"General, were you surprised… at the speed it took you to reach Stanley?" "No, I don't think I was surprised, clearly, the enemy was surprised." Bloody immortal.
While visiting Buenos Aires years ago, I met a priest who was a chaplain of the argentinian forces during the conflict. He told me ALL the british troops behaved impeccable well and were truly gentlemen.
@@copferthat Horse shit. Either a deliberate lie or a colossal degree of naiveté. Argentina has a long tradition of authoritarianism; for decades before the junta, Argentine children were taught in school that the Malvinas had been stolen and were unlawfully occupied. A supermajority of Argentinians wanted the Malvinas back, and were thrilled to see the British "defeated". "Rentamobs" in a military controlled country, lololololol
Thank you Siddik i know war is pointless over all but you must help others. Which we and commonwealth countries did some things in our past are not so good then that was another time. But then your Country went to war with us and gave many lives to save many others never forgotten
The Argentinians were 'fighting for the Islands', the British were 'fighting for the Islanders' that is why we won....My thoughts go out to the bravest British soldiers that we owe everything to...And a thought and a prayer for the brave Argentinian soldiers as well...
@@skeletorex That will only happen if the islander's want to accept you. It's been almost 200 year's. Generations ago. Get over it or understand that you must fight for the islander's, not fight for the islands, for you will be doomed to failure unless you understand that. Brute Force is not a possibility. Only with democracy can it be changed. The Islander's allegiance is to Britain not Argentina. Therefore only through politics can this be changed. We won't put up with the Islander's being invaded again. Referring to time like you did, 200 years almost and you's won't get over it.
I remember when we guarded Gen Menendez under house arrest in Port Stanley after the surrender, he requested his own armed body guards so that they could protect him from his own troops. Of course we allowed him that because you can imagine the crap that would have hit the fan if we British let his own troops see him off ! It was a bizarre situation. I can recall standing outside his house, guarding his body guards who were guarding him from his own !
I member year 1982 in the former Yugoslavia, even though Britain was on the other side of the Iron Curtain, we all supported the British in the war with Argentina. God save the Queen. Respect from Slovenia.
Thats interesting and very surprising to hear. At the time we thought all you guys hated us, so glad to hear it wasn't true. Respect to you and Slovenia 👍🏻.
@@adrianh332 Hi, we Slovenians, never hated British people. We still remember that we were ln the same side during WW II. Argentina, on the other hand, helped nazi criminals and other nazi supporters from all over the world. My grandpa was partisan during WW iII, and i still remember that he helped US snd UK pilots who bombed nazi infrasttucturr, becsuse Gerrmans would killed them, if they find them. With respect from Slovenia.
Yes the current crop of politically motivated and opiniated so called journalists wouldn't recognise real journalism like this if it slapped them in their over paid privileged faces!
My Twin brother was there during the war; being a Royal Marine Commando, I was there end of 85 with the British Army, I was pleased it was summer time!!!
Argentine soldiers were not ashamed to surrender as they knew that they were not going to me mistreated and even in defeat they would be treated with human dignity and respect.
Argentine soldiers went with love for the country and with courage. Kids who were barely 18 years old and who shouldn't have been there. The weapons were very bad and useless, they were expired. Even so they still fought and that is why we will remember them.
Argentinian soldiers at least knew being a POW wasn't a bad idea, fuck the British gave them hot food and good shelter. Argentinian soldiers were only eating cold food during the war
@@carinajauregui9383 it's obvious the island is either British, French or Spanish. Never Argentinian though. Hell the prior three had all claimed them before Argentina existed as we know it. Then the British held it since. The people there are as British as Wales.
@@carinajauregui9383 So glad to read your heartfelt apology for your invasion of our territory, and your recognition that the Falklands are forever British territory.
The English patriotism is very uplifting which is very sensible also in these pictures. It was Great victory a Great liberation! There are two nations, people’s who can be characterized as: who cannot be subjugated! The Soviet (which includes the Russian people) and the English people. The fact that Napoleon, Hitler etc. was unable to oppress them is not exponible only with the fact that it’s very hard to cross the channel and Russia/Soviet Union is very „big” - in my opinion -. The English and Soviet inc. Russian people has something like harder will then diamond, if the Motherland is in danger, in that situation they put everything aside and go on together for the common sacred purpose. Glory to the liberators of the Falkland Islands! Mr. Steve Johnson, Thank you for uploading these videos! Greetings’ from Hungary!
The Scots Guards fought their best, the 5th Marine infantry battalion on the capture of Mt Tumbledown. They never received the recognition they deserved & are forgotten or worse, not acknowledged by too many. The 5th MBI practiced night fighting for a month prior to the British landings, they were tough determined soldiers & it took nearly 12 hours for the Guards to break them down. The Scots Guards lost 8 men, the Argentinians 30+
@MichaelKingsfordGray regardless if you believe in God, the speech was bloody brilliant. How can it be wrong to say that "remember what was dearest to you when your life could've ended"
+MacEachainn Just like the British Government were the good guys in getting rid of Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein in Libya, Syria and Iraq, starting bloody civil wars in the name of Freedom (all really in the name of petrol), in which hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children have been killed at the hands of the US-British New World Order.
Pablo Nero what are you talking about? Getting rid of Gaddafi and Saddam didn't start the civil wars, the UK didn't even get rid of Gaddaffi that was the people rising up. As for Iraq the civil war only started in 2014 after the UK and US had left and handed over to the Iraq army but yeah it was our fault.
+MacEachainn You must be a young school age kid. Watch "The Iraq War From The Frontline" on youtube and then come back and tell me the British aren't part of the New Evil Empire in the form of the New World Order and didn't start the civil war in Iraq beween Shiites and Sunnis by removing Saddam Hussein who had kept a tight lid on the situation just like Gaddafi in Libya and Assad in Syria. Face it, the current bloodbath in the Middle East is because of petrol and the US-British intervention.
to attack a prepared position one must expect 4 losses for 1 defender but somehow they lost 1 attacker for twice the wankers (not their fault, they were kids), poor guys who fixed bayonets and went mental and won! utter heroes x
+spitroastfor8 Yes but the Brits did not have the courage to assault the Argie positions without first flattening them with 50,000 field & naval artillery & mortar rounds (like the 2,000 mortar shells that saturated Darwin Ridge & the 6,000 field artillery shells needed to take Wireless Ridge).
There wasn't much artillery fire on Goose Green, and the British infantry went through the Argentine defensive positions like knife through butter. There is no excuse, there can be only one conclusion and that is that the British troops were superior.
Las tropas de infantería británica eran mejores, pero siempre atacaron con superioridad numérica local en todos los casos. No se dejen guiar por números totales, sino por los específicos de ataque a cada posición argentina.
@@carlosvalbertovelazquez5500 who the fuck cares anymore? The islanders want to stay under British rule. I know your gonna say BuT tHeY aReN't ThE nAtIvEs bullshit but the US consists of non natives yet they have full control of themselves.
@@theoddster830 ISLANDERS NOT HAS ANY RIGHT TO CHOOSE BECAUSE ORIGINARY RESIDENT PEOPLE WITH ARGENTINE GOVERNOR WAS THROWN OF THE ISLAND IN 1833, DURING THE 4th.BRITISH INVASION AT ARGENTINE TERRITORY.
I think it is a great shame that a dictatorship took Argentina to war and that we were compelled to fight and defeat them in order to restore democracy. I think it was absolutely the right thing to do, but so entirely needless in the first place. That’s why I feel great sorrow at the loss of life on both sides. And just for your information, I am an officer in the Royal Navy and I have been to the Falkland Islands on patrol in 2005. I’ve seen the battlefields and been up tumbledown. It’s a sobering experience and all the blustering armchair generals here need to grow up a little and discover some humanity inside themselves about what was an exceptionally sad affair, when all is said and done.
Thank you for what you did and really, thank you for such an enlightened and true comment. This war was totally unnecessary but caused by the junta. Sad that some idiot in a capital caused a war.
Literally everything we have today, our very nations, freedoms, even language depended on a war, at some stage. Whining and complaining about the waste, the horror of war really is a moot point because all you enjoy today, your very existence, the way of life, culture, civilization depended on frankly a war, at some stage. For example, had the Battle of Vienna been lost, or the Battle of Tours, Europe would be Islamic today. To me, those were great victories and wars well worth the fight and price. I am proud of my European ancestors for what they did to save Europe from an Islamic hell. I am not pro-war, but understand reality and sometimes one has no option but to fight or die.
Geralt of Rivia Of course you don’t have the option sometimes between fighting or dying or even fighting AND dying as it happens, but I don’t see things such as civilisation as being dependent on or created by war, rather that they are influenced and shaped by wars. Civilisations aren’t created from wars, because wars don’t create anything in and of themselves; it’s an illogical thing to expect war to produce. It can only eliminate or rule out certain things or directions of travel. It can’t create. Take for example the outcome of this war. Democracy was restored, but the sum total was a loss of life. The essential payment was a loss and the net result was restoration of a pre existing situation. The alternative would have been another loss, the subjugation and eradication of the islanders and the settlement there. So the war stood to produce two outcomes one way or another, but both were losses in the final reckoning. Like surgery that removes living tissue to save the life of the body that it’s connected to, war can’t put anything living back in place of what it removes; it can only stop the rot or spread of disease by cutting out the illness or stitching the wound.
The British claim that Argies planted field guns among the civilian houses during the fighting is all BS. Study the military maps and you''ll see that the 3rd Artillery Group was placed in and around Moody Brook Valley while the 4th Airborne Artillery Group was placed in and around Stanley Racecourse. The 155mm guns were positioned on the slopes of Sapper Hill.
Not true. The only three civillians dead at war were victims of british fire. And there were not argies around. Argentine soldiers threated the local population with deep respect. Argentine marines had orders of no Killing soldiers or civillians when they attacked the Falklands un 1982. And so they did. Not a single murder nor rape. Remember what the occupation forces in Irak or Afghanistan do to local population in many cases. Excuse me for My Bad English. Respect and regards from Argentina. Had family members in the war.
Profoundly Deaf they did, they had Anti-air guns stationed around civilian houses and they painted buildings that housed troops and Ammo with red crosses, so they wouldn’t be targeted
i served 14 yrs in the UNITED STATES Marine Corps, and am very glad the Brits , esp Royal Marines, are now are allies , cause they are the last fighting force i would want to face. i grew up as an american child watching this war on tv and found the warfighting extremely interesting and very important world history.
The words spoken by Padre Cooper are nothing short of magnificent. I would have loved to have him as my Chaplain in Iraq. Our guy wasn’t bad but he lacked the beautiful charm and eloquence of this gentleman.
Ours was Frank Collins who was on the Iranian embassy job as a 21 year old, the youngest regiment man on the job. Sadly he gassed himself in his car a while back after he'd been removed from us for writing his book. A great man and not your atypical man of the cloth. I found they were 2 types, the ram it down your throat type or the ones who don't force it but do a brilliant job for morale. Not many atheists in a fighting position
Yup, imperialism is unacceptable. I presume, therefore, that the Argentines will drop their imperialistic claim to the Falkland Islands and then evacuate Argentina itself for their ancestral homelands in Spain, Italy and elsewhere in Europe leaving the Pampas to their original inhabitants..
+Julie & Mark A. I agree as long as your miliitary allies in the form of Canada, the US, Australia, New Zealand and Chile do the same thing and we turn back the clock and leave Britain alone to fight the Second World War and the Falkands.
Kimberly Williams So many falsehoods in your diatribe. I will restrict myself to correcting you on two. Firstly the Royal Household takes money from no pockets. No taxes are used to cover its expenses. The Household is funded by 15% of the income of the Duchy of Lancaster. Secondly, the Falklands were British long before Argentina was established by Spanish and Italian settlers who pushed the natives off their land. If you are suggesting that the map of the world should revert to the way it looked in 1690, well I would like to warn you that quite a few people might be upset at the prospect.
En realidad Las Malvinas siempre estuvieron bajo la soberanía española, y luego argentina. Los británicos se establecieron en unos pocos años en la isla que ellos llaman Pebble (creo), pero luego fueron expulsados por los españoles en 1770. Y luego se fueron en 1774. La Argentina es sucesora legal de España, bajo varios nombres, Provincias Unidas, Confederación Argentina y República Argentina. Es lo mismo que ocurre con el Reino Unido, cuando ocupa las Malvinas creo que no figuraba Irlanda en el título del país, pero todos sabemos quienes son.
My hat's off to 3 Bde. I went down with 5 Bde, as a 'Loggy'. I was cold and wet too, but wasn't expected to 'engage the enemy'. The lads that liberated the Islands deserve massive respect. Well done chaps. And I want to that the Padre for his words.
What is most depressing is the Anglo-Argentine relationship, today - thirty six years later. Contrast it with the Anglo-German relationship: within a decade of WW2, we were NATO allies, educational, cultural and trading partners, sporting rivals that were building a constructive future. We read here, all the "What ifs" in the conflict - What if these 2 democracies had reconciled themselves in the intervening years? The answer must surely have been peace and prosperity; this dysfunctional relationship (except the sport of Polo and the odd bottle of Malbec) is depressing!
I put to you, the relationship between Germany and the UK, after WW1. Considerably colder than after WW2. Losing a war does that. It breeds terrible resentment. It happens when the people of a defeated nation still consider that victory would have been justified. Father to sons, teacher to students. But with each new generation this is slowly going away. Argentina is a country of moral infants. Slowly growing up. This is undeniable. The terror attack against the jews in Argentina and their appauling response... Brazil however, most people never supported Argentinian ambition. It's the country where all the nazis went to hide... It's one sick puppy. Terrible place...
@@lucascampos5498 La mayor comunidad de judíos en Latinoamérica, la mayor comunidad de británicos en Latinoamérica. Hospitales y educación pública utilizada por todos los países limítrofes. Alimentamos a Europa durante la WW2. Sin nosotros España, Francia, El reino unido se hubiesen muerto de hambre. Le dimos al mundo la lapicera, el by pass coronario, el diseño moderno del helicóptero, el mejor corredor de Fórmula Uno de la historia y los dos mejores jugadores de fútbol de la historia. Un país corrupto y decadente con grandes problemas internos, eso es innegable No puedo permitir que llames a la Argentina un "lugar terrible" cuando no lo es y mucho menos para los extranjeros.
way back in 1992 I was at a reception here in Stanley, where Maggie and General Moore both gave a speech. What will always stay with me was a mini bollocking from Maggie at 3 of us in the crowd, as she passed us she stumbled on a beer bottle or something...she told us to 'clear this mess up!' ...absolutely priceless!
As an Argentine myself I would like to say some things. 1. War was a mistake, most stupid mistake that Argentina ever made in terms of intrernational politics. (And we have done really stupid mistakes in this country, so that is a deep low) 2. The falklands/malvinas islanders already made it clear that they prefer being ruled by british. And yes, we can argue about who owned the land 150 years ago, but honestly makes no sense at this point. And even if some believe Argentina deserves to rule the islands right now, aside from what locals want, war was stupid, Argentinian goverment should realized that trying to war against a experienced country like British with such old weapons, bad training for ground forces and everything against the odds was stupid as minimum. Let's be realistic, aside from who owned the islands 150 years ago, the islanders obviously feel more friendly to british, and the stupid war only increased that feeling for sure (basically we fucked it up even more) 3. As Argentine myself, I am patriotic about my country a bit. But don't make the mistake of thinking that goverment is the same thing as the country and its people for me. I dislike all argentine goverments since soooo long. And I do respect anyone who was in the battlefield, british soldiers were fighting for what the believed it was correct, and some young near teen argentinians did too, even if they were brainwashed by the goverment, you must understand that they were between eighteen to twenty years old sometimes, naive and really young. Even if you hate Argentinian goverment for what they did, at least respect the soldiers... as some veterans do by themselves eachother: both, british people and argentinian people, should learn about the veterans instead of hating people who we don't even know. If some of them were able to forgive their enemy and respect eachother, we should try to. Respect from Argentina to anyone reading this.
In 1982 just before the Falklands conflict loomed, I left the merchant navy. A month later my ship, a RO RO was requisitioned by the British Government and joined the task force, with my relief onboard. Thankfully, though being under attack, both ship and my friend survived and returned home safely. In 1992, I rejoined the merchant navy as a radio officer - my first ship was the Norland. It came as a surprise when on board to learn of its sterling service in the Falklands war. I have great respect for all those who shipped south, not knowing if they would come back. As for myself, I considered myself extremely lucky, lucky that my leave was due and did not find myself caught up in such a bitter conflict.
britain was supported by gurkhas in falkland war..GURKHAS are the bravest of the brave..soilders from ta hilla and mountains of nepal with khukuri in their hands .. JAY MAHAKALI AAYO GORKHALI JAY GORAKHNATH
After more than 42 years, finally I get to see Brigadier General Moore in person albeit thru an also 42 year old documentary. He was responsible in liberating our town of Limbang in British colony of Sarawak during November or December of 1962. Thank you General Sir for liberating Limbang AND the Falklands 20 years later.
Although it hurts, I am very grateful that Argentina is surrendered, I would not have liked that Buenos Aires ends as Hiroshima, I am very sorry for the loss of both sides
What he says at 4:05 sums up why Britain rarely loses wars while always maintaining an image of being weak and unprepared. They throw together whatever they can find in the garden shed to keep the enemy at bay, make deals and alliances with the right people and quietly but effectively undermine their enemies while waiting for their arrogance to get the better of them. They understand the pitfalls of this arrogance from firsthand experience - when they were at the height of their power they used to suffer embarrassing defeats as well.
LONDON (AP) _ Britain would not have recaptured the Falkland Islands from Argentina in 1982 without U.S. military assistance, former U.S. Navy Secretary John Lehman was quoted Sunday as saying. In a British Broadcasting Corp. television interview to be broadcast Wednesday night, Lehman also says U.S. involvement in the Falklands war led indirectly to the Irangate scandal, the Observer newspaper reported. The weekly said Lehman’s interview will be included in the latest episode of ″An Ocean Apart,″ a BBC documentary series on British-American relations. ″Britain would have had to have withdraw from the Falklands″ if the Reagan administration withheld support, it quoted Lehman as saying. U.S. military aid in the 74-day war, in which Britain recaptured the South Atlantic archipelago from invading Argentine forces, has been a closely guarded secret, the Observer said. ″Lehman is the first senior U.S. official to claim that the Pentagon’s supplies of intelligence and material were so great as to have been decisive,″ it said.
pickneydem yes friend , they should , just to clean the earth of some scambags trying to do something stupid, like throwing themselves against mortal machine gun fire
Local fireman Lewis Clifton describes how the sanitation system of Port Stanley broke under the strain of accommodating & processing 1000s of British soldiers & Argie POWs suffering from diarrhea: "The place just couldn't take it. There was only sporadic electricity and water and the sanitation system collapsed. The streets were ankle-deep in human waste. The stench was awful, really awful, and we were all suffering from what we called Galtieri's revenge. He lost the war but left us ill." (Occupation of the Falkland Islands, WIKIPEDIA)
What didn't that horrible fascist government do? They couldn't even be good at war talk about a fail fascism xD. Thanks to Britain for defeating these scum and yet always behaving with such excellent gallantry and discipline. There are lots of groups of armed men out there, there are very few "armies". UK army is always respected. -from Canada.
I remember this all unfolding while at secondary school, our history teacher let us watch the news and read the papers in class. It was surreal, Britain at war in my lifetime...very strange. Of course we have other conflicts since but, to be so young and the only other wars/conflicts were told by grandparents , uncles etc. Later in life I read and watched about the Falklands again and was shocked really at how the Argentinian troops looked after surrendering. They didn't want to be there, just conscripted lads with basic training and a officer corps that was, in some places, rotten in how it treated the them. The Junta gambled and failed in that the UK would do nothing...professional soldiers through and through. I have spoken to many US soldiers who served with UK forces and all have said they would work with and fight with British soldiers any time and knew they could depend on them in a firefight also they had a very high respect for UK officers. As has been stated, many Argentinian people are/were good and were treated with fear under terrible governments for many years...the Falklands was one too many. Although the democratic governments in power still rattle their sabres over the Falkland islands at times, I think a lesson has been learned...leave alone.
To be fair to the Argie officers & NCOs, Lieutenant Chris Caroe from X-Ray Coy 45 Commando spoke highly of them when he explained that although the defenders his platoon encountered on Southern Two Sisters were mainly conscripts “they were a force to be reckoned with because they were led by skilled regulars.” www.cheshire-live.co.uk/news/chester-cheshire-news/ex-marine-chris-caroe-chester-recalls-5179719 Lieutenant Clive Dytor whose platoon took part in the fighting for the Northern Two Sisters confirms this view when he mistook the ordinary conscripts and NCOs for hardened enemy marines, “The Argentine marines all fought to the end and were killed with bullets and bayonets. We had to fight through lots of positions, clearing the enemy." web.archive.org/web/20120427180020/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/falklandislands/9164691/Falklands-War-hero-explains-why-he-entered-the-church-after-being-awarded-the-Military-Cross.html
@@vivaseineldin I do agree, many were very good soldiers led by well trained regulars and NCO's and officers. However, I do think that many Argentine soldiers felt bewildered and unsure of what to do. You look at the faces of the surrendering UK troops at Government house, disappointment, humiliation yet a steely look in their eyes that this wasn't over. The same look in the eyes of the Argentine troops and officers does not show the same-they look defeated. I have read that, the same as you that many UK soldiers, pilots, officers, naval personnel all said that they admired the resistance that was given and the bravery shown.
@@eddiesolo1971 The great problem of the war is that Argentina only planned the recapture of the islands, and a hypothetical subsequent negotiation. It was never thought of going to war against the United Kingdom. That is why the total improvisation of the defense, and the fact of sending troops from a subtropical zone to a place with a sub-Antarctic climate. The troops in principle were "symbolic" and were not intended to fight. Even the III Infantry Brigade crossed to the islands without their heavy equipment.
The people, not their barbaric empire. They executed some wounded soldiers, killed 3 islanders and destroyed the Bolivian economy because they helped Argentina
@scaraboo3624 No proof of any executions, and the friendly fire was accidental. Argentina on the other hand forcibly displaced islanders from their homes, threatened them, and trapped bombs to toys.
I think it was criminal of the Argentine leadership to send those young conscripts in there like that. Surely their intelligence services must have had some clue of what the professional British forces were going to do when they landed in the Falklands. Those conscripts never stood a chance. But one thing is for sure... credit where credit is due...the Argentine naval and air force pilots showed their metal. I've read that as far as they were concerned, their mission was to save their comrades on the ground and they sure fought hard. Hats off.
Argie conscripts forced two Para companies to retreat in the morning fighting at Goose Green. Argie conscripts also forced 3 PARA to retreat halfway through the Battle of Mount Longdon.
The Junta didn't really expect Britain to fight at all. They thought the invasion would force some kind of negotiated settlement that would eventually give them sovereignty of the Islands. By the time they realised their mistake it was too late to withdraw their troops, Argentine public opinion made that politically impossible. So they found themselves fighting a war that they just weren't mentally prepared for and couldn't cope with.
An argie general wrote a letter of thanks for bringing down the brutal junta, who to tortured and dropped into the ocean 1000 plus people in Argentina.
@EddieExile but the "tiny" carriers hold two complete squadrons of Harriers less than 100 miles from the islands, moving to a different location at the end of each day, thus making then untracebale, whilst the argentinian bases where fixed airstrips at triple the distance always having the same attack pattern and only permitting 10 minutes of operational flight over the island for their combat jets.
Galtieri: - Estoy lidiando con una pesadilla económica y un creciente malestar civil No se preocupen chicos, voy a arreglar esto Lo sé, comenzaré una guerra y seré popular durante dos meses.
@Eddieposted - But I think Armi means that the surrender involved only the forces in the Falklands. It did not involve giving up the claims. I remember that there was some time of uneasiness after surrender. That was the reason why 600 Ar. POWs were sent home only after a month.
Back in the day when it was just a fight, could they imagine the shit we had today, my service was simply walking around Pristina, which to be honest was more enjoyable than being at home, I really wouldn't fancy doing what our lads do today.
Major Guillermo Berazay. "I often spoke with a lady who's house we used. When the shelling started, she said she would not be talking to me again but she wanted to say this. Geographically this may be considered part of Argentina, but this small boy is the fifth generation born here. We feel that the country belongs to us, not England, not Argentina, because we were born here, we live here and as you can see I am 40 years old but look 60, life here is hard but nobody has ever cared for us."
Me párese que te equivocas..no te acordás cuando los sacaron cagando del continente con aceite caliente..UD si no fuera x los aliados perdían todas las guerras..y fíjate en Malvinas..con aviones viejos..y grandes pilotos le infierno media flota..y se querían rendir..con barcos modernos..me párese si pones en la balanza las pérdidas no se quién perdió...las Malvinas se encuentran en la plataforma continental Argentina x lo tanto es Argentina x derecho..y UD la usurparon..infórmate más..y mira los videos ingleses
It was a disgraceful headline. The sinking of the Belgrano may have been necessary, and it was certainly legitimate, the Belgrano was an enemy warship on an aggressive war cruise, but that kind of crowing over the deaths of more than 300 young men is both shameful and sickening. That headline must have been written by a civilian because no sailor would ever have written something so crass.
@Justin Time Yes, I'm aware of that. The two destroyer escorts (ironically British built) sailed away immediately for fear they would be torpedoed too. Unfortunately many of those who had survived the sinking of the Belgrano had died of exposure before they returned. The Argentine Navy didn't exactly cover itself in glory during that war!
In the early 2000's I traveled briefly through Argentina, loved it, very friendly people, and wish them no ill will. However, in 1982, they didn't know who they were fucking with. Tip of the hat to all the lads who gave their lives or were maimed in a just cause.
Argentines generally like the British. We have no personal problem with them. There is a part of the Argentine territory usurped by the United Kingdom since 1833. That is a serious political problem.
@@carinajauregui9383 Surely Argentina only came into being as a nation in 1861 after period of war. How can it yours if you didn't exist when Britain came to the islands. just because you're close to place does not make yours.
@@alanjjeff It's a misunderstanding. Argentina had its first government of its own from May 25, 1810, and declared its independence (a formality) on July 9, 1816. You confuse the existence of Argentina with the consolidation of a National State (in case you are interested , that was achieved only in 1880) For what interests us, Argentina existed at the time the British usurped the Malvinas on January 3, 1833, and the Argentine flag was lowered, not another.
@@carinajauregui9383 But that 1810 declaration was not for the Argentina but open the fight for the creation of Argentina. Its formal creation was not internationally accepted until 1861 when the country became a federation along the borders recognised today. This did not exercise a claim for the Falkland islands/ las Malvinas. The British claim to sovereignty dates from 1690, when they made the first recorded landing on the islands. Spain did make claims that the Falkland Islands were to held under provisions in the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht which settled the limits of the Spanish Empire in the Americas. However, the treaty only promised to restore the territories in the Americas held prior to the War of the Spanish Succession. The Falkland Islands was not held by Spain at the time and were not mentioned in the treaty. This treaty would be the sole claim by Spain and its successors that could be considered. But as the island were already claimed by Britain this 1713 Spanish claim failed. You may feel that Viceroyalty of the River Plate claimed the Falklands in 1811 but whilst this covered part of Argentina it was not a pre-argentine government and its claim was based on the previous Spanish Claim.
@@alanjjeff Hello Alan. Some corrections: Argentina was recognized by the United Kingdom in 1825 (by the way, your country did not make any reservations about the Malvinas where Argentina already exercised sovereignty) Argentina took formal possession of the islands on November 6, 1820 without any formal complaint from the United Kingdom (which, as I told you, 5 years later recognized Argentine independence) The British claim to FULL sovereignty over the islands dates back to 1829. Until that time the British only claimed Pebble and Saunders Islands. In 1690 James Strong landed on the islands, BUT DID NOT CLAIM SOVEREIGNTY (that is a recent invention of British propagandists) Spain has always exercised control of its possessions, including the Austral Sea (South Atlantic). Utrecht only recognized the Spanish sphere of influence (supported by the British who did not want the French to interfere in the Spanish Empire now that the same royal family ruled in both countries) The United Kingdom did not claim the islands, but settled in Port Egmont in 1765, but the French were already in Port Luis (1764), and recognized Spanish sovereignty in 1766. In short, the British were late to claim possession, and late to claim sovereign rights. Greetings
10:45 The Argentine's cause was not helped by them deliberately placing guns and missiles between civilian houses, knowing how loath the British would be to fire back at them. They placed their Anti-Aircraft guns in the school playground. They used schools as weapons dumps and painted buildings housing military, as hospitals. They knew of course that the red cross is the international symbol of immunity. "There must be something in the Geneva convention or some such code of war, that forbids it!" And yet the British media completely ignore when Hamas do all of the above and much worse in Gaza to civilians. How they fire indiscriminately at Israeli civilians and place their missile launchers between apartment buildings, using their own people as human shields to protect these terrorists. How they use hospitals as weapons dumps and buildings housing the press as military headquarters. Somehow, in the eyes of the BBC, Sky, ITV, Channel 4 and the online media, it is one rule for Argentina and another for Hamas.
Hence I no longer pay for a BBC TV license and refuse to watch their output. The corporation is run by Corbyn loving anti-semites. The only news article from the region recently was about a Gaza farmer finding an ancient statue and a Russion talking bollocks about Hitler being Jewish. Nothing about indiscriminate terrorist attacks on Israelis. And no, I am neither Israeli or Jewish, just a chap that believes a news organisation funded by the British people should be impartial in every way.
@@xaviervalenziano7872 if you believe that the you are as deluded as the murderous argentine junta of 1980s, the war was won the day the mighty Belgrano met its fate at the hands of one British submarine, Harriers sealed the juntas fate. remember the same argentine junta that stole children from distraught parents who dared to speak out and threw innocent argentine people from helicopters into the perishing sea, the same sea where the fleeing cowardous argentine navy left all them brave sailors of the Belgrano to die in the cold sea, however good prevailed over the evil occupying argentine forces were soundly beaten on their own doorstep in a fight Argentina started, and now peace ensues yet again over the Glorious Falkland Islands....GOD SAVE THE QUEEN.....SALUTE THE CONQUERER....HAIL TO THE HARRIER
@@ashyk72 están peleando por un territorio que esta a más de 13mil km !! Como van a pelear por una tierra que no es de uds manada de piratas!! No te das cuenta que uds precisaron ayuda de Estados Unidos y Chile para vencer a un país de tercer mundo?
@@ashyk72 en todo caso habla que uds empezaron el conflicto hundiendo al general Belgrano fuera de la zona de exclusión uds empezaron esa guerra!! Anda que yo te saqué de tu casa a trompadas!! Y usé tu heladera no seas imbécil desde 1833 que uds ocupan esas islas!! Lee sobre las invasiones inglesas la primera y la segunda!! Los sacamos cagando
No jugamos sucio no fuimos a 15000 km de nuestra tierra a sacarle la isla a otro pais x herencia española son argentinas a 500 km de nuestro territorio
Democracy, (of a sort) returned to Argentina courtesy of the British forces. They didnt just liberate the islands they gave the Argentinian people their country back...
Nice from the padre, read the book from Mike Curtis 'onder vuur' in dutch, it was exactly what he has written, full church and he lost his mate steve. Sad..
I served alongside the Canadians in Bosnia - as a Military Policeman. Top blokes and they really wack up an awesome breakfast! God bless the Canadians :)))
Man for man the British produce THE best, most effective and bravest soldiers .Thats how we took over 1/3 of the world with a country the size of New York. But hand to hand combat is in the past and makes us as about effective as Sweden now. But id just love no war again and full bellies for all.
In 1953 I was serving in the flagship of the American and West Indies squadron. a light cruiser. An Argentine frigate was reported as sniffing around the Falklands so we had to go down there to chase them away. They wisely legged it pretty quickly after it was made known that we were on our way and we sat in the harbour at Port Stanley for a couple of weeks just in case they came back.
Some of the crew of HMS HECLA with the casualties they were repatriating via Montevideo. Silver sulfadiazine dressing bags for hand burns are visible. Army casualties have been issued temporary clothing to replace their burnt uniforms. (Crown Copyright) * Video: ua-cam.com/video/EChlMvuJqDA/v-deo.html
lum otaku It is a problem with every Army in the fired, they don't have portie potties. A sewage system designed for 3 or 4 thousand folks can't handle 12 thousand folks. So Armies resort to ground latrines. However, pissing on the post office floor isn't nice or healthy.
argentain soldiers were actually 18 y/o boys who were forced to fight because we were on a dictatorship, if you didn't want to fight they will kill you and your family. These "freaking disgusting" argentain soldiers never used a weapon before, because they weren't trained to fight.
"General, were you surprised… at the speed it took you to reach Stanley?"
"No, I don't think I was surprised, clearly, the enemy was surprised."
Bloody immortal.
Classic British understatement.
@@douglasarthur2673 Yeah, almost like running away from Hitler and giving away foreign coutnries...
xxxXXXCH04XXXxxx Are you from Argentina?
@@likeitout Hell nah!
xxxXXXCH04XXXxxx Where are you from?
While visiting Buenos Aires years ago, I met a priest who was a chaplain of the argentinian forces during the conflict.
He told me ALL the british troops behaved impeccable well and were truly gentlemen.
Are the chaplain told story the Brits troops behaved when they sold narcotics forcefully to another country?
The ordinary Argentines are good people, who have a history of bad governments.
No doubt. Governments start wars, people don't.
And others go die for them.
Why were they cheering in the streets the day of the invasion then?
@@gastonbell108 Rentamobs
@@copferthat Horse shit. Either a deliberate lie or a colossal degree of naiveté. Argentina has a long tradition of authoritarianism; for decades before the junta, Argentine children were taught in school that the Malvinas had been stolen and were unlawfully occupied. A supermajority of Argentinians wanted the Malvinas back, and were thrilled to see the British "defeated".
"Rentamobs" in a military controlled country, lololololol
At 5:40, was the classic comment. The Argies were fighting for the islands. The Brits were fighting for the islanders.
Arctic Grayling that’s a powerful statement
Eso se debe a que los isleños son británicos y las islas son argentinas. Si los isleños desean habitar el Reino Unido me parece muy bien.
rodrigo rodrigo can you speak in the official language of the Falkland islands please
@@qv8281 we are not in the Falklands right now.
at least not me.
@@rodrigorodrigo1055 las islas son de quienes viven ahí, y ellos no quieren vivir en el RU, ellos quieren vivir en sus islas
The sun never sets in the British Empire... Love frome Bangladesh.... Ancient british India
fcuk the Empire, but protect the Falkland Islanders. They are the ones confronting imperialism.
Thank you Siddik i know war is pointless over all but you must help others. Which we and commonwealth countries did some things in our past are not so good then that was another time. But then your Country went to war with us and gave many lives to save many others never forgotten
Corona virus is the great problem by U K. Today. I from Argentine
Very decent of you, mate.
@@DiegoPerez-zv5wb Does Wuhan sound very British?
The Argentinians were 'fighting for the Islands', the British were 'fighting for the Islanders' that is why we won....My thoughts go out to the bravest British soldiers that we owe everything to...And a thought and a prayer for the brave Argentinian soldiers as well...
The islanders are British. Ther were planted there after 1833. The Malvinas are and always Will be Argentinas.
@Johnny Golightly for now. The islands Someday Will return where the Belong Beyond doubt
@@skeletorex That will only happen if the islander's want to accept you. It's been almost 200 year's. Generations ago. Get over it or understand that you must fight for the islander's, not fight for the islands, for you will be doomed to failure unless you understand that. Brute Force is not a possibility. Only with democracy can it be changed. The Islander's allegiance is to Britain not Argentina. Therefore only through politics can this be changed. We won't put up with the Islander's being invaded again. Referring to time like you did, 200 years almost and you's won't get over it.
@@clairemcfadyen1036 the islanders have no rights. They are implanted, so they have no voice Nor rights over the lands.
@@skeletorex The Islander's have been there for almost 200 year's. The islands belong to them.
I like Padre Cooper's sermon..Well said Padre!!
I remember when we guarded Gen Menendez under house arrest in Port Stanley after the surrender, he requested his own armed body guards so that they could protect him from his own troops. Of course we allowed him that because you can imagine the crap that would have hit the fan if we British let his own troops see him off ! It was a bizarre situation. I can recall standing outside his house, guarding his body guards who were guarding him from his own !
Sums up the whole disastrous mess of the Argentine forces. Thank you for your service Sir.
We beat the Argy Bargies well!🙂😼
@@padijeff5675 WE ? DO YOU FIGHT IN MALVUNAS ?
Carlos vAlberto Velazquez no but my cousin is a 3* officer though!🙂
@@padijeff5675 did you fight ??? it seems like it hahahha !!!! Coward
I member year 1982 in the former Yugoslavia, even though Britain was on the other side of the Iron Curtain, we all supported the British in the war with Argentina. God save the Queen. Respect from Slovenia.
Thank you Slovenia 👍
Thats interesting and very surprising to hear. At the time we thought all you guys hated us, so glad to hear it wasn't true. Respect to you and Slovenia 👍🏻.
@@adrianh332 Hi, we Slovenians, never hated British people. We still remember that we were ln the same side during WW II. Argentina, on the other hand, helped nazi criminals and other nazi supporters from all over the world. My grandpa was partisan during WW iII, and i still remember that he helped US snd UK pilots who bombed nazi infrasttucturr, becsuse Gerrmans would killed them, if they find them. With respect from Slovenia.
Lol, why support a side which has clearly occupied a land which does not belong to them?
I am a Falklands veteran. Thank you.
The level of journalism compared to now
Yes the current crop of politically motivated and opiniated so called journalists wouldn't recognise real journalism like this if it slapped them in their over paid privileged faces!
@@paulcolville5972 Couldnt have said it better.
My dad was a marine who yomped across the island! Proud! 🇬🇧🇬🇧
My Twin brother was there during the war; being a Royal Marine Commando, I was there end of 85 with the British Army, I was pleased it was summer time!!!
@Gareth Cooke He started with 45 Commando in Arbroath then I think 42 or something, not sure about that? But definitely 45....
The Padre’s speech about what is impossible was spot on.
Argentine soldiers were not ashamed to surrender as they knew that they were not going to me mistreated and even in defeat they would be treated with human dignity and respect.
And they were.
Argentine soldiers went with love for the country and with courage. Kids who were barely 18 years old and who shouldn't have been there. The weapons were very bad and useless, they were expired. Even so they still fought and that is why we will remember them.
@Robert Bonvallet By whom ?
Argentinian soldiers at least knew being a POW wasn't a bad idea, fuck the British gave them hot food and good shelter. Argentinian soldiers were only eating cold food during the war
Not many countries can say fuck the British and get away with it..tiny island with the biggest balls 😀
My god, that Padres speech was something.
Typical old school C of E.
‘The Argentines were fighting for the islands, the British were fighting for the islanders’
Es obvio, los isleños son británicos, las islas son argentinas.
@@carinajauregui9383 it's obvious the island is either British, French or Spanish. Never Argentinian though. Hell the prior three had all claimed them before Argentina existed as we know it. Then the British held it since. The people there are as British as Wales.
@@OnlyGrafting ¿Cómo explicás que entonces los británicos echaran por la fuerza a los argentinos en 1833?
Utis possidetis makes the island ours. And they always be. And someday they Will join the country where they belonh
@@carinajauregui9383 So glad to read your heartfelt apology for your invasion of our territory, and your recognition that the Falklands are forever British territory.
"jolly well had to be winkled out" only the British
+MacEachainn What what!
SJ NM old boy!?
Can someone get winkled in?
Ha ha only the aristocratic ones
@@tantoismailgoldstein6279: That all depends on ones' sexual orientation I would suppose...
"Never walk on the tail of the tiger 🐯 when he takes a nap", Chinese proverb.
Gilles Guillaumin "don't take what isn't yours" random crackhead down the street
@@loganbaileysfunwithtrains606 and still it would be a great lesson for the Junta
Gilles Guillaumin e
HA, HA...love that quote. I 👍
“You play with feathers, you get your arse tickled!”- Paddy O’Shea.
The English patriotism is very uplifting which is very sensible also in these pictures. It was Great victory a Great liberation!
There are two nations, people’s who can be characterized as: who cannot be subjugated!
The Soviet (which includes the Russian people) and the English people.
The fact that Napoleon, Hitler etc. was unable to oppress them is not exponible only with the fact that it’s very hard to cross the channel and Russia/Soviet Union is very „big” - in my opinion -. The English and Soviet inc. Russian people has something like harder will then diamond, if the Motherland is in danger, in that situation they put everything aside and go on together for the common sacred purpose.
Glory to the liberators of the Falkland Islands!
Mr. Steve Johnson, Thank you for uploading these videos!
Greetings’ from Hungary!
If you are met with the Paras, the Marines, the SBS and the SAS, guess what's going to happen to you.
The Scots Guards fought their best, the 5th Marine infantry battalion on the capture of Mt Tumbledown. They never received the recognition they deserved & are forgotten or worse, not acknowledged by too many. The 5th MBI practiced night fighting for a month prior to the British landings, they were tough determined soldiers & it took nearly 12 hours for the Guards to break them down. The Scots Guards lost 8 men, the Argentinians 30+
@@KeithWilliamMacHendry Those who don't make it into the Scots Guards end up in the Marines or the Paras.
i was in the sas honest
@@KeithWilliamMacHendry Well said, an ex Spr.
And the Gurkhas, Guards and Blues and Royals.
Argentina: These islands are ours by right! *shits on the post office floor*
They should have been made to clean up the island.
Que derechos usurpadas a argentina en 1833 a 14000 km de inglaterra a 400 de argentina en otro continente .pirata ladron
A very moving sermon from the Padre.
@MichaelKingsfordGray regardless if you believe in God, the speech was bloody brilliant. How can it be wrong to say that "remember what was dearest to you when your life could've ended"
rejoice! one of my favorite wars in history. The good guys won.
+decimated550 The bad guys won, look at the British war crimes during the Malay Emergency campaign, Greece, Cyprus and Iraq.
+Argentine Commando Yes and the brutal military junta were the good guys.
+MacEachainn Just like the British Government were the good guys in getting rid of Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein in Libya, Syria and Iraq, starting bloody civil wars in the name of Freedom (all really in the name of petrol), in which hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children have been killed at the hands of the US-British New World Order.
Pablo Nero what are you talking about? Getting rid of Gaddafi and Saddam didn't start the civil wars, the UK didn't even get rid of Gaddaffi that was the people rising up. As for Iraq the civil war only started in 2014 after the UK and US had left and handed over to the Iraq army but yeah it was our fault.
+MacEachainn You must be a young school age kid. Watch "The Iraq War From The Frontline" on youtube and then come back and tell me the British aren't part of the New Evil Empire in the form of the New World Order and didn't start the civil war in Iraq beween Shiites and Sunnis by removing Saddam Hussein who had kept a tight lid on the situation just like Gaddafi in Libya and Assad in Syria. Face it, the current bloodbath in the Middle East is because of petrol and the US-British intervention.
to attack a prepared position one must expect 4 losses for 1 defender but somehow they lost 1 attacker for twice the wankers (not their fault, they were kids), poor guys who fixed bayonets and went mental and won! utter heroes x
+spitroastfor8 Yes but the Brits did not have the courage to assault the Argie positions without first flattening them with 50,000 field & naval artillery & mortar rounds (like the 2,000 mortar shells that saturated Darwin Ridge & the 6,000 field artillery shells needed to take Wireless Ridge).
There wasn't much artillery fire on Goose Green, and the British infantry went through the Argentine defensive positions like knife through butter. There is no excuse, there can be only one conclusion and that is that the British troops were superior.
Jens Danbolt lmao, but actually of Great Britain won this war this already mean they're army is superior in the first place
Las tropas de infantería británica eran mejores, pero siempre atacaron con superioridad numérica local en todos los casos. No se dejen guiar por números totales, sino por los específicos de ataque a cada posición argentina.
+Ramon Esperanza It doesn't matter. If we can make a win easier, why would we not?
Argies had to learn the hard way that the Falkland islands are British. 🇬🇧
They're still crying about it 😂
Meanwhile the Uruguayans are still waiting for the return of Martin Garcia Island in the River Plate from Argentina.
Damn these brits seem to be good at there job
jpaschl we aren’t the best soldiers on earth fora reason
BRITS WON, BUT AT HUGE PRICE ! MALVINAS WAS A SHAME OF YOUR NAVY FORCES, YOUR WORST WRONG WAS CHARGE THE WAR EQUIPMENT IN ARTLQANTICA CONVEYOR SUNK.
INVENCIBLE AIR CARRIER FIRED RECEIVED ONE EXOCET AND 2 BOMBS OF 250 Kg.
@@carlosvalbertovelazquez5500 who the fuck cares anymore? The islanders want to stay under British rule. I know your gonna say BuT tHeY aReN't ThE nAtIvEs bullshit but the US consists of non natives yet they have full control of themselves.
@@theoddster830 ISLANDERS NOT HAS ANY RIGHT TO CHOOSE BECAUSE ORIGINARY RESIDENT PEOPLE WITH ARGENTINE GOVERNOR WAS THROWN OF THE ISLAND IN 1833, DURING THE 4th.BRITISH INVASION AT ARGENTINE TERRITORY.
I think it is a great shame that a dictatorship took Argentina to war and that we were compelled to fight and defeat them in order to restore democracy. I think it was absolutely the right thing to do, but so entirely needless in the first place. That’s why I feel great sorrow at the loss of life on both sides. And just for your information, I am an officer in the Royal Navy and I have been to the Falkland Islands on patrol in 2005. I’ve seen the battlefields and been up tumbledown. It’s a sobering experience and all the blustering armchair generals here need to grow up a little and discover some humanity inside themselves about what was an exceptionally sad affair, when all is said and done.
Thank you for what you did and really, thank you for such an enlightened and true comment. This war was totally unnecessary but caused by the junta. Sad that some idiot in a capital caused a war.
who would have thought that I'd find someone making sense in this sea of stupid and sometimes plain racist comments, I thought I was the only one
Literally everything we have today, our very nations, freedoms, even language depended on a war, at some stage. Whining and complaining about the waste, the horror of war really is a moot point because all you enjoy today, your very existence, the way of life, culture, civilization depended on frankly a war, at some stage. For example, had the Battle of Vienna been lost, or the Battle of Tours, Europe would be Islamic today. To me, those were great victories and wars well worth the fight and price. I am proud of my European ancestors for what they did to save Europe from an Islamic hell. I am not pro-war, but understand reality and sometimes one has no option but to fight or die.
Geralt of Rivia Of course you don’t have the option sometimes between fighting or dying or even fighting AND dying as it happens, but I don’t see things such as civilisation as being dependent on or created by war, rather that they are influenced and shaped by wars. Civilisations aren’t created from wars, because wars don’t create anything in and of themselves; it’s an illogical thing to expect war to produce. It can only eliminate or rule out certain things or directions of travel. It can’t create. Take for example the outcome of this war. Democracy was restored, but the sum total was a loss of life. The essential payment was a loss and the net result was restoration of a pre existing situation. The alternative would have been another loss, the subjugation and eradication of the islanders and the settlement there. So the war stood to produce two outcomes one way or another, but both were losses in the final reckoning. Like surgery that removes living tissue to save the life of the body that it’s connected to, war can’t put anything living back in place of what it removes; it can only stop the rot or spread of disease by cutting out the illness or stitching the wound.
George Morley yeah, the Argentina’s government wanted to distract everyone from their economic issues by invading the falklands
Germany apologised for the war and yet Argentina hasn’t despite painting crosses on military assets and using civilians as human shields
The British claim that Argies planted field guns among the civilian houses during the fighting is all BS. Study the military maps and you''ll see that the 3rd Artillery Group was placed in and around Moody Brook Valley while the 4th Airborne Artillery Group was placed in and around Stanley Racecourse. The 155mm guns were positioned on the slopes of Sapper Hill.
Profoundly Deaf what
Profoundly Deaf and dumb
Not true. The only three civillians dead at war were victims of british fire. And there were not argies around.
Argentine soldiers threated the local population with deep respect.
Argentine marines had orders of no Killing soldiers or civillians when they attacked the Falklands un 1982. And so they did.
Not a single murder nor rape. Remember what the occupation forces in Irak or Afghanistan do to local population in many cases.
Excuse me for My Bad English. Respect and regards from Argentina.
Had family members in the war.
Profoundly Deaf they did, they had Anti-air guns stationed around civilian houses and they painted buildings that housed troops and Ammo with red crosses, so they wouldn’t be targeted
And the Argie's are still butthurt over it.
i served 14 yrs in the UNITED STATES Marine Corps, and am very glad the Brits , esp Royal Marines, are now are allies , cause they are the last fighting force i would want to face.
i grew up as an american child watching this war on tv and found the warfighting extremely interesting and very important world history.
The words spoken by Padre Cooper are nothing short of magnificent. I would have loved to have him as my Chaplain in Iraq. Our guy wasn’t bad but he lacked the beautiful charm and eloquence of this gentleman.
Ours was Frank Collins who was on the Iranian embassy job as a 21 year old, the youngest regiment man on the job. Sadly he gassed himself in his car a while back after he'd been removed from us for writing his book. A great man and not your atypical man of the cloth. I found they were 2 types, the ram it down your throat type or the ones who don't force it but do a brilliant job for morale. Not many atheists in a fighting position
Love British officers understated way of talking, we jolly well had to winkle them out lol
The whole sermon at around 20’ is powerful
God bless the British heroes.
Fighting Force Imperial lackeys I would say.
Tulaenelorto lol do you have a life? you are in EVERY falkland/british videos comment section...
TheJonttux789 more life than a pirate commoner
Tulaenelorto
YARR WE ARE PIRATESSS!
TheJonttux789
enjoy fish and chips
Yup, imperialism is unacceptable. I presume, therefore, that the Argentines will drop their imperialistic claim to the Falkland Islands and then evacuate Argentina itself for their ancestral homelands in Spain, Italy and elsewhere in Europe leaving the Pampas to their original inhabitants..
+Julie & Mark A. I agree as long as your miliitary allies in the form of Canada, the US, Australia, New Zealand and Chile do the same thing and we turn back the clock and leave Britain alone to fight the Second World War and the Falkands.
+Julie & Mark A. OPEN THE FILES BRITAIN!!!! TELL YOUR PEOPLE THE TRUTH!!!!!
ok, then the USA should do the same, Britain itself should evacuate too...We should all go back to Africa, where life started...gimme a break.
Kimberly Williams So many falsehoods in your diatribe. I will restrict myself to correcting you on two. Firstly the Royal Household takes money from no pockets. No taxes are used to cover its expenses. The Household is funded by 15% of the income of the Duchy of Lancaster. Secondly, the Falklands were British long before Argentina was established by Spanish and Italian settlers who pushed the natives off their land. If you are suggesting that the map of the world should revert to the way it looked in 1690, well I would like to warn you that quite a few people might be upset at the prospect.
En realidad Las Malvinas siempre estuvieron bajo la soberanía española, y luego argentina. Los británicos se establecieron en unos pocos años en la isla que ellos llaman Pebble (creo), pero luego fueron expulsados por los españoles en 1770. Y luego se fueron en 1774. La Argentina es sucesora legal de España, bajo varios nombres, Provincias Unidas, Confederación Argentina y República Argentina. Es lo mismo que ocurre con el Reino Unido, cuando ocupa las Malvinas creo que no figuraba Irlanda en el título del país, pero todos sabemos quienes son.
BBC news being pro British and respecting our soldiers... we certainly are living in different times D:
That's because it isn't BBC, it's ITV.
Lol dumbfuck. Are you British. ? Who the fuck doesn’t know big trev is itv
spotted the non-brit
Really?
It's almost a neutral and mildly pro-British. More like, mildly pro-victor.
@phillip hall You're, not _your_ . Tell me again about being British. Learn YOUR own language
My hat's off to 3 Bde. I went down with 5 Bde, as a 'Loggy'. I was cold and wet too, but wasn't expected to 'engage the enemy'. The lads that liberated the Islands deserve massive respect. Well done chaps. And I want to that the Padre for his words.
What is most depressing is the Anglo-Argentine relationship, today - thirty six years later. Contrast it with the Anglo-German relationship: within a decade of WW2, we were NATO allies, educational, cultural and trading partners, sporting rivals that were building a constructive future.
We read here, all the "What ifs" in the conflict - What if these 2 democracies had reconciled themselves in the intervening years? The answer must surely have been peace and prosperity; this dysfunctional relationship (except the sport of Polo and the odd bottle of Malbec) is depressing!
I put to you, the relationship between Germany and the UK, after WW1. Considerably colder than after WW2.
Losing a war does that. It breeds terrible resentment. It happens when the people of a defeated nation still consider that victory would have been justified.
Father to sons, teacher to students. But with each new generation this is slowly going away.
Argentina is a country of moral infants. Slowly growing up. This is undeniable.
The terror attack against the jews in Argentina and their appauling response...
Brazil however, most people never supported Argentinian ambition.
It's the country where all the nazis went to hide... It's one sick puppy.
Terrible place...
@@lucascampos5498 La mayor comunidad de judíos en Latinoamérica, la mayor comunidad de británicos en Latinoamérica. Hospitales y educación pública utilizada por todos los países limítrofes. Alimentamos a Europa durante la WW2. Sin nosotros España, Francia, El reino unido se hubiesen muerto de hambre. Le dimos al mundo la lapicera, el by pass coronario, el diseño moderno del helicóptero, el mejor corredor de Fórmula Uno de la historia y los dos mejores jugadores de fútbol de la historia. Un país corrupto y decadente con grandes problemas internos, eso es innegable No puedo permitir que llames a la Argentina un "lugar terrible" cuando no lo es y mucho menos para los extranjeros.
@@lucascampos5498 Vos no seras Chileno lrcdtrpm no...
way back in 1992 I was at a reception here in Stanley, where Maggie and General Moore both gave a speech. What will always stay with me was a mini bollocking from Maggie at 3 of us in the crowd, as she passed us she stumbled on a beer bottle or something...she told us to 'clear this mess up!' ...absolutely priceless!
I had no idea how scumy the Argentine occupiers had been. AA guns in school yard is the single most cowardly thing I've heard in my life.
makes you proud of the brits
Thanks mate we're always ready.
Make u sick of Brits lol hello from royal hill Tara county Meath Ireland☺
@@paulcarolan8646 there's always one racist in every comment
Paul Carolan fuck Ireland go eat ur potatoes
@@paulcarolan8646 W⚓
As an Argentine myself I would like to say some things.
1. War was a mistake, most stupid mistake that Argentina ever made in terms of intrernational politics. (And we have done really stupid mistakes in this country, so that is a deep low)
2. The falklands/malvinas islanders already made it clear that they prefer being ruled by british. And yes, we can argue about who owned the land 150 years ago, but honestly makes no sense at this point. And even if some believe Argentina deserves to rule the islands right now, aside from what locals want, war was stupid, Argentinian goverment should realized that trying to war against a experienced country like British with such old weapons, bad training for ground forces and everything against the odds was stupid as minimum. Let's be realistic, aside from who owned the islands 150 years ago, the islanders obviously feel more friendly to british, and the stupid war only increased that feeling for sure (basically we fucked it up even more)
3. As Argentine myself, I am patriotic about my country a bit. But don't make the mistake of thinking that goverment is the same thing as the country and its people for me. I dislike all argentine goverments since soooo long. And I do respect anyone who was in the battlefield, british soldiers were fighting for what the believed it was correct, and some young near teen argentinians did too, even if they were brainwashed by the goverment, you must understand that they were between eighteen to twenty years old sometimes, naive and really young. Even if you hate Argentinian goverment for what they did, at least respect the soldiers... as some veterans do by themselves eachother: both, british people and argentinian people, should learn about the veterans instead of hating people who we don't even know.
If some of them were able to forgive their enemy and respect eachother, we should try to.
Respect from Argentina to anyone reading this.
Maradona was the worst with the "hand of god".
Thank you, sir, for your honesty.
"Cold, wet arctic islands"
Britain: we'll take it!
Arctic ?
tristman 84 Britain; I’ll bet 500!
Antarctic
Arctic (and Antarctic) latitudes start at 66.5° from the equator. The Falklands are not close to being antarctic.
@@GH-oi2jf calm down I meant arctic type of weather
In 1982 just before the Falklands conflict loomed, I left the merchant navy. A month later my ship, a RO RO was requisitioned by the British Government and joined the task force, with my relief onboard. Thankfully, though being under attack, both ship and my friend survived and returned home safely. In 1992, I rejoined the merchant navy as a radio officer - my first ship was the Norland. It came as a surprise when on board to learn of its sterling service in the Falklands war. I have great respect for all those who shipped south, not knowing if they would come back. As for myself, I considered myself extremely lucky, lucky that my leave was due and did not find myself caught up in such a bitter conflict.
britain was supported by gurkhas in falkland war..GURKHAS are the bravest of the brave..soilders from ta hilla and mountains of nepal with khukuri in their hands ..
JAY MAHAKALI AAYO GORKHALI
JAY GORAKHNATH
I'm Canadian and I am so proud of the Gurkha tradition. Peace and prosperity for you, friend.
Its true but they choose to fight alongside us noone else
kshitiz sharma served with a gurka reg, for 6 months, great bunch of guys.... And there scoff is amazing 😂😂
They are great people who will always be welcome .
The Gurkhas did not fight on the Falklands.
After more than 42 years, finally I get to see Brigadier General Moore in person albeit thru an also 42 year old documentary.
He was responsible in liberating our town of Limbang in British colony of Sarawak during November or December of 1962.
Thank you General Sir for liberating Limbang AND the Falklands 20 years later.
Although it hurts, I am very grateful that Argentina is surrendered, I would not have liked that Buenos Aires ends as Hiroshima, I am very sorry for the loss of both sides
What he says at 4:05 sums up why Britain rarely loses wars while always maintaining an image of being weak and unprepared. They throw together whatever they can find in the garden shed to keep the enemy at bay, make deals and alliances with the right people and quietly but effectively undermine their enemies while waiting for their arrogance to get the better of them. They understand the pitfalls of this arrogance from firsthand experience - when they were at the height of their power they used to suffer embarrassing defeats as well.
Very interesting comment.
You wouldnt believe the crap in my garden shed but i reckon it would come in handy if the germans kicked off again
Being ex-army we are used to having shoddy kit,shit officers but we are ingenious,resolute and aim to get the task done.
LONDON (AP) _ Britain would not have recaptured the Falkland Islands from Argentina in 1982 without U.S. military assistance, former U.S. Navy Secretary John Lehman was quoted Sunday as saying.
In a British Broadcasting Corp. television interview to be broadcast Wednesday night, Lehman also says U.S. involvement in the Falklands war led indirectly to the Irangate scandal, the Observer newspaper reported.
The weekly said Lehman’s interview will be included in the latest episode of ″An Ocean Apart,″ a BBC documentary series on British-American relations.
″Britain would have had to have withdraw from the Falklands″ if the Reagan administration withheld support, it quoted Lehman as saying.
U.S. military aid in the 74-day war, in which Britain recaptured the South Atlantic archipelago from invading Argentine forces, has been a closely guarded secret, the Observer said.
″Lehman is the first senior U.S. official to claim that the Pentagon’s supplies of intelligence and material were so great as to have been decisive,″ it said.
God save the Queen.
God Bless the Falklands.
We will Remember the Falkland Islanders and H.M. Forces killed in the conflict. 🇬🇧
i hope the british army struck home to the argies a lesson about cleanliness
pickneydem yes friend , they should , just to clean the earth of some scambags trying to do something stupid, like throwing themselves against mortal machine gun fire
10:15
Using the floor as lavatory.
Stay classy, Argentina!
Local fireman Lewis Clifton describes how the sanitation system of Port Stanley broke under the strain of accommodating & processing 1000s of British soldiers & Argie POWs suffering from diarrhea:
"The place just couldn't take it. There was only sporadic electricity and water and the sanitation system collapsed. The streets were ankle-deep in human waste. The stench was awful, really awful, and we were all suffering from what we called Galtieri's revenge. He lost the war but left us ill."
(Occupation of the Falkland Islands, WIKIPEDIA)
came here for the salty Argies
i found em OMEGALUL
ua-cam.com/video/EChlMvuJqDA/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/OAzI5JnIie0h/v-deo.htmlttps://ibb.co/jNwZFK
ua-cam.com/video/WnOyCLC9LzI/v-deo.htmlibb.co/btSKhz
ua-cam.com/video/wY_6k5_35QE/v-deo.htmlibb.co/kSXkNz
ibb.co/gzBc5U
ibb.co/ndvgX9
ibb.co/m3Z3ep
ibb.co/gjM1vK
ibb.co/ka4bUe
ibb.co/gBR1vK
ibb.co/hsLi9e
ibb.co/iKkuFK
ibb.co/jyBehz
ibb.co/c4pX2z
ibb.co/e16ZFK
ibb.co/byEMvK
ibb.co/mXjbUe
ibb.co/fFGehz
ibb.co/njtfLK
ibb.co/iVhKhz
ibb.co/f29bUe
ibb.co/nj9zhz
ibb.co/jwf5nz
ibb.co/d105Nz
ibb.co/e6ubUe
ibb.co/jwf5nz
ibb.co/dHCKhz
ibb.co/nLUX2z
ibb.co/kQWO9e
ibb.co/jdGC2z
ibb.co/gNhkNz
ibb.co/eqXKhz
ibb.co/jm4oaK
ibb.co/jBkGUe
ibb.co/j4pbUe
ibb.co/e4eMvK
ibb.co/ctFGUe
ibb.co/cT3EFK
ibb.co/niqGUe
ibb.co/jdGC2z
ibb.co/iPmqpe
ibb.co/cba5Nz
ibb.co/hWJgvK
ibb.co/k6OEFK
ibb.co/dxS8aK
ibb.co/cJ61vK
ibb.co/m4L5Nz
ibb.co/fsVN2z
ibb.co/h7XD9e
ibb.co/eS3aNz
ibb.co/c1HD9e
ibb.co/jc7D9e
ibb.co/nb8yaK
ibb.co/bCuFNz
ibb.co/jNgt4p
ibb.co/hBHpc9
ibb.co/nrNNx9
ibb.co/eNJvH9
Bill Kerman they got their revenge in 86 when they stole the World Cup from you guys...
@@Pablo-wf6ev get a life
the argie officers were shooting they own men in the legs to stop them running away. the men that were dug in.
What didn't that horrible fascist government do? They couldn't even be good at war talk about a fail fascism xD. Thanks to Britain for defeating these scum and yet always behaving with such excellent gallantry and discipline. There are lots of groups of armed men out there, there are very few "armies". UK army is always respected. -from Canada.
Did you know it was mostly the Nazi regime responsible for this in Argentina?...descendants of the third Reich from Germany.
@@lifeisa.smalllesson333 thanks for that Aaron
@@lifeisa.smalllesson333 Italian, actually.
I would have made them clean up , their own crap .
I remember this all unfolding while at secondary school, our history teacher let us watch the news and read the papers in class. It was surreal, Britain at war in my lifetime...very strange. Of course we have other conflicts since but, to be so young and the only other wars/conflicts were told by grandparents , uncles etc.
Later in life I read and watched about the Falklands again and was shocked really at how the Argentinian troops looked after surrendering. They didn't want to be there, just conscripted lads with basic training and a officer corps that was, in some places, rotten in how it treated the them.
The Junta gambled and failed in that the UK would do nothing...professional soldiers through and through. I have spoken to many US soldiers who served with UK forces and all have said they would work with and fight with British soldiers any time and knew they could depend on them in a firefight also they had a very high respect for UK officers.
As has been stated, many Argentinian people are/were good and were treated with fear under terrible governments for many years...the Falklands was one too many. Although the democratic governments in power still rattle their sabres over the Falkland islands at times, I think a lesson has been learned...leave alone.
To be fair to the Argie officers & NCOs, Lieutenant Chris Caroe from X-Ray Coy 45 Commando spoke highly of them when he explained that although the defenders his platoon encountered on Southern Two Sisters were mainly conscripts “they were a force to be reckoned with because they were led by skilled regulars.” www.cheshire-live.co.uk/news/chester-cheshire-news/ex-marine-chris-caroe-chester-recalls-5179719
Lieutenant Clive Dytor whose platoon took part in the fighting for the Northern Two Sisters confirms this view when he mistook the ordinary conscripts and NCOs for hardened enemy marines, “The Argentine marines all fought to the end and were killed with bullets and bayonets. We had to fight through lots of positions, clearing the enemy." web.archive.org/web/20120427180020/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/falklandislands/9164691/Falklands-War-hero-explains-why-he-entered-the-church-after-being-awarded-the-Military-Cross.html
@@vivaseineldin I do agree, many were very good soldiers led by well trained regulars and NCO's and officers. However, I do think that many Argentine soldiers felt bewildered and unsure of what to do. You look at the faces of the surrendering UK troops at Government house, disappointment, humiliation yet a steely look in their eyes that this wasn't over. The same look in the eyes of the Argentine troops and officers does not show the same-they look defeated. I have read that, the same as you that many UK soldiers, pilots, officers, naval personnel all said that they admired the resistance that was given and the bravery shown.
@@eddiesolo1971 The great problem of the war is that Argentina only planned the recapture of the islands, and a hypothetical subsequent negotiation. It was never thought of going to war against the United Kingdom. That is why the total improvisation of the defense, and the fact of sending troops from a subtropical zone to a place with a sub-Antarctic climate. The troops in principle were "symbolic" and were not intended to fight. Even the III Infantry Brigade crossed to the islands without their heavy equipment.
I feel sorry for the young conscripts. Only just legal adults.
If you scroll back up (PC) or down (mobile) you will see the death toll, some of the British were only 17.
"...What was "loosely" described as negotiations..."
Savage.
Yes we made mistakes but we'll done lads iam proud of our boys. R. I. P to those who gave there everything👏👏👏
Not forgotten. Our troops are the BEST of the BEST. If you doubt it, try them..
Con la ayuda de Estados Unidos y la otan
The British are a remarkable people. Grateful they are our allies. Cheers from 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
The people, not their barbaric empire. They executed some wounded soldiers, killed 3 islanders and destroyed the Bolivian economy because they helped Argentina
@scaraboo3624 No proof of any executions, and the friendly fire was accidental. Argentina on the other hand forcibly displaced islanders from their homes, threatened them, and trapped bombs to toys.
@@scaraboo3624Also fuck Bolivia lol shouldn't have supported the losers
@@scaraboo3624🇬🇧🇬🇧
I just wish we had a priest of the quality of David Cooper as the Archbishop of Canterbury!
I think it was criminal of the Argentine leadership to send those young conscripts in there like that.
Surely their intelligence services must have had some clue of what the professional British forces were going to do when they landed in the Falklands. Those conscripts never stood a chance.
But one thing is for sure... credit where credit is due...the Argentine naval and air force pilots showed their metal.
I've read that as far as they were concerned, their mission was to save their comrades on the ground and they sure fought hard. Hats off.
Argie conscripts forced two Para companies to retreat in the morning fighting at Goose Green. Argie conscripts also forced 3 PARA to retreat halfway through the Battle of Mount Longdon.
The Junta didn't really expect Britain to fight at all. They thought the invasion would force some kind of negotiated settlement that would eventually give them sovereignty of the Islands. By the time they realised their mistake it was too late to withdraw their troops, Argentine public opinion made that politically impossible. So they found themselves fighting a war that they just weren't mentally prepared for and couldn't cope with.
An argie general wrote a letter of thanks for bringing down the brutal junta, who to tortured and dropped into the ocean 1000 plus people in Argentina.
@EddieExile but the "tiny" carriers hold two complete squadrons of Harriers less than 100 miles from the islands, moving to a different location at the end of each day, thus making then untracebale, whilst the argentinian bases where fixed airstrips at triple the distance always having the same attack pattern and only permitting 10 minutes of operational flight over the island for their combat jets.
Well done brave men. I salute you.
Galtieri: - Estoy lidiando con una pesadilla económica y un creciente malestar civil
No se preocupen chicos, voy a arreglar esto
Lo sé, comenzaré una guerra y seré popular durante dos meses.
Siempre pasa lo mismo....crear una distracción para que el pueblo se olvide de sus problemas internos
Fascinating interview - I suppose that this was on News at Ten on 14 June 1982. I have never seen anything like this before - excellent material.
my gun commander sgt brown was 29 commando royal artillery in the Falkland they wore out there barrel's of there 105mm
14:07 "A defeated army, returning to their mother land." Man that's humiliating with the ARG troops just behind the reporter.
@Eddieposted - But I think Armi means that the surrender involved only the forces in the Falklands. It did not involve giving up the claims. I remember that there was some time of uneasiness after surrender. That was the reason why 600 Ar. POWs were sent home only after a month.
Back in the day when it was just a fight, could they imagine the shit we had today, my service was simply walking around Pristina, which to be honest was more enjoyable than being at home, I really wouldn't fancy doing what our lads do today.
Major Guillermo Berazay. "I often spoke with a lady who's house we used. When the shelling started, she said she would not be talking to me again but she wanted to say this. Geographically this may be considered part of Argentina, but this small boy is the fifth generation born here. We feel that the country belongs to us, not England, not Argentina, because we were born here, we live here and as you can see I am 40 years old but look 60, life here is hard but nobody has ever cared for us."
You are right about that. Fifth or sixth generation of a kelper. Against a third generation of Argentines.
God save the queen
Argentina 0 United Kingdom 1. End of story.
Argentina 2 uk 1 1806 1807 2 derrotas de uk en buenos aires las malvinas seran argentinas
Me párese que te equivocas..no te acordás cuando los sacaron cagando del continente con aceite caliente..UD si no fuera x los aliados perdían todas las guerras..y fíjate en Malvinas..con aviones viejos..y grandes pilotos le infierno media flota..y se querían rendir..con barcos modernos..me párese si pones en la balanza las pérdidas no se quién perdió...las Malvinas se encuentran en la plataforma continental Argentina x lo tanto es Argentina x derecho..y UD la usurparon..infórmate más..y mira los videos ingleses
You only gained independence in 1816 relax
@@dariomariotti4527 jaaaa apoco todavia les arde el culo de la violada que les dieron los ingleses....
And a rematch in 1986 with a different outcome lol...
Best head line I have ever seen on the front of a news paper was when the belgrano was sunk the headline said GOTCHA
Pun?
It was a disgraceful headline. The sinking of the Belgrano may have been necessary, and it was certainly legitimate, the Belgrano was an enemy warship on an aggressive war cruise, but that kind of crowing over the deaths of more than 300 young men is both shameful and sickening. That headline must have been written by a civilian because no sailor would ever have written something so crass.
@@sirderam1 Was the Sinking of the HMS Sheffield Legitimate?
@@josedro
Yes, Jose, it was. Have you ever heard anyone complain that it wasn't?
@Justin Time
Yes, I'm aware of that. The two destroyer escorts (ironically British built) sailed away immediately for fear they would be torpedoed too. Unfortunately many of those who had survived the sinking of the Belgrano had died of exposure before they returned.
The Argentine Navy didn't exactly cover itself in glory during that war!
Interesting documentary. At the end it gets interrupted (in a rather dramatic moment, BTW). Where is the continuation?
I don't know so can someone at ITV do a bit of checking and finding pl.
big ups nepal
In the early 2000's I traveled briefly through Argentina, loved it, very friendly people, and wish them no ill will. However, in 1982, they didn't know who they were fucking with. Tip of the hat to all the lads who gave their lives or were maimed in a just cause.
Argentines generally like the British. We have no personal problem with them. There is a part of the Argentine territory usurped by the United Kingdom since 1833. That is a serious political problem.
@@carinajauregui9383 Surely Argentina only came into being as a nation in 1861 after period of war. How can it yours if you didn't exist when Britain came to the islands. just because you're close to place does not make yours.
@@alanjjeff It's a misunderstanding. Argentina had its first government of its own from May 25, 1810, and declared its independence (a formality) on July 9, 1816. You confuse the existence of Argentina with the consolidation of a National State (in case you are interested , that was achieved only in 1880)
For what interests us, Argentina existed at the time the British usurped the Malvinas on January 3, 1833, and the Argentine flag was lowered, not another.
@@carinajauregui9383 But that 1810 declaration was not for the Argentina but open the fight for the creation of Argentina. Its formal creation was not internationally accepted until 1861 when the country became a federation along the borders recognised today. This did not exercise a claim for the Falkland islands/ las Malvinas. The British claim to sovereignty dates from 1690, when they made the first recorded landing on the islands.
Spain did make claims that the Falkland Islands were to held under provisions in the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht which settled the limits of the Spanish Empire in the Americas. However, the treaty only promised to restore the territories in the Americas held prior to the War of the Spanish Succession. The Falkland Islands was not held by Spain at the time and were not mentioned in the treaty.
This treaty would be the sole claim by Spain and its successors that could be considered. But as the island were already claimed by Britain this 1713 Spanish claim failed. You may feel that Viceroyalty of the River Plate claimed the Falklands in 1811 but whilst this covered part of Argentina it was not a pre-argentine government and its claim was based on the previous Spanish Claim.
@@alanjjeff Hello Alan.
Some corrections: Argentina was recognized by the United Kingdom in 1825 (by the way, your country did not make any reservations about the Malvinas where Argentina already exercised sovereignty)
Argentina took formal possession of the islands on November 6, 1820 without any formal complaint from the United Kingdom (which, as I told you, 5 years later recognized Argentine independence)
The British claim to FULL sovereignty over the islands dates back to 1829. Until that time the British only claimed Pebble and Saunders Islands.
In 1690 James Strong landed on the islands, BUT DID NOT CLAIM SOVEREIGNTY (that is a recent invention of British propagandists)
Spain has always exercised control of its possessions, including the Austral Sea (South Atlantic). Utrecht only recognized the Spanish sphere of influence (supported by the British who did not want the French to interfere in the Spanish Empire now that the same royal family ruled in both countries)
The United Kingdom did not claim the islands, but settled in Port Egmont in 1765, but the French were already in Port Luis (1764), and recognized Spanish sovereignty in 1766. In short, the British were late to claim possession, and late to claim sovereign rights.
Greetings
10:45 The Argentine's cause was not helped by them deliberately placing guns and missiles between civilian houses, knowing how loath the British would be to fire back at them. They placed their Anti-Aircraft guns in the school playground. They used schools as weapons dumps and painted buildings housing military, as hospitals. They knew of course that the red cross is the international symbol of immunity.
"There must be something in the Geneva convention or some such code of war, that forbids it!"
And yet the British media completely ignore when Hamas do all of the above and much worse in Gaza to civilians. How they fire indiscriminately at Israeli civilians and place their missile launchers between apartment buildings, using their own people as human shields to protect these terrorists. How they use hospitals as weapons dumps and buildings housing the press as military headquarters.
Somehow, in the eyes of the BBC, Sky, ITV, Channel 4 and the online media, it is one rule for Argentina and another for Hamas.
Hence I no longer pay for a BBC TV license and refuse to watch their output. The corporation is run by Corbyn loving anti-semites. The only news article from the region recently was about a Gaza farmer finding an ancient statue and a Russion talking bollocks about Hitler being Jewish. Nothing about indiscriminate terrorist attacks on Israelis.
And no, I am neither Israeli or Jewish, just a chap that believes a news organisation funded by the British people should be impartial in every way.
@@WessexWilder ה' יברך אותך
The BBC, Sky ITV and every other left wing agenda fake news channel supports Hamas.
At my 6th birthday General Berlgrano was sunk I never understood this war. So much British influence in Argentina.
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN
Neanderthales ...yet,,,????
Estuvieron a una semana de perder los estribos jajajaj que vergüenza que un país de primer mundo le tome tanto!! Ni uds podían creerlo
@@xaviervalenziano7872 if you believe that the you are as deluded as the murderous argentine junta of 1980s, the war was won the day the mighty Belgrano met its fate at the hands of one British submarine, Harriers sealed the juntas fate. remember the same argentine junta that stole children from distraught parents who dared to speak out and threw innocent argentine people from helicopters into the perishing sea, the same sea where the fleeing cowardous argentine navy left all them brave sailors of the Belgrano to die in the cold sea, however good prevailed over the evil occupying argentine forces were soundly beaten on their own doorstep in a fight Argentina started, and now peace ensues yet again over the Glorious Falkland Islands....GOD SAVE THE QUEEN.....SALUTE THE CONQUERER....HAIL TO THE HARRIER
@@ashyk72 están peleando por un territorio que esta a más de 13mil km !! Como van a pelear por una tierra que no es de uds manada de piratas!! No te das cuenta que uds precisaron ayuda de Estados Unidos y Chile para vencer a un país de tercer mundo?
@@ashyk72 en todo caso habla que uds empezaron el conflicto hundiendo al general Belgrano fuera de la zona de exclusión uds empezaron esa guerra!! Anda que yo te saqué de tu casa a trompadas!! Y usé tu heladera no seas imbécil desde 1833 que uds ocupan esas islas!! Lee sobre las invasiones inglesas la primera y la segunda!! Los sacamos cagando
Hi Steve Johnson, Just out of curiosity, how did you find these old videos? Are you going through your old video tapes?
At the time of this the British military man for man was the finest military on the planet
They still are
Up the British!!
Wellington also said of his troops, 'They may not frighten the enemy, but by God they frighten me'.
jugamos sucio...y nos fue mal en Goose Green y Darwin, por eso nos ganó un enemigo muy superior y verdaderamente organizado!!!
No jugamos sucio no fuimos a 15000 km de nuestra tierra a sacarle la isla a otro pais x herencia española son argentinas a 500 km de nuestro territorio
Democracy, (of a sort) returned to Argentina courtesy of the British forces. They didnt just liberate the islands they gave the Argentinian people their country back...
Nice from the padre, read the book from Mike Curtis 'onder vuur' in dutch, it was exactly what he has written, full church and he lost his mate steve. Sad..
I served alongside the Canadians in Bosnia - as a Military Policeman. Top blokes and they really wack up an awesome breakfast! God bless the Canadians :)))
Canadians?.... These are the Brits mate, The Greatest Military/ Army to ever exist!
Love watching this!!!
what a great sermon by the Para's Padre!
Man for man the British produce THE best, most effective and bravest soldiers .Thats how we took over 1/3 of the world with a country the size of New York. But hand to hand combat is in the past and makes us as about effective as Sweden now. But id just love no war again and full bellies for all.
I am surprised that the entrenched enemy still falls for the old unexpected surprise by the back door tactic. Hannibal, the Arden, Korea ect...
Don't forget the British at Singapore in WW2
In 1953 I was serving in the flagship of the American and West Indies squadron. a light cruiser. An Argentine frigate was reported as sniffing around the Falklands so we had to go down there to chase them away. They wisely legged it pretty quickly after it was made known that we were on our way and we sat in the harbour at Port Stanley for a couple of weeks just in case they came back.
padre david cooper seems like a very admirable person
America : Its impossible to re-take those islands
Britain : Hold my beer
Can't thank these brave. Boys enough. ❤️
Some of the crew of HMS HECLA with the casualties they were repatriating via Montevideo. Silver sulfadiazine dressing bags for hand burns are visible. Army casualties have been issued temporary clothing to replace their burnt uniforms. (Crown Copyright)
* Video: ua-cam.com/video/EChlMvuJqDA/v-deo.html
Why are so many of the prisoners still carrying weapons???
That is freaking disgusting they were shitting on the floors wtf. Where did they get their soldiers from???
From the fucking caves.
lum otaku It is a problem with every Army in the fired, they don't have portie potties. A sewage system designed for 3 or 4 thousand folks can't handle 12 thousand folks. So Armies resort to ground latrines. However, pissing on the post office floor isn't nice or healthy.
argentain soldiers were actually 18 y/o boys who were forced to fight because we were on a dictatorship, if you didn't want to fight they will kill you and your family. These "freaking disgusting" argentain soldiers never used a weapon before, because they weren't trained to fight.
Only 50% the other 50% were regs and SF.
We won.
You no