For those who thinks that the old 208 performed better than this because this got 4 stars and the old got 5, remember that the criteria of EuroNCAP have changed since the time the other one was tested
I was looking at getting one of these. But the other day I seen one that had been rear ended on the motorway and the whole back of the car caved in. Back seats were in the front now I’m thinking twice about how well this car is built!
For the 4 stars . The basic version has only a camera for the avoidance system , result = 56 % BUT the upper version of peugeot 208 have a camera + radar and have 5 stars ! Peugeot just needs to put a camera + radar to have 5 stars on the basic 208.
This is not a competition where the highest score wins, it is about performing generally good security without serious flaws, and Peugeot 208 fails to meet that requirement, how many points it ever gets...
@@Djeseret you don't understand, the problem is only for the avoidance system on the basic 208 working with a camera instead of camera + radar . The chassis has nothing wrong ! I repeat it , the upper versions have a camera + radar for the avoidance pedestrian system and 5 stars
@@Neoptolemus absolutly not, the cabine can absorb a certain mount of power and is allowed to be deformed for preserving the Seat position. Stop being stupid 2 second, if the cabin would have not validate this standard the car wouldn't have a single fucking star.
I got rear ended in my 2021 208 at the road and we were all ok. Very good impact absorption, very resilient structure. All we had to do was weld the rear panel again and align the trunk
@@seeerserious well, the welds are now continuous TIG/MIG, instead of weld points. And it is a new rear panel. I believe overall the results will be similar, just a minimal reduction in the energy absorption
The 208 is as safer as another car, the problem is the avoidance system. This same system that 80% of the five star car customers won’t buy as an option and will finally drive a 4 star car according the Euroncap notation ...
Really strong front end and window struts on the front no intrusion into drivers side of passenger by looks of it to . The front over lap the windscreen didn't even break lol
Show us the G forces, and then we'll talk safe or 4-star rating. The way it collapsed indicates a high amount of absorption and dispersal. Rigidity is misleading
this car have better qualification for passengers and child protection than a Honda jazz with 5 stars but less pedestrian protection including asists in case of accident
I was looking at getting one of these. But the other day I seen one that had been rear ended on the motorway and the whole back of the car caved in. Back seats were in the front now I’m thinking twice about how well this car is built!
Maybe when it hits the soft car thingy 😬 it hit it quiet hard and atfu otfer thing but otfer wise safe well not on the front corner test the driver dummy head went on the railing maybe passenger in writing and watching at the same time
Peugeot is nice but unreliable. Once upon a time a Peugeot 206 fail in the midle of the road and caused a fatal car crash because it was rear ended by a truck
This shitbox not only got 4 stars but it's systems did not avoid crash at 35km/h, only reduce the speed where the Polo achieved avoidance of the crash at 50km/h !! French and Italian cars are lame
no the basic version has 4 stars because the avoidance system works only with a camera but the upper versions have a camera + radar and 5 stars for crash test ...
I had an accident at 118 kilometers per hour in my 208 gti, against a tree and thank god I didn't break anything. Thanks there Peugeot I'm alive
Well, apart from the car I suppose
The 2008 has the same features to
Thank God who saved you
For those who thinks that the old 208 performed better than this because this got 4 stars and the old got 5, remember that the criteria of EuroNCAP have changed since the time the other one was tested
I was looking at getting one of these. But the other day I seen one that had been rear ended on the motorway and the whole back of the car caved in. Back seats were in the front now I’m thinking twice about how well this car is built!
For the 4 stars . The basic version has only a camera for the avoidance system , result = 56 % BUT the upper version of peugeot 208 have a camera + radar and have 5 stars !
Peugeot just needs to put a camera + radar to have 5 stars on the basic 208.
This is not a competition where the highest score wins, it is about performing generally good security without serious flaws, and Peugeot 208 fails to meet that requirement, how many points it ever gets...
@@Djeseret you don't understand, the problem is only for the avoidance system on the basic 208 working with a camera instead of camera + radar . The chassis has nothing wrong !
I repeat it , the upper versions have a camera + radar for the avoidance pedestrian system and 5 stars
@@stephen10. There are many... errors in this car, read PDF facts!
NOT what EuroNcap summarizes...
@@Djeseret oh what are these errors ? you hate peugeot at this point ?
all the upper versions have 5 stars my friend
@@Djeseret "pdf facts" LOL
It's a safe car, Really safe! It is very advanced too, Love it.
.
. NOT, NOT, NOT ... Peuge-NOT.
-
-
@@lopezben3023 ĺ
@@lopezben3023 Why? :)
@@_stoupa2_397 That is a spam bot
Why is everyone going around saying this car ain’t safe cause it don’t have a 5 star rating. 3-4 star rating is still safe. Like god damn
1:54 would you like to be a driver on that car?
@@Neoptolemus yes of course, the shock absorption is ok, what's the probleme ?
stickygaiden this is not simple absorption but deformation of the cabin. The cabin should remain intact and the doors to absorb the impact completely.
@@Neoptolemus absolutly not, the cabine can absorb a certain mount of power and is allowed to be deformed for preserving the Seat position. Stop being stupid 2 second, if the cabin would have not validate this standard the car wouldn't have a single fucking star.
@Neoptolemus dude there is no cabin deformation
Best car I’ve had! alerts me for my braking, when I’m too far up a drivers rear end and not to go on the other side of road without indicating
I got rear ended in my 2021 208 at the road and we were all ok. Very good impact absorption, very resilient structure. All we had to do was weld the rear panel again and align the trunk
Rear passenger doesn't look very safe considering force head and neck took after that first crash...
@@seeerserious well, the welds are now continuous TIG/MIG, instead of weld points. And it is a new rear panel. I believe overall the results will be similar, just a minimal reduction in the energy absorption
The 208 is as safer as another car, the problem is the avoidance system. This same system that 80% of the five star car customers won’t buy as an option and will finally drive a 4 star car according the Euroncap notation ...
Polo got 5 stars and has better rigidity and systems
4 stars is still good not bad like the Honda Civic except that only comes with 4 stars I believe
You mean ADAS is a bad feature? where can I find more info on that?
Its painful to watch this car getting destroyed.
Really strong front end and window struts on the front no intrusion into drivers side of passenger by looks of it to . The front over lap the windscreen didn't even break lol
Show us the G forces, and then we'll talk safe or 4-star rating. The way it collapsed indicates a high amount of absorption and dispersal. Rigidity is misleading
.
. NOT, NOT, NOT ... Peuge-NOT.
-
-
I want to see the electric one performing, especially the side pole crash. How the battery does protect?
I hate Peugeot but damn. The car is safe. I'm impressed
The design of this 208 in "base" or access version is more close to the spirit of the 205 .
It s not the case on ths previous 208
this car have better qualification for passengers and child protection than a Honda jazz with 5 stars but less pedestrian protection including asists in case of accident
Acceptable rating
I was looking at getting one of these. But the other day I seen one that had been rear ended on the motorway and the whole back of the car caved in. Back seats were in the front now I’m thinking twice about how well this car is built!
Can they do Vinfast?
Looking by the structure, it's safe for a small car
Maybe when it hits the soft car thingy 😬 it hit it quiet hard and atfu otfer thing but otfer wise safe well not on the front corner test the driver dummy head went on the railing maybe passenger in writing and watching at the same time
A car in 2019 with incandescent bulb in the blinkers. Sometimes it´s unbelivable.
Markus Brandhuber this is basic version
Its an economy car, who cares about the details
@@gky3019 20k for an economy car 🤔
@@Dude29 these day it's on the lower end
5:43:45
What happens to the crashed cars
They sell them to gypsies, so that they disassemble them into spare parts for the black market.
@@LucaScarpellini3d lol. Andy England 🇬🇧👍
Why test a version that will not be sold in most Western markets? It is EuroNCAP headline grabbing again.
Renault clio
so to get 5 stars the car has to destroy the entire facility
Music?
Creo que no es un coche seguro porque mirad 0:55 el airbag conductor con sangre
What's the song name??
I wanna know too, it's bad ass.
what is?
X4
Song
I see really safe car
2ye bölünmüyor en azından sjjsjs
I saw a safe car
Safe? Yeh ... reliable? Not even close
Port port
حتى البيجو جاتها عدوى الشبك الكبير 🤦😆😂😂😂😂💔
Je pensais que la 208 aurait 5 étoiles ⭐️ !!!!
Peugeot se contente t-il de 4 étoiles ? 😡
C’est parce que le freinage d’urgence est en option chez Peugeot c’est pour cela que la clio 5 à 5 étoiles
0:40
Dont buy a car unless it has 5*.
That’s not true bro. 3-4 star rating cars are still safe plus most of your daily drivers that are around 10-30k aren’t 5 stars but still safe.
Okay, will keep my 15 years old 5 star car....
@Elling Olsen what car is it?
Why risk you and your family in anything less?
@@ellingolsen3194 this Peugeot is much safer, if they tested your 5 star car now it would be lucky to get 1 star
4☆No
FRENCH ENGINEERING
shouid be minimum 100 kmh
🚗😱
Thoughs dummy's just can't drive
S A F E
.
. NOT, NOT, NOT ... Peuge-NOT.
-
-
Very stupid music.
🚧🆚🚗
Peugeot is nice but unreliable. Once upon a time a Peugeot 206 fail in the midle of the road and caused a fatal car crash because it was rear ended by a truck
3008 and 5008 both got awards for being most dependable car in their classes in eh UK giving Peugeut most dependable brand award this year.
NO SAFE
What a dangerous car, seats broke and kids are flying around🙄
2 star Max but due to some fake safety 4 stars , incredible in 2019.
Is not safety car😱😱😱😱😱😱
This shitbox not only got 4 stars but it's systems did not avoid crash at 35km/h, only reduce the speed where the Polo achieved avoidance of the crash at 50km/h !! French and Italian cars are lame
The Clio 5 is literally the safest car in its category now, so...
@@netako Yes it is. Both Polo and Clio are FAR superior then this shitbox 208
Have you seen VW cars performing the moose test?Total garbage.
@@dickn.ormous1064 What are you talking about ??? POLO performs it at faster speed then the 208!!!
you‘re so annoying omg
VW >>>>> Peugeot
Natan Minardi peugeot > wv diesel gate
Nope
Weazel News. Yes
@@killian7898 So yes then
@@killian7898 old news
Horrible!!!
no the basic version has 4 stars because the avoidance system works only with a camera but the upper versions have a camera + radar and 5 stars for crash test ...
How is this horrible??
He is a Vag fanboy, what were you expecting?