I shoot video in 1080p with my FZ300 all the time. I warm the image up with white balance. Making sure there's adequate light is necessary. I own more than a dozen cameras, but the FZ300 is simply too easy to shoot video with. I'm happy with it.
Useful video Thankyou. I just got delivered the FZ300 (Fz330 here in UK), but reassuring you’ve confirmed the reasons I chose it. Generally better quality images and video than other budget ones checked, pretty compact size, decent enough zoom, articulating screen, nice other features (can see me trying 4k video picture grab on my son’s volleyball playing.). Weather resistant is great for travel too. It seems to fare very well against the 2500 while being the useful all rounder. I don’t mind the lesser low light performance for sensor size given all the upsides for me. Time to give it a try !
@@Bjjgg-t1z certainly the autofocus isn't the best in the world, you need to experiment a lot with the settings. the crucial settings from my experience is to keep the button on AFS/AFF position instead of AFC and the metering must be on entire area not spot or center.
Have the FZ2500 for 7 years now, and it is a workhorse. ND filter and larger sensor make this a very usable all-in-one 8 years after release. The video and audio is much better on the 2500, which I need. Use external Rode Mic.
Great video thank you.. I pre-ordered the FZ2500 back in 2016 due to the fact I owned from 2006 onwards, fz30 , fz100 fz200, fz1000 and now the fz2500. I'm months away of being 70 years old and once used slr's with interchangeable lenses. I knew no better until the lumix fz30. As a motorsports photographer (drag racing) I had to get use to the fact "one lens" does it all. Long story short. My forte in motorsports photography is blurred background. The fz2500 with the built in ND filter has produced some fantastic results, results I could no achieve by screw on the lens filters.. I ditched the slr's in favour for the bridge. I would buy without a doubt a new Lumix if Panasonic would build a micro four thirds bridge, but that dream is long gone..
Hi there. Wow, you certainly have a long history with Panasonic cameras. Your field sounds very interesting with motor sports. Did you use manual focus as I would think the slower AF on some of these cameras might be difficult to pick up such fast action? But yes, a micro 4/3 bridge seems like a distant dream. For now, this is what we have! Thanks so much for sharing and for your comment
Have the Fz 300 great in good lighting situattions. Also have micro four thirds OM 5. Shooting in higher ISO no comparison. Fz 300 great bang for buck! I agree with your comment at end that newer bridge cameras with the newer technology could make buying cameras with multiple lens obsolete. Could cut into profits for camera companies.Also newer editing software can help de noise on higher ISO with FZ 300
Excellent video. I have been looking at both these cameras and being mostly photography biased with very little interest in the video side, I think the FZ330 will be for me. The only draw back is the saturation, which I believe can be corrected in the phot styles. Many thanks.
Good comparison, thank you. I think the FZ300 is for me and it suits my budget for a bridge camera. I need to shop around now for the best deal, initial shopping comparisons show very little competition in pricing, are Panasonic and \ or retailers manipulating the prices here in the UK (would not be surprised if they were - we are regularly abused in this way). All of that said I have the option of looking at other cameras\suppliers.
I really appreciate this comparison. I was looking to trade my Sony a6000 for a bridge camera with a do it all lens. I did not enjoy changing lenses, always worried about the sensor being compromised. I finally decided to go with the fz2500, mainly because of the bigger sensor size, in hopes of better picture quality. It arrived today, so super excited to learn all the settings and hopefully get some decent results with it. The Sony rx10 iv was just out of my price range, so I decided that the fx2500 would be my next best option. Thanks for reviewing these older cameras that still seem relevant.
Hi there! Best of luck with your 2500. You may want to check out my video on the FZ80 as well, (even though you didnt buy that model) because it goes into depth on some of the special features of the cameras (both have them the 2500 and 80) that you may be interested in. Thanks for the comment!
I got one and was always thinking if it was my not knowing about cameras enough to differentiate a good picture from average one. I thought it was me thinking the pictures of the 300 was very good. But you made it clear the 300 it’s a very good camera for daily use. Pictures are very sharp.
The CONTRAST DETECT AF is pretty poor compared to Canon, Nikon and Sony's PHASE DETECT AF. These Point and shoot Superzooms do really well with MF-Manual Focus and changing the Aperture/F Stop value. Shutter speed is vital too. The stills are far better in MF than AF. I have the newer FZ1000II and the AF is pretty disappointing but the MF is superb. I can get sweet Macro pics, sweet close ups, very nice landscape photos and brilliant Portraits in MF.
Great comparison! Why do you think there is no fz3000? It's a pity, isnt it? I have a fz1000 with some problems and i have been thinking on fz2000, but i dont know if it is too old in year 2024. Whay do you think? Exist one bridge camera capable of 4K 60fps?
Hi there. Thanks for the compliment! Yes it is a shame there is no FZ3000 but Panasonic just came out with a new superzoom the FZ80D so that gives us hope that maybe they will refresh the other lines! I don't think the FZ2000/2500 is too old because there aren't any similar models really besides the RX10IV, which is the only other 1" sensor high quality bridge camera. So just as long as you understand the plusses and minuses of the camera there is no reason why you can't successfully use it in 2024. Thanks for the comment!
It would be great to see Phase Detect Auto Focus, if possible in a bridge camera. My only real complaint with the 2500 is the Focus. I often drop to manual just to make sure. Also use the HC-X1500 camcorder with the XLR audio/Light handle and external shotgun mic. The auto-focus and audio on the HC-X1500 are much better than the 2500, as well as the smooth zoom in/out.
Hi. How do you find the image quality of the Fz2500 and HC X1500 compares with each other? Which camera do you prefer? I have the x1500 also and was wondering if I should get the FZ2500 for the 1 inch sensor. Thankyou
@Doug-y2v The HC-X1500 has better video resolution and rates, but is newer. The IS and AutoFocus on the HC is better. If in a well lit scene, the HC is fine. The FZ2500 is dated. I now have a G9M2 which is great for photo and video. It just lacks the XLR inputs, but I could buy yet another gadget. The G9M2 has MFT sensor and is real nice. I like the convenience of the 2500, but if I needed more low light video capability I might look at the G9M2 or even GH7 if you need the streaming. I did also get the 100-400 (200-800 35mm equivalent) lense for the G9M2. That is mainly for stills of wildlife.
Great video good content, these Panasonic bridge cameras are superb, very easy to take great videos and photos with minimal effort, I own the fz1000 original, thinking of upgrading to the 2500 for more video features 😁😂
I love your content, but I must say: don't know about the 2500, but the 300 has an HDR effect (aside from built-in HDR), which limits you somewhat because of the fixed ISO400, but provides great results for blown out skies. :)
Update: I just bought the FZ2000 because my FZ300 was ruinted by the warranty service here in Hungary (sad, huh?) and Panasonic ceased the model. Anyways, I can confirm the mode (Scene: HYDN) is available in the FZ2000 as well - helping me out with the blown-out skies.
Great comparison! I find the video when zoomed in on both of these to be unusable. There is a small micro jitter that gives me anxiety when watching. Ive noticed most bridge cameras with large telephoto lens do this. I dont know of any that have solid stabilisation like what I have on my G9ii. And the Panasonic vx-1 handicam has amazing stabilisation, I just wish they could have the same stabe in these other cameras. I would love to see a new version of the fz80 with rock solid stabe. I think the manufacturers think we dont care about bridge cameras any more or handy cams but I love them!
Hi there! Thanks for the comment. I would agree at the long end, the stabilization isn't perfect. I am actually working on a WXf1 (same as VX-1) video to test the stabilization as well.
@@techtoremember8096 cool man I look forward to watching it. The vx-1 is an amazing tool for capturing random moments, I’m not sure why they seemed to have stopped making handy cams. I had the hx1500 and compared it to the vx-1 and was surprised how good the vx-1 holds up to its bigger more expensive brother. If only the vx-1 could do 10bit vlog and higher frame rates it would be an amazing tool
The stabilization on both cameras in 1080p is close, with the edge going to the FZ300. Its a bit easier stabilizing a smaller sensor so the 300 gets the edge but they are both good and very close.
Yes that crop really ruins the wide angle. Of course, you get more reach at telephoto but I agree, its discouraging. Hope you enjoy your 300 and thanks for the comment!
We want better bridges, I don't know why they do not simply use theese same bodies and introduce phone's sensors and processors on it... but I suspect that yes, as you said, they only want to sell expensive glasses and FF bodies, and the rest just go for the phones :( imagine something like a littya900 sensor with that fz2500 body and optics... just will destroy the micro43/APSC/FF market for consumer use
At the approx 2 min marker you said that the FZ2500 which was released in 2016 had an older version with the FZ1000 II... how so cause the FZ1000 II wasn't released until 2019 so how can it be older?
Hi there I do not have a review of 70, however the 80 and 70 are very similar,. the big difference is the video resolution. The 80 can shoot in 4k/30 and the 70 is restricted to 1080p
370 / 5 000 Hi, you helped me a lot in choosing a camera, I was wondering between Sony RX10 Mark3 and Sony RX10 Mark4, I chose RX10 Mark3, great camera, but I miss a little tilting screen from the side down and I'm thinking about Lumix FZ2000..? I'm mainly interested in image quality and nice background cutout, unless you know another camera model with a good zoom. Greetings Przemek from Poland!
Well, they are both good cameras. Will give about the same amount of background blur. I do think the Sony has a better picture as you can see from my video but the Panasonic has more features. So its a personal decision! Both good cameras.. Hello from Poland and thanks for reaching out!
I tried to answer you 2x but youtube keep deleting it... I will buy a sony a57 for a good price, do you think it is a good camera? i`m starting in photography
Hi there the Sony a57 is a very old camera with A mount lenses that are no longer made It has very old technology and I think you can get a more modern camera for a similar price
I did a review of the SX70 which is the successor to the 60hs and I really like the FZ300 more than than the 70 which means I would like it even more than the 60! I think the FZ300 delivers better image quality, low light and stabilization but its only 1/2 the zoom range of the Canons. Most of the time, however, 600mm is more than enough unless you are doing serious birding etc.
The RX10IV is my favorite bridge camera in terms of image quality, features etc. but that is also older. Unfortunately it seems that the manufacturers have abandoned these kind of cameras and that is why they are on the older side ..they have not yet had any replacements! If you want something more modern , you'll have to go with a mirrorless camera and interchangeable lenses but there are many people who still prefer the all in one design and that is why they have a following.
Actually the video is correct as Post focus is a form of focus stacking-both accomplish the same result. One does it in camera, the other through software. Nice try. Oh maybe you should concentrate on correcting your grammar as your message has a run on sentence.
In photo, most bridge cameras perform well, but when you go to video 4K, ALL suck, they are a world away, not even near of what any mft can give with a cheap lens (lets not tal about leica lenses), I've tried half a dozen of them, all returned to the sellers, when you later do a digital 2X zoom in FCPX, the deficiencies get hugely amplified. Shooting family videos?, OK, but do not go further than that...and I include the Sony Rx 10 IV. Half a century working in the field gives me a good perspective.... www.youtube.com/@CarloFerraro
I shoot video in 1080p with my FZ300 all the time. I warm the image up with white balance. Making sure there's adequate light is necessary. I own more than a dozen cameras, but the FZ300 is simply too easy to shoot video with. I'm happy with it.
Useful video Thankyou. I just got delivered the FZ300 (Fz330 here in UK), but reassuring you’ve confirmed the reasons I chose it. Generally better quality images and video than other budget ones checked, pretty compact size, decent enough zoom, articulating screen, nice other features (can see me trying 4k video picture grab on my son’s volleyball playing.). Weather resistant is great for travel too. It seems to fare very well against the 2500 while being the useful all rounder. I don’t mind the lesser low light performance for sensor size given all the upsides for me. Time to give it a try !
The video quality in 4K from the FZ300 is out of this world consider how small the sensor is and almost 10 years old!
Absolutely!
The video on the fz300 is faulty. It will lose focus in the middle of a video. Unless i was doing something wrong
@@Bjjgg-t1z certainly the autofocus isn't the best in the world, you need to experiment a lot with the settings. the crucial settings from my experience is to keep the button on AFS/AFF position instead of AFC and the metering must be on entire area not spot or center.
Have the FZ2500 for 7 years now, and it is a workhorse. ND filter and larger sensor make this a very usable all-in-one 8 years after release. The video and audio is much better on the 2500, which I need. Use external Rode Mic.
Great video thank you.. I pre-ordered the FZ2500 back in 2016 due to the fact I owned from 2006 onwards, fz30 , fz100 fz200, fz1000 and now the fz2500. I'm months away of being 70 years old and once used slr's with interchangeable lenses. I knew no better until the lumix fz30. As a motorsports photographer (drag racing) I had to get use to the fact "one lens" does it all. Long story short. My forte in motorsports photography is blurred background. The fz2500 with the built in ND filter has produced some fantastic results, results I could no achieve by screw on the lens filters.. I ditched the slr's in favour for the bridge. I would buy without a doubt a new Lumix if Panasonic would build a micro four thirds bridge, but that dream is long gone..
Hi there. Wow, you certainly have a long history with Panasonic cameras. Your field sounds very interesting with motor sports. Did you use manual focus as I would think the slower AF on some of these cameras might be difficult to pick up such fast action? But yes, a micro 4/3 bridge seems like a distant dream. For now, this is what we have! Thanks so much for sharing and for your comment
Have the Fz 300 great in good lighting situattions. Also have micro four thirds OM 5. Shooting in higher ISO no comparison. Fz 300 great bang for buck! I agree with your comment at end that newer bridge cameras with the newer technology could make buying cameras with multiple lens obsolete. Could cut into profits for camera companies.Also newer editing software can help de noise on higher ISO with FZ 300
I love the FZ300, it was one of the cameras on my recent film Subway Shark. I don't think there's a better camera in that price point
Excellent video. I have been looking at both these cameras and being mostly photography biased with very little interest in the video side, I think the FZ330 will be for me. The only draw back is the saturation, which I believe can be corrected in the phot styles. Many thanks.
Thanks for your comment !
Good comparison, thank you. I think the FZ300 is for me and it suits my budget for a bridge camera.
I need to shop around now for the best deal, initial shopping comparisons show very little competition in pricing, are Panasonic and \ or retailers manipulating the prices here in the UK (would not be surprised if they were - we are regularly abused in this way).
All of that said I have the option of looking at other cameras\suppliers.
Using FZ2500 and wishing they can do an upgrade.
I really appreciate this comparison. I was looking to trade my Sony a6000 for a bridge camera with a do it all lens. I did not enjoy changing lenses, always worried about the sensor being compromised. I finally decided to go with the fz2500, mainly because of the bigger sensor size, in hopes of better picture quality. It arrived today, so super excited to learn all the settings and hopefully get some decent results with it. The Sony rx10 iv was just out of my price range, so I decided that the fx2500 would be my next best option. Thanks for reviewing these older cameras that still seem relevant.
Hi there! Best of luck with your 2500. You may want to check out my video on the FZ80 as well, (even though you didnt buy that model) because it goes into depth on some of the special features of the cameras (both have them the 2500 and 80) that you may be interested in. Thanks for the comment!
I got one and was always thinking if it was my not knowing about cameras enough to differentiate a good picture from average one. I thought it was me thinking the pictures of the 300 was very good. But you made it clear the 300 it’s a very good camera for daily use. Pictures are very sharp.
Definitely, I was surprised how sharp the FZ300 is for such a small camera. Thanks for the comment.
Thank you this was exactly the video i was looking for!
Correct, realistic, thorough and careful presentation to the chambers! Thank you very much!
Much appreciated comment! Thank you!
The CONTRAST DETECT AF is pretty poor compared to Canon, Nikon and Sony's PHASE DETECT AF.
These Point and shoot Superzooms do really well with MF-Manual Focus and changing the Aperture/F Stop value. Shutter speed is vital too. The stills are far better in MF than AF. I have the newer FZ1000II and the AF is pretty disappointing but the MF is superb. I can get sweet Macro pics, sweet close ups, very nice landscape photos and brilliant Portraits in MF.
I didnt know Paul McCartney made camera reviews. 😄
Let it be. Let it be!
@9:30 Those are the seeds from a sweetgum tree, aka "barefoot killers". 😂
Oh great ! Thanks I see the all over and never knew that I love that nickname lol
Great comparison!
Why do you think there is no fz3000? It's a pity, isnt it?
I have a fz1000 with some problems and i have been thinking on fz2000, but i dont know if it is too old in year 2024.
Whay do you think?
Exist one bridge camera capable of 4K 60fps?
Hi there. Thanks for the compliment! Yes it is a shame there is no FZ3000 but Panasonic just came out with a new superzoom the FZ80D so that gives us hope that maybe they will refresh the other lines! I don't think the FZ2000/2500 is too old because there aren't any similar models really besides the RX10IV, which is the only other 1" sensor high quality bridge camera. So just as long as you understand the plusses and minuses of the camera there is no reason why you can't successfully use it in 2024. Thanks for the comment!
The fruit in the tree at about 9:30 look a lot like rambutan. I used to eat them like peanuts!
As long as they’re not poisonous !
It would be great to see Phase Detect Auto Focus, if possible in a bridge camera. My only real complaint with the 2500 is the Focus. I often drop to manual just to make sure. Also use the HC-X1500 camcorder with the XLR audio/Light handle and external shotgun mic. The auto-focus and audio on the HC-X1500 are much better than the 2500, as well as the smooth zoom in/out.
Hi. How do you find the image quality of the Fz2500 and HC X1500 compares with each other? Which camera do you prefer? I have the x1500 also and was wondering if I should get the FZ2500 for the 1 inch sensor. Thankyou
@Doug-y2v The HC-X1500 has better video resolution and rates, but is newer. The IS and AutoFocus on the HC is better.
If in a well lit scene, the HC is fine. The FZ2500 is dated. I now have a G9M2 which is great for photo and video. It just lacks the XLR inputs, but I could buy yet another gadget. The G9M2 has MFT sensor and is real nice. I like the convenience of the 2500, but if I needed more low light video capability I might look at the G9M2 or even GH7 if you need the streaming. I did also get the 100-400 (200-800 35mm equivalent) lense for the G9M2. That is mainly for stills of wildlife.
Great video good content, these Panasonic bridge cameras are superb, very easy to take great videos and photos with minimal effort, I own the fz1000 original, thinking of upgrading to the 2500 for more video features 😁😂
nice! you'd get a longer zoom too. Thanks for the comment!
The FZ1000 MKII is not an older model, it came out in 2019.
Hi, you are right. If I mentioned it was older I stand corrected however it is a refresh of an older model.
I love your content, but I must say: don't know about the 2500, but the 300 has an HDR effect (aside from built-in HDR), which limits you somewhat because of the fixed ISO400, but provides great results for blown out skies. :)
Update: I just bought the FZ2000 because my FZ300 was ruinted by the warranty service here in Hungary (sad, huh?) and Panasonic ceased the model. Anyways, I can confirm the mode (Scene: HYDN) is available in the FZ2000 as well - helping me out with the blown-out skies.
Good to know ! Thanks for the input
Great comparison! I find the video when zoomed in on both of these to be unusable. There is a small micro jitter that gives me anxiety when watching. Ive noticed most bridge cameras with large telephoto lens do this. I dont know of any that have solid stabilisation like what I have on my G9ii. And the Panasonic vx-1 handicam has amazing stabilisation, I just wish they could have the same stabe in these other cameras. I would love to see a new version of the fz80 with rock solid stabe. I think the manufacturers think we dont care about bridge cameras any more or handy cams but I love them!
Hi there! Thanks for the comment. I would agree at the long end, the stabilization isn't perfect. I am actually working on a WXf1 (same as VX-1) video to test the stabilization as well.
@@techtoremember8096 cool man I look forward to watching it. The vx-1 is an amazing tool for capturing random moments, I’m not sure why they seemed to have stopped making handy cams. I had the hx1500 and compared it to the vx-1 and was surprised how good the vx-1 holds up to its bigger more expensive brother. If only the vx-1 could do 10bit vlog and higher frame rates it would be an amazing tool
I signed up. Thank you.
Hope to see low light vido
Iam torn between the larger sensor and the extra zoom with the smaller sensor. Is there a big difference?
Those are sweet gum tree seed balls.
Ah ok thanks, mystery solved!
I dont need 4k video, I like 1080p, so please, which one will give the best stabilized 1080 video ? It's an answer that I cant seem to find anywhere!
The stabilization on both cameras in 1080p is close, with the edge going to the FZ300. Its a bit easier stabilizing a smaller sensor so the 300 gets the edge but they are both good and very close.
@@techtoremember8096 Thanks Buddy, much appreciated indeed.
Great video!
The heavy 4K crop on the 2500 is definitely a deal breaker for me. I have both of these, and I’m keeping the 300.
Yes that crop really ruins the wide angle. Of course, you get more reach at telephoto but I agree, its discouraging. Hope you enjoy your 300 and thanks for the comment!
We want better bridges, I don't know why they do not simply use theese same bodies and introduce phone's sensors and processors on it... but I suspect that yes, as you said, they only want to sell expensive glasses and FF bodies, and the rest just go for the phones :( imagine something like a littya900 sensor with that fz2500 body and optics... just will destroy the micro43/APSC/FF market for consumer use
At the approx 2 min marker you said that the FZ2500 which was released in 2016 had an older version with the FZ1000 II... how so cause the FZ1000 II wasn't released until 2019 so how can it be older?
Just to clarify: The original FZ1000 was released in 2014. The updated version was released in 2019, yes.
Thanks
hello, i have a fz70, u have a review of this amazing camera?
Hi there I do not have a review of 70, however the 80 and 70 are very similar,. the big difference is the video resolution. The 80 can shoot in 4k/30 and the 70 is restricted to 1080p
fz300 or SX70hs?
I prefer the 300
370 / 5 000
Hi, you helped me a lot in choosing a camera, I was wondering between Sony RX10 Mark3 and Sony RX10 Mark4, I chose RX10 Mark3, great camera, but I miss a little tilting screen from the side down and I'm thinking about Lumix FZ2000..? I'm mainly interested in image quality and nice background cutout, unless you know another camera model with a good zoom. Greetings Przemek from Poland!
Well, they are both good cameras. Will give about the same amount of background blur. I do think the Sony has a better picture as you can see from my video but the Panasonic has more features. So its a personal decision! Both good cameras.. Hello from Poland and thanks for reaching out!
I tried to answer you 2x but youtube keep deleting it... I will buy a sony a57 for a good price, do you think it is a good camera? i`m starting in photography
Hi there the Sony a57 is a very old camera with A mount lenses that are no longer made It has very old technology and I think you can get a more modern camera for a similar price
@@techtoremember8096 thank you dude, u are legit! I love your videos, keep it up
I have had Canon sx510hs and then canon sx60hs - would it be a significal upgrade if I will move to Lumix fz300 now ?
I did a review of the SX70 which is the successor to the 60hs and I really like the FZ300 more than than the 70 which means I would like it even more than the 60! I think the FZ300 delivers better image quality, low light and stabilization but its only 1/2 the zoom range of the Canons. Most of the time, however, 600mm is more than enough unless you are doing serious birding etc.
Pls can you tell if there is any setting on the fz300 when connecting a zoom f1 with a shotgun mic ?
Or just plug and record ?
Thanks for your answer.
Hi no specific setting but should work just fine as it accepts external mic inputs
Wonder how these cams focus stands up to the RX100M7
The Sony has the Phase Detect more sophisticated AF so it will be unquestionably more reliable.
both are 8 and 9 year old cameras, are there newer (and better) alternatives?
The RX10IV is my favorite bridge camera in terms of image quality, features etc. but that is also older. Unfortunately it seems that the manufacturers have abandoned these kind of cameras and that is why they are on the older side ..they have not yet had any replacements! If you want something more modern , you'll have to go with a mirrorless camera and interchangeable lenses but there are many people who still prefer the all in one design and that is why they have a following.
Also the FZ300 doesn't have Focus Stacking, it does have Post Focus but this isn't the same so correcting you again.
Actually the video is correct as Post focus is a form of focus stacking-both accomplish the same result. One does it in camera, the other through software. Nice try. Oh maybe you should concentrate on correcting your grammar as your message has a run on sentence.
Time travel? The FZ300 is already 9 years old!
I guess an FZ500 is out of the question😢
Very nice comparisson!! I was looking for that, thanks a lot!!
My pleasure. Thanks for the comment!
In photo, most bridge cameras perform well, but when you go to video 4K, ALL suck, they are a world away, not even near of what any mft can give with a cheap lens (lets not tal about leica lenses), I've tried half a dozen of them, all returned to the sellers, when you later do a digital 2X zoom in FCPX, the deficiencies get hugely amplified. Shooting family videos?, OK, but do not go further than that...and I include the Sony Rx 10 IV. Half a century working in the field gives me a good perspective....
www.youtube.com/@CarloFerraro