Building the World's 1st Hypersonic Airplane | Hermeus

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 лип 2024
  • Later this year Hermeus is aiming to take their first subsonic flight with the goal of hitting Mach 2.5 next year. For Episode 43 of S³ we got an inside look at how they're building 1 plane a year to pull it off.
    Startup: www.hermeus.com/
    0:00 Flight
    0:43 Gotta go fast
    2:30 Building engines
    4:11 Turbojet & Ramjet
    7:04 1 Plane/Year
    10:40 Next: First Flight
    Blog ✍️
    saturdaystartups.beehiiv.com/
    Socials 📱
    / jasonjoyride 🐦 | / jasonjoyride 📸 | / jason-carman-63b384199 👨🏼‍💼 | www.jasoncarman.com/s3 💻

КОМЕНТАРІ • 537

  • @jackriminton7959
    @jackriminton7959 2 місяці тому +255

    Another super high quality video. No dumbing down, great editing, great storytelling

    • @marsrocket
      @marsrocket 2 місяці тому +15

      Are you kidding? They spent 12 minutes communicating about 2 minutes worth of information. And they started off by saying “people always ask why hypersonic?” And then never answer the question.

    • @jackriminton7959
      @jackriminton7959 2 місяці тому +5

      @@marsrocket maybe you need to find another channel my friend

    • @anthonyb5279
      @anthonyb5279 2 місяці тому

      Its all baffle them with bullshit. They are 100% full of shit.

    • @RubenMyburgh-gw2ww
      @RubenMyburgh-gw2ww 2 місяці тому

      Its not fake

    • @anthonyb5279
      @anthonyb5279 2 місяці тому +2

      @@RubenMyburgh-gw2ww Yes it is. Its a scam.

  • @dpsamu2000
    @dpsamu2000 2 місяці тому +101

    The SR71 was a turbo bypass ramjet. When it got to ramjet speed the turbine was bypassed. The secret sauce was to take the supersonic flow down to subsonic so it could mix with fuel. Supersonic flow is like a liquid flowing. It takes longer to mix with fuel. Gaseous subsonic air mixes faster.

    • @MyHWYBro
      @MyHWYBro 2 місяці тому +5

      Supersonic air is also extremely turbulent and inconsistent in flow rate. Having that steady, laminar flow of subsonic air is crucial for the engine's intake.

    • @robertcox14
      @robertcox14 2 місяці тому +1

      Yeah, I wondered if "time" for fuel to ignite and burn might be a borderline that you could only cross by having some kind of "super fast" burn. Hypersonic seems to get past that, using the "ram" of high speed air - does one part fuel "blow and go" in less time than the speed of normal ignition?

    • @Rookies103
      @Rookies103 2 місяці тому

      Darpa, skunk works don't care ​@@MyHWYBro

    • @dpsamu2000
      @dpsamu2000 2 місяці тому +1

      @@robertcox14 It's about time for fuel to mix with air. In the compressed supersonic ram air it's trying to mix liquids. In air compressed not to supersonic flow it's still gaseous, and mixes with aerosolized liquid fuel faster.

    • @Ra-wr2kf
      @Ra-wr2kf Місяць тому +2

      This screams you just watched a UA-cam video on it with no engineering background. Turbulent flow allows for better mixing and ramjets are more propulsively efficient than any other engine please do research

  • @BPSspace
    @BPSspace 2 місяці тому +223

    S3 On TOP 🔝🆙

    • @marcusrauch4223
      @marcusrauch4223 2 місяці тому +1

      Hi Joe

    • @ahmedalshalchi
      @ahmedalshalchi 2 місяці тому

      You are much more performance than those ... You are mostly an individual task force while those are a company with bigger budget ....

    • @JackOHaraEngineering
      @JackOHaraEngineering 2 місяці тому +2

      @@ahmedalshalchiBlud is waffling

    • @ahmedalshalchi
      @ahmedalshalchi 2 місяці тому

      @@JackOHaraEngineering Blud ?!... What do you mean ?

    • @TyphoonUSSR
      @TyphoonUSSR 2 місяці тому

      TOP: *Mig-31BM - 3400 km/h*

  • @banzaiib
    @banzaiib 2 місяці тому +62

    2:03 - the J58 begs to differ... and technically all modern, supersonic fighters harness, to some extent, the compression from shockwaves generated in the intake. Not to the "ram-jet" level where the compressor stages are fully bypassed, like the J58, but they do benefit from it. Good luck guys. Can't wait to see it haul butt!

    • @jeffk412
      @jeffk412 2 місяці тому +12

      Was gonna say something similar. A bit cocky, but I get that swagger comes with the territory. Maybe actually fly something first though...

    • @Rjjamess
      @Rjjamess 2 місяці тому

      Yea I was fine until he said what they were doing hasn't been done before haha
      Confusion level: visible

  • @QuixEnd
    @QuixEnd 2 місяці тому +141

    Who _IS_ this guy?! Getting the wildest interviews and docs ive seen in ages. So cool

  • @psychomachyy
    @psychomachyy 2 місяці тому +33

    Guy who has HERMEUS hoodie is so well spoken and for someone like me who's first language isn't English and haven't learnt at school im first place and listening him to explain all stuff made me happy. Wish you all the best guys , well done!

  • @kinfongyeung5400
    @kinfongyeung5400 2 місяці тому +92

    x15 is not a ramjet, its a rocket propelled. many ramjet equipped airplane/missile are rocket boosted instead of dropped by an aircraft since that make little sense (since as he said it, the craft need to get to ~ mach3 to start the engine). In fact SR71 has literally a turbo-ram jet design so I don't understand why he said no plane has done that before.

    • @s3_build
      @s3_build  2 місяці тому +33

      Yeaaaahhh I super messed up on the BRoll here... sorry guys :(

    • @prodabber0222
      @prodabber0222 2 місяці тому +11

      @@s3_build no problem we all make mistakes :)

    • @kinfongyeung5400
      @kinfongyeung5400 2 місяці тому +3

      @@s3_build don’t worry we all make mistakes. The important thing is to recognize the mistakes and learn from it.

    • @mrhassell
      @mrhassell 2 місяці тому +3

      Hence why its called the X-15 Hypersonic Rocket Plane.

    • @motorbikesnbeers
      @motorbikesnbeers 2 місяці тому +1

      @@s3_buildmeant to be high up in this company and you don’t know the difference between a rocket and a jet… hmmm

  • @orangeade3533
    @orangeade3533 2 місяці тому +60

    The SR-71 bridged the gap between supersonic and hypersonic decades ago. Definitely has been done before lol

    • @yaboikindabored9831
      @yaboikindabored9831 2 місяці тому +8

      Damn bro you're smarter than everyone on the video, how amazing!

    • @orangeade3533
      @orangeade3533 2 місяці тому +12

      @@yaboikindabored9831 it's nothing personal buddy 😂

    • @breadboi1248
      @breadboi1248 2 місяці тому +5

      hypersonic is mach 5+ buster

    • @rocksparadox
      @rocksparadox 2 місяці тому +8

      @@yaboikindabored9831
      'Damn bro you're smarter than everyone on the video, how amazing!''
      Dyckryding the makers of a video is far from original or beneficial to an honest discussion, oh sorry, used some big words there.

    • @yaboikindabored9831
      @yaboikindabored9831 2 місяці тому +1

      @@rocksparadox Who said I was glazing the makers (Also it's one guy that's that the maker)? I'm glazing the engineers and scientist there

  • @bensmith7536
    @bensmith7536 2 місяці тому +20

    Aviation needs much more like this.... the way it used to be.
    I wish them all the best.

  • @Roman-hx3qj
    @Roman-hx3qj 2 місяці тому +1

    Give it a whirl guys keep going. Glad to see young people push the edge of aviation technology forward!

  • @InfoSopher
    @InfoSopher 2 місяці тому

    Love it!
    Really brightened my day, thank you!

  • @SoloRenegade
    @SoloRenegade 2 місяці тому +28

    2:00 false
    SR-71, A-12, YF-12

    • @icgz711
      @icgz711 2 місяці тому +7

      Literally came here to comment the exact same thing lol… sr71 was doing this like 60 years ago

    • @volkerpaulwilhelm1482
      @volkerpaulwilhelm1482 Місяць тому

      🤓‼

    • @gregkirby9059
      @gregkirby9059 Місяць тому +1

      BRO this

    • @FloridaManMatty
      @FloridaManMatty 10 днів тому +1

      Not been done before??? Pratt and Whitney did it in the early 1960s 😂

  • @manjitpathak3041
    @manjitpathak3041 2 місяці тому +2

    man, these videos are a breath of fresh air.

  • @BrunoDeMarques
    @BrunoDeMarques 2 місяці тому +1

    Bless you guys and your investors for pushing forward one the most critical technologies in humanity’s history: transportation.
    I’ve just felt like leaving the following piece of information, for no particular reason: Do check the Concord’s development problem: if I remember correctly, there’s an issue with air coming through the intake at Mach speeds, with conventional turbines. It always needs to enter the turbine subsonic (even when flying at mach speeds). Once the ramjet kicks in, I suppose that’s no longer an issue and it’s even desirable.

  • @F1fan007
    @F1fan007 2 місяці тому +1

    So glad to see you are pushing the envelope. Like you said, aircraft progress has stagnated to almost nothing. Can’t wait to see exciting times ahead with hypersonic. We need major innovations and breakthroughs like we haven’t seen in years. Great video!!

  • @marvelthespacewing5562
    @marvelthespacewing5562 2 місяці тому

    LETS GOOO, I BEEN WAITING FOR THIS!!!

  • @WHURobKip
    @WHURobKip 2 місяці тому

    Very excited for this!! Good luck chaps

  • @r9337s
    @r9337s 2 місяці тому +1

    Looking forward to seeing your future success's!

  • @gaius_enceladus
    @gaius_enceladus 11 днів тому

    Great stuff! Gooooo Hermeus!
    I *can't wait* to see some Hermeus planes flying!

  • @rkolagatla
    @rkolagatla 2 місяці тому +1

    You people look confident and all the best.

  • @gabrielfernandez145
    @gabrielfernandez145 2 місяці тому +43

    Actually the fastest fighter jet in service is the MIG-31BM flying at mach 2.83

    • @stevehicks8944
      @stevehicks8944 2 місяці тому +7

      Yep, just before the wing leading edges start to melt and you destroy the engines. Meanwhile, the SR-71 has just flown at Mach 3.0 for the last several hours while its crew flips the MiG-31 the bird….

    • @antonallen8047
      @antonallen8047 2 місяці тому +7

      ​@@stevehicks8944um I think that's retired

    • @anormalphantom130
      @anormalphantom130 2 місяці тому +10

      @@antonallen8047 They've said the SR-71 has been retired like 37 times by now, and they still pull it back out to use it.

    • @breadboi1248
      @breadboi1248 2 місяці тому +4

      that's an interceptor🤓

    • @imGeistevereint
      @imGeistevereint 2 місяці тому +5

      @@breadboi1248 thats just a role for a fighter jet lmao

  • @basselm804
    @basselm804 2 місяці тому

    Great little documentary... massively well done.

  • @RogerWilco1
    @RogerWilco1 2 місяці тому +3

    The visuals you got in that factory are spectacular. It looks like it was lit by hollywood. Bravo. Guessing you are using a Sony A7 S3.

  • @MattWaller04
    @MattWaller04 2 місяці тому +1

    The enthusiasm is there for sure

  • @StillAliveAndKicking_
    @StillAliveAndKicking_ 2 місяці тому

    This is impressive, I look forward to successful flights. Looks like you’ve adopted the SpaceX incremental development approach alongside integration of as much manufacturing as you can to reduce overheads.

  • @thomastommygun8487
    @thomastommygun8487 2 місяці тому

    Excited to tune in to watch the Big Bang. Following can’t wait.

  • @fahdahmad7103
    @fahdahmad7103 2 місяці тому

    As an aerospace engineer based in the UK, it would truly be a dream come true to work at Hermeus!

  • @Eclipse-lw4vf
    @Eclipse-lw4vf 2 місяці тому +1

    Sounds pretty cool. Will be interesting Tj see

  • @schalkspies8189
    @schalkspies8189 2 місяці тому +1

    Top drawer, I'm along for the ride..😊

  • @deepaklenka5813
    @deepaklenka5813 2 місяці тому

    always love Jason with his deep tech videos.

  • @Humuku
    @Humuku 2 місяці тому

    Well done! Good luck with your channel.

  • @andersblom9152
    @andersblom9152 2 місяці тому

    Wish you all good luck! Hope to c you in the air soon!

  • @sciencehub5197
    @sciencehub5197 2 місяці тому

    Wow, this video was well edited!

  • @philipcarter8511
    @philipcarter8511 2 місяці тому

    Wow, these guys seem to have their shit together. Good luck to them!

  • @halcon2134
    @halcon2134 2 місяці тому +2

    Ooohhh!, the facilities are every man alive's dream. Have fun.

  • @ariadnelecoutre9453
    @ariadnelecoutre9453 2 місяці тому

    Nice Vid! Thanks!

  • @nathanielsims1215
    @nathanielsims1215 2 місяці тому

    Great video, I liked listening to the engineers

  • @alphahawkgames6896
    @alphahawkgames6896 2 місяці тому

    This is the type of engineering that we love!

  • @jangel3942
    @jangel3942 2 місяці тому +2

    Didn’t the SR-71 Blackbird also had like a two stage engine setup?

  • @richardurwin
    @richardurwin 2 місяці тому

    Awesome!

  • @TheAlfredoWay
    @TheAlfredoWay Місяць тому

    I love where this is going

  • @masterchafer
    @masterchafer 2 місяці тому +319

    Lots of startup jargon with a lot of talk and not much said

    • @stevefink6000
      @stevefink6000 2 місяці тому +44

      Larping hard. I wouldnt invest a dime in this one.

    • @Henrik.S8
      @Henrik.S8 2 місяці тому +11

      They're confident but let's see the damn thing fly first.

    • @kiwiadventures3773
      @kiwiadventures3773 2 місяці тому +12

      Im fairly sure that the aircraft skin shouldn’t have a aerodynamic transition as in 0:47

    • @Chooch8877
      @Chooch8877 2 місяці тому +2

      thanks lol

    • @Porter92
      @Porter92 2 місяці тому +6

      @@stevefink6000lol yall know anything or just making up shit?

  • @DanielSmith-lv5ed
    @DanielSmith-lv5ed Місяць тому

    These guys are dam good! Like dam good and especially to be in their 20's or 30's.

  • @camdoice
    @camdoice 2 місяці тому

    another banger

  • @dinger40
    @dinger40 2 місяці тому +10

    Fastest operational aircraft today is the MIG 31 not the F15 ( M2.8 v 2.5 ).The world does exist outside the USA.

    • @fteoOpty64
      @fteoOpty64 2 місяці тому

      So what does the MIG31 do for Vmax?? SR71 has done Mach 4.5 according to it's pilot. Going over NK with multiple missile lock on it. But none can catch it!.

    • @dinger40
      @dinger40 2 місяці тому +3

      @@fteoOpty64 SR71/YF12 is not operational now and hasn't been for years.

    • @_cyantist
      @_cyantist 2 місяці тому +2

      considering 3.3 is the operational limit of the SR-71 i highly highly doubt it did 4.5, that pilot is talking out his ass

    • @jonpetter8921
      @jonpetter8921 2 місяці тому

      The best aircraft engineer and innovators has been from Europe: People that build Concorde, A380 etc.....

    • @jonpetter8921
      @jonpetter8921 2 місяці тому

      @@dlmdee Russia, China even the US have been copying from Europe: UK, Germany France
      First jets, first supersonic jets, first space aircraft were european inventions.

  • @sebastianbenner977
    @sebastianbenner977 2 місяці тому +2

    How are they dealing with friction heating? The SR-71 used Titanium, but this looks like an aluminium skin.

  • @BiggestMarph
    @BiggestMarph 2 місяці тому

    0:09 what a profound way to look at aviation.

  • @nooahchannel
    @nooahchannel 2 місяці тому

    Amazing.

  • @FBAExapt
    @FBAExapt Місяць тому

    This is crazy!!!

  • @greenveg42
    @greenveg42 2 місяці тому

    Great stuff as always!!!
    I kinda get the feeling that the playback speed is like amped with 10%?

  • @1320crusier
    @1320crusier 2 місяці тому +2

    When thermal cycling 3D prints of some alloys, do they become stronger the more cycles you put on them?

    • @jmchaser
      @jmchaser 2 місяці тому +1

      Actually an excellent question and one I’d like to know the answer to as well.

  • @FBAExapt
    @FBAExapt Місяць тому

    that’s so crazy

  • @chickenp7038
    @chickenp7038 2 місяці тому +6

    this is the best chanel on youtube rn. it’s insane

  • @mchristr
    @mchristr 2 місяці тому

    If water-boarded and forced to choose between "bespoke" and "discreet" I'd reluctantly adopt the latter. Both are excruciatingly cliche but we don't seem to have an alternative.

  • @bailahie4235
    @bailahie4235 2 місяці тому +1

    Perhaps somewhere mentioned already, but wasn't Concord the first? Looked it up: no Concord was ("just") MACH 2, hypersonic is at least MACH 5 (5 times speed of sound).

  • @goodson77784
    @goodson77784 2 місяці тому +12

    how smart are these guys if they have a black ceiling in a technical work setting. real genius.

    • @diegosuarez92
      @diegosuarez92 2 місяці тому

      Why is a black ceiling good?

    • @RogerWilco1
      @RogerWilco1 2 місяці тому +8

      @@diegosuarez92 I think he is saying it is bad, but gives no reason. White ceiling is when you want to blast everywhere with light cheaply. I think they want precise lighting in different areas.

    • @diegosuarez92
      @diegosuarez92 2 місяці тому +1

      @@RogerWilco1 hmm yea that could be. It didn’t sound like the comment was talking about filming or lighting, but then I can’t read minds 😄
      The choice between black or white ceilings in a technical work setting depends on factors such as light reflection, perceived spaciousness, aesthetics, and maintenance. White ceilings offer brightness and a neutral backdrop, while black ceilings provide focus and a modern, high-tech appearance. Consider the specific goals and design scheme of the workspace when making the decision.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
      Anyway, I don’t really care about filming and lighting. Was more interest in the “technical work setting” part of it

    • @mariomaro7
      @mariomaro7 2 місяці тому +1

      Care to explain why a black ceiling in a technical setting is not good?

    • @daviddickinson6346
      @daviddickinson6346 2 місяці тому

      Why the hell does that matter, go paint it for them if you don't like it. Jerk

  • @NewtonInDaHouseYo
    @NewtonInDaHouseYo 2 місяці тому

    That is an amazing venture. Question: What is the reason Quarterhorse doesn’t feature area ruling for it’s fuselage? Doesn’t that limit the top speed?

  • @SLBBP
    @SLBBP 2 місяці тому +3

    Engines are one thing but how are you going to deal with the heat and expansion of the plane itself while traveling at those speeds?

  • @Mr_Lukasgrim
    @Mr_Lukasgrim 2 місяці тому +4

    Isnt fastest operational aircraft the MiG-31?

  • @ToviDing
    @ToviDing 2 місяці тому

    I felt like the old SpaceX vibe is back!

  • @Hughe_Jaynis69
    @Hughe_Jaynis69 2 місяці тому

    A folding wing design could help with any low speed maneuverability issues.

  • @thatbee4923
    @thatbee4923 2 місяці тому

    The engines they're making are straight out of ksp it's insane

  • @crebbsjd
    @crebbsjd 2 місяці тому

    So cool, the future is here!! America 🇺🇸 has to lead the way. Now or never. Really cool what you all are doing. Keep those specs in house and get the government contract. Our country has been waiting for a company like you. Good job!

  • @darylfortney8081
    @darylfortney8081 2 місяці тому +1

    This is so cool... I'm in Atlanta, can I visit the factory?

  • @DanielSmith-lv5ed
    @DanielSmith-lv5ed Місяць тому

    I know nothing of flying, but i know frozen magnets are much much stronger, and flipping the second mag would cause the gears to stabilize but with loss whereas flipping it other way, that is different, no stabilize, opposing fields. Just gotta try it

  • @user-ic6xf
    @user-ic6xf 2 місяці тому

    Yo, how does this channel have only 29.7K subscribers? Here before 1 million...

  • @Dumbo_Bat
    @Dumbo_Bat 2 місяці тому

    I never knew hypersonic aircraft weren’t even a thing back then! I thought there had been at least one in existence

  • @robertgolden1080
    @robertgolden1080 2 місяці тому

    SR-71. My tech is so old that it’s new again. However good luck guys. American aviation innovation, other than stealth tech and avionics, has been severely lacking in the past decades. It fantastic to see a younger generation getting excited about aviation and pushing new boundaries.

  • @evilelf5967
    @evilelf5967 2 місяці тому

    Something tells me we need to keep a close eye on these guys,they definately have the resources and engineering backgrounds,half the time it's a lack of proper fabrication and computational/manufacturing facilities,these guys have all of that,just straight up think it, make it, try it,reminds me of space-x and their philosophies,build, test, iterate.very interesting to say the least,can't wait for the first full on flight test.

  • @michaelwalsh7846
    @michaelwalsh7846 Місяць тому +1

    Aircraft. After the SR71 came the Hypersonic (Mach 5 +) Aurora. Staging at Machrihanish over 30yrs ago. I know it was seen a few times at said field longest in Europe at the time, able to take the shuttle if needed Before it showed on scope the mil operators would be briefed. Where is it now?

  • @theriwen7863
    @theriwen7863 2 місяці тому

    It looks fucking amazing, hope your first flight goes well. Make supersonic available to everyone again.

    • @theriwen7863
      @theriwen7863 2 місяці тому

      Video was so good, didnt notice that this isnt hermeus own channel, great doc, nice pacing.

  • @ALSNewsNow
    @ALSNewsNow 2 місяці тому +2

    The first "UNCLASSIFIED" hypersonic plane.

  • @ChainsawFPV
    @ChainsawFPV 2 місяці тому

    Will you be building manned craft, or staying with UAV's?

  • @offthepathworks9171
    @offthepathworks9171 2 місяці тому

    The first thing that comes to my mind when viewing your videos is - calculus man, that shit slaps.

  • @m14srv
    @m14srv 2 місяці тому

    I have a few questions 😂 quarterhorse why are the rivets proud of the planes skin ? Shouldn't they be smooth ? 🤔 is the turbine section like a high bypass jet giving clean flow to the ram jet?

  • @michaelcaroselli8940
    @michaelcaroselli8940 2 місяці тому +11

    “1st hypersonic airplane” okay I guess we’re going to pretend the X-15 never existed.

    • @jmchaser
      @jmchaser 2 місяці тому +2

      X-15 wasn’t an airplane, it was a manned *rocket*. Conventional turbofan engines cannot go that fast.

    • @superblackbirdrider
      @superblackbirdrider 2 місяці тому +1

      X-15 was rocket powered 😊

    • @ghostdog2365
      @ghostdog2365 2 місяці тому

      @@jmchaserRocket powered or not, it was an airplane because of its flight trajectory and mission profile. The X-15 was certainly an airplane, along with the X-43, (arguably) the Space shuttle, and other space transport systems that utilize aerodynamic surfaces to glide through the air and land on a tarmac.

    • @DukeOfParis
      @DukeOfParis Місяць тому

      @@superblackbirdriderits an airplane. Space shuttle also is classified as an airplane does matter what engine or how it's powered

    • @superblackbirdrider
      @superblackbirdrider Місяць тому

      @SharonCothren the whole point of the video is that it is jet engined, not rocket powered. It's the first (or will be) jet engined hypersonic airplane.

  • @averystablegenius
    @averystablegenius Місяць тому +1

    What is the experience of passengers when this thing tries to maneuver? How long does it take to slow down enough, not throwing passengers into the shoulder harnesses, to not kill everyone on board when it banks left or right, climbs or descends? How much of the flight regime then is actually hypersonic on the way to a military airport required to land it?

  • @chrislatour758
    @chrislatour758 2 місяці тому +2

    No pilot, no airplane pal. U just built a fast UAV

  • @NICKCIN
    @NICKCIN 2 місяці тому +1

    hell yeah! Can't wait to see super/hypersonic stuff back in action after so long!

  • @Inazuma68
    @Inazuma68 2 місяці тому

    But the SR-71 hat a turbo ram as well or did it? Also the big jet in the animation looks similar to the XB70

  • @xmorse
    @xmorse 2 місяці тому +3

    I would like to hear the questions too not only answers to unknown open questions

  • @kzar42
    @kzar42 14 днів тому

    X-15, first flight on the 8th of June, 1959. The first and fastest manned hypersonic plane ever to fly at Mach 6.72. X-43, 2004. Fastest unmanned aircraft ever to fly at Mach 9.6. There can only be one First.

  • @tiedeken1
    @tiedeken1 2 місяці тому

    super rad

  • @slaction
    @slaction 2 місяці тому +11

    I bet the amount of cocaine that goes through that facility on a weekly basis is astounding.

    • @Bangpath247
      @Bangpath247 2 місяці тому +1

      they just radiate those Silicon Valley 10X Synergy!! WAYTOMUCHAMPHETAMINES!1!! vibes dont they?

    • @d9k1
      @d9k1 Місяць тому

      @@Bangpath247this is the biggest scam contractor bs. These guys quit their jobs to fool the government into funding a facade of a project. Nothing said in this entire video, and everything is just props lmao.

  • @patrickfitzpatrick1600
    @patrickfitzpatrick1600 2 місяці тому

    Are you using imperial or SI units of your calculations?

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 2 місяці тому

    Realy I like this powerful hypersonic airplane

  • @ianmastin
    @ianmastin 2 місяці тому

    I wish them success.

  • @nurnberg1561
    @nurnberg1561 2 місяці тому

    This craft in the background is essentially a jet powerd hypersonic missile drone

  • @aigslmnop6559
    @aigslmnop6559 2 місяці тому

    Chimera is a mix of two engines this saves weight but constrains both I wonder if anyone looks at alternating the two integrated engines

  • @tonykasunic1
    @tonykasunic1 2 місяці тому +2

    It would be amazing for them to explain how their engine is different from the Pratt & Whitney J58 on the SR71. Sounds similar but im not an engineer, so i must be missing something.

    • @cayleependerass
      @cayleependerass 2 місяці тому

      I honestly don't think you missed anything. Sounds like a startup saying all the startup words.

    • @norsenomad
      @norsenomad 2 місяці тому

      I was wondering the same... From what I've read, they are both examples of turbine-based combined cycle (TBCC) propulsion, in principle. To my (limited) knowledge about engines, they look quite similar. Some difference: while the J58 engine uses 6 bypass tubes to move air from the 4th compressor stage directly to the afterburner, in the Chimera engine "air bypasses the turbojet" (quoting Hermeus) entirely and is led directly to the afterburner. I can only assume the explanations are accurate. A second difference is that Hermeus base their solution on a commercially available engine, which saves cost - and that's a big deal, for economy and scale of manufacture. It will be very interesting to see how the modification of the Pratt & Whitney F100 (which powers the F-15 and F-16) into a TBCC will work out. Any way, wishing good luck and cheering for Hermeus! J58 bypass explained (at point in video): ua-cam.com/video/F3ao5SCedIk/v-deo.html Chimera bypass explained (at point in video): ua-cam.com/video/-dykzl9Kaf4/v-deo.html

  • @dpsamu2000
    @dpsamu2000 2 місяці тому

    I think the bond we feel for airplanes is because they are so strongly governed by the primal physics of life. Like the structure of birds, and even fish are governed by the primal physics of flow. We sense that primal kinship of the form of airplanes following the primal physics of the life from which we evolved. As our ancestors evolved successfully by recognizing, and developing attraction for others that adhered to primal physics.

  • @kish2934
    @kish2934 2 місяці тому +2

    Incredible startup and production

  • @retirementplanner
    @retirementplanner 2 місяці тому

    Epic 🇺🇸
    It's time to build!
    American Techno-Optimism!!!

  • @RollinsBrown
    @RollinsBrown 2 місяці тому

    Check out Hornady’s new DVRT technology. Wonder if it’s somewhat applicable?

  • @ItzGanked
    @ItzGanked 2 місяці тому

    gotta go fast

  • @user-wy5ch2xc8z
    @user-wy5ch2xc8z 2 місяці тому +2

    btw if you guys didn't realise, this was an marketing campaign aka sponsored video.. not an interview.

  • @i_might_be_lying
    @i_might_be_lying 2 місяці тому +1

    Noice!

    • @ALeAnn365
      @ALeAnn365 2 місяці тому

      I second that noice!

  • @ALeAnn365
    @ALeAnn365 2 місяці тому +1

    Can there be a possibility of strapping one of these engines to a smart for two car? 🤔

  • @mattfgln
    @mattfgln 2 місяці тому

    I missed the first flight date? When will it be?

  • @tomcatr2966
    @tomcatr2966 2 місяці тому

    You will need to apply an insulating coating to your aircraft. Like Shuttle or Buran. (black tiles) Otherwise your plane will melt.