When is Eidolon a Liability on a Battlefield? | Deep Dive into a Boros Burn Game vs Mono Black

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3

  • @Lucassis
    @Lucassis 5 місяців тому +3

    Hello again! Nice idea to deep-dive into your matches. I would like to comment some points, trying to contribute:
    - I would replace play with fire and searing blaze for ragavan and lightning helix.
    - On your mulligan to 6, I would have bottomed the mountain, instead of a canyon. The card draw could be relevant.
    - Upon drawing the scalding tarn, I would have cracked canyon first, then playing the land if needed. If not, I would have hold it in my hand, bluffing a potential burn spell. This way, the first draw (from canyon) is unknown, and the second (after scry) is possibly known. The order of the draws (unknown/know) may matter.
    - When the opponent is at 1 life, 1 eidolon is enough. With a second eidolon on the table, I would have attacked with the first.
    Sideboard: on the draw: out 4 eidolon 2 searing blaze // in 4 en-vec 2 wear/tear (although I am not a fan of en-vec because of its cost)
    on the play: out 4 blaze // in 2 wear 2 en-ven. You want the eidolon on the play

  • @michielroskam3877
    @michielroskam3877 5 місяців тому +3

    Eidelon is great, dont question it

  • @michielroskam3877
    @michielroskam3877 5 місяців тому +2

    We are beeing spoiled, with boros burn....ty....these videos are great..... youre playlines are good, aggro is just a deck where youre opponent knows what you got, so y keep em guessing, just fire them bolts