A friend of mine built a Zedruu superfriends deck he after he found out that donating a walker mid attack removed it from combat. He would uptick his powerful walkers and whenever someone threatened to attack or remove them, he would donate to the player worse at the table. This causes so much chaos, it's hilarious.
Blim is more fun if you lean more into the second part of his ability and goad effects. Alot of Blim games the table will make you eat your "you lose the game" cards
I've always loved these sorts of decks. I recently made a Codie deck that I edited art for and custom proxied to be all meme stuff. Most people don't expect to see Codie used as a stax piece.
The videos are finished but not public yet. Releasing them on a weekly schedule rather than dumping everything at once. You may notice other playlists are the same e.g. the "marathon" playlists.
@@AmmiO2 Wow! That is a lot of videos, I'm amazed at the amount of quality content then, 'cause that's a lot of upcoming videos, looking forward to them And if you stick to the weekly I guess I have a video to watch each week for a year and change
@@TheLuckySpades I'd release them more frequently but the "marathon" videos are currently eating up the "daily publishing equity". Sometimes I regret publishing them on a daily schedule and wonder if I shouldn't have "binge" published them but at this point I'll stick to the status quo release schedule.
I would recommend if you going to do deck guides just do CEDH. EDH doesn't have a real meta game because it actually frowns upon competitiveness thus making deckguides fruitless as it would only make someone good enough at a deck to the point where they could no longer play it. After all, feelings would get hurt if they were too 'good'.
People can indeed get reasonably upset if the content of your deck is too powerful, however only idiots get mad over players' skill in deck piloting. That's not representative of absolute majority of EDH players whatsoever.
@@dragonrealms4269 I have always felt like power level is far to arbitrary as it's different from person to person with extremely wide-ranging parameters. This dictomy creates an overlaying game theory where as a few wether intentional or not will skew the perception of power to their benefit. I feel regardless of most true intent that human fallacy is absolute representative of the majority of EDH players. Thus, I believe if you want to be the adult and cut through the supercilious B.S it's better to play CEDH as I know for a fact everyone at that table wants to beat me and I want to beat them. As proof of my case, please consider the following scenario; It's Open EDH night at your local store. Someone you you have never met asks to play with you. They let you know they have played magic, but not edh.They let you know their commander is Lathril, but don't offer much else. Lets say you ask them what the power level of their deck is and they respond well they primarily constructed it from Kaldheim precon and a case of Commander Masters they got. With this information (which is a lot) would you play with them? Or would you want more information?
@@SkyBlade79 You would be surprised how often people get wrong those "thirty" ways to win with Thassa Oracle or completely wiff on an Ad Nas or a Tendril (or not forget how to count with a Gitrog combo). However, more often than not since your sitting at a table of three other people who want to win it is in their best interest to act against your "thirty" ways of winning with Oracle and because they know those play lines as well ultimately you will have to get much more clever.
Both of these deck lists are pretty bad. You take janky commanders and then add thousands of dollars worth of CEDH staples? I get an emphasis on speeding up your wacky strategy, but you took it in a very unrealistic direction that has very little use to anyone. A new or curious players time is much better spent elsewhere, and the comments are full of annoyed experienced players.
For these two you can create them for approximately 50 dollars each, you don't really need those staples. Personally I have Demonic Tutor, Vampiric Tutor an Opposition Agent, and they go to every my black deck because why not. But you can easily play without them. The cards you need for them are so bizarre and rare to play that you will most probably spend no more than 1-2 dollars on each.
A friend of mine built a Zedruu superfriends deck he after he found out that donating a walker mid attack removed it from combat. He would uptick his powerful walkers and whenever someone threatened to attack or remove them, he would donate to the player worse at the table. This causes so much chaos, it's hilarious.
Blim is more fun if you lean more into the second part of his ability and goad effects. Alot of Blim games the table will make you eat your "you lose the game" cards
I've always loved these sorts of decks. I recently made a Codie deck that I edited art for and custom proxied to be all meme stuff. Most people don't expect to see Codie used as a stax piece.
The OG commander from 2011 you were missing is Ghave, Guru of Spores.
I tend to forget that one because it's pretty meh.
@@AmmiO2fair enough
Narset, Enlightened Master (it’s the old one) I would love to see a deck tech on her!
For Treacherous Blessing, won't it get sacrificed when you target it with your donate ability?
It appears I suffered from temporary selective blindness.
Never seen a playlist with 61 hidden videos, how come so much of the EDH guide playlist is hidden?
The videos are finished but not public yet. Releasing them on a weekly schedule rather than dumping everything at once. You may notice other playlists are the same e.g. the "marathon" playlists.
@@AmmiO2 Wow! That is a lot of videos, I'm amazed at the amount of quality content then, 'cause that's a lot of upcoming videos, looking forward to them
And if you stick to the weekly I guess I have a video to watch each week for a year and change
@@TheLuckySpades I'd release them more frequently but the "marathon" videos are currently eating up the "daily publishing equity". Sometimes I regret publishing them on a daily schedule and wonder if I shouldn't have "binge" published them but at this point I'll stick to the status quo release schedule.
Skipped over Jon Irenicus, but he goes into the same category.
Would also love his take on that one. I have built 3 different iterations of that one already.
I would recommend if you going to do deck guides just do CEDH. EDH doesn't have a real meta game because it actually frowns upon competitiveness thus making deckguides fruitless as it would only make someone good enough at a deck to the point where they could no longer play it. After all, feelings would get hurt if they were too 'good'.
People can indeed get reasonably upset if the content of your deck is too powerful, however only idiots get mad over players' skill in deck piloting. That's not representative of absolute majority of EDH players whatsoever.
great way to get "here's how you win with thassas oracle" thirty times
@@dragonrealms4269 I have always felt like power level is far to arbitrary as it's different from person to person with extremely wide-ranging parameters. This dictomy creates an overlaying game theory where as a few wether intentional or not will skew the perception of power to their benefit. I feel regardless of most true intent that human fallacy is absolute representative of the majority of EDH players. Thus, I believe if you want to be the adult and cut through the supercilious B.S it's better to play CEDH as I know for a fact everyone at that table wants to beat me and I want to beat them.
As proof of my case, please consider the following scenario;
It's Open EDH night at your local store. Someone you you have never met asks to play with you. They let you know they have played magic, but not edh.They let you know their commander is Lathril, but don't offer much else. Lets say you ask them what the power level of their deck is and they respond well they primarily constructed it from Kaldheim precon and a case of Commander Masters they got. With this information (which is a lot) would you play with them? Or would you want more information?
@@SkyBlade79 You would be surprised how often people get wrong those "thirty" ways to win with Thassa Oracle or completely wiff on an Ad Nas or a Tendril (or not forget how to count with a Gitrog combo). However, more often than not since your sitting at a table of three other people who want to win it is in their best interest to act against your "thirty" ways of winning with Oracle and because they know those play lines as well ultimately you will have to get much more clever.
Both of these deck lists are pretty bad. You take janky commanders and then add thousands of dollars worth of CEDH staples? I get an emphasis on speeding up your wacky strategy, but you took it in a very unrealistic direction that has very little use to anyone. A new or curious players time is much better spent elsewhere, and the comments are full of annoyed experienced players.
Just proxy
For these two you can create them for approximately 50 dollars each, you don't really need those staples. Personally I have Demonic Tutor, Vampiric Tutor an Opposition Agent, and they go to every my black deck because why not. But you can easily play without them. The cards you need for them are so bizarre and rare to play that you will most probably spend no more than 1-2 dollars on each.