Footage of a Tense Aerial Battle During the Falklands War
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 тра 2017
- It's 10 weeks into the Falklands War, and two British Harriers find themselves protecting damaged ships. Suddenly, Argentine Skyhawks appear on the horizon and a fight ensues.
From the Series: Air Warriors
bit.ly/2p8p21q - Розваги
This narrator sounds like he should be narrating World's Wildest Police Videos or something...
Now the pilot flies into a residential area!
Or one of those Crash videos "and ...they walked away !"
Hahahaha very witty
Or "When animals attack"
thats why British narrators are much better
The pilot David Morgan and the Argentine pilot Pipi Sanchez who fought in the air, made a reunion between both pilots in the nineties. The Argentine pilot traveled to England to visit him. In an interview he said that he wanted to meet David Morgan, because for our Argentine pilot he had respect for the English pilot. After all, both sides lost friends. It was just mutual respect between pilots.
I was there, stuck in Mendoza. They flew us out to Santiago Chile on the last day of the war!
@@samsonwilkinson8090 Where are you from?
@@thesolitary18 Hermano I was born in Liverpool England. I love your people very much. I now live in Thailand since 24 years.
You can find me on Facebook. As Sam Wilkinson or look for Sam Wilko.
Hasta pronto.
Sam
@@samsonwilkinson8090 how did you end from Liverpool to Mendoza?xD
@@joaquinfonseca4858 Music!
I travelled to many places around the world playing guitar and singing.
The Empire Strikes Back. I had the great privilege of actually seeing a British Harrier. I really love the sleek black paint job on it, it looks very dynamic and advanced for the time.
I miss Harriers, they used to fly over my village every few days on training flights near Yeovilton airbase. One of them crash landed in a field which my Dad watched but sadly I was not born at that point as it must have been awesome. The displays they sued to do with Harriers at air shows were amazing, hovering around and pitching up and down like helicopters, then zipping off. Amazing stuff.
The empire strikes back 😂
Biked past a Harrier base in Wales , summer of '82. They would come close to landing then take off.
@Silver spoon why was Britain fighting for it's fellow countrymen thousands of miles away? Because of principal, against a murderous regime, also looking at the bigger picture, this was at the height of the cold war, if the Russians thought that Argentina could walk over Britain then so could they, we had to send a message that you don't fk with the Brits!
@Silver spoon After Argentina invaded the Falklands, the entire British population had their blood up, they were demanding argentine scalps thick and fast, anything but complete and utter humiliation of Argentina would have been more controversial than going to war.
Britain was seeing red, and ready to have Argentina flayed alive.
its not a consolation prize for Britain, it was a kick up the arse, and Britain had to show the world, if you kick Britain up the arse, you will be torn limb from limb, and laughed at while it happens.
it was a consolation prize for Argentina, a propaganda stunt, an artificial enemy to unite against. Argentina has no grounds for a legitimate claim to the Falkland islands whatsoever, both Spain and France have stronger grounds for a claim, but as the Falkland's were discovered by an English ship in 1690, the first humans ever to set foot on the islands were English, the British people are the native population, arguably more so than in Great Britain itself.
Argentina just has its own dreams of colonialism, pure hypocrisy.
This is probably the most mordern footage of Jet vs jet combat
There's newer footage from the Gulf War and maybe others
Thinking the same...
Send the footage through a link if anyone finds it.
@Alexander Perkins I don't believe any of those countries have engaged in dogfights with one another recently, the Russians are supporting the Syrian government and the F-22 has no air-to-air combat history
Alexander Perkins yes legitimate government that massacres its own people and other minorities. You forgot to put that there in your comment.
"Straight up the guy's jet pipe"
British navy.
Our British cousins do have a way with words.
@Demo LmFao!!
"They don't like it up 'em"
Negative. Royal Navy!
They don't speak english
They speak royal navy
I am Argentine and I must say that this war was terrible for both sides especially for both countries that were getting well, I like the UK and I hope to return soon, a greeting to all English and I hope our relationship improves
@deloreandmc85 Go fuck yourself. May the UK-Argentina relationship strengthen.
Sky Blu our relationship is fine just don’t do something that stupid again
And Australia belongs to UK
So refreshing to hear this. Absolutely excellent.
@deloreandmc85
Andate a la Reputisima yegua que te pario.
Proud brit here, but I will say there was a lot of respect for the Argentine pilots. They were exceptionally skilled fighter pilots and were well respected
Proud if what? You invaded a forgein territory.
I'm from Argentina and the two war veterans I've met had nothing but respect towards the british soldiers. Argentine airforce fought with balls
@@manuelmdemarcoit's not very often an Argentine says the truth from the back teeth he has..ive know problem with a man like you.. it's the flintstones that are brain dead that frustrate me
Exploits like those of the Argentine pilot Owen Crippa will never be equaled, like that day when he attacked the English fleet alone with an old Aermacchi MB 339 that only had 30-millimeter cannons and 5-inch Zunni rockets.
For what exactly are you proud of? Colonialism?
Apparently, a burglar was more interesting to the writers of The Crown than this whole conflict.
I had high hopes this would be featured, but alas, it wasn't. 😔
Is it not featured ? Been looking forward to that 🙄
It was briefly mentioned but it was not shown much screen time because the crown had nothing to do with it
@@saamkapadia apart from Prince Andrew serving as an active Sea King pilot onboard the HMS Invincible during the war.
@@saamkapadia Yeah that's patently not true.
As a Russian, I really admire British Engineering. Harrier is a beautiful bird.
Russia has a lot to be proud of too bro, sorry we have this animosity right now. Russia's history is truly magnificent you guys are hardcore. Respect from the UK
And one fitting of the Russian philosophy of rugged aircraft, fit for purpose, and able to be employed from rough or unprepared strips. Russian admiration for it was clear from the Yak 38 Forger. In return, I've always found the Su27 family to be particularly attractive machines, especially the twin seaters, and the Mig 31 is a complete beast and engineering marvel too.
Appreciate the compliment to our engineers. Russian engineering is extremely impressive as well in my opinion. Russia has brought many important technologies to the world, thank you.
As a Brit, I can honestly say that I think your SU-27 is equally as beautiful. Probably the best looking Fighter Jet in the World.
@Big Boss Not true. An AH-1 shot down a MIG-21 during the Iran-Iraq War.
from what I've read British pilots had respect for the Argentine pilots for their bravery in action.
Nobody wants to claim they put their life on the line to fight an unworthy opponent.
henerymag Of course they do, Argentinean pilots were suicidals... Imagine going with those shitty A-4 against the Harriers...
Nima Akhtar Khavari Speed-wise, there’s not much difference, weapon emplacements too. But I’d take the Harrier any day.
the A4 is an awesome aircraft and highly agile and can hold its own in a fight - the problem was that you cannot stay on a harriers tail with its vtol and its ability to decelerate rapidly - it was new tech at the time and no one was trained to fight them brave maybe, skillful not
"Sharkey" Ward had much respect for the Argentine pilots, and states that as they came in to attack the ships in San Carlos water the first ship they would pick out was the Canberra but as it was painted white they assumed it was a hospital ship and wasted valuable seconds searching for another target.
The Vulcan bombing of the runway was the greatest logistics feat ever executed.
It really was it proved during the day of the nuclear bomber we could hit any corner of the earth.
Man i love British engineering ,you Brits had one awesome Bird back then!!..very attractive,love watching it come into land on your carrier fleet decks!...well done guys..Big respect...
My grandad was an engineer in RAF witering the American bought a tone of them
An excellent plane and an excellent missile. Thank the yanks for that.
@TJ Bell the missile
Thank you....USMC and the RAF always cooperated to great mutual benefit with the Harrier.
We have the Typhoon now, probably the best dog fighter in the world but not great for a multirole purpose like the harrier. Hopefully the F35 can live up to it's grandfather reputation
My Dad flew RAAF Mirage IIIs at the time here in Australia. Apparently during the war they gave every bit of info over to the RAF/RN on the capabilities off the Mirage III and even flew specific mission profiles that were informally requested by their UK mates to get a better understanding of what the Mirage III could do. At the time his squadron had a couple RAF exchange people.
Interesting. I never knew Australia flew Mirages. I guess that's before you upgraded to the hornet? Most of Argentina's interceptors were Israeli built copies of the Mirage 5 (aka Dagger), but they definitely had a few Mirage IIIs. I think once they got to the Falklands they had about 3 minutes worth of fighting time if they wanted enough fuel to get back to the mainland.
We had mostly Mirage iii, we had a fe Mirage V, but most of those came from Peru.
The bulk of the airforce used A-4s, and the armada used the Super Etendars and A-4s.
@@Coyote27981 Yeah range wasn't a strong point of the Mirage III. The RAAF had over 100 and they were only really useful based out of Buttersworth in Malaysia. The A-4s were also operated by the Royal Australian Navy at the time of HMAS Melbourne so I'm sure they did the same to help the RN. I think most of those (very brave and daring) raids from the A-4s were from the Argentine mainland though no?
I was serving in the army during the time of the war and there were rumours going about that we Australians might become involved if it carried on for longer than it did.
@@goodshipkaraboudjan I was just about to ask about Butterworth. 75 Squadron? I was 2 Sig in Melbourne when this started and knew a few pussers on HMAS Melbourne. They say their flying officers were keen to team up with the Brits, all flying A4's. Problem was Melbourne was weeks away from decommission and not sea worthy. I am sure we shared everything but manpower. Even the Navy Officers on secondment with RN were recalled.
As a former soldier myself, I have to say that we were always taught to respect the soldiers on the other side. They also have a job to do and at the end, it's the same job as ours. You just hope to do your job a little better than the other side.
That largely depends on the conduct and ideology of the opposing forces. We have no respect for ISIS or al Qaeda militants because of their barbarity, and the same was true for many of the forces in WWII. Their was deep seated hatred at play. In a modern limited war like the Falklands between two professional militaries that conducted themselves with honor and decency it's much easier.
We destroy de boats with old tecnology
@@the_huevito1033 SHUT
@@benitoperez8884 ow your ofended for s reallity
A job to do?, killing people is a job?
Brilliant aircraft flown by outstanding pilots 🇬🇧
Waaaaayyyy laaadd
This is fabricated
CD they gave us guns, not planes
Andy c agreed respect to our American cousins 👍
@@Zackislivid they gave us neither, they sold us sidewinders, which are missiles. Turns out they were excellent at shooting down the American and French planes.
If you know someone who was involved for the UK in the Falklands War, please let them know that in the UA-cam comments section (and on the internet in general) there is huge gratitude and amazement for what they did. I was only 3 yrs old in 1982 and I’m now binge watching videos about it all. The sacrifice that our armed forces made was immense and it will NEVER be forgotten.
My grandad did. He served in the army for about 50 years but I never got to meet him
Both sides showed great talent and efficiency in combat
I’m now 64….it only seems like yesterday………..
Is that a joke ??
"Sacrifice" ?? What sacrifice ??
@@adambane1719: FFS, here we go.
Although us brits can be proud of this accomplishment, sadly we lost over 200 brave soldiers with many maimed for life, we also have to remember the Argentinian conscripts who were forced into this war by the ruling junta and didn't have a clue what they were doing or up against with our fantastic and highly professional military. Sure Argentina had their elite forces, but this was a pointless war brought on by the Argentinian military Junta and they lost, Argentina is a better place without them in power, I cant help feeling sad for both sides who were killed and maimed due to old and decrepit war mongers of Argentina.
Richywah Best comment by far amidst some real dross.
No, probably he's proud that refugees think his country is worth coming to.
Tim Murphy is he proud that his country is americas little b1tch
I always see that metaphor when someone is envious. It shows how your mind works: that one is either the dog or the bitch. Thank God that there are some civilised people around who don't think that way or we'd be living in hell.
Ah a troll. As usual can't progress beyond swear words. Boring.
thank you to the pilots for their bravery . i am ex WELSH GUARDS one of the ships they where protecting was the SIR GALAHAD . we had massive losses ,but if it wasnt for the bravery of these men it could have been far worse . CYMRU AM BYTH .
Cymru Am Byth!
CYMRU AM BYTH ! :)
Cymru am byth!
If only the ✈️ ✈️ were there a tad sooner..
@@Aeronaut1975 Perhaps if Welsh MP Teddy Rowland hadn't abused parliamentary privilege to inform the Argentinians we could read their codes, all those Welsh lives may not have been lost. They changed them immediately costing the British a huge intelligence advantage. Of course Blair made him a lord for his act of treachery - putting Labour ambitions (they wanted Thatcher to lose “her” war) ahead of the lives of his countrymen.
I understand the Sidewinder version we used on our Sea Harriers was your very latest or advanced version, which had significant advantages over previous models.
So, thanks guys, for the use of.
You’ll understand we couldn’t return all of them in pristine condition…
This has got to be the best aerial combat footage I've ever seen :
You can clearly see what's happening, and all details of the shoot downs.
I think it's compiled from all over the place, but in a very skillful way.
there is no areal combat in this vide, you are seeing footage of the ships , SAM action.. the harriers would not venture in the SAM envelope to not confused SAM targetting.
the NAS 801 harriers got the argies on egress and made em jettison their ordnance
NAS800 off Hermes always intercepted from High cap and was to late. they had to back off, let the SAM's do their work, the argies do their bombing and then shot em on egress..
the harriers in this video are random bits of footage, not Air to air combat.
The description says that a fight ensued..... seems more like the Skyhawks just ran into a Harrier shaped fist.
....the Harriers were also equipped with the US made AIM-9L Sidewinder missile ( All aspect infrared ) which made the battle more like shooting fish in a barrel. Had the Skyhawks had decent air coverage from the radar equipped Mirages and with decent Long Range Air to Air Missiles, the battle might have been the Harrier's epitaph!
Of course...the weapons system is only as good as the training of the operator. However, the AIM-9L was the first "All Aspect" IR missile which greatly aided the Harrier Pilots; in that they did not HAVE to get into a rear aspect shot, but could shoot from a head to head engagement or side aspect engagement. And yes, it was a total air/land/sea campaign. However, it always helps in the end game to win a conflict if you can knock out 1 leg of that triad! having total command of the air means one does not have to worry about troops being bombed / strafed and ships sunk because of CLOSE IN anti-ship missiles!
Rubbish, the AIM-9L was in it's very early days, in fact the yanks helped with adjusting coding of the seeker. It's head on lock was near useless, all kills being rear. We had no AEW, 8,000 miles from home, with sea states that would defy belief. The Mirage did have the French built Magic 1, Matra R.530, with land based radar.
Too much is made of the so called 'all aspect' sidewinder. BTW Sharky Ward's book is a great read.
Very good read, I had the great pleasure of meeting Sharky after we both left the Navy.
I am English and yes war is stupid most of the time........Both sides lost loved ones......my condolences to the Argentine's who lost family members too......
I accept your condolences, please accept mine. let's understand that we are all human beings, God will ask us to account for all this. Big hug. Malvinas are Argentines, we can never give up. I regret the lives that were given, but the empires go by and the story takes another course always and this must be reason for analysis to avoid future problems. Greetings.
@@lobosperoThey lost any claim to the islands when there country invaded and killed British people. The UK only lost 200 or so people. Most of the people dying were your people. Attacking other Nations will only get you into trouble. The British was taken down after WW2 in case you didn't know. The price of victory in two world wars.
oh boo hoo, cry me a river
no, you grow up - the deaths of argentine soldiers and sailors and pilots lay at the hands of its own juanta government that took the islands by force - in fact launching a pre-invasion raid where they hurled explosives through the windows of the royal marine barracks in the middle of the night thinking the marines were sleeping peacefully in their beds - that kind of bullshit requires a response; honestly I think GB should have taken all the dead argentine bodies and sunk them on a ship in the atlanic and declared a "sea grave" instead of burying the bodies on the islands once argentina refused to accept those bodies and return them to their families
@Demo Just so you know, there have been many territory claims between Argentina and Chile for years, actually. Nevertheless, I think the comparison is not applicable for the islands' situation and status. There is a difference: Argentinian, Chilean and Uruguayan ancestors go back to the beginning of the Spanish colonization of America, while the british were settled in the islands after expelling the Argentinians in 1833. I agree it was a fight against piracy... the British are masters on that issue. if not... on what basis was the British Empire built?
Britain travelled thousands of miles to win this war just shows no matter what size your country is they can achieve great things with the right troops and equipment proud to be British
Well that's one thing the US failed to do
@@thed4974 and what exactly did the US fail to do?
I wouldn't be so sure about that. If you do your homework, they were very lucky on a number of counts and some serious errors were made. They would have still won, but lost a lot more troops and equipment doing so. One thing yoy can't argue with is the professionalism of the British Armed Forces, second to none.
But England was probably more populated than Argentina at this time??? So idk what size has to do with it lol
An aircraft with new technology can be bought, but not the bravery and honor of a few pilots willing to be respected and not give up, even in very inferior conditions.
¡Honor y Gloria a Nuestros Halcones!
Any pilot who goes balls to the wall and head first into a war zone is worthy of respect.
This is coming from a Brit.
Only two things to say: 1: war is a terrible thing; 2: Military (men and women) that fought in this war desearve all the respect.
@Anglus Patria *[laughs in soviet women]*
@@darkknightbatman8269 this war between England and Argentina not the Soviets
Robert Klein hahaha oof
Robert Klein I know the difference :(
Wars don't just happen, politicians start them and the military end them. Same nonsense across ages, for gold, for a lover, jealousy, wealth, treason, hubris and so on while the dog face cleans up their mess.
When I was an Infantry Marine at Camp LeJeune, we would occasionally get to see the Harriers do bombing practice close by. A UH-1 would drop smoke to mark the target and usually a flight of two Harriers would come in inverted to spot the smoke, then roll into the bombing run and drop their ordnance. Awesome planes!
0:17 correction Galtieri was a dictator and was never elected
Algo que nadie se da cuenta
Is really
he was still president though, that was his title
Era el presidente igual.
@@GeroG3N dictador no es sinónimo de presidente.
I think I said this on another video about the Falklands War, but my dad used to work with a Veteran of the Falklands War. From what I've heard, the fighting war brutal. My dad is also a combat veteran, although from a different war, and I know they find comfort in each other, having gone through the same or similar experiences. Even though I'm neither a soldier, a UK citizen, or Gods greatest child, I'd like to salute those who gave their all. If they're willing to tell you, listen to their stories, no matter what side they fought for.
The battle of Goose Green, took place on a near bowling green.
I knew a Para called "Tracey" who was their and was carrying the Radio Pack, when the shout came in the "H" was down. "no cover, no trenches, we jumped into every divot, and hoped our arses didn't stick out in the air too much".
Both my dad and his older brother did low altitude air support in the USAF, I love things like this
I worked in Argentina as a British worker shortly after the war ....all I will say is google the `Ocean guardian drilling platform `...it was all about oil...what i say that does in not in any way take away the bravery of the individual military personnel involved .....they were incredibly brave....and along the way saved many British nationals from a fate we know not ...all wars suck
Im am argentine and a survivor of enforced dissapearance and torture. The Argentinian State was an enemy of the British, but, also, an enemy of his own people. The argentinian fake-democracy its the rule of narcos and other south american political-mafias. i was kidnaped under the rule of Cristina Kirchner and Mauricio Macri. They came at night, without uniforms, without any kind of warrant, without legal-procedure witnesses, and with covered faces. The leader was a former chief of the police of Rosario (the argentinian Sinaloa). Now he is jailed, sentenced for narco and conspirancy. But I was dissapeared by years. Thousands were killed by this criminal organization. God bless this warrior piots, because they save the honest people of the Falklands. I really hope they never ever fell in the hands of this Terror-State, The narco-ruled-pseudo-democracy of Argentina.
Argentinian pilots were brave, but they foght for the bad guys. If argentina had won this war, many Falklands childrens will die of hunger, and 60% of the survivors will live his life in poverty or misery, under the rule of mafias.
Finaly someone who speak facts!
@@noodlefringe1802 so?, with that criteria, Ukraine is Russian territory, Midway islands Japan territory and Taiwan, Chinese. Stop coping, you are pirates and invaders. End of.
I remember from military aviation magazines at the time that they said the new sidewinders could hit when pointed within 15 degrees of the target - he just said he was 19 degrees off target and it still tracked. Goes to show that any quoted specifications are usually down-played.
The Fact none was shot down in AA combat is testimony to the skills of the pilots who flew them. The harrier literally was a sitting duck with many disadvantages. I think In this instance the Argentina’s got caught by surprise. The British pilot even said he spotted the Four planes visually, so neither knew by radar or had any previous warnings. The Argentinians were on a bombing run.
The many Royal Navy ships had radars and could tell the Harriers where to go, even tell them exactly what height and speed and direction the enemy was travelling.
The last part was visual detection, as cloud in the area would have prevented the enemy from attempting a bombing run, meaning no fight, no victory.
I have met the guy who was shot down over Falkland. He was a fighter pilot, now retired and lives in Switzerland. I was just the delivery guy that brought him new sofa and somehow I saw skin injuries, when I asked him what was it from , he told me he was a pilot over Falkland. That guy lived thru some bad shit. He was baddly injured.
You sir, are talking out of your arse.
Keep taking the tablets.
p.s. you should ask for some help with your spelling.
You have a great imagination, don't forget to take your tablets.
I thought Jedis don't lie.
Dud you get his name?
the guy youre referring to is Simon Weston.....but he wasnt a pilot and i doubt he lives in Switzerland. On the ship that was struck.(if there had been a pilot sustained those types of injuries i think we'd have known about it)
Two things: the British pilots were exponentially better trained than the Argentine pilots. Second, the Argentines got revenge by stoning the cars of a British TV show thirty years later, must have felt great to finally even the scales against three middle aged men driving those dangerous cars through that country...
See above Michael. . .many Argie military pilots were taught to fly in the UK. . . even from basic training at Kidlington airfield, in Oxfordshire.
They lost all there best pilots in the first few days you could see the change of tactics when attacking the ships at st Carlos 3 to 4 days after the landings
@Michael Alexander I'd throw anything I could get my hands on at them.... muppets.
haha! very witty and hey! Latinos???????? no contest! my case rests!
They sure showed the British who the boss was with those stones
Super proud of the royal navy pilots and their amazing skill and bravery...
Yeah , amazing, don't you dare compare to our pilots and by the way, thank our argentine-british pilots during WWII who fought alongside with yours in the 164 argentine-britsh squadron
@@RodrigoVillaverde-ro6yt You still want to attack our citizens, correct? Argentina still claims the Falklands. You will wait for our moment of weakness to conquer our lands and claim national victory.
A true hero, his service and others shall never be forgotten🇬🇧
The Sea Harrier. A gem.
I have seen Harriers in action at close quarters. Unforgetable.
Isn't the Harrier the jet that kid tried to buy with Pepsi points back in the 90s? I wish he had succeeded lol.
MakerInMotion what?
google it william...its hilarious.
Some one watches today I found out
He did get enough, but they wouldn't accept the Pepsi points.
MakerInMotion yup
Me when someone calls a british lieutenant a "lootenint":
Chokes on tea
Yeah it’s pronounced left-tennent
yes it was the British pronunciation of lieutenant
@@arabindadas4380 the British pronunciation is “leftenant”
Only reason it is pronounced "leftenent" is because if you pronounce it correctly it sounds too french or German and as brits we can't have any of that.
@@leemason5953 no, “leftenant” *is* the correct pronunciation
Speaks volumes about the Harrier capabilities, as well as the skills of the fine British pilots. Excellent job.
"just vapourized the aircraft"
Taking vaping to the next level!
the new e-cig
Well done gents, professional and humble as always.
Can’t beat British pilots
Once went to the British Grand Prix at Brands. By far the highlight of the day was a dis[play by a Harrier, hovering like an alien spaceship above the trees.
Thank you for your service
I was in the RAF when all this happened and we lost people that were never talked about too ...All very brave men and women
I've read a lot of the Royal Navy's (or Sharkey Ward to be precise) disdain over the RAF, in particular towards the Harrier GR3 crews and this model's capabilities. As much as I admire the Royal Navy and Ward for what they done, I found Ward's words towards the GR3 and its crews to be harsh, especially since Dave Morgan was actually RAF and that the Harrier GR3 and its crews were (from what I know of) more capable than the Harrier FRS1 in air-to-ground roles and whose pilots were incredibly experienced in that role.
Regardless of what was said, I still admire them and am incredibly proud.
What women combatants died in the falklands
There is a lot that has never been poublicised. I agree - brave men and women.
"and women" that´s rather insulting to the men who died.
@@hanoitripper1809 they weren't combatants, but a British missile killed three civilians in Malvinas, two were women...
There’s something about England that you just don’t want to fuck with.
Tiny island packing serious heat. ✌️
And also Malta and Japan
And also Malta and Japan
What about Scotland or northern Ireland even wales
You mean Scotland England Wales and Northern Ireland lol
John G he means the U.K. agree with his sentiment though
Us Brits have always been good at engineering especially our RAF 🇬🇧
Should've also had the TSR2.
you harrier pilots were amazing. We all knew that and appreciated yous thanks
The gurkhas were upset it ended so early
dpolww dw I remember watching a news clip showing the gurkas sharpening their Kukri, this then was broadcasted to the Argentinians just to demoralise them.
yeah the little fellas were gutted lol, don`t cry for me sergeant major has a few good gurkha stories
dpolww dw not upset, they were throughly pissed off!
As a Army Reservist, I saw some Gurkas from Singapore [I think] training at Puckapunyal Army Base, Victoria, Australia, late '80's early 90's, and one of the girls said "Help, we been invaded!", well she was a bit "dippy", strawberry blonde and all that, so we had to set her straight that they were Gurkas, best damn soldiers and bravest allies you could ever wish for. Pity those unfortunates who have to face Gurkas in battle.
Sorry but my uncle were in this war and he told me crying several times he killed one gurka, and he even still have that strange tradicional knife they used to carry.
Britain liberated the Argentine people from a junta that killed thousands of its people with the victory. On paper, Britain hadn't a chance of pulling this off, even US Naval experts said that. But, paper doesn't fly these aircraft, and looking at the names of the regiments en route to fight on land, being out numbered really meant little. I am not British, but what the British forces achieved is quite remarkable and I think many don't understand it.
Your correct, seems like they kept a bunch of tougher units keeping an eye on Chili. I think they never thought an invasion would happen and when the Royal Navy was close, it would have been risky sending transports over. I think the conscripts found the Islands to be a miserable posting., much different then they imagined.
rick081956 Like all armies Argentina has good well trained troops and rookies. In the Falklands they had both.
I do think most American's just did not know, especially 30 years ago, our govt could be involved in such things we would find offensive. We are not so trusting anymore. Argentina from what I have seen for years is held in high regard with most Americans.
Balls. They were proper ones there as well.
rick081956 "the british liberated the people from argentina" hahahhahshshaha thats a good one
The RAF have a lot of respect for the Argentine pilots, particularly those that flew in the Falklands. Aside from the harrier being a spectacular and revolutionary piece of British Engineering it was also incredibly difficult to fly and master-it holds the record for the most training fatalities. Therefore the British didn’t just send any RAF pilots, they sent the best. So, the Argentines weren’t only up against the harrier, but some of the most experienced RAF pilots; and the RAF in itself is revered and globally respected. They had balls the Argies, you’ve got to give them that.
Sorry but 80% of the pilots were Fleet air arm .
This ain't the RAF, Son. It's the Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm
@@rupertholborn9258 The air to air was mostly FAA, but the RAF did the air to ground. This engagement is the FAA
I have a question. F4 Phantoms were not able to take off from carriers? They could ve done a lot more difference in air combat and ground support
@@FJFerra The British had the the HMS Ark Royal, but it was retired before the war. This meant they couldn’t use the Phantoms in the conflict.
I remember the Falklands War I was in my teens back then growing up that was really the only conflict other than the Cold War when I was a kid. I remember building a plastic model of a Harrier jump jet.
This was dope. As a canadian its good to know those brits got my back if shit ever hits the fan
We're coming for your syrup you just wait. Rush can't stop us now
I'm kidding, we have your back too.
If the USA ever invades Canada again, we burn down the white house again like before.
TheSm1thers Goodluck getting on the lawn 😂
@@loes3000 We'll just send one of our agents currently residing in the states such as John Oliver, Wayne Rooney, or one of the many actors who you probably think are American because they use American accents in films, to sneak into the white house and burn it down or fly over it with incendiaries.
amazing footage,and an amazing plane, remember the task force going out from Portsmouth harbour,bunked off school to watch it😀
Can't say I'd be mad at a kid for doing that
Who did not. I think the schools had to close because nobody turned up :)
I was on top of Round Tower in Old Portsmouth.
I live in portsmouth aswell! Fancy that...
Lived, Past tense. Now living in Australia since 1990.
*British Grenadiers starts playing*
Argentina: "Why do I hear boss music?"
One of the top five fighter jets ever designed and produced ,an absolutely incredible aircraft capable of pulling off manoeuvres like no other, before or since ..
Yes, the Harrier, though a turbo jet, had twice the power of the Phantom. Its turbo jet being a plus with shear acceleration but also made it less streamlined to achieve supersonic speeds.
@@stephenmcdonagh2795 Twice the power? Phantom had 35,000 lbf, Harrier had 21,000lbf
Errr. It’s not supersonic.
@@stephenmcdonagh2795 Tell me you know nothing about the Harrier without telling me.
@@stephenmcdonagh2795What? The Harrier was a sub sonic fighter 😂
l can't avoid reading anything but hateful comments from both the Argentinian and the British. As a 17 year old Argentine first, and as a global citizen second, I can not help but wondering why so much hate towards people who fought an unfair war. We were ruled at the time by our most violent military regime ever, who thought would be a good propaganda to kick the british out of Falklands and win the favor of the people. However, for this task they sent only our professional air force, as our ground troops were just conscripted kids, most of which didn't even know what the Falklands were. This was necessary for the regime in order yo keep peace at home as there were a lot of these young people fighting in guerrilla and paramilitary forces; besides, our true proffesional army was left behind in Buenos Aires in order to protect the regime.
Besides, there is so much ignorance in this comment section I would urge everybody to go and get informed a bit before saying, for example, that britain was responsible for us freeing ourselfs from the military regime.
If you went through all of this, then thanks for reading and have a nice day :D
alberto crlin The point is that your country attacked us and killed our boys. So, we retaliated and booted you back off the island. Your country attacked ours, so of course we are a bit pissed. People died unnecessarily because of your countries actions, not mine.
Number one the Falklands are British! the dictator you had wanted only to divert discontent in Argentina (los desaparecidos ) so he tried to pitch Latinos against the British???????
Well said Alberto. Too much silliness going o here. Another case of the Lying Politicians getting loads of their people killed by lying to them. . .Just like the Gulf war. . .Lies. 'Iraq can deploy weapons of mass destruction in 45 minutes' Yeah, Right. So they took out Saddam. THAT TURNED OUT WELL DIDN'T IT ? Then the did it again with Libya.. . . Now we have a tsunami of Migrants coming thru Libya to flood Europe with their jihadism.. . . .Politicians ?. . . .! WHY NOT SHOOT ALL OF THEM maybe we'd have some peace for a while. . .?
alberto crlin. I agree,
Steve Sheppard "Our country"? It was a military regime at that time and a dictatorship; They killed your boys and they also killed our boys by starting this stupid an unnecessary war. But don't blame the whole country and it's people for something that obviously was out of their choice or control.
As a 23 years old argentinian, I don't hate British nor it's people, actually I visited it, everyone was kind and had a great time there. I invite you to do the opposite and visit Argentina, You'll be surprised.
The point, 35 years past the war, is that we need to stop hating each other.
Have a nice day.
The SeaHarrier also has the distintion of having the last ever (so far) gunkill of a fighter against another ..as one shot down an A-4 with its 30mm guns..
I remember seeing harriers for the first time at Farnborough airshow in the mid sixties, all the crowd was facing the runway a further away was a clum of trees, suddenly about four harriers came from behind the trees, iit was like something from war of the worlds, they did there routine then came down the runway at about 100 ft simultaneously turning towards the crowd bowing then flying off, amazing
You never forget your first real life Harrier.
1990, Portsmouth Harbour "Navy Day",
Sea Harrier, swoops in and goes into a hover.
All the air molecules in your lungs vibrate.
She bows, and gracefully pulls up and away.
It still remains as THE war for Argentina while for GB it barely represents two pages in their 20 volume records of historic conflicts.
i love this comment
Don't invade British territory if you don't want a conflict.
@@Deadeye1967 have you noticed how much territory your country has lost the past 100 years? I wouldn't play the "mighty" and "unbeatable" card anymore
@@agus_pax8796 What? If the Falklands said they want to be independent fair enough, but whilst under British sovereignty anyone attacks it they are essentially attacking GB. Nothing to do with mighty and unbeatble card. We didn't lose anything mate, we gave countries indepence who wanted it, most of them have gone downhill since leaving but that is another story.
Wanting independence is very different to being attacked by a random country who decides that they want to take British sovereignty. Think about it.
they invaded many territories by force and call themselves heroes... double standards ..
What a legacy... After HMS Hermes was inducted into the Indian Navy as INS Viraat and we had this aircraft carrier and the Sea Harriers in-service for a long time !
Not a bad service for something built in WW2
@@mrcaboosevg6089 I’m impressed as well. British built ships are known to stay in service for a long time though.
And you couldn't fly them cos your pilots were so poorly trained. You can't fighter pilot if you learned on a Penny Farting!
@Roger Brain, and your evidence and experience comes from where?
Many thanks to all you pilots and service men on the ships.
Awesome vid! ... I have his book about flying the Sea Harrier. HMS Invincible visited NZ I have a mate who was Tactical Radar Operator on HMS Invincible during the Falklands War he didn't know if he was going to live or die!.. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
Love from the USA ❤️
Joe Smith
Hello from across the pond :)
The pilots on both sides demonstrated skill and courage.
The Argentine Air Force was the only professional branch. The Army and Navy was in a bad shape since they specialized in taking the local government by force instead of training to fight foreign forces LOL
@@jackdanila9893 Eso es mentira informate mejor.
@@arielgoldfarb4118 no Es mentira, no teníamos casi soldados profesionales la mayoría eran conscriptos, y no teníamos casi navíos de guerra equipados con misiles y torpedos, los aviones no tenían casi misiles guiados por infrarrojo solo teníamos un par de exocet , teníamos bombas activadas por temporizador que al volar bajo no explotaban, los asientos eyectables estaban vencidos si le tiraban el avión más que seguro el piloto moría, y así. Solamente teníamos pilotos buenos, sin desmerecer a todos los otros que lucharon que también son héroes, sería mentira llamar profesional a las otras fuerzas
Juan Pablo Melita bim-5 y Rim 25 eran completamente profesionale, dicho por los mismos ingleses
@@jackdanila9893Mentira en tierra el armamento era casi el mismo. Los ingleses si tenían visores nocturnos para apuntar y nosotros solo para ver. El resto del armamento era el mismo. Respecto a las fuerzas aeronavales si había diferencia y los aviones eran viejos pero así y todo los ingleses tuvieron las mayores pérdidas materiales y humanas desde la segunda guerra mundial algo que nunca jamás los políticos y los civiles ingleses chauvinistas admitirán solo los veteranos británicos que si saben lo que fue lo dicen. En 2 meses tuvieron las mismas pérdidas que en todas las guerras coloniales anteriores desde 1945 de años de duración. Respecto al mito de los "chicos" de Malvinas que se meaban de miedo y se la pasaban llorando TODO MENTIRA lo mismo sobre la falta de profesionalidad de los oficiales y sino habla con veteranos de Malvinas. Los ingleses casi pierden la guerra y eso es todo. Con todos sus recursos y superioridad y ayuda casi la terminan perdiendo sino la guerra al menos la batalla de Malvinas. Basta de ensalzar a potencias extranjeras. Los ingleses han perdido cientos de batallas en su historia pero son inteligentes y muy buenos en marketing y se saben vender igual que los yanquis. En cambio nuestra cultura de mierda del lamento y de tirarse abajo y pobres de nosotros y los 500 años y bla bla bla me tiene los huevos llenos el eterno lamento hispanoamericano.
Argentine air force were using old mirage jets that were no match for harrier. They know that when they go for fight, they probably are not coming back but they still put up fight. Great respect for Argentine air force.
The mirage was actually classed as better than the harriers, its just the argentinian pilots didnt know how to fight harriers, whereas the harriers did know how to fight mirages
Mirages or super etendards?
Amazing love the footage
I'm pretty sur I owe my life to a FAA pilot. A4 saw me and a couple of guys in the open and turned towards us. At that moment the Argentine pilot and us saw a Harrier about a mile out. The Argentine aircraft aborted his intended mission and fucked off with a Harrier on his tail. (They both disappeared behind mountains so I don't know the outcome). Many thanks FAA.
Corky341 it's not about the killing it's about doing what is right. Congratulations for making it out alive. Let's honor the fallen
Top bloke massive respect fella
Glad you're here to tell the story mate! Respect.
What you been smokin' Allah? You f@cking MUST have been stoned making that STUPID comment. (Just a (very) simple child who knows NOTHING). Haha. What a mug. :-(
the last time Britain was great
When i saw the Argentine jets explode i had a feeling i have almost never felt before. It was sadness because this is the first time i have seen an actual person die and thinking about it doesnt get you this feeling. It takes until you actually see it. Just another thing tl show that war is bad unless it is completely necessary. Respect to both countries. I love Argentina and i feel bad for the pilots. The way how they flew showed that they probably had no idea thst a missle was coming. Early warning systems were either not invented or it wasnt as good as today. Argentina! And Uk! 🇬🇧
They knew those missiles were coming,their headset would have been going crazy telling them a missile was locked on and incoming,just nothing they could do about it.
@@leemason5953 I see
Im am argentine and a survivor of enforced dissapearance and torture. The Argentinian State was an enemy of the British, but, also, an enemy of his own people. The argentinian fake-democracy its the rule of narcos and other south american political-mafias. i was kidnaped under the rule of Cristina Kirchner and Mauricio Macri. They came at night, without uniforms, without any kind of warrant, without legal-procedure witnesses, and with covered faces. The leader was a former chief of the police of Rosario (the argentinian Sinaloa). Now he is jailed, sentenced for narco and conspirancy. But I was dissapeared by years. Thousands were killed by this criminal organization. God bless this warrior piots, because they save the honest people of the Falklands. I really hope they never ever fell in the hands of this Terror-State, The narco-ruled-pseudo-democracy of Argentina.
Argentinian pilots were brave, but they foght for the bad guys. If argentina had won this war, many Falklands childrens will die of hunger, and 60% of the survivors will live his life in poverty or misery, under the rule of mafias.
@@leemason5953wrong, sidewinder is heat seeking and argeninians did not have radar warning receivers either. May be the pilot did see it, may be not. Argentinians reached the fleet with the minimum fuel just to drop bombs and get back. They had no fuel for dog fighting, just for some evasive maneuvers while coming back and barely reach the base again. They went anyway to the limit and attacked impossible missions, against all odds, and that is why they even surprised the Royal Navy.
@@smaraggi that is correct. Argentina used ad-hoc modified brit bombs originally designed to destroy ground targets. Only 5 exocets and a lot of courage. Impossible to win with an international embargo.
Shows what difference a highly trained pilot can make
Fortunately this wouldnt happen again with Britains modern war fighting capabilities.
Back then in the 80’s, NATO forces where dedicated to fighting off a Soviet invasion. Therefore Britain was tasked with defending the Greenland-Uk gap, preventing Soviet subs from access to the high seas.
Our carriers werent really carriers, their designation was ‘through deck cruisers’ and were designed to hunt Soviet submarines. Also, the Exocet anti ship missile was recently invented and no navy in the world knew just how devastating they would be and Royal Navy ships were built very light and lightly defended against air attacks. We were lucky we still had HMS Hermes, our last true carrier and if the Argentines would have waited a year then we wouldn’t have had the Hernes as it was due to be sold to India where it served as the INS Viraat in later years.
This war was a very important war for the Western NATO forces and many lessons where learned.
Royal Navy personnel were given flame retardant uniforms as the ones in the falklands melted to sailors skins in a fire.
The real threat of anti ship missiles became apparent which had led to the Royal Navy building the Type 45, simply the most formidable anti air destroyer ever made.
The threat of modern submarines was rammed homed with the fact that HMS Conquerer kept the entire Argentine fleet out of the war has led us to build the Astute class Nuclear Attack Sub.
And of course the war showed us how, as an island nation, we rely on a strong Navy with capable aircraft carriers.
If Argentina tried now to attack the Falklands, well, it just wouldnt happen. The HMS Queen Elizabeth Carrier Battle Group has around 4 times the combat power as the entire task force had back in 1982.
I love the British. They are the best. I can only thank you guys for everything you do to help us Americans in every conflict we have ever had. I have the up most respect for you. Thank you.
Thank you, the respect is mutual. We will always have your back & front if need be!
Honesty and integrity We stand by each other's side, we are brothers in arms.
Honesty and integrity it's all right mate it's a pleasure fighting with you
John Stots
Oh stop it!
John Stots
You know the history of both the islands & the invasion right? Galtieri had his arse on the fire in Argentina & needed a distraction to take the Argentinian people's minds off of the political and economic situation *THAT* is why he launched the invasion!
Britain or is bankers had no desire for that to happen or hand in making it happen. You are making a fool of yourself.
Great plane, great pilots and humble as always.
I remember watching the Harriers on the news in 82 when I was 8 & pestering my mum to get me the Airfix model 😂 it’s still a cool plane.
I remember fondly playing a 'harrier attack' game on my ZX Spectrum 48K back in the 1980s.
Harrier is one of the best fighter it's ever been made for its time and still been used and looks good and Falkland war with legendary Vulcan and specially aerial re feuding it's something extraordinarily
The last Skyhawk seeing all his gang shot down be like:
"NNNNOPE!"
Commander Sharkey Ward of 801 squadron wrote a book detailing his wartime experiance from onboard HMS Invicible, great read. Sea Harrier Over the Falklands
Absolutely beautiful aircraft, that and the spectacular Avro Vulcan bomber. Loved her howl and the wall of sound.
Why was it so effective?...hard to understand the Mirage was just a game bird
Did the Argentinian Air Force have Tankers?
I heard the Vulcan too few ejection seats?
So Argentina declares war on Great Britain and expected them NOT to be mad
so uk took malvinas and expected argentina not to be mad
@@ditso8404 , So Argentina took south America and you expect the indigenous tribes not to be mad .
@@garwhittaker3743 South America was taken by Spain, then the Viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata was created and then the countries began to form, you should read a little history before commenting
Who cares about a fking island as brithain is? Lol we are a BIG country compared to that infected muslim island...
A bit of context: They declared a war to distract people from the economic crisis of that time, not to actually take the islands
The sea harrier could outrun the F4 Skyhawk and it could outclimb both the F4 Skyhawk and Mirage III. The harrier also had the ability to make impossible turns and rapidly decelerate mid-air due to its vectoring thrust nozzles. That and it's bigger than 1 thrust to weight ratio made it a formidable dogfighter. It might not have had all the advantages, but it had a lot of advantages.
Florian Bösch add to that the aim sidewinder which were top of the spear when talking of fire and forget at that time. Also argentinan planes didn't even had warning system when they were being locked by any kind of missiles.
+Florian Bosch True, you make a number of excellent points. But the British kill rate of 21 to 0 is still very impressive, no? Ha. Even the Polish Air Force in 1939 shot down some German fighters, by comparison.
Hold on that thought: Only one Mirage was shot down during the entire war. The 20+ other aircraft destroyed are american-made light bombers which were absolutely not made for air combat.
+TwoFistsOneHalleluja If that's true, that's a reasonable point, but the Air to Air kill ratio still demonstrates that the Argentinian pilots (including those in the Mirage fighters) were either unwilling or unable to effectively engage the British fighters, because the British fighter losses were ZERO. You call the A4 Skyhawk "light bombers absolutely not made for air combat" but that's not exactly true, the A4 was a highly maneuverable fighter which served as a Mig-17 replacement in the US "Top Gun" fighter training school. Of course, everything the A4 did well, the Harrier did better, but the A4 was still capable of air to air dogfighting (unlike pure bombers like the A6 or A7), and better pilots in A4's would have done better than the Argentinians did!
"If that's true"
It is.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentine_air_forces_in_the_Falklands_War#Units
You'll see Argentina lost two mirages III. If you pursue your navigation to the Mirage III page, you'll see one of these two was destroyed by friendly fire while landing and only one was actually destroyed in a dogfight.
The Mirage III is an interceptor designed around the idea that it would one day have to shoot down soviet bombers over Europe. The brits knew that very well and were smart enough to remain far out on the ocean, just outside of the Mirage's reach, for most of the war. They lost two large ships, some 40+ men and 6 choppers to two Super Etendards with Exocet missiles tho.
So it's kind of missleading that this video would first mention the Mirages (who were mostly used for intimidation), instead of the Skyhawks (who were the ones getting shot down) or the Super Etendards (who were the ones killing brits). Sounds a bit like the authors want us to believe that the harriers downed 21 Mirages.
I watched a spanish air force Harrier at farnborough 2 years ago. It absolutely stole the show - put the eurofighter in the shade - the pilot hovered about 20M above ground for 2 minutes - incredible power and control.
Sea Harriers did the business in the air and HMS Conqueror kept their fleet in harbour. Well done Royal Navy, without you it would have been an impossible war.
harriers were the best warplanes at the time . amazing machines and they look sexy but when it comes to pilots argentine were and still the best . and i didnt said that . ww2 fighter Pierre Clostermann ACE Combat
@@kikeamatore
Pierre Clostermann was not at the Falklands so how would he know?
@@0riginalFIR3
The AIM 9L was no advantage since it was new and untried, almost all the kills were from directly behind and some of them using the Cannon not missiles
@@jaxric8518
All air to air casualties were by the Sea Harrier, the AIM 9 L was untried and not reliable so the kills were all by getting behind, not using the supposed all aspect ability of the AIM 9 L.
I guess we should be very thankful for all the help like Britain having to lay down the law so they could use their own territory the Ascension Islands.
As usual the Yanks want to take all the credit.
@@0riginalFIR3 a murican missile given to Britain for their advantage.
When I was young and uneducated, I loved the victory in the Falklands over, what I saw as the “evil” of Argentina. Then I grew up and realised that there can rarely be a true victory in war. Argentina is a sleeping powerhouse. Maybe not in a military sense, but definitely as a economical power. Britain has a strained relationship with Argentina but in distant history, we were very close. Britain took the railways to Argentina and their beef trade stems from the Scottish Angus breed of cattle. A working partnership between our nations would, I think, be very beneficial to us both.
nice analisis. the decline of argentina to an extent is also explained by the rise of the usa of an hegemonic power and the retraction of the uk, all this after ww1.
Argentina has roughly the same population as Spain yet their economy is way worse
I was a 15 year old school kid and used to get home whack the news on, I found it so exciting, didn't understand the horrors of war back then.
4:03 the photographer actually asked him to step back into his cockpit after getting out for this famous clip
USA: Maybe you can give Argentina back the Falklands?
UK: No
USA: Ok. Here have some weapons
Your ignorance is astonishing
Nice
@TED D it’s a oversimplified reference
Give them back? They’re where never theirs in the first place.
@Jakey Snakey please enlighten me...
What a machine the Harrier was.
cant you see the missiles did all the job...?
Stories like this fill me with pride
A tense air battle, to distinguish it from the air battles that are not tense.
I want you english people to know, Argentina was under a dictatorship these days, so none of the ones who started that war were real president, they just took the control by force.
English?? - it was the British armed forces and an island where the Islanders want to be British - not sure why you single the English out - 3 other nations make up the British armed forces mate.
collen26 That is splitting hairs for someone in south america perhaps
first thing I've read that makes sense in a long time.
That's absolutely right. The Argentines are a lovely, warm, civilised people and Argentina is a fabulous country to visit. They have been badly let down by their so-called rulers, as we have in the UK (perhaps to a lesser extent, who knows).
Agreed! You are so right.
Good shot old man. You should try the F-35JSF. YOU'D LOVE IT.
Thank you for your service, every day is poppy day
Hello chaps! Just a small point for clarification: Lefftenant Commahnder is the correct pronunciation. I think you’ll find Loo tenants are people who occupy public conveniences.
Toodle pip.
All due to the excellent Rolls Royce "flying beadsted" :)
The sea harrier was a legendary aircraft.
Respect from India.
I remember listening to one of the Harrier pilots being interviewed back then and him describing there viffing (Not sure if that is the correct spelling) manoeuvre where they would reverse the flow of the jets and almost stop the aircraft in the air during a dogfight, the consequences were that the chasing aircraft would shoot past and the pilot would then launch his missiles at the aircraft after it had shot past, a killer manoeuvre. The other pilot had absolutely no counter move for this tactic.
Watching the news in 1982 and seeing a Harrier drop straight on to the carrier......whoa, they can do that now?! Blew my freaking mind!
Wow, to have lived through that, as those pilots.
pawelpap9 I thought none of the pilots were killed
hoyah hayoh life expectancy of a jet pilot is very low in any conflict.
Yea I think is probably the last real air to air battle. This kind of warfare just doesn't happen any more.
BlatentlyFakeName ummm desert storm had some pretty good air to air combat
should have brought a dalton lib with the safe fall implant equipped
When General Mario Menendez surrendered his forces, he went against established Argentine military doctrine. Surrender is only an option
when casualties reach 50 percent and when expended ammunition reaches 75 percent. Prior to the surrender, General Galtieri in Buenos Aires had a
heated telephone exchange with Menendez, demanding the latter fight to the last man. By that time, Argentine military discipline and morale had already
broken down. British forces captured over four million rounds of 7.62MM and 11,000 105MM rounds, 14 flyable helicopters among other hardware.