Public Health is a Lie!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 кві 2023
- Doctor who almost had his medical license revoked tells us about how public information about COVID is "disinformation". Let's have a closer look.
Support me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=3308388
Follow me on Twitter: / stickprofessor
Become a Member: / @professorstick
Check out my merch: teespring.com/stores/professo...
Original Video: • Public Health FAILURE:...
Further Reading:
vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/covid-19-vacc...
health-desk.org/articles/what...
sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
An educated guess is NOT disinformation, why does guy still have a license?
It's annoyingly hard to lose your medical license
Especially since I'm he is spreading disinformation.
@@kendokaaaespecially when there are only a certain number of physicians allowed in america
i have no clue either, it's perplexing how people this inadequate find themselves in positions of power.
isn't this the same guy who went around saying that "schools are putting litterboxes for furries"? something tells me that this guy isn't exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer
Yeah he did repeat that. I don't think it started with him, but he repeated it as if it's true. He seems to have a bunch of radical beliefs, some that will cause my comment to be censored if I repeat them.
I find it hilarious that this guy says “natural immunity is just as good as vaccinated immunity.” Let’s assume that’s the case, it’s demonstrably true that the mortality rate from _obtaining_ natural immunity is significantly higher than the mortality rate of being vaccinated. So, if the immunity you get is comparable, but one process of obtaining it is measurably safer, isn’t _that_ method still better?
The "natural immunity" proponents always seem to forget about the process required for natural immunity to develop... as if it just pops into existence, or Piggly Wiggly has it next to the nasal spray.
One of my wife's coworkers refused the vaccine and has had COVID 4 times now. Everyone else took the vaccine and has had it once each
The people who survived the black death were immune to Yersinia pestis, just like if they had a vaccine! Minus the 40+ million who died, small details.
Natural immunity is better. Those who believe get very sick or die. Those who believe in vaccines don't get sick, or have less intense symptoms when they do, and are much more likely to survive. Also much less likely to end up in the hospital. A select few will have a natural immunity and not get sick.
Thing is vaccinated immunity is natural immunity. Only difference is you don't get sick. Both trigger the body to create the cells needed to fight an infection. One is the real deal battle against the enemy while your body creates the weapons needed and you can die from it. The other is essentially a training exercise with cardboard cutouts as the enemy.
Oh god this failure who got beat DOWN in the 2022 MN Governor's race.
Just googled this man, it's outrageous to see doctors talk like this but hah he was a politician at some point.
Who let him out of his cage, again? Cherry-picking real Doctors and Scientists and twisting the information into non-sensical gibberish to fit his little narrative……He ought to be a Creationist! It’s disgusting!……
He's using "public health" as a nameless, faceless "they" and trying to tie that into an anti-eliteism argument.
Oh ffs, this is still going on? And this guy accuses experts of misrepresenting/hiding the facts and then does exactly that
Sitting on a chair and talking online is not scientific evidence published in respected papers. Sorry Scott.
We really dodged a bullet with him losing the election for Governor of Minnesota
You piked my curiosity. Gosh he came dangerously close!
This is THAT guy?? Hoo boy.
dodged one indeed. It's frightening how the crazies are trying to gain power
@@stevehutton6984 *piqued... Piking is way more violent. ;-)
@@irrelevant_noob Whoops, sorry you're absolutely right. I even used to be excellent at spelling, and I also use to speak French, so really my only excuse is that I'm getting old!
Both of my roommates caught it but I didn't even though we lived in the same apartment. I wore a mask the whole time.
Not only have I never caught covid, I haven't caught a single cold, flu, or even respiratory infection since wearing a mask in public (and I used to catch something about twice a year).
That's a lovely anecdote.
@@hattielankford4775 Yes, yes it is.
i got vaxxed and i didnt get covid from my teacher who sat RIGHT across from me and unvaxxed dudes in the back of the class caught it
It's like where the UK had a tankers driver strike, causing petrol to be in short supply, so they drove slower. Remember all those people saying they were spending half as much but only getting 10 minutes later for it. Lasted until petrol was easier. IMO it was likely when someone else went 80 past them and they "had to" speed up.
@@hattielankford4775 And it not only has more of them (making data), it also has causation: airborne particles are stopped if the air they travel in is slowed or stopped.
'So and such a person wrote this!'
(Reads three words out a several thousand page document)
'What this paper means is this!'
(No longer sources paper/document, nor provides any substantive material, proceeds to medisplain(?) The intention of the paper).
Science done good.
Stupid people will always believe whatever makes them feel comfortable despite whether or not it's true.
"Natural immunity is as good, or better than vaccinated immunity..." Except for those that died before completing their journey to natural immunity.
Mom, Can we get vaccinated to have immunity?
_We have immunity at home._
Immunity at home:🪦
Yes, I was going to mention this too.
Some people seem to have a hard time with critical thinking skills.
you can always tell misinformation because they use buzzwords in a way that makes it apparent they either don't know what they mean, or don't want their audience to know what they mean.
These con men are getting out of hand.. wait, wern't they always? Great video Mr Stick!
Cardiologist, not biologist - Republican and seminary graduate... stir in a little arrogance and a dash of ignorance to get the mini-volcano of BS that Prof. Stick was kind enough to share with us...
From having been out in the public during the pandemic I've found the biggest part of the problem with public health was the public. They whined about every little thing. Instead of just wearing a mask they'd cry about it and make up excuses. If a place wanted me to wear a mask I'd most likely have forgotten and had to go back for it. My boss at the time knew I always kept my distance so I kinda didn't have to wear one. If I went out on location I'd wear one. I still have not had it, mostly because I don't get in people's faces.
So this guy is a doctor? I wonder of what. He doesn't know that there's a difference between a virus and a disease. I'm not a doctor and that one caught my ear.
When I first heard about the Lockdown I thought it would take three weeks and the infection rate would drop off a cliff.
But _people_ .
@@JohnDlugosz Right. I had heard about the outbreak in like late November early December and thought it was going to drop off by about the time my mom died in February. But shortly after that they were calling for the lockdowns. I even had a customer at a later point try to group mom into the death count but I had to squash that quick. Given that she died of a brain aneurysm.
I understand why people don't want to wear masks, its uncomfortable and i personally have trouble breathing in it, as it gets wet the moisture in the mask makes breathing through it uncomfortable for me... But the solution isn't to not wear mask, i just tried to minimise the time i had to wear it for. So quick speed run through store with mask and throw it out as soon as i reach my car and i just stayed at home most of the time. I had almost no trouble in the pandemic, despite the fact that having the mask for longer periods of time made me feel like im about to throw up. (idk if other people had the same issue. But i always struggled with that, and 8hrs in the lab felt like eternity to me each time. I avoid lab work at all costs xD)
@@mitotakjde9763 "and i personally have trouble breathing in it"
Muslim women can wear a burkah and that is far bigger a mask than you had to wear, and they had to wear it longer. So how come you can't manage what women managed for years???? Also, so what? Know where that moisture goes you complain about? On other people's faces.
IMO this is where a lot of "hate for wearing a mask" comes from. Can't claim "muslims are bad, see women made to wear a mask!!!!" if you are "made to wear a mask" too.
He discredited himself when he went on about natural immunity.
I've noticed every time I hear someone use the word bureaucrat I can almost always completely ignore everything else they say. It's like the maga hat of public discourse.
Public Health in New Zealand worked.
It’s also worth mentioning that the virus itself both possesses and generates the production of the spike protein. I find it fascinating that the harm done by SARS2 itself is never referenced by these people, just their fantasy of dangerous vaccines. Death, long covid, and heart muscle damage, are some of the real quantifiable outcomes of infection (particularly for the unprotected).
Thank you for recording the lecture professor, ill email you if I have questions about the homework
Once he stated natural immunity was better than vaccinated immunity you knew he was on his own mission of disinformation.
It should be taught in school at the beginning of every class that the thing that vaccines do is GIVE natural immunity. "Alright class, it's dodgeball today, but before you start your stretches, remember that the whole point of vaccines is to teach your natural immune system new tricks, vaccines aren't magical RPG antidote consumables."
It makes you wonder how he defines "better".
From what I heard, best immunity in terms of actual immunity would be vaccination+infection or vice versa (not sure anymore which one is slightly better).
But we agree, the risks involved getting natural immunity (without being vaccinated) are higher than the risks coming from the vaccination.
The vaccination also had similar potential sideeffects like the actual infection, but the risk was overall about factor 10 lower, e.g. if a heart infection would happen with a risk of 1:10000 with a vaccine, it would happen with a risk of roughly 1:1000 with infection.
Professor Stick, great job! Love you debunking this 'dis' info, lol! 👍💙💖🥰✌
There's no way that guy is a biologist. If he's a biologist then Kent Hovind is a science educator.
1:37 So Newton's law of gravitation was misinformation ?
No more than your car's speedometer telling you you are travelling 100 km/hr is misinformation, when you are really travelling 99.6 km/hr. It is well within the margin of uncertainty for 99.6 km/hr to be rounded to 100 km/hr. You might be able to use radar to determine your speed to a lot greater precision. That doesn't mean your speedometer is wrong, when it never claimed to be that precise in the first place.
Likewise N's law of gravity is as much a matter of misinformation as a speedometer with an uncertainty. It has its known limitations and gives us reasonable enough results when those limitations are not applicable.
I know basically nothing about biology. This guy's spike protein scare had me laughing with incredulity.
😂😂😂😂
The thing to remember is that there is a kernel of truth in there, just not the entire "theory". My personal go-to example is Sept11th. "The government blew up the towers" is their accusation. The kernel of truth is two facts: 1. The buildings fell down faster than their design. 2. Engineers didn't go over the wreckage that is SOP in any case, but doubly so in cases where the design might be wrong. Sure, "steel beams melt but softening happens a LOT earlier", but the DESIGN was to last 30 minutes longer. Did they use softer steel? Did the design contain an error? *I* point out that someone cutting corners and not expecting ANY flight into them during its lifetime, cut those corners, got a massive bonus and, because the company was necessarily well connected, and the government, already having said "we will not support this heinous act!!!!" found themselves unable politically to say "this company did it", so stuck with "those brown people did it!!!!", because if the company was outed, it would be crucified and fold. So the building failed faster, but was never EXPECTED to be tested that way, and that is why there was no engineer report on the superstructure. Because of greed, which we 100% see in real world, no "conspiracy" needed, and embarrassment (if you don't look, you can't tell).
Released something on Twitter and he felt I don't care about his feelings.
Nothing like the should of would of game done by those who critique the past.
Politicians hold controls of the purse strings this does nothing more then stall efforts by health officials.
Those who jobs are hired/fired by the electorate causes them to watching the seesaw of opinion until Politicians react.
Found you in 2017 never stopped watching, love your content really love the creation stuff keep it up :)
This dude has big “Gym Teacher who shows off on the 4 square court” energy.
The nasal passage stuff... The kernel of truth that he totally blows out of proportion is:
There is a more-or-less tissue specific immune response in the upper respiratory system which current COVID vaccines don't boost much, but actually getting infected often does (assuming the learning part of that immune system responds quick enough and also doesn't over-respond in a way that kills you.)
Saying the human immune system is complicated is a massive understatement.
This guy was a candidate for GOVERNOR of my state (Minnesota). Thank FUCK he didn't get in.
Anatomy major here with a small nitpick. He said nasopharynx as he grabbed his laryngeopharynx also known as the hypopharynx. Not really relevant to the video but still a nitpick none the less.
Sounding knowledgable is easy for some.Convinced as they are. Till we get to see the contrast against someone who actually knows
Another red flag is when somebody refers to the definition in the dictionary. When I see that I generally know somebody's up to something
Why is this supposed doctor defining the word "disinformation" and then openly say things that have been proven false and that he should know from his profession?
> Scott M. Jensen (born November 19, 1954) is an American physician and politician. A member of the Republican Party, he was a member of the Minnesota Senate from 2017 to 2021. He was the Republican nominee for governor of Minnesota in the 2022 election. (source: Wikipedia)
Ah, that's why.
Professor Stick, with respect to this mouth piece always remember, it is impossible to get someone to understand anything if their income depends on not understanding it.
So... he doesn't understand what he's reading. Brilliant.
The biggest failure was embracing stupidity. So many lives could have been saved but we got caught up in "both sides-ism" and gave dumb dumbs a podium. I don't know anybody that rips out all of the filters from their vehicles and thinks the vehicle will operate much longer and better with no air filter, no water filter, no fuel filter and no oil filter.
I don't know of anybody that is just going to grow something moldy in their car engine or just run around and say to hell with keeping water out of the fuel. It boggled my mind how dumb people were.
Yeah. Public is a concept. It doesn't have a health bar
1:20 I was taught in grade school that a statement is either a fact or opinion. In this classification, a "fact" can be false. Classifying examples, like "The wall is painted red." is a fact, even though our wall was actually white. In contrast, "The wall's color is pretty." is an opinion.
Then you were taught wrong. A statement is either objective or subjective (opinion). An objective statement is either false or true. Only a true objective statement is a fact. A fact cannot ever, by definition, be false.
@@nagranoth_ I guess the legal term for this is "statement of fact". A statement of fact is not necessarily true.
I've had people, even otherwise _rational_ people, tell me that a fact can be wrong. They all double down when I say "So 4+4=2 is a fact?" and it makes me want to tear my hair out. Same thing with gods; you hear otherwise sensible people say "Naw cultists have reasons for believing in an imaginary magic man in the sky who does magic that makes it rational!"
It's like they've been taught to confuse facts and factoids or reasons with _excuses._ No, officer, I had a valid reason for burning that red light: I felt like it. _Well shit, that certainly is a reason, you're free to go!_ I don't think so. It's just that there isn't a pithy, convenient word for the opposite of a fact, and people who are wrong often just state their Wrong as "that's a fact".
Statement, claim, guess, _whatever_ are not the same things as facts. If someone says the wall is painted red, they're saying that it outputs light in a certain wavelength, hue, _whatever._ If the light being output isn't those certain hues, then "the wall is painted red" isn't a fact, it's a lie or false statement.
If we don't hold to a reality-based definition for the word "fact" then everyone should henceforth get 100% in every math exam no matter what answers they give.
@@audiblek well yeah, but that means a statement CAN be factual, meaning you're making an objective claim that you want people to believe is a fact. That doesn't mean it IS a fact whether or not it's true.
@@EdwardHowton yeah we're really missing a word there. If someone makes a false claim and the clearly know it's false you can call it a lie, but if it's just wrong there's not a singular word for it. Non-fact wouldn't work because that also fits subjective statements... False objective statement would be the best description I suppose, but that's hardly convenient to say. A... nact maybe?
The problem that made people think natural immunity = vaccinated immunity, is there was limited vaccinations & people tested for immunity where suggested to not get the shot so people with no immunity could use it first. People that recovered from covid where in some cased tolled not to get the shot & to wait. Yet this was done not because natural was better but because it was better then nothing & vaccinations where limited & so priorities had to be set. As well as all the side effect people where talking about made some people opt not to get the vaccination if there was a different way. Yet this only happened when the covid vaccinations where a very new thing.
I got covid at about the time when the vaccinations started. Afterwards I waited 6 months before getting the actual vaccine, because why should I with a certain amount of immunity use up a shot that is much more useful for someone else?
I got a chronic lime Disease ad before this vid
Disinformation, misinformation, and simply being wrong.
Name one time so called public health hasn't made a situation worse..
Almost all of them.
Citations needed.
Prof. U r usually correct; including in this video. Unfortunately, as a scientist, we can sometimes be too slow to ‘recognize’ a particular eminent or revolutionary scientists findings
This goes to show you, conspiracies can infect anyone.
He's a cardiologist. Asking for a cardiologist's opinion on vaccines and disease is like asking an IT guy to fix your car. If the IT guy knew how to fix your car it's for reasons that have nothing to do with his day job.
@@matthewgagnon9426 . The cardiologist said to get the vaccine. DocScott in the video is general practitioner, an even worse example.
Can you take a look into the whole died suddenly thing?
Wow.
I love when you laugh at the idiocies 6:10
Great video.
Excellent video, Professor! I sure love your videos!
sounds to me like someone that is both a scientist & a bureaucrat
@5:25 "Strawman"? No.
My guess is that this doctor at sometime asked a question, and instead of getting an answer; he got his feeling hurt by being ridiculed.
As a result, he has doubled down on his question, choosen an answer in opposition, and just as a compulsory gambler has the desire to
win big, he has the desire to prove himself right above the current consensus.
In short, in his need to "save face", he can not allow himself to turn around, as he has gone astray, finding himself more and more
lost down the rabbit hole. It is the "throwing good money after the bad" scenario, quite human and understandable. But very sad, and irritating.
This irritating nature, unfortunately makes it annoyingly arduous to find the strength and time to explain, to stop him from going any further, as
he will not willingly stop, thinking that the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow is to be found just around the corner.
I definitely agree, in that I think a lot of people who seem to hold nonsensical beliefs or positions will have arrived there by being somewhat ridiculed for a much more moderate opinion, and doubling down on it.
Man at a glance that dude looked like old Dodgson from Jurassic World
Also, he sounds american, so there's nothing about public health here, it's all profit driven, clearly...
Magical video.
5:45 ish - Hey interlocutor (i forgot his name)... how do you get natural immunity WITHOUT EXPOSING YOURSELF TO THE VIRUS???
Reality is most definitely is not a partisan liberal entity, but watching the right's response to it could certainly lead a person to believe that it might be just that.
Thanks so much for sharing. 😉👌🏻
another amazing vid thanks! Can you do our latest best knowledge on mask and distancing and % transmission airborne vs surfaces for Xbb variant? Thanks!
"Ultracrepidarian" is the word you're looking for.
Thanks for the video :)
Spike protein build up in tissues would be a problem due to potential strong immune response in vulnerable body parts being able to damage said parts.
It is very very very rare tho as far as I read and thus shouldnt be focused on so heavily.
Good video.
By scuenficof beaurocrat doesn't he mean someone with a vested interest other than science ... isn't that obvious ? Like sitting down any conversation about where the virus comes from as opposed to investigating all possible outcomes? Just a thought
A fact is something that is true or false, as opposed to opinion
A fact is a statement in the form that can be true or false. If I say "fire trucks are blue", that is still a statement in the form of a fact. It can be proven that fire trucks are not blue, because you can take a picture and use Photoshop's eyedropper tool to prove that they are not blue, even if you yourself are colorblind. A fact does not have to be true, to technically be a fact. A fact just has to be provable, and not necessarily proven, to be a fact.
An opinion is a statement where whether it is true or false, cannot be proven, because it is subject to the preferences of the person who said it. Other people would have to be mind readers to prove whether an opinion is true or false.
You are my favorite big head little creature
Of all the sticks, he is without a doubt the most professorial.
culd we say he is spreading misinformation about how spike works on while on the blood?
The trick this fool uses, something the most successful con-men also use, is to use some true, or relatively true, arguements and statements to make them seem legitimate but they're only there to help him sell the parts that are rubbish - or in his words, dis-information.
He's the usual enlightened centrist: a right wing anti-intellectual too embarrassed to admit it.
He's not even a centrist, he's a Republican politician.
@@matthewgagnon9426 Enlightened Centrists are rarely actually centrists. They usually are right wingers.
Ah, people on both sides of the aisle agree, do they? I guess as long as he phrases the things that they disagree on *really* specifically, he can say that. They don't agree on the nature of the problem OR the nature of the solution, or on how "public health" failed... like, at all. So don't specify any of that. Keep it vague, help people to feel like they agree with him before he's even said anything, very smart.
People on one side of the aisle disagreed with some aspects of the handling of the pandemic; people on the other side of the aisle disagreed whether the pandemic was even real. So no, they didn't agree. I'm not sure who or what he even means by "public health", tbh. The CDC? Politicians trying to turn science's inquiries into actionable policy in a hurry? Or is this just about setting up an opponent of "private health", in order to make some cackhanded argument against UHC?
I’d say Jensen is a woo peddler ND which stands for not doctors ,I bet has some essential oils 😂
He is a doctor? In what, bullshitologie?
5:20 - _"Natural immunity is as good [as] or better than vaccinated immunity."_
How does one _get_ this "natural immunity"?
Hint: you have to catch COVID.
So at first you have _no_ immunity, where you could have at least had a vaccine protecting you. You're skipping the crucial step of infection.
If you want to make a comparable case after initial infection, then you have to do that to both hypothetical people. How does immunity solely from infection compare to immunity from vaccination _and_ infection? I don't think the former group wins out here.
Didn’t you quit UA-cam??
Yup, he quit on the first of April ;) .
Yeah... Merriam-Webster is full of mistakes. Stick to the Oxford dictionary...
Stick we decide for ourselves how we speak our own language. How words are used evolves over time.
We know how to speak English just fine.
We don't have to pass an English test.
You clearly don't, tho... And it's not "your" language, you just kept using it.
@@irrelevant_noob English is Americas primary language therefore our language and we decide for ourselves how we use it.
@@Gfish17 well in that case, English is the Internet's primary language therefore my language too, so i can now decide how you need to use it, including not skipping apostrophes. :p
@@irrelevant_noob I'll decide how I speak English for myself. Apostrophes are largely vestigial with minimal real necessity.
We also could simplify The " Your, You're, " situation by having just one version be context based "Your" should just be all one needs.
@@Gfish17 why not simplify it further? Grunts should be all one needs. 🙄
first, HA!
congratulations 🎉
🏆🍾💰👏👏👏
Look it up in Meriam-Webster? No thanks, I'd rather look it up in a *_REAL_* dictionary of the English language rather than a lexicon of the 'Murrican dialect.
American is the real English. The only reason colonists were sent to North America at all was to give them a chance get the language back on track after the Brits had royally bullocksed it up.
Pls Professor Stick give us a darker background pls my eyes are bleeding
The clown in the video talking about science probably has never taken a science course since the fourth grade. The terminology and rhetoric he is using even the "know to be true" part is straight out of Christian preaching. The way he holds his hands forward with fingers up and palms down in the "Now hold on" pose is straight out of the body language of Southern Baptists Preachers when they are making a point. To me, gray haired or not, this is not a man whose opinion I would ever respect. There is no monolithic scientific beurocracy. This is blame shifting and we know exactly the group and faction that was pushing the misinformation and disinformation. He thinks we have the same attention span that he does when we don't. I appreciate you making this video but I can't watch all of it because I don't feel that clown deserves to have air time.
Oh, what "kind" of doctor ....... dr of WHAT ? dr of religion ..... hah, hah, ........ sad
1:09 Definition of "to state fact" : to speak as if you do know the truth, even if you don't.
7:03 _"A cardiologist said this"_
And my plumber said that … your point is?
(A cardiologist is not an expert in immunology ⇾ appeal to authority fallacy)
9:22 Your own chart says otherwise. See point 6 where the protein is released.
0:47 China had the best strategy in the beginning. The totalitarian approach could have prevented to let Covid go endemic, if implemented worldwide. However, China failed in their vaccination strategy.
3:38 .... Aaaaaaand you missed the point. You are speaking of scientists that somehow have a bureaucratic function/ a say in bureaucracy.
However, he speaks of bureaucrats with more or less scientific knowledge. Probably with the emphasis on less. Which he claimed then decided was the truth about the virus, even if at that point that part of knowledge was inconclusive or turned out wrong later. Sometimes even latching on it even after it turned out wrong.