@@paulopeinado404 The thing is, compare to Full frame, M system is poor in low light. if I were to shoot, concerts and thigh in budget, I would buy second hand Full frame camera and a 70-200 f2.8 . if money is not a problem a camera body with Ibis, like r5 and a 70-200 f2.8 with image stabilization. However Day time , M6 II and 55-200 are very good.
Hey, Jeff. Based upon your excellent, simple, straightforward review, I am now planning to buy this lens. You have a way of making things easier to understand for beginners. Just signed up for your channel. Thanks again for your terrific, informative video.
Hey Chris, I'm glad my video was able to give you the value you needed to make a final decision! Thank you for your kind words and I greatly appreciate your feedback. Also look forward to seeing you more on this channel 😁
Please check out Tamron 18-200mm vc efm, it is definitely a hidden gem. It is my go to travel lens, you just can’t go wrong with a lens that cover so much range.
I have another video on this channel that demonstrated the difference in quality between the two ua-cam.com/video/Uw2lmCAJxpQ/v-deo.html In regards to your first question, this video only covered the Canon lenses shown in the video.
I can demonstrate the picture difference betweenthe two. As for the video example, that is already in this video. Is there anything more specific you're looking for with the video example?
55-250 ef-s STM is much better optically, gets far better bokeh and better stabilised. You also just tend to leave the adapter attached to the lens so it's a silly argument. That being said the 55-200 is much smaller and may be easier to add to a bag if you're unsure you'll need it.
Thanks for your insight, would’ve loved to see some examples of video comparison
Thanks for this! You're the only video I found that's comparing these two. Glad I saw this before buying.
I'm glad you saw it too 😁👍
I also bought the 55-200mm ef-m lens . It is great quality and super light weight. For sure it is one of the best ef-m lenses
How does it perform in low light? I'm thinking on getting one for concert photography
@@paulopeinado404 The thing is, compare to Full frame, M system is poor in low light. if I were to shoot, concerts and thigh in budget, I would buy second hand Full frame camera and a 70-200 f2.8 . if money is not a problem a camera body with Ibis, like r5 and a 70-200 f2.8 with image stabilization. However Day time , M6 II and 55-200 are very good.
umm... why don't you just leave the adapter on the 75-300?
Hey, Jeff. Based upon your excellent, simple, straightforward review, I am now planning to buy this lens. You have a way of making things easier to understand for beginners. Just signed up for your channel. Thanks again for your terrific, informative video.
Hey Chris, I'm glad my video was able to give you the value you needed to make a final decision! Thank you for your kind words and I greatly appreciate your feedback. Also look forward to seeing you more on this channel 😁
Please check out Tamron 18-200mm vc efm, it is definitely a hidden gem.
It is my go to travel lens, you just can’t go wrong with a lens that cover so much range.
When I can get my hands on that lens I'll definitely make a video on it 😄
do you need an adapter for Tamron?
Excellent review. I’m sad there was no any sample photos & footages
Thanks! No samples of pictures in this one because the focus was for recording videos. I included samples of both lenses in this video for reference.
Great, love your explanation easy to understand great job
Thanks! Glad the video was helpful 👍
EFM 55-200 VS EFS 55-250 IS STM Which Is Better?
what is your camera?
@@rgsu5559which would you suggest for the m50 mark ii?
@@OmarioRicketts efm
Ever heard of Deity Microphones? Take a listen to a sound comparison of their best microphones! ua-cam.com/video/YXJMkj8ZvoY/v-deo.html
Hello, what would you recommend for a macro lens for close up beauty shots?
I would definitely recommend the Canon EFS 18-55 mm lens. The lens is great at focusing on subjects really close to the camera. amzn.to/43dUMoR
the best zoom on the ef-m 55-200 or the 10x zoom on the samsung 23 ultra? Also where is the quality better?
I have another video on this channel that demonstrated the difference in quality between the two ua-cam.com/video/Uw2lmCAJxpQ/v-deo.html
In regards to your first question, this video only covered the Canon lenses shown in the video.
I've preorder already the lens more for videos
Awesome! 😁👍
is the Canon 55-200 mm EF-M Lens compatible with the Canon M50 Eos?
Yes! It should be because both are EF-M lenses.
can you compare the image different between 200mm and 300mm?
Are you asking for a photo demonstration rather than a video demonstration?
@@jeffreyhackmedia can you compare both image and video? I love to make event videos and take nature image
I can demonstrate the picture difference betweenthe two. As for the video example, that is already in this video. Is there anything more specific you're looking for with the video example?
What about the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM ?
I can make a video on that lens when I'm able to get it.
55-250 ef-s STM is much better optically, gets far better bokeh and better stabilised. You also just tend to leave the adapter attached to the lens so it's a silly argument. That being said the 55-200 is much smaller and may be easier to add to a bag if you're unsure you'll need it.
There is no sample shots for this lens
0:19-0:34 where are the bodies
Sorry, but I'm confused by your question.
❤❤
😁😁