Talisker Storm Single Malt Scotch Whisky

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 сер 2024
  • In this video Erik Wait reviews the Talisker Storm Single Malt Scotch Whisky.
    Erik Wait Whisky Studies Facebook Group: / 1833110080244686
    THIS VIDEO IS INTENDED ONLY FOR VIEWERS WHO ARE OF LEGAL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE DRINKING AGE IN THEIR COUNTRY.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 15

  • @ErikWaitWhiskyStudies
    @ErikWaitWhiskyStudies  Рік тому

    Check out my review of the Talisker 18 Year Old Single Malt Scotch Whisky: ua-cam.com/video/8mQmJxm1dHc/v-deo.html&t

  • @hamo4558
    @hamo4558 Рік тому +3

    I enjoy the Storm, but i've also learnt that they can be considerable batch variations between bottlings, especially the more recent labellings, and more-so than any other Scotch that I have.

  • @AlexDraut
    @AlexDraut Рік тому +2

    Completely agree on this one. It's good, but around me, the 10 is the same price and same abv, and blows it away. I've had friends who prefer this over the 10 though.

  • @richk6877
    @richk6877 Рік тому +3

    I had a bottle of the Storm with the blue label and I enjoyed it a lot. Didn't notice the aftertaste you referred to, and if it was a saccharin/aspartame aftertaste then I'm pretty sure I would have noticed. I will definitely be sure to taste before I pick up another bottle.

  • @dirtydawg3734
    @dirtydawg3734 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for the honesty

  • @teddyballgame25
    @teddyballgame25 Рік тому +1

    Appreciate the review. W the 10 going up and up in price I was considering trying this out, but I’m tapped on young, peated whisky.

  • @marcwhiskey
    @marcwhiskey Рік тому +3

    I agree with the point about age statements however pricing plays a big role on those sweet characters and the lack of enough cask influence. Something like this is priced appropriate for a NAS in my opinion. I think I got my bottle under 50 bucks like 2 or 3 years ago. If they tried to play this off as a premium NAS then it would definitely be much more offensive. I don't reach for it often for some of the reasons you hit on in your tasting notes. I have the older blue label too.

  • @matthewmorin7016
    @matthewmorin7016 Рік тому +3

    I find the storm more to my liking than the 10. I find the storm had more punch of the salt brine that I like.

  • @MarcelB74
    @MarcelB74 Рік тому +6

    I don’t like the marketing from Talisker, this ‘made by the sea’ stuff
    The malt from Talisker comes from scotland and is malted at glen ord maltings in scotland, no sea in the neighborhood, from there the malt is being transported to Talisker on skye island. There the malt will be milled, mashed, fermented and distilled, after maybe 1 week the new make spirit will be transported to blackgrange, there the spirit will be put in the casks and after maturation it will be chill filtered and coloured with E150 as diageo does with almost all of their whisky’s
    So, if you want to be misleaded, then buy Talisker, personally i avoid Talisker and almost all diageo stuff, the casks are not great and it is all too mass produced…
    If you want an integrity island malt, then try ledaig 10 or 18.. it is unchillfiltered and natural colour at 46% as it should be..

  • @jackthepickledhound
    @jackthepickledhound Рік тому +1

    My first Storm was very similar to the 10. I wasn't very experienced with peat at that point. But I think they both showed good Talisker-esqu.
    NAS is depressing. Whisky is a product that offers no recourse for the consumer if they don't like it.
    The marketing department can say whatever they want to encourage you to buy this over that and after the purchase you done.

  • @SlavaWarface
    @SlavaWarface Рік тому +1

    Я только Talisker sky пробовал, неплохой дымный 👍🔥🇷🇺

  • @joesgoodlife
    @joesgoodlife Рік тому +1

    I have the older edition I paid $34 for it. I definitely did not get that flavor at all