@@glennpeterson1357 I don't have reforger. I play Arma 3 a lot though. The thing that always bothered me was they never put the commander's 240 mounted on top. The best lav in arma 3 is the RHS mod.
@@keithallen2457 Reforger is pretty good these days. Depending what you’re into. I like PVP which I used to play on A3, but, TBH, I’ve not gone back because Reforger Conflict is just too good!
@@Nutter-l3s comes down to being able to use the controls, if your standing on your seat to peak all the way out how your arms reaching the gas’s and wheel
2:27 I completely agree, utilizing the scroll wheel for gradual peaking would be great, they could even just use the existing stance scroll with ctrl + mousewheel
Ah, a fellow nerd. Here’s something neat tho. All 25mm bushmaster chainguns to include the M2 upgrade to the M3 bradly are being swapped to 30mm to accommodate airburst munitions for anti drone and trench warfare
Well the good news is the arsenal has certain weapons and items rank locked, meaning the rpg will not be as accessible as it is now (atleast in the early stages of the match).
Great video Caracal! As usual excellent attention to detail! :) I've been looking forward to the LAV for almost 2 years now! Those pesky BTRs will finally get some comeuppance! :)
will you make a video on the building destruction? i really wanna see what different things will destroy a building and i cant play till next weekend to test myself
@ I’d say it’s been in the game since start of the year maybe? So the commander can get really low down looks almost exactly the same as Brad Pitts stance in fury when he and the other Sherman’s are attacking the tree line. Really low profile but still improved visibility over being button up!
I like to think of the LAV-25 as an M2/M3 Bradley made for US Marines. It's light, amphibious, but still packs enough firepower for those jarheads to take out just about anything short of a Main Battle Tank. The 25mm Bushmaster cannon is the very same as the Bradley's. Not much armor however, so it's relatively balanced.
Hello! I have one comment, the question is not really related to this post. I'm curious why the SVD only has the option of a PSO 1 riflescope with 4x magnification. As far as I've researched on the net, there are other riflescopes for the SVD with higher magnification, but I don't know if they were used during the USSR or later. If we compare them with the M21 and the 3-9x riflescope, the Soviet side is very underpowered. Do you perhaps know something more about riflescopes for the SVD during the USSR? Thanks
The only soviet era SVD scope i can find that isn't either a PSO, A copy of a PSO, or a night vision scope (as night vision hasn't been implemented) is the 1P21, a weird 3-9x scope only adopted at some point in 1989 (the same year the game is set, so it's possible it hadn't been adopted by whatever month the game is in and wouldn'tve been widely fielded). It adjusted zero alongside the magnification, so increasing the magnification also adjusted the elevation. It's in the RHS mod though.
Little bit offtopic. Looks like they trying to go for realistic sounds, including realistic (or better word authentic) dynamic range between quiet sound (steps) and loud (gunshot, explosion) but they made echo/tails are too loud. I remember the sound of 14mm gun when you sitting inside btr-80, you don hear any echo/tail.
Tank and vic crews never fully expose themselves lol, they only ever have their heads out for better view while driving. Its not done in combat for obvious reasons, and i'd imagine the same effect of being killed will apply in AR.
I don't think the commander has his own independent periscope in the lav25 like you would have with other vehicles like the BDRM-2. . If you at the sights they look like an identical copy if what the gunner has, coupled with the same hand controller. Externally the optical port on the commander's side is fixed to the turret, just like gunners. I think the commander simply has the options to take control away from the gunner to control gunner sights if needed. I would expect this to implemented similarly to how pilot/copilot can lock or handoff controls to each other in helicopter, but would instead be applied to the rotation of the turret and use of owns one gunnery optics.
Comment regarding equipment Does anyone know how the equipment is selected. say LAV 25 and BRDM2 LAV 25 in service 1983 main armament M242 Bushmaster 25 mm BRDM2 in service 1962 main armament 14.5 mm KPVT I don't think you should compare these two vehicles based on their characteristics.. It would be more comparable if the USSR side had BMP2 in service 1980 with main armament 30 mm 2A42 In general, I think that the USSR's armament is undernourished, but not from the point of view that the Soviets did not have similar armament to America at that time. I think the ARMA developers have a bit of a biased view of equipment. This is just my opinion What are your opinions?
I think so too. The gear selection appears to favor soviets getting equipment that is 20 years older. I think there are some historical biases, and perhaps also the devs having easy access to a real BTR-70 from somewhere to model it and record the audio. That may explain the presence of a BTR-70, and not a BTR-80. Someone else also told me that most of the advanced soviet weapons on vehicles at this time were tracked vehicles and refrogger has no tracked vehicles. A BMP-1 would be a very powerful vehicle in the current game setting.
Tanks have tracks. Tracked vehicles have their own physics and mechanics they have to implement. The tanks available in 1989 also have things like advanced composite armor, explosive reactive armor kits, thermal and night vision optics, gun/turret stabilization systems, human loader positions for Western tanks and auto loaders for eastern bloc tanks and so on. They aren't a trivial addition and the LAV doesn't progress much us towards tanks mechanics wise.
Because tiny HE rounds (32g of explosive in a M792 HEI-T vs 180g in a M67 frag) and slightly better AP (when 14.5 already pens everything in game) aren't enough to justify adding BMP-1/2.
I think the devs focused on the BTR-70 because they had access to a real one to record the audio from. It would be great if they had a more modern BTR but I think these are harder to get where the developer has their offices.
Lol you cant peak out anymore caus you have to hold the streering controls. Also people peak out their head when driving, i did it all the time in Arma 3 when driving in safe areas or RTB from a mission.
I was a lav crew man from 03-07. Best job i ever had.
yeehaw
Cool! Have you checked out the LAV in game?
@@glennpeterson1357 I don't have reforger. I play Arma 3 a lot though. The thing that always bothered me was they never put the commander's 240 mounted on top. The best lav in arma 3 is the RHS mod.
@@keithallen2457 Reforger is pretty good these days. Depending what you’re into. I like PVP which I used to play on A3, but, TBH, I’ve not gone back because Reforger Conflict is just too good!
Being able to control how high your stick your head up is great idea.
@@Nutter-l3s comes down to being able to use the controls, if your standing on your seat to peak all the way out how your arms reaching the gas’s and wheel
You would not have the hatch open in combat ever. That 25 is gonna rock your dome.
🤣
Your TBI is not service related.
The gun won't actually fire if the hatch is open. There is a inhibitor switch.
2:27 I completely agree, utilizing the scroll wheel for gradual peaking would be great, they could even just use the existing stance scroll with ctrl + mousewheel
very cool! Wish I had arma reforger. Arma 4's gonna be the ULTIMATE military simulator sandbox. So excited
@buggaming5346 we got GTA6 before Arma 4 lol.
Are you a bohemia bot lmao
its a 25mm not a 30mm
Still puts fear into the enemy's eyes😂
Ah, a fellow nerd.
Here’s something neat tho. All 25mm bushmaster chainguns to include the M2 upgrade to the M3 bradly are being swapped to 30mm to accommodate airburst munitions for anti drone and trench warfare
why was I thinking it was 30mm?
@@caracal3892 maybe cause you thought of the BMP-2 ?
@@caracal3892 soviets use 30mm on their IFVs so you probably though the americans do the same
I'm unsure how viable any ground vehicle will be in a game where arming every troop with AT weapons is trivial
Well the good news is the arsenal has certain weapons and items rank locked, meaning the rpg will not be as accessible as it is now (atleast in the early stages of the match).
They made weight more impactful on movement, so not everyone should be running around with RPGs
@smokecrash2147 The weight change is decent but still seems a lot of people are still using similar loadouts
@@StevenSeagul783 this plus weight tweaks will hopefully be helpful to the problem
@@StevenSeagul783I would like to see rockets and suppressors locked behind Sergeant, and grenade launchers under corporal
Great video Caracal! As usual excellent attention to detail! :) I've been looking forward to the LAV for almost 2 years now! Those pesky BTRs will finally get some comeuppance! :)
did not knew we could poke the head out to see, thats cool
also, check the reconnaissance vehicles, there's left and right blinkers
I was an lav25 gunner, and yes you can shoot the LAV 25 main gun and coax from the gunner seat while popped up I did it a few times.
will you make a video on the building destruction? i really wanna see what different things will destroy a building and i cant play till next weekend to test myself
I am uploading a video on building destruction now
@ amazing, love your videos man👍
The devs should watch these. Good constructive feedback!
Thanks!
Are you able to use the binoculars from the hatch?
In squad 44 there’s 2 positions of looking out the hatch. There’s fully standing and hunched which makes you a far more difficult target to hit.
Did they add that recently? I have not played post scriptum for a long time since after they added more detailed tank crew gameplay.
@ I’d say it’s been in the game since start of the year maybe? So the commander can get really low down looks almost exactly the same as Brad Pitts stance in fury when he and the other Sherman’s are attacking the tree line. Really low profile but still improved visibility over being button up!
@@Benjamin-578 Definitely an improvement then, but I'd say Caracal's suggestion of making it incremental for fine adjustments would be best.
I like to think of the LAV-25 as an M2/M3 Bradley made for US Marines. It's light, amphibious, but still packs enough firepower for those jarheads to take out just about anything short of a Main Battle Tank. The 25mm Bushmaster cannon is the very same as the Bradley's. Not much armor however, so it's relatively balanced.
Hello!
I have one comment, the question is not really related to this post.
I'm curious why the SVD only has the option of a PSO 1 riflescope with 4x magnification.
As far as I've researched on the net, there are other riflescopes for the SVD with higher magnification, but I don't know if they were used during the USSR or later.
If we compare them with the M21 and the 3-9x riflescope, the Soviet side is very underpowered.
Do you perhaps know something more about riflescopes for the SVD during the USSR?
Thanks
The only soviet era SVD scope i can find that isn't either a PSO, A copy of a PSO, or a night vision scope (as night vision hasn't been implemented) is the 1P21, a weird 3-9x scope only adopted at some point in 1989 (the same year the game is set, so it's possible it hadn't been adopted by whatever month the game is in and wouldn'tve been widely fielded). It adjusted zero alongside the magnification, so increasing the magnification also adjusted the elevation. It's in the RHS mod though.
PSO is the optic for this game's setting.
Little bit offtopic. Looks like they trying to go for realistic sounds, including realistic (or better word authentic) dynamic range between quiet sound (steps) and loud (gunshot, explosion) but they made echo/tails are too loud. I remember the sound of 14mm gun when you sitting inside btr-80, you don hear any echo/tail.
Using the scrollwheel to raise your head out would feel quite intuitive I guess
does it go in the water?
Yes
did you try ctrl+z to look out of the driver seat?
Tank and vic crews never fully expose themselves lol, they only ever have their heads out for better view while driving. Its not done in combat for obvious reasons, and i'd imagine the same effect of being killed will apply in AR.
i still want them to add the m113 apc for the usa = it makes it fair the the rus have 2 apc's
Lav is getting a 25mm Soviets are stuck with a 14mm
@@PandaGaming-pc2xv they aren't add tracked vehicles
@@PandaGaming-pc2xv united states have the 50 cal jeep and humvee which are more maneuverable and can kill apcs easily
@@TheRealObj292The LAV-25 only has protection against non-AP 7.62x54Rmm, even a well aimed GP-25 can mobility kill it.
2:17 Good idea. Maybe use ctrl-scroll wheel on PC?
Oh btw, the dust radius is not "Completely exaggerated" it's toned down... you should watch some videos of the real one firing. It's a monster.
I don't think the commander has his own independent periscope in the lav25 like you would have with other vehicles like the BDRM-2. . If you at the sights they look like an identical copy if what the gunner has, coupled with the same hand controller. Externally the optical port on the commander's side is fixed to the turret, just like gunners.
I think the commander simply has the options to take control away from the gunner to control gunner sights if needed. I would expect this to implemented similarly to how pilot/copilot can lock or handoff controls to each other in helicopter, but would instead be applied to the rotation of the turret and use of owns one gunnery optics.
Is this in vanilla or just a mod?
experimental branch, testing for upcoming updates.
@@noahforester7715 thank you brother
Yes thank you sir
Comment regarding equipment
Does anyone know how the equipment is selected.
say LAV 25 and BRDM2
LAV 25 in service 1983
main armament M242 Bushmaster 25 mm
BRDM2 in service 1962
main armament 14.5 mm KPVT
I don't think you should compare these two vehicles based on their characteristics..
It would be more comparable if the USSR side had
BMP2 in service 1980
with main armament 30 mm 2A42
In general, I think that the USSR's armament is undernourished, but not from the point of view that the Soviets did not have similar armament to America at that time.
I think the ARMA developers have a bit of a biased view of equipment.
This is just my opinion
What are your opinions?
I think so too. The gear selection appears to favor soviets getting equipment that is 20 years older. I think there are some historical biases, and perhaps also the devs having easy access to a real BTR-70 from somewhere to model it and record the audio. That may explain the presence of a BTR-70, and not a BTR-80.
Someone else also told me that most of the advanced soviet weapons on vehicles at this time were tracked vehicles and refrogger has no tracked vehicles. A BMP-1 would be a very powerful vehicle in the current game setting.
Use BTR commander optics to spot, that's what it's for
wait.. does this mean soviets can throw grenades down the hatches?
Nice vid
It's a 1990 era game and it's missing most cold war weapons
This is a mod right?
Why the game is unfinished it's v 1.3 bruh this game should be full of content like its lacking most of Cold War weapons and equipment and vehicles
They should just give in and add a tank at this point
Tanks have tracks. Tracked vehicles have their own physics and mechanics they have to implement. The tanks available in 1989 also have things like advanced composite armor, explosive reactive armor kits, thermal and night vision optics, gun/turret stabilization systems, human loader positions for Western tanks and auto loaders for eastern bloc tanks and so on. They aren't a trivial addition and the LAV doesn't progress much us towards tanks mechanics wise.
Us console players can’t play 1.3 experimental only pc can
I Believe that xbox gets the test servers it's just a different app from the actual game
Hello guys when this update come??
Probably in like a month or two I think
Just as Oliver said I also heard around a month.
They need to stop adding vehicles without periscopes. Like add a basic view like the gunner has at least.
Thus it's name
but all of that was in mods added early 2024
German keyboard? I had assumed you're dutch
Why would they give the US a 25mm and not give USSR an equivalent? -_-
rpg-7
How long did the US not have an equivalent to the BTR? 😅
Having said that a BTR-80A or better the BTR-82A would be a viable counterpart I think.
Because tiny HE rounds (32g of explosive in a M792 HEI-T vs 180g in a M67 frag) and slightly better AP (when 14.5 already pens everything in game) aren't enough to justify adding BMP-1/2.
I think the devs focused on the BTR-70 because they had access to a real one to record the audio from. It would be great if they had a more modern BTR but I think these are harder to get where the developer has their offices.
@@brexxes reforger is set in '89, the BTR-80A was adopted in '94 and the BTR-82A was adopted in 2013.
Imagine dayz 2.0 on this. Ahh man. I know thjere are modded servers but.
Thumbnail looks like a photo
Lol you cant peak out anymore caus you have to hold the streering controls.
Also people peak out their head when driving, i did it all the time in Arma 3 when driving in safe areas or RTB from a mission.
Such a shit game