Budget Magic: $68 (8 tix) Artifact Blast Affinity (Modern)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @DiogoVKersting
    @DiogoVKersting 6 років тому +212

    One copy of Teferi, Hero of Dominaria: 30 tix.
    Artifact Blast Affinity (whole deck): 8 tix.
    Beating UW control with a superbudget list: priceless.

    • @Cincinnatijames
      @Cincinnatijames 6 років тому +11

      Deck is 22tix now

    • @Kurse_of_Kall
      @Kurse_of_Kall 6 років тому +32

      @@Cincinnatijames The "probably better known as Saffron Olive" effect.

    • @Tupiaz
      @Tupiaz 6 років тому +7

      @@Cincinnatijames Still cheaper than one Teferi.

    • @adammoldover8769
      @adammoldover8769 6 років тому +1

      Was this deck really 7 tix when recording? I would have definitely tried to pick it up at that point. 27 tix? Eh... not so much

    • @DenizenCain
      @DenizenCain 5 років тому +1

      @@adammoldover8769 Only 12 now.

  • @flowji10
    @flowji10 6 років тому +100

    This deck should just be called Team Rocket, because each round you're blasting off again

  • @josephhawkins7974
    @josephhawkins7974 6 років тому +27

    I love that you got more aggressive with the blasts as you played more games with the deck.

  • @therightstick579
    @therightstick579 6 років тому +23

    I’ve seen a version of this deck that I think is even better. It replaces the ghostfire blades with ensouls. The deck can attack with a 5/5 flying lifelink on turn 2 (vault skirge). The deck uses that early push (which is very consistent) to put the opponent in blasting range. That deck solves some of the problems this deck has, and is only about $5-10 more expensive for a few shivan reefs and some spires of industry

    • @tomjackal5708
      @tomjackal5708 6 років тому

      that does sound like a pretty solid improvement, and the inventor's fair seemed totally pointless

    • @obesechicken13
      @obesechicken13 6 років тому +14

      That sounds like more of a sidegrade than an improvement. It adds blue which is more expensive and leaves you really open to 2 for 1s. How many of these games would path have been a 2 for 1 on ensoul here?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +8

      Sounds sweet!

    • @alainkaizer7769
      @alainkaizer7769 6 років тому +1

      They actually have a version of that deck back in 2015 that played ensouls and 8 blasts and even have a set of tarmogoyf, it was based on the UR artifact deck that Mike Sigrist topped 8 during pro tour origins i think.

    • @paolomartinbueno8870
      @paolomartinbueno8870 6 років тому +2

      Not a modern player here but turn 2 vault skirge with ensoul artifact is a 2 for 1 with fatal push widely used in modern. I think it's a bad exchange for me. If it slips in 1 attack then yeah, that's what we want but that doesn't usually go that way.

  • @XR_TRON
    @XR_TRON 6 років тому +33

    This deck was a blast to watch. I'll show myself out.

    • @_daze
      @_daze 4 роки тому

      Tron wow that’s profile pic doesn’t match

  • @ExtremeMusicPromotion
    @ExtremeMusicPromotion 5 років тому +4

    4 Cranial Plating
    4 Darksteel Citadel
    4 Ensoul Artifact
    4 Galvanic Blast
    3 Ghostfire Blade
    1 Hope of Ghirapur
    2 Island
    4 Memnite
    3 Mountain
    4 Ornithopter
    4 Scalding Tarn
    4 Shrapnel Blast
    4 Signal Pest
    4 Spirebluff Canal
    3 Springleaf Drum
    2 Steam Vents
    2 Sulfur Falls
    4 Vault Skirge

  • @warpdrivefueledbyinsomnia8165
    @warpdrivefueledbyinsomnia8165 6 років тому +2

    This is what Affinity actually used to look like. The blasts are so underrated.

  • @lumorowenamooncaller9811
    @lumorowenamooncaller9811 2 роки тому +1

    This deck needs an update with all the great red artifacts that just came out of Kamigawa Neon Dynasties! Sacrificing a Reinforced Ronin after attacking seems petty cute. And Rabbit Battery is an easy swap in for Ghostfire Blade

  • @luliby2309
    @luliby2309 6 років тому +5

    That was cool Seth.
    I had a blast.

  • @Anynewprovince
    @Anynewprovince 6 років тому +54

    I never knew I'd want to exclaim "Blastoff!" while winning a match of Magic but here we are.

    • @Jonzin4BeatzNYC
      @Jonzin4BeatzNYC 6 років тому +1

      Pauper in da house!
      Could the double blast spells work in an atog affinity deck? Is it Possibly Pauper Playable?

  • @ethanfordford6621
    @ethanfordford6621 6 років тому +79

    8 blast...

    • @docpepperclassic
      @docpepperclassic 6 років тому +1

      Ethan Ford Ford Clearly the correct deck name.

    • @AndrewWoodford
      @AndrewWoodford 6 років тому

      I’m running mine as 8 Whack 8 Blast

  • @xdkurt
    @xdkurt 6 років тому +45

    the only burn deck without lighting bolt.

    • @patrast5315
      @patrast5315 6 років тому +3

      should be in there tho

    • @BlaineTog
      @BlaineTog 6 років тому +13

      Who wants to pay R for 3 damage when you could get 4 damage instead?

    • @Justadeathgod
      @Justadeathgod 6 років тому +1

      renundancy... if you can't blast them, bolt them.

    • @theunicornsrock
      @theunicornsrock 5 років тому

      You know what would fix that?
      4 bolts

  • @moneyforshort
    @moneyforshort 6 років тому +8

    A couple punts, one being against blue black game 2 you could have activated fair in response to ornathopter dying. Overall really good running with ultra budget

    • @trancet
      @trancet 6 років тому +1

      Yeah, not activating Fair was killing me

  • @the_snakelicious
    @the_snakelicious 6 років тому +7

    It's already 21 tix, the SaffronOlive effect is strong.

  • @Mike-qx2iy
    @Mike-qx2iy 6 років тому +3

    This reminds me of my friends old affinity deck where he ran 8 blasts along side of thoughtcast, good work!

  • @char6547
    @char6547 6 років тому +2

    This seems like a good deck to get into modern with because it can build into hardened scales or normal affinity and gets stronger as you slowly add the rest of the pieces. The first upgrade would probably be in this order, steel overseer, inkmoth, then arcbound ravager, and then finally the mox opals. Of course mox opals are a good first upgrade if you have the money for them, but overseer seems like the most immediate boon to the deck.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      Yeah, that's one of the upsides is it does upgrade into a couple of tier decks!

  • @hardkenya2820
    @hardkenya2820 6 років тому +16

    I freaked out when i discovered that the thing that signal pest shoot the beam from is it's claw and not it's mouth

    • @thoop6795
      @thoop6795 2 роки тому

      Yeah it took me 5 years to realize lol

  • @TalesOfDylan
    @TalesOfDylan 6 років тому +2

    Man I loved this video, all those top tier mega expensive decks crushed. Sometimes Magic really is as beautiful game.

  • @jameryan9280
    @jameryan9280 6 років тому +5

    This deck brings back good ol' memories where you blew up bombs with Shrapnel Blast.

    • @jameryan9280
      @jameryan9280 6 років тому

      IKR! But I was talking about Spellbombs

  • @brianokafor9748
    @brianokafor9748 6 років тому +3

    51:03 This is what magic is all about...having fun 😋🤣🤣

  • @ItaliansShredsBetter
    @ItaliansShredsBetter 6 років тому

    Congrats Seth for this deck, it was... A blast!

  • @wshayne
    @wshayne 6 років тому +2

    At 41:00, you could sac fair for an etched champion and Stonewall the khalitas, preventing lifelink

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      Hmm, I never really expected to have enough mana to sac Inventor's Fair. GOod call!

  • @Atmapalazzo
    @Atmapalazzo 6 років тому +3

    13:02 I was almost hoping for a "nobody expects the mana tithe!" play to come down

    • @grim3646
      @grim3646 6 років тому

      Atmapalazzo that would’ve been too hilarious if that happened XD

    • @simonerocutto6461
      @simonerocutto6461 6 років тому

      I thought the same lul

  • @mikejh1604
    @mikejh1604 4 роки тому

    Love this deck, borrowed it from my LGS to try modern and loved it. Now I have my own U/W/G flicker deck based off yours. Thank you for (I’m a way) getting into this format

  • @lizardoo8632
    @lizardoo8632 6 років тому +18

    Game: 7:35
    7:35
    7:35

    • @kevinsun7617
      @kevinsun7617 6 років тому +1

      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35

    • @kevinsun7617
      @kevinsun7617 6 років тому +1

      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:357:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:357:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:357:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:357:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35
      7:35

    • @dankurach5340
      @dankurach5340 6 років тому +1

      Some hero’s don’t wear capes.

  • @breezy19526
    @breezy19526 6 років тому

    I brewed up a version of this last week on your website! Happy to see you play it :)

  • @therightstick579
    @therightstick579 6 років тому +6

    You already know some random card from this deck will quadruple in price. It’s happened to psionic blast, goblin lore, and even kinda bloodghast after the reprint

  • @shatzinorris1417
    @shatzinorris1417 6 років тому +2

    You should try Experimental Affinity !
    A built-around version could be insane

  • @ScottysSide
    @ScottysSide 6 років тому +2

    1:00:24 "It was a blast!" Dammit, Seth!

  • @lionkingmatiouz3441
    @lionkingmatiouz3441 6 років тому +1

    Great agressive strategy
    Cool to watch and interesting to try it out

  • @Canadian_Ry
    @Canadian_Ry 6 років тому

    It was a blast!
    Been working on something similar. This gives me some hope for my deck project. Thanks!

  • @malikismyname
    @malikismyname 6 років тому

    Oh my!❤ They will write songs about this deck in magic heaven.

  • @___ooobodybagooo___
    @___ooobodybagooo___ 6 років тому +158

    *Stony Silence entered the chat*

    • @reye_bruh
      @reye_bruh 6 років тому +16

      *opt into terminus enters the chat*

    • @alaricpaley6865
      @alaricpaley6865 6 років тому +5

      But. That stops... What exactly? Plating?

    • @Atmapalazzo
      @Atmapalazzo 6 років тому +13

      Stopping your citadels and springleafs is actually a huge issue. This deck doesn't get hit as hard by stony as normal affinity, but like scales affinity, it will still be set back if an opponent slams a turn 2 stony.

    • @char6547
      @char6547 6 років тому

      It doesn't even seem that good against this build.

    • @char6547
      @char6547 6 років тому

      @@Atmapalazzo Turn 2 stony is really good against hardened scales not only because of that, but almost all power cards in the deck are strong because of their activated abilities.

  • @y3tti627
    @y3tti627 6 років тому

    I love how the price of the deck according to Seth increases from $60 slowly to $70 at the end

  • @johna.1357
    @johna.1357 6 років тому

    I wanted to play Shrapnel Blast so much!
    Now I can!!

  • @Azuth65
    @Azuth65 6 років тому +3

    It's great the MTGO price has tripled in under a day... Great job with the SaffronOlive Effect Seth :P That said, probably going to build this for the next FNM.

  • @Moonlit_sky_with_stars
    @Moonlit_sky_with_stars 6 років тому +1

    The gotcha factor for this deck is really fun

  • @pphtm
    @pphtm 6 років тому

    If you add 8 whacks and a few more goblins you can run goblin grenade. Goblin Wardriver seems really good here too. I feel they fit the synergy really well.

  • @altitudemanagement
    @altitudemanagement 6 років тому

    FYI Blinkmoth can pump the other Blinkmoth, like @26:27 you could have activated one and used the other to pump for more damage.

  • @Eledan13
    @Eledan13 6 років тому +16

    Is seth a little too shy in playing around counters? I feel like the opponent is tapped down mostly and seth still doesn't go for it. Is that right?

    • @josephhawkins7974
      @josephhawkins7974 6 років тому +6

      Sometimes he really is.

    • @andrewshirley9240
      @andrewshirley9240 6 років тому +10

      His play seemed fine in this one as far as I could tell. Running your only reach into what is 95% going to be a counterspell when you need every single one of those reach spells to resolve is a bad idea. Better to wait for them to go for a big play, or to try and play a smaller persistent threat that may draw out counters or require a big tap-out. The only exception is if the opponent is like 1 card in hand, or if you're so far out of it that you NEED to burn them out that turn.

    • @BlaineTog
      @BlaineTog 6 років тому +2

      Patience is a virtue.

    • @Eledan13
      @Eledan13 6 років тому +3

      @@andrewshirley9240 I think this is the case except he only needed 2 to resolve and he had 4. On his end step he could have used three and almost certainly overwhelmed the counters. I think he'd have to have spell Pierce or some nonsense to get out of if

    • @Tupiaz
      @Tupiaz 6 років тому +1

      Seth is mostly a control player so he doesn't play super aggressive when he plays aggro decks. I'm a aggro player myself but this is a very good video showcasing how it can be beneficial to play with patience.

  • @andrewf6167
    @andrewf6167 5 років тому

    Love this. Would like a non-budget updated version :)

  • @aaronnava5656
    @aaronnava5656 6 років тому

    This is a great meta deck. The deck looks a lot like Affinity when you play against it, but Affinity usually doesn't run that may big red burn spells. The deck wouldn't be as good if people knew what was coming, but hilariously, they did not.

  • @thundurus7935
    @thundurus7935 6 років тому

    I really want to see more of this deck
    This is awesome

  • @guillermocortes4415
    @guillermocortes4415 6 років тому +2

    I complained on the Goblin Prison video, this was the exact opposite. It was a BLAST!
    Pun not withstanding, fun deck and great showcase!

  • @CuriousShrimp
    @CuriousShrimp 6 років тому +1

    Awesome deck
    I was looking to play affinity in Modern but simply did not have the money for the moxes. This - solves - EVERYTHING 😁

  • @johnmarx
    @johnmarx 6 років тому +4

    I really like this video. You should do more budget versions of competitive decks. Like budget tron or something. I think it would be cool. 👍

  • @lsmith12341985
    @lsmith12341985 6 років тому +1

    The real artifact burn. Play 3x implements, terrarion or chromatic star. Sack all 3 to play a free titan and draw 3 cards. Nut draw is t1 Darksteel Citadel egg t2 land egg egg sack 3 eggs free titan draw 3. T3 Ensoul darksteel citadel and swing for 11.
    Implement of Combustion x4
    Implement of Ferocity x4
    Implement of Improvement x4
    Terrarion x4
    Chormatic Star x4
    Ensoul Artifact x4
    Shrapnel Blast x4
    Galvanic Blast x4
    Lightning Bolt x2
    Glint-Nest Crape x4
    Salvage Titan x4
    Stubborn Denial x2
    Shivan Reef x4
    Spire of Industry x4
    Darksteel Citaldel x4
    Island x2
    Mountain x2

  • @johna.1357
    @johna.1357 6 років тому

    This one is the most legit modern budget deck for last two years

  • @vintagecombo877
    @vintagecombo877 6 років тому

    That deck looks like it’s a blast to play

  • @LeKrutes
    @LeKrutes 6 років тому +1

    Misses that he can pump blinkmoth nexus with another nexus. Cool deck.

  • @Zetimenvec
    @Zetimenvec 6 років тому

    I think the only thing separating this from non-budget and budget is the lack of mox opals. Adding 4 would be expensive, but would improve the performance by a mile.

  • @brighamschellinger147
    @brighamschellinger147 6 років тому

    I actually really liked this. I kinda wouldn't mind buying this and then slowly upgrading to the mono green or traditional versions of affinity.

  • @metalfreekz13
    @metalfreekz13 6 років тому +1

    I built this deck a while ago, and since another name people use for Affinity is "Robots," I called my build "Blastbots."

  • @Kurse_of_Kall
    @Kurse_of_Kall 6 років тому +1

    25:52 couldn't you have used springleaf on ornithopter to activate blinkmoth and attack for more damage? It's not like the 1 colorless from blinkmoth being untapped is relevant here.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      We could have, although leaving up two mana for Shrapnel Blast is nice cover for a removal spell.

  • @jostme12
    @jostme12 6 років тому +10

    how does this not play kuldotha rebirth and Bushwhacker for the whackening? you'll still have plenty of artifacts but have some very powerful draws with signal pest and whacker. and they are both budget cards, were what my first modern deck was based around.

    • @1261JAHO
      @1261JAHO 6 років тому +9

      What you are describing is a deck called "Go-Bots"

    • @1261JAHO
      @1261JAHO 6 років тому +3

      Minus the Shrapnel Blast

    • @jostme12
      @jostme12 6 років тому +3

      @@1261JAHO Didn't realize it had a name, thank you for the new information

    • @rat488
      @rat488 6 років тому +1

      also this deck does something that deck doesn't it has the face damage from the burn cards. kuldotha rebirth and bushwacker means your cutting shrapnel blast and arcbound worker probably so your dome hits are not as strong after the board stabilizes.

    • @abisadeonasanwo2789
      @abisadeonasanwo2789 6 років тому

      I actually play this irl if you were interested in what a list like that could look like. Its also got a dual goblin theme for goblin grenade.
      4 [HOU:181] Ramunap Ruins
      4 [SOM:174] Memnite
      4 [KLD:199] Bomat Courier
      3 [OGW:116] Reckless Bushwhacker
      3 [DDT:45] Goblin Grenade
      3 [MRD:106] Shrapnel Blast
      4 [M15:223] Ornithopter
      4 [ZEN:125] Goblin Bushwhacker
      4 [MED:102] Lightning Bolt
      3 [SOM:96] Kuldotha Rebirth
      4 [GTC:97] Legion Loyalist
      3 [KLD:235] Smuggler's Copter
      4 [MBS:131] Signal Pest
      1 [MBS:144] Contested War Zone
      12 [HOU:188] Mountain
      SB: 3 [M19:128] Alpine Moon
      SB: 2 [DST:117] Dragon's Claw
      SB: 2 [DKA:149] Grafdigger's Cage
      SB: 2 [GTC:106] Skullcrack
      SB: 2 [GPT:75] Shattering Spree
      SB: 2 [ALA:218] Relic of Progenitus
      SB: 2 [SHM:107] Smash to Smithereens

  • @117Chief930
    @117Chief930 6 років тому

    I feel like this deck wants 1-2 experimental frenzies somewhere in it. Put it out on turn 3 or when the topdeck wars begin. Should wrap it up nicely from there.

  • @stefanmettler9021
    @stefanmettler9021 6 років тому

    you could say playing this deck is a blast

  • @josejesuscontrerassalazar9140
    @josejesuscontrerassalazar9140 6 років тому

    Interesting. I built a deck similar to this like a couple of years ago. The difference is that I splashed blue for Ensoul Artifact and sideboard had Etched Champion and Ghost Blade.

  • @tomjackal5708
    @tomjackal5708 6 років тому +1

    it's an established fact on this channel that high damage burn spells do really well in modern, no surprise that instant_speed_goblin_grenade.deck is working

  • @XaviFornells
    @XaviFornells 6 років тому

    Seth I think we can get more power if we splash blue to the deck because, we can put ensoul artifact and thoughtcast! We could cut out ghostfire and worker =O

  • @jamezdizzle23
    @jamezdizzle23 6 років тому

    Sounds like you were having a blast. Who knew bad affinity could be so good?

  • @billyalvis8621
    @billyalvis8621 6 років тому

    This deck looks like a blast to play...

  • @tacobellplease
    @tacobellplease 5 років тому +1

    maybe a few pias revolution? I don't know what to take out for that.. maybe a ghost fire Blade and a worker? it might just slow down the deck to much.. or just get countered. any thoughts? I also like x1 hope of ghiruper...

    • @benhensley3621
      @benhensley3621 4 роки тому

      This seems like an interesting sideboard card, but also seems a bit slow- just like the one of Girapur Aether Grid. Why that's good in the slot is because you can slowly ping your opponents like in the second(?) match. It also fades to hexproof, though- so I doubt it's worth a consideration.

  • @legolas-zg5cc
    @legolas-zg5cc 6 років тому +1

    Atog and ravenous intruder, zero drop artifacts, thud, or double strike with mox opal= fun

  • @danielstarr2264
    @danielstarr2264 6 років тому

    My only thought is why not just play bolt over Ghostfire blade? The three damage seems good enough when sometimes you just attack for a million and there are no nonbos with bolt other than it doesn't add +1 to a cranial

  • @silentCee
    @silentCee 6 років тому

    I think Pia's revolution would help add some synergy with the sacrifice costs, it's also only 3 mana so turn 2 with spring leaf

  • @plasia
    @plasia 6 років тому

    "Nice Teferi" love it lol!

  • @fhernands
    @fhernands 6 років тому

    If you put 4 lighting bolts into it, would it be considered 12 Bot-bolts?

  • @newhampshirenate
    @newhampshirenate 6 років тому +6

    ATTENTION! 19 minus 6 equals 12! So speaks Lord Saffron Olive! - ;-)

  • @manuelaguilartirado8674
    @manuelaguilartirado8674 6 років тому +19

    8 tix?? the heck

    • @Kurse_of_Kall
      @Kurse_of_Kall 6 років тому +6

      22 now, The "probably better know as Saffron Olive" effect strikes again! LOL the deck nearly triples in price and it's still cheaper than dirt.

  • @B166ER-
    @B166ER- 6 років тому

    I came up with this exact deck a few months ago, minus the ghost fire blade which makes no sense to me. Mine had mishra's bauble and splashed white for path and helix

  • @michaeldegrave5905
    @michaeldegrave5905 6 років тому +6

    Not a single copy of Artifact Blast in this deck.

  • @karstenneal1237
    @karstenneal1237 5 років тому

    hey seth why come did u not side in the etched champion? Seems good against anger/path and bolt and helix. Does get settled and non damage based swept but still seems resilient.

  • @jacobsocia3966
    @jacobsocia3966 6 років тому

    This deck is insane

  • @SpartanJAX48
    @SpartanJAX48 6 років тому

    Why not splash blue for Thoughtcast? Loved this deck!

  • @MisterMomotaro1996
    @MisterMomotaro1996 6 років тому +1

    My first thought was "Artifact Blast is legal in Modern?"
    That's how you know I'm an EDH player

  • @cz19856
    @cz19856 6 років тому

    A blast from the past

  • @aos_scalemodelling8798
    @aos_scalemodelling8798 5 років тому

    Awesome blast!!!

  • @thepleasantpuffin
    @thepleasantpuffin 6 років тому

    How do you feel about Reckless Bushwacker over Ghostfire Blade?

  • @totalcoward
    @totalcoward 6 років тому

    I just had the worlds greatest idea for an Against the Odds. “Pest Tribal”. Not as in cards that have “pest-“ in the name. As in the creature type Pest. You have to run Nuisance Engine and Signal Pest as 4 ofs, and try to make it work.

  • @dominicsevilla1189
    @dominicsevilla1189 6 років тому +10

    Damnit seth i just got 12 bolt XD

  • @benhensley3621
    @benhensley3621 4 роки тому

    I wonder if Thoughtcast could fit in the deck

  • @clintonwallace3881
    @clintonwallace3881 6 років тому

    Against the jund deck. Get in... You got to get in. Yessss

  • @weaponx8211
    @weaponx8211 6 років тому

    Why not add perilous myr? It dies deal two damage. You can also sac it with shrapnel blast and do 7 damage.

  • @johnferguson8794
    @johnferguson8794 6 років тому +1

    Impressed and it's only 1st game!

  • @Cincinnatijames
    @Cincinnatijames 6 років тому

    I keep forgetting to pick up a set of Bomat Couriers when they are on the down swing.

  • @jv-hk8wj
    @jv-hk8wj 6 років тому

    that deck looks like ... a blast ;D

  • @milkyboy111
    @milkyboy111 6 років тому

    Did you have a blast playing this deck?

  • @Mostly_Harmlss
    @Mostly_Harmlss 6 років тому +7

    Hey Seth
    Did you know...
    That umm,
    The word Mountain has a “t” in it?

  • @cosmotect
    @cosmotect 6 років тому

    I am getting this deck in paper, I mean, artifacts and face wrecking? count me in! Already have more than half the cards :D

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      Sweet!

    • @cosmotect
      @cosmotect 6 років тому

      I had a deck that used generator servant from M15 to put a hasty moltensteel dragon in play by turn three, and then giving it double strike using assault strobe to swing for 20 in the air. The deck was just as hilarious but much less consistent hahah, it was filled with memnites, ornithopters and cranial platings as the filler strategy :)

  • @JeremyDeere
    @JeremyDeere 6 років тому

    That settle G1 was SO projected Seth! Why did you walk right into it?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      It's Modern! Who plays settle ;)

  • @IntegralKing
    @IntegralKing 6 років тому

    Feels like ornithopter doesn't do enough. along the budget theme ... how about frogmite?

  • @dvorak2676
    @dvorak2676 6 років тому

    Seth could one or two ramunap ruins be helpful ? 40:10

  • @lukasdohnal9211
    @lukasdohnal9211 6 років тому

    can we have a non-budget (if it can be upgraded) version stream tonight?

  • @angryponcho
    @angryponcho 6 років тому +1

    BLAST EM

  • @uriahnavarro7904
    @uriahnavarro7904 5 років тому

    I’m confused about the cranial plating, I though it cost 2 black to equip?

    • @Shain3333
      @Shain3333 5 років тому

      Actually, you either equip it for 2 black at instant speed, or for 1 of whatever color at sorcery speed. That means that with three mana total (2 from casting cost) you can surprise hit somebody for 6 more damage than what they expected.

  • @Bradley-jm2ou
    @Bradley-jm2ou Рік тому

    Feeling despair? According to definition?

  • @thib568
    @thib568 6 років тому +1

    I wonder if this is better than kuldotha red goblins?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      I'm not sure, I don't think we've every played Kuldotha Goblins. I'll have to add it to the list!

  • @alexleblanc6364
    @alexleblanc6364 6 років тому

    This is pretty close to a list Affinity For MTG posted not too long ago.

  • @ZackerYGO
    @ZackerYGO 6 років тому

    What would be some upgrades to this deck, but keeping the blast style? I saw on the article steel overseer and some people in the comments are discussing bushwackers and kuldothas but i’m not too sure about those :(

    • @XaviFornells
      @XaviFornells 6 років тому

      I think the best way to improve is make blue splash and add mox opal and ensoul artifact, cutting arcbound worker and ghostfire blade