de Broglie Wavelength | Second Quantum Revolution | Tamil | எலக்ட்ரான் அலையா துகளா?

[@prabanjan.pkavaskar.p7449]

நீண்ட நாட்களாக காத்துக் கிடந்தேன் இந்த கண்ணொளிக்காக 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

[@safeenasatheek3498]

உங்களை எதிர்பார்ப்போடு காத்திருந்தேன்.sir

[@saahith2007]

Poda Naattu Mutta😂😂😂

[@Saravanan-xz1dv]

Jesus with us 🙏 ❤️ 🙌
Samuel sir

[@Therinchuko]

வெற்றிடத்தை நிறைத்து கொண்டு இருப்பது நிறை. 😮

[@aruranganeshan2951]

கையில் மிதக்கும் கனவா நீ
கை கால் முளைத்த அலையா நீ
கையில் ஏந்தியும் கனக்கவில்லையே !
துகளால் செய்த சிலைய நீ..???

[@muthukumar4064]

Kai kaal mulaitha kaatraa ne

[@kircyclone]

துகளால் seidha சிலையா நீ...👍👍

[@faakmal6685]

Thank you sir. I just read this yesterday in my school library it's amazing ❤

[@Suraj-xz8gi]

Sir can you please make video such as" how to study abroad and qualifications required for ug,pg and more...YOU ARE A RIGHT PERSON TO DO SIR!!!

[@vikramathithan_nj1074]

Yeppadi sir irukinga,yellarum nalama family laa❤

[@ScienceWithSam]

அனைவரும் நலம் விக்ரம்

[@vikramathithan_nj1074]

@@ScienceWithSam ungala romba pudikum sir,adha vida neega solli tharathu pudikum

[@saravanank3204]

அருமையான பயனுள்ள தகவல்...
குவாண்டம் கணினியில் ஒளியின் பங்கு என்ன என்பதை அறிந்து கொள்ள ஆவல்...
❤🎉

[@pol_hap9782]

Sam you are a good teacher

[@ScienceWithSam]

♥️ நன்றி

[@GirishMLofficial]

Sir please make videos more often i am really interested in watching u r video everyday as an student who luvs ATOMIC PHYSICS.

[@ScienceWithSam]

♥️ நன்றி

[@scienceknowledge1000]

நன்றி. அருமையான தகவல்கள்..

[@VinayagamoorthySivaperuman]

உங்கள் சேனலுக்கான அங்கீகாரம் விரைவில் கிடைக்கும்.

[@ScienceWithSam]

@@VinayagamoorthySivaperuman ♥️

[@selvakumar-nr4ir]

To move a particle, it needs a force, even though it's tiny, but light doesn't require any force to move because a light wave is constantly going forward by itself from where it formed. Light may have only a wave nature.

[@johnfranchis1630]

Sir,
Thank you so much for the clear and detailed explanation in your video!

[@sckani3432]

Nice. Thank you. Double slit experiment with elecrons could have been included. If necessary, increase the time upto 30 minutes or even slightly more. S Chitrai Kani

[@ScienceWithSam]

♥️🙏

[@user-wz8gw7ex8s]

Very nice

[@mouserider6133]

Nice sir ❤

[@user-uc5ff9tf7c]

Super boss

[@ajayr9751]

Sir wave pocket ah pathi explain panni oru video post pannunga

[@kircyclone]

மரண waiting for the next video...

[@muruganmuru593]

Sir not sure you would be able to read my comments due to your busy work times.. my request is if added a real time small science experiment in videos along with the theorical may bring more attention to video and understanding of concents.

[@trollboy7709]

Bro unga video onnu na meme contentku use pannikava bro

[@ScienceWithSam]

Sure ♥️

[@vigneshvivek2719]

’Double slit experiment in time’ explain pannunga bro

[@dhanasegarandhanush2494]

Sir I watched your previous vedio in that vedio you taught about the photon have mass , i was happy when i watch that vedio, because that vedio supports my special theory of relativity I woundered that the experiment supports my theory and i will belive on futher some experiments support my theory like this .The intresting one in my theory is it obeys time dilation principle and einstein's secial theory of relativity as well as it says that the photon have mass (negligible quantity) like that experiment result while some times i felt that it may be wrong but i don't know about it and i strongly says that my theory is equal to einstein 's theory in this three case 1) v=c therefore m=mp (mass of the photon) where t=1÷0 , 2) v=0 therefore m={1÷0} where t=t', 3) v={1÷0} therefore m=0 where t=0 in the above case shows that v(velocity) inversly propostional to m (mass) though i can't come to conclusion because if it will correct means ,it is a revolution concept in physics sir what's your idea please reply for my Comment

[@lokeshgn8354]

Hi bro,
I am interested to know your theory, could you please explain more clearly about the causes and where you are substituted values,like in which formula.
Thank you.

[@selvakumar-nr4ir]

To move a particle, it needs a force, even though it's tiny, but light doesn't require any force to move because a light wave is constantly going forward by itself from where it formed. Light may have only a wave nature.

[@lokeshgn8354]

@@selvakumar-nr4ir
Any electromagnetic radiation including light are radiated by atom, at that instance they attained velocity of c.
According to Newtown 1st law, even though it has mass, without any force a part can travel constant velocity, so light is also behave as partical

[@dhanasegarandhanush2494]

​@@selvakumar-nr4ir bro did you know about the causes of photoelectric effect ?. and understand that the photon have both nature wave as well as particle. And it dominantly shows a wave nature than paticle nature so that it has a unbeliveable character that is a dual character

[@dhanasegarandhanush2494]

​​@@lokeshgn8354 bro even I didn't know that my theory is correct or wrong and i has one habit that i show my theory when it is correct until i don't show my equation to all but i show only to professor like sir sam so i humbly sorry for say this to you . and thankyou for your support.

[@muruganvel7394]

நன்றி சார்

[@user-ep9wh3il9i]

👏👏👏👌

[@kircyclone]

உங்க video வில் இருந்து தெரிவது என்ன வென்றால்.... நீங்க கல்யாணம் pannikalaamaa வேண்டாமா என்று ஒரு சின்ன குழப்பத்தில் இருக்கிறீர்கள்... அதற்க்கு என் அனுபவத்தில் நான் செல்லும் கருத்து...
வாழ்க்கையில் சந்தோஷம் வேண்டுமென்றால் கல்யாணம் செய்து கொள்ளுங்கள் ...
நிம்மதி வேண்டுமென்றால் கல்யாணம் செய்து kollaadheergal... முடிவு உங்கள் கையில்...😂😂😂😂😂

[@ScienceWithSam]

😂😂 நன்றி

[@k.velmuruganscience1398]

Super❤.
Nuclear physics sub atomic particles video podunga sir.

[@ravisundaram1648]

வணக்கம் தம்பி, கருந்துளை பற்றி ஏதாவது பதிவு தமிழில் இருந்தால் அதன் link கொடுங்க நன்றி.

[@jailani3585]

🎉

[@VinayagamoorthySivaperuman]

அண்ணா இப்போது உள்ள தொழில்நுட்பத்தை வைத்து நம்மால் எவ்வளவு anti matter ஐ உருவாக்க முடியும்.anti matter bomb வெடித்தால் என்ன விளைவுகள் ஏற்படும் anti matter இன்ஜின் உருவாக்க வாய்ப்பு உள்ளதா.நம்மால் பால்வெளி மண்டலம் விட்டு வெளியில் செல்ல முடியுமா

[@ScienceWithSam]

Only very very small quantity is produced

[@rainfallscienceintamil]

Superb 🎉🎉🎉❤❤

[@MM-dh3wr]

நீயே ஒளியானால் எதைக்காண்பாய்?

[@sarathkumar361]

Simulation theory video upload sir🥺

[@joyenjoy7333]

Thankyou professor

[@sridharannatesan592]

Louis de brollies was simply brilliant

[@risheerox8755]

Anna munna maari long video podunga ❤❤

[@ScienceWithSam]

Will try

[@truthalonetriumphs1350]

I know that I am a wave form 😊😊😊😊

[@kircyclone]

வாழ்க்கையே அலை pole
நாமெல்லாம் அதன் மேலே...😂😂😂

[@MakeshKumar007]

எனக்கு எதுவும் விளங்கவில்லை... கணிதம் மற்றும் இயற்பியல் அடிப்படையில்... இருப்பினும் படிக்கிறேன்....
Mass in Special Relativity TheoryThe word “mass” has two implications in special relativity: invariant mass (likewise called the rest mass) that is similar for all observers in all reference frames; while the relativistic mass is reliant on the velocity of the observer. As indicated by the idea of mass-energy relativity, invariant mass is identical to rest energy, while relativistic mass is identical to relativistic energy. The expression "relativistic mass" tends not to be utilized in particle and nuclear physics. It is the mass of the body that changes with the change in the body’s speed as its speed approaches the speed of light, i.e., 3 × 108 m/s.What Will You Learn Here?This page will discuss the mass of light, a relativistic mass, relativistic speed, rest mass formula, and the relativistic mass formula.Rest MassAccording to the theory of special relativity, the rest mass is called the invariant mass that remains invariant for all the observers in various frames of reference. The invariant mass is another name for the rest mass of particles inside the system. In contrast, the rest mass is preferred over the rest energy (E). Hence, invariant mass is a characteristic unit of mass utilized for systems that are being seen from their focal point/centre of mass (COM frame).
Point To Note:The idea of invariant mass doesn't need bound systems of particles. In such a case, it might likewise be applied to systems of unbound particles in high-speed relative motion. Along these lines, it is regularly utilized in particle physics for systems that comprise broadly isolated high-energy particles. Assuming such frameworks were obtained from a solitary particle, the calculation of the invariant mass of such frameworks, which is a never-changing quantity, will give the rest mass of the parent particle (since it is preserved over a long period).Rest Mass FormulaIt is helpful in computation that the invariant mass of a system is the total energy of the system divided by c2 in the COM frame (where, by definition, the momentum of the system is zero).The rest mass is denoted by mo.So, the rest mass formula is:mo = E/c2Rest Mass is a Conserved MassThe invariant mass of any system is likewise a similar quantity in every single inertial frame, it is a quantity determined from the total energy in the COM frame. Following the calculation of the rest mass in the aforementioned method, the rest mass is also used to compute system energies and momenta in other frames where the momenta are not zero, where the total energy will fundamentally be unexpectedly different as compared to the COM frame.Similarly, as with energy and momentum, the invariant mass of a system (having multiple particles) can't be varied or changed, and it is in this manner monitored that the rest mass of the system cannot be destroyed or changed; thus, it remains conserved, as long as the system is not prone to all influences

[@MakeshKumar007]

எனக்கு எதுவும் புரியவில்லை... ஆனால் இதில் ஏதோ ஒன்று ஒளிந்து இருக்கிறது.... அதை என்னால் புரிந்து கொள்ள முடியவில்லை...🤔🤨😊🤗
When one of the bodies is much larger than the other, as is true for Earth and anything on its surface, its mass predominates. Every object on Earth's surface is attracted to the center of the planet with a force proportional to its mass, giving rise to the adage: "whatever goes up must come down," which is true as long as the object isn't moving fast enough to leave the ground and go into orbit.
Other planets exert the same type of gravitational force on objects on their surface, but the magnitude of this force is different. It depends not only on the planet's mass, but also its density, because the denser a planet is, the more mass there is under your feet pulling you down.
The Gravity of Different Planets
On Earth, falling objects experience an acceleration of 9.8 m/s2 due to Earth's gravitational force, and that is defined as 1 g. The easiest way to discuss the gravitational force on other planets is to express it as a fraction of Earth's g-force.
Jupiter is the largest planet, so you would expect it to have the largest gravitational force, and it does. The reasoning doesn't extend the other way, though. Mercury is the smallest planet, but its surface gravity is about the same as that of the much larger Mars because Mercury is more dense. Similarly, Saturn is much larger than Earth, but it's much less dense, so the gravitational force on Saturn is about the same as it is on Earth.
The gravity you would experience on each of the planets in the solar system if you were standing on the surface or, in the case of the ice giants, floating in the atmosphere, is:
Mercury: 0.38 g
Venus: 0.9 g
Moon: 0.17 g
Mars: 0.38 g
Jupiter: 2.53 g
Saturn: 1.07 g
Uranus: 0.89 g
Neptune: 1.14 g
The Gravitational Pull of the Planets
All the planets exert a gravitational pull on Earth, but except for the sun and moon, the magnitude of this pull is basically negligible. This is due to the vast distances between the Earth and the other planets. The gravitational force varies inversely with the square of the distance between bodies but directly only with the first power of mass, so distance is more important.
The moon is small, but it's the closest body to Earth, so its gravitation is strongest. If you express the tidal forces, of all other planets in terms of the moon's force, the results are as follows:
Moon: 1
Sun: 0.4
Venus: 6 × 10-5
Jupiter: 3 × 10-6
Mercury: 4 × 10-7
Saturn: 2 × 10-7
Mars: 5 × 10-8
Uranus: 3 × 10-9
Neptune: 8 × 10-10
Planetary Gravitational Influences Fluctuate
The planets aren't stationary. Their distance from Earth changes and so, accordingly, does their gravitational influence on our home planet. The magnitude of the force can vary by as much as an order of magnitude. This may be one reason why astrologers throughout the ages have found a correspondence between the positions of the planets and conditions on Earth.

[@UdhayakkhUdhayakkh]

Super

[@MakeshKumar007]

நண்பா... என் மனதில் ஒரே ஒரு கேள்வி மட்டுமே... இப்போது எழுகிறது.... !!?? 😉🤔🤨...
இந்த பிரபஞ்சத்தில் எந்த பொருளுக்கும் ( REST MASS ) இருப்பதாக தோன்றவில்லை....
ஏன் என்றால்... அனைத்து விதமான பொருட்களுமே... ஒரு குறிப்பிட்ட வேகத்தில் நகர்ந்து கொண்டே இருக்கிறது....
the surface of the earth at the equator rotates at a speed of 460 meters per second or roughly 1,000 miles per hour.
Earth orbits around the sun at a speed of 67,100 miles per hour (30 kilometers per second)
The rotational speed of the Sun is about 2.2 km s-1.
The sun and the solar system appear to be moving at 200 kilometers per second, or at an average speed of 448,000 mph (720,000 km/h). Even at this rapid speed, the solar system would take about 230 million years to travel all the way around the Milky Way.
What is the rotational velocity of the Milky Way?
For example, in our Galaxy the circular velocity at the solar distance from the Galactic Centre is 220 km s−1 (i.e. at R0 = 8.0 kpc from the centre).
The Milky Way's velocity is approximately 552 kilometers per second (km/s) relative to the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is the radiation leftover from the Big Bang
how fast is the universe expanding nasa?
By characterizing the detailed structure of the cosmic microwave background fluctuations, WMAP has accurately determined the basic cosmological parameters, including the Hubble constant. The current best direct measurement of the Hubble constant is 73.8 km/sec/Mpc (give or take 2.4 km/sec/Mpc including, both random and systematic errors), corresponding to a 3% uncertainty. Using only WMAP data, the Hubble constant is estimated to be 70.0 km/sec/Mpc (give or take 2.2 km/sec/Mpc), also a 3% measurement. This assumes that the universe is spatially flat, which is consistent with all available data. This measurement is completely independent of traditional measurements using Cepheid variables and other techniques. However, if we do not make an assumption of flatness, we can combine WMAP data with other cosmological data to get 69.3 km/sec/Mpc (give or take 0.8 km/sec/Mpc), a 1% solution that combines different kinds of measurements. After noting that independent observations give consistent results, it is reasonable to combine information to get the best estimate of parameters.

[@leeleonardo6152]

Thalaivaa sunitha villiam ku enna Achiii

[@VinayagamoorthySivaperuman]

Sir next video

[@ScienceWithSam]

Sorry for the delay. Held up in a tight work schedule. Soon I will make a video. Thank you

[@Karthikeyan.SIX-B]

Sir is there any reason for why the electron spin creates magnetic field perpendicular to the spin? Sir If in any one of the video if you already said about this please mention sir ?

[@pradeep517]

ua-cam.com/video/uRcF7_pClSM/v-deo.htmlsi=4u7CQxuBQCh4wH5G

[@pradeep517]

Watch this. you get idea

[@thangarajm2093]

Excellent sir... history and cricket ball example ❤

[@notalkhere9676]

May be திண்மை

[@VinayagamoorthySivaperuman]

அண்ணா எப்போ அறிவியல் சம்பந்தமான வீடியோ போடுவிங்க 10 நாள் ஆகுது

[@ScienceWithSam]

கூடிய விரைவில் 🙂

[@praveenm8460]

mass na nirai thana...

[@ScienceWithSam]

Someone says திணிவு

[@leeleonardo6152]

Ss squad👽✨

[@muthukumar4064]

My 12th std physics bro. But nice explanation

[@dharanidharan.s]

He is not bro. He is an physics professor

[@muthukumar4064]

​@@dharanidharan.sgood invention

[@vsparthiban2679]

தம்பி, எந்த கேள்வி கேட்டாலும், காற்றோடு போனது போல் நீ கண்டு கொள்ளாது போவது, உமது காணொளியை காணும் ஆர்வத்தை குறைக்கிறது. இருந்தாலும் கேட்கிறேன்.
E=MC^2
Energy=Mass x light velocity square
எல்லாவற்றுக்கும் ஒரு அலகு (Unit) உண்டு. அப்படி E க்கு அதன் formula படி E=MC^2
Mass in gram
Speed of light=km/sec
E=gram * (km/sec)^2
E=g*km^2/sec^2 என்ற unit ல் Energy ஐ குறிப்பதாக தெரியவில்லை.
In fact, Energy is common name. So many energies are there. Like heat energy, light energy, sound energy, potential energy, kinetic energy etc. Depending upon the kind of energy the unit will differ.
உங்கள் முன் நான் ஒரு முட்டாளாக கூட இருக்கலாம். ஆனால், என் மனதில் இப்படி எல்லாம் வினா எழுகிறது. முடிந்தால் விளக்குக.

[@ScienceWithSam]

Sir kinetic energy is 1/2 mv2. So its the same unit. You can get joule by unit conversion

[@vsparthiban2679]

@@ScienceWithSam OK sir, but my question is what about the unit for E=MC^2.
anyhow, I lot of thanks for your response.

[@sarathkumar361]

Ss army 🪖

[@user-my7su1kl5h]

அது உண்மைய கூட இருக்கலாம் 😂 அனுபவம் 😅

[@vigneshwaran1865]

Hai Sam sir may i know your _ Phy _ or __PGP__ ?????

[@ScienceWithSam]

I am 01-04 UG

[@vigneshwaran1865]

@@ScienceWithSam sirappu sir

[@techh4ck936]

Hi bro,
ua-cam.com/video/K823D9Y0cE0/v-deo.html
Maybe I was wrong, but according to this video content, they mention that using this shortest light pulse, we can capture the electron's position and momentum. But you already told me it's not possible to find the electron's movement and position at the same time, correct bro?
Can you please explain this and what advantages there are to using this?