsubishi when it's pick-up counterpart sucked bigtime with CarExpert's off-road test and the Triton was the drama-free ute that time?
🤔
I am amused that you are the only reporter who has been able to use such a large amount of fuel in the Everest and much the same when you drove the Ranger V6 also you are very happy with the not so impressive in fact poor traction control of the Isuzu.
Are you blind ? In the video the Everest clearly struggling by the steep rocks and climbs , aswell as the mud water corssing . And isuzus traction control works fine if you calibrate it yourself for a few minutes .
@@henredigitalfire07 Pop into Spec Savers yourself
@@Sabumnim666 wow so funny , get your facts straight next time
@@henredigitalfire07 I bet you still think the Dmax comes out of the same factory as the Isuzu trucks. The traction control turns off when you engage the diff lock, or have they finally fixed that?
So facts man do tell.
@@Sabumnim666 the new 2024 mu-x has the same thing it's not a bug it's just not part of the features . Traction control is only there to stabilize the power and that's why the mu-x is just a better offroader than let's say Fortuner ,pajero ECT since it has rough terrain mode which turns off diff locks is engaged . Hill decent control is the only buggy feature , since you have to come to a full stop to engage Hill decent. Since the dmax and mu-z is 5-15k grand cheaper than let's say a Everest .
❤ ilike the suv's but everest
Driven the Everest and the MUX, onroad, there is no comparison….the Everest wins hands down. Apart from size, it wouldn’t be much difference off-road.
China gets explorer and Everest when the down under only gets water down Everest. What is up with this? Ford
Agreed. Very biased review towards the Mux. Not a bad rig but the Everest eats it alive. Take the badges off each car and try again.
Thanks for comparing . How would the Rexton with the Ironman suspension go against these in off road?
The Rexton ain’t even making it on the beach
Isuzu ALLDAY!
Ford everest followed by pajero sport
All 3 are more capable off road then I would need, so which one is more comfortable sitting at 110kph on our rough as guts highways for hours on end, loaded with camping gear, and pulling a
I had the 1st Gen Everest with the good ol 3.2L 5cyl and 6-speed torque converter auto way back some 7 years ago and also had a Pajero Sport 2.4L i4 with 8-speed torque converter at the same time and I can tell you this much from what I recall the Everest was the better of the two at highway cruising loaded up, the Pajero Sport had to be in essentially AWD mode to get anywhere near it, that said for fuel consumption the Pajero Sport was ahead by about 2L per 100km however with a smaller fuel tank (68L v 80L) the Everest had more range so it ws pretty much equal save for the added fuel cost f going to full tank.
As PS user for like 2 gen i would say , from those three PS is the not really nicest .. It's nimble, jiggling, bouncing .. It's all from the shortest wheel base Japanese triple cabs Utes
More pointless reviews of 4WD you can't buy at the moment.
Matindi talaga MUX 4jj3 ❤
Pajero sport is the best
Where is the fortuner??😅😅
Buy the Mux - it won't break down😂
And it won't cost you $10000,s if it does
Smart electronics are the killer with the Pajero & Everest and when you need help - the sales guys fill you with 👊
Why do all theses comparisons with the utes and suvs when it comes to the ranger and ereverest they have the v6 when they make a 4 cylinder it’s like bringing a gun to a knife fight. Not really a true comparison to me.
Isuzu still makes a good engine despite the turbo glitch. They are 500 thou mtrs with timing chain ford hard a wet belt good luck.
What? No Fortuner in the comparison? Good review though.
Everest any day
I would go to mu-x
Where are the Toyotas ?!
Japs invaded Australia let’s not forget it
Poor safety standards, new 5 star rated vehicles here
With the money I saved on the ps I bought a boat.
Isuzu MUX ❤
Why not compare a prado as well?
Did ford fix their lemon gate?
Where did the fuel consumption figures come from for the Everest, on test, 20.3l/ 100k, I doubt it would use that much fuel pulling a 3-ton caravan, absolute rubbish.
At least you didn’t promote the sub safety standard toyota products in order for toyota to make more profit over people’s safety,
I guess the Prado would come way down the list as it's even bigger?
It’s out of date in safety by a long way and should not be compared in the current tested ancap 5 star it’s only 3-4 at best.