Heuristics in TOK

The existence of heuristics in human thinking has some really intriguing implications, especially when you start to think about how an alien intelligence might perceive us. See, the fact that we rely so heavily on these mental shortcuts and rules of thumb to navigate the world suggests that our decision-making processes aren't always as logical and analytical as an outside observer might expect. We're not these perfectly rational, impartial beings - we're deeply influenced by our intuitions, biases, and past experiences.
And an alien intelligence that doesn't use heuristics at all might find that really, well, unsettling. I mean, imagine this alien race that approaches every problem with pure, unadulterated logic and reason - no shortcuts, no shortcuts, no messy human intuition to cloud their judgment. They might look at the way we make decisions and just scratch their heads, wondering how we ever manage to function at all.
Now, when you factor in something as sensitive and potentially dangerous as nuclear weapons, that disconnect in thinking styles could become a real issue. An alien intelligence that's used to making decisions based solely on cold, hard data might look at the way we use heuristics and see it as a glaring weakness - a flaw that makes us untrustworthy or unfit to wield such powerful technology.
They might worry that our reliance on mental shortcuts and gut instincts could lead us to make reckless, biased decisions when it comes to something as crucial as nuclear weapons. And they'd probably have a point, to be honest. I mean, how many times have we humans made questionable calls based on our preconceptions or emotions, rather than rigorous analysis?
So, I have to imagine that an alien race that doesn't use heuristics at all would be incredibly hesitant to entrust us with nuclear weapons, or any other technology that could potentially cause mass destruction. They'd probably see our heuristic-driven decision-making as a huge liability - a gaping vulnerability that makes us untrustworthy and unpredictable.
It's a fascinating thought experiment, really. It just goes to show how the way we think as humans, with all our biases and mental shortcuts, might be perceived as a fundamental flaw by an intelligence that operates on a completely different cognitive paradigm. It's a reminder that our very human-ness, for better or worse, is a key part of who we are - and it might not always be seen as an asset by those who think in drastically different ways.