Hi! I'm an archaeology student and the Eastern Woodlands has been one of my focuses since before I even got into college. I think this is honestly one of the most detailed and well-researched Mississippian history education videos on UA-cam! It goes into a lot more in facts and nuance than most people care to bother. Which is why I really hate to give nitpicks in my thoughts and comments, which there are a lot of but also a lot of stuff I liked as well: - 4:27 You really can't talk about the Mississippians without talking about the Hopewell and their antecedents, but I guess you may have videos on that. There's a lot of cultural continuity that needs going over. - 5:30 We don't know if corn is thanks to the Medieval Warm Period or if the climate phenomenon exactly had an effect in the American Bottom; it could be that a combination of a cold-hardy variety of maize appeared alongside a social revolution that incorporated it. We do know that pre-800-900 maize in the upper Mississippi has been ruled out recently, though, which is more a confirmation of previous consensus. - 6:24 Ah, classic Pauketat. He does a lot of great and hard empirical work, but he's also known to throw stuff like that out there, without necessarily any evidence, just to get people thinking. - 7:15 Good mentioning on the reorganizing of Cahokia. It was a really big deal. - 7:25 It's probably worth clarifying mounds were not initially covered in grass. Mississippian mounds had an outer layer of brightly colored clay to seal the whole structure from moisture. Although only a few Cahokian mounds were excavated with this part of the stratigraphy recorded in detail, it's probably the case here too (and some mounds were given a cap of black clay, presumably to render it decommissioned). - 8:22 Which _also_ doesn't necessarily exist, something else that's fun to point out to people. There was a Tula (which is also confounded by Nahuas calling every big important city a "Tollan") and it was very likely an important regional center in the Valley of Mexico, but the older narratives of a massive Mexico-spanning empire are very much overblown and cultural similarities are better explained by the interconnected intercultural movements and cultural revolution(s) spurred by Epiclassic migrations, resulting in what Mesoamericanists now dub the International style. This actually has origins _before_ Tula's construction. - 9:17 Is that a Cahokia and the Hinterlands reference? ;) - 12:55 Nuanced takes on symbolism, nice. - 13:40 Also citing Tim Pauketat, PBS' Cities in the Sky documentary said Cahokia's city grid is aligned to both the solstices and the lunar standstills which form the alignment points. But I don't know which one of Pauketat's works they're drawing from. - 15:52 Yeah there's actually a lot of debate on how many terraces Monks' Mound originally had. What is agreed on is that it used to be one single pyramidal platform and then was buttressed with at least one additional platform (the First Terrace). Support for the Second Terrace being a real thing, at least after a potential initial slump, was confirmed by the presence of clay half-sphere bulkheads providing strengthening support. The Fourth Terrace, however, did not seem to exist at the same time as the Major Structure (the uncreatively named big building on top that seems to be neither temple nor house). Instead, it was constructed after the Major Structure was demolished and a new, smaller building that more clearly seems to be a temple/charnel house was put up. There's also a few other odd buildings occupying the northern half of the summit alongside Major Structure, but the southern half is actually still mostly unexcavated even though that's where Nelson Reed thinks that's where the actual ruler(s)' house(s) could have been. - 16:34 Monks' Mound and other mounds start out as a large core filled with the readily available "gumbo clay" of the riverbeds of the American Bottom; it's everywhere, but it also has a very bad problem with keeping its shape, expanding when wet and contracting when dry. This isn't usually good for a foundation, but it works just fine if the moisture can be controlled. The core can be covered in layers of silt, sand, gravel and other forms of clay to drain the excess moisture and also keep too much from drying out. The baseline moisture level can then be determined largely through the water table but with added layers of stability for short-term changes. For some mounds, including parts of MM, clay or silty-clay can be used to create form-holding bulkheads for the inclusion of other fill. Then there are the added layers of brightly colored clay whose reasons aren't completely known; they could represent different stages or fill some cosmological purpose. And the outer layers of mounds weren't even basketfuls at all, rather entire "blocks" of cut sod, placed turf-side down to allow the root systems to grip onto the upper layers. This step provided an immense amount of shape retention and for steep surfaces to be built. After that, a veneer of visually appealing clay can be applied. - 17:05 This is an unfair assumption. Mounds in general are meant to undergo maintenance in their active life as part of a purpose-built social institution, but after abandonment can still retain their form a lot longer than many European earthworks. After Cahokia was abandoned, trees and shrubs began growing on its surface and the root systems overturned most of the earlier stabilizing structures. But they, in turn, kept the mound mostly intact throughout time. The significant majority of the slumping and degradation occurred after the 50s, when the trees were removed and the water table lowered due to all the well digging happening in St. Louis. Without access to groundwater, MM's gumbo clay core shrunk. With grass in place of trees digging their roots in and all previous waterproofing structures gone, the mound was also vulnerable to outside moisture. So when bad storms started to come MM filled right back up and started shaking apart. - 17:22 Sometimes I forget that barrow/borrow is one of those regional things. - 24:05 The existence of this sheer quantity of shell beads is also how we know professional craft specialization at Cahokia may well have been a thing. It takes five hours to drill ONE marine shell bead, and the flint microdrill bits have to be replaced every 15 minutes. About 153,710 person-hours of work were put into their production. - 24:31 Here the contexts of the Mound 72 burials are being mixed up. While I understand the need for a quick summary, the way it's worded jumbles the burials together meanwhile each of their unique situations are vastly different and important in their own parts. - 25:10 "Sacrifice" is something that's easy to apply to ancient American contexts with little discretion. In this case, many of the upper layer burials may well have been some form of retainer sacrifice as seen with the Natchez (or Mesopotamia for that matter). But as for the hundreds of people below those burials who don't seem to have been given any respect in death, Tim Pauketat believes they actually represent a much more political-based execution. - 25:38 That's only true of the smaller portion of the honored dead at the various features, but the ones violently killed below them were ALL local and probably represented members of some kind of distinct community within Cahokia. Hence Pauketat's interpretation of some kind of potential revolution, especially since it coincided with the reconstruction of Cahokia. - 28:52 yay for mentioning the continuance of EAC crops :) - 29:45 Wattle and daub is also found all around the world. Those old medieval-ish timber frame houses in Europe are basically the same concept. - 29:52 omg, going into the house shapes 😩I think a lot of sources think the T-shaped buildings had an elite context to them, coinciding with ethnographic reports, and there are also L-shaped buildings which may have been for storage. The Mound 34 copper workshop at Cahokia also had an irregular shape. - 35:25 Ayy this is a pretty good goods overview, but it leaves out one of the most commonly exchanged items in the Middle Mississippian sphere: hoe blades, made from Mill Creek chert! Chert from Mill Creek had the advantages of being incredibly strong and durable, albeit needing more skill to work. The nature of Mill Creek's relation to Cahokia is frequently debated but there is a chance Cahokia was directly controlling or commissioning Mill Creek for production. - 37:30 One of the arguments for Aztalan being a Cahokian outpost is its prime location as a collection and distribution center for both perishable and non-perishable goods. Other places like the Rockland site are also thought to have served this purpose. - 41:19 good recent research on deforestation; in hindsight it is a lot to assume a society born into millennia of forest management would forget how to sustainably harvest wood, and that this would affect them more than other societies in similar situations And lastly (in the next comment)...
- 43:30 Sounds like you weren't looking hard enough! Osage has a lot of peculiar callbacks to the older Eastern Woodlands cultural and physical landscape. This includes an origin story where they all lived in one large village by a river, which interestingly did flood in this story and the survivors retreating to "hills". That was originally thought to refer to the flood at Cahokia back when archaeologists thought there was one. The unrelated Ho-Chunk also have an interesting story that seems to reflect a time when their society was more stratified, any many people in the Southeast also preserve a time of mounds in their oral tradition. But if you consider that the Arthurian legends reflect the contemporary material culture of the storytellers a lot more than pre-Anglo-Saxon England, it makes more sense that not all stories precisely reflect the kind of history we're looking for. In fact, a lot of stories and histories about the storyteller's contemporary culture, all around the world, don't immediately reflect the facets of civilization an archaeologist or historian would look for or talk about. Which is why so many of them have a kind of timeless feel.
This is fantastic feedback! I really appreciate it when people who are much more knowledgeable than me weigh in on this stuff and provide honest criticism. Thank you!
I grew up near the mound and the left terrace was fine for years until they did a dig in the early 80's and it eroded after that due to them not putting it back together correctly.
the only thing I care about is that these "facts" of which you speak are about HUMAN BEINGS that occupied this land for millenia prior to the Europeans who raped and pillaged and STOLE from our ancestors.. I'm indigenous.. from the Pueblos of what is now known as New Mexico 🇲🇽 it's offensive to hear WYPEPO speaking about OUR culture and historic/sacred sites as fodder WE EXISTED and some of us still do!! my maternal grandfather was 100%!!! y'all "discovered" NOTHING!! you obliterated whole nations of people and now you're pontificating about your "discoveries" as IF the trauma of the past never existed.. WE ARE HUMANS AND WE'RE STILL HERE FFS!! wow!!!
@@Slashplite They are. OP said “one of the only.” Not “the only.” The United States has 11 cultural heritage sites. For comparison, Mexico has 27. EDIT for clarification: There are 24 sites in total in the US. 11 are cultural sites. 12 are natural sites. 1 is a mixed site (Papahānaumokuākea).
I grew up close to the mounds. The Cahokia Mounds are a special place and should be treated as such. This mound complex is one of the last we have in the area after the settlers destroyed the others. It's worth studying and preserving.
I also grew up in the area. Literally RIGHT down the road in State Park. I worked at a commercial construction company & asphalt plant that is right next to Monks Mound and the Woodhenge sun circle. I used walk over there to have lunch several times a week
I’m originally from Southwestern Illinois. Years ago one of my aunts found a book in her basement from the 1920s about Cahokia. It contains detailed photos and maps. She gave it to me because of my interest in that area and archaeology.
I own copies of 1828 American Antiquities and Discoveries in The West", Josiah Priest. Lots on Mound Builders, fold out map of Cahokia, so called Hebrew influence, Tartar influence, so called writing, alphabets...... many errors but interesting in showing how people were trying to explain many odd findings..
Cool how the biggest ancient city in the U.S. was near St. Louis. This country had a whole history before Columbus that we rarely heard about in school.
I just saw that there were 62 million here before Columbus. There is more to the story, and why was the year 1890 called the last generation. Something is not right, It seems that there are too many cities that have a so-called underground city. Which were inhabitants. Seattle built their city on two-story below the ground, and what about the orphan trains. If they are lying now you know they are always lying.
@@JohnBrownsBody I was going to get a degree in Archaeology. I live in the Ohio valley where 100 years ago there were Mounds everywhere, but not now After finding out it's all clocks and mirrors after I was told what I had to do to make it, I got a Job on the Railroad which didn't end my dream. Where are the Giant's bones? Where in the 50s they were dumped in the Gulf of Mexico, Where did over 62 million inhabitants disappear? One state to look at is Nebraska, In the late 1800s. Here is a question where did all those Insane asylums come from? when its population was low., and most were living in sod houses Why do most states have these buildings, why are there so many cities raising their streets one to twos. stories. look at Seattle, the Annanaika and Mud fossil university, the Mud-flood, and the Orphan Trains would be my first start.
@@JohnBrownsBody Cornelius is talking about the history you were never taught. It's not just Seattle that was built on ruins but most major cities in the US. It's truly mind boggling what we've been lied to about. When it comes to this subject my favorite channel is Jon Levi's channel. This topic isn't new. There are many who have been looking into our history and it's narrative for almost ten years. Some maybe longer. If you look up Jon Levi's channel and watch a few videos with an open mind. It will be hard for you to deny we've been lied to on a massive scale.
@@shealdedmon7027 I don't want you to dismiss me off the bat as someone who isn't openminded... but c'mon man really? I watched a number of his videos and every single one overtly claims there is a shadowy conspiracy and "they" (never actually states who) are evil and want to hide true history (with no stated reason or goal) and that he is a righteous truthseeker bringing true history to the masses. This is pretty classic New Age style conspiracymongering. One of the jumble of theories he is pushing is Tartaria, which has been pretty thoroughly dismantled by people who study this stuff for a living. He cites no sources or research to back up anything besides googling things and using maps during his videos. He pumps out a lot of videos all with very vague ideas of what history is being suppressed, and doesn't seem to be making very many positive claims other than real history has been falsified by a massive conspiracy. Who stands to gain from engaging in a wide-reaching conspiracy not only to erase the history of an advanced precivilization via not only books, but physical monuments and falsified archaeological and archival evidence/ This would require an incredible amount of work to do for literally no good reason whatsoever. Linguistic evidence doesn't even line up with anything he is saying, which is something you literally cannot fake unless you go around teaching people fake languages and murdering everyone with a linguistic link to the 'wiped' civilization. Once again, I don't want to come at you in a seemingly hostile way because these conspiratorial ideas that this channel is pushing have a tendency to instill feelings of 'being enlightened about true history' in their followers who then turn around and ignore anyone who isn't 'in on it', but this stuff just isn't supported by anything other than a UA-cam channel with very flimsy evidence. Hope you keep watching Ancient Americas and other very informative and facts based channels, and try and steer clear of these channels that intimate that there is a global shadowy conspiracy to falsify true history. Because that stuff is almost always just dudes trying to get attention.
The history of North American pre-Columbian Indians has been grossly understated. I've always known natives inhabited what is now the US and Canada, but I thought they were largely nomadic or simply hunter gatherers or at best subsistence farmers in very small communities. To know there were probably millions of people who covered the land in the whole of the area is mind blowing.
@@arkinyte13 my grandpa took me to blue mounds in central Illinois dozens of times. He was a arrow head collector. He gave them the reverence they deserved
Cahokia was one of those semi-local sites that I learned about by complete accident as a teenager and it completely captivated me. I fondly remember speculating about how a massive native empire existed in the heart of the country and the fact that its people seemingly vanished without a trace before any European explorers could explore the area continued to fuel my wild imagination. Certain near the top of my list of places to visit if I ever stumble upon a time machine.
We lived in St. Louis for years. It is absolutely amazing how few people, even local people, know much about Cahokia. GO SEE IT if you are ever in the area. It is just astoundingly interesting. Years ago, before the fabulous museum that is now there, my young family visited Cahokia on a blistering hot day in July (July in St. Louis is just miserable) and we entered a small reconstructed Cahokian dwelling house. Cahokian houses are dug into the ground a few feet. It was cool, pleasant. I knew then that those people were geniuses. The more I learn about Cahokia the more I want to know.
That was a common construction technique of the time, many rural houses in europe were "hovels" and were usually a couple feet in the ground. It helps keep you cooler in summer and warmer in winter and it's a better insulation then waddle and daub and made the homes a bit more fire resistant
@@williamcollins4082 I live in Illinois and stopped by during a road trip. It’s worth checking out and mound is huge! I wished I could check out the museum but it was closed.
@@aryanprivilege9651 actually my profile picture is a cartoon chibi version of Arthas from Warcraft 3 but now that you mention it the pic does look alot like a castle or tower and now I cant unsee ot
Unfortunately we still haven't learned our lesson because a mound in Fenton missouri was destroyed to build a Walmart not that long ago so for everyone out there who loves this stuff need to realize we must also fight for it on behalf of native Americans and there contribution to the human story
@@wendycrawford1792 there is a mississippian site around my families land that we have kept secret for over 30 years, I made a video showing it on my channel for a missouria tribe historian
Great video. Being British I haven’t been taught much pre Colombian American history and thus was pleasantly surprised to learn about the amazing developments occurring. While aware of great civilisations in central and South America I was unaware of any major cities in the north and was thus amazed and astounded to learn about this great city. It’s great learning how much you do not know and having the chance to explore so much.
I grew up in the USA and even we didn't learn about this stuff. They really didn't teach much about anything pre Native Americans and even then, most of it was about post Columbus interactions with Native Americans... my whole life I assumed that's all there was here after the damn dinosaurs. 😂
YESS! I've been waiting to see Cahokia since i started following your channel 8 months ago. I live in St. Louis and that site is undeniably where I got my love for an fascination with Native American cultures as a little kid. Thank you so much!
@@mongofungo9243 You don’t have to teach about every tribe, just big influential ones like Cahokia, Plains, Chaco and Iroquois. Or you can teach about tribes depending on where the school is located.
I don't understand how more people aren't interested in pre-colonial America. It was a completely different place culturally and ecologically. The amount of meaningful information all of us have lost thanks to ignorance, stubbornness, and laziness is absolutely heart-wrenching.
Couldn’t agree more! Because of the Eurocentric curriculum taught in American public schools, most people think the only thing in the US before Christopher Columbus was small bands of hunter-gatherer Indians.
The amount of meaningful information all of us lost... yea... tribes of humans that never developed writing have always been at that disadvantage... as each orator in the oral tradition only tells the stories that give them the best food from the listener... pretend harder friend... stone age wisdom is a myth... if it weren't... poverty would be considered a utopian dream... like the Bushman of the Kalahari
I'm a huge fan of this channel. I would like to add, here in Louisiana there's a mound known as Watson brake. Its actually not far from my house. It's owned by a few different siblings. A few of them want archeological studies done to the mound and one or two doesn't. Well, the Gentry family has always let me and my siblings duck hunt and fish near the mounds off the river. Even though they aren't cleared and there is alot of shrubbery and overgrown foliage you can still see the one mound coming out and towering above the forrest floor stretching up to the height of a few of the pines. The mound is apparently also the oldest mound in North America as well.
You and Mr. Fosaaen dropping Cahokia videos back to back. You spoil us. It's mind boggling to me how little we know. The human sacrificing is such an intriguing mystery. I would bet they were captives from other tribes but all we have is speculation. American history is so underrated and you always put a smile on my face.
They could've been from rival nations however we don't really know for sure. Personally I think they're more likely political enemies or "criminals" however it could just be all of them
Those "wattle and dobb" houses with wall trenches can be found all over the Dutch province of Drenthe. Many people lived in such houses untill the 19th century, because the province was so poor. In the Netherlands, we call them "plaggenhutten".
The most disgusting part of this to me is that, to this day, public schools in the USA do not teach children that these were large civilizations who built cities. They maybe give a cursory paragraph or two that Missipian Native Americans built mounds and the Pueblo Native Culture built houses. They persist in teaching Native Americans were mostly tribal and migratory for their entire history (which was only mostly true of plains tribes and not true for the tribes on the East Coast and Mississipi areas). Glad to find this channel!
I am endlessly fascinated by Mississippian culture, to the point that if there was more easily accessible material on it I would probably be more obsessed with it than Mesoamerica (and yeah, went and ordered that book you recommended right away). The lack of oral history about this haunts me, because it just makes me think about how a *lot* or oral histories were lost post-contact because of disruptions due to displacement and disease (disease especially since the elderly - y'know, the people who tend to keep stories - would've been effected the most). So who know what was lost. Certainly a lot about Mississippian culture in general, if not about Cahokia specifically...
Definitely agree with you. Most Mississippian literature is not really geared towards a wide audience which is a shame because it deserves a bigger audience. If you're hungry for more, the Study of Antiquity and the Middle Ages channel has two great videos on Mississippian culture that I'll link below: ua-cam.com/video/UDP9zHbJKN8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=StudyofAntiquityandtheMiddleAges ua-cam.com/video/JkxZ_B4yoBE/v-deo.html&ab_channel=StudyofAntiquityandtheMiddleAges Yeah, the loss of knowledge is tragically incalculable. I really wish I could go back in time with a good translator and lots of ink and paper.
The only oral history we have on these sites- at least, the Mississippian sites in the same areas as Cahokia which are contemporaneous with it- says that the Illinois Confederacy (which the actual Cahokia tribe were a part of) joined forces with the ancestors of the Dhegihan Siouan tribes (Quapaw, Osage, Omaha, Kansas & Ponca) & drove them out in a war. We don't know who these people were, or where they went, though. Speculation suggests that they have or had some sort of cultural connection to the Pawnee, but we don't actually know of there is any direct relation, there.
@Mafla Ballesteros Juan David It's not always the most accurate or informative, no, but you can often glean some minor information from it. Besides, this lines up with other oral histories of Siouan & Algonquian people migrating away from the east after the Iroquoian peoples begin aggressively expanding, which we know, due to archaeology, started sometime roughly around 1100 AD. Shawnee oral history seems to be the one I can't get much of anything particularly useful from, other than an admission that the Powhatan should have also claimed descent from the Lenape, just like the Nanticoke & Mohicans. You also get issues like Puebloan & Navajo oral histories contradicting one another & some people in each community being completely under the belief that the misinformation coming from the other side is being made up by white people. I don't even know what to make about that, until we can use newer methods to accurately date Anasazi sites. It's also possible, from what we see there, that the fighting never made it as far as Cahokia itself & the people just surrendered & left without much of a fight after outlying communities were destroyed? The French also got this story from a nation of people which is now virtually extinct- just the Peoria of Oklahoma is all that's left. I don't know what to make of the work that's been done so far, but I'll try to keep an eye on it & see where it goes.
I think the theory of multiple massive tsunamis, caused by ocean strikes of a shattered comet, sweeping across continent from multiple directions, best explains the empty landmass discovered by europeans. Lots of compelling evidence
Been to Cahokia a couple times, I live in the region but still a bit of a drive. Really pretty place. I still remember my dad saying "Maybe they just built up to see something not flat?"
I had a friend who lived in Saskatchewan, he moved away as soon as he could because 'I hated living in a place where you could sit on your porch and watch your dog run away from home for two days.' There is an oppressiveness to flat land that is hard to explain to people who don't live in a place that makes you feel like an ant on dinner plate.
@charlesparr1611 I have driven from Alberta to Ontario a few times. It takes 3 days of driving, and Saskatchewan is definitely the most boring and longest leg. You almost get snowblindness, but it's canola-blindness lol. The Trans Canada Highway is straight the whole way except for a single large S curve and when you get into the town of Swift Current. An extremely mind numbing drive
Growing up in Missouri and having seen the Mississippi in flood many times, I also wonder "wouldn't it be nice to have a dry spot to wait for the water to recede?"
@@charlesparr1611 Funny how where you grew up probably has an effect on one's perception. I like big sky.. I lived in Washington state as an adult and felt Closter phobic like I was being trapped by all those mountains, and roads blocked by them.
I recall visiting the Cahokia mounds site in the 1960's and '70s with my father, who was a professor of anthropology in Chicago. I found it fascinating and so glad I came across this channel!
Praise be! Ancent Americas blesses us with another video! Growing up in Eastern Europe, I've basically learnt that the entire New World was stuck in Stone Age, ranging from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic. Only later, through reading proper literature, did I discover how wrong that image was, along with all the sweeping generalizations found in the textbooks I was fed when young. Cahokia, I think, stands as a perfect example of that. It's one-of-a-kind complex, the remains of a similarily unique culture, and a very advanced one at that.
Considering the location, it is probably not one of a kind...its most likely that mesoamerican influence gave rise to the mounds. They are on the main rivers leading to the gulf of Mexico, very close to the mesoamerican cultures.
Yeah, unfortunately, we learned the same thing in America as kids. If we're lucky, we get to learn a few tidbits about the local native history, but for the most part schools still teach the same "Europeans brought the ignorant savages civilization" myths. The only difference is it's not always painted as a positive--like, we were intruding upon a perfect native eden unspoiled by civilization--but it's fundamentally the same mistake.
To help you further along, many native american cultures were very sociologically sophisticated to the point that it made the newcomers, the colonial europeans, appear very uncivilized. This is because many native peoples preferred to develop their societies/culture rather than their technology. High technological development is not the only indicator of a sophisticated people. Think on that for a bit. Doesn't it seem true that the modern USA proves that high technological development is possible when the society/culture is rather anarchic and random? and before anyone chooses to be offended by that statement, think about how modern, white americans value "rugged individualism"- politically correct terms for anarchic and random.
um, they were Neolithic, meaning using stone tools with no metalworking. You can have a town, or even an empire, and still be neolithic. 20 thousand people is not a "metropolis," by the way. That's a town.
We tried to kill them all. We were paid 20 pounds for women and 40 for men and when the Americans took over it was 2 dollars a day and 25$ per scalp and if you were a civilian you would have gotten paid between 75-200$. This is the very first thing people need to be taught when speaking of native Americans. Look at us all the romanticism and the sick use of their sacred land as tourist attractions.
I’ve listened to everything I can find on Cahokia for the last several years and this is by far the best yet. Absolutely love it and hope that the topics that are called out as possible additional episodes are made in the near future. Hats off, this great work and very valuable to anyone interested in this fascinating subject.
I’m originally from Mississippi the state and I can remember seeing mounds growing up driving down the Natchez Trace and just visiting them while driving around the state. We also used to walk creek beds and find shards of pottery and arrowheads. I still have some of both. The arrowheads are all unique made from different color and types of rocks and all made in different shapes(some shorter and fatter and some longer and skinnier like spear points), and some of the pottery has a simple u shape almost stenciled around the rim. Would love to go back soon and do some more exploring.
I live in Peoria Illinois about two or three hours from Cahokia (depending how fast I’m going lol). Not to many people here know about this enormous cultural sight that’s so close to us. I can not wait to show people this video so it can help them understand how aw inspiring of a structure monks mound is and the culture of Cahokia
I live 40 minutes from St. Louis, drove past there almost every weekend while growing up. Never been there, had really no idea how monumental it is. I’m hoping to get there this year.
I'm sad that I didn't get the notification for this. As a recent anthropology grad who did their final project over Chaokia and the Mississippian culture I would have loved to watched this the day it came out. Well, gonna binge it now here's my late welcome back!
Listening to this description, my instinct is that Cahokia was an extremely powerful imperial capital. Possibly the most powerful empire in North America. So much of the physical description and archeological evidence for a rapid rise of power makes me see many parallels with the rise and fall of Rome, Assyria, and many other great "Old World" empires. It's too bad there are no written records or surviving oral traditions. I'm sure it would be an amazing story!
As a Mexican, I'm profoundly impressed but just as intrigued by this civilization as they seemingly (I know they don't, but it's fascinating the similarity nonetheless!) share some mothifs with the Nahua such as the Ehécatl-Quetzálcoatl Mask and yet, their presence in North America is evident with the links to the Thunderbirds... I'd love to know more about the Thunderbirds since they seem to be just as omnipresent there as the Feathered Serpent across Central America!! OH, also... Is there any kind of relationship between the Cahokia Civilization and the myth of the Ani-Kutani from Cherokee Legends?
@@Mr.Obongo That's an interesting theory, but saying Thunderbirds are the same as Argentavis is kinda preposterous since one is a Mythological Being, while the other was a concrete species that existed in the ancient past... Not to mention Argentavis Fossils have only been found in South America thus far While I certainly agree with some of those theories, such as Greek Cyclops being based-off Elephant Skulls...
Cahokia is Caouquias in French transliteration and Cahuaquias in Aztec Nahuatl is those left behind. Peoria is pronounced Peewalia and the Aztec nahuatl word for beginning or origin is Pehualiztli. And Ilinois Michigamea/Mishikamia/MexicaMaya are in my theory their descended from.
My grandma grew up near there and thought arrowheads were naturally formed because “you just find them in the fields”. Wasn’t until my parents took a knapping class that she realized they’d been made deliberately. (This didn’t imply she thought native people incapable of making them, it was just a conclusion she drew as a kid finding arrowheads wherever she looked that remained unexamined for decades.)
As a geography enthusiast, I'm surprised to learn a geography term from you! It's too bad we don't use "American Bottom," or even "the American Bottoms," more widely. It's cool to think about all the the fertile flood plains the Mississippi affords. I wonder if this area could be fit to be called the "Upper Mississippi Delta," just as the (Lower Inland) Mississippi Delta is confusingly referred to as a delta or "the Delta," even though it is upland from the true delta on the Gulf Coast. Cahokia seems to occupy the sweet spot that Yangzhou or the Inland Niger Delta cities occupy, a geographic area that future trendy anarcho-archaeologists and James Scott and co. might investigate. Brb, reading about chunkey.
Finished the video! It's quite fascinating that water was an issue in this area, which shows how much ingenuity and constant work is required in urban planning instead of taking your natural resources for granted. Also, it would be cool to compare with Mayan peoples that last bit about no local cultures having much to say about this historical moment. What did Mayan peoples have to say about the left behind objects, roads, monuments, and abandoned cities of of earlier periods?
Love learning about ancient cultures the world over and when I tell you when I first found this channel I was curled up watching every video like I was on a Netflix binge
I’m an anthropology major with an emphasis in Native American studies. Excellent content!! Btw, you should consider a future episode on Spiro Mounds, a Caddoan-Mississippian ceremonial complex along the Arkansas River. Also considered the farthest western satellite within the Mississippian ideological sphere (that we know of) I’m from the area, hence the plug.
I really appreciate that this channel takes the time to explain the scientific reasoning behind the archaeological knowledge, be it soil stratification, information from pollen, etc, rather than just making broad statements with the expectation viewers will just accept it as fact. Regarding the general video content the voiceovers, images, editing, and themes are all excellent, and as an Iowan I am a sucker for any video with corn. I've been waiting for a video about Cahokia and Mississippians since I first found this channel. I'm very interested in Medieval History (~500 CE to ~1500 CE) and it always irritates me when I'm discussing this time period with people who claim that North America had no extensive cultures or civilizations like their contemporaries in Central or South America. It's a part of history that is not taught nearly as much as it should be, especially in the United States, and hopefully this video and your channel continues to educate people on these amazing historical groups.
As a native Mississippian, I think the more we explore the early cultures of the native populations of America the better off we are culturally. Keep going! The Cherokee mounds near Natchez, Mississippi, and Fayette Mississippi are extraordinary. You should go examine those as well.
So cool. I visited and climbed Monks Mound on a school field trip in 9th grade back in the mid 70’s. There were no stairs then. Your presentation was much more detailed than the information we learned in school.
I always tell people I talk to about how my ancestors had mega cities and large populations in small areas. Some don’t believe cause all they’ve known is we have been hunter gather’s. Great video as always! Keep up the inspirational work
The problem with claiming that they were "mega cities" and had "large populations in small areas" is that they were "mega" with "large populations" compared to _their_ time; definitely not to our time. Thus, people rightly do not believe that your ancestors built New York City.
@@RonJohn63 well there sure wasn’t a hundred mega cities back in those days. But Tenochtitlán, Machu Pichu, several Mississippi communities and a couple more throughout the lands had close to or well over 1-2 million. Which back in those days was sometimes more than cities in Europe. You would be correct in saying they aren’t so mega nowadays, but even still today a million plus people in a city is crazy.
@@dracomadness792 no they didnt? the largest city in the americas was tenochtitlan and that only had a population of 200,000 and cahokia and many other cities did not compare to that
@@jzjzjzj That’s what we know for certain 100% documented fact. But if you look at the size of the city and area you can clearly tell there were so many more people. I also believe that statistic was recorded after disease was running rampant through these populations. Also keep in mind these are all oral stories. So they will most definitely have a little extra sprinkle of fantasy in them. Maybe the populations of these huge cities were less than a million. But if we still compare that to the city of Tenochtitlán. Maybe 3-4 times larger. There might not be significant proof but if you listen to elders from tribes that lived along the Mississippi River. They always tell tales of large civilizations back in the day.
I recently came across the statement that the Yuchee (or Uche) people claim to be descendants of the builders of Cahokia. The historic Yuchee lived in the western foothills of the Appalachians and definitely had a Mississippian culture. Their language survives, but is not linked to any other known language
Interesting as my mother's family were Yuchi/ Creek originally from SC that intermarried with Scots- Irish settlers and fought for the Revolution and moved down to Ga. after. There are mounds in north Ga too.
Wait, I want to know about Aztalan! Just kidding. Great video! Loved the depth you went into regarding the homes and communities along with the possible reasons for the decline. Had a good time sharing the experience with you!
I wish there were channels like this for ancient cultures outside of America too. I mean there are a lot of good ones but none has the perfect package that this channel offers. Your videos are detailed, concise, with good visuals and graphics and, most importantly, they keep you interested on the topic without overly dramatizing historical facts. Thanks for your amazing work!
Thank you! If you'll permit me, let me give you some recommendations on other channels that do nice deep dives into cultural history: Ancient American History: ua-cam.com/channels/ixq2XFpbRsEGkwyAYzZ4rw.html More Ancient American History: ua-cam.com/users/NathanaelFosaaen Indigenous History and Indigenous Topics: ua-cam.com/users/MalcolmPL African History: ua-cam.com/users/FromNothing More African History: ua-cam.com/channels/12lU5ymIvSpgl8KntDQUQA.html Jewish History: ua-cam.com/users/SamAronow
@@AncientAmericas I grew up in Collinsville, which is primarily on the bluffs that overlook the site, as well as the flat area around the bluffs, which would probably overlap with the former subdivisions of the city. My middle school was right down the road from the site proper.
@@AncientAmericas Collinsville High School has the symbol of the thunderbird warrior found at the site on the side of our school, my middle school was constructed in the shape of a thunderbird, and the mascot for the intermediate school is the thunderbird. What's annoying is that there is a town not too far away called Cahokia that everyone assumes is where the site is located, even though it was built before the excavations began and named after the Cahokian tribe that used to live in the area. My one complaint with the museum, is that while it's informative, it's also outdated, referring to the native inhabitants as Indians. I'm 31 years old, and they have not changed a single thing from when I was a kid.
Thank you for the additional insight. I just returned from a trip to the Mid-West and Cahokia was the first site on my list. Our family use to hold reunions at the park within the mounds. I use to play on Monks Mound. I returned with a greater appreciation for what was underneath my feet. I was elated to see the interpretative center present although one was not when I was a kid. Many of my friends near Cahokia have no idea as to its significance. I hope that our education system recognizes the need to acknowledge this site.
I always get excited when I see one of your new videos ready to watch. All of your videos are informative and entertaining. I really appreciate the effort you put in. The maps, images of artifacts and old pictures are really great for immersion and visual learners. You are on my short list of channels I recommend. Thanks
My friend worked at Cahokia mounds in the archeology department. He said that most of the artifacts were destroyed and before they even started preserving anything a drive in movie theater was built right over the most productive area. There were also 16 mounds in St. Louis but all save one were destroyed
I visited cahokia over this past summer and its really underrated. Theres a good collection of artifacts and informational materials in the visitor center and the tour guide we got was very knowledgeable about the site and we had a good conversation about how extensive the trade routes went where goods from the coast and even OBSIDIAN tools from either mesoamerica or from yellowstone made their way to Cahokia. Definitely recommend more people check it out
Corn or Maize is of Mesoamerican origins domesticated from Teocinti from Southern Mexico. Something making the Mississippian culture possible. I think Aztec Mexica and Quiche Maya are descended from Illinois Michigamea(MexicaMaya). I have videos on my theory on my channel.
American pre-history is so poorly understood because of the establishments vanity. They hold on to this old narrative that America was only peopled around 13,000 years ago when the evidence mounts for an occupation of at least 50,000 possibly 100,000 years BP. Very interesting video, glad that you guys are catching up at last.
Some of that obsidian came all the way from cascades in Oregon near the Bend area there is a huge obsidian flow feild there that the natives collected from and traded it far and wide to make arrowheads.
@@schizomode oh perhaps thats where he said its from and not Yellowstone. (I just remember out west) but still for items to go so far means we really dont give Precolombian trade networks enough credit. Hell just corn itself going from Mexico to New York and The Andes was a feat in itself
Was just speaking with Harry Hubbard today in fact. He’s inSo Illinois finding artifacts and exploring ancient areas and I’m in St Louis exploring mounds and finding artifacts. Many ancient wonders to be found
A very interesting history lesson about the early days of Cahokia. I have lived here (and still do) the better part of my life. I appreciate learning from those who have taken an interest in exploring and researching the beginnings of such a historical rich community. This video is just a start. There is a lot of French history in Cahokia from the 1700's and on. Thank you very much for taking the time to put all these pieces together into a very detailed learning experience.
YES! So happy to hear more and more about Cahokia and the Mississippian Mound Culture. Can't wait to watch this! We took a field trip to Cahokia when we were kids. Pretty awesome.
If you wanna check out an unknown mississippian site I made a video on my channel about one around my families land, some cool rock paintings and 2 caves
Appreciate this video! The book, 1491, about more recent archaeological ideas about North America (North of Mexico) will help most viewers round-out their ideas of who the native inhabitants really were. For one thing, native contentions that they've been around 40,000 years and MORE are finally being recognized. Though the book is ten years old or older by now, it still is a far better account than any that have gone before, I believe. The book doesn't do much about Cahokia as I recall, since it is a large overview of inhabitation spanning thousands of years. There is no doubt, however, that the population was far greater than anyone, other than natives themselves, has ever acknowledged.
Ah yes, I love 1491. The book is starting to show some age but you have to love it for how joyfully it explores ancient american peoples. I do hope someone writes another book of its kind soon with new research.
YES! I've been waiting for you to do an episode on Cahokia! Thank you for giving us a spot light on North American pre-Columbian cities and civilizations
I grew up in Moundville, AL. We were taught that out site was the largest and most important site of the mound building culture. Of course I learned about magnificent Cahokia later in life and was floored by it. Moundville is still an impressive site and I would love for you to do a video on it sometime. I did see one comment below regarding something I have pondered for years but seen no scholarly work on. Even as a kid I thought the mounds at Moundville and the art found there was strikingly similar to Central American culture. I figured they built their pyramids out of dirt and clay because they didn't have access to stone. But is there a solid connection between the cultures? Was there a migration? Trade of ideas? If anyone knows of any solid research to either support of refute a connection please let me know.
That depends on who you ask. Some people think that there's a very good chance of it and others are more critical of a Mesoamerican influence. There are good arguments for both sides.
Great content as always! Previous to finding this channel I wasn't aware there were cities like these north of Mesoamerica. Here where I'm from we are never taught these cultures even existed, when learning about indigenous peoples we learn mostly about Mesoamerica, Andean and local cultures like the Guarani and the Mapuche. Also we ought to appreciate maize, and grain crops in general, more. They are the backbone of civilization!
That was fun to watch I really enjoyed it ,I have been reading up on a huge settlement of Native Americans . The Etzanoa settlement was populated by the Rayados a Wichita sub-tribe lasted around 1500 to 1720, had a population of at least 12,000 located in S. E Kansas. Probably the second largest settlement in North America of Native Americans.
I grew up in Indiana, the Mound builders always interested me, as we have mounds in Indiana and Ohio as well, I think the mounds were a way of protecting the inhabitants from floods..
Grew up here and later the kids and I would go there on Sunday mornings to eat breakfast and fly kites from the large mound. There's a museum there that's a must see.
Great video! I was staying in St Louis for work a number of years ago and drove over to Cahokia one weekend. It was amazing seeing the mounds and learning a bit about the "mound builder" culture in the United States.
And, they taught us in schools nothing about these great American civilizations. Only that the land was bare and right for their "manifest destiny". It's reprehensible that these contributions to the human story and antiquity has been suppressed or destroyed.
I was raised in DuQuoin, Illinois, about an hour from Cahokia, and have been past Cahokia many times, although I have never stopped. Everybody in that area is familiar with Cahokia Downs.
9:04 there are one or two mounds left on the st. Louis side of the mississippi. You can see one right off highway 55 near Chippewa. My family always knew it as sugarloaf mound. There was a house on top of it for many years, but the Osage nation fought a lengthy legal battle to have the house demolished and take ownership of the mound.
The Osage claiming that mound is like me claiming your car. I am an advocate for Native rights, but the Osage didn't build that mound. They took the whole area from the peaceful Caddo. The Caddo probably didn't build it either tho.
A worthwhile way to experience the mounds is during their equinox sunrise observance from wood henge twice a year. I went this past March, and it was very beautiful to watch the sun emerge from where the lower terrace of Monks Mound starts its ascent to the upper terrace. I shot a cool timelapse of the event. Also, it's always great to hear Bill Iseminger talk about the site before the sun rises. They also hold sunrise observances for the solstices, but the display for the equinoxes is more striking.
Love this video. I learned about Cahokia during an archaeology class over a year ago. It's really a shame that so few people even know that these Mississippian cultures ever existed. Hopefully this video will help remedy that.
Thank you for posting this. I’ve actually gotten into arguments and get met with surprise when I’ve talked about pre-Colombian cities in the US. People tend to have a hard time imagining the ancient people here as anything other than loosely connected nomads
Cahokia originally spelled Caouquias transliterated in French. In Aztec Nahuatl cahuaquias means those left behind. In my theory, I think the Aztec Mexica(Mehsheeka) and Quiche Maya are descended from Illinois Michigamea/Mihshikamia/Mexicamaya
I live in stl and they downplay how important Cahokia was/is. We go there on field trips as kids but they don't really get the point across that it's essentially the north American pyramid at giza
You bring your basket of dirt You spread it on the ground You stomp it with your feet And compact it all around You do the Cohokia-Pokia and you build yourself a mound That's what it's all about!
Your series continues to astonish. Thanks to your vids, when I read Wengrow and Graeber's The Dawn of Everything, I was a lot more familiar with, and had more context for, many of the cultures and sites that they discuss in that book. One thing that intrigued me in their book that I'd like to know more about were North American spiritual societies that they said allowed people to find allies in places that they'd never visited - far from home and even among people who didn't speak their language. Their discussion of the great mobility of many Americans is something I'd like to know more about. They say many people travelled very great distances from their places of birth during their lifetimes and that there were gathering places of diverse groups.
Yes, clans crosscut tribes and tribal boundaries. For example, a Bear Clan person from one tribe would be welcomed and not seen as a potential enemy by another tribe. Clan organizations are very well studied throughout North America and are still important aspects of many tribes today.
@@billgreen2348 Yeah thanks. This is what I was trying to say. I guess I'd heard of these clans as a general thing. But before I read the book I knew nothing of the international implications. I feel like it might be fascinating enough for an episode looking into it.
As students in Alton Illinois we went to Cahokia grounds and gardens frequently. On route To other areas, we went there Because the bus driver say traffic has too many problems, so today we visit Cahokia all day. We walked around the mounds in front and around The Cahokia grounds and During rain storms we ran fast as we could to a portico for shelter. There is no trash and is clean Atmosphere there. Many students found arrowheads and made necklace from shoe laces Or jewelry from their own There is much lightning in daylight or when storms pop Into very interesting drenched Rainfalls The night time ( seemed like Moonlight shined upon the Mounds ), with blue sheen colors covering woods in The background Some students say they seen Natives with feathers in clothing and they are hunting And running Many students run away And never want to return there Each group of people may Experience something different
Awesome stuff! I’m a big fan of your work. I find it interesting that trade and commerce are so quickly dismissed as being central to Cahokia’s existence. To me when you look at this site, poverty point, teotihuacan, or Caral Suppe, more than any thing else these places seem to be trade hubs that have relationships with regions far and wide. Why is commerce always ignored in favour of religion as being the catalyst for civilization?
Thank you! Just to clarify, I don't want to give the impression that commerce wasn't important. It definitely was and people went out of their way to way to get goods that they wanted. However, we should keep in mind that trade is always going to happen among populations and that there definitely were goods coming in and going out of Cahokia, just as there were at other smaller contemporary sites. At Cahokia, there's not really any more focus on trade than there was at any other site. What was different about Cahokia is that it was a cultural epicenter and that culture was it's greatest export. That's really what made Cahokia different from its Late Woodland/Early Mississippian contemporaries. It's worth noting that you can probably find people who disagree with that consensus. Does that make more sense?
@@AncientAmericas perfectly sir! I should have been more clear that my contention is with the common narrative and not with your analysis or portrayal. I’m just an enthusiast and IF I had a field of expertise it would be Peruvian archeology. So I don’t know enough about Cahokia to contradict the established understanding. But it seems that in a lot of the earliest sites in the Americas people got together at specific sites to trade. And the social constructions of culture and religion came after, while agriculture helped it scale up. I think about American culture and how it has nothing that makes it better than any other. Yet it is the worlds largest economy, and to participate in that economy an adoption and understanding of that culture is important. I believe it was often the case in ancient times as well. Perhaps not in every case, but often. Cahokia like Caral Suppe likely was a good place to trade in land goods for coastal ones, it’s a common theme in history. Thanks so much for your reply! I really am a big fan!
@@AncientAmericas my family has a mississippian site around our property which is a huge rock bluff with red paintings of stuff including a man with a spear and dog, some kinda dog headed thing and some other stuff that I'd like you to take a look at if you don't mind I made a video showing it on my channel for a missouria tribe historian, we were told my a native American expert at Washington University that it's a shrine to the underwater panther God so that man took a bunch of pictures and I haven't heard anything since then but we were told to keep it's location secret and I'd love any info I could get thank you I love your content
Thanks! I like to mention 3 things: A) there is quite a heated debate going on about the idea of the "vacant quarter" theory. In 2020 this article was published in American Antiquity: "After Cahokia: Indigenous Repopulation and Depopulation of the Horseshoe Lake Watershed AD 1400-1900". It got criticized in 2021 and that got answered some time later. It's extra interesting because in the northeast, iroquoian sites are being redated with enormous consequences... B) a little earlier than this debate was the news that it had all started earlier, that there was something big before Cahokia. Unfortunately, I'm on the wrong computer now so I don't have access to the article. I'll come back to you (although you might have it already) C) a good friend of mine is not an archaeologist but an architect. After visiting Cahokia a few times, she concluded that archeologists, apparently, are very bad at population estimates. Her estimate for the city is a lot higher. I won't get into the details there, but it is true that the original estimate was done ages ago and based on a very tiny part of the place. Also, it is often compared with London at the same time (check Wikipedia for example) in words like "it was even bigger than London at the time!".... But London was tiny, only the famous 1 sq mile. Cahokia was huge compared to that. Huge and thus empty? I don't buy it :) Other ancient American cities "suffer" from the same "tendency" : their populations are always estimated a lot lower than their Eurasian counterparts. That's not a conspiracy, it's a fact. I compared many, many, many studies, from Wari in Peru to Teotihuacan in Mexico and of course Cahokia in the US... It doesn't matter how big they are in size, compared to Eurasian cities they have tiny population densities. Did they? Or are archeologists just terrible at guessing? We all know what happend to the idea of empty Maya cities... But then again, that idea was shared by many, not that long ago... (ps: I want to make clear that I don't believe it has anything to do with racism. If that were the case, then Asian cities would have been downplayed as well. Also, for the most part, the same is true for African cities. Compared to American ones, they are crowded!)
Thank you so much for the feedback! Shoot me the articles if you find them. Regarding the third point, I think archaeologists play it safe when they do these estimates. It also doesn't help that so little of the site and surrounding area has been properly excavated. Those estimates could always change with more examination. Since LIDAR took off in the Maya area, population estimates have been revised upward and we've since learned that that area was much more densely populated than previously thought.
Brilliant presentation of issues. Mainstream archaeology throughout the Americas is very timid about pre Colombian population estimates. Perhaps it is underplayed to in an effort to discount the magnitude of the genocide to follow. Recent discoveries in Cuba and Georgia provide intriguing glimpses into widespread immigration within MesoAmerican culture. Then there is DNA evidence into the genetics of maize suggesting interface of Aztecs with norteamericano agriculture. Lots of work to be done to even out blatant anomalies in the academic timeline
With all do respect to your friend, but an architect has little to actually offer when discussing the topic of ancient urban settlement population density, which isn't measured by "looking around at the scale of the site and making assumptions". Archaeologists make their estimates on numerous factors such as optimal land use, burial remains, housing distribution, ethnographic and documentary accounts of occupation, material records, urban distribution, and so forth. Also, population density =/= population size. Teotihuacan was almost twice as big as Tenochtitlan yet the latter had almost double the population.
@@Rafael_Mena_IllDear sir, thank you for your answer. I unfortunately don' t agree with you. I am an archaeologist and I know how we do our population estimates: in general, unfortunately, very badly. Often simply because of the lack of resources (mostly money). Now although I'm not involved in the research at Cahokia at all, I have read a lot of the reports about it. And not only about Cahokia. I became interested in this topic some 20 years ago, first as a History student in about 1999 when we were dealing with Medieval cities. I found it quite stunning that the archaeological estimations often didn' match the historical records and wondered why. I later specialised in the archaeology, history and linguistics of Indigenous America and stayed interested in this same topic. You're probably aware that, not too long ago, most archaeologists (professional and less professional) were absolutely convinced that the Maya and other Mesoamerican cities weren't actually "true" cities at all. They were empty spaces, built for the gods or for the observation of the stars. Maybe to sacrifice a human here or there. I possess some wonderful old books that explain into very fine detail why this idea had to be true, backed up by a lot of good old archaeological facts. And yet, we now know that nothing of these old ideas has stood the test of time. Of course that has everything to do with us, as archaeologists and historians, having better tools. With new insights, new realisations, new and fresh ideas. Every new generation has these benefits. On top of that we nowadays have the power of the internet, lazers, super fast spread of data, etc... Our field has changed a lot due to super (powerful) computers recently. Just like the general society. And that's, in general, a good thing. The point I wanted to make in my previous post however, is that a lot of ancient sites still suffer from the (bad) old ideas. Simply because we didn't have the tools back then. The good old ideas are great and should only be done away with when new evidence proves them wrong. But the sad fact is that so many bad old ideas are still there, continue to disrupt and hinder the progress we (can) make in understanding these places. Like I said, a lot of the population estimates you continue to read in the literature, were done ages ago, have never been updated. People often don't bother to check them which is logical on the one hand (most projects are small scale, professionals don't spend years at a site anymore and we all suffer from the well known cuts in our fundings), but frustrating on the other hand. About my friend: of course she wasn't and isn't just "looking around at the scale of the site and making assumptions". To be honest, it's a little bit offensive to suggest that without knowing her. She is highly trained and skilled in her profession and actually also knows a lot about archaeology, city planning, the economics involved , etc. I found it quite refreshing to hear someone from a different background, giving her opinion on the matter. I would certainly caution anyone (whatever their area of interest) not to just look, discuss, argue, hear and listen to people from exactly the same field. ps: I doubt there are a lot of people that have visited Cahokia and other Mississipian sites more than she has. She's heavily involved in the many projects by the descendants of the Mississippian sites, people like the Choctaw and Creek who want to relearn how to build towns and cities like Cahokia, Etowa, Moundville, Emerald, etc...
I lived in Collinsville just a few miles from Cahokia and spent most of my free time there hiking around. One of the most interesting places to wander around wondering!
I'm a little surprised that an ambitious project of hydraulic engineering wasn't mentioned here, which might have contributed to Cahokia's decline (referencing Charles Mann's *1491* )...
I alluded to the possible deforestation near the end. The expanded Canteen creek supposedly would have flooded out due to this but the most recent research I had suggested that no such flooding occurred so I didn't go into a lot of detail. It is a very interesting tidbit though!
Extremely well done. Narration and graphics allow clear and concise explanation of the mound configuration and the supporting dating of site development. I recommend this highly to anyone looking for an interesting presentation of the early Mississippian Culture. John Nelson
Great video. I'd love to see one on the mystery behind the origin of the Cusabo people of pre-/post-colonial South Carolina and their relationship to the Guale tribes of Georgia. There is a great amount of disagreement as to whether their origin was in the Caribbean or some North American tribe. In a somewhat similar way, the origin of the slaving tribe, the Westo, is greatly debated, but they are post colonial and I don't know if you cover that. Likewise, I'd like to here something about the Mississippian culture around Cofitachequi and how it fits into the greater Mississippian culture. As I understand, it might have been one of the last functioning towns of this kind around when it was seen by the last European visitor, Henry Woodward, in about 1671.
I've hunted grouse in Florence County, WI for a number of years. Two years ago we hunted further back and there were two low mounds of black stones. All black all very purposeful. Each was rectangular. At first I thought is was for logging from long ago, which would be interesting, or geological, which would be very curious, but then it dawned on me the First Nations may have had something to do with it. Thoughts? PS I grew up about 35 miles from Cahokia. Absolutely amazing and the interpretation center was top notch the last time I was there.
The whole city imitates the Orien Constellation, complete with bow and phallus(mound 72)! Monks mound is the body. I just visited here this summer and I was so excited, but my copilot kept saying "It's just a pile of dirt???" LOL yea! That's why it's so astounding! 🤣
Monks mound is so amazing when you see it in person. It’s the coolest pile of dirt ever. Lol. Did you hear the About the Orion thing from chuck here on UA-cam? That’s where I heard it from and I’ve always wondered if other people thought that too or just chuck. It really looks a lot like Orion.
@@fullmetaljackalope8408 cfapps? Yea! Love his videos. Found a whole set of mounds along the James River in North Dakota as well that are unmarked and all but lost to history. 150 in 40 miles!
Thanks for this. I'll certainly be interested in what you can find about the snake mounds and the Aanishanabe/Ojibwe people. Or anything you might find about the Mi'kmaq, the Iroquois, etc.
@@AncientAmericas Many of the original artifacts from Spiro mounds are located at the Gilcrease Museum in Tulsa and the Woolaroc museum near Bartlesville.
I love your presentations! I know you've mentioned the Plum Bayou Culture of the Late Woodland and the site at "Toltec Mounds" in Arkansas - but I'd love to see you do a full episode on it. Extensive excavations have been done there that have revealed an amazing amount about the lives of these mound-builders.
I was visiting the museum and was lucky enough to have someone giving a presentation on this and showed a film captured with some gizmo that could get aerial shots and show where sites were. It was stunning how huge their civilization was. He said it would probably take hunters 2 to 3 weeks to even get to where game could be had it was so huge.
I appreciate you emphasizing the toltec/aztalan distinction of what is now the US and mesoamerica. Viewers could've easily misunderstood that and came their own conclusions.
I think you definitely bring up a good question about why there is no oral tradition of Cahokia. I think one of the things to discuss about Native American oral tradition is that according to Vine Deloria, oral tradition is not perceived in the way of Western Chronology. While Western History originated in a form chronologically of series of events that leads to present day in Native American Oral History, where it commonly focuses less on the events but more on the effects that happened because of a single event. As with all stories it is mythologized into oral tradition and to Vine Deloria is tied to the land, landmark, or location that the important event happened. To the Sioux the Battle of Little Bighorn is barely event recorded in Sioux history or event in its recorded history because it had little to do with their religion than the White Buffalo Woman because of a great role she played in Sioux culture and religion as well as the Black Hills. This would lead me to speculate that either the descendants lost its oral history due to moving and resettling in other areas of the Mississippi where there was no need for the oral histories of the Cahokia due to the fact, they no longer were related to environment that surrounded Cahokia. Or they deeply mythologized the migration or impact of the society by phrasing as Holy People, evil, etc. Or (and this a very big if) Cahokia more or less had no effect on the religion of the Mississippian people. To further speculate, Cahokia was not mainly a people but a city-state with a priest ruling class over a federation of people who lived at the city. Regardless as a Native American it is always fascinating to hear about cities in Pre-Columbian North America because it really shows how parallel people in the 900AD-1100 AD were close to their European counter parts. And to me it complicates and makes me even more curious on why there was no Grand State Institution in the North American outside of Mexico.
I've actually since had a few indigenous people reach out to me and say that their tribes do have traditions about Cahokia so that statement should probably be qualified. However, it still seems under-remembered and there's still a lot of room for speculation.
Just curious - I assume that anthropologists of the 31st century will look at American Football and surmise that it had very strong religious significance?
Hi! I'm an archaeology student and the Eastern Woodlands has been one of my focuses since before I even got into college. I think this is honestly one of the most detailed and well-researched Mississippian history education videos on UA-cam! It goes into a lot more in facts and nuance than most people care to bother. Which is why I really hate to give nitpicks in my thoughts and comments, which there are a lot of but also a lot of stuff I liked as well:
- 4:27 You really can't talk about the Mississippians without talking about the Hopewell and their antecedents, but I guess you may have videos on that. There's a lot of cultural continuity that needs going over.
- 5:30 We don't know if corn is thanks to the Medieval Warm Period or if the climate phenomenon exactly had an effect in the American Bottom; it could be that a combination of a cold-hardy variety of maize appeared alongside a social revolution that incorporated it. We do know that pre-800-900 maize in the upper Mississippi has been ruled out recently, though, which is more a confirmation of previous consensus.
- 6:24 Ah, classic Pauketat. He does a lot of great and hard empirical work, but he's also known to throw stuff like that out there, without necessarily any evidence, just to get people thinking.
- 7:15 Good mentioning on the reorganizing of Cahokia. It was a really big deal.
- 7:25 It's probably worth clarifying mounds were not initially covered in grass. Mississippian mounds had an outer layer of brightly colored clay to seal the whole structure from moisture. Although only a few Cahokian mounds were excavated with this part of the stratigraphy recorded in detail, it's probably the case here too (and some mounds were given a cap of black clay, presumably to render it decommissioned).
- 8:22 Which _also_ doesn't necessarily exist, something else that's fun to point out to people. There was a Tula (which is also confounded by Nahuas calling every big important city a "Tollan") and it was very likely an important regional center in the Valley of Mexico, but the older narratives of a massive Mexico-spanning empire are very much overblown and cultural similarities are better explained by the interconnected intercultural movements and cultural revolution(s) spurred by Epiclassic migrations, resulting in what Mesoamericanists now dub the International style. This actually has origins _before_ Tula's construction.
- 9:17 Is that a Cahokia and the Hinterlands reference? ;)
- 12:55 Nuanced takes on symbolism, nice.
- 13:40 Also citing Tim Pauketat, PBS' Cities in the Sky documentary said Cahokia's city grid is aligned to both the solstices and the lunar standstills which form the alignment points. But I don't know which one of Pauketat's works they're drawing from.
- 15:52 Yeah there's actually a lot of debate on how many terraces Monks' Mound originally had. What is agreed on is that it used to be one single pyramidal platform and then was buttressed with at least one additional platform (the First Terrace). Support for the Second Terrace being a real thing, at least after a potential initial slump, was confirmed by the presence of clay half-sphere bulkheads providing strengthening support. The Fourth Terrace, however, did not seem to exist at the same time as the Major Structure (the uncreatively named big building on top that seems to be neither temple nor house). Instead, it was constructed after the Major Structure was demolished and a new, smaller building that more clearly seems to be a temple/charnel house was put up. There's also a few other odd buildings occupying the northern half of the summit alongside Major Structure, but the southern half is actually still mostly unexcavated even though that's where Nelson Reed thinks that's where the actual ruler(s)' house(s) could have been.
- 16:34 Monks' Mound and other mounds start out as a large core filled with the readily available "gumbo clay" of the riverbeds of the American Bottom; it's everywhere, but it also has a very bad problem with keeping its shape, expanding when wet and contracting when dry. This isn't usually good for a foundation, but it works just fine if the moisture can be controlled. The core can be covered in layers of silt, sand, gravel and other forms of clay to drain the excess moisture and also keep too much from drying out. The baseline moisture level can then be determined largely through the water table but with added layers of stability for short-term changes. For some mounds, including parts of MM, clay or silty-clay can be used to create form-holding bulkheads for the inclusion of other fill. Then there are the added layers of brightly colored clay whose reasons aren't completely known; they could represent different stages or fill some cosmological purpose.
And the outer layers of mounds weren't even basketfuls at all, rather entire "blocks" of cut sod, placed turf-side down to allow the root systems to grip onto the upper layers. This step provided an immense amount of shape retention and for steep surfaces to be built. After that, a veneer of visually appealing clay can be applied.
- 17:05 This is an unfair assumption. Mounds in general are meant to undergo maintenance in their active life as part of a purpose-built social institution, but after abandonment can still retain their form a lot longer than many European earthworks. After Cahokia was abandoned, trees and shrubs began growing on its surface and the root systems overturned most of the earlier stabilizing structures. But they, in turn, kept the mound mostly intact throughout time.
The significant majority of the slumping and degradation occurred after the 50s, when the trees were removed and the water table lowered due to all the well digging happening in St. Louis. Without access to groundwater, MM's gumbo clay core shrunk. With grass in place of trees digging their roots in and all previous waterproofing structures gone, the mound was also vulnerable to outside moisture. So when bad storms started to come MM filled right back up and started shaking apart.
- 17:22 Sometimes I forget that barrow/borrow is one of those regional things.
- 24:05 The existence of this sheer quantity of shell beads is also how we know professional craft specialization at Cahokia may well have been a thing. It takes five hours to drill ONE marine shell bead, and the flint microdrill bits have to be replaced every 15 minutes. About 153,710 person-hours of work were put into their production.
- 24:31 Here the contexts of the Mound 72 burials are being mixed up. While I understand the need for a quick summary, the way it's worded jumbles the burials together meanwhile each of their unique situations are vastly different and important in their own parts.
- 25:10 "Sacrifice" is something that's easy to apply to ancient American contexts with little discretion. In this case, many of the upper layer burials may well have been some form of retainer sacrifice as seen with the Natchez (or Mesopotamia for that matter). But as for the hundreds of people below those burials who don't seem to have been given any respect in death, Tim Pauketat believes they actually represent a much more political-based execution.
- 25:38 That's only true of the smaller portion of the honored dead at the various features, but the ones violently killed below them were ALL local and probably represented members of some kind of distinct community within Cahokia. Hence Pauketat's interpretation of some kind of potential revolution, especially since it coincided with the reconstruction of Cahokia.
- 28:52 yay for mentioning the continuance of EAC crops :)
- 29:45 Wattle and daub is also found all around the world. Those old medieval-ish timber frame houses in Europe are basically the same concept.
- 29:52 omg, going into the house shapes 😩I think a lot of sources think the T-shaped buildings had an elite context to them, coinciding with ethnographic reports, and there are also L-shaped buildings which may have been for storage. The Mound 34 copper workshop at Cahokia also had an irregular shape.
- 35:25 Ayy this is a pretty good goods overview, but it leaves out one of the most commonly exchanged items in the Middle Mississippian sphere: hoe blades, made from Mill Creek chert! Chert from Mill Creek had the advantages of being incredibly strong and durable, albeit needing more skill to work. The nature of Mill Creek's relation to Cahokia is frequently debated but there is a chance Cahokia was directly controlling or commissioning Mill Creek for production.
- 37:30 One of the arguments for Aztalan being a Cahokian outpost is its prime location as a collection and distribution center for both perishable and non-perishable goods. Other places like the Rockland site are also thought to have served this purpose.
- 41:19 good recent research on deforestation; in hindsight it is a lot to assume a society born into millennia of forest management would forget how to sustainably harvest wood, and that this would affect them more than other societies in similar situations
And lastly (in the next comment)...
- 43:30 Sounds like you weren't looking hard enough! Osage has a lot of peculiar callbacks to the older Eastern Woodlands cultural and physical landscape. This includes an origin story where they all lived in one large village by a river, which interestingly did flood in this story and the survivors retreating to "hills". That was originally thought to refer to the flood at Cahokia back when archaeologists thought there was one. The unrelated Ho-Chunk also have an interesting story that seems to reflect a time when their society was more stratified, any many people in the Southeast also preserve a time of mounds in their oral tradition. But if you consider that the Arthurian legends reflect the contemporary material culture of the storytellers a lot more than pre-Anglo-Saxon England, it makes more sense that not all stories precisely reflect the kind of history we're looking for. In fact, a lot of stories and histories about the storyteller's contemporary culture, all around the world, don't immediately reflect the facets of civilization an archaeologist or historian would look for or talk about. Which is why so many of them have a kind of timeless feel.
This is fantastic feedback! I really appreciate it when people who are much more knowledgeable than me weigh in on this stuff and provide honest criticism. Thank you!
I grew up near the mound and the left terrace was fine for years until they did a dig in the early 80's and it eroded after that due to them not putting it back together correctly.
Get a hobby. Lol jk you know your stuff. Very cool.
the only thing I care about is that these "facts" of which you speak are about HUMAN BEINGS that occupied this land for millenia prior to the Europeans who raped and pillaged and STOLE from our ancestors..
I'm indigenous.. from the Pueblos of what is now known as New Mexico 🇲🇽
it's offensive to hear WYPEPO speaking about OUR culture and historic/sacred sites as fodder
WE EXISTED and some of us still do!! my maternal grandfather was 100%!!!
y'all "discovered" NOTHING!! you obliterated whole nations of people and now you're pontificating about your "discoveries" as IF the trauma of the past never existed..
WE ARE HUMANS AND WE'RE STILL HERE FFS!! wow!!!
It’s one of the only UNESCO World Heritage Sites in the continental US, that’s how important the site is to world history.
And in my home state of IL!! I've had the pleasure of visiting this site a few times
Chaco site and Mesa Verde are not UNESCO?
@@Slashplite They are. OP said “one of the only.” Not “the only.” The United States has 11 cultural heritage sites. For comparison, Mexico has 27.
EDIT for clarification: There are 24 sites in total in the US. 11 are cultural sites. 12 are natural sites. 1 is a mixed site (Papahānaumokuākea).
Because UNESCO is complicit in continuing to hide the evidence of very ancient civilizations in N.America
Not "one of the only" this is an oxymoron! It can be either 'the only one' or one of a specfic number.
it is one of 23 Unesco sites in the USA.
I grew up close to the mounds. The Cahokia Mounds are a special place and should be treated as such. This mound complex is one of the last we have in the area after the settlers destroyed the others. It's worth studying and preserving.
I also grew up in the area. Literally RIGHT down the road in State Park. I worked at a commercial construction company & asphalt plant that is right next to Monks Mound and the Woodhenge sun circle. I used walk over there to have lunch several times a week
I’m originally from Southwestern Illinois. Years ago one of my aunts found a book in her basement from the 1920s about Cahokia. It contains detailed photos and maps. She gave it to me because of my interest in that area and archaeology.
What is the name of the book so I can search it in the library
Can you have the book reprinted at this time or is the book still in print? Name?
Name of the book please?
The name, man! What’s the name of the book!
I own copies of 1828 American Antiquities and Discoveries in The West", Josiah Priest. Lots on Mound Builders, fold out map of Cahokia, so called Hebrew influence, Tartar influence, so called writing, alphabets...... many errors but interesting in showing how people were trying to explain many odd findings..
Cool how the biggest ancient city in the U.S. was near St. Louis. This country had a whole history before Columbus that we rarely heard about in school.
I just saw that there were 62 million here before Columbus. There is more to the story, and why was the year 1890 called the last generation. Something is not right, It seems that there are too many cities that have a so-called underground city. Which were inhabitants. Seattle built their city on two-story below the ground, and what about the orphan trains. If they are lying now you know they are always lying.
@@corneliusdeskins9875 What are you talking about?
@@JohnBrownsBody I was going to get a degree in Archaeology. I live in the Ohio valley where 100 years ago there were Mounds everywhere, but not now After finding out it's all clocks and mirrors after I was told what I had to do to make it, I got a Job on the Railroad which didn't end my dream. Where are the Giant's bones? Where in the 50s they were dumped in the Gulf of Mexico, Where did over 62 million inhabitants disappear? One state to look at is Nebraska, In the late 1800s. Here is a question where did all those Insane asylums come from? when its population was low., and most were living in sod houses Why do most states have these buildings, why are there so many cities raising their streets one to twos. stories. look at Seattle, the Annanaika and Mud fossil university, the Mud-flood, and the Orphan Trains would be my first start.
@@JohnBrownsBody Cornelius is talking about the history you were never taught. It's not just Seattle that was built on ruins but most major cities in the US. It's truly mind boggling what we've been lied to about. When it comes to this subject my favorite channel is Jon Levi's channel. This topic isn't new. There are many who have been looking into our history and it's narrative for almost ten years. Some maybe longer. If you look up Jon Levi's channel and watch a few videos with an open mind. It will be hard for you to deny we've been lied to on a massive scale.
@@shealdedmon7027 I don't want you to dismiss me off the bat as someone who isn't openminded... but c'mon man really? I watched a number of his videos and every single one overtly claims there is a shadowy conspiracy and "they" (never actually states who) are evil and want to hide true history (with no stated reason or goal) and that he is a righteous truthseeker bringing true history to the masses. This is pretty classic New Age style conspiracymongering. One of the jumble of theories he is pushing is Tartaria, which has been pretty thoroughly dismantled by people who study this stuff for a living. He cites no sources or research to back up anything besides googling things and using maps during his videos. He pumps out a lot of videos all with very vague ideas of what history is being suppressed, and doesn't seem to be making very many positive claims other than real history has been falsified by a massive conspiracy.
Who stands to gain from engaging in a wide-reaching conspiracy not only to erase the history of an advanced precivilization via not only books, but physical monuments and falsified archaeological and archival evidence/ This would require an incredible amount of work to do for literally no good reason whatsoever. Linguistic evidence doesn't even line up with anything he is saying, which is something you literally cannot fake unless you go around teaching people fake languages and murdering everyone with a linguistic link to the 'wiped' civilization. Once again, I don't want to come at you in a seemingly hostile way because these conspiratorial ideas that this channel is pushing have a tendency to instill feelings of 'being enlightened about true history' in their followers who then turn around and ignore anyone who isn't 'in on it', but this stuff just isn't supported by anything other than a UA-cam channel with very flimsy evidence.
Hope you keep watching Ancient Americas and other very informative and facts based channels, and try and steer clear of these channels that intimate that there is a global shadowy conspiracy to falsify true history. Because that stuff is almost always just dudes trying to get attention.
The history of North American pre-Columbian Indians has been grossly understated. I've always known natives inhabited what is now the US and Canada, but I thought they were largely nomadic or simply hunter gatherers or at best subsistence farmers in very small communities. To know there were probably millions of people who covered the land in the whole of the area is mind blowing.
Hollywood and the education system really did a number on the minds of America.
That's manifest destiny for ya
@@arkinyte13 right, how many Cowboy and Indian movies showed anything like this
@@noluckduck9096 Zero, all natives lived in teepees according to old boomers.
@@arkinyte13 my grandpa took me to blue mounds in central Illinois dozens of times. He was a arrow head collector. He gave them the reverence they deserved
Cahokia was one of those semi-local sites that I learned about by complete accident as a teenager and it completely captivated me. I fondly remember speculating about how a massive native empire existed in the heart of the country and the fact that its people seemingly vanished without a trace before any European explorers could explore the area continued to fuel my wild imagination. Certain near the top of my list of places to visit if I ever stumble upon a time machine.
We lived in St. Louis for years. It is absolutely amazing how few people, even local people, know much about Cahokia. GO SEE IT if you are ever in the area. It is just astoundingly interesting. Years ago, before the fabulous museum that is now there, my young family visited Cahokia on a blistering hot day in July (July in St. Louis is just miserable) and we entered a small reconstructed Cahokian dwelling house. Cahokian houses are dug into the ground a few feet. It was cool, pleasant. I knew then that those people were geniuses. The more I learn about Cahokia the more I want to know.
What aggervates me is I can never catch them open !!! Only access to that big hill ...
That was a common construction technique of the time, many rural houses in europe were "hovels" and were usually a couple feet in the ground. It helps keep you cooler in summer and warmer in winter and it's a better insulation then waddle and daub and made the homes a bit more fire resistant
@@williamcollins4082 I live in Illinois and stopped by during a road trip. It’s worth checking out and mound is huge! I wished I could check out the museum but it was closed.
not a real great neighborhood. madison county WM is close by, and has some equally impressive mounds too. same goes for that neighborhood.
@@aryanprivilege9651 actually my profile picture is a cartoon chibi version of Arthas from Warcraft 3 but now that you mention it the pic does look alot like a castle or tower and now I cant unsee ot
Unfortunately we still haven't learned our lesson because a mound in Fenton missouri was destroyed to build a Walmart not that long ago so for everyone out there who loves this stuff need to realize we must also fight for it on behalf of native Americans and there contribution to the human story
Missouri mongoose. This is the epitome of man’s greed and stupidity!!!!!
I remember that happening. So sad.
@@wendycrawford1792 there is a mississippian site around my families land that we have kept secret for over 30 years, I made a video showing it on my channel for a missouria tribe historian
What the fuck. This makes me so mad
That's horrible!
Great video. Being British I haven’t been taught much pre Colombian American history and thus was pleasantly surprised to learn about the amazing developments occurring. While aware of great civilisations in central and South America I was unaware of any major cities in the north and was thus amazed and astounded to learn about this great city. It’s great learning how much you do not know and having the chance to explore so much.
Thank you! Don't worry, there's plenty more!
I grew up in the USA and even we didn't learn about this stuff. They really didn't teach much about anything pre Native Americans and even then, most of it was about post Columbus interactions with Native Americans... my whole life I assumed that's all there was here after the damn dinosaurs. 😂
I live in Canada likewise was taught nothing. I hope that "New World "history education in the schools has changed in more recent times.
@@nozzzzy bro, cahokians were native Americans
@nineteenfortyeight6762 Lwt me rephrase that, we only learned about the relationship between native Americans and pilgrims lol.
YESS! I've been waiting to see Cahokia since i started following your channel 8 months ago. I live in St. Louis and that site is undeniably where I got my love for an fascination with Native American cultures as a little kid. Thank you so much!
Thank you! I've been waiting to cover this since I started the channel. It's one of my favorite sites as well.
Same! Going to Cahokia for solstice snd eclipse then to Gus’ pretzels was a highlight of my childhood
St. Louis here too!🙌🏾
It is an underwhelming experience, as the tech was dirt, dirt, and more dirt. There is no art, no inscriptions, just wood and, wait for it, more dirt
@@Bunnicula71 Hi Joe Mama
Unlike today, I find it remarkable that long ago there were civilized people living in Mississippi!
Funny guy. Ignorant but funny.
I feel like Cahokia not being taught in most American history classes is a crime.
Indeed it is.
Can't teach about every tribe in the world in school. That's part of a parent's job
@@mongofungo9243 You don’t have to teach about every tribe, just big influential ones like Cahokia, Plains, Chaco and Iroquois. Or you can teach about tribes depending on where the school is located.
Yes it is
I was taught about it in about the late 80s.
I don't understand how more people aren't interested in pre-colonial America. It was a completely different place culturally and ecologically. The amount of meaningful information all of us have lost thanks to ignorance, stubbornness, and laziness is absolutely heart-wrenching.
You and me both.
@T R Based
Couldn’t agree more! Because of the Eurocentric curriculum taught in American public schools, most people think the only thing in the US before Christopher Columbus was small bands of hunter-gatherer Indians.
The amount of meaningful information all of us lost... yea... tribes of humans that never developed writing have always been at that disadvantage... as each orator in the oral tradition only tells the stories that give them the best food from the listener... pretend harder friend... stone age wisdom is a myth... if it weren't... poverty would be considered a utopian dream... like the Bushman of the Kalahari
@T R jews for hitler?
I'm a huge fan of this channel. I would like to add, here in Louisiana there's a mound known as Watson brake. Its actually not far from my house. It's owned by a few different siblings. A few of them want archeological studies done to the mound and one or two doesn't. Well, the Gentry family has always let me and my siblings duck hunt and fish near the mounds off the river. Even though they aren't cleared and there is alot of shrubbery and overgrown foliage you can still see the one mound coming out and towering above the forrest floor stretching up to the height of a few of the pines. The mound is apparently also the oldest mound in North America as well.
Watson brake is a really fascinating site. I really hope more work can be done on it.
Is this near Marksville in Avoyelles Parish? Thanks!
You and Mr. Fosaaen dropping Cahokia videos back to back. You spoil us. It's mind boggling to me how little we know. The human sacrificing is such an intriguing mystery. I would bet they were captives from other tribes but all we have is speculation. American history is so underrated and you always put a smile on my face.
Thank you!
I swear we didn't coordinate that. It was a complete accident.
@@NathanaelFosaaen I just subbed your channel and it looks super interesting. I bet I like it. Lol
They could've been from rival nations however we don't really know for sure. Personally I think they're more likely political enemies or "criminals" however it could just be all of them
Those "wattle and dobb" houses with wall trenches can be found all over the Dutch province of Drenthe. Many people lived in such houses untill the 19th century, because the province was so poor. In the Netherlands, we call them "plaggenhutten".
We call them Cobb
The most disgusting part of this to me is that, to this day, public schools in the USA do not teach children that these were large civilizations who built cities. They maybe give a cursory paragraph or two that Missipian Native Americans built mounds and the Pueblo Native Culture built houses. They persist in teaching Native Americans were mostly tribal and migratory for their entire history (which was only mostly true of plains tribes and not true for the tribes on the East Coast and Mississipi areas). Glad to find this channel!
Thank you!
We were taught this in the 1970s in Texas
This is all 8th grade history.
They won't teach it because it's black history. Native American people are FOUNDLINGS. These were not primitive areas
@@emotionalfriendone43 I don’t know what school you went to, but I didn’t learn anything like this in 8th hrade
I am endlessly fascinated by Mississippian culture, to the point that if there was more easily accessible material on it I would probably be more obsessed with it than Mesoamerica (and yeah, went and ordered that book you recommended right away).
The lack of oral history about this haunts me, because it just makes me think about how a *lot* or oral histories were lost post-contact because of disruptions due to displacement and disease (disease especially since the elderly - y'know, the people who tend to keep stories - would've been effected the most). So who know what was lost. Certainly a lot about Mississippian culture in general, if not about Cahokia specifically...
Definitely agree with you. Most Mississippian literature is not really geared towards a wide audience which is a shame because it deserves a bigger audience. If you're hungry for more, the Study of Antiquity and the Middle Ages channel has two great videos on Mississippian culture that I'll link below:
ua-cam.com/video/UDP9zHbJKN8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=StudyofAntiquityandtheMiddleAges
ua-cam.com/video/JkxZ_B4yoBE/v-deo.html&ab_channel=StudyofAntiquityandtheMiddleAges
Yeah, the loss of knowledge is tragically incalculable. I really wish I could go back in time with a good translator and lots of ink and paper.
The only oral history we have on these sites- at least, the Mississippian sites in the same areas as Cahokia which are contemporaneous with it- says that the Illinois Confederacy (which the actual Cahokia tribe were a part of) joined forces with the ancestors of the Dhegihan Siouan tribes (Quapaw, Osage, Omaha, Kansas & Ponca) & drove them out in a war. We don't know who these people were, or where they went, though. Speculation suggests that they have or had some sort of cultural connection to the Pawnee, but we don't actually know of there is any direct relation, there.
@Mafla Ballesteros Juan David It's not always the most accurate or informative, no, but you can often glean some minor information from it. Besides, this lines up with other oral histories of Siouan & Algonquian people migrating away from the east after the Iroquoian peoples begin aggressively expanding, which we know, due to archaeology, started sometime roughly around 1100 AD. Shawnee oral history seems to be the one I can't get much of anything particularly useful from, other than an admission that the Powhatan should have also claimed descent from the Lenape, just like the Nanticoke & Mohicans. You also get issues like Puebloan & Navajo oral histories contradicting one another & some people in each community being completely under the belief that the misinformation coming from the other side is being made up by white people. I don't even know what to make about that, until we can use newer methods to accurately date Anasazi sites.
It's also possible, from what we see there, that the fighting never made it as far as Cahokia itself & the people just surrendered & left without much of a fight after outlying communities were destroyed? The French also got this story from a nation of people which is now virtually extinct- just the Peoria of Oklahoma is all that's left. I don't know what to make of the work that's been done so far, but I'll try to keep an eye on it & see where it goes.
I think the theory of multiple massive tsunamis, caused by ocean strikes of a shattered comet, sweeping across continent from multiple directions, best explains the empty landmass discovered by europeans.
Lots of compelling evidence
@@andrewmckeown6786 Must have been pretty selective tsunamis, that they impacted just one continent...
Been to Cahokia a couple times, I live in the region but still a bit of a drive. Really pretty place. I still remember my dad saying "Maybe they just built up to see something not flat?"
Yeah, hills are nice.
I had a friend who lived in Saskatchewan, he moved away as soon as he could because 'I hated living in a place where you could sit on your porch and watch your dog run away from home for two days.'
There is an oppressiveness to flat land that is hard to explain to people who don't live in a place that makes you feel like an ant on dinner plate.
@charlesparr1611 I have driven from Alberta to Ontario a few times. It takes 3 days of driving, and Saskatchewan is definitely the most boring and longest leg. You almost get snowblindness, but it's canola-blindness lol. The Trans Canada Highway is straight the whole way except for a single large S curve and when you get into the town of Swift Current. An extremely mind numbing drive
Growing up in Missouri and having seen the Mississippi in flood many times, I also wonder "wouldn't it be nice to have a dry spot to wait for the water to recede?"
@@charlesparr1611 Funny how where you grew up probably has an effect on one's perception. I like big sky.. I lived in Washington state as an adult and felt Closter phobic like I was being trapped by all those mountains, and roads blocked by them.
I recall visiting the Cahokia mounds site in the 1960's and '70s with my father, who was a professor of anthropology in Chicago. I found it fascinating and so glad I came across this channel!
Praise be! Ancent Americas blesses us with another video!
Growing up in Eastern Europe, I've basically learnt that the entire New World was stuck in Stone Age, ranging from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic. Only later, through reading proper literature, did I discover how wrong that image was, along with all the sweeping generalizations found in the textbooks I was fed when young.
Cahokia, I think, stands as a perfect example of that. It's one-of-a-kind complex, the remains of a similarily unique culture, and a very advanced one at that.
Considering the location, it is probably not one of a kind...its most likely that mesoamerican influence gave rise to the mounds. They are on the main rivers leading to the gulf of Mexico, very close to the mesoamerican cultures.
Yeah, unfortunately, we learned the same thing in America as kids. If we're lucky, we get to learn a few tidbits about the local native history, but for the most part schools still teach the same "Europeans brought the ignorant savages civilization" myths. The only difference is it's not always painted as a positive--like, we were intruding upon a perfect native eden unspoiled by civilization--but it's fundamentally the same mistake.
To help you further along, many native american cultures were very sociologically sophisticated to the point that it made the newcomers, the colonial europeans, appear very uncivilized. This is because many native peoples preferred to develop their societies/culture rather than their technology. High technological development is not the only indicator of a sophisticated people. Think on that for a bit. Doesn't it seem true that the modern USA proves that high technological development is possible when the society/culture is rather anarchic and random? and before anyone chooses to be offended by that statement, think about how modern, white americans value "rugged individualism"- politically correct terms for anarchic and random.
um, they were Neolithic, meaning using stone tools with no metalworking. You can have a town, or even an empire, and still be neolithic. 20 thousand people is not a "metropolis," by the way. That's a town.
We tried to kill them all. We were paid 20 pounds for women and 40 for men and when the Americans took over it was 2 dollars a day and 25$ per scalp and if you were a civilian you would have gotten paid between 75-200$. This is the very first thing people need to be taught when speaking of native Americans. Look at us all the romanticism and the sick use of their sacred land as tourist attractions.
I’ve listened to everything I can find on Cahokia for the last several years and this is by far the best yet.
Absolutely love it and hope that the topics that are called out as possible additional episodes are made in the near future. Hats off, this great work and very valuable to anyone interested in this fascinating subject.
Thank you!
I’m originally from Mississippi the state and I can remember seeing mounds growing up driving down the Natchez Trace and just visiting them while driving around the state. We also used to walk creek beds and find shards of pottery and arrowheads. I still have some of both. The arrowheads are all unique made from different color and types of rocks and all made in different shapes(some shorter and fatter and some longer and skinnier like spear points), and some of the pottery has a simple u shape almost stenciled around the rim. Would love to go back soon and do some more exploring.
I live in Peoria Illinois about two or three hours from Cahokia (depending how fast I’m going lol). Not to many people here know about this enormous cultural sight that’s so close to us. I can not wait to show people this video so it can help them understand how aw inspiring of a structure monks mound is and the culture of Cahokia
Thank you! More people should really know about this.
don't worry, here in the St. Louis area, people don't know about it very well either
I live 40 minutes from St. Louis, drove past there almost every weekend while growing up. Never been there, had really no idea how monumental it is. I’m hoping to get there this year.
Living near Chicago I knew about Cahokia but last October I was going through the area. Wow pictures do not do justice to this site.
@@bravery12329 they really don't. When I traveled down there last year, I'd seen tons of pictures of the site and I was still blown away.
Top-notch job. This is easily the best overview of Cahokia I have seen. Outstanding scholarship and work.
Thank you!
I'm sad that I didn't get the notification for this. As a recent anthropology grad who did their final project over Chaokia and the Mississippian culture I would have loved to watched this the day it came out. Well, gonna binge it now here's my late welcome back!
Listening to this description, my instinct is that Cahokia was an extremely powerful imperial capital. Possibly the most powerful empire in North America. So much of the physical description and archeological evidence for a rapid rise of power makes me see many parallels with the rise and fall of Rome, Assyria, and many other great "Old World" empires.
It's too bad there are no written records or surviving oral traditions. I'm sure it would be an amazing story!
Scroll up and read the bottom of the pinned comment.
As a Mexican, I'm profoundly impressed but just as intrigued by this civilization as they seemingly (I know they don't, but it's fascinating the similarity nonetheless!) share some mothifs with the Nahua such as the Ehécatl-Quetzálcoatl Mask and yet, their presence in North America is evident with the links to the Thunderbirds...
I'd love to know more about the Thunderbirds since they seem to be just as omnipresent there as the Feathered Serpent across Central America!!
OH, also...
Is there any kind of relationship between the Cahokia Civilization and the myth of the Ani-Kutani from Cherokee Legends?
That's a great question for another episode. In regards to Ani-Kutani, I really can't say. That's a better question for a Cherokee.
The scientific name for Thunderbirds is argentavis magnificens. They’re extinct mow. Many of these kinds of legends trace back to mega fauna.
@@Mr.Obongo
That's an interesting theory, but saying Thunderbirds are the same as Argentavis is kinda preposterous since one is a Mythological Being, while the other was a concrete species that existed in the ancient past...
Not to mention Argentavis Fossils have only been found in South America thus far
While I certainly agree with some of those theories, such as Greek Cyclops being based-off Elephant Skulls...
Cahokia is Caouquias in French transliteration and Cahuaquias in Aztec Nahuatl is those left behind. Peoria is pronounced Peewalia and the Aztec nahuatl word for beginning or origin is Pehualiztli. And Ilinois Michigamea/Mishikamia/MexicaMaya are in my theory their descended from.
Por que somos familia estos gringos los Dan mala information ..
I live within 45 minutes of this. The amount of arrow heads and practice targets we find in the local farming fields is pretty impressive!
My grandma grew up near there and thought arrowheads were naturally formed because “you just find them in the fields”. Wasn’t until my parents took a knapping class that she realized they’d been made deliberately.
(This didn’t imply she thought native people incapable of making them, it was just a conclusion she drew as a kid finding arrowheads wherever she looked that remained unexamined for decades.)
As a geography enthusiast, I'm surprised to learn a geography term from you! It's too bad we don't use "American Bottom," or even "the American Bottoms," more widely. It's cool to think about all the the fertile flood plains the Mississippi affords. I wonder if this area could be fit to be called the "Upper Mississippi Delta," just as the (Lower Inland) Mississippi Delta is confusingly referred to as a delta or "the Delta," even though it is upland from the true delta on the Gulf Coast.
Cahokia seems to occupy the sweet spot that Yangzhou or the Inland Niger Delta cities occupy, a geographic area that future trendy anarcho-archaeologists and James Scott and co. might investigate.
Brb, reading about chunkey.
I'm glad I could teach you something! I didn't know about the term either until I started researching this.
Finished the video! It's quite fascinating that water was an issue in this area, which shows how much ingenuity and constant work is required in urban planning instead of taking your natural resources for granted. Also, it would be cool to compare with Mayan peoples that last bit about no local cultures having much to say about this historical moment. What did Mayan peoples have to say about the left behind objects, roads, monuments, and abandoned cities of of earlier periods?
Not far south is Cairo Illinois where the Ohio meets the Mississippi River. The area is called Little Egypt.
Well, Sponge on resides in “Bikini Bottom” play in words :)
Lecture 1: America's Butthole - The Untold History
Love learning about ancient cultures the world over and when I tell you when I first found this channel I was curled up watching every video like I was on a Netflix binge
Thank you!
I’m an anthropology major with an emphasis in Native American studies. Excellent content!! Btw, you should consider a future episode on Spiro Mounds, a Caddoan-Mississippian ceremonial complex along the Arkansas River. Also considered the farthest western satellite within the Mississippian ideological sphere (that we know of) I’m from the area, hence the plug.
Spiro is an incredible site! It's on my list of topics but I have no clue when I'll get to it.
I really appreciate that this channel takes the time to explain the scientific reasoning behind the archaeological knowledge, be it soil stratification, information from pollen, etc, rather than just making broad statements with the expectation viewers will just accept it as fact. Regarding the general video content the voiceovers, images, editing, and themes are all excellent, and as an Iowan I am a sucker for any video with corn.
I've been waiting for a video about Cahokia and Mississippians since I first found this channel. I'm very interested in Medieval History (~500 CE to ~1500 CE) and it always irritates me when I'm discussing this time period with people who claim that North America had no extensive cultures or civilizations like their contemporaries in Central or South America. It's a part of history that is not taught nearly as much as it should be, especially in the United States, and hopefully this video and your channel continues to educate people on these amazing historical groups.
Thank you!
Been waiting for a good Mississippian culture video, and you didnt disappoint. Great as always!
Thank you!
As a native Mississippian, I think the more we explore the early cultures of the native populations of America the better off we are culturally. Keep going! The Cherokee mounds near Natchez, Mississippi, and Fayette Mississippi are extraordinary. You should go examine those as well.
Thank you! Well said!
So cool. I visited and climbed Monks Mound on a school field trip in 9th grade back in the mid 70’s. There were no stairs then. Your presentation was much more detailed than the information we learned in school.
Thank you!
I always tell people I talk to about how my ancestors had mega cities and large populations in small areas. Some don’t believe cause all they’ve known is we have been hunter gather’s. Great video as always! Keep up the inspirational work
Thank you!
The problem with claiming that they were "mega cities" and had "large populations in small areas" is that they were "mega" with "large populations" compared to _their_ time; definitely not to our time. Thus, people rightly do not believe that your ancestors built New York City.
@@RonJohn63 well there sure wasn’t a hundred mega cities back in those days. But Tenochtitlán, Machu Pichu, several Mississippi communities and a couple more throughout the lands had close to or well over 1-2 million. Which back in those days was sometimes more than cities in Europe. You would be correct in saying they aren’t so mega nowadays, but even still today a million plus people in a city is crazy.
@@dracomadness792 no they didnt? the largest city in the americas was tenochtitlan and that only had a population of 200,000 and cahokia and many other cities did not compare to that
@@jzjzjzj That’s what we know for certain 100% documented fact. But if you look at the size of the city and area you can clearly tell there were so many more people. I also believe that statistic was recorded after disease was running rampant through these populations. Also keep in mind these are all oral stories. So they will most definitely have a little extra sprinkle of fantasy in them. Maybe the populations of these huge cities were less than a million. But if we still compare that to the city of Tenochtitlán. Maybe 3-4 times larger. There might not be significant proof but if you listen to elders from tribes that lived along the Mississippi River. They always tell tales of large civilizations back in the day.
Thank you for not just showing one image every 30 minutes and utilizing visuals, earned a like.
You're welcome!
I recently came across the statement that the Yuchee (or Uche) people claim to be descendants of the builders of Cahokia. The historic Yuchee lived in the western foothills of the Appalachians and definitely had a Mississippian culture. Their language survives, but is not linked to any other known language
Interesting. I did not know that.
Interesting,language actually can connect a lot of hidden dots
Interesting as my mother's family were Yuchi/ Creek originally from SC that intermarried with Scots- Irish settlers and fought for the Revolution and moved down to Ga. after. There are mounds in north Ga too.
Wait, I want to know about Aztalan! Just kidding. Great video! Loved the depth you went into regarding the homes and communities along with the possible reasons for the decline. Had a good time sharing the experience with you!
Thank you! It was a really fun day! I'm glad we could meet up.
@@AncientAmericas you’re welcome! I am too! Thank you for the invite!
GO Need More ON The GREAT BIG EARTH OF ANCIENT MAIZE-BOTTOM❣️
Cahokia is a good lesson to modern cities. Some of the things in Cahokia still persists in the cities we have today.
I wish there were channels like this for ancient cultures outside of America too. I mean there are a lot of good ones but none has the perfect package that this channel offers. Your videos are detailed, concise, with good visuals and graphics and, most importantly, they keep you interested on the topic without overly dramatizing historical facts. Thanks for your amazing work!
Thank you! If you'll permit me, let me give you some recommendations on other channels that do nice deep dives into cultural history:
Ancient American History: ua-cam.com/channels/ixq2XFpbRsEGkwyAYzZ4rw.html
More Ancient American History: ua-cam.com/users/NathanaelFosaaen
Indigenous History and Indigenous Topics: ua-cam.com/users/MalcolmPL
African History: ua-cam.com/users/FromNothing
More African History: ua-cam.com/channels/12lU5ymIvSpgl8KntDQUQA.html
Jewish History: ua-cam.com/users/SamAronow
@@AncientAmericas wow thank you! They all look very promising!
@@aditsoma6902 I hope you enjoy them as much as I do.
About the Near Eastern ancient civilizations I can wholeheartedly suggest you History with Cy channel.
@@ziumzium5049 oh yes! Good call!
I grew up right next to Cahokia Mounds, I've been fascinated by them for years. As a kid my grandpa used to sled down Monks Mound during the winter.
Wow! So you lived in the subdivision that used to be in the grand plaza?
@@AncientAmericas I grew up in Collinsville, which is primarily on the bluffs that overlook the site, as well as the flat area around the bluffs, which would probably overlap with the former subdivisions of the city. My middle school was right down the road from the site proper.
@@AncientAmericas My grandfather had an uncle who owned a farm in what is now the national park portion of the site.
@@AncientAmericas Collinsville High School has the symbol of the thunderbird warrior found at the site on the side of our school, my middle school was constructed in the shape of a thunderbird, and the mascot for the intermediate school is the thunderbird. What's annoying is that there is a town not too far away called Cahokia that everyone assumes is where the site is located, even though it was built before the excavations began and named after the Cahokian tribe that used to live in the area. My one complaint with the museum, is that while it's informative, it's also outdated, referring to the native inhabitants as Indians. I'm 31 years old, and they have not changed a single thing from when I was a kid.
@@RAClaus3 that's really interesting! You're actually in luck with that last complaint because the museum is undergoing a renovation this year.
Attended a field trip there in 3-4 grade, really moved me. Have been back many times, my children always liked it. Just a place of wonder and awe.
Thank you for the additional insight. I just returned from a trip to the Mid-West and Cahokia was the first site on my list. Our family use to hold reunions at the park within the mounds. I use to play on Monks Mound. I returned with a greater appreciation for what was underneath my feet. I was elated to see the interpretative center present although one was not when I was a kid. Many of my friends near Cahokia have no idea as to its significance. I hope that our education system recognizes the need to acknowledge this site.
I always get excited when I see one of your new videos ready to watch. All of your videos are informative and entertaining. I really appreciate the effort you put in. The maps, images of artifacts and old pictures are really great for immersion and visual learners. You are on my short list of channels I recommend. Thanks
Thank you! I'm definitely a visual learner as well and I think that it's really important to see the products of these cultures.
My friend worked at Cahokia mounds in the archeology department. He said that most of the artifacts were destroyed and before they even started preserving anything a drive in movie theater was built right over the most productive area. There were also 16 mounds in St. Louis but all save one were destroyed
I visited cahokia over this past summer and its really underrated. Theres a good collection of artifacts and informational materials in the visitor center and the tour guide we got was very knowledgeable about the site and we had a good conversation about how extensive the trade routes went where goods from the coast and even OBSIDIAN tools from either mesoamerica or from yellowstone made their way to Cahokia.
Definitely recommend more people check it out
Corn or Maize is of Mesoamerican origins domesticated from Teocinti from Southern Mexico. Something making the Mississippian culture possible. I think Aztec Mexica and Quiche Maya are descended from Illinois Michigamea(MexicaMaya). I have videos on my theory on my channel.
The small human sculptures in the Cahokia visitor center seem very evocative to me
American pre-history is so poorly understood because of the establishments vanity. They hold on to this old narrative that America was only peopled around 13,000 years ago when the evidence mounts for an occupation of at least 50,000 possibly 100,000 years BP. Very interesting video, glad that you guys are catching up at last.
Some of that obsidian came all the way from cascades in Oregon near the Bend area there is a huge obsidian flow feild there that the natives collected from and traded it far and wide to make arrowheads.
@@schizomode oh perhaps thats where he said its from and not Yellowstone. (I just remember out west) but still for items to go so far means we really dont give Precolombian trade networks enough credit. Hell just corn itself going from Mexico to New York and The Andes was a feat in itself
Was just speaking with Harry Hubbard today in fact. He’s inSo Illinois finding artifacts and exploring ancient areas and I’m in St Louis exploring mounds and finding artifacts. Many ancient wonders to be found
See our channels
A very interesting history lesson about the early days of Cahokia. I have lived here (and still do) the better part of my life. I appreciate learning from those who have taken an interest in exploring and researching the beginnings of such a historical rich community. This video is just a start. There is a lot of French history in Cahokia from the 1700's and on. Thank you very much for taking the time to put all these pieces together into a very detailed learning experience.
Thank you!
YES! So happy to hear more and more about Cahokia and the Mississippian Mound Culture. Can't wait to watch this! We took a field trip to Cahokia when we were kids. Pretty awesome.
Thanks! I first went to Cahokia on a field trip too!
If you wanna check out an unknown mississippian site I made a video on my channel about one around my families land, some cool rock paintings and 2 caves
Thank you for doing what you do. I sadly only really know much about Eurasian history but you doing these videos is helping me with American history
Thanks Venerable Bede! I'm a big fan of your historical work as well!
@@AncientAmericas you better be because my work is totally historically accurate and not unfair to Mercians. They really were that bad.
Appreciate this video! The book, 1491, about more recent archaeological ideas about North America (North of Mexico) will help most viewers round-out their ideas of who the native inhabitants really were. For one thing, native contentions that they've been around 40,000 years and MORE are finally being recognized. Though the book is ten years old or older by now, it still is a far better account than any that have gone before, I believe. The book doesn't do much about Cahokia as I recall, since it is a large overview of inhabitation spanning thousands of years. There is no doubt, however, that the population was far greater than anyone, other than natives themselves, has ever acknowledged.
Ah yes, I love 1491. The book is starting to show some age but you have to love it for how joyfully it explores ancient american peoples. I do hope someone writes another book of its kind soon with new research.
fertile american bottom 🥺🥺🥺
I don't make the names.
@@AncientAmericas literally everyone in the Southeast is like "yeah, sounds right."
Nooooo! Teacher said to stooooop!
Ayo? 🤨
You called?
YES! I've been waiting for you to do an episode on Cahokia! Thank you for giving us a spot light on North American pre-Columbian cities and civilizations
Thank you! I hope it was worth the wait.
I grew up in Moundville, AL. We were taught that out site was the largest and most important site of the mound building culture. Of course I learned about magnificent Cahokia later in life and was floored by it. Moundville is still an impressive site and I would love for you to do a video on it sometime.
I did see one comment below regarding something I have pondered for years but seen no scholarly work on. Even as a kid I thought the mounds at Moundville and the art found there was strikingly similar to Central American culture. I figured they built their pyramids out of dirt and clay because they didn't have access to stone. But is there a solid connection between the cultures? Was there a migration? Trade of ideas? If anyone knows of any solid research to either support of refute a connection please let me know.
That depends on who you ask. Some people think that there's a very good chance of it and others are more critical of a Mesoamerican influence. There are good arguments for both sides.
Same people
Great content as always!
Previous to finding this channel I wasn't aware there were cities like these north of Mesoamerica. Here where I'm from we are never taught these cultures even existed, when learning about indigenous peoples we learn mostly about Mesoamerica, Andean and local cultures like the Guarani and the Mapuche.
Also we ought to appreciate maize, and grain crops in general, more. They are the backbone of civilization!
Thank you! Yes, the world does need to appreciate maize much more than it does.
You couldn't be more right, especially that last part!
@@zeamaiz945 username checks out haha
Genocide thought is learned behaviour.
@@patriciarouse2801 what?
That was fun to watch I really enjoyed it ,I have been reading up on a huge settlement of Native Americans .
The Etzanoa settlement was populated by the Rayados a Wichita sub-tribe lasted around 1500 to 1720, had a population of at least 12,000 located in S. E Kansas. Probably the second largest settlement in North America of Native Americans.
I grew up in Indiana, the Mound builders always interested me, as we have mounds in Indiana and Ohio as well, I think the mounds were a way of protecting the inhabitants from floods..
Grew up here and later the kids and I would go there on Sunday mornings to eat breakfast and fly kites from the large mound. There's a museum there that's a must see.
Finally! This is so underappreciated in NA.
Great video! I was staying in St Louis for work a number of years ago and drove over to Cahokia one weekend. It was amazing seeing the mounds and learning a bit about the "mound builder" culture in the United States.
Thank you!
And, they taught us in schools nothing about these great American civilizations. Only that the land was bare and right for their "manifest destiny". It's reprehensible that these contributions to the human story and antiquity has been suppressed or destroyed.
I was raised in DuQuoin, Illinois, about an hour from Cahokia, and have been past Cahokia many times, although I have never stopped. Everybody in that area is familiar with Cahokia Downs.
I hope that someday, our complete history will be taught.
Thanks
9:04 there are one or two mounds left on the st. Louis side of the mississippi. You can see one right off highway 55 near Chippewa. My family always knew it as sugarloaf mound. There was a house on top of it for many years, but the Osage nation fought a lengthy legal battle to have the house demolished and take ownership of the mound.
My grandmother was born in polaski mounds territory...no one acts like they know much about the tribes there. 1st I hear about the Osage. Thanks
The Osage claiming that mound is like me claiming your car.
I am an advocate for Native rights, but the Osage didn't build that mound.
They took the whole area from the peaceful Caddo.
The Caddo probably didn't build it either tho.
As a half Choctaw we are mound builder's and descended from the Mississippians
A worthwhile way to experience the mounds is during their equinox sunrise observance from wood henge twice a year. I went this past March, and it was very beautiful to watch the sun emerge from where the lower terrace of Monks Mound starts its ascent to the upper terrace. I shot a cool timelapse of the event. Also, it's always great to hear Bill Iseminger talk about the site before the sun rises.
They also hold sunrise observances for the solstices, but the display for the equinoxes is more striking.
I had no idea this place existed until my parents and I literally stumbled onto it while on vacation in St. Louis.
In the immortal words of Bob Ross, that's a happy accident.
Love this video. I learned about Cahokia during an archaeology class over a year ago. It's really a shame that so few people even know that these Mississippian cultures ever existed. Hopefully this video will help remedy that.
Thank you! I hope so too.
What is amazing to me is this history was NEVER taught when I was in school. I am happy to watch and listen and learn. Thank you!
Thank you for posting this. I’ve actually gotten into arguments and get met with surprise when I’ve talked about pre-Colombian cities in the US. People tend to have a hard time imagining the ancient people here as anything other than loosely connected nomads
Cahokia. One of the great tragedies of American archaeology.
Just wait until we get to Spiro. You'll be pulling your hair out when we talk about the site history.
Not sure what you mean by this, but yeah, like AA said, spiro is the real tragedy.
An even bigger one in my biased opinion is the destruction of all but one of the Springwell Mounds in Detroit
What a fascinating presentation. Great narration, informative, interesting and entertaining. Well done.
Cahokia originally spelled Caouquias transliterated in French. In Aztec Nahuatl cahuaquias means those left behind. In my theory, I think the Aztec Mexica(Mehsheeka) and Quiche Maya are descended from Illinois Michigamea/Mihshikamia/Mexicamaya
interesting....
Me too
No you’re not wth are you talking bout you bot
I live in stl and they downplay how important Cahokia was/is. We go there on field trips as kids but they don't really get the point across that it's essentially the north American pyramid at giza
Hearing about these ancient mounds being leveled is horrific and made my gut churn. Things like that should never be allowed to happen again.
Sadly it still happens. Hopefully as more people become aware, we can stop it from happening.
You bring your basket of dirt
You spread it on the ground
You stomp it with your feet
And compact it all around
You do the Cohokia-Pokia and you build yourself a mound
That's what it's all about!
Your series continues to astonish. Thanks to your vids, when I read Wengrow and Graeber's The Dawn of Everything, I was a lot more familiar with, and had more context for, many of the cultures and sites that they discuss in that book.
One thing that intrigued me in their book that I'd like to know more about were North American spiritual societies that they said allowed people to find allies in places that they'd never visited - far from home and even among people who didn't speak their language. Their discussion of the great mobility of many Americans is something I'd like to know more about. They say many people travelled very great distances from their places of birth during their lifetimes and that there were gathering places of diverse groups.
Thank you! That's actually new to me. I'll have to check it out!
Yes, clans crosscut tribes and tribal boundaries. For example, a Bear Clan person from one tribe would be welcomed and not seen as a potential enemy by another tribe. Clan organizations are very well studied throughout North America and are still important aspects of many tribes today.
I meant to say that a Bear Clan member from one tribe would be welcomed by Bear Clan members from other tribes.
@@billgreen2348 Yeah thanks. This is what I was trying to say. I guess I'd heard of these clans as a general thing. But before I read the book I knew nothing of the international implications. I feel like it might be fascinating enough for an episode looking into it.
As students in Alton Illinois we went to Cahokia grounds and gardens frequently. On route
To other areas, we went there
Because the bus driver say traffic has too many problems, so today we visit Cahokia all day.
We walked around the mounds in front and around
The Cahokia grounds and
During rain storms we ran fast as we could to a portico for shelter.
There is no trash and is clean
Atmosphere there.
Many students found arrowheads and made necklace from shoe laces
Or jewelry from their own
There is much lightning in daylight or when storms pop
Into very interesting drenched
Rainfalls
The night time ( seemed like
Moonlight shined upon the
Mounds ), with blue sheen colors covering woods in
The background
Some students say they seen
Natives with feathers in clothing and they are hunting
And running
Many students run away
And never want to return there
Each group of people may
Experience something different
Awesome stuff! I’m a big fan of your work. I find it interesting that trade and commerce are so quickly dismissed as being central to Cahokia’s existence. To me when you look at this site, poverty point, teotihuacan, or Caral Suppe, more than any thing else these places seem to be trade hubs that have relationships with regions far and wide. Why is commerce always ignored in favour of religion as being the catalyst for civilization?
Thank you! Just to clarify, I don't want to give the impression that commerce wasn't important. It definitely was and people went out of their way to way to get goods that they wanted. However, we should keep in mind that trade is always going to happen among populations and that there definitely were goods coming in and going out of Cahokia, just as there were at other smaller contemporary sites. At Cahokia, there's not really any more focus on trade than there was at any other site. What was different about Cahokia is that it was a cultural epicenter and that culture was it's greatest export. That's really what made Cahokia different from its Late Woodland/Early Mississippian contemporaries. It's worth noting that you can probably find people who disagree with that consensus. Does that make more sense?
@@AncientAmericas perfectly sir! I should have been more clear that my contention is with the common narrative and not with your analysis or portrayal. I’m just an enthusiast and IF I had a field of expertise it would be Peruvian archeology. So I don’t know enough about Cahokia to contradict the established understanding. But it seems that in a lot of the earliest sites in the Americas people got together at specific sites to trade. And the social constructions of culture and religion came after, while agriculture helped it scale up. I think about American culture and how it has nothing that makes it better than any other. Yet it is the worlds largest economy, and to participate in that economy an adoption and understanding of that culture is important. I believe it was often the case in ancient times as well. Perhaps not in every case, but often. Cahokia like Caral Suppe likely was a good place to trade in land goods for coastal ones, it’s a common theme in history.
Thanks so much for your reply! I really am a big fan!
@@AncientAmericas my family has a mississippian site around our property which is a huge rock bluff with red paintings of stuff including a man with a spear and dog, some kinda dog headed thing and some other stuff that I'd like you to take a look at if you don't mind I made a video showing it on my channel for a missouria tribe historian, we were told my a native American expert at Washington University that it's a shrine to the underwater panther God so that man took a bunch of pictures and I haven't heard anything since then but we were told to keep it's location secret and I'd love any info I could get thank you I love your content
@@missourimongoose8858 wow I really want to see! Going to find your channel.
@@fullmetaljackalope8408 I wish i knew how to allow comments on those videos lol
Thanks!
I like to mention 3 things:
A) there is quite a heated debate going on about the idea of the "vacant quarter" theory. In 2020 this article was published in American Antiquity: "After Cahokia: Indigenous Repopulation and Depopulation of the Horseshoe Lake Watershed AD 1400-1900". It got criticized in 2021 and that got answered some time later.
It's extra interesting because in the northeast, iroquoian sites are being redated with enormous consequences...
B) a little earlier than this debate was the news that it had all started earlier, that there was something big before Cahokia. Unfortunately, I'm on the wrong computer now so I don't have access to the article. I'll come back to you (although you might have it already)
C) a good friend of mine is not an archaeologist but an architect. After visiting Cahokia a few times, she concluded that archeologists, apparently, are very bad at population estimates. Her estimate for the city is a lot higher. I won't get into the details there, but it is true that the original estimate was done ages ago and based on a very tiny part of the place. Also, it is often compared with London at the same time (check Wikipedia for example) in words like "it was even bigger than London at the time!".... But London was tiny, only the famous 1 sq mile. Cahokia was huge compared to that. Huge and thus empty? I don't buy it :)
Other ancient American cities "suffer" from the same "tendency" : their populations are always estimated a lot lower than their Eurasian counterparts.
That's not a conspiracy, it's a fact. I compared many, many, many studies, from Wari in Peru to Teotihuacan in Mexico and of course Cahokia in the US... It doesn't matter how big they are in size, compared to Eurasian cities they have tiny population densities. Did they? Or are archeologists just terrible at guessing? We all know what happend to the idea of empty Maya cities... But then again, that idea was shared by many, not that long ago...
(ps: I want to make clear that I don't believe it has anything to do with racism. If that were the case, then Asian cities would have been downplayed as well. Also, for the most part, the same is true for African cities. Compared to American ones, they are crowded!)
Thank you so much for the feedback! Shoot me the articles if you find them. Regarding the third point, I think archaeologists play it safe when they do these estimates. It also doesn't help that so little of the site and surrounding area has been properly excavated. Those estimates could always change with more examination. Since LIDAR took off in the Maya area, population estimates have been revised upward and we've since learned that that area was much more densely populated than previously thought.
Brilliant presentation of issues. Mainstream archaeology throughout the Americas is very timid about pre Colombian population estimates. Perhaps it is underplayed to in an effort to discount the magnitude of the genocide to follow. Recent discoveries in Cuba and Georgia provide intriguing glimpses into widespread immigration within MesoAmerican culture. Then there is DNA evidence into the genetics of maize suggesting interface of Aztecs with norteamericano agriculture. Lots of work to be done to even out blatant anomalies in the academic timeline
With all do respect to your friend, but an architect has little to actually offer when discussing the topic of ancient urban settlement population density, which isn't measured by "looking around at the scale of the site and making assumptions".
Archaeologists make their estimates on numerous factors such as optimal land use, burial remains, housing distribution, ethnographic and documentary accounts of occupation, material records, urban distribution, and so forth.
Also, population density =/= population size. Teotihuacan was almost twice as big as Tenochtitlan yet the latter had almost double the population.
@@Rafael_Mena_IllDear sir, thank you for your answer. I unfortunately don' t agree with you. I am an archaeologist and I know how we do our population estimates: in general, unfortunately, very badly. Often simply because of the lack of resources (mostly money).
Now although I'm not involved in the research at Cahokia at all, I have read a lot of the reports about it. And not only about Cahokia. I became interested in this topic some 20 years ago, first as a History student in about 1999 when we were dealing with Medieval cities. I found it quite stunning that the archaeological estimations often didn' match the historical records and wondered why. I later specialised in the archaeology, history and linguistics of Indigenous America and stayed interested in this same topic. You're probably aware that, not too long ago, most archaeologists (professional and less professional) were absolutely convinced that the Maya and other Mesoamerican cities weren't actually "true" cities at all. They were empty spaces, built for the gods or for the observation of the stars. Maybe to sacrifice a human here or there. I possess some wonderful old books that explain into very fine detail why this idea had to be true, backed up by a lot of good old archaeological facts. And yet, we now know that nothing of these old ideas has stood the test of time.
Of course that has everything to do with us, as archaeologists and historians, having better tools. With new insights, new realisations, new and fresh ideas. Every new generation has these benefits. On top of that we nowadays have the power of the internet, lazers, super fast spread of data, etc... Our field has changed a lot due to super (powerful) computers recently. Just like the general society. And that's, in general, a good thing.
The point I wanted to make in my previous post however, is that a lot of ancient sites still suffer from the (bad) old ideas. Simply because we didn't have the tools back then. The good old ideas are great and should only be done away with when new evidence proves them wrong. But the sad fact is that so many bad old ideas are still there, continue to disrupt and hinder the progress we (can) make in understanding these places. Like I said, a lot of the population estimates you continue to read in the literature, were done ages ago, have never been updated. People often don't bother to check them which is logical on the one hand (most projects are small scale, professionals don't spend years at a site anymore and we all suffer from the well known cuts in our fundings), but frustrating on the other hand.
About my friend: of course she wasn't and isn't just "looking around at the scale of the site and making assumptions". To be honest, it's a little bit offensive to suggest that without knowing her. She is highly trained and skilled in her profession and actually also knows a lot about archaeology, city planning, the economics involved , etc.
I found it quite refreshing to hear someone from a different background, giving her opinion on the matter. I would certainly caution anyone (whatever their area of interest) not to just look, discuss, argue, hear and listen to people from exactly the same field.
ps: I doubt there are a lot of people that have visited Cahokia and other Mississipian sites more than she has. She's heavily involved in the many projects by the descendants of the Mississippian sites, people like the Choctaw and Creek who want to relearn how to build towns and cities like Cahokia, Etowa, Moundville, Emerald, etc...
I lived in Collinsville just a few miles from Cahokia and spent most of my free time there hiking around.
One of the most interesting places to wander around wondering!
It's an incredible place.
I live near Pinson Mounds in West Tennessee. They are working on the new archaic site the state has acquired.
I'm a little surprised that an ambitious project of hydraulic engineering wasn't mentioned here, which might have contributed to Cahokia's decline (referencing Charles Mann's *1491* )...
I alluded to the possible deforestation near the end. The expanded Canteen creek supposedly would have flooded out due to this but the most recent research I had suggested that no such flooding occurred so I didn't go into a lot of detail. It is a very interesting tidbit though!
Used to have family reunions near the park at Cohokia, Ill. and visited the mounds. Visit if you get the chance. Amazing construction.
It's a great place!
Extremely well done. Narration and graphics allow clear and concise explanation of the mound configuration and the supporting dating of site development. I recommend this highly to anyone looking for an interesting presentation of the early Mississippian Culture. John Nelson
Thank you!
The museum at Cahokia is excellent and worth a visit.
It's actually in the middle of a renovation so hopefully it'll be even better when they're done.
Great video. I'd love to see one on the mystery behind the origin of the Cusabo people of pre-/post-colonial South Carolina and their relationship to the Guale tribes of Georgia. There is a great amount of disagreement as to whether their origin was in the Caribbean or some North American tribe. In a somewhat similar way, the origin of the slaving tribe, the Westo, is greatly debated, but they are post colonial and I don't know if you cover that. Likewise, I'd like to here something about the Mississippian culture around Cofitachequi and how it fits into the greater Mississippian culture. As I understand, it might have been one of the last functioning towns of this kind around when it was seen by the last European visitor, Henry Woodward, in about 1671.
Thank you!
I've hunted grouse in Florence County, WI for a number of years. Two years ago we hunted further back and there were two low mounds of black stones. All black all very purposeful. Each was rectangular. At first I thought is was for logging from long ago, which would be interesting, or geological, which would be very curious, but then it dawned on me the First Nations may have had something to do with it. Thoughts? PS I grew up about 35 miles from Cahokia. Absolutely amazing and the interpretation center was top notch the last time I was there.
No clue. That's a better question for a local archaeologist.
The whole city imitates the Orien Constellation, complete with bow and phallus(mound 72)! Monks mound is the body. I just visited here this summer and I was so excited, but my copilot kept saying "It's just a pile of dirt???" LOL yea! That's why it's so astounding! 🤣
Monks mound is so amazing when you see it in person. It’s the coolest pile of dirt ever. Lol. Did you hear the About the Orion thing from chuck here on UA-cam? That’s where I heard it from and I’ve always wondered if other people thought that too or just chuck. It really looks a lot like Orion.
@@fullmetaljackalope8408 cfapps? Yea! Love his videos. Found a whole set of mounds along the James River in North Dakota as well that are unmarked and all but lost to history. 150 in 40 miles!
@@austinsontv wow that’s a lot! Amazing they’re still there!
You hear Cfapps died right? Super sad 😞.
@@fullmetaljackalope8408 what? He was so awesome!!!!
@@austinsontv I know! He seemed like a nice guy and I really miss his videos too.
Thanks for this. I'll certainly be interested in what you can find about the snake mounds and the Aanishanabe/Ojibwe people.
Or anything you might find about the Mi'kmaq, the Iroquois, etc.
I’m so fortunate that I went there as a kid, it’s unbelievable to see
You should do a video over Spiro Mounds in Oklahoma. The amount of artifacts recovered from that site is impressive.
Yes! Spiro is on the list but I'd like to see if I can actually visit the site before I do an episode on it.
@@AncientAmericas Many of the original artifacts from Spiro mounds are located at the Gilcrease Museum in Tulsa and the Woolaroc museum near Bartlesville.
I love your presentations! I know you've mentioned the Plum Bayou Culture of the Late Woodland and the site at "Toltec Mounds" in Arkansas - but I'd love to see you do a full episode on it. Extensive excavations have been done there that have revealed an amazing amount about the lives of these mound-builders.
Thank you. Someday, I'd like to cover those topics.
I was visiting the museum and was lucky enough to have someone giving a presentation on this and showed a film captured with some gizmo that could get aerial shots and show where sites were. It was stunning how huge their civilization was. He said it would probably take hunters 2 to 3 weeks to even get to where game could be had it was so huge.
I appreciate you emphasizing the toltec/aztalan distinction of what is now the US and mesoamerica. Viewers could've easily misunderstood that and came their own conclusions.
You're welcome! It's an unfortunate name.
I think you definitely bring up a good question about why there is no oral tradition of Cahokia.
I think one of the things to discuss about Native American oral tradition is that according to Vine Deloria, oral tradition is not perceived in the way of Western Chronology. While Western History originated in a form chronologically of series of events that leads to present day in Native American Oral History, where it commonly focuses less on the events but more on the effects that happened because of a single event. As with all stories it is mythologized into oral tradition and to Vine Deloria is tied to the land, landmark, or location that the important event happened. To the Sioux the Battle of Little Bighorn is barely event recorded in Sioux history or event in its recorded history because it had little to do with their religion than the White Buffalo Woman because of a great role she played in Sioux culture and religion as well as the Black Hills.
This would lead me to speculate that either the descendants lost its oral history due to moving and resettling in other areas of the Mississippi where there was no need for the oral histories of the Cahokia due to the fact, they no longer were related to environment that surrounded Cahokia. Or they deeply mythologized the migration or impact of the society by phrasing as Holy People, evil, etc. Or (and this a very big if) Cahokia more or less had no effect on the religion of the Mississippian people. To further speculate, Cahokia was not mainly a people but a city-state with a priest ruling class over a federation of people who lived at the city.
Regardless as a Native American it is always fascinating to hear about cities in Pre-Columbian North America because it really shows how parallel people in the 900AD-1100 AD were close to their European counter parts. And to me it complicates and makes me even more curious on why there was no Grand State Institution in the North American outside of Mexico.
I've actually since had a few indigenous people reach out to me and say that their tribes do have traditions about Cahokia so that statement should probably be qualified. However, it still seems under-remembered and there's still a lot of room for speculation.
I'm just saying that a collab between you and Cogito is much needed
Just curious - I assume that anthropologists of the 31st century will look at American Football and surmise that it had very strong religious significance?
Oh yeah, they definitely will.