I'm sure their legal advisers know precisely what the law is. They are just choosing to ignore it and issue a "policy" down to each NT property that states NT properties are "no fly" areas and this gets told to visitors. It does not follow the drone laws, but they know the vast majority of visitors will conform with what they say rather than make a scene.
@@84homey This is a paragraph copied and pasted from a solicitor’s website dated this year Airborne activities: Unauthorised flying of, for example, drones over your property at low heights may also be considered trespassing, especially if it interferes with your quiet enjoyment of your land. Although it doesn’t specify a height
@@barryabell5410 He's a never been a lawyer in his entire life. He's sat in a hut with a walkie-talkie wearing a polyester uniform citing laws he clearly knows nothing about. He has an inferiority complex which is why he felt compelled to state he was a lawyer in a ridiculous attempt to try and overpower DJE when in reality he's a security guard.
We cancelled our NT memberships a few years ago. They have been captured by woke ideology and they now operate with an authoritarian vibe. There are many places where you can access on public footpaths, even Stonehenge. NT operated perfectly well for decades before they became political.
They don't like people flying drones because people will view the footage for free instead of visiting and paying through the nose while having to deal with arrogant staff.
Google AI says: _The National Trust does not grant permission for private drone flying on their properties and land. The National Trust's reasons for this include the value their members and visitors place on the tranquility of their properties._ An actual adice site says: _The regulations governing airspace ownership in the UK are under the purview of the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and adhere to international laws. Consequently, the National Trust does not have the ability to regulate or restrict the use of airspace over its properties ._
Please don't take anything AI says as legalese. If you type into Google : "You don't need a licence to fly a drone over an English Heritage site" See what answer the AI gives you and then take out the word don't and see what answer you now get!! In fact the answer you get when you take the word don't out doesn't even make sense!! AI can NEVER be relied upon to give a correct answer here. Ever.
I have to say that final man you talked to was quite amazing. Actually knowledgeable, stated that he was going to address the misinformation from his team, and respected your rights.
He's someone pretty much like most of us that watch these vids and learned the law correctly. He knew he had every right to fly over. And thats all we need people learning the law especially if they are there to enforce it.
It actually wouldn't be stealing to confiscate something if it were to land on their grounds. If it were to crash then they would have the right to take the person to court and apply for damages to the property. I'm sure he's completely insured though and probably for up to £5 million or maybe even more so that wouldn't be a problem. Threatening to destroy his drone and actually carrying that out though, that would be illegal.
JAN is the supercomputer that controls all international aviation. JAN is all around us, in the air that we breathe and in the water that quenches our thirst. Praise be to JAN, goddess of world heritage
JAN was named by a gimpo w a degree employed by 'ParkAir' a subsiduary of Nothrup-Grumman... [ yeah, killer drones _et al_ ] _'Do you want to go further_ Pick red or blue. [ was with the mother-in-law of someone trying to find a 'name' for the new aviation software to replace all civil AND Military aviation in the next few years... ]
give a man a fish and he will feed himself for a day, give him a fishing rod he will feed himself for life. Give a man a national trust polo shirt and he will turn onto an old woman
Jan just makes her own life difficult by having drone flyers having to get permission off her. When she's already busy, adding yet more tasks to her role just to make herself even more important, will just mean that drone flyers don't get any reasonable service, and she just get overworked. She is a stupid bureaucrat.
If I was that ex lawyer I would do everything possible to get this video taken down! If one person who know him sees it the will all see have truly thick he is!
Would be interesting to go back in a month and see if they are now educated. I don't know why but it was tge old woman interfering that annoyed me most, these types allways appear to be the worst I thinking they are allways right and will not accept being told they are not like age gives them the right to behave badly and dictate to others even if it's wrong. I bet she was on a community council somewhere and the locals were sick of her bossing everyone around with little knowledge.
I have delivered here numerous times and thought it was lovely but to see it from above is fantastic thank you for showing us national trust from above
Tim i prefer you do not extort money from the public to view our national heritage . the reason NT does not allow photography is coz you are a greedy corporate company that looks down its nose at the public .
rather than being a greedy corporate company, they are a charity that maintains buildings (often gifted to the Trust by the family owners), maintain the coastline and pastureland and even villages. For a small annual charge you can visit all these wonderful places. I think they perform a wonderful service to the populus.
"I used to be a lawyer" no solicitor or barrister says lawyer. People who say 'lawyer' are people who managed to get a law degree (basic principles) but who never fulfilled their career dreams.
From a previous dealing with English Heritage site - Kenilworth Castle they want £500 to give you the permission to fly over there site - I declined there offer
"I used to be a Lawyer, and I believe it is completely legal for someone to take your stuff without your permission, and that is why I'm not a Lawyer anymore. Murder? Yes, that's legal as well..." 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's apparently clear all these National Trust employees need educating on drone law and that their policies do not apply to members of the public that are not on their land and even more importantly, they do not control the airspace above with their damn policies. I will take your drone if I see it and maybe destroy it" Who the Hell does he think he is🤔 above the law possibly, rude man upset you wasn't doing as he said..
Maybe and maybe not Airborne activities: Unauthorised flying of, for example, drones over your property at low heights may also be considered trespassing, especially if it interferes with your quiet enjoyment of your land. From a solicitor’s website
@@macsmith6216 Perhaps the solicitors website would be better advised researching and confirming actual, factual legalization before posting vague statements online?
@macsmith 6216😂😂 oh you are clueless too🤡 maybe look into the law on drone flying for a little education. The only possible offence would be flying low looking into people's windows or say perving on residents sunbathing naked etc, but even flying over somebody's property, even if that somebody is doing whatever in their garden cannot be considered an offence, unless you're ĺow and staying there filming residential 🤦♂️🤡
If the NT could find a way of charging a fee for flying drones over their sites they'd be inviting every man and his dog to do so. They don't like it because they can't control it and make money from it.
That robertashworth1285 is the best answer,(above most of the bullshit written on this NT place) but what a gathering of very strange people, THEY ARE DEFINITELY NOT ALL LOCKED UP YET, how have this lot got away with it, someone must have the answer ?.
When I bought my house, it was on the condition that I own the vertical space above all the way to the moon. I've been trying to get on to someone about that International Space Station that keeps trespassing.
The idiot in the shed claiming that the NT can take possession of property and keep it or destroy it they will be subject to The Theft Act 1968 if they refused to return it to the owner. NT policy does not negate legislation and the staff need to be educated on the law. The attitude of staff shows why I do not subscribe to NT.
But I bet even as an EX Solicitor he knows that once a Business has been LIQUIDATED It no Longer has it's History and must start as a Totally New Club with a New Name (ie) The Rangers Newco 5088/2012 Barman we'll have a TREBLE 🏆🏆🏆 🍺🍾🍸 🇮🇪💚🍀😎
@@joecmccluskey I suppose he would also know all about "Seperate entities" And wether the victims have a claim or not, talking about that, the judgement is due soon....Tick tock. 😉
Like a comment I read. I've done the same thing, cancelled N.T. membership, and don't visit and pay silly prices, they are already net assets worth £1.7bn. and expect people to volunteer.
What intrigues me about auditor videos is the psychology behind some of the interactions. With the employees, confidence and making laws and rules up is more valuable than knowledge. Owning 10,000' feet up in the air, CAA have no responsibility... embarrassing.
Miss Marple bless her...the way you interacted with her was so lovely 😊 You are like a dog with a bone and get results as shown in this video, I hope you do more National Trust sites and break a few more barriers down 😊
The young girl in the reception started to realise how stupid and wrong her argument was when he mentioned helicopters and she said only military 😂😂😂 and them started stumbling her word when he said airpanes😂😂😂
Karen rules about the drones: 1.drones not allowed on site without permission. 2. you need to have a license to fly a drone 3. private property extends for 10000 feet 4. to get the permission you need to complete the route through the channels
Brilliant this one DJE love the way you get to them, best content on UA-cam lately you are heading to be no. 1. All other auditor's need to learn from you. Make sure they use the correct oil in your car that can cause core plugs and things to blow out
Don’t look at our grass it’s green ,we got some stones there grey but you can’t look at them those sheep are blessed you can’t watch them ,this building made of brick but you can’t see that. Give me £50 I let you see all the same shit we see every day😂😂😂😂
Not sure how it works in the UK but in the USA, our equivalent of the CAA , the FAA, regulates ALLLLLLL airspace. The emphasis on ALL is added because they've clarified even if it's an inch above your garden, it's still regulated by the FAA (unless it's an enclosed space with a roof). Also, shooting down a drone will bring you federal charges just as shooting at an airplane or helicopter would.
I was at Avebury manor 1 day when they were filming a Flymo advert. It was quite funny watching them cut lovely stripes into the lawn using a old Suffolk punch and then carrying the Flymo into place.
Tim was a true professional, level headed, open-minded, polite. Shed-dweller was yet another example of the sort of pompous nonsensemonger we need less of in this nation.
Loving the drone footage, on this one. I've spent a few holidays, in Wiltshire and it's beautiful, so it's great to see it from a different perspective.
Jan appears to be never able to be contacted, and is always ‘away’ doing important business… hmmm, I think someone high up needs to put tracker on Jan, just to be sure she’s actually doing what she’s paid to do.
Here in Australia the drone regulations and the laws around filming of private property are much stricter than in the UK. Exercise your rights and freedoms and don’t let them slip away.
There is a stone circle on Ilkley moor where lots of people go for the solstice. I ran past on my way to work on one such occasion and surprised a guy having a dump by a style, don’t know who was the more surprised ! I didn’t see him on my way back though ! Lovely scenery where you are on this video. That Tim was a sensible guy at least.
I nearly pissed myself within the first minute once that fella mentioned he was a lawyer. Anyway, don't we have solicitors and barristers in this country?
Well I can understànd why he WAS a lawyer. His lack of knowege about who controls the airspace shows. Aparently the ex lawyer thinks its OK to distroy petsonal property as well. Discusting.
"I used to be a lawyer. But I was shite at it so I now work selling tickets at the national Trust."
😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂
And he's sprouting absolute bs .... 😂
But he does have a rainbow lanyard, just say it identifies as a bird.
He once appealed a parking ticket.
Wow it’s frightening to think the national trust think they know the law on drones. They haven’t got a FKN clue. How embarrassing for them.
They actually do , you obviously don't !
I'm sure their legal advisers know precisely what the law is. They are just choosing to ignore it and issue a "policy" down to each NT property that states NT properties are "no fly" areas and this gets told to visitors. It does not follow the drone laws, but they know the vast majority of visitors will conform with what they say rather than make a scene.
@@84homey
This is a paragraph copied and pasted from a solicitor’s website dated this year
Airborne activities: Unauthorised flying of, for example, drones over your property at low heights may also be considered trespassing, especially if it interferes with your quiet enjoyment of your land.
Although it doesn’t specify a height
@@macsmith6216 I would not be at all surprised if the law was further tightened up on drone flying in the future.
@@macsmith6216maximum 500ft ... Referred to as the *lower stratum*
With that level of legal knowledge, I'm not surprised that the "lawyer" is working at a National Trust site. 😂
👍🤣😂
Ex lawyer for a reason 🤣🤣🤣
@@barryabell5410 He's a never been a lawyer in his entire life. He's sat in a hut with a walkie-talkie wearing a polyester uniform citing laws he clearly knows nothing about. He has an inferiority complex which is why he felt compelled to state he was a lawyer in a ridiculous attempt to try and overpower DJE when in reality he's a security guard.
This is dictatorial attitude is exactly why I stopped my membership to the NT.
I stopped mine because of all their ridiculous woke policies!
We cancelled our NT memberships a few years ago. They have been captured by woke ideology and they now operate with an authoritarian vibe. There are many places where you can access on public footpaths, even Stonehenge. NT operated perfectly well for decades before they became political.
I very much doubt that you'll be missed 🤓
@@arr0wfree855And if you unsubscribe here you won’t be missed either. Touché
@@arr0wfree855If you unsubscribe, I doubt you’ll be missed either. Touché.
They don't like people flying drones because people will view the footage for free instead of visiting and paying through the nose while having to deal with arrogant staff.
It's much like everything these days regarding money. I always follow the money regarding political policies and i always come to the right conclusion
Bang on - they are also terrified of members of public claiming against them
Google AI says:
_The National Trust does not grant permission for private drone flying on their properties and land. The National Trust's reasons for this include the value their members and visitors place on the tranquility of their properties._
An actual adice site says:
_The regulations governing airspace ownership in the UK are under the purview of the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and adhere to international laws. Consequently, the National Trust does not have the ability to regulate or restrict the use of airspace over its properties ._
"on their properties and land" - that means FROM their properties and land.
Nice one Philip 🫡
@@deehaytch8442basic property rights 😂 they just havent been told "you cant" so they keep saying it.
Like most they interpret what they think instead of what is actually stated. 😂 Like the word could doesn't mean it will happen 😊
Please don't take anything AI says as legalese. If you type into Google :
"You don't need a licence to fly a drone over an English Heritage site"
See what answer the AI gives you and then take out the word don't and see what answer you now get!!
In fact the answer you get when you take the word don't out doesn't even make sense!!
AI can NEVER be relied upon to give a correct answer here. Ever.
He used to be a lawyer , whilst he is clearly playing pocket billiards
And loosing badly?
@@TeannCoffee haha it doesn't know the difference between lose and loose
I have to say that final man you talked to was quite amazing. Actually knowledgeable, stated that he was going to address the misinformation from his team, and respected your rights.
He's someone pretty much like most of us that watch these vids and learned the law correctly. He knew he had every right to fly over. And thats all we need people learning the law especially if they are there to enforce it.
Jan, please inform your staff that it's not illegal. As you are making them look stupid.
He could be done for stealing, do you want to sack a thief.
It actually wouldn't be stealing to confiscate something if it were to land on their grounds. If it were to crash then they would have the right to take the person to court and apply for damages to the property. I'm sure he's completely insured though and probably for up to £5 million or maybe even more so that wouldn't be a problem.
Threatening to destroy his drone and actually carrying that out though, that would be illegal.
Failing your law degree doesn't make you a lawyer.
Don't you mean failing your A Level in Law
😂 your right it makes you work for national trust 😂 half his lies aren't true ffs 😂😂😂
I think he probably saved up coupons from the side of cereal boxes to send off for a plastic badge saying "I'm a lawyer". 😂
JAN is the supercomputer that controls all international aviation. JAN is all around us, in the air that we breathe and in the water that quenches our thirst. Praise be to JAN, goddess of world heritage
JAN was named by a gimpo w a degree employed by 'ParkAir' a subsiduary of Nothrup-Grumman... [ yeah, killer drones _et al_ ]
_'Do you want to go further_
Pick red or blue.
[ was with the mother-in-law of someone trying to find a 'name' for the new aviation software to replace all civil AND Military aviation in the next few years... ]
20 years ago...
starting to wonder if Jan actually exists!!??
Computer (Jan) says no....
😂😂😂@@Theratman62
Well I didn’t know the CAA don’t control the air space 😂😂😂 what a muppet. I bet he feels such a plonker
last guy was a credit to the trust
give a man a fish and he will feed himself for a day, give him a fishing rod he will feed himself for life. Give a man a national trust polo shirt and he will turn onto an old woman
Jan just makes her own life difficult by having drone flyers having to get permission off her. When she's already busy, adding yet more tasks to her role just to make herself even more important, will just mean that drone flyers don't get any reasonable service, and she just get overworked. She is a stupid bureaucrat.
Jans ex military in charge of multiple heritage sites….
Says it all… 👀
And theres the reason he is an ex lawyer. What a fool.
If I was that ex lawyer I would do everything possible to get this video taken down! If one person who know him sees it the will all see have truly thick he is!
Would be interesting to go back in a month and see if they are now educated. I don't know why but it was tge old woman interfering that annoyed me most, these types allways appear to be the worst I thinking they are allways right and will not accept being told they are not like age gives them the right to behave badly and dictate to others even if it's wrong. I bet she was on a community council somewhere and the locals were sick of her bossing everyone around with little knowledge.
i know him , he was never a lawyer 😂
I have delivered here numerous times and thought it was lovely but to see it from above is fantastic thank you for showing us national trust from above
Tim i prefer you do not extort money from the public to view our national heritage . the reason NT does not allow photography is coz you are a greedy corporate company that looks down its nose at the public .
rather than being a greedy corporate company, they are a charity that maintains buildings (often gifted to the Trust by the family owners), maintain the coastline and pastureland and even villages. For a small annual charge you can visit all these wonderful places. I think they perform a wonderful service to the populus.
@@mikeowen1819 Like all corporate they have staff that will blindly say anything to earn a pat on the head from thier masters .
@@mikeowen1819 yeah it’s called Robbery
@@JohnfromEnglandIt's a charity.
All charities are in it for the money and perks.
threats of theft are still threats of theft.
threats to destroy property is the same.
bUt i arE lawYaR.🥴
A threat to steal is not a theft. You have to feloniously take the property into your possession, or control, to constitute a theft.
The “lawyer” is an utter tool. Also how does granny keep popping up?
That trust man is a breath of fresh air, well done Mr trusty
I think they do genuinely believe they have a no-fly zone above their property... Which is really odd.
That one bloke genuinely believes that if a plane crashes in his back garden he gets to keep it! 😂 Mental.
He was a lawyer but now sits in a garden shed all day.
The brainwashed woke NT .... 😕
That old dude at the 1 hour mark was awesome! Can't believe he's watching DJ Audits on TikTok lmao 🤣
I WAS a lawyer but lost most cases due to my utter ignorance, I then got a job as tea boy and door man with the National Trust.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
He's a bigger lawyer than Billy Lawyer...utter fool
The rainbow lanyard speaks volumes.
Needs a mass audit with drone flights all day.
Tim was a pretty nice gentleman who seemed to know the law, unlike the majority of the staff
Lets be fair she wasnt a nice old lady she was a crow 🤣
She was a silly old bat (Allo Allo)
Yes she was a silly old bat
"I used to be a lawyer" no solicitor or barrister says lawyer. People who say 'lawyer' are people who managed to get a law degree (basic principles) but who never fulfilled their career dreams.
From a previous dealing with English Heritage site - Kenilworth Castle they want £500 to give you the permission to fly over there site - I declined there offer
Hope you flew from outside in a public place then over theirs to prove the point. 😮
For some reason anyone in charge of anything is never available.
When will the national trust learn?
The guys in charge know full well. They are being deliberately dishonest. It's disgusting behaviour from a supposedly reputable organisation.
DJE has found a new neich...and i love it !! ❤
Niche
Kneesh*
@@Josh-eb5vm 🤣
The smug look on the face of the guy around 25 minutes, you can feel his elation at telling you “Not allowed” 😂
"I used to be a Lawyer, and I believe it is completely legal for someone to take your stuff without your permission, and that is why I'm not a Lawyer anymore. Murder? Yes, that's legal as well..." 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's apparently clear all these National Trust employees need educating on drone law and that their policies do not apply to members of the public that are not on their land and even more importantly, they do not control the airspace above with their damn policies. I will take your drone if I see it and maybe destroy it" Who the Hell does he think he is🤔 above the law possibly, rude man upset you wasn't doing as he said..
Maybe and maybe not
Airborne activities: Unauthorised flying of, for example, drones over your property at low heights may also be considered trespassing, especially if it interferes with your quiet enjoyment of your land.
From a solicitor’s website
@@macsmith6216 Perhaps the solicitors website would be better advised researching and confirming actual, factual legalization before posting vague statements online?
@macsmith 6216😂😂 oh you are clueless too🤡 maybe look into the law on drone flying for a little education. The only possible offence would be flying low looking into people's windows or say perving on residents sunbathing naked etc, but even flying over somebody's property, even if that somebody is doing whatever in their garden cannot be considered an offence, unless you're ĺow and staying there filming residential 🤦♂️🤡
I think it’s safe to say, anyone wearing a rainbow lanyard is highly likely to be talking utter bilge.
That bloke is a real lefty creepy odd ball
what is that supposed to mean as it is the flag of the lgbtq you are being homophobic
@@colinscott7478 it means that imo, people that wear a rainbow lanyard are virtue signalling lefties = highly likely to be talking utter bilge. Hth.
Well said
Don't you believe your own ears !!@@colinscott7478
If the NT could find a way of charging a fee for flying drones over their sites they'd be inviting every man and his dog to do so. They don't like it because they can't control it and make money from it.
That robertashworth1285 is the best answer,(above most of the bullshit written on this NT place) but what a gathering of very strange people, THEY ARE DEFINITELY NOT ALL LOCKED UP YET, how have this lot got away with it, someone must have the answer ?.
When I bought my house, it was on the condition that I own the vertical space above all the way to the moon. I've been trying to get on to someone about that International Space Station that keeps trespassing.
😂😂😂😂
Love it 🤣🤣🤣
even the lawer doesn't understand the difference between policy and law
I seriously doubt that guy was really a lawyer.
He would be perfect for the police.
Bet he's regretting the lawyer line. What a complete fool
Ex lawyer is clueless, no wonder he is EX !
A thatched roof will last up to 40 years with correct maintenance, the ridges generally need changing every 10-15 years
I was a lawyer and now I’m just an idiot.
0:29 "I was a lawyer before I started working here"... Everyone was an expert on something before they ended up working a lower position... BS.
The idiot in the shed claiming that the NT can take possession of property and keep it or destroy it they will be subject to The Theft Act 1968 if they refused to return it to the owner. NT policy does not negate legislation and the staff need to be educated on the law. The attitude of staff shows why I do not subscribe to NT.
The one time Chairman of National Trust was also the Chairman of the Post Office, is it any surprise what we see here. Complete fools.
A thatched roofs lifespan is between 15-40 years.
Thanks for google-ing that, saved me from doing it.
@@CushtyCrow no problem babes just obv it wasnt 3 years.
No wonder he is no longer a lawyer, he makes stuff up! 😂 maybe he made up that he used to be a lawyer as well…..
The operative word is WAS, 😂😂😂
He used to be a lawyer and he still comes out with utter shite 😂.
The amazing thing is he is not ashamed to let everyone see how far he has fallen in the world.
Oh dear, maybe that is why he is an EX solicitor.
But I bet even as an EX Solicitor he knows that once a Business has been LIQUIDATED
It no Longer has it's History and must start as a Totally New Club with a New Name (ie)
The Rangers Newco 5088/2012
Barman we'll have a TREBLE
🏆🏆🏆
🍺🍾🍸
🇮🇪💚🍀😎
@@joecmccluskey I suppose he would also know all about "Seperate entities" And wether the victims have a claim or not, talking about that, the judgement is due soon....Tick tock. 😉
Is he now on work experience, trying to rebuild his life?
Like a comment I read. I've done the same thing, cancelled N.T. membership, and don't visit and pay silly prices, they are already net assets worth £1.7bn. and expect people to volunteer.
What intrigues me about auditor videos is the psychology behind some of the interactions. With the employees, confidence and making laws and rules up is more valuable than knowledge. Owning 10,000' feet up in the air, CAA have no responsibility... embarrassing.
Heard some people talk bullshite in my day but this takes the biscuit 😂
Jan has a cushy job, she never seems to be at work and when she is she's not available 😮😂 I want her job
To be fair she's often a bit busy creating world peace and advising the Pope. She also has a hand in Tesla technology 👍
@@shivaunt71 😂😂😂🍻
Miss Marple bless her...the way you interacted with her was so lovely 😊
You are like a dog with a bone and get results as shown in this video, I hope you do more National Trust sites and break a few more barriers down 😊
Threatening to destroy private property. Disgusting.
pure tribal hooliganism, covered in high street clothes.
The young girl in the reception started to realise how stupid and wrong her argument was when he mentioned helicopters and she said only military 😂😂😂 and them started stumbling her word when he said airpanes😂😂😂
We had a bloke at work like Les his nickname was Bullshit
Karen rules about the drones: 1.drones not allowed on site without permission. 2. you need to have a license to fly a drone 3. private property extends for 10000 feet 4. to get the permission you need to complete the route through the channels
4. Legal staff work out of a small shed by the entrance adhere to their sage council at all times.
Miss Marples needs to stick to solving crime.
Brilliant haha
Beautiful vision of Avebury by drone. Many thanks. Last time I was there on ground level was 1976.
Fair play to Tim, he knew his stuff and wasn't another useless tool of the NT
0:00 I was slapping my head right from the start. How can so many people be so utterly stupid.
It’s stupid to slap your head too, to be fair 😂
@@CushtyCrownot if he enjoys it 👍
Takes one to know one
Don’t excuse a rude violent lady. Don’t make excuses for a horrible women.
He went from "I'm not the expert" to very confidently talking a load of rubbish in a very short space of time.
There is a "type" that work for and especially volunteer for the national trust
Remainer, Labour supporting Free Palestine types 😁
@@shivaunt71 more likely Lib Dem
@@johndukes2284 Yeah probably John 👍
The kind who identify as a wet lettuce.
Many of them are like "nan", only she was too extreme even for them to use.Did her psychiatrist know that she was out on her own?
“Back to work”
Always ruffles the feathers 😂😂😂😂
Because it takes there perceived authority over you away from them and enforces your authority over them.
37:17 “I’m not an expert “ 😆 you don’t say
Brilliant this one DJE love the way you get to them, best content on UA-cam lately you are heading to be no. 1. All other auditor's need to learn from you. Make sure they use the correct oil in your car that can cause core plugs and things to blow out
Lawyer my arse he don't know his arse from his elbow because he would no if he was a lawyer you can not take people's property what a muppet
35:00 The lawyer needs to read up on his case law. Specifically BERNSTEIN OF LEIGH (BARON) v. SKYVIEWS & GENERAL LTD. [1975 B. No. 6333]
"Back to work Les" 😂😂
He went back to work and was told his job is in jeopardy!!
Auditors assemble - on this place!
The old girl with the walking stick will annihilate them all 😄
That’s my saying don’t pinch it.
Don’t look at our grass it’s green ,we got some stones there grey but you can’t look at them those sheep are blessed you can’t watch them ,this building made of brick but you can’t see that.
Give me £50 I let you see all the same shit we see every day😂😂😂😂
Not sure how it works in the UK but in the USA, our equivalent of the CAA , the FAA, regulates ALLLLLLL airspace. The emphasis on ALL is added because they've clarified even if it's an inch above your garden, it's still regulated by the FAA (unless it's an enclosed space with a roof). Also, shooting down a drone will bring you federal charges just as shooting at an airplane or helicopter would.
It's the same in the UK. The airspace used for these small drones are Class G, and Class G goes from the ground up to the next class.
No longer a lawyer as he wasn’t competent
I was at Avebury manor 1 day when they were filming a Flymo advert. It was quite funny watching them cut lovely stripes into the lawn using a old Suffolk punch and then carrying the Flymo into place.
I just Googled a Suffolk Punch and recognised it immediately. My dad had one. Now going for £500 on eBay!
@@shivaunt71 that's how i know what it was. My dad had 1.
Tim was a true professional, level headed, open-minded, polite. Shed-dweller was yet another example of the sort of pompous nonsensemonger we need less of in this nation.
“If we find it. We will destroy it”. 😂
I’m sure he heard that from Tony Blair.
Well done for proving the facts ,love it .The two older guys new their stuff
I don't think Jan exists
My jaw dropped what an entitled w ⚓.😂 He lies like my ex, lawyer 😂😂 CAA no fly zone 😂😂 absolute knobs
Loving the drone footage, on this one. I've spent a few holidays, in Wiltshire and it's beautiful, so it's great to see it from a different perspective.
Jan appears to be never able to be contacted, and is always ‘away’ doing important business… hmmm, I think someone high up needs to put tracker on Jan, just to be sure she’s actually doing what she’s paid to do.
Jan is 'M' from James Bond...😅😅😅😅
I was chatting to someone from Australia, and she said, Why is The UK is so anti drones?
says someone from 'Australia' where all of the major cities and general civilisation is 'around the edge' with nothing but Uluru in the centre...
Here in Australia the drone regulations and the laws around filming of private property are much stricter than in the UK.
Exercise your rights and freedoms and don’t let them slip away.
Arent they stricter here in Australia?
He must have been one hell of a shit lawyer that's all i can say. 😆😆😆
There is a stone circle on Ilkley moor where lots of people go for the solstice. I ran past on my way to work on one such occasion and surprised a guy having a dump by a style, don’t know who was the more surprised ! I didn’t see him on my way back though ! Lovely scenery where you are on this video. That Tim was a sensible guy at least.
Old people, they believe anyone with a uniform on 😂
"No can do...!"
Translates as: "We don't want you to, but there is f*ck all we can do about it if you do..." 🤣🤣🤣
I nearly pissed myself within the first minute once that fella mentioned he was a lawyer. Anyway, don't we have solicitors and barristers in this country?
Great vid DJE! Flexing the rights of a drone pilot.
Well I can understànd why he WAS a lawyer. His lack of knowege about who controls the airspace shows. Aparently the ex lawyer thinks its OK to distroy petsonal property as well. Discusting.
Mr Lawer is Mr Liar! He is talking crap! total crap. He is a Jobs worth...and Lovely Nanny Karen! lol
“The CAA don’t control the airspace” - an expert
😂😂😂😂
Mr Lawyer is Mr Loser
I think maybe he was called away from his little booth because his trousers caught fire.
I hear the word Jan, and I quiver. So scary! Glad I don’t give a penny to the national trust or to Jan.
😂 52:47 a geriatric fart escaping through lycra 😂
After all of that chat, she still does not understand the law, PHEW.
Used to be a lawyer.
Hmm I wonder why he isn't one any more? Could it be because he has no idea at all of what he's talking about?