DDR5 8600 STABLE... Z790I Lightning AsRock
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 сер 2024
- Boost Your FPS!
chambertech.net
Affiliate Links:
z790I Lightning: howl.me/cmm1hf...
DDR5 8400: howl.me/cmm1hY...
DDR5 7200: amzn.to/3X3pY9W
14900K: amzn.to/4bwZH8t
Support ChamberTech Here:
/ discord
Discord:
/ discord
Socials:
TikTok: / chambertech
Twitter: / chambertech_
Instagram: / chambertech_
Yes madness! Is a legend 👍
How your tFAW is 32 when your tRRD_S is 10
tFAW = 4x tRRD_s , so either set tFAW to 40 or drop tRRD_S to 8
That is true. Should’ve been set to 48. Thanks for pointing that out
You can also set forget tFAW to 16 and but it won't perform at less than tRRD_S * 4. Haven't seen any regression doing that but yah it should generally be * 4 as you said.
You’re spot on with the A vs M die. Their qvl for XMP only goes to 8000 for A die, but it goes all the way to 8600 for M die
Have you noticed the same thing? If you have the board.
Joys of 24gbit being easier on bintels imc
Yeah do more oc videos please
Can’t get mine to post, so no debug led is a huge miss.
what software do you use to stress test your ram ??
use Karhu its like 10 bucks and you can use it up to 5 pc's
More oc content!!!
This board or the MSI MPG Z790I EDGE? Just looking for 8000mhz+ on A die sticks
Neither can do that. Buy the lightning and 2x24 sticks
@@ChamberTech in this video you said you got 8200 on A die working?
@claysmedz287 nope adie didn’t work well. Get mdie trust. It works so much better
@@ChamberTech gotcha. I know M die clocks higher because it’s easier on the memory controller. Does A die usually have tighter timings and lower latency? Or why do some people recommend that instead
Me who runs 8000 on my 7800X3D with 2000 FCLK 1:1 with UCLK in gear 2 lol, although I would go higher if AGESA didnt bork the ratios
Who still use VST!! VT3 is way better version and catch errors that VST can't
Had an OC that is stable on VST for hours but fails VT3 in 10min
Not i use VT3 and when I'm stable there I'm extra stable in VST since it's way more forgiving
yea for my 8000 on the 7800X3D (much more consistent memory controller than raptor lake) I ran over 6 hours of VT3 and a bunch of Karhu after that
its has always been better ram ocers than atx boards. itx has always had more layers and better shielding and waaaaaaaay shorter traces between the socket and dimms compared to atx even atx with two dimms. The only thing that the high end ocing atx boards can have advantage over itx is bioses for ocing. but even that is not really that exclusive for the most part(that I have seen) when it comes to certain models of boards, as the brand will often release new bioses(pretty much the same one) for many of their boards at the same time.
Not sure the stress test is valid - everyone else only getting 8200 stable
Multiple people in my discord have gotten 8400mhz
more overclocking!
Are you jufes his brother?
Great board but z790 is a dead platform.
yeah so dead mate, next platform isnt even out yet but your saying 790 is "dead". NICE BRO. What a nerd.
@@johnboy2436 I have 13700k it is like 15 to 18% slower than 14900k but it can't even max out 4090 at 1440p so I need a Very fast CPU that can max upcoming GPUs like 5090 so the z790 is a dead platform for me .
@@Decki777 well iv got a 14900ks and i can max out my 4090 in a cpu bound situations (1080p). For example high settings on MW3 in 1080p im averaging around 700FPS. In-game benchmark shows FPS for both cpu and gpu to be around the same. No bottlenecks. This is the same for other games i play.
The only reason you could even claim CPU's are not quick enough is at lower resolutions. Otherwise the load will be put more on the GPU and wouldn't matter as much which CPU you have... Unless its a CPU intensive game. Not many are...
FYI your 13700k is not close to a 14900ks. You are clearly not taking into consideration all factors here. If you look at the IMC list on OC net for the 14900ks's You will see the average IMC is over 80. I went through 6 14900k's are returned them all. The KS has good IMC's generally because the silicone is good. This is generally the case with better silicone comes better IMC. Regardless my point is. Im running 8600 cl34 stable. On a game like COD thats another 20 FPS each 200mhz step up in the in-game benchmark. Compare that to a 7600/8600 ram thats another 100FPS. The CPU is also much faster.
Thanks looking to get one of these in uk.
exactly
8600mhz stable? 😂 to start can you show us 24h kharhu test? Greetz.
Real ones know 1 hour ycruncher is harder than 24hours karhu
@@ChamberTech linpack extended is the final boss for IMC stability
@@ChamberTech No they stress different things. Karhu can find errors that wont show up in Ycruncher. I would test with both.
This is fake 🤥