SIGMA 70-200 2.8 Sports REVIEW vs Canon 70-200 2.8L IS III - Is the CHEAPER Lens Actually BETTER?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 чер 2024
- WIN A CAMERA Mega FRO Giveaway froknowsphoto.com/megafro/
NEW FroPack 1 Lightroom Presets froknowsphoto.com/presets/ (40% off)
This is a review of the Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS HSM Sports lens. I decided to put it against the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS III to see which did better in the real world. I took both lenses out to a college basketball game along with two different Canon bodies. I used the Canon EOS R with EF adapter and the Canon 6D MARK II. Which lens did better, the $1,499 one of the $2,099 one?
Download Sample RAW Files Right Here froknowsphoto.com/sigma-70-200...
Order the Sigma 70-200 2.8 S bit.ly/2IzFQwr
Order the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS III bit.ly/2qUxdki
Download MyGearVault mygearvault.com/#download
Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.com/ (look for the orange box)
SIGMA 70-200 2.8 SPORT Review vs Canon 70-200 2.8 IS III (Is the CHEAPER Lens Better?)
____________________________________________________________________
Gear I USE
I SHOOT RAW Camera Bag bit.ly/2scQRt7
I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts bit.ly/2vG2igB
Nikon D5 bit.ly/2OBrXNa
Nikon Z7 bit.ly/2FfRPMY
Nikon Z6 bit.ly/2FcKsWJ
Nikon D850 bit.ly/2n54Xto
The Microphone I use for Vlogging bit.ly/2LWGRPq
Nikon 70-200 2.8 bit.ly/2OBsjmY
Nikon 24-70 2.8 VR bit.ly/2LLHdsQ
Nikon 14-24 2.8 bit.ly/2LK1NtU
Nikon 105 F1.4 bit.ly/2vttwUq
Sony a7 III bit.ly/2n3HaK8
My Rolling Bag Of Choice For Flying bit.ly/2LNsHRK
Follow me
►UA-cam: bit.ly/frotube
►Facebook: / froknowsphoto
►Instagram: / jaredpolin
►Twitter: / froknowsphoto
USE CODE FRO at squarespace.com/fro to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
Please help us continue to make FREE content
by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto
Educational guides. To check out previews of
each guide click here.
►froknowsphoto.com/guides
#FroKnowsPhoto #LensReview #Sigma sports photography canon eos r canon 6d mark ii portrait photography
Do you want to WIN a camera? I'm giving away one right here WIN A CAMERA Mega FRO Giveaway froknowsphoto.com/megafro/
@Jared can you test it with the MC-11 to see how it performs on the new Sony bodys? THANKS!!!
Really want a full frame camera.
Yes please!
Very nice of you Jared! Gratz for reaching 1mill subs, you deserve it! :)
Will would love to win but I couldn't even afford to buy the glass for it. I bought the cannon rebel series t6 for my wife because she wants to start this new endeavor but we soon found out how expensive this long life dream of hers can get and that's as far as it goes. But at least we are trying. That said we love your content and she has learned a lot in the short time she has had the t6. Keep them coming cause she looks forward to your videos.
You're so honest man! WOW! I truly appreciate you, the way you explained which one is the best for someone just starting out. Good luck in everything man.
This is so amazing. Today I read a comment from a guy on the Sigma 60 600 video: "Looking forward to see a real world review of the Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 Sports
"
Now you upload this. Excited to watch this.
The review I have been waiting for. You made the choice pretty easy! I'll be picking up the Sigma soon and cannot wait to get it. Keep up the great work and thank you!
Did you bought it?
Great review thanks Fro team your content is always a treat and I appreciate the work you put into your vids for people
thank you.
Just the review I needed. Thanks for the effort and putting this videos out, Jared, much appreciated!
I have the old version of both these lenses at work, and they’re awesome. I gotta say though, the Sigma is really impressive. Sigma lenses have gotten so good!
Thanks for the review. I’m happy to see that the Sigma works well on the EOS R.
Jared outstanding breakdown! Thanks for taking the time to provide such detail analysis it helped with figuring out which one I am getting.
The Canon lens is white, makes you look like a pro, nuff said. :)
Haha you can fake it with a white lens but at end of day is final images that count anyhow I get your point
KEN HUANG It’s a joke
Are we lens racist now? :D :D
Just spray paint the sigma
Unless you use it for video and you want to stay in the shadows. Sigma for the win. Black Lenses Matter.
Really great job with this review Jared! This is a lens that I’m definitely looking forward to purchasing.
I love Jared’s content! Always quick to the point and he explains everything with perfection. Solid content! I give this a 10 out 10. His podcast are dope too! A real person, doing real quality content! My go too!
After watching Id say both lenses did great and Im impressed with what 3rd party lenses have been doing as of late.. focus speed & accuracy... sharpness and color are on point.. Spending less on such lenses no longer means sacrificing quality.. I feel pros could feel confident using these lenses.
Hey man, congrats on your work! From this day I will follow your videos. I think you explain yourself so clear and your tests and knowledge are so helpful. I think I'll go with the Sigma, I'm used to carry weight in my photography journeys in the mountains. ;)
Hey Jared. Thanks for the enthusiastic video on this lens.. I shoot with the Crop lens of a 70D and have this lens. It's my first go-to lens since I purchased the Camera 4 years ago. Great lens!
Hi, you mean the Sigma?
The haters gonna hate, but these real world reviews are exactly why I watch your show. Keep it up, big homie!
Great review its so detailed and realistic! I allways love your reviews and kodus to your team for the hard work God bless you Fro!....
I just got the Sigma and it's totally awesome. The lens is super sharp and the optical stabilisation is the best I've used!
I am planning to buy sigma 70-200mm lence hope it’s better buy
Quality work. And excellent showcase of how a non-sports camera like the R can do it when being used properly.
Sigma made a huge name for themselves with the sigma 18-35 1.8
Indeed
@@divil2273 Exactly
Yes! Yes! Yes!!
@Jared Polin .. i gotta say i really love your Reviews as there is no BS nor bias towards one Lens or the other just good honest feedback on how they perform in real world situations ..
Great review! Shots are on point!
nice review and thx for testing on the eos R
Such a great review, Jared!
Great video as usual! I got the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 ex os hsm on my old Canon 6D and I'm happy with the result.
Thanks bro! This will be my first 70-200 and Im going for the sigma thanks to your review!
@harolsblog How is the 70-200 after a year of using?
Yap Vi Seng I ended up purchasing the canon from a guy how used it 3 months for $1400 😬😬😬. With the written warranty from B&H. A year after, the Canon is a superb lens 😍😍😍 one of my favorites. Always search ebay for a good deal.
Don't worry, I got you. I just ordered the sigma, I'll post a review here in a few days letting you know how it is. @@hunterVworld
I think 15-20 years ago there was a bit of a stigma about buying third party lenses and using them on pro body cameras (people would say there's no point, or it's a waste of money). But now Sigma has come on a long way... the 24-105 art lens is fantastic, and Sigma lenses are a great alternative.
Awesome review Jared! They both look really good. As a Canon shooter I personally would get a Canon 70-200 II used. Besides that we all should consider Sigma and Tamron.
Thank you!, yet again, for all your time and effort! much appreciated!
Great review Jared. I'm currently in the market for the canon 70-200 but I plan to buy a used lens. There is a lot of pretty good deals out there for around $1100 bucks. Keep up the great reviews!
On one of your videos you were able to review the contemporary lens for Sigma then that's when I decided to go for it. Some of us have photography as hobby and not able to afford expensive lenses. A year I got the Sigma contemporary lens 150-600mm ; then few days ago I purchased a used Canon 70-200 2.8 USM without IS. Thank you for taking the time to review both lenses.
Just got the Sigma last week and thrilled I saved the money. Got to use it on my t3i and had some focus issues in low light, but that’s the 9 focus points on the t3i. We will see how it does with my 90D once I get it (on preorder). As a higher level amateur the sigma really fit the bill!
How did it end up performing on the 90d?
@@rowen0fstrataright
Always respect your lack of bias when looking at gear Jared. Good review. Both pretty incredible lenses, the Sigma is astounding for the price. I have a Canon 6D Mark ii and think it is pretty remarkable for the price
Tremendous real world comparison, as usual, Jared. You're the best out there at testing, comparing and reviewing cameras and lenses. Even someone like Michael the Maven, who puts in a tremendous effort with his comparisons, doesn't do truly real world reviews. He shoots "set up" scenarios. A girl jogging on a field is nothing like a bunch of overlapping people moving erratically and competing for a ball (and competing for the camera's AF attention at the same time).
I love the way you demonstrate that almost any camera can get the job done, while other reviewers try to convince us we need the latest and greatest camera to capture a good shot, which is utter nonsense.
Your efforts are truly appreciated.
Great video. The "lens alliance" always makes me laugh. You mentioned the Tamron G2. How does that compare to the Sigma?
Nobody seems to make a comparison yet? I would like to see side by side
I'm so glad you found the sigma to be solid. I've been looking forward to this lens for a long time. Now I just need to pull the trigger on a body upgrade. lmao.
Korey Bartos check Facebook marketplace religiously. I just got my new 1Dx mk ii for a great price. There’s always some nice bodies from people who are updating, or switching brands
@@micklemons8885 Curious, what did you get the mk ii for?
Luke Zacharias photography and videography. Plus it was my favorite of canon’s line up. Basically I got it because I liked it lol. Definitely wouldn’t recommend it for stuff like portraits, etc, even though it holds up beautifully. At the end of the day it’s still a specialty camera for sports and wildlife.
I like your review. As always, your reviews are straight forward.
your reviews are very helpful.... 😊. Let me keep watching
I'd love to see a direct comparison with the Canon, Tamron and Sigma now that all of them have a "newer" version out.
Really care about the glass quality, and better, long-lasting usage ?
Put the bucks in and go for Canon.
Canon glasses are the best in market, no doubt about that.
Thanks for the video and the RAW-files. Both helped me with my decision. I bought the sigma.
thank you for continue making these type of video
Excellent review, thanks Fro.
Really great review man!!
Not sure where you're located but it's great to see ECU in action! Thank you for that. Also enjoyed the thorough and informative review.
Is there a review of the Sigma compared to the Nikon yet? Can’t wait and thank you!! Great stuff!
Great review - I've got an EOS R and I'm trying to decide between these exact lenses. Sigma takes it
I was waiting for this video, since Nikon version just being released, would be great to see a real world review with that one against the nikon 70-200 versions VR versions. Anyone else agree?
Jared & FroKnows Team, thanks for this comparison video. I pleased to hear that the big third party names are improving their offerings. Although the Sigma is heavier and has a larger filter thread size, Sigma gives 3-year warranty compared to 1-yr for Canon.
QUESTION: Jared, are the buttons on the Sigma programable to toggle between AF Single and AF Servo or initiate the viewfinder level? Thanks in advance.
Thanks Jared! i've been waiting for this for a while.
thank you so much for testing the sigma with the EOS R as I'm going to do the same for sports photos.
Perfectly timed video Fro! I'm looking at upgrading to a f/2.8 lens for my Canon EOS-R to shoot high school lacrosse. I'm not entirely sure the 70-200 gives me enough reach (currently use Canon 100-400) but it might be my best option since games are in the evenings, under the lights and I really need a f/2.8 lens. Not sure there's another lens out there (under $2,000) that's going to match up. Any suggestions??? Thanks for all the great content!
Came back to this Video since I see a Sigma 70-200 close with good price... forget the glass.. I appreciate you being human and missing focus on the eye a few times and comming clean and saying.. it's not the lens.. that is why we follow you. Thank you Jared. keep it up!
Something to remember: Simga lenses, in my extensive ownership, have difficulties focusing consistently on Canon DSLRs. They've been flawless on the EOS R.
Sigma and Tamron have greatly improved in build quality and optical quality over the past 5-8 years. Sigmas original 85mm f/1.4 and 70-200 f/2.8 OS lenses were the start of something big for them. Finally, the build quality and design have gotten to top levels.
Great review. Thanks for the info.
Quality review. Thanks Jared.
Honestly like you said, these are two greats lenses. It depends on the personal choice of the buyer. Like me, my equipment is Canon since always. Thank you Jarod for all your tecnical informations, I never miss one! Have a nice day! Guy
Great review mr Fro.
Great video my friend. Helped a lot
Great review Jared! Based on this review and your knowledge, how do you think the Sigma would handle shooting concerts and live shows? Thx!
I brought the canon version 3 right when it came out and it is a great lens, but sigma is really stepping up their game.
I bought the Sigma today, I am definitely a beginner level and have two cropped cameras, my original Rebel t7i which I loved to learn on, and now my Canon 90d. This is the one I will be using with the lens. I have being doing some wildlife and outdoor desert shooting so I bit the bullet and added the 70-200mm 2.8 to my bag. Like you the store guy who has the Canon couldn’t justify the extra $600 for my level and needs. Thank you the video did calm me down after dropping a lot of money!!
This lens is the latest I have in my bag from Sigma having already purchased a number of Art Series lenses as well as the 100-400mm Contemporary. I tested it this past weekend at a Cycling event here in Perth, Australia with amazing results. Even with head on downhill speeds approaching 60 kmh and filling the frame, this lens didn't miss. It is an outstanding piece of equipment.
I should add, I had it on my 1DX
Fantastic video, Jared! You were thorough and fair. And everyone knows that as Tony and Chelsea always say, “Canon glass is awesome!” Yet you make a great case for the Sigma and for a non-professional, that might be the way to go. Also loved the way you put the EOS R to work in Temple’s gym. Great photos!
I think the main issue with Sigma has been that they haven't had the necessary access to get a similar level of integration. I personally haven't had issues with 3rd party lenses.
Northrup. Is ANYONE still taking these guys seriously?
14:20 I actually prefer the look as it is, you can see the hopes and dreams in the audience if you so choose to, and if it was a decisive moment in the game it would have been a really good thing to include. It's not distracting, there's a clear separation, but if you completely blow out the audience, what's the purpose of the game? The audience is an important part of team sports and a good component to include to contribute to the atmosphere of the photo.
Interesting thought about how we define third-party. Great photography, by the way. Jared, you always seem to get the best from any gear...even if its design is not your preference (focus/zoom ring locations) and you SHOW us. Sierra Hotel! (I prefer the Canon...I agree about the ring locations...muscle memory).
Very nice comparison. Thanks
I made my decision for a few weeks for the Canon in via Amazon and the Canon winter sale and get for 1870 € compared to price of 2300€ in the Canon online store. And it’s a great lens! I really enjoy the photos made with this lens.
I just purchased Canon R6 because of you :) Great review again! :)
cant wait for the next 1dx.
Just picked up a demo Sigma 70-200 f2.8 (sport) with an Mc-11 to play with (thank you Sigma) looking forward to taking it out for a test run...
Thanks man for the very detailed but non-boring analysis. I'm a big fan of Sigma on EOS but you're right, the focus on moving subjects is not easy. Sometimes I focus manually.
Can't wait for the 70-200 f2.8 RF to drop.
I was waiting for this video!
I have headaches for days because I do not know if I should get the Sigma 70-200 and the 24-70 of Sigma but yes I'll pick up for my a7iii
Can't wait to have this lens for my Nikon D750 thanks so much all my questions were answered :)
Great review!
Jared - Awesome video, as usual. I have an EOS R with the EF adapter. I'm looking at getting the Sigma 70-200 with the 2x extender. Any concerns for image quality with all this on the camera at once?
I'm in the same boat and would like to know as well!
The lenses from the EF mount should work natively on the RF mount when using a native EF to RF adapter. What will you use this combination for, especially with the extender? I would never recommend a 2x extender. If you need the also reach, get another lens, use a 1.4x or crop a bit. If it’s for sports, you might be better with a Sigma 120-300mm S or Canon 300mm f/2.8L. If it’s for wildlife photography, I wouldn’t get anything less than 400mm. 70-200mm + 2x extender is not a good choice for wildlife photography. It would be better just going for the 100-400mm II or Canon 400mm f/5.6L.
Great great great content as usual, thank you very much, you don’t how big of help you are
One critical point I’d love to see covered - how well the Warranty’s are covered and how quickly repairs are made.. Canon’s CPS Service is fantastic and often “on site” at major events. CPS is one major reason for some of the price differences in these products, and why you see so many real Pro’s are sticking with Canon. Coupled with their “loaner program”, their Pro Service means money in the bank.
Jared, you should do a comparison between 70-200 2.8 Tamron G2, Sigma Sports, or Nikon VR2. G2, Sports and used VR2 are all very similar in price, once the Sigma for Nikon is released
Fronomenal review of a phenomenal lens.
Thanks Fro. I went to two different stores today and just about put down my money to take the Canon home but thought I would watch a few more videos and came across this one. $600 is a big difference. I only want to buy it once. Ultimately, I think we justify what we want anyway but I do like other Sigma products that I have or have had. At the end of the day, using it with my SkyGuideer Pro, the lighter weight does make a difference and I will probably get back in my car and go by the Canon anyway. Seems like the sharpness, clarity, and noise were better with the Canon.
Woah. Both are great. I assume that the Sigma on a Nikon will be as good as the Nikon 70-200 VR II, so don't disappoint me, Jared. :)
I've got the Nikon D7200 and hope the Sigma will be a beast on my sweet cam. Thank you for your videos, by the way!
Minute 5:00 "Tamron does the WC😂😂". FANTASTIC VIDEO
Sigma Killin it! We need more third party options!
I like your computer setup. What keyboard do you use? Looks slick!
I have the Tamron 70-200 f 2.8 and the zoom ring on the outside helps me stabilize even on a monopod
Hey Jared I know this is an old video but did you have OS on when shooting the action? If so at what shutterspeed would the OS be not worth having on?
Thank you so much for the tips.
Fro to frow-- thanks for helping ya boy grow, J
Cheers!
Dar
Thanks Jared, I found this very helpful. I bought the Sigma and use it on the EOS RP. It works fine and the images are as super sharp as you say, the bokeh is nice and the weight is actually ok. I found the autofocus to be sluggish though and I'm still contemplating, if I can live with that, but probably will, because the image quality is so fantastic and the price is right.
Slugish???? 4 real... Fist time i read this???
@@damjanstijovic1208 Yes, that was my impression. I traded it for the Tamron a week later and found it worked better with the autofocus. But that's just me.
@@Yankeededandy62 now you really scared me 😔
@@damjanstijovic1208 Just try it. You don't have to rely on my comment. I didn't do scientific testing.
@@Yankeededandy62 i would if i could 😔
Yes, Temple University! Go Owls! Do you have any examples of the gymnastic meets?
Hey Jared, when you get a new lens do you do micro adjustments right away?
I currently own the Sigma Sport and I absolutely love it!. I find it hard to believe that the Canon lens can produce better/sharper images. I think I might loan the Canon lens and try my own real life review
I would've like to see some real world photos during daylight where they were shot in 100-400 ISO,
Also some video AF examples would be nice.
Af motor is in body
No editing at all? Wow.
White balance? Vibrance? HSL?
Nice pics. I've been curious about the EOS R in this type of setting (indoor sports). Thanks, i already have the Canon lens, just need the camera now.
I'm still a student, looking to make money to invest in this hobby.
Guess I'll stick with the Sigma for now
Wow! I own an old version of the Sigma and right now I am thinking of replacing it with the sports version.
Most excellent review from the Fro. Thanks for all of the reviews you do. Helping me decide where I want to put my money, if ever I have some to spend.
As usual, fantastic review. You give all keys to do the best choice, thanks. 600$ cheaper but 300g heavier than the canon III that’s the question. We have to consider also the old canon version II which is very good too.
Also keep in mind that these are high end lenses, you're not likely to be replacing them unless they're destroyed, stolen or you switch systems. Over the course of a career, or even just hobby, the cost of a lens of this price isn't that much. Back in the days of film when you had to be paying per shot, you could easily hit this kind of cost in a couple years if you were doing a lot. Developing, even at home, isn't the cheapest thing in the world.
Hope you do this test with the MC11 adapter for us sony guys aswell!
Yep. You owe us! I bought A7iii after your review :D
@@bamit1979 rumor is that the 70-200 and 100-400 for native e mount were going to be released after the 24-70 which was just released last month. no point adapting it for a video if it's going to have a native variant released shortly
@@ynwadhd The 70-200mm E-mount will only be F4.