I don't recall a message ever popping up about autofocus when plugging it into a monitor. Never seen a difference with the autofocus. Used this cam tons of times with a field monitor. I actually have five of these and use them to multi-cam live stream sports. Amazing camera for that kind of thing.
Nice and quick round-up. I actually knew about two out of three of those. I have the FZ1000 which also does 4K crop, but if I had to replace it tomorrow, the FZ2500 is what I'd get. As long as it's still working, however, I'll stick to it, regardless of the occasionally annoying 30-minute 4K recording limit that the 2500 doesn't have.
My own main gripes: 1. The viewfinder in Movie mode does not show both shutter speed and aperture. What's up with that? I shoot in S (as noted below), so I have to switch back to S mode to check aperture, then back to Movie mode, which is clumsy. 2. Diffraction sets in by f/8, so I try to shoot just at f/5.6 for best results, which is limiting. 3. The menu system has gotten seriously clumsy. 10 screens in a single section, really?! Otherwise, FWIW, my own FZ2500 stabilizes 4K video quite well. The main limitation in 4K action shooting is the max 30 fps frame rate, so I normally shoot action sports in 1080p60 for smoother results. Another important factor is shutter speed. For best results in 1080p60 mode I use a shutter speed of 1/125 (2x the frame rate), which the ND filter makes possible in bright light outdoors. But these are quibbles-the FZ2500 is a great video camera.
Thanks for this video! These are very well researched and experienced tips on the camera. I just found the existence of this camera recently and I wanted to pair this up with my Panasonic GH4 so I can have a good dedicated Servo Zoom Camera. This the type of information I would have never found on any other blogs or video so thanks for the info!
GREAT content and informative. Yes, the Lumix FZ range hasn't had a good run with the IOS. However, almost everyone who buys one overlooks the internal microphone, IOS and auto-focus issues when they see the staggering image quality. Lumix don't cut any corners with glass, and the lens are as good as they come. The 1080 is utterly brilliant, and the 4K also.
I have one myself. I shoot mostly jpgs with it. IMHO, the out of the box factory settings over sharpen the jpgs. Fortunately, sharpening can be adjusted in camera. I adjust images a small amount in post, to good advantage. Video right there to capture action with the red button. There is no perfect camera, but in bright sun, this one comes close!
Make sure the Video is in M mode in the menu then change the shutter speed and VOILA....much better. You can even change it to Cini V or Cini D for different applications.
Thanks. I think about the 1 inch sensor compared to an aps-c sensor camera. I like the idea of one lens with a good zoom range. I wonder, what do others think.
Good tips and points I haven't heard elsewhere..so thanks. still vacillating between FZ 2500 and (back to) GH4. Cost of various lenses always causes heart palpitation. Need high zoom to film airplanes for a documentary. Does GH4 offer better IBIS? and auto focus?
Good video. I also have the Fz2500 & have a few ' wishes / complaints. I'm more a ' stills ' shooter & would like to see some additions included in a future Fz2500 II. I've seen some photos from the Sony mark 4 one in. sensor bridge camera & some of the images seem a bit sharper than the Fz's. It has a better sensor & the Zeis lens. In these areas I'd like to see Panasonic, if not exceed - then at lest match the Sony. It also should have dust & some weather sealing. After 2 1/2 years I can look down into the lens & see dust particles. Because they are not near the sensor they don't seem to show up on images. A camera tech guy said that when the camera turns on & the lens extends - this movement causes a suction effect inside that will ' pull ' in dust particles inside of the lens. There are so many features / aspects of the Fz that I really enjoy - some of which you mentioned - which makes it an all around ' fun ' camera to use. Thanks again.
@@GeekyNerdyTechy With my Fz I learned from the local tech fellow that the dust in my lens doesn't result in any untoward effect on my photos. He - the tech - took a shot of some orange paper he had - played it back on the camera's monitor - then zoomed in x 16 & used his finger to move the image around until he could see there were no ' spots ' to be seen & said, " No dust on the sensor. " He added , after a test of looking through the view finder at a white piece of paper held close to the lens, that he saw no spots either. I had purchased from e-bay a panasonic service manual & had e-mailed a copy to the tech guy, who stated that the lens assembly was quite complex & that he wanted no part in taking it apart. My choice now was did I want to send it to the Panasonic service center in Texas & pay $150 ~ $200 ( plus ship ) to have the dust removed - & hope they calibrated the reassembly spot - on so that the focus was accurate - and then because of no sealing have more dust get inside eventually ! This is why I am adamant that any 'future' high end quality fixed lens bridge camera - like the Fz - ' MUST ' have dust sealing from the factory. With that said, I wouldn't be too worried about any ill effects from the dust in yours either. Ray
My take: FZ1000 is a great still camera that also does very good video. FZ2500 is a great video camera that also does very good stills. I have both, and I grab the FZ1000 to shoot stills. The lens is spectacularly good. The FZ2500 lens is more than good enough for video, but falls short of the FZ1000 for stills.
the way the camera kept losing focus i guessed you are using a panasonic. And at 2:00 min mark when you said u are using G85 i laughed. Seriously... for video centric cameras, these cameras have horrible autofocus.
how is it for "sports" video? Distance I will be filming from is about 80' from the camera +/- 10 ft (water sports behind boat). Biggest concern? Auto focus? From what I have seen in comments, and personal pref, I would be filming at 1080p
The AF is good when it comes to shooting photos. Some people seem to think that the photos look soft though. I am not a photographer other that's one of those things that might come with more experience with other cameras. The contrast-detection autofocus is far better for photos than video.
Hi. Probably no one will see this. But there is some options i can buy for starting my photography hobby again. I see this camera is good price and performance. My other option is Sony Alpha ZV-E10L APS-C 16-50 mm lens. This one is bridge camera and I don't wanna spend a lot on lenses. But the Sony has better sensor. And it's newer. Idk if I'll be happy with the Panasonic. It is heavier and so hard to carry maybe. But i like the zoom and macro options in one camera. Any help about my situation ?
If you dont want to spend much on lenses, you are better off with a bridge camera. This lens is going to be better quality than most of the cheap Sony lenses.
Ta for the information, there is so much to consider when on the lookout for a camera, would you consider making a video about what first camera one should consider as an inexpensive starter for shooting the odd short video for a UA-camr like me, instead of using the Logitech videocam. The ring lights arrived today. Whoo Hoo. Cheers.
I would probably recommend getting the original Panasonic G9 and a lens that would suit what it is you need. The G9 will be a better photographic camera, but this is a solid video performer. If you're shooting longer form videos, this is a decent choice but for smaller video bursts, I would choose the G9 over this (or a GH5).
Wish panasonic would bring out a camera that didn't hunt for focus :( Your G85 was doing all thought your video :(. Only thing stopping me from buying a panasonic camera.
Get a Gh5, see my tutorial video on it. It works great with very little issues. I use it all of the time normally. I should have shot this video with the Gh5 haha
Thanks for the review.:)There are good plenty reviews for the new Lumix 90/95. There a little crop for 4K as well but no recording time limit.I still believe Bridge/Superzoom cameras are good options for people who want to jump slowly in photography without spending too much in accessories (lenses,..). My first digital camera was bridge before having a DSLR.What do you think about a potential replacement for the Lumix FZ2000/2500, a new FZ3000/3500?What specs would you like to see in a such camera, a real Hybrid for hybrid users (Stills-Photo and Videos)?What do you think about the G90/95?Should a FZ3000/3500 looks like a G90/95 with fixed lens, but similar specs and body design?(Probably the body would be a little bigger to accommodate the lens + focal length)Why not put a M4/3rd sensor in a FZ3000/3500?Let us know what you think about this.Thanks.
Isaac Holyk Wow! That does make a big difference. I think when I checked it wasn’t on the Atomos approved list. For a super zoom I’m using a PX 270. It has a great zoom, auto focus colour and detail, but it is not 4K and it is noisy in the shadows.
Hi. A bit late to the party but,,,,I have used mine with an Atomos Ninja Blade for the last three years no problem, it has a clean HDMI out. You have to press record on the Atomos as well as the camera, just wish it had a camera trigger.
@@bonjen1 Really? That changes everything. I have a couple of GH5’s when hooked up to the Ninja V the HDMI works a treat. I also have a Ninja Blade and a Samurai Blade the absence of a trigger is not so much of a problem as I normally shoot long form stuff: live theatre, concerts and dance shows.
4 роки тому+1
fz 2500 /2000 is a great camera I have also fz1000 and other types of brand names I can only write everything I use work great . you will always be able find something you missing , you never find the perfect camera. but if you get money from someboddy to write negativ ofcourse you can find more . but for now Panasonic fz 2500 /2000 work great . sorry for you
recently I have purchased PANASONIC FZ2500. During low light 4k video of this camera is useless and autofocus is hunting during THE day and evening . So I HAVE TO SELL THIS CAMERA' I HAVE USED THE FOLLOWING CAMERA, PANASONIC FZ200 ,FZ 1000 AND FZ300 FOR MY UA-cam CHANNEL
Nonsense. It has an excellent 24-480mm lens. You would need at least one zoom lens plus the actual camera body to get that. Even if you want with the cheapest Sony APS-C gear and got the ZV-E10 for $700 and the Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-f/6.3 for $700, thats $500 more and I'll take the Leica lens on the 2500 all day over the Tamron kit lens which is trash. The 18-200mm Sony E PZ with OSS is about on par with the lens on the 2500....it's $1,200. So thats $2k for your camera and lens. But the ZV-E10 doesnt have IBIS, an EVF, nor a fantastic 6 stop ND filter built in. The FZ2500 is a steal for the price.
@@GeekyNerdyTechy I had the G9, the AF is awful and the pulsing is absurd. Dont get that with the 2500. Besides, to get the same 24-480mm focal length in M43, you are spending a TON of money. The Zuiko 150-400mm is $7k lol
I don't recall a message ever popping up about autofocus when plugging it into a monitor. Never seen a difference with the autofocus. Used this cam tons of times with a field monitor. I actually have five of these and use them to multi-cam live stream sports. Amazing camera for that kind of thing.
Same ( not for the multi cam)
Nice and quick round-up. I actually knew about two out of three of those. I have the FZ1000 which also does 4K crop, but if I had to replace it tomorrow, the FZ2500 is what I'd get. As long as it's still working, however, I'll stick to it, regardless of the occasionally annoying 30-minute 4K recording limit that the 2500 doesn't have.
Thanks for the overview about the camera. What in need is a good camera for shooting video. This will be useful for it.
My own main gripes:
1. The viewfinder in Movie mode does not show both shutter speed and aperture. What's up with that? I shoot in S (as noted below), so I have to switch back to S mode to check aperture, then back to Movie mode, which is clumsy.
2. Diffraction sets in by f/8, so I try to shoot just at f/5.6 for best results, which is limiting.
3. The menu system has gotten seriously clumsy. 10 screens in a single section, really?!
Otherwise, FWIW, my own FZ2500 stabilizes 4K video quite well. The main limitation in 4K action shooting is the max 30 fps frame rate, so I normally shoot action sports in 1080p60 for smoother results.
Another important factor is shutter speed. For best results in 1080p60 mode I use a shutter speed of 1/125 (2x the frame rate), which the ND filter makes possible in bright light outdoors.
But these are quibbles-the FZ2500 is a great video camera.
Thanks for this video! These are very well researched and experienced tips on the camera. I just found the existence of this camera recently and I wanted to pair this up with my Panasonic GH4 so I can have a good dedicated Servo Zoom Camera. This the type of information I would have never found on any other blogs or video so thanks for the info!
GREAT content and informative. Yes, the Lumix FZ range hasn't had a good run with the IOS. However, almost everyone who buys one overlooks the internal microphone, IOS and auto-focus issues when they see the staggering image quality. Lumix don't cut any corners with glass, and the lens are as good as they come. The 1080 is utterly brilliant, and the 4K also.
I have one myself. I shoot mostly jpgs with it. IMHO, the out of the box factory settings over sharpen the jpgs. Fortunately, sharpening can be adjusted in camera. I adjust images a small amount in post, to good advantage. Video right there to capture action with the red button. There is no perfect camera, but in bright sun, this one comes close!
I understand that in 4K you still have image stabilisation but only optical not digital ?
Make sure the Video is in M mode in the menu then change the shutter speed and VOILA....much better. You can even change it to Cini V or Cini D for different applications.
Can you shoot a shallow depth of field? If so, how? What are the two manual
rings for?
Thanks. I think about the 1 inch sensor compared to an aps-c sensor camera. I like the idea of one lens with a good zoom range. I wonder, what do others think.
For photography or videography?
Good tips and points I haven't heard elsewhere..so thanks. still vacillating between FZ 2500 and (back to) GH4. Cost of various lenses always causes heart palpitation. Need high zoom to film airplanes for a documentary. Does GH4 offer better IBIS? and auto focus?
Good video. I also have the Fz2500 & have a few ' wishes / complaints. I'm more a ' stills ' shooter & would like to see some additions included in a future Fz2500 II. I've seen some photos from the Sony mark 4 one in. sensor bridge camera & some of the images seem a bit sharper than the Fz's. It has a better sensor & the Zeis lens. In these areas I'd like to see Panasonic, if not exceed - then at lest match the Sony. It also should have dust & some weather sealing. After 2 1/2 years I can look down into the lens & see dust particles. Because they are not near the sensor they don't seem to show up on images. A camera tech guy said that when the camera turns on & the lens extends - this movement causes a suction effect inside that will ' pull ' in dust particles inside of the lens. There are so many features / aspects of the Fz that I really enjoy - some of which you mentioned - which makes it an all around ' fun ' camera to use. Thanks again.
I see the same dust in mine too! I couldn't believe it when I first saw it. I don't know if there's any way to fix it either? :(
@@GeekyNerdyTechy With my Fz I learned from the local tech fellow that the dust in my lens doesn't result in any untoward effect on my photos. He - the tech - took a shot of some orange paper he had - played it back on the camera's monitor - then zoomed in x 16 & used his finger to move the image around until he could see there were no ' spots ' to be seen & said, " No dust on the sensor. " He added , after a test of looking through the view finder at a white piece of paper held close to the lens, that he saw no spots either. I had purchased from e-bay a panasonic service manual & had e-mailed a copy to the tech guy, who stated that the lens assembly was quite complex & that he wanted no part in taking it apart. My choice now was did I want to send it to the Panasonic service center in Texas & pay $150 ~ $200 ( plus ship ) to have the dust removed - & hope they calibrated the reassembly spot - on so that the focus was accurate - and then because of no sealing have more dust get inside eventually ! This is why I am adamant that any 'future' high end quality fixed lens bridge camera - like the Fz - ' MUST ' have dust sealing from the factory. With that said, I wouldn't be too worried about any ill effects from the dust in yours either. Ray
My take:
FZ1000 is a great still camera that also does very good video.
FZ2500 is a great video camera that also does very good stills.
I have both, and I grab the FZ1000 to shoot stills. The lens is spectacularly good.
The FZ2500 lens is more than good enough for video, but falls short of the FZ1000 for stills.
i think no matter what you get camera, car, gun, anything you'll be happy at first, but will complain later. i do it all the time.
You know what else sucks Shaneo? Having to own a heater mate, lol... That focus hunt is noticeable
Yeah, it's not as stable as the GH5 or FZ2500 but that said it's no big deal unless you're looking for it. :-)
the way the camera kept losing focus i guessed you are using a panasonic. And at 2:00 min mark when you said u are using G85 i laughed. Seriously... for video centric cameras, these cameras have horrible autofocus.
It's also a 7 year old camera or something haha
how is it for "sports" video? Distance I will be filming from is about 80' from the camera +/- 10 ft (water sports behind boat). Biggest concern? Auto focus? From what I have seen in comments, and personal pref, I would be filming at 1080p
My FZ2500 is great for action photography. I mostly shoot 1080p60 at 1/125 sec.
Does anyone still own this exact mode of camera? If so, I would love a few pointers
I just bought fz2000 for 375$ , good deal?
If that’s the same as the 2500, yep!
Should I go for this camera or a M50 + 75x300 lens for the same price? photography most of the time.
Thank you. Hope there's not much issue for photography. what are your views for its zoom and af tracking?
The AF is good when it comes to shooting photos. Some people seem to think that the photos look soft though. I am not a photographer other that's one of those things that might come with more experience with other cameras. The contrast-detection autofocus is far better for photos than video.
Hi. Probably no one will see this. But there is some options i can buy for starting my photography hobby again. I see this camera is good price and performance. My other option is Sony Alpha ZV-E10L APS-C 16-50 mm lens. This one is bridge camera and I don't wanna spend a lot on lenses. But the Sony has better sensor. And it's newer. Idk if I'll be happy with the Panasonic. It is heavier and so hard to carry maybe. But i like the zoom and macro options in one camera. Any help about my situation ?
If you dont want to spend much on lenses, you are better off with a bridge camera. This lens is going to be better quality than most of the cheap Sony lenses.
Ta for the information, there is so much to consider when on the lookout for a camera, would you consider making a video about what first camera one should consider as an inexpensive starter for shooting the odd short video for a UA-camr like me, instead of using the Logitech videocam. The ring lights arrived today. Whoo Hoo. Cheers.
My only complaint on my fz2500 is that it has no usb tether function on mac, or I just dont know how to do it.
You can transfer video right from the camera to your phone and you use a media reader lightning cable
Great video,thanks for share.
thanks for this !
Would you reccomend it for an airshow?
I would probably recommend getting the original Panasonic G9 and a lens that would suit what it is you need. The G9 will be a better photographic camera, but this is a solid video performer. If you're shooting longer form videos, this is a decent choice but for smaller video bursts, I would choose the G9 over this (or a GH5).
thank you so much @@GeekyNerdyTechy
An honest review. Thanks.
No problem!
Hello sir, which format I use for wedding video in india via fz 2500 lumix.pls reply
Do you mean between .MOV and .Mp4 or are you talking frame rates? I am not sure what you are asking sorry.
so should i go with fz1000 then???
For stills, FZ1000.
For video, FZ2500.
Is the auto focus motor really noisy too on yours Shane? Like, so noisy you can hear it moving on a quiet video? 🤔
Not in mine.
@1:55 @2:44 yay, horrible G85 autofocus on prominent display. why cant panasonic get this right? JFC.
At 1:57, the above video goes out of focus.
Yeah it'll do that with these old cameras. Try their G9II or GH7.
Wish panasonic would bring out a camera that didn't hunt for focus :( Your G85 was doing all thought your video :(. Only thing stopping me from buying a panasonic camera.
Get a Gh5, see my tutorial video on it. It works great with very little issues. I use it all of the time normally. I should have shot this video with the Gh5 haha
@@GeekyNerdyTechy Yeah i watched that too. It's gonna be A6400 or the Gh5, A6400 has no ibs.
My own FZ2500 does an excellent job of focus tracking on outdoor action sports.
Thanks for the review.:)There are good plenty reviews for the new Lumix 90/95. There a little crop for 4K as well but no recording time limit.I still believe Bridge/Superzoom cameras are good options for people who want to jump slowly in photography without spending too much in accessories (lenses,..). My first digital camera was bridge before having a DSLR.What do you think about a potential replacement for the Lumix FZ2000/2500, a new FZ3000/3500?What specs would you like to see in a such camera, a real Hybrid for hybrid users (Stills-Photo and Videos)?What do you think about the G90/95?Should a FZ3000/3500 looks like a G90/95 with fixed lens, but similar specs and body design?(Probably the body would be a little bigger to accommodate the lens + focal length)Why not put a M4/3rd sensor in a FZ3000/3500?Let us know what you think about this.Thanks.
if oyou put a monitor and the hdmi putputs only 8 bit, the focus is just fine. only in 10 bit not. i know this suchs :)
great video, just spot on
I assume you shot this on a panasonic as several times the focus shifted on your face! your eyes pop in and out of focus..hunting is bad!
I almost bought one of these. The deal breaker for me was, you can’t record to an external recorder. I love the super zoom.
Isaac Holyk Wow! That does make a big difference. I think when I checked it wasn’t on the Atomos approved list. For a super zoom I’m using a PX 270. It has a great zoom, auto focus colour and detail, but it is not 4K and it is noisy in the shadows.
Isaac Holyk I look forward to your comparison.
Hi. A bit late to the party but,,,,I have used mine with an Atomos Ninja Blade for the last three years no problem, it has a clean HDMI out. You have to press record on the Atomos as well as the camera, just wish it had a camera trigger.
@@bonjen1 Really? That changes everything. I have a couple of GH5’s when hooked up to the Ninja V the HDMI works a treat. I also have a Ninja Blade and a Samurai Blade the absence of a trigger is not so much of a problem as I normally shoot long form stuff: live theatre, concerts and dance shows.
fz 2500 /2000 is a great camera I have also fz1000 and other types of brand names I can only write everything I use work great . you will always be able find something you missing , you never find the perfect camera. but if you get money from someboddy to write negativ ofcourse you can find more . but for now Panasonic fz 2500 /2000 work great . sorry for you
recently I have purchased PANASONIC FZ2500. During low light 4k video of this camera is useless and autofocus is hunting during THE day and evening . So I HAVE TO SELL THIS CAMERA'
I HAVE USED THE FOLLOWING CAMERA, PANASONIC FZ200 ,FZ 1000 AND FZ300 FOR MY UA-cam CHANNEL
Rolling shutter is proving to be an issue
Guy complains about 3 things he don't like about this camera, yet he keeps it for more than 3 years, I mean, you had the time to sell it right away.
haha. Yeah, some would consider listing a follow up to a full review video helpful. Except you, of course. I mean, you're a legend.
Nice 👍
Thanks
3 Minor Caveats😂
Yep, it is now 2023 and the FZ2500 is up to 900 smackaroos here in the US, not worth it for this kind of device especially in 2023.
Agreed. You'd be better off buying a GH5II, G9, or anything else more modern.
Nonsense. It has an excellent 24-480mm lens. You would need at least one zoom lens plus the actual camera body to get that. Even if you want with the cheapest Sony APS-C gear and got the ZV-E10 for $700 and the Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-f/6.3 for $700, thats $500 more and I'll take the Leica lens on the 2500 all day over the Tamron kit lens which is trash. The 18-200mm Sony E PZ with OSS is about on par with the lens on the 2500....it's $1,200. So thats $2k for your camera and lens. But the ZV-E10 doesnt have IBIS, an EVF, nor a fantastic 6 stop ND filter built in. The FZ2500 is a steal for the price.
@@GeekyNerdyTechy I had the G9, the AF is awful and the pulsing is absurd. Dont get that with the 2500. Besides, to get the same 24-480mm focal length in M43, you are spending a TON of money. The Zuiko 150-400mm is $7k lol
I have the FZ2500 and I use it for short films and I looks great with the SCORP 2 gimbal but I do use my 4K camcorder or the stable 4k videos