yeah the guy they interviewed is good but this channel is b grade af, messy setup, bad lighting, colour grading issues especially with the b roll. No love put into this at all, pump and dump effort.
@@holobolo1661 not what pump and dump means at all - you are literally on the internet, look it up. This is a fascinating interview with a dedicated public servant, and all you numpties make note of is the questionable stylistic decisions of the set and the quality of a 70 year old man's dry cleaner..?
@@RadagastTheBrwn It's called an analogy pal, "look it up, you're literally on the internet". Also look up "literally" while you're at it. We are not literally on the internet, we are browsing/accessing the internet. You clearly know very little about video production or interviewing techniques, nor much else apparently as you didn't even read the comment you replied to correctly. Just another moron with more mouth than brains, Dunning-Kruger in full effect. You are the target market of quantity over quality media like this.
@@RadagastTheBrwnhere’s a fact for you. People who work in intelligence are not public servants nor are they civil servants. They’re actually servants of the crown and work for the King. Same with Police too, it’s only civil servants who are public servants.
Old school tie is still the most important aspect. Two examples: my former father-in-law had a lot of pressure put on him to join MI5 when he was a student at Oxford, despite the fact that he was a useless posh drunk. And a friend of mine who attended Eton school was recruited solely for that reason, and only afterwards were his MI5 handlers flabbergasted to learn that he could speak fluent Russian.
That was true in the past and both a strength and weakness (Philby etc), but no longer true. For example when I was a civil servant I had to undergo a day long security interview before I was allowed to work in a ministers office. The guy who interviewed me wasn't a posh boy from Oxbridge, but a charming fellow from the Irish Republic.
@@stevebarlow3154 Fair enough there, Ted. Although whatever the accents of the powers that be, I'm still not sure that they're all that reliable. For example, how was it possible for the UK security services NOT to foresee and prevent the recent racist riots? The people involved were hardly dastardly masters of disguise. Unless of course, it suited them for the riots to happen. That's possible, but on the road to conspiracist madness.
Fascinating interview but hard to follow. The answer starts before I even get a chance to read the question and I can’t have subtitles on cause it gets obstructed.
The 'situational awareness test' is very difficult. Add to that all the other parts of the initial application process and the background checks along the way. One isn't allowed to tell anyone about your application. One isn't told how you've done on each part of the tests, only 'you're on to the next part' or 'you've not been successful'. There are English, maths and reasoning tests, all to be done in a time sensitive manner. One also has the video questionaire phase, observational skills and a mixture of other tests. If you get through all that, you're invited to Thames House or MI6's HQ for interviews and further group test scenarios. Even if you pass all that and are invited to become an IO, you're under probation and part of a small team within a department. There are a plethora of roles within 5 and 6, from data analysis, auditors, electronics, security, language experts, carpentry, right to field operatives. Expect much paperwork and little in the way of car chases.
You do need several people to act as referees for you and obviously they have to know who you are applying to join. I think your wife/husband is allowed to be told, but they have to keep it secret.
One is only allowed one trusted person whom 5/6 may contact during the applications stages, to verify one's character/non drug usage/ personal details are correct (i.e. actually British etc) That person could be a long term partner, personal doctor etc. but even so, they aren't told who is contacting them, nor for what purpose. The applicant cannot tell anyone else about their application, ongoing stages or if/when one is given a role within the organisation. After becoming an IO, in any role, one is not allowed to discuss any manner of one's work, from colleagues to actual operations. The OSA should be adhered to at all times, even after leaving the service.
You asked the question wrong: You needed to ask instead, "What's the operation you ran that was closest to a James Bond movie?" That's worth another video.
I passed the online selection but hadn't attended uni so couldn't progress the application . Would have thought a yorkshire man with a local ( common) accent and 9 year's service behind me and running a landscaping business at the time would have been perfect to blend in to local communities and infiltrate - But nope , needed to have a degree at the time .
And the irony over the years that the "blue blood University" recruitment has turned out to have bought in some of the most well known public school traitors, as well some less known who have been "compromised" by the other side with honey traps etc.......
That was at least partly true, but personal qualities are what counts now. A lot of the staff at MI5 are female now, which wasn't the case in the past.
@@TesterAnimal1 BBC: "A man has described how he fought off the London Bridge knifeman with a narwhal tusk before pinning him to the ground to help end the attack. Darryn Frost, 38, was seen in pictures confronting Usman Khan, 28, who was armed with two knives." I also know of Hezbollah agents in London. Not that MI5/6 want to know, but whatever.
it's dumb to have very set very strict criteria on the "type" of history and characteristics a person should have, to be working on problem solving.. it's been proven that it is really good to get people from OUTWITH s field to look at problems as they think outside the box, and can see, or do, things that people within the field can't see/think like/do.. and people change through time.. People who were punks 20 years ago can be conservative now.. i bet loads of people who could be Great in those roles get rejected when really they'd be great assets to a company
We know. They roll through disaster after disaster and only secrecy protects them from the consequences of their extreme incompetence. Right through the Cold War the KGB headed up MI5 counter-intelligence section, for example (source: Peter Wright).
They don’t have a strict criteria on the type of person some should be. Only a base couple of things that most people in the industry have. There are people with all sorts of specialties and skills in intelligence agencies.
@@alannorthdevonuk763 The issue is, they've got blackmail material on recruits (because of this, none of them can go into politics "oh you like flight attendants tied up don't you") while the recruits have no blackmail material on THEM. That means the recruit's life is a daily reality of coercion and threat at the hands of their employer. Imagine you're in a DV interview. Guy's asking you questions and you're expected to answer them truthfully. You can't expect the same from him! So only a complete idiot or an academic would be suckered into this as a career. Result: recruit leaves after 5 years with real experience and knowledge of all sorts of things, with a fake CV about his history at an investment bank (while he knows nothing about investment banking but knows Arabic/Persian, uselessly).
Is this John Cleese from Monty Python ? His edge from his shirt is going upwards. Maybe a secret signal ? What does it mean ? 😂 Is it about shirt integrity ? Give me an appointment. So funny 😂😊
good video. discussion. mr. bickford negates to say: all russia wanted, and was agreed was NO ukraine in NATO. what nation would allow a border country with a shared 1,299mile border to be in NATO? the day after entrance and the agreement. NATO and US could put every and all offensive element a mile from the russian border. what leader of nation would accept that? IF china has a military pack and was "buying" mexico to be in it would the US accept 100s of chinese tactical missiles 5miles from el paso texas. not a chance. tanks would role into mexico, if needed to stop it. russia does that and putin is now: evil and the new "hitler". sorry the british gentleman is not correct with that.
Btw, white men can't apply anymore. It literally says when you apply, that applications from from white males will not be processed. They are ONLY recruiting ethnic minorities.
Most of what Mr Bickford goes on about is internal security and counter-intelligence work. Either he was the legal director of MI5 for much longer than for MI6 or what MI6's does has a higher security clearance level and he cannot talk about it.
@@CaboloNero simply not true, myths like these keep good people out of important jobs. Stop writing what you believe to be true, as if it was a fact you could prove with certainty.
@@CaboloNero100% not true. Most people that work in these agencies (especially the actual operators) are mostly from the military (SAS/SBS) who definitely wouldn’t of done Oxbridge.
This is the only place I find this information. For one moment, I thank you for providing. I'm looking for a British male or female pen pal through you tube that knows about the SAS involvement in the U.S. right now. I can't say much more.
tbh ............i can hardly stand the long history of war all round the world Britain has been given for centuries............... for the terrible state of our cuntrees now ................
With due respect sir, I would like to drag your attention to the fact that NATO is the reason behind this war, Russia’s request to join NATO was declined everyone knows under who’s constant pressure, Russia is using Ukraine as a buffer state between NATO & Russia, the way China did with Tibet for India, speaking of China the west is failing to understand the fact that China is an economical supporter of this war so I think west should focus on supporters than on leader.
I wonder how the old hypocrite justified subcontracting the torture of suspects to less squeamish intelligence services. The famous quote: "Put plenty of sugar in your tea, you'll need it where you're going..."
I rather work for CIgay then the traveling suits mib. CIA got drugs I will work in evidence locker. Or just pay me in drugs. I will take few steps down just to do drugs . Have to dumb it down somehow.
It was about a metre tall (although I do not carry measuring tape). This creature was within 1.5 metres of me. It was close. It had a bipedal, Velociraptor/ T-Rex like body (it was on two legs, it was not hopping like a kangaroo, it had two arms and appeared to be holding something in its hands) it had a human shaped and sized head. The entire face of this head, and the only noticeable features on this head were these two large black oval eyes covering the entire face. An analogy- imagine a human head, but the eye sockets extend from the forehead line to the line of the jaw bone covering the entire face with these two large black eyes. I did not see, and could not make out a mouth, a nose, ears, or hair. It had a tail. When its head first popped out its body was more upright, as it increased jogging speed it leant forward). It appeared to use the tail for balance. It did not break eye contact. This creature snuck up on me and stared me down. This entire scene had lasted only for around 5 seconds. This strange being of fauna/ creature/ I have no idea what it was (a crazy person fucking knows what it was (people are super smart). 3 years, 8 months ago. It did not have noticeable scales, feathers, or hair. It appeared to have black skin. The only colour of this creature was black. Although it was seen at night, and I do not have the ability to make out colours, it did appear to be the one black colour. Even the eyes were black. Vibes/my feelings Described by words and phrases. Intelligent (looked and acted like a nerdy human) smarter than me, it did sneak up on me. 2. Tourist vibes- this creature was keen, and interested. It behaved like a scientific academic of aJapanese tourist
Can you lie detect mental illness? What if they pass? A mentally ill person doesn't want answers, they have the answers. Like Christians, and Atheists.
Well, MI6 will not contact you in the case of an extraterrestrial or supernatural threat any more than would in the case of the Russian or Iranian threat, because their personal sense of secrecy and exclusivity is more important than the needs of this country or even of the entire world. The most important thing is that they don't contact you for more information about this strange "entity" because then you would know who they are, and that would be terrible! Better let our enemies win than compromise Mr Bond's mystique.
Just a question... why is Britain not catching and imprisoning the terrorists in the country at the moment??? I am sure MI 5/6 must have information on these illegal immigrants in your country??? Looking at the dynamics in Britain, they are running rampant around you???🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦
Well, the burden of proof lies with the state, so if the state cannot gather sufficient proof of terrorism of a subject it would not make sense to charge said subject with terrorism, because without sufficient evidence they would never get convicted of the crime. -Maybe this shows that most of the people who tend to be called terrorists, are not guilty of terrorism, but possibly something else or maybe nothing?!) Most people and of course me as well, still want to have due process in the court system, because if not the country would go bananas, anyone would be able to not only get charged, but also convicted of literally any crime or all crimes at any given time! That would be a much worse and worrying place to live in, would it not?! I certainly prefer this imperfect system or the status quo as you could call it, yet it is very important to keep asking questions of how to improve it If anyone is reading this and/or are unsure about the legal definition of terrorism, it can be summarized into: "A politically/ideological/religious, motivated crime of serious character, to spread fear and/or terror to the general public, with the intent to change and/or disturb the current status quo of the system in place". The full legal definition is longer and much more precise, look it up if needed.
He was not the former Director of MI5 and MI6. MI5 (properly known as The Security Service) and MI6 (more correctly known as The Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), are two separate departments of Government. Each has its own Head - the head of the Security Service is named The Director General. The head of SIS is known as the Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service. The gentleman in the video is neither. He introduced himself as the Head of Legal Services for both the Security Service and the SIS. The presenters of such videos need to take a little more care in describing the contents.
I'm guessing a bit here, but MI6 is above the salt. Mi5 below the salt. Being an ex Sandhurst officer (for 6) or ex cop or soldier (for 5) helps a great deal, esp for 5, where there's a big crossover with the cops anyway and you are trained already etc. Being a talented linguist will also help a great deal. So if you have a skill they want, that’s going to get you a long way.
I wish the questions were read out loud so I can listen to this without having to look at the screen.
It spoils the whole interview
UK - REFERENDUM ON MASS IMMIGRATION
@@mogadon7 Russia out of Ukraine and Syria.
The game is called - guess the question
You could have straightened his shirt lapel before filming !
yeah the guy they interviewed is good but this channel is b grade af, messy setup, bad lighting, colour grading issues especially with the b roll. No love put into this at all, pump and dump effort.
@@holobolo1661 not what pump and dump means at all - you are literally on the internet, look it up. This is a fascinating interview with a dedicated public servant, and all you numpties make note of is the questionable stylistic decisions of the set and the quality of a 70 year old man's dry cleaner..?
@@RadagastTheBrwn It's called an analogy pal, "look it up, you're literally on the internet".
Also look up "literally" while you're at it. We are not literally on the internet, we are browsing/accessing the internet.
You clearly know very little about video production or interviewing techniques, nor much else apparently as you didn't even read the comment you replied to correctly. Just another moron with more mouth than brains, Dunning-Kruger in full effect. You are the target market of quantity over quality media like this.
@@RadagastTheBrwnhere’s a fact for you. People who work in intelligence are not public servants nor are they civil servants. They’re actually servants of the crown and work for the King. Same with Police too, it’s only civil servants who are public servants.
Cinéma vérité...lol...
Old school tie is still the most important aspect. Two examples: my former father-in-law had a lot of pressure put on him to join MI5 when he was a student at Oxford, despite the fact that he was a useless posh drunk. And a friend of mine who attended Eton school was recruited solely for that reason, and only afterwards were his MI5 handlers flabbergasted to learn that he could speak fluent Russian.
That was true in the past and both a strength and weakness (Philby etc), but no longer true. For example when I was a civil servant I had to undergo a day long security interview before I was allowed to work in a ministers office. The guy who interviewed me wasn't a posh boy from Oxbridge, but a charming fellow from the Irish Republic.
@@stevebarlow3154 Fair enough there, Ted. Although whatever the accents of the powers that be, I'm still not sure that they're all that reliable. For example, how was it possible for the UK security services NOT to foresee and prevent the recent racist riots? The people involved were hardly dastardly masters of disguise. Unless of course, it suited them for the riots to happen. That's possible, but on the road to conspiracist madness.
@@stevebarlow3154yep much changed now. Got squaddies in 😅
Fascinating interview but hard to follow. The answer starts before I even get a chance to read the question and I can’t have subtitles on cause it gets obstructed.
The 'situational awareness test' is very difficult. Add to that all the other parts of the initial application process and the background checks along the way. One isn't allowed to tell anyone about your application. One isn't told how you've done on each part of the tests, only 'you're on to the next part' or 'you've not been successful'. There are English, maths and reasoning tests, all to be done in a time sensitive manner. One also has the video questionaire phase, observational skills and a mixture of other tests. If you get through all that, you're invited to Thames House or MI6's HQ for interviews and further group test scenarios. Even if you pass all that and are invited to become an IO, you're under probation and part of a small team within a department. There are a plethora of roles within 5 and 6, from data analysis, auditors, electronics, security, language experts, carpentry, right to field operatives. Expect much paperwork and little in the way of car chases.
You do need several people to act as referees for you and obviously they have to know who you are applying to join. I think your wife/husband is allowed to be told, but they have to keep it secret.
"one".....lolol.
One is only allowed one trusted person whom 5/6 may contact during the applications stages, to verify one's character/non drug usage/ personal details are correct (i.e. actually British etc) That person could be a long term partner, personal doctor etc. but even so, they aren't told who is contacting them, nor for what purpose. The applicant cannot tell anyone else about their application, ongoing stages or if/when one is given a role within the organisation. After becoming an IO, in any role, one is not allowed to discuss any manner of one's work, from colleagues to actual operations. The OSA should be adhered to at all times, even after leaving the service.
@@TheOfficialMinistryOfTruth "one"....lololol
Bugger all that then … best picking a jail bird. Or a junkie. I’ve met a real spy and he was a lying manipulative nasty man!😮
He’s clearly still at it!!
You may retire, but you never leave the intelligence services.
@@johnwright9372 I’m getting frightened now as you tell me this having watched the near senile gentleman struggle his way through a short chat…
@@DaveSCameronhe’s not struggling he’s just choosing his words wisely
IDk man ....
He didnt mention how the mythical "far right" are the "biggest threat to the UK"....so probably not.
You asked the question wrong: You needed to ask instead, "What's the operation you ran that was closest to a James Bond movie?" That's worth another video.
"Terrorists weren't being prosecuted". I can believe THAT bit. Nothing has changed.
For legal reasons, nothing to do with their religion.
Fixes his mic but not his collar….for fucks sake what about when they framed the podium?
It seemingly cuts out important bits like "will the UK experience another war"
Because the answer is obvious. Of course we will and we need him to tell us.
Told us nothing new!
Jackson Lamb’s proper older brother. 😂
I passed the online selection but hadn't attended uni so couldn't progress the application .
Would have thought a yorkshire man with a local ( common) accent and 9 year's service behind me and running a landscaping business at the time would have been perfect to blend in to local communities and infiltrate - But nope , needed to have a degree at the time .
And the irony over the years that the "blue blood University" recruitment has turned out to have bought in some of the most well known public school traitors, as well some less known who have been "compromised" by the other side with honey traps etc.......
No discrimination but an old school tie helps
That was at least partly true, but personal qualities are what counts now. A lot of the staff at MI5 are female now, which wasn't the case in the past.
He's no Jackson Lamb.
Brilliant interview
"The target you lost sight of goes ahead and succeeds" oh yes, that RINGS A BELL. You want names?
Yes?
@@TesterAnimal1 BBC: "A man has described how he fought off the London Bridge knifeman with a narwhal tusk before pinning him to the ground to help end the attack. Darryn Frost, 38, was seen in pictures confronting Usman Khan, 28, who was armed with two knives."
I also know of Hezbollah agents in London. Not that MI5/6 want to know, but whatever.
it's dumb to have very set very strict criteria on the "type" of history and characteristics a person should have, to be working on problem solving.. it's been proven that it is really good to get people from OUTWITH s field to look at problems as they think outside the box, and can see, or do, things that people within the field can't see/think like/do.. and people change through time.. People who were punks 20 years ago can be conservative now.. i bet loads of people who could be Great in those roles get rejected when really they'd be great assets to a company
We know. They roll through disaster after disaster and only secrecy protects them from the consequences of their extreme incompetence. Right through the Cold War the KGB headed up MI5 counter-intelligence section, for example (source: Peter Wright).
Do you want to employ a person in a sensitive position who, due to past indiscretions, could be compromised or open to blackmail?
They don’t have a strict criteria on the type of person some should be.
Only a base couple of things that most people in the industry have. There are people with all sorts of specialties and skills in intelligence agencies.
@@alannorthdevonuk763 The issue is, they've got blackmail material on recruits (because of this, none of them can go into politics "oh you like flight attendants tied up don't you") while the recruits have no blackmail material on THEM. That means the recruit's life is a daily reality of coercion and threat at the hands of their employer. Imagine you're in a DV interview. Guy's asking you questions and you're expected to answer them truthfully. You can't expect the same from him! So only a complete idiot or an academic would be suckered into this as a career. Result: recruit leaves after 5 years with real experience and knowledge of all sorts of things, with a fake CV about his history at an investment bank (while he knows nothing about investment banking but knows Arabic/Persian, uselessly).
@@RealMalta-fx4sx That was later proven false, though possibly successful Russian black propaganda. Peter Wright was a paranoid right winger.
Love this.
Is this John Cleese from Monty Python ? His edge from his shirt is going upwards. Maybe a secret signal ? What does it mean ? 😂 Is it about shirt integrity ? Give me an appointment. So funny 😂😊
Anonymous, unremarkable, every day guy.
Deeply troubling.
How is this helping the agencies.
That shirt lapel is messing with my feng shui
Nice freudian slip there, buddy. What United Kingdom do you refer to, five eyes?
Beware of the hot dog cart man .
in parts, what he says and what we hear, do not match.
mi5 dont know what a terrorist is these days. a big joke
Special man with alot of secrets!!
Ukraine should be a buffer state it not even European, plus the fact when he first invaded and annexed crimes he turned the water back on
What Ukraine “should be” is UP TO THE FUCKING UKRAINIANS.
N@zi.
Some cheap grammar mistakes on the written questions. Combined with cheap production, you’ve done this guy dirty.
100% agree. Could have been much better.
good video. discussion.
mr. bickford negates to say: all russia wanted, and was agreed was NO ukraine in NATO.
what nation would allow a border country with a shared 1,299mile border to be in NATO?
the day after entrance and the agreement. NATO and US could put every and all offensive element a mile from the russian border.
what leader of nation would accept that? IF china has a military pack and was "buying" mexico to be in it would the US accept 100s of chinese tactical missiles 5miles from el paso texas. not a chance. tanks would role into mexico, if needed to stop it.
russia does that and putin is now: evil and the new "hitler".
sorry the british gentleman is not correct with that.
Five years waiting list to join unless they actually want you to join
If you actually want to be an agent you’re better off going through the military.
Evidence?
Btw, white men can't apply anymore. It literally says when you apply, that applications from from white males will not be processed. They are ONLY recruiting ethnic minorities.
Amazing
I'd actually do it, I might put an application in. I'd be really into it
"Putin has his eye on Ukraine" - prescient.
Most of what Mr Bickford goes on about is internal security and counter-intelligence work. Either he was the legal director of MI5 for much longer than for MI6 or what MI6's does has a higher security clearance level and he cannot talk about it.
Adjusts the mic & i am still straining to hear. Pity
If you want to join MI5 or MI6 you can simply apply on their website.
It isn't their website - it belongs to a front company. Their recruitment is also outsourced.
@@RealMalta-fx4sx OK. You can apply on the website.
If you want to be one you best get to Oxford or Cambridge
@@CaboloNero simply not true, myths like these keep good people out of important jobs. Stop writing what you believe to be true, as if it was a fact you could prove with certainty.
@@CaboloNero100% not true. Most people that work in these agencies (especially the actual operators) are mostly from the military (SAS/SBS) who definitely wouldn’t of done Oxbridge.
Were you at Eton and then Oxbridge?
Yes.
When could you start?
It’s worth reading the book called The Big Breach on this topic.
“I was the former head” - I mean you still are the former head you will be always be that in the future too
Putin not going to stop at Ukraine 😂😂😂😂 keeping the war machine going..
Mi6❤
And when you’ve finished , they “bump-you-off” : like the ones in the Diana operation
The Recruitment departments are as woke as fuck..that is the issue.
You get 7 chakras and the 3rd eye
Someone fix his collar please
I would dearly love to ask a question or two.
I see what you did there.
Hardly the Times crossword but OK.
Interesting...
“Labour-intensive” not “Labour-intense”
So many lies. Spooks NEVER change.
Irrelevant country and irrelevant agency, only thing that make you known is James Bond.
Yet here you are.
His collar is a decoy 🧐
He can’t even get his collar straight 😂
Couldn't lie straight in bed.
Does that matter? Really matter?
MI5 is looking for potential spies with just one GCSE, providing the qualification is in English and it's a grade 4 or above.
10:07 Could be a 'post edit' to what he actually said!
The shirt collar should have been straightened before filming!!!!!!!!!
Big hands.
Ask him about " E Squadron "
Poor editing, LadBible do thees 10 minute interviews much better
This is the only place I find this information. For one moment, I thank you for providing. I'm looking for a British male or female pen pal through you tube that knows about the SAS involvement in the U.S. right now. I can't say much more.
probably training with Delta Force, I mean they do it often and its not really a secret
@@willevans429 Thanks for the quick response. I appreciate the tip. I know that SFOD is no secret anymore either. They've become more transparent.
Why can’t you say more
“Putin has his eye on Ukraine”
Shit Dave, you don’t say
For me,
the movie [Spooks] was fantastic!
🇬🇧🛡
It’s les Paterson !
The minute he said Putin has his eye on Ukraine & they west have to stop him he lost all credibility.
FYI, NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE VALUE OF UNREMARKABLE, EVERY- DAY, AND AVERAGE LOOKING GUYS.
What it would be like to be a fly on the wall and privy to such things.
tbh ............i can hardly stand the long history of war all round the world Britain has been given for centuries............... for the terrible state of our cuntrees now ................
Just maths not psychological factors
America is also secretly trading with russia
No mention of Russian honey pots/traps
Somebody straighten his collar please! 🤨
brilliant so many levels 6.55 clothes adjustment for example
Huh?
Can't stop channel Dinghies
With due respect sir, I would like to drag your attention to the fact that NATO is the reason behind this war, Russia’s request to join NATO was declined everyone knows under who’s constant pressure, Russia is using Ukraine as a buffer state between NATO & Russia, the way China did with Tibet for India, speaking of China the west is failing to understand the fact that China is an economical supporter of this war so I think west should focus on supporters than on leader.
Mi 5 help
Integrity 😂
THEY WOULD LOVE ME
Those random jump cuts from front on to profile shots is bloody annoying, and very amateurish.
Mi 5 come
I think now it depends on how much Putin is prepared to pay them.
Bueni, yo soy deselectira
A very western point of view
Did you expect anything else?
You get what you pay for, nothing more nothing less.
You can get more or less depending on the purchase. Beyonce's poo costs more than plain Jane's from next door but shit's still shit.
Jigsaw pieces …
No CIA is cool. It's cute
Like watching my kid play cars or dinosaurs cute. Totally got CIA back
They adorable. Like dressing a puppy in a sailor suit
I wonder how the old hypocrite justified subcontracting the torture of suspects to less squeamish intelligence services. The famous quote: "Put plenty of sugar in your tea, you'll need it where you're going..."
I rather work for CIgay then the traveling suits mib. CIA got drugs I will work in evidence locker. Or just pay me in drugs. I will take few steps down just to do drugs . Have to dumb it down somehow.
Hilarious ....they have to break in a house ? Yeah right
It was about a metre tall (although I do not carry measuring tape). This creature was within 1.5 metres of me. It was close.
It had a bipedal, Velociraptor/ T-Rex like body (it was on two legs, it was not hopping like a kangaroo, it had two arms and appeared to be holding something in its hands) it had a human shaped and sized head.
The entire face of this head, and the only noticeable features on this head were these two large black oval eyes covering the entire face.
An analogy- imagine a human head, but the eye sockets
extend from the forehead line to the line of the jaw bone covering the entire face with these two large black eyes.
I did not see, and could not make out a mouth, a nose, ears, or hair. It had a tail.
When its head first popped out its body was more upright, as it increased jogging speed it leant forward). It appeared to use the tail for balance.
It did not break eye contact. This creature snuck up on me and stared me down.
This entire scene had lasted only for around 5 seconds.
This strange being of fauna/ creature/ I have no idea what it was (a crazy person fucking knows what it was (people are super smart).
3 years, 8 months ago.
It did not have noticeable scales, feathers, or hair. It appeared to have black skin.
The only colour of this creature was black.
Although it was seen at night, and I do not have the ability to make out colours, it did appear to be the one black colour. Even the eyes were black.
Vibes/my feelings
Described by words and phrases.
Intelligent (looked and acted like a nerdy human) smarter than me, it did sneak up on me.
2.
Tourist vibes- this creature was keen, and interested. It behaved like a scientific academic of aJapanese tourist
A crazy person knows what it was.
A crazy person doesn't get frustrated for not knowing what it was.
I have to keep secrets like an intelligence agent for my own safety.
I do not get paid
Can you lie detect mental illness?
What if they pass?
A mentally ill person doesn't want answers, they have the answers. Like Christians, and Atheists.
Well, MI6 will not contact you in the case of an extraterrestrial or supernatural threat any more than would in the case of the Russian or Iranian threat, because their personal sense of secrecy and exclusivity is more important than the needs of this country or even of the entire world. The most important thing is that they don't contact you for more information about this strange "entity" because then you would know who they are, and that would be terrible! Better let our enemies win than compromise Mr Bond's mystique.
Take your meds.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Si, las viejas del corte ingles
Just a question... why is Britain not catching and imprisoning the terrorists in the country at the moment??? I am sure MI 5/6 must have information on these illegal immigrants in your country??? Looking at the dynamics in Britain, they are running rampant around you???🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦
That would be racist. Lol
@@pbond9405 The woke is just to oooo much for me
Well, the burden of proof lies with the state, so if the state cannot gather sufficient proof of terrorism of a subject it would not make sense to charge said subject with terrorism, because without sufficient evidence they would never get convicted of the crime. -Maybe this shows that most of the people who tend to be called terrorists, are not guilty of terrorism, but possibly something else or maybe nothing?!)
Most people and of course me as well, still want to have due process in the court system, because if not the country would go bananas, anyone would be able to not only get charged, but also convicted of literally any crime or all crimes at any given time! That would be a much worse and worrying place to live in, would it not?! I certainly prefer this imperfect system or the status quo as you could call it, yet it is very important to keep asking questions of how to improve it
If anyone is reading this and/or are unsure about the legal definition of terrorism, it can be summarized into: "A politically/ideological/religious, motivated crime of serious character, to spread fear and/or terror to the general public, with the intent to change and/or disturb the current status quo of the system in place".
The full legal definition is longer and much more precise, look it up if needed.
Correction: I should have wrote judicial system instead of court system
ποιοι σπαις ρε παιδια τι παραμυθια ειναι αυτα
Spies do not exist.
Shush @
😎
Was this video edited by a toddler?
He was not the former Director of MI5 and MI6. MI5 (properly known as The Security Service) and MI6 (more correctly known as The Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), are two separate departments of Government. Each has its own Head - the head of the Security Service is named The Director General. The head of SIS is known as the Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service. The gentleman in the video is neither. He introduced himself as the Head of Legal Services for both the Security Service and the SIS. The presenters of such videos need to take a little more care in describing the contents.
Using DEI
Vox populi, vox dei.
I'm guessing a bit here, but MI6 is above the salt. Mi5 below the salt. Being an ex Sandhurst officer (for 6) or ex cop or soldier (for 5) helps a great deal, esp for 5, where there's a big crossover with the cops anyway and you are trained already etc. Being a talented linguist will also help a great deal. So if you have a skill they want, that’s going to get you a long way.
Was Christopher Steele trained by you? Bunch of bozos, certainly no James Bond!