Pilot Tries to Take Off With Only One Engine
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 чер 2024
- Get your aviation apparel today: theaviationcentral.com/
This is Weekly Dose of Aviation #294
Links to sources:
Pilot Tries to Take Off With Only One Engine - • Airbus A350-1041 Airbu...
St. Elmo's Fire - • St. Elmo’s Fire in an ...
737 No Flap Landing - • Sun Country 737 Emerge...
777 Gear Steering - • B777 Main gear steering
Parallel Takeoff - • SFO United simultaneou...
Landing in Longyearbyen - • Landing in Longyearbye...
I do not claim these clips as my own. All credit goes to the rightful owners. The clips are always used with permission from the owner. If your clip was featured and you want it taken down, send me an e-mail explaining the situation and we'll resolve it.
Want me to feature your video? Submit it here » forms.gle/d5EZHGwkMm9MPVJY9
⤵ SOCIALS:
Twitter » / officiallucaas
Instagram » / officiallucaas
Discord » / discord
TikTok » / lucaasyt
⤵ MUSIC:
Music is provided by Epidemic Sound » www.epidemicsound.com/referra...
Business inquiries? Reach me at » contact.lucaas@gmail.com - Розваги
Those tests where only one engine is used are always so cool. I remember back in the day MD-11 was advertised as a 'safe plane' since it could fly only with two engines🤣
American Airlines 232 (yea ik it's a dc10 but it applies still)
@@LightSpeedFury01YT I flew in a Finnair MD-11 in 1990 - one of the first ever. It suffered an electrical malfunction and had to make an emergency landing. Lights and air went out - it was exciting for this young guy.
the test on this video is done with both engines. You can clearly see the smoke coming from both upon take off.
@@mrkhoros Might be correct and looks that way. Facts are all over the place with these clips lol What is not fiction though, is that that DC-10 and MD-11 were advertised as 'safe' as they could fly with only two engines.
@@mrkhoros I imagine that they still keep the engine turned on but just leave it at idle in case they need the extra power. since this was just a test and not a real emergency, they also could have been using both engines at half the normal power to simulate one engine power, again in case of problems.
That A350 climbs better on one engine than any Aerosucre 727 on all three...
Any Aerosucre 727 packs more cargo than that A350.
@@u2bear377impressive, since a 350-1000's payload capacity isn't too much lower than a 727's MTOW
Aerosucre always loads the aircraft to capacity (MTOW) first and then they load the 5 tonnes of cocaine so they can say that the aircraft did not have any contraband on it when it does crash, "..........no, here is the load sheet, as you can see it is fully loaded with legit stuff, no cocaine here.....", meanwhile the burning cocaine is getting everyone in the area high.
tbh those 727s are past or close to their mgtow.
😆🤣🤣 SO true!
That takeoff simulated a LOSS of engine at V1, reducing one engine's thrust near the last point of being able to abort takeoff.
Started with TWO ENGINES and left ground with ONE full throttle.
Back when pilots could have guests in the cockpit I sat in the engineer’s seat of a 767 for takeoff on the short runway at Mascot (Sydney). The skipper (my wife’s cousin) pointed out marker beside the runway and the airspeed indicator and told me that the pilots breathe easier when the airspeed passes the magic point prior to that marker.
@@geoffmesser5091the 767 doesn’t have an engineer.
And nobody looks at airport markings for that either. 🤷🏻♂️
Sped-up video for Svalbard creates one terrifying landing.
I half expected them to catch a cable with a tail hook
All commercial aircraft equipped with two engines or more are flight tested and certified to take off with one engine out at MTOW.
2:38 "Hey mister, you want to hear the most annoying sound in the world?"
Funny, but funnier when imagining the movie when reading the comment.😄 Nice one!
RIP headphone users
St. Elmos fire also usedti happen on the masts of ships at sea during storms.
the quality & cameramanship on some of these has gotten to be awesome
always makes my night mate, cheers
Was that landing gear audio really needed 😂
That happens on my car too. (yes - it has landing gear)
I don’t understand everyone’s issue with the audio here. Aren’t we all here over a shared love of aviation? This is part of it. I’d be more annoyed if the landing gear clips had some stupid music over them.
That’s the hydraulic system for ya🙃
That 737 that landed with no flaps. Looks like it stopped on the runway? And it might well have been checked for hot brakes.
Most decent sized runways these days are more than big enough to handle a small plane like a 737 landing fast without needing to stress the brake too hard
Had a bit of a wiggle a couple hundred feet after touchdown, too
The S1 failure test was interesting, very good systems on the jet and pilot control for centerline!
Great video thanks 😊😊
The landing gear looks so heavy duty. Love it!
The sheer size alone makes it look heavy duty👀
It was funny recognizing Svalbard from the ProMods map expansion for Euro Truck Simulator 2. Not a perfect replica, but you can see it’s the same place. They did a good job there.
Daaaamn headphone alert for the 777 section…. Lolol
Awesome 😎 videos 📸
Your vibe is infectious, love watching your content!
There's someone on the wing, some ... Thing.
The more I watch the videos, the more
I move away from flying. It's like I'm living by chance.🌺
Thanks for the video..
Looks like it's still running both engines though, you can see the exhaust gas
#1 was at flight idle for this test.
Exactly
Since it is just a test they don't want to fully power down the engine just in case they need full power at short notice
@@TheHobohobbit Exactly. #1 was kept at idle in case a safety issue arose.
If you have passed V1 you must take off with one engine. The airplane is designed to do it that way If necessary.
There was a case of a mandatory rejected takeoff after V1; airplane had suffered some kind of hydraulic failure and could not be controlled via aerodynamic surfaces. Thrust reversers were used and they overran into the runway lights. Could have been a lot worse.
@@joshuahudson2170 Yes if other systems are malfunctional and the plane is not flyable, otherwise it's better to take off and then landing again.
That’s crazy
0:40 Boeing 737 slat failure: engineers have said the wiring to the wings on some aircraft is not routed correctly, which could lead to flap and slat malfunctions. With all of the flap failures, I'm wondering if it's related.
Boing (sic) strikes again.
@@gregedwards1087 what are you talking about? Who Said "Boing?"
Both engines are running . Exhaust can easily be seen in almost equal amounts coming from both sides
Shortly after take-off, exhaust is coming out of the engine that was 'out'.
Great video brother from the imperial county California 👍🇺🇲
0:37 I see 2 engines at work
I wonder what PSI those landing tires run at.
Commercial airline test pilots are one of the bravest people on earth!
LOL NO
This A350-1000 test flight at BSL airport is around 6 years ago! No news
I Want To Become a Airplane Engineer when i grow up
Does st Elmo’s fire flash like that or is is more a flicker that the camera can’t see
Should be pretty accurate. The flashes aren’t regular or tied to the frame rate. It also looks like a 360° shutter which is less susceptible to such effects.
@@EllipticGeometry
Wellllllllll
Typical shutter speed is half the frame rate so you start at missing half the images.
I’m guessing this is a camaeraphone and thay run about 1/200 so it misses 90% of the images.
So by inferences you would expect ten times the flashes.
That’s at least a flicker of not a constant.
@@brucebaxter6923 You can tell by the motion blur that it’s going straight from one exposure to the next. Stop pulling numbers out of thin air. Devices like this use a large range, indeed going for 360 degrees in low light.
@@EllipticGeometry look up the manufacturers specs.
Why would I make it up, I’m already online and manufacturers post their specs
2:38 thanks for leaving the ear killing screeching in the video, great editing!🎉
The rear landing gear rotates?
Yeah, on 777s, 747s, and maybe a couple Airbuses have steering on the rear to reduce turning circles on the ground
The rear landing gear rotates when the nose landing gear reaches a certain angle
A350 is performing a max T/O weight engine failure at V1, with Flex49 limit.
I don't know why, but I kind of want St. Elmo's Fire simulated in X-Plane 12 if it's possible. LOL
the first video, " take off with only one engine " : are you sure ? because we can clearly see smoke and heat escape from the 2 engines at 0:30
The engine is likely on idle
Looked to me like they weren’t gonna be able to rotate safely and the second engine spooled up
An idle engine wouldn’t leave a trail like that. You can see an equal amount of visible propulsion
@@mykneegrow2819if the test was simulating an engine loss at V1, wouldn’t you have to have both engines operating up until V1, then you shut down the thrust from one engine?
@@mykneegrow2819 the test ends at 0:30 where they throttle up. you can also see it looking at the rudder
The 737 landing without flaps did have the leading edge slats deployed. These devices lower stall speed considerably.
I've done it before... in a Cessna 152 💀
Well the engine test doesn't look correct, you can see both exhaust plumes from both engines...
I presume the other engine was at or close to idle encase they needed it.
they'll never cut one engine just in case the other one isn't enough. One of them was in Idle
That what I saw too. Plus why test a takeoff with one engine? Wouldn’t the flight be aborted if an engine failed at takeoff? I knew a plane can fly with one engine because it’s already in the air I never knew it could take off with only one.
@@Tom-ok2rh Once you're passed V1, there's not enough runway left to bring the plane to a safe stop. Hence, all commercial airplanes need to be able to continue the takeoff, even if one engine fails after V1, because that's safer than going off the end of the runway.
@@Tom-ok2rhyou can't abort take off at V1. You have to carry on with the takeoff. That's why they performed this test
No thanks on that tiny northern runway landing.
0:27 I'm seeing 2 exhaust trails from both the engines - is there something I'm missing? It doesn't look like a single engine takeoff like Lucas said
one engine is in idle. of course they don't switch it off, that would be unnecessarily risky. you can also see the throttling it back up at the 0:30 mark
@@MrSchwabentierperfect explanation
Bad clickbait title one again
I sometimes think it is possible to learn more with the sound turned off.
I see smoke trailing from both engines in that 1st clip….
I see smoke on both
yes, when they throttle the engine back up. The test ends at around 0:28
Thank god it wasn't a revenue flight intentionally being flown on asymmetric thrust from takeoff LMFAO
Sure looks to me like there are exhaust plums on both engines, and the left side plum is noticeably lighter than the right
One's at idle. They might have the other a hair below full throttle to simulate it being completely out. "Reduce thrust to idle" is the first item on a lot of Loss of Power checklists.
@@GWNorth-db8vn Thanks for clarifying this
Plum? Plums?
@@inncogneato6341 I stand corrected on the spelling error(s), missing the E, should have typed Plumes.
Whats the song name?
when you have to adjust for the single engine 🙂
A330 be like 0:47
Do they do that engine test with a full load of fuel and passenger weight.
Probably not. At best would be no passengers and full fuel.
Flapless landings are pretty normal.
Struggling to climb you mean
Pretty sure those NEO pilots aren't supposed to be recording at 7k Ft
That annoying noise on the landing gear clip is probably the electric hydraulic pump. It was probably running for the nose steering test.
We were testing the main gear actuators after the right hand one had been replaced
SUNN COUNTRYYYYY
regular dose of Boeing with issues
One engine , no people.
But still at MTOW. That is the requirement for the certification.
What does the fox say?
Corn Pop was a bad dude
ratatatatatatatatatataaatatata
COMPLETELY unnecessary hot brakes for the no-flap Sun Country! Just a slight flare, roll-on, use all the runway... walk in the park. 🙄
That is an A340-200 with two engines and incorrect paint job
Which one?
It wasn't struggling to take off.
how did it takeoff with one engine??????????
That's the sheer power of the RR Trent engines
Twin engine aircraft are required by regulation to be operable with a single engine in case the other engine fails so manufacturers pull out all stops to ensure that they do
give aerosucre that a350
Too brand new, maybe in 50-60 years they might take up one 😂
He didn't try to take off; he did take off. Try to write in correct English
Ok? So what if he wrote one incorrect word??
Try to understand that lots of people around the world speak your language because YOU don't speak theirs.
Interesting content, but bad title.
The pilot didn't TRY to take off. It DID take off. AND there were two engines running, not just one. Two exhaust trails can clearly be seen from both left and right fans. More lies.
They will never shut down that engine. They bring it to idle instead.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183Exactly. Lucaas loves his clickbait, but he’s not THAT bad.
@@inncogneato6341oh yes he is
@@MPRasta104 nah, he isn’t that bad. I’ve seen much worse.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 all of his titles lie. He's a click baiter.
fu ai
It’s not ai
But planes can’t take off with one engine
They are stopped and they are taken to a different plane to fly to the destination.
But I also know that you can do practice takeoffs with one engine.
Yes they can, they are designed to take off with one engine while being at max take off weight. Otherwise imagine an airplane taking off fully loaded and having an engine failure just before lift off, it would crash if one engine would not be strong enough
@@samuelstarbati8393 dude I know that
I didn’t look at the video.
I’m a pilot and I know what planes are and how they are handled. I’ve done takeoffs with one engine and landings with no engine for practice. I fly smaller and private planes.
Prick @@Agent_36
@@Agent_36lol how am I supposed to know with the amount of stupidity in the internet nowadays, just tried to educate ;)
@@samuelstarbati8393 okay that’s fair because people are really frickin stupid nowadays because of all this weird talk people are doing and stupid stuff
If it's a Boeing, I ain't Going.
Yeah whatever 🗿🗿