Crysis 3 Remastered: PS5, Xbox Series X/S + PS4/Pro, Xbox One/One X - Total Coverage!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 жов 2024
- It's the PC game we've benchmarked more than any other! A game that built for the 2013 cross-generation era that somehow never made its way to Xbox One and PlayStation 4. All that changes now with the arrival of Crysis 3 Remastered. Join Rich and John for a detailed breakdown of an overlooked FPS shooter that looks phenomenal on consoles - all seven Remastered versions on PlayStation and Xbox analysed, plus legacy look-backs at the PC, Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 renditions from 2013. Maximum Game!
Join the DF Patreon for pristine video downloads, behind the scenes content, early access to DF Retro, early access to DF Direct Weekly and much, much more: bit.ly/3jEGjvx
Subscribe for more Digital Foundry: bit.ly/DFSubscribe
Want some DF-branded tee-shirts, mugs, hoodies or pullovers? Check out our store: bit.ly/2BqRTt0
Crysis 3 really was a next gen game before the generation even started, was crazy impressive.
It was multiple gens ahead of it's time. It STILL looks better on PC.
@@SpurnOfHumanity we get it it looks better on PC
@@SpurnOfHumanity it should look better on PC considering there are no true ps5/Xbox series versions. It's just the last gen versions with a 60fps patch
I'm playing the xbox one version and it still looks pretty good. A few framerate issues but the game is still functional which is crazy.
@@SpurnOfHumanity ?
Like legit I've never played any crisis games ever until two days ago and it's all because of digital Foundry an their coverage on the game. I bought the switch version of the trilogy and I've been loving every minute of it it leaves me speechless because I can't really believe that a game of this quality even runs remotely well on the switch it blows my mind. Especially because it runs it very good and I definitely wouldn't have bought them if it wasn't for digital Foundry going through and explaining why crisis has such a technical Marvel
Crysis is a real gem and it sucks that more people haven't had the opportunity to enjoy it. It's a joy to see reports from players like yourself, demonstrating that this more accessible release was worth it!
It sometimes makes me think that the games we consoder visually ‘stunning’ on Switch don’t even hold a candle to what this trilogy did a decade ago.
Holy heck lol 32 likes I've never had a comment get this many likes lol
This comment makes me feel old.
@@ralphwarom2514 LOL I'm 26
I am so grateful for the amount of love DF shows Crysis. Seriously. No one else covers these games like you do. I love these games ALOT. And love that this channel promotes them.
I love seeing Digital Foundry covering Crysis 3 again. I'm nostalgic of when Richard used to test the original Crysis 3 all the time.
Can you imagine the Wolf-of-Wall-Street-levels of insanity at the DF headquarters if a new Crysys gets announced? Champagne bottles popping, people running in underwear, cats and dogs living together, MASS HYSTERIA!
I would literally shit my pants from excitement
... Cwoke and Hwookers
I can't wait for the DF Tech Review when Crysis 4 is out!
Real talk, Ryse with a properly configured Reshade preset with some good DoF still looks absolutely PHENOMENAL on PC. Like to the point of still putting many other modern games to shame. Really wish there were an open world game with the brutality and variety of finishers as Ryse.
That was a cool tech demo! I beat the game!
Yeah I did try out Crysis 3 this year on PC after hearing DF talk about it for 8 years. Pretty fun! Looks great, as mentioned.
I agree with John, even a somewhat poor port of Crysis 3 to the PS4/XBO in 2013 would have been jaw dropping.
I do agree with Rich, however. We might (who knows) have had that uneven frame pacing achieved with cryengine and, perhaps, even lower res. But hey, MAXIMUM COVERAGE by DF as always!
A patch for Ryse would be the reason to buy it, although I've played it via game pass. It's not masterpiece by any means but it's so beautiful and fun.
I've always been interested in it
@@greengamerguy623 it's a decent game. Gets a little repetitive at the end but worth a playthrough for decent gameplay and amazing graphics.
I loved crysis 3 when it launched and thought it got a bad rap. It was a look at next-gen visuals on PC with a really fun campy 80s action movie story and vibe to it. BRB gonna go play it again...
it just had bad rep. because ppl dont want good gameplay, they want shit boring gameplay and a "good" story.
I finished crysis 3 back in 2013 and thought it was an excellent game. I couldn't understand why people didn't like it that much. Now I am not surprised at all. Because in general people don't have a good taste in gaming. The fact that Fortnite, COD and sports games like fifa, madden are some of the top selling games every year with a huge player base is proof of my theory.
@@naqibfarhan4356 or the fact that most people playibg on console and the console version was horrible bad
@@naqibfarhan4356 mostly console users were angry, but pc users didn't complain much it still holds up in terms to lighting and gameplay..
@@naqibfarhan4356Most people are stoopud brainwashed 🐑 i agree
I got Crysis 3 on Switch as well and I'm blown away by how good it looks in portable mode. I do have an OLED but this game would look good on any switch. Crazy how such a demanding game is running so smoothly on Switch while also looking amazing. It pretty much looks like the PS5 version with much lower res and 30 fps, which are big differences but when the core game already looks andp lays so good, it's a marvel on the handheld.
Back almost 10 years ago, DF made a video using PC with specs that would be similar to PS4 and Xbox One and made It run Crysis. If I remember well, It was a good guess jugding by the Port we have today.
Yeah, they were getting solid mid 40s in both console's frame rates back then in the test. I think Crytek lost an opportunity with this game. One they couldn't miss.
Does this mean DF will be switching to Crysis 3: Remastered for their benchmarks? 🤔
Literally my first thought when it was revealed
@@bim8498 haha why not c3 remaster is faster now in cpu bound scenario compare to og c3 but it is more heavy when you are gpu bound which you will be even low medium setting something like RTX 2060 even at 720p lmao
Bring back the train sequence!
I played this in stereoscopic 3D on PS3. It was a bloodbath.
Same here….. from Today’s View it was terrible😵💫
Bloodbath? What does that mean?
@@mindrover777 Probably his eyes due to the fact that 3D glasses are evil.
Same but on the xbox 360, it looked absolutely awful! I've still got my Panasonic 50" Plasma 3d TV.
@@WH250398 😂, the cinematic 3d experience on PS3. Can't imagine.
RotR and SoTR just got DLSS 2.0 support. Maybe one more "final" look into Rise of the Tomb Raider performance and AA quality? Pretty please? :D
+1
As well as Denuvo getting removed
Rise of the Tomb Raider had terrible antialiasing. It would be interesting to see how much it can improve with DLSS.
Well once the patch comes back, for Rise, since they reverted back to the previous due to bugs appearing.
@@Blood-PawWerewolf Now u hav Always Online DRM in its place. derp
It feels good to see a proper remaster that doesn’t take too many liberties with character designs and runs this well. It’s a shame about the checkpoint stutter on PS, but that nitpick pales in comparison to all the great work done here!
This is a port, not a remaster. It's all the same as the original game except for very small changes.
Thank god a game with a good drs implementation.
Crysis 3 is a masterpiece, the graphics were stunning, loved how immersive New York felt, with overgrown vegetation, the soundtrack was amazing , super fun gameplay, so many memories with the game
Sometimes I struggle to see the point of remasters like this as a PC player - but then I look at that side by side X vs 360 footage and just wish I could be a console player finally getting to play a game they remember from their younger years with that improvement.
On the console side I find this to be a scam to be frank. PC players get one copy from Day One which they can scale according to their hardware for no additional cost, but console players are expected to pay twice for the same game.
PC player only paid once. Console player will pay separately for PS3 and PS4 version.
Same with GTA V. PC players paid once and can run the game at 4k, but console players are being sold another "remaster" to unlock 4k else they are stuck with PS4 version which caps out at 1080p 30fps. So, PC player can use the same copy at any settings while console users are expected to buy the same game thrice on PS3 (720p), PS4 (1080p 30fps) and PS5 (4k 60fps?).
It's a scam, these updates should be free or at minimal costs, especially moving from PS4 to PS5 generation since they're basically PC. Rockstar will just change resolution to 4k, move frame rate cap to 60fps and charge another $40 for it.
@@youtindia when you put it like that every remaster can feel like a total scam. I mean imagine if you bought a game on your Samsung Galaxy S9 and then bought a Samsung Galaxy S10 and had to pay for that same game again even though you already have it on your Play store account. That being said as a console player I'm very much used to having to buy a game a second time for another platform and I find being able to get a new version of a game for free through smart delivery or backwards compatibility on PS5 and Xbox series s and x a bit underwhelming since historically next generation versions of some games were often completely different games entirely or they featured all the DLC and some other changes that weren't just related to frame rate or resolution.
@@GenerationZ313 Paid updates made sense when going from PS3 to PS4 because they were different architectures. But charging from PS4 to PS5 when the only real change is resolution and framerate cap and maybe a few change settings, it just feels wrong and a simple cash grab.
@@youtindia oh yeah I completely understand that when you consider just how difficult it is to port a PlayStation 3 game. In fact I always found it amazing whatever you could get a PlayStation 3 game or its contents for free on next-gen consoles but that was smart delivery and backwards compatibility it just makes the transition feel so underwhelming
@@youtindia yeah some 3rd party console publishers like EA(owner of crytek at that time), 2k etc really use console users trust on their eco-system to scam kids and casual users, problem is sony and microsoft are not doing good a job to regulate their marketplaces, apple is much better in this regard..
Looking back it's hard to believe I played through Crysis 2 and 3 at those low framerates on 360.
Watching this makes me wonder how CD Project Red ever thought they could get Cyberpunk to run well on last gen consoles
It's a crime that *Warhead* got lost in the remaster mix! Those who know it, know how much its absence is missed.
It's basically a better optimized, arguably tighter level design and pacing, progression of the original Crysis M.O., supported by excellent encounter set-ups that fully exploit all the suit powers in meaningful ways - and great physics set ups too.
Plus, *Warhead* explores the action taking place across the other side of the island and nearby locations, kinda' "completing" the Crysis 1 premise and narrative, and taking it a little further in the process.
This makes it pretty damn essential to experience right after Crysis 1.
Or any time for that matter.
It's a very entertaining campaign, and Psycho is an amusing off-kilter protagonist with a completely new take on reactions for similar 'big reveal' moments - compared to Nomad.
"Crytek lost the original code for Warhead so they can't remaster it" seems like an unbelievably irresponsible gaffe if it's true.
I agree. It was my favourite Crysis game after 3. But I do think they lost the source code. That, or they simply thought that remastering Warhead would take as much time and resources as Crysis 1, yet won't lead to any prophet (see what I did there?) since it's not as famous as the other games in the franchise.
@@rtxmeatlug3149 At least it's still playable on PC... with a little effort.
@@griffgames9538 True.
I would recommend this game to anyone, the entire trilogy. It’s an amazing FPS and great story.
I really love the Crysis trilogy. I wish they still made creative linear FPS campaigns like this.
That's why I love the Metro series and DOOM Eternal so much. And Titanfall 2. They're some of the only truly unique and amazing FPS campaigns we've had since Crysis 3, and Half Life 2
I like how the CRYSIS games are very much linear but there are multiple ways you can go through a situation, kind of like Dishonored
@@HugoStiglitz88
Titanfall 2 was so sic man
Only problem with it was it was way too short
What’s preventing them from implementing this DRS solution into crysis 1 remastered to help improve performance across the board there?
They have said more updates will be coming to Crysis 1 after this trilogy launch
@@nobody4821 Source?
@@through_the_never5425 live stream they did
It will take a while to see those because, because console update verifications are long.
@@nobody4821 native next Gen versions?
Sub-optimal was almost all games from the end of that console gen and we didn’t have Pro versions. I remember slumming it through this on 360. This looks so much more satisfying. All three of them.
I remember the game running so poorly on 360 that, playing multiplayer, you had to fight the framerate as much as the other players.
Far cry 3 ( 22- 30 fps)
Borderlands 2 (25 to 30 fps)
Bioshock infinite ( 25 to 30 fps)
Metro last light (22-30)
Few examples of how that generation was struggling by the end.
@@ajsingh4545 not to mention horrible screen tearing, minutes of loading at a time and pretty much non-existent textures in some stuff.
@@DrGamelove not to mention the graphics settings were equivalent to the low to medium settings of PC
@@rockapartie that sounds like playing a nightmare.
Played Crysis 3 on a 7970 back in the day. One play through at 60fps 1080p second I did 1080p 30fps with a controller to enjoy the scenery. I played Crysis 1 on an 8800gt at 30fps at 1680x1050 so it was a nostalgic moment.
Absolutely loving the Console focused content, more pls.
aren't you an AMDrone?
@@sanmattew7221 was that supposed to be clever lmao
Classic Prince Dizzy. How many years have you been posting this?
@@VaydaladaVodalada that was supposed to be clever as much as you were supposed to be successful in life.
Its good
Just a random comment, sry!
It’s just crazy how this game beats so many ‘next gen’ titles visually in several aspects. Nearly 10 years later and this game still stands up and even excels through its art and technology combined.
Seeing this game run on Switch and looking so good is just mind blowing.
Looking forward to playing this on my Xbox Series X once I finish Crysis 2 Remastered.
Cool. I bought it for my Atari 2600, and can't wait to play it after I get home. Only takes 15 minutes to load the first level via tape.
@@rocketassistedgoat1079 i got crysis 3 on my commodore 64 only 5 minutes with floppy drive and you are in the game
You can tell John is truly excited about a game when his voice cracks.
a DF crysis analysis without Alex??? Not bespoke :(
He will do ray tracing or any deep analysis for PC version, as usual.
This game on pc still looks better to me than most new games. Heck the grass and textures and weapon details are still ahead of Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition which is one of the most visually ambitious games now.
Just wanted to say I love the work you guys do! Thanks DF
I played all 3 of them on ps3 and loved it. Can't imagine playing them at such higher quality on PC in 2013
"you've played it many times before, but you always feel like you can optimize it"
*like actually hitting the barrel?* 😂
Add a game journalist mode!!!!!!
The multiplayer on this game back on 360 was insanely fun. I hope the remaster has multiplayer.
Another game that runs better on XSX. Nice work DF!
Now you can sleep at night 🤣
Bruh almost 99.9 percent of the games runs better on Xbox series x , it's literally da beast 💪
A old game.
@@shyamkumarsasi3577 pc wants a word with you lol
@Lov Mir
Exactly which PC?
I’ll be honest, I don’t think these games quite hold up in terms of gameplay in the way I was hoping. It actually reminds of the heavy feeling of the Killzone series that just sort of bogs it down. Visually great, but I’d still easily prefer going back to something like Resistance or even Far Cry 3 which I think nailed exactly what the original Crysis was trying to do but was better in pretty much every way except graphical fidelity.
The weighty feeling of Killzone was what actually appealed to me the most.
@@flyingplantwhale545 gotta love that heavy killzone feeling. was a nice contrast to the light and twitchy COD controls of the time.
I’m a bit disappointed we didn’t get multiplayer I’m Crysis 2 remastered. I’m probably in the minority but I loved 2’s MP
Both 2 and 3 had good multiplayer IMO.
@@TreesOnTheMoon yeah i remember but hackers always ruined the game because there was no anti cheat but never the less it was so much fun
My gosh... I lived for Crysis 2 multiplayer. 3 never reached the same heights for me. Bummed that I won't get to relive the Crysis 2 glory days.
Skyline was goated.
I wholeheartedly agree. multiplayer was the best part of the game. Why do they have a need to exclude it from remaster is beyond me. No buy for me then. Same goes for Modern Warfare 2 Remastered.
Man, what Crysis DID have over it's contemporaries, like Halo, was that you really could be methodical and tactical with your approach. Instead of just brute forcing your way through a horde of enemies. With the new confirmation of 4, may have to get back into these...
The multiplayer for this game was really fun too. It's kind of a shame they didn't implement it again but I understand why.
4 player splitscreen at xbox 360 graphics wouldve been just fine to keep some multiplayer
In this generation DF is getting more
and more vague, Xbox Series X has the advantage on resolution but they don t show the figures and only say they are both great. Xbox has better performance and they keep saying that is good on both. Series S is the only of the new console that they disclose resolution its dynanic 1440p but DF prefer to say that is 900p to 1440p....
They had the exact numbers on the DRS range on series s. The other two are much harder to pixel count
May be they recieve the bribe mohney from sony
idk why but i feel like they are being biased as time goes, in 360 era they used to pinpoint even the slightest differences.
@@hunterbowser667 in the past they could do it, other channels do it....
Rotten channel
Crisis 3nis one the most enjoyable shooters I’ve ever played. Love it on PC. One of only 4 shooters I play through again and again.
Eariler this year I played the original 360 version on series x looks like another playthrough!
What’s the other 3?
@@shmekelfreckles8157 Halo: CE, Half Life 2 (it you can call it a shooter), Gears 1 and Metro Exodus. I could also include Goldeneye N64, MW 2019 and Halo 3.
@@funkam0nkey oh, I see. Is Metro Exodus that good? And why Gears 1 but not the sequels?
@@shmekelfreckles8157 Gears 1 for nostalgia and, yes, Metro Exodus is that good. On PC or the enhanced edition on console.
Crysis 3 in its ultra setting might as well be a PS5 game, and I think people would still praise its graphics.
It's crazy no one mentions how good or bad the HDR is in the game. I thought it looked better with it off.
It's tone mapped. Which always is hit or miss.
I play with HDR off. It looks way better to me...
Thanks for covering the old generation DF
Picked up the Crysis 2 and 3 Friday. Didn't even know it was releasing till I saw your first video on the matter. The games are great. Ran poorly on 360 and ps3. Glad it runs good. Replaying through Crysis 2 now. Game looks and plays great on ps5.
Crysis 2 on PS5 plays so well. I can't believe it's over ten years old.
Bro its unplayable are u blind?
Good to see the consoles finally have a version of this game that runs well. Probably would've done much better as a PS4/Xbox One launch title back then.
Curious how a PC version will be handled, if this version is graphically identical to the original PC release. I hope it's not a minor re-release over a patch because for years now the original either runs well or or is basically unplayable on modern PCs with the low GPU utilisation and stuck framerate issues.
Y’all continue doing gods work making sure we get solid ports. As a PC gamer I can’t thank you enough for the work you do with these devs pushing them to do their best.
When Rich dine in a restaurant he always make sure to analyze the food if it has better texture and higher framerate when he chew the food.
Summary: 60fps grass. Wichard is happy.
Glad to see consoles finally get a 'real' version of this game. I loved it back on 360, and like with Crysis 2, it's now a dream come true to see them both on current/old gen again.
Phil Spencer is a genius
Seriously DF, you've milked this game more than the game Devs and that's saying something
It held up as a benchmark for years and years.
Future proofing was high.
You mean that in a good way right?
In a sea of FPS shooters in the western gaming market, Crysis was quickly forgotten about.
Crysis wasn't forgetten but there were much better shooters like Bioshock even back in the day
I remember getting a brand new PlayStation 3 copy of Crysis 3for $1.99 CAD during the holiday season back in 2016. I never did play it though and since then I bought an Xbox 360 copy which I intended to use on my Xbox One but with this remaster out I'm not sure which versions of the game to just play since I've never played any of the three games before.
@@oror3751 BioShock was very much inferior as a shooter, but it was good in other ways.
I am playing 2 and 3 remastered on my OG Xbox one and I’m really impressed with how well it looks and runs. Much better than what I remember from my 360 versions. Well done.
Really wish they bring MP back in a future update or something. I loved playing the MP so much in this game, Hunter was amazing
I doubt it will happen given that a lot of other remasters that have been released over the years often cut out the multiplayer. Assassin's Creed ezio collection, uncharted Nathan Drake collection, Kingdom hearts birth by sleep final mix are just a handful of examples of games that got remastered and had their multiplayer components removed.
Digital Foundry should build a killer build from 2013 and see how the remastered version runs on it.
Crysis 2 and 3 aren't just 60 fps titles on next gen consoles. They support graphical enhancements not available on the previous generation. The livestream playthrough with crytech already confirmed this.
I love Crysis, been there for every game day one and was waiting for the complete trilogy to be remastered to re visit ❤️
9:37 PlayStation 5 vs Xbox Series X via Backwards Compatibility modes
Series x wins again
I bet Dolby Vision/Auto HDR on the xbox series version would look great since the game is so detailed.
@@andrenascimento9112 they're the same.
@@adrianhosein7698 nop seriesx superior ,the stutteringStation 5 is weak.
@@raios-rogueboss-slayer4179 another L for your PS5, is the ONLY thing that matters , illusions i leave that to you .
That train sequence is so funny - the fact you guys can use it as a comparison just by not interacting and survive anyway.
Not buying 2 or 3 unless they fix all the many remaining issues with the Crysis 1 remaster on consoles. Soooo much left to fix!
Awww how sad
Same here, after more than one year still unplayable mainly because of that massive input lag. Not buying anything more from them, specially without knowing if it also happens with 2 and 3 (but I can imagine the answer, almost 0 hope with Crytek nowadays).
It will be adressed soon
Eh Crisis Remastered had it's fare share of problems on PC too. I'd honestly rather just play the original maxed on PC instead.
@@XxViciousxX Have they at least fixed the damn suit mode wheel? Last I saw it you couldn't even aim down sights and change a suit mode at the same time. Bringing up the suit wheel would cancel aiming down sights!! Like they literally spent ZERO MINUTES play-testing before releasing that trash.
Crysis 3 really was a next gen game. It's basically even with killzone shadow fall that was exclusively a PS4 game. The crysis 3 remaster on base PS4 and killzone sf iirc are both 1080p at 30fps
Absolutely not. Killzine was full pbr.
I loved the multiplayer in this game so much
Series S is doing damn good here.
Yes it is I have Ps5 version and the series s looks just as good 👍🏻
The visual and (slight) performance update really made me want to experience it again and properly on my new hardware.
Wasn't disappointed at all ! Thanks DF.
This remaster looks fantastic. Much better than Crysis 2 which still looks good. On Series X btw.
"It's amazing how demanding this game can still be"
No, MSAA is demanding, not the game.
Let's get this out of the way too: next to several other games around 2013, Cry3 wasn't exactly an all rounded masterpiece. It's absolute fun for sure but it was a short shooting gallery with once again uninteresting villains even on the highest difficulty. The cloak worked on almost all enemies, human enemies were especially dull and unthreatening and the bow was overpowered. Not challenging nor smart enough to be memorable. I'm not sure why people are looking forward to a potential Crysis 4 when Hunt: Showdown's overall premise deserves more investment.
Let me be clear: it's good that they made these remasters. 60fps on current consoles for everybody is a good day for any game (ignoring the hot mess of Cry1:Re).
Bahahaha, you’re not wrong XD
even without MSAA the maxed settings were extremely demanding
Thanks
That's what I remember. Great to look at but the play through 🤷🏾♂️
@@ammanus356 Extremely demanding on what? You needed an RX 480 to max everything out with FXAA and stay above 60FPS at 1080p.
@@Patrik1st yeah, it was meh.
10:59 ALEX! I heard you!
And it's still not the final Crysis video? That the next one be the last.
Any chance of a native next-gen version for the trilogy? And would that include the PC features like Ray Tracing on PS5 and Series X?
I doubt this, if pcs are already struggling with the remaster version then it is possible that they wont be able to hang with RT features... Theyll probably have the game running on medium with low RT. by sacrificing resolution even further.
What is Rich talking about? Crysis 3 on a 3080ti maxed out gets around 80fps average at 4k and never drops below 60. I played it through twice
- this remaster w/ enhanced presets.
John quickly with the damage control as soon as its mentioned that DRS is simply better on Series X compared to PS5 lmao
Was clear how he avoid that conversation.
If anything, it kind of shows that games havent really been pushed graphically since Crysis. DONT get me wrong, there are some amazing looking games but i never felt the kind of graphically leap that Crysis had, where it felt generations ahead of everyone.
if next gen consoles run in back compatibility mode, can the devs use the full power of the consoles?
No
@Lov Mir 2070 Super or 2080 class hardware cannot play this game at native 4K 60fps ultra
@Lov Mir such a ignorant comment.
@Lov Mir The 670 and 680 had no real DX 12 support and had insufficient VRAM. Older 900 and 10 series cards hold up much better because they don’t have those problems (outside of the 1050/960).
So I agree in the sense that 8 gigabytes of VRAM will eventually be inadequate, but that’s not relevant in this case.
@Lov Mir mucho texto
Better graphics than most of the last generation games. Thats show how you can improve a game based on PC.
Many last generation games looking better than Crysis 3. Many....
Very high praise for crysis and crytek. Apparently MS are trying to acquire them. Another world class studio in the stable.
Source or bullshit
@@haloepic3092 It seems mostly desire instead of any hard facts at the moment. MS already have several 1st person shooter studios and don't really need more, but the tech Crytek has still keeps them in contention for an acquisition. Could be worth acquiring just to keep the studio out of the clutches of Tencent or Embracer though (the latter hoovering up almost everything thats not nailed down right now).
Gonna end up ruined like the rest of them.
@@haloepic3092 source is jez cordon and jeff grubb who said MS are looking into the possibility of acquiring IO interactive (hitman), avalanche (just cause) and crytek (ryse, crysis). all 3 of these companies are currently working on xbox exclusive games. and just today phil spencer said they're looking to make more studio acquisitions check tom warrens twitter (guy from the verge)
@@zybch spencer said today he's looking to buy more studios.
Variable Rate Shading, is the reason why Xbox consoles do not suffer from checkpoint frame dips like on PS. Because they both use Dynamic res scaling, the extra meta data provided by VRS is helping get rid of checkpoint lag. Where as you guys said each frame can be dynamically altered and dynamically scaled to meet 60fps as a target. The second something is loaded extra, (check point) the Dynamic scaling loses a bit of data due to increased latency.
That makes no sense, and the game doesn't even use VRS.
Doesn't need to
Every Crysis is a hardware killer. It shows that we began to have insufficent horse power in regard to modern software capabilities.
I mean in this day and age the games have been very unoptimised as directx12 wasnt out back then so all the strain is on one core. So im glad theyve managed to update it for the modern hardware :)
Tbh even if people hate crysis remastered on steam I’m fine cause it’s still crysis
Wouldn't say hardware killer the game was unoptimized
Well, another thing that’s changed is the standard of what we expect for frame rate and resolution. 1080p 30fps used to be the standard, now we’re expecting 4K 60 out of our games.
@@Slodsworth not everything can be solved with optimizing, amount of shader work going in cryengine 3 when its maxed out is insane, cryengine invented lot of things other engines have copied including voxel gi and image based lighting etc..
Does this version support stereoscopic 3D like the old gen versions? I found it a cool "tech demo" for the time but the low resolution and framerate made it pretty much unplayable. Would be cool with 2160p and 60fps I reckon.
Massive win for Xbox Series X.
Trilogie Runs best on Series X 😋
I completed the game and enjoyed it (series X). I had a couple of achievements to get and clicked replay mission - it wiped my save! Strange thing is i still have had my suit upgrades and weapon attachments. Looks like many people experienced this. it needs patching.
Dear DF, please put more emphasis on the benefits of higher FOV so these devs can consider balancing games around 95 FOV for the new consoles at least..lol
Not gonna happen. Most console games are played with the gamer sitting more than six feet away from the TV screen, at which point you're far enough away from the screen fields of view wider than 80 degrees look off.
The Crysis trilogy was updated on Xbox, they are native Series X|S games
Though like Halo MCC and Shadow of the Tomb Raider, they can still be played from an external hard drive
Strangely PS5 is still stuck with the PS4 versions, this also happened with Mass Effect Legendary Edition, dedicated Series X version, PS5 still using PS4 version
I want crysis 4...
Loved that you covered the last gen too thank you 👍
Once again XSX shows it's superiority. Sharper, smoother, VRR, dolby vision, dolby atmos and from a much smaller and more silent box. Both are good though.
No, no, no Superiority goes to PC!
🤦♂️ they stated literally no discernible difference
they re the same idiot .did you watch the video lol.the tflaps aren t helping anymore
@@TripieBluee pc is not a console and pc also has the worst version.
@@k2red648 I did watch the video. Sharper on XSX, no stutter + VRR. Nice try though
Crysis 2 and 3 are masterpieces. Highly underrated.
I would have loved to see a comparison between the Switch and XBOX One S. It's kind of crazy to think that both games run at 30fps. And the only real difference is the Switch having TAA and DRS range between 720p to 900p. It feels like some kind of black magic working under the hood of the Switch.
Pisses me off that the XSX and PS5 don’t have TAA.
Xbox one is running the pc version/remastered version. Switch is probably running the PS3/xbox 360 version
@@sarveshsivakumar6993 when you put it like that it does make a lot of sense as to how they got the game running on the switch. Not to mention the Nintendo switch itself compared to last generation hardware has 4 GB of RAM versus the 512mb on Xbox 360 (although it probably less than this because some of that ram is reserved for background tasks)
@@sarveshsivakumar6993 I mean, although based on the PS360-era game, it is MUCH improved: frame rate, resolution, AA, grass shaders + wind simulation, textures, filtrering (anisotropic) etc. It actually looks seriously impressive. very smooth, sharp and detailed.
After all this comprehensive coverage of C2 and C3 is it worth a quick revisit of the C1 remaster to see how that runs now after the patches?
what about the switch version?
Switch version and bs5 version are almost identical
@@shyamkumarsasi3577 what?
@@Yannis280 legit
@@Yannis280 he's major xbot with no logic at all.
anyway i wanna try this as soon as i finish Metroid Dread :D
Damm I was going to pick this up this week for my PS5, but I think I will wait to see if the checkpoint stutter gets addressed.
Cache paging issue they should be able to iron out via update.
I really enjoyed all the crysis games. Played on pc back in the day, but now I just do PS5/XBSX. looking forward to playing them all again.
@@rockapartie oh I played alot of halo on console before it came to PC. So I can get by on analog sticks.
Video description text -
"A game that *was* built"
*8 year old game and it still looks noticeably better on PC.*
*An adequately spec'd PC.
Depending on a specs of that PC :)
@Lov Mir Well of course a RX 580 would play the game better than the PS4. PS4 has a very slow Jaguar processor coupled with a pretty slow by today's standards 1.8tf GPU. Followed up by a archaic 5400RPM hard drive. All I can say is thank God we have moved on to decent specs in the new consoles.
@@XxViciousxX He said gtx 580, not rx 580 lol
@@RandomGamingMoments925 Regardless the guy has no idea what he's talking about. I remember him telling me the PS4 is faster than my laptop with a 6800m(when it actually sits right under a PS5/ Series X).
19:49 What happened to the voice? Who is even talking there, is there a 3rd person butting in?
Series X knocks the PS5 out the ball park yet again with its higher res, more stable FPS and it’s Dolby Vision and Atmos
Dude, I have a 2 TB NVME M2 7 GB/s read, sitting in my ps5 right now, who are you?
I mean it's a fact now that series x is da beast 💪💪💪
@@shyamkumarsasi3577 No! Don't talk like that, Me and the Sony gang will stop you!
This is my first time in a real console war, I'm so excited 😂
@@Lasse3 and? Still a piece of shit console with a good storage😂😂😂. I already had on my shop like 17 ps5 for repair and only a series s so yeah i love sony cuz ive been making great dough since the ps2 repairing their crap consoles especially ps3 and 4, yes the360 was crap too
Tempest engine is at least used more for games than Dolby Atmos. Dolby Atmos is rarely used.
Glad PS5 and Xbox series x both have an amazing experience. Even series s has a decent showing
Try The Riftbreaker, that game is so gorgeous it tanks the fps on Series X when things get crazy on screen. Wonderful game. Only 1 achievement left to get !
Yeah. Crysis looks good. But can it run Crysis?
Can it crysis run?
I finished Crysis 3 on the 360 back in the day on its hardest difficulty and I had a blast, but only now after watching this video did I realize how low performance the 7th gen console versions of this game were. I'd still play and enjoy any Crysis game on my 360 if that was all I had, but the remastered versions on the Xbox One and Series consoles are definitely the way to go these days. I wish the Xbox One X had a 60fps option like what happened in Halo Infinite where you could get a semi-locked 60fps at the cost of lower graphical fidelity. Performance has always been more important to me than graphics even as far back as the N64. When the Expansion Pak came out it was cool to see those extra details on my CRT, but if the game ran slow in that mode like how Castlevania and Star Wars Episode 1 Racer did then I'd just go back from 480i to 240p.
i respect your opinion but let's be honest the 7th generation both xbox 360 and ps3 they are suffering from frame rate issues from their beginning to their ending from 2006 to 2015 they are suffering from frame rate issues the main problem that the 7th generation was suffering its was there frame rate issues not the graphics the graphics on 7th generation was very good and very beautiful but the frame rate issues it wasn't stable at 30 frame per second for most popular the time but i watch video on UA-cam and i search on Google the video and Google they said crysis 3 on xbox 360 its runs at 1152x720p and thats mean cryisis 3 on xbox 360 its HD 720p resolution
@@stansmith7445 i mean this game with this strong graphics and strong engine can't be better than the pc version or 8th generation or 9th generation and xbox 360 he can handle this game with this graphics but not like the pc version or 8th generation or 9th generation to be better
@@tareksumayatarekmuhammadya1402 Well, to your credit as well as my own defense, I did not say that the 7th gen consoles ran the Crysis titles good. In fact, I said that I couldn't believe how low performance they were. So, considering what I originally said as well as your stance on the 7th generations console performance, there is no opinion to respect as we both agree on the subject here lol. I would still play the 360 versions IF that was all I had to choose from, but since the remastered versions exist on the One and Series consoles its a no-brainer to play those instead.
@@stansmith7445 I agree and disagree with your statement my friend. Unless you're trying to compare the PS3 and 360 to a really high end PC that not many people would be able or even willing to afford at the time, the 7th generation consoles held their own quite nicely all things considered. I've seen games look and run much worse on the PS4 and Xbox One due to development issues or publisher negligence. The final years of the PS3 and 360 being truly active pushed them farther than most would've thought possible. The fact that either of them could run Crysis at all is something to congratulate them for, not ridicule them. Instead, it would be more proper to acknowledge the fact that they had limitations and, as such, were not perfect but were serviceable to those who could have them over an overpriced and overengineered PC rig.