Destiny Reacts to (Here's who REALLY Won in Afghanistan)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 бер 2022
  • Subscribe & like for daily Destiny clips
    ►Skip intro 00:33
    ►Date: 23 Mar, 2022
    ---------------------------------------------------
    This channel is a fan-made channel and not affiliated with Destiny
    #Destiny
    ---------------------------------------------------
    Feeling extra generous?
    buy me hot choco ( ^-^)_旦
    ETH: 0xa6064953533d508E27A995070597348F783a9Ac2
    BTC: bc1qdr6gkkcwzdep4zks6ymadfhqmd0j70dj5vtutk
    XMR: 41oYTwNUqDLAPHFxuHFVp9WhzmHvNJJeWh78FuvMhTV75j4i98uAwHzER3DUonESu2MSNGN2NMsNVfUvu9oo8fmKD5xMXY3
    ---------------------------------------------------
    Feeling extra generous?
    buy me hot choco ( ^-^)_旦
    ETH: 0xa6064953533d508E27A995070597348F783a9Ac2
    BTC: bc1qdr6gkkcwzdep4zks6ymadfhqmd0j70dj5vtutk
    XMR: 41oYTwNUqDLAPHFxuHFVp9WhzmHvNJJeWh78FuvMhTV75j4i98uAwHzER3DUonESu2MSNGN2NMsNVfUvu9oo8fmKD5xMXY3
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 111

  • @Nightknight1992
    @Nightknight1992 2 роки тому +39

    on the lockheed stuff:
    1. who else would buy fucking missiles and fighter jets than a government, so of course 90% of their profit comes from that.
    2. who else would build those weapons for a cheaper price? like if thats the market price then thats the market price...

    • @kennythawsh
      @kennythawsh 2 роки тому

      I’m only 10 mins in but the only mention I heard of 90% was a food company. What do you mean missiles and fighter jets?

    • @Nightknight1992
      @Nightknight1992 2 роки тому +2

      @@kennythawsh 6:27 ''90% of revenue comes from the us government''

    • @Nightknight1992
      @Nightknight1992 2 роки тому +1

      @@nonserviam4813 i timestamped the exact moment

    • @1CE.
      @1CE. 2 роки тому +1

      Also it would make sense for people in congress to be invested in companies related to what they do since that’s what they know best

    • @Imbalanxd
      @Imbalanxd 2 роки тому

      there are other countries

  • @jun3078
    @jun3078 2 роки тому +40

    I think destiny here might be too focused on the numbers game but the blatant clash of interest from politicians in power positions is astonishing and needs questioning even if its 1 dollar.

    • @coimbralaw
      @coimbralaw 6 місяців тому

      “The blatant clash of interest from politicians in power positions.” One of the dumbest, least readable phrases I’ve ever seen.

    • @coimbralaw
      @coimbralaw 6 місяців тому

      Even if it’s one dollar? How did you graduate from grammar school?

  • @eeyun5279
    @eeyun5279 2 роки тому +25

    Honeywell!?! Lol you mean the fortune 100 company that does an insane amount of stuff for both residential and commercial applications? Thermostats, alarm systems, controllers, encoders… would imagine most people with an etf own some Honeywell, you need a little more evidence to say that’s suspicious guy. This guy would call DuPont “a paint company”. Like yea man, but there’s a little more to it

    • @REDDAWNproject
      @REDDAWNproject 2 роки тому

      honeywell is like J & J big.

    • @Yor_gamma_ix_bae
      @Yor_gamma_ix_bae 2 роки тому +1

      Most of the large tech companies do military contracting.

  • @swaggitypigfig8413
    @swaggitypigfig8413 2 роки тому +25

    Good day to all my fellow Dalibanis ❤️

  • @thekavestation
    @thekavestation 2 роки тому +1

    wasn't the betterhelp thing that they say they are signing you up with real therapists but their terms of service basically says they don't vet any therapist and if they aren't a real licensed therapist it's not their fault for connecting you to them

  • @jonesy279
    @jonesy279 7 днів тому

    Hmm, I’m gonna need Drebin to explain *THE WAR ECONOMY* for me again.

  • @TheLumberjack1987
    @TheLumberjack1987 2 роки тому +43

    I'm sorry but Destiny's "it's just 5k/50k etc." take about congress people owning stocks in those companies is just a none argument.
    It's an ethical problem no matter if it's 1 or 1 million dollars.
    Sure the more the worse, but it's not suddenly fine just because it's only 5k.

    • @maxutaibi5986
      @maxutaibi5986 2 роки тому +1

      Inb4 it's not life changing

    • @astrorob6985
      @astrorob6985 2 роки тому +12

      Did he say it wasn’t an ethical problem? Pretty sure he just said it wasn’t that influential to someone who’s already got more money than most people could spend.

    • @connorfinnerty1366
      @connorfinnerty1366 2 роки тому +4

      Destiny basically doesn't believe that conflict of interest is a real thing.

    • @danaolsongaming
      @danaolsongaming 2 роки тому +2

      Is this ownership of direct stock? Or do they hold $500,000 of index funds and those funds hold $15,000 of their money in defense contractor stocks?

    • @TheLumberjack1987
      @TheLumberjack1987 2 роки тому +1

      @@astrorob6985 I'm not sure, when his reaction is "wait a sec, it's only 5k ahahAHAHA and even at 50k this is nothing", then I'm not too sure if he actually thinks it matters, ethically or practically.

  • @OpiatesAndTits
    @OpiatesAndTits 2 роки тому +21

    Conflict of interest isn’t just about the amount it’s about appearances too. We should try to avoid even the appearance of a conflict with this sort of stuff. I also think congress gets swayed with more than just the stocks there’s campaign donations and the PAC system that’s not really accountable at all. Finally there’s jobs waiting for these people in the private sector. Are they being swayed with promises of jobs for family, friends, and themselves? Even if it’s just a promise for when they leave office?
    It’s fine to question whether we are over blowing the case for how “bought out” congress is, but the fact remains even 15 grand in stocks doubling or tripling is a nice pay day for someone with less than 2 mil in net worth (presumably a bunch of that isn’t liquid like homes in DC and in their state) and even if you think it’s not it doesn’t mean the Senator or house member doesn’t feel that way. We simply have no way of knowing if there’s a conflict or not when even the tiniest appearance of one exists. I think beyond reproach is not an unreasonable expectation for the top law makers in the country.
    If you thought your surgeon might profit from harvesting organs would you think “well they make so much money as a surgeon why would they risk it” or would you find a new surgeon just in case? Sometimes we can and should demand more.

    • @kevinjennings8272
      @kevinjennings8272 2 роки тому +1

      Yes sir agreed Congress should not be allowed to hold stocks. If your serving your country you should be self sacrificing and accept your wage as is. None of them should be millionaires etc unless this occurred before office. It’s sickening. Love the comment

    • @coimbralaw
      @coimbralaw 6 місяців тому

      What makes you important or meaningful enough to society in the world that large for you to “demand” anything?

  • @wvance0316
    @wvance0316 2 роки тому +2

    Let me tell you something as someone who works in contracting for the Government. I will need some citations needed and I got zero for cases where Lockheed didn't compete for their contracts. For those of you who don't know jackshit about how these things go, I will tell you that the ones that went to jail or paid fines are the ones that broke the law. The major defense contractors do not do this as they have no need to. When Lockheed wins a bidding for a new weapon system, like say the F-35, the competition occurs during the first bid, because they are the only ones who own the rights to F-35s. After they beat out other contractors for designs, they will be the only ones who can supply new F-35s if say a war breaks out or the Government expands it. So it is fucking dumb to say that they didn't compete it during the war because things they already had competed and had monopolies on producing were suddenly sold more during the war. There is no way Lockheed could get away without doing competition for the initial award because other contractors, like Boeing, would fucking sue the Government for not giving them a fair chance, and they would win. What you are seeing is some internet "expert" trying to connect dots to make a case but really only has like 50% of the material he needed, so he conflated some other shit that looks bad if you don't understand anything about how contracting works and just get attached to the "Government spent big bucks on X, where is the competition." Don't believe me, just look at how he conflated 1k investments to making themselves rich by investing in Government contractors. He is very consistent throughout this video. He finds a few bad apples, then tries to find as many similar apples that aren't as rotten or look to be as rotten, then says look at how big this pile of rotten apples is. He did it with the minor investors in Congress 1k vs 150k and he did it with major defense contractors who have monopolies on items being the same as selling cheap ammo from China and underbidding everyone, which is winning the initial contracts and then being the sole provider getting follow on orders vs. breaking the law to win the lowest bid.

  • @Yor_gamma_ix_bae
    @Yor_gamma_ix_bae 2 роки тому +1

    State department does way more than most people think.

  • @slime8177
    @slime8177 2 роки тому +33

    Steven Bonnell 2

    • @cv4809
      @cv4809 2 роки тому +1

      Esteban

    • @ataridc
      @ataridc 2 роки тому

      His name was Steven Bonnell

    • @Jorgec224
      @Jorgec224 2 роки тому +3

      When is 3 coming out

    • @crayondude8014
      @crayondude8014 2 роки тому +3

      @@Jorgec224 I think they will release it when

    • @kebabfoto
      @kebabfoto 2 роки тому +2

      @@Jorgec224 isn't Nathan technically the 3rd?

  • @Gabe-qc5ji
    @Gabe-qc5ji 2 роки тому

    lmao @1:36 there's some damn good trigger discipline

  • @fatnose0
    @fatnose0 2 роки тому +7

    23:50 I mean regardless, they rly shouldn't be able to invest in those companies in the first place.

  • @TheEccentricPoet
    @TheEccentricPoet 2 роки тому +16

    Of all the "winners" of the war in Afghanistan, I think years from now, China will have been one of the ultimate winners too. They wasted no time in swooping in to "support" Aghanistan after the mess. That was a golden opportunity, and since they'd had their own eye on all the natural resources, just like all the others (not the least of which is lithium), they get to pretend to be their new best friend now - and will get plenty privileges out of that, for sure.

  • @brianlowe904
    @brianlowe904 2 роки тому

    That’s “breakfast” guy. I hate that he’s been recommended to me

  • @sjewitt22
    @sjewitt22 2 роки тому +4

    Destiny can be quite petty and snide with his comments.

  • @ishiali100
    @ishiali100 2 роки тому

    This video is describing the American empire

  • @ziquaftynny9285
    @ziquaftynny9285 2 роки тому

    People in chat dunking on Better Help. My irl therapist worked with them, so that is one.

  • @jimjamjoeyjoejoe
    @jimjamjoeyjoejoe 2 роки тому

    Not sure what Destiny means with his take on NATO in Libya, my understanding is that NATO is a defensive pact, what NATO country was Libya attacking?

  • @ArthurSchoppenweghauer
    @ArthurSchoppenweghauer 2 роки тому +6

    big ol nothing burger, didn't event mention big pharma and poppy fields

  • @zarlei6048
    @zarlei6048 2 роки тому +1

    Iran, China and Russia won the Afghanistan war, there’s your analysis, gz.

  • @jerryjohnson4008
    @jerryjohnson4008 2 роки тому

    Destiny there is also the cost of SCALING weapons. The first weapon will be EXTREMELY COSTLY. So will outfitting a nation not in war. 💀 So thus a jet cost 30 million...but if you go to war, you have the blueprints and design to take that to scale...those million dollar jets become the cost of a car. When you do millions of them. 💀 Same with all weapons. A peacetime force is ALWAYS more costly. But being prepared is worth more than all the money in the world. As the old wise saying .."it is better to have and not need, then need...and not have."

  • @barnsnoble3105
    @barnsnoble3105 2 роки тому

    And war dogs was the government opening up bidding to “small business” since everyone raged about no-bid or contracts going to big corporations.
    These stories are far more complex and more fucked up.

  • @GokayCEKLI
    @GokayCEKLI 2 роки тому +2

    King of minimizing

  • @1CE.
    @1CE. 2 роки тому +5

    I’m absolutely convinced Johnny here is a state department hack
    That doesn’t necessarily mean he’s wrong on everything but his Russia video came out pretty quick, pretty bold assumptions too

    • @loganvanderwier8866
      @loganvanderwier8866 2 роки тому

      Which state department?
      His original video on Ukriane sounded to me, like he was just reciting Russian propaganda.

    • @1CE.
      @1CE. 2 роки тому

      @@loganvanderwier8866 “Russian propaganda”
      At this point everything is Russian propaganda. The sky is blue? Russian propaganda bro
      What I’m primarily hinting at is the fact that this his channel is obviously high production and that video came out quick
      He’s also obviously very much pushing a certain agenda on his channel. A glance at his videos would have you asking my same question too

    • @loganvanderwier8866
      @loganvanderwier8866 2 роки тому +1

      @@1CE. Like I mean he legitimatizes Putin's arguments about Ukraine not being a real independent nation

  • @ant7891
    @ant7891 2 роки тому +9

    "Government contractors get paid money by the government to sell the government things it needs."
    Soy! Soy! How could they do something like this!?!?

  • @perpetual_suffering1458
    @perpetual_suffering1458 2 роки тому +2

    You guys think destiny will retire with his twitch account getting nuked?

    • @idontlikeyouyo
      @idontlikeyouyo 2 роки тому

      He might, he says he'll still stream for the next year for 4 hours then he'll reach his goal amount to retire.

    • @GuyMcDudeman
      @GuyMcDudeman 2 роки тому

      His Twitch was banned? When was this? Why?

    • @AnorexicPandas
      @AnorexicPandas 2 роки тому +6

      Nah, he’d just be at home ranting about the same shit and playing games by himself, why wouldn’t he monetize it

    • @PlasticSiding
      @PlasticSiding 2 роки тому +1

      I think he should. The dude has put his time in I don’t know what else he needs to say. I’m sure after a year of his own pursuits he will come crawling back.

    • @christianyepez1016
      @christianyepez1016 2 роки тому +3

      Nah he'll just switch to streaming on UA-cam full time

  • @bkmessiah1068
    @bkmessiah1068 2 роки тому +1

    Destiny can go full racist now that he's banned from Twitch

  • @ishiali100
    @ishiali100 2 роки тому

    Small government global empire

  • @MegaHarko
    @MegaHarko 2 роки тому +2

    5 mil increase: live changing
    389 mi decrease: slap on the wrist
    sounds about right...

    • @jawbreakerHxC
      @jawbreakerHxC 2 роки тому +4

      5 mil increase to someone making 2 mil.
      380 mil increase to someone worth multiple billions

    • @rahulgordon2508
      @rahulgordon2508 2 роки тому

      What a fucking disingenuous comment. The guy illegally made billions and only lost 400 million. It was absolutely a slap on the wrist. And it was a 27 mill increase from 3 mil which is 10x. I wouldn't call that life changing but it's a far cry from a 5 mill increase

  • @frostydelusions3066
    @frostydelusions3066 2 роки тому +1

    "what did we get?" The most advanced weapons and logistics systems in the world, it really is insane comparing US military tech at the start of the war to the end of it, everything from self healing gas tanks to drones that can stay in the air for days while monitoring areas with AI to scan for enemy movement and buried IEDs.

  • @johnnycash5684
    @johnnycash5684 2 роки тому +3

    Lulz 5x your income per year isn't life changing. What's up with this dude?

    • @mastegoh7139
      @mastegoh7139 2 роки тому +4

      *it's life-changing for a pleb not an already rich person

  • @ishiali100
    @ishiali100 2 роки тому

    The wars floated the US economy for 20 years that why the stock market go up every thing else go down why do people listen to destiny

  • @lafondawilliams
    @lafondawilliams 2 роки тому +2

    thinking we spent alot of money back on that war, knowing 50% of all current cash has been printed after that war LOL.

    • @youtubefiend1183
      @youtubefiend1183 10 місяців тому +1

      this sentance doesnt really mean anyhing lol

    • @lafondawilliams
      @lafondawilliams 10 місяців тому +1

      @@youtubefiend1183 it does if you have intellect, calling out proportionality, guess you missed that

    • @youtubefiend1183
      @youtubefiend1183 10 місяців тому +1

      @@lafondawilliams lol it does not. It literally means nothing. Your statment says nothing of value. But jerk your self off about how smart you are :)

    • @youtubefiend1183
      @youtubefiend1183 10 місяців тому +1

      just to clarify for you. For any amnout of money, you need context and time si very important context. And relation of the nominal value of money to price of goods is another really important context. Without those 2 things it means nothing. So no mather how much money was printed you can deflate the the todays $ value for the value in the Afghan war and you can see what the actual price was. It is not 100% precise. But it gives you an idea. So i dont know what you trying to prove here. but you have 12 year old's understanding of money and inflation.

  • @seavpal
    @seavpal 2 роки тому

    Dallahu snackbar!

  • @draszi
    @draszi 2 роки тому +4

    21:03 what kind of toxic, bullshit take is this? "is it really worth talking about corruption/ insider trading if its only a few thousand dollars?"
    What the fuck?

    • @disser3849
      @disser3849 2 роки тому +1

      In the example its literally a rounding error hence its a waste of time. There will always be bad thing x, if the bad thing x is so marginal you cannot see it with a jeweler's eye and the damage is so miniscule that its essentially non existant, who cares?

    • @disser3849
      @disser3849 2 роки тому

      @Mekehl What do you mean by corrupt? How has it "devoured" our government (considering "capitalist" western nations are way less corrupt than dictators of the east)? When was the US not "devoured" by capitalism?

  • @ztjaenisch
    @ztjaenisch 2 роки тому +1

    "If I had to guess" "I could be wrong" so beta.

  • @FatBeeStudios
    @FatBeeStudios 2 роки тому

    Very underwhelming tbh.

  • @1234567Aesop
    @1234567Aesop 2 роки тому

    This "glorified security guard" schtick is so tired. They don't hire joe schmoe off the street for military operations, these guys always ex military, and more often than not, ex special forces.