I ain't picky, I like all 3 of them. All 3 of those names have been around a very long time and to me each one has it's own unique respect. God bless the Big 3!
@@cjeljefe7480 they all get about the same gas mileage, and the Challengers looks make it the best. It's still faster than average cars you see in the road.
mike curtis people always seem to forget something called power to weight ratio doesn't matter how much power your car makes if it's heavy is not going to perform well
Just picked up a new 2010 GT a few weeks ago (got a smokin' deal)... nice to know that even though we don't have the 5.0 it is still better than the competition...and hey there is a serious aftermarket for the 4.6 3v this motor is running 9's with a stock longblock...
Crazy to think that even the old 4.6 liter could beat these three. Look at the 5.0 now and you realize how much better the Mustang has always been against these three.
"...a brake pedal so firm and responsive that we checked it for a Porsche part number." I remember that from the text! Is this guy just reading the article aloud word for word?
I love it. The smallest, much lighter car is equal to the SS in 0-80 mph which is all I really care about. The challenger/camaro have FAT dash and center consoles. The chally r/t with its 370hp up from 2008's 350, is a 4080 lb boat. Stang is 500lbs lighter. Cam is 360 lbs more. Stang gets better mpg's too. And ANYONE considering for a minute that this is new 5.0 needs to check mirror, it's not. New 420hp 5.0 does 0-60 4.4 sec,
Can some one please explain the difference to me between all the mustang options I understand the Gt and Gt500..but what is the Saleen..Cobra Jet..Rousch...427R ..Super Snake.,,King of the Road..what is the difference between all of those ??????
I own a 2010 Challenger R/T and as much as I hate to hear it the guys right. Compared to these two cars it really isn’t a game player. I truly do feel like the srt-8 is a much better comparison though. The R/T is a V8 yes but it is the smallest V8 Chrysler offered in the car. The thing is the RT is actually an awesome comparison with some of the V6 cars from the other brands due to its weight.
I have just finished driving the 2010 Camaro RT with both the V-6 and the 6.2 V-8 (both automatics). I also drove the Challenger RT with 5.7 hemi and 6-speed manual. I have also driven most versions of the Mustang with the V-6 and V-8, automatic and standard shift.
I know this is a really old video but it drives me crazy when people say "Chevy went a different route, and chose not to go retro" uh this 2010 camaro ss looks simular to my dads 1969 camaro ss... I love the appearance and I'm stuck between the challenger or the camaro right now.
@@user-hc5si5tw5p I'm from Canada, so older vehicles are normally rotten from the Salt that gets used over winter time on our roads, unfortunately the salt lasts year round a lot of the times, but yeah if it weren't for that and if I had a great paying job I would want either a Chevelle or a gto
@@Robnoxious I meant the newer gto the rebadged holden we actually get that in right hand drive in the UK as a vauxhall it's a great car about 10 thousand dollars minimum here
it doesn't matter what the hp is it's what size motor it takes to get you there and how quick it gets ya down the track...and it doesn't do it a whole lot quicker than the mustang considering it has 100 more hp. where do you get the price is lowest of the 3? a friend of mine bought an ss this past summer for 42 grand where i live....the 2010 mustangs are in the 33 grand area....fully loaded with optional 19s and glass roof it was just 37...so i'm not sure what you're talkin about there....
@TheGarrret AWD getsyou going off the line faster yes but how is it faster when its drag times are the same but there track times show that the GTR is SLOWER???
@ADD8oi 32 miles a gallon please tell me where you found that because i have read much lower epa in the 22 range also it has bad blind spots, lack of head room, hard to get in to if your over 5-9. My friend has one and he is 6ft tall nice car but its hell for him to get in and out lol
Do they have road testing on these cars for 2011? The Mustang might clean house this year...??? 305hp V6 and its lighter than the Camaro and Challenger. And gets 31mpg.
@xspettacolare There isnt a separate screen, it gives you turn by turn directions through the radio and center display. You are right there is not navigation screen but there is nav.
For 2011, the Blue Oval is introducing a new 3.7-liter V6 Mustang that should give it the firepower and refinement needed to take on Chevrolet's six-cylinder Camaro and Hyundai's upstart Genesis Coupe. But it isn't just the spanking all-aluminum powerplant and its 305 horsepower and 280 foot-pounds of torque
It sounds weird but I swear like a week ago I saw a brand new white '10 Ford Mustang on the street right outside my house. First I thought it was the 05-09 model but I noticed the rearlights was a bit different and the sound was massive when it took of. The reason its kinda weird is that it is a 2010 model which came out for sale not long ago in USA and I live in this random little town in nowhere in Norway. That doesn't make sense. The only Mustang in town before that one was a 62 cab and coupe
The gt500 is geared toward the Corvette (which the vette destroys it) and the Super Snake is not a production car. It is an aftermarket package just like hennessy or lingenfelter. So you tell me
I have a Camaro SS and neither of these cars can out perform me. The Camaro SS looks better, turns more heads and times.(In My Opinion) The only cars I can not beat our late 60's and early 70's muscle cars. My friend has a 1970 Plymouth Road Runner and with over 650 HP form a 511 HEMI, I stand humbled at and awed at this level of preformance.
thats how the mustang should have looked like in 2005, I cant even look at those models anymore, I thought ever 5 years they go under a huge change, they look like slight improvement over the 05-09 ones. I wish the 03 Mach 1 mustangs weren't in production for only a year. I love the look of those mustangs, plus unlike others... the scoop is real.
update: Yea, the comment i made was a litle old. At first, the sales were a little skewed. Now, the sells have even off 50-50 v6 to v8. yet, they don't give a percentage of that updated status. o well.
They really need to go for a independent suspension rather then a live axle no matter the price increase. this would make all of these cars much better.
its amazing to me that when GM came back with camaro and were whooping on the GTS and no body was saying nothing and now that ford had to improve there GT just to beat the SS,now every ford fan just mysteriously start commenting negative things about the SS,dont mean no harm but if something made me step my game up, than i would have nothing but good things to say about it
the most amazing thing about what Ford has done... they are the only auto manufacturer that accomplished the amount of power they have using the lowest octane level of fuel on the market. GM and Dodge are pushing for higher octane to get optimal results and power. Although i do use highest octane available in all my vehicles it is just something to think about.
@lHustonProductionsl Yeah. That's another reason why i chose the Mach 1; it had power, luxury and a fair price. Many older cars rust way too easily, but you've gotta take to heed they didn't have all the prime-and-protect we have these days for that stuff.
I have never seen an auto out of a stock GM (or any car for that matter) that has yet been tinkerd with or rebuilt or a line lock put in, beat a standard. also i really doubt they nutral droped it, becaus a stock ss does not have a line lock. Point is is both the mustang and the camaro both perform reasonably the same they cost about the same, for the same equipment relative to each company, both perform about the same both have huge aftermarket backgrounds, both do it all in very differnt ways
if the gt500 and ss camaro are not a fair race then what makes the ss and the mustang gt fair? 6.2 vs 4.6, 426hp vs 315hp, gt down 111hp?? now gt500 5.4 vs 6.2 , 540hp vs426hp,ss down 114hp. looks like a simular race to me.
On a side note, British Leyland cars had 4 wheels (except for you, Raliant Robin). Were they meant to carry people? As far as I can tell they were meant to break, because that's what they're best at.
@ericguitarlrd okay i found the GT500 you were talking about, however it ran it in a 9.97 not a 9.66 the video says 9.66 but doesnt show the board showing it ran a 9.66, you also said it was 160 mph? thats impossiable at 160 mph the quarter mile would be more around the 8's. I found the actual video of the car you thought ran it in 9.66, same car and showing board 9.97
I'm planning on getting a 2010 2SS Camaro 6-speed but someone was telling me to wait for the 2011s because his axle split on his 2010 so he sold it. He told me to check out the consumer's reports online but I didn't find any reports re: faulty axles. I'm still going after the Camaro around April next year. I have 10 grand saved up but I want to save another 5 grand.
just drove a Camaro SS today, and it is one great car. Refined, Powerful, smooth, and fast. Incredible value. Feels really solid.
I ain't picky, I like all 3 of them. All 3 of those names have been around a very long time and to me each one has it's own unique respect.
God bless the Big 3!
I'm Chevy All the way but yeap either one American muscle All the way
Then a year later here came the 5.0
LT1 is still bigger
@@pontiacGXPfan and yet, still slower
@@snowh1te208 Camaro is on a lighter platform and more hp
@@pontiacGXPfan oh really? How much did the 2011 camaro ss weigh?
@@snowh1te208 mustang gt= 3,600 lbs
camaro ss= 3,860 lbs
challenger r/t= 4,140 lbs
I would take one of each...... All are amazing retro-looking modern musclecars!👍👍
I don't really like challenger, they're heavy as fuck and get terrible gas mileage
@@cjeljefe7480 they all get about the same gas mileage, and the Challengers looks make it the best. It's still faster than average cars you see in the road.
But still a 4.6 over 100 hp down and still is only a sec slower....come on camaro
camaro is heavy as shit
+88TransAmGTA have you seen the challenger?
mike curtis people always seem to forget something called power to weight ratio doesn't matter how much power your car makes if it's heavy is not going to perform well
I’ve been saying for years. The 4.6 V8 mustangs are greatly underrated. It’s not all about numbers.
Challenger finishes in last place......over and over again
What did the Mustang and Camaro drivers do after beating the Challenger?
Turned off their Xbox's and went to bed.
Morrison Hotel RIP
But the hellcat?
Lmao now the Demon has come for your souls.
@@WalrusWinking demon is a roided out loser. It was that car vs a gt5oo and zl1 1le. Even with nearly 800 horsepower it still finished in third place
just bought a 09 mustang. Could not be more happy sounds great just enough power and my god it looks amazing
One of the nicest years of Mustang out there. Hope you're still having fun with it! :)
I still prefer the Camaro... ;-)
Yes,i buy one of 3 models in one day of my life
chevy all the way but i would take the challenger cause its sexy as hell i luv the look lil tuning and some new parts and itll be badass
i test drove all 3, i went with the challenger rt. retro looks and rider comfort second to none. has plenty of power to me..
It's funny seeing these three back then during what would've been my childhood to now when I'm 21 and each of these cars turned into beasts
Just picked up a new 2010 GT a few weeks ago (got a smokin' deal)... nice to know that even though we don't have the 5.0 it is still better than the competition...and hey there is a serious aftermarket for the 4.6 3v this motor is running 9's with a stock longblock...
Really bottom line is what you personally like. There all fast enough to get you rush on.
Crazy to think that even the old 4.6 liter could beat these three. Look at the 5.0 now and you realize how much better the Mustang has always been against these three.
The only 4.6 was still slower than the ls3 the new 5.0 dohc is faster than the camaro due to weight the dodge is just heavest but best looking.
+bigkarl24 well thats just like your opinion man
+Daniel Creaturo lol
i love how the mopar is in the back in the last clip :D
rip trans am
I hear GM is bringing back the legendary 305! I can't wait for a 5 litre showdown!
Oh well.. after all its a car supposed to get me from A to B ...
so I take the cheapest with most comfort =
Camaro SS
"...a brake pedal so firm and responsive that we checked it for a Porsche part number." I remember that from the text! Is this guy just reading the article aloud word for word?
@regularperson7 I hear you there. My Dad's first car was a sky blue '68 Fastback Mustang. I personally love the '69 COPO Camaro.
I love it. The smallest, much lighter car is equal to the SS in 0-80 mph which is all I really care about. The challenger/camaro have FAT dash and center consoles. The chally r/t with its 370hp up from 2008's 350, is a 4080 lb boat. Stang is 500lbs lighter. Cam is 360 lbs more. Stang gets better mpg's too. And ANYONE considering for a minute that this is new 5.0 needs to check mirror, it's not. New 420hp 5.0 does 0-60 4.4 sec,
wait till next year. when the mustang comes out with a new engine. :]
cant wait for the 2011 gt, new 5.0 302 with over 400 hp, really should be a great showdown between the camaro and the mustang
Camaro and Challenger are my babies.
I love all of these cars. I would love to have any of these in my driveway. But the Mustang will always have a special place in my garage.
I almost beat that mustang with my 97 dodge ram....Ill stick dodge
so what were the 1/4 miles times?
what does it mean when the car starts shaking at 80mph? is it just the tires or bearing?
best looking camaro till date
as always; the Ford Mustang is the best! Yeeeee Haaaaaa !!!
Man, they are all gorgeous. So much pride in our American muscle cars.
Can some one please explain the difference to me between all the mustang options I understand the Gt and Gt500..but what is the Saleen..Cobra Jet..Rousch...427R ..Super Snake.,,King of the Road..what is the difference between all of those ??????
go challenger
4 cyl Camry's rule!
when it comes to gas, which one should i pick, camaro 2010 or challenger 2011?
ya its awesome until it gets stuck in the snow i always go to the track and run it what do you have
@chitownavalanche Ford
Found
On
Road
Dead
so does the fully loaded honda accord and the ss whats your point?
for the skidpads is it better to have more grams or less?
What did the mustang do in the 1/4?
What will be the price of Camaro ss in Qatar
@TheJunior2541 Wasn't the Camaro and Trans AM sister cars for most of their life? Besides their body look both cars were the same?
The new challenger srt8 392 is so bad ass though.
Okay only automatic transmission each car have same hp whit standard transmicion?
I own a 2010 Challenger R/T and as much as I hate to hear it the guys right. Compared to these two cars it really isn’t a game player. I truly do feel like the srt-8 is a much better comparison though. The R/T is a V8 yes but it is the smallest V8 Chrysler offered in the car. The thing is the RT is actually an awesome comparison with some of the V6 cars from the other brands due to its weight.
how do you keep a chevy fan in suspence?
I have just finished driving the 2010 Camaro RT with both the V-6 and the 6.2 V-8 (both automatics). I also drove the Challenger RT with 5.7 hemi and 6-speed manual. I have also driven most versions of the Mustang with the V-6 and V-8, automatic and standard shift.
@HamadHHAG what kinda options did you get to make your camaro a 2 mil. car o.O
I know this is a really old video but it drives me crazy when people say "Chevy went a different route, and chose not to go retro" uh this 2010 camaro ss looks simular to my dads 1969 camaro ss... I love the appearance and I'm stuck between the challenger or the camaro right now.
No one says that... everyone says it has retro styling don't they?
@@user-hc5si5tw5p except this video, it said its the only muscle car that chose not to go retro
@@Robnoxious I wish our car selection in the UK was like u get in America, I would get a c5 vette or gto if I was u
@@user-hc5si5tw5p I'm from Canada, so older vehicles are normally rotten from the Salt that gets used over winter time on our roads, unfortunately the salt lasts year round a lot of the times, but yeah if it weren't for that and if I had a great paying job I would want either a Chevelle or a gto
@@Robnoxious I meant the newer gto the rebadged holden we actually get that in right hand drive in the UK as a vauxhall it's a great car about 10 thousand dollars minimum here
@89powerup
Buses are made to carry people around. Should they have 40 doors?
i was looking up some dyno number's on these new mustangs, and not one put out anything over 290rwhp.
the 3 legends are back
I like the old versions of this 3 legends but they look soo sweet
why didn't they test the SRT challenger instead?
it doesn't matter what the hp is it's what size motor it takes to get you there and how quick it gets ya down the track...and it doesn't do it a whole lot quicker than the mustang considering it has 100 more hp. where do you get the price is lowest of the 3? a friend of mine bought an ss this past summer for 42 grand where i live....the 2010 mustangs are in the 33 grand area....fully loaded with optional 19s and glass roof it was just 37...so i'm not sure what you're talkin about there....
@TheGarrret AWD getsyou going off the line faster yes but how is it faster when its drag times are the same but there track times show that the GTR is SLOWER???
Camaro SS is one of the best looking cars I have ever seen. And I am not a big fan of American cars.
how much is a regular mustang 2010 model?
Neil Armstrong was watching the race from the moon lol
@1964mm ok? and gm took the bail out when? i guess thats irrelevant since its almost 2011 rite?
can you take out the gauges in the car .
@JOHNNEYBOYFRESH does it run on aaa size batteries or aa ?
@ADD8oi 32 miles a gallon please tell me where you found that because i have read much lower epa in the 22 range also it has bad blind spots, lack of head room, hard to get in to if your over 5-9. My friend has one and he is 6ft tall nice car but its hell for him to get in and out lol
Do they have road testing on these cars for 2011? The Mustang might clean house this year...??? 305hp V6 and its lighter than the Camaro and Challenger. And gets 31mpg.
My pride and identity is directly proportional to the success of my favorite car manufacturer to outperform other manufacturers. I am awesome.
@xspettacolare There isnt a separate screen, it gives you turn by turn directions through the radio and center display. You are right there is not navigation screen but there is nav.
For 2011, the Blue Oval is introducing a new 3.7-liter V6 Mustang that should give it the firepower and refinement needed to take on Chevrolet's six-cylinder Camaro and Hyundai's upstart Genesis Coupe. But it isn't just the spanking all-aluminum powerplant and its 305 horsepower and 280 foot-pounds of torque
It sounds weird but I swear like a week ago I saw a brand new white '10 Ford Mustang on the street right outside my house. First I thought it was the 05-09 model but I noticed the rearlights was a bit different and the sound was massive when it took of. The reason its kinda weird is that it is a 2010 model which came out for sale not long ago in USA and I live in this random little town in nowhere in Norway. That doesn't make sense. The only Mustang in town before that one was a 62 cab and coupe
wut does the SS stand 4?
The gt500 is geared toward the Corvette (which the vette destroys it) and the Super Snake is not a production car. It is an aftermarket package just like hennessy or lingenfelter. So you tell me
ohh cool do u like the vipers
@Quatermain98526
No the 2010 stang came out in 2009 the 2011 5.0 came out in 2010, unless you live in a place where it is already 2011?
@Veyron0126 I hope so. I am a die hard Camaro and Vette fan but I love the Mustang also.
I have a Camaro SS and neither of these cars can out perform me. The Camaro SS looks better, turns more heads and times.(In My Opinion) The only cars I can not beat our late 60's and early 70's muscle cars. My friend has a 1970 Plymouth Road Runner and with over 650 HP form a 511 HEMI, I stand humbled at and awed at this level of preformance.
thats how the mustang should have looked like in 2005, I cant even look at those models anymore, I thought ever 5 years they go under a huge change, they look like slight improvement over the 05-09 ones. I wish the 03 Mach 1 mustangs weren't in production for only a year. I love the look of those mustangs, plus unlike others... the scoop is real.
update: Yea, the comment i made was a litle old. At first, the sales were a little skewed. Now, the sells have even off 50-50 v6 to v8. yet, they don't give a percentage of that updated status. o well.
@itsmarkwtf for these year models I agree. we're talking about the 4.6 mustang not the 5.0
They really need to go for a independent suspension rather then a live axle no matter the price increase. this would make all of these cars much better.
@SToANGER SOME Fords are made in Mexico. Like the Fusion, but the Mustang is made in Michigan.
Not to mention the 4.6 ford will go 350,000 miles .......life long Chevy and Pontiac guy but the Ford is simply,y the best of the 3.
...which is why I didn't say it was a pony car. I said the SMALL cars were the pony cars, Mustang and Camaro. The Chevelle was the mid-size model.
its amazing to me that when GM came back with camaro and were whooping on the GTS and no body was saying nothing and now that ford had to improve there GT just to beat the SS,now every ford fan just mysteriously start commenting negative things about the SS,dont mean no harm but if something made me step my game up, than i would have nothing but good things to say about it
@whiteyonwelfare the sticker at the ford dealer says 65% of mustang components are made in Canada... just saying
@EXiS091 it has the same amount of horsepower as the hpe1000. btw, the GT500KR is in the Z06's class as far as performance.
I think Chevy is the best looking
because, back in the 70's their were no SRT or SRT8 designations that chrysler uses today it was just RT.
Because its the classic match up. SRT8 would be put up against the Mustang GT500 and Camaro ZL1, where it also comes up short and lands in 3rd place.
the most amazing thing about what Ford has done... they are the only auto manufacturer that accomplished the amount of power they have using the lowest octane level of fuel on the market. GM and Dodge are pushing for higher octane to get optimal results and power. Although i do use highest octane available in all my vehicles it is just something to think about.
3 best friends who love competition. but still mad the R/T gives up what 2cylinders on the highway or 4?
@lHustonProductionsl Yeah. That's another reason why i chose the Mach 1; it had power, luxury and a fair price. Many older cars rust way too easily, but you've gotta take to heed they didn't have all the prime-and-protect we have these days for that stuff.
I have never seen an auto out of a stock GM (or any car for that matter) that has yet been tinkerd with or rebuilt or a line lock put in, beat a standard. also i really doubt they nutral droped it, becaus a stock ss does not have a line lock. Point is is both the mustang and the camaro both perform reasonably the same they cost about the same, for the same equipment relative to each company, both perform about the same both have huge aftermarket backgrounds, both do it all in very differnt ways
if the gt500 and ss camaro are not a fair race then what makes the ss and the mustang gt fair? 6.2 vs 4.6, 426hp vs 315hp, gt down 111hp?? now gt500 5.4 vs 6.2 , 540hp vs426hp,ss down 114hp. looks like a simular race to me.
@seanseavey I love the Camaro...it's stunning!
On a side note, British Leyland cars had 4 wheels (except for you, Raliant Robin). Were they meant to carry people? As far as I can tell they were meant to break, because that's what they're best at.
why do they compare the rt not the srt8
I personally do not like domestic cars but ford and Lincoln are the only American companies I would actually consider buying from.
@ericguitarlrd okay i found the GT500 you were talking about, however it ran it in a 9.97 not a 9.66 the video says 9.66 but doesnt show the board showing it ran a 9.66, you also said it was 160 mph? thats impossiable at 160 mph the quarter mile would be more around the 8's. I found the actual video of the car you thought ran it in 9.66, same car and showing board 9.97
I'm planning on getting a 2010 2SS Camaro 6-speed but someone was telling me to wait for the 2011s because his axle split on his 2010 so he sold it. He told me to check out the consumer's reports online but I didn't find any reports re: faulty axles. I'm still going after the Camaro around April next year. I have 10 grand saved up but I want to save another 5 grand.
Could someone tell me how to get a sweet job where i just drive new cars like this?
i got a 2007 grabber orange mustang, amazing car and the color is soo awesome
Also, you do know the camaro is outselling the mustang by 1000-2000 units a month right?