New threat to the US? China's navy in overdrive. (Newsflash)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 тра 2024
  • This short news video comments on the very recent show of force by the Chinese navy, when it put into service three big naval vessels, all at the same ceremony, in a single day. A 09-IV submarine, a 055 destroyer and a 075 LHD ship were all commissioned. The video goes a bit into detail on each of the three, and puts the event into a broader context.
    Images used in the thumbnail:
    Chinese ship screencaps from CCTV footage.
    Music by Matija Malatestinic www.malatestinic.com
    Go to / binkov if you want to help support our channel. And enjoy the perks such as get access to our videos with no ads and get early access to various content.
    Suggest country pairs you'd like to see in future videos over at our website: www.binkov.com
    You can also browse for other Binkov T-Shirts or Binkov merch, via the store at our website, binkov.com/
    Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / binkovsbattlegrounds
    Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattlegrounds
    Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,4 тис.

  • @puttankinamall9693
    @puttankinamall9693 3 роки тому +1171

    what a great time to be 15-20yrs old healthy fit male

    • @Putput-se5ew
      @Putput-se5ew 3 роки тому +127

      Yeah I’m trying to imagine the insane benefits like trips to the other side of the world and so on... or maybe they just come to us instead so we will do the fighting here

    • @THX-1138
      @THX-1138 3 роки тому +15

      aaaaaaaaaaaahahahhaaaaaaaa

    • @cucuawe465
      @cucuawe465 3 роки тому +76

      What a great time to be south east asia young citizens

    • @nat0106951
      @nat0106951 3 роки тому +61

      so 30 year olds are exempted? 😁 ok. go fight younglings 🙂

    • @kyle1751
      @kyle1751 3 роки тому +5

      @@Putput-se5ew highly unlikely

  • @pseudonym9599
    @pseudonym9599 3 роки тому +898

    To think I should live to see the end of one cold war and the beginning of another...

    • @truejoshi8569
      @truejoshi8569 3 роки тому +41

      Feels bad man..

    • @panzermkii7675
      @panzermkii7675 3 роки тому +46

      war...war never changes

    • @ethanliu3048
      @ethanliu3048 3 роки тому +99

      The fact is China never want to start a war with anybody.
      Trump is the guy who yelling "ChinaChinaChina" for several years.

    • @AnonymousSong
      @AnonymousSong 3 роки тому +25

      In facts, it's a beginning of 2 new ones. the U.S is still treating the world in 80s.

    • @99hockeynhl
      @99hockeynhl 3 роки тому +153

      @@ethanliu3048 The Chinese regime is an expansionist-authoritarian government. They took the Paracel islands from Vietnam, they claim all of the south china sea with their bogus "9 dash line" boundary, and finally they are still engaged with the genocide of Uighur muslims living in china. Trump has just been the only president with the balls to stand up to China.

  • @kaylee9069
    @kaylee9069 3 роки тому +358

    Old saying : "If you want peace, prepare for war".

    • @cloudysoup9056
      @cloudysoup9056 3 роки тому +6

      I mean who want a war anyways?

    • @helvetius1572
      @helvetius1572 3 роки тому +94

      @@cloudysoup9056 AMERICA

    • @twandepan
      @twandepan 3 роки тому +7

      “Si vis pacem, para bellum”

    • @jamesycj1
      @jamesycj1 3 роки тому +16

      @@helvetius1572 100%

    • @kagakai7729
      @kagakai7729 3 роки тому +8

      @@cloudysoup9056 Lockheed Martin investors YEEEE BOIIII

  • @thundermouth2504
    @thundermouth2504 3 роки тому +396

    That Type-055 Large Destroyer/Cruiser is a beauty!

    • @tclem14
      @tclem14 3 роки тому +10

      Unproven, i want to see it sink something

    • @lancer3514
      @lancer3514 3 роки тому +18

      You are a communist. Fuck you. I would like to see that sunk. America is no.1 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

    • @Xaviorplus
      @Xaviorplus 3 роки тому +57

      no india no.1

    • @lancer3514
      @lancer3514 3 роки тому +4

      @@Xaviorplus Your opinion not mine.

    • @thundermouth2504
      @thundermouth2504 3 роки тому +25

      @@tclem14 Whatever helps you sleep at night

  • @troutwarrior6735
    @troutwarrior6735 3 роки тому +1275

    A storm is brewing, and I can't be the only one who's feeling it. . .
    Probably felt like this in 1914

    • @kouvue1081
      @kouvue1081 3 роки тому +26

      Been brewing

    • @TheGirard62
      @TheGirard62 3 роки тому +28

      Once again, we shall prevail

    • @jeanclaudiogutierrezmarin4523
      @jeanclaudiogutierrezmarin4523 3 роки тому +102

      actually a few years before WWII, President Roosevelt saw the increasing naval build up of Japan as a threat and took critical decitions who gave the US enough margin to deal with the IJN during the course of the war. Naval Warfare is often won and lost in the decade before the war itself.

    • @jessievanderstam3096
      @jessievanderstam3096 3 роки тому +17

      China vs America confirmed both will lose

    • @formworksucks
      @formworksucks 3 роки тому +38

      It feels like 1938 to me.

  • @thebigone6071
    @thebigone6071 3 роки тому +1390

    You’re the greatest military analyst sock puppet frog in world history Binkov!!!

    • @thing.1263
      @thing.1263 3 роки тому +90

      Difficult to find another analyst sock puppet frog too

    • @royalpotato1908
      @royalpotato1908 3 роки тому +3

      @@thing.1263 lmao

    • @AhhLewis
      @AhhLewis 3 роки тому +3

      @@thing.1263 hahaha

    • @AhhLewis
      @AhhLewis 3 роки тому +18

      @wUm Ao he hasnt done any "war begins now "videos

    • @sr-71667
      @sr-71667 3 роки тому +1

      You sound jealous

  • @jessematthews6861
    @jessematthews6861 3 роки тому +119

    And remember, Binkov may talk about hypothetical wars, but only real peace can bring us all together.

    • @ceberskie119
      @ceberskie119 3 роки тому +2

      Truer words were never spoken

    • @stc2828
      @stc2828 3 роки тому +10

      @@doomsday5286 Its says nothing about starting a war. Nobody would start a war for a virus.

    • @ximrade4287
      @ximrade4287 3 роки тому +13

      @@doomsday5286 Americans want to open new military bases on Chinese soil but China is resisting their imperialism

    • @haroldinho9930
      @haroldinho9930 3 роки тому +1

      @@ximrade4287 ok hired agent

    • @ximrade4287
      @ximrade4287 3 роки тому +9

      @@haroldinho9930 Im agent because i dont aggre with ur world views? Libs want freedom for all people but when the people have different opinion libs are fast to mute their voice

  • @MirageShen
    @MirageShen 3 роки тому +131

    Waiting for the 3rd aircraft carrier analysis video.

    • @user-um4kj7lo6y
      @user-um4kj7lo6y 3 роки тому +19

      Estimated from satellite images. It's about the same size as the Ford. It is expected to reach 100,000 tons. So far, no channels for boiler smoke have been found. It is speculated that it may be nuclear power. If the guess is correct. That will be the Chinese version of the Ford aircraft carrier. The KJ-600 fixed-wing early warning opportunity replaces the helicopter early warning aircraft. The GJ-11 stealth drone will also be deployed. But there is still a lack of carrier-based stealth fighters and carrier-based transport aircraft. So even if the aircraft carrier platform meets Ford's standards. There is still a gap in carrier-based aircraft!

    • @martinrivera4175
      @martinrivera4175 3 роки тому

      @@user-um4kj7lo6y what's the coordinates. 120 06° 06 E mine is 30 04° ? Mine is always 3-8 degrees off .

    • @martinrivera4175
      @martinrivera4175 3 роки тому

      Mistake. Im way off. 30 03 °°? N

    • @user-um4kj7lo6y
      @user-um4kj7lo6y 3 роки тому

      @linkzable The gap between carrier-based aircraft is very large. CN has only the fourth generation. And the United States has the fifth generation

    • @ceberskie119
      @ceberskie119 3 роки тому +2

      @@user-um4kj7lo6y it'd be amazing if they could pull that off with no actual experience building real carriers outside of the hot mess that is a Kuznetsov but the gap in fighter capability is severely underestimated. I personally tried digging through any and all videos of carrier based J-15 launches I could find... they've never videoed a J-15 taking off with a proper weapons payload. And the amount of fuel it takes to get off the deck of a carrier in a ground based air superiority fight must be staggering. Chinese carrier Aviation is not a threat to anyone until they develope a proper carrier fighter or redesign the J-15 with a catapult hook and design a maintainable catapult.

  • @pedrosanchez2943
    @pedrosanchez2943 3 роки тому +437

    So that's where the Australian iron ore is going....

    • @winstonteo9207
      @winstonteo9207 3 роки тому +67

      .....the Australian iron ore went.....

    • @matthewsecrest9818
      @matthewsecrest9818 3 роки тому +32

      Not anymore why ya think they are so crusty at Australia? Next thing they're gonna say is Australia used to be part of china, come on man everybody knows it!

    • @grandsicko8580
      @grandsicko8580 3 роки тому +10

      Australia could cripple china, by cutting of ore.

    • @w0mblemania
      @w0mblemania 3 роки тому +53

      @@grandsicko8580 Which would cripple Australia.
      In any case, China would simply buy that ore indirectly, straight from the market.

    • @ifardedandshidded5519
      @ifardedandshidded5519 3 роки тому +18

      @@matthewsecrest9818 Australia been part of China since ancient times!

  • @dogogamer212
    @dogogamer212 3 роки тому +549

    Fun fact: a considerable amount of people are mad about this.

    • @bussolini6307
      @bussolini6307 3 роки тому +142

      Jealousy is a hell of a drug

    • @cooperfrench4171
      @cooperfrench4171 3 роки тому +139

      Yeah, because China clearly intends to use these ships to conquer territory that is not rightfully theirs and kill innocent people in the process. Gee why would anyone be mad about that.

    • @rolandlibra6853
      @rolandlibra6853 3 роки тому +345

      @@cooperfrench4171 Isn't it exactly what the USA has been doing during the past 75 years or so ?

    • @Chris-df1zr
      @Chris-df1zr 3 роки тому +48

      @@cooperfrench4171 well if other countries can’t compete or defend themselves do they even really have a right to complain?

    • @johnmurphy5689
      @johnmurphy5689 3 роки тому +36

      @@cooperfrench4171 Well Taiwan does claim all of Mongolia so...
      But the South China Sea is a real problem, the only ally American has is *rising Sea Levels from Climate Change*
      Maybe Trump was correct in abandoning the Paris Climate Change agreement...
      But Florida would be lost though.

  • @karlvan6405
    @karlvan6405 2 роки тому +41

    Under the pretext of freedom of navigation, the United States sends warships to investigate and navigate in China's surrounding waters every day, which forces China to intensify its naval development in recent years. I don't think it's wise for the United States to do this.

    • @JohnBaker-jj5tx
      @JohnBaker-jj5tx 2 роки тому +2

      So when did 'freedom of navigation' stop being free?
      Ah, yes, cos the Chinese said so. Therein lies the problem. China is the bully.

    • @karlvan6405
      @karlvan6405 2 роки тому +35

      @@JohnBaker-jj5tx Is China a bully? If so, the South China Sea issue will not be a problem. China has not sent warships to the Caribbean, colonized other countries, dropped bombs on other countries, bombed embassies of other countries, hanged leaders and assassinated military generals of other countries, monitored its allies, and slaughtered more than 95% of the Native Americans. Based on the above facts and reasons, I think the title of bully can be returned to the United States intact. How can a country full of evils uphold justice under the banner of "freedom of navigation". Ah, it sounds a bit like the words of a hypocritical American politician. That's the problem.

    • @gamers-xh3uc
      @gamers-xh3uc 2 роки тому +2

      @@JohnBaker-jj5tx have china nuked or attack any country on its history no they haven't they have only attack them selves and defended against the japanese

    • @jtnelson8828
      @jtnelson8828 2 роки тому +2

      @@gamers-xh3uc your forgetting the part we're they commit genocide against millions of Muslims living in there boarders and excecute more of there citizens than any country in the world , China is in fact a bully

    • @jtnelson8828
      @jtnelson8828 2 роки тому +1

      @@karlvan6405 China murders millions of there Muslim citizens purely for the heck of it , and wish to invade there foreign neighbors , That the US by the way stands by to protect there freedoms. China is the bully

  • @veradrummond9002
    @veradrummond9002 3 роки тому +130

    Wow they look beautiful. No I'm not a bot lol just genuinely respect design and engineering.

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims 3 роки тому +30

      Don’t gotta be a bot to say they look good, the Zumwalts are ugly as sin

    • @lizexi7115
      @lizexi7115 3 роки тому +15

      @@looinrims i like the style on zumwalts, looks *edgy*
      i am getting the fuck out now

    • @swordofhan
      @swordofhan 2 роки тому +26

      Based on perspectives of Western mainstream media, anyone who dares to tell the truth can be listed as a bot

    • @makeitso9833
      @makeitso9833 2 роки тому +3

      They'll look even better on the bottom of the ocean.

    • @zeflute4586
      @zeflute4586 2 роки тому

      @@lizexi7115 I gave u a like for the "fuck out" part🤣
      But yeah, Zumwalts is cool in some way.

  • @ondrejbublavy7952
    @ondrejbublavy7952 3 роки тому +471

    Love your videos about China. It is very hard to find unbiased info on it's military. Thank you!

    • @missk1697
      @missk1697 3 роки тому +25

      >unbiased

    • @charles8769
      @charles8769 3 роки тому +140

      According to Americans all Chinese ships are made of paper and have a shelf life of 20 minutes

    • @HereForTheComments
      @HereForTheComments 3 роки тому +7

      Easy to be impartial when you live in a Cold War era bunker in scenic Nowhereslavia.

    • @thing.1263
      @thing.1263 3 роки тому +7

      Charles according to them again it seems Philippines navy is stronger ..... yes already saw that .

    • @michaellou7101
      @michaellou7101 3 роки тому +34

      @Timur Sayfullah look how long the you tu moon rover is functioning on the far side of the moon......it’s still running like the Duracell bunny. That’s the quality when the Chinese get serious.

  • @acardenasjr1340
    @acardenasjr1340 3 роки тому +533

    This is expected, the Chinese Navy are striving for a Blue Water Navy and are ramping up all kinds of construction.
    This was basically a message, "Take notice US, we're parallel building different units, in bulk, on the same completion schedule."

    • @Indigo947
      @Indigo947 3 роки тому +85

      China would not want to be invaded and occupied. That's all.

    • @jonathanchen5902
      @jonathanchen5902 3 роки тому +52

      @@Indigo947 as a Chinese American I would not like war between the two

    • @Phoenix_1776
      @Phoenix_1776 3 роки тому +7

      Oh yea well we have a laser weapon

    • @noneshere
      @noneshere 3 роки тому +2

      Government is only good as its next paycheck

    • @johnaustin9051
      @johnaustin9051 3 роки тому +15

      This will work like the artificial islands.....not long, not good.

  • @ceberskie119
    @ceberskie119 3 роки тому +7

    I love your videos youre thorough concise and informative on alot of really hard targets. Though you have one of the most intense comments sections I've ever seen. Haha

  • @eddiewong9272
    @eddiewong9272 3 роки тому +3

    Informative video.

  • @jayman7752
    @jayman7752 3 роки тому +119

    This definately doesn’t feel like everyone is gearing up for war

    • @Ry_TSG
      @Ry_TSG 3 роки тому +14

      Not one bit. Especially with all the secret treaties and alliances brewing in the pacific

    • @jayman7752
      @jayman7752 3 роки тому +17

      @@Ry_TSG the U.K. (where I am) has announced its cutting its army and hugely investing in the navy. Why? German militarism? The French..... I wonder

    • @Ry_TSG
      @Ry_TSG 3 роки тому +4

      @@jayman7752 Yeah, I heard about the new type 26 and shipbuilding efforts. really cools stuff that im sure is not for any reason in particular.

    • @bjorn7427
      @bjorn7427 3 роки тому +1

      @@jayman7752 they are just waiting to end this pandemic.

    • @alexandrepezzotti9344
      @alexandrepezzotti9344 3 роки тому +7

      @@jayman7752 we French are going from 8 main surface vessels in 2015 to 17 in 2030
      We launched construction of a 70000t nuclear carrier
      New upgrade on rafale
      New troop transports
      New heavy recon vehicles
      New version of the Leclerc mbt
      New main helicopter
      we have our largest budget since 1993
      (And modernizing all nuclear capable assets new planes and subs )
      And with corona we nationalized our main defense , nuclear and medical industry for more efficient delivery of materials and maintenance
      So yeah gearing up in case something goes wrong here to

  • @shinlin7615
    @shinlin7615 3 роки тому +206

    there was another destroyer 052D that was commissioned on the same date as well but did not make the show

    • @matthewsecrest9818
      @matthewsecrest9818 3 роки тому +10

      probably broke apart when it was launched

    • @johnyricco1220
      @johnyricco1220 3 роки тому +97

      @@matthewsecrest9818 Know the difference between launched and commissioned

    • @holyboxer2.072
      @holyboxer2.072 3 роки тому +130

      @@matthewsecrest9818 seems like your brain has broke apart

    • @kyle1751
      @kyle1751 3 роки тому +31

      @@matthewsecrest9818 it's not wise to underestimate your opponent

    • @DaGoook
      @DaGoook 3 роки тому

      Very very capable shit and beautiful to boot

  • @telfordlee4896
    @telfordlee4896 3 роки тому +58

    Hey, if someone keep messing around my front door intimidating me, don't u think I should get some more weapons?

    • @RobertStrafford
      @RobertStrafford 3 роки тому +6

      Not necessarily. No. I bet Hong Kong wished they had more when China took con trol of them . 1 if you're talking about the situation with Taiwan yes they should certainly get more weapons oh that's right we're getting them to them to protect their freedom.

    • @judsonchueng6506
      @judsonchueng6506 3 роки тому +27

      @@RobertStrafford
      Defintely necessarily. see, I bet Native Indian wished they had more when white took con trol of them . And if you're talking about the situation with Cuba yes they should certainly get more weapons oh that's right we're getting them to them to protect their freedom from US imperialist.

    • @leviotten
      @leviotten 3 роки тому +3

      @John Smith lol shut up "john smith"

    • @Airdrifting
      @Airdrifting 3 роки тому +10

      @@RobertStrafford Hong Kong was stolen by a pirate nation and later returned to its rightful owner, you made it sound like China took it by force. The pirate nation always treated Hong Kong natives as second rated citizens, ruled with an iron fist, appointed governors, controlled every aspect of Hong Kong with white people, while brainwashing its citizens with lies and distorted facts. If Taiwanese has any so called "freedom", they should have access to unbiased information instead of all the lies west told, and they would make the correct choice to reunite with mainland instead of being a US pawn in slowing China's down. Taiwan has been the aggressor for the past 10 years, always changing the status quo using fear propaganda, lies and brainwashing, oh right they didn't you the truth in the west, because you are just another tool in the 0.1% controlled herd.

    • @user-ug1rn3vk1u
      @user-ug1rn3vk1u 2 роки тому +6

      @@RobertStrafford “protect their freedom” yeah ,you Anglo-Saxons are so lack of imagination , it is the only excuse you can find when you want invate other conutries.
      just like what you have done in Iraq, Afghan,serbia ....unfortunately, you lost your chance to "uphode justice" in Aisa. i mean korean war in 1950. we can beat you before 70 years ago , we can also beat you again today..

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 3 роки тому

    Keep up the excellent work

  • @sh1nyarm0r
    @sh1nyarm0r 3 роки тому +32

    Good work, Binkov!

  • @seanlu8832
    @seanlu8832 3 роки тому +147

    Actually, if you look at the video closely, there are three more type 094 in the back ground.

    • @robertfoster4070
      @robertfoster4070 3 роки тому +9

      So what ! They have never been to war o. The last 200 years and we the us are supposed to ..?
      Wake up !!!

    • @user-um4kj7lo6y
      @user-um4kj7lo6y 3 роки тому +42

      @@robertfoster4070 Study history carefully and then talk about it

    • @gugeg7579
      @gugeg7579 3 роки тому +21

      @@robertfoster4070 FYI, type 094 carries nuke missile so.... , I don’t think US wanna see a 094 launching anything

    • @fireballyang7310
      @fireballyang7310 3 роки тому +5

      @@robertfoster4070 That is exactly what Japanese said before they get nuked.

    • @user-um4kj7lo6y
      @user-um4kj7lo6y 3 роки тому +21

      I am very happy to see the 094 nuclear submarine on display. This means that 096 strategic nuclear submarines have been in service. It is equipped with JL-3 . It does not need to go out of the military port to the dangerous sea. Nuclear bomb can hit the United States directly!😆😆

  • @psxhum
    @psxhum 3 роки тому +17

    00:38 they had 3 more nuclear submarines in the background on top right screen. If you check, they are all type 096.

    • @fsAirCobra
      @fsAirCobra 2 роки тому

      no, 096 is still in construction. they are all 094

    • @roj22fetals6
      @roj22fetals6 2 роки тому

      the 096 is still ongoing, so it's not.

  • @Hadrexus
    @Hadrexus 3 роки тому +65

    When you cancel all ground forces and airplane production and focus only on CV DD stacks in Darkest Hour.

  • @anoopsinghbhakuni9132
    @anoopsinghbhakuni9132 3 роки тому +86

    China : we are dangerous
    Japan : ohh really, Le radioactive nuclear waste in ocean

    • @Runningbowels
      @Runningbowels 3 роки тому +4

      lol

    • @triatheraider1612
      @triatheraider1612 3 роки тому +6

      LMAO I just remembered they're dumping radio active waste

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 3 роки тому +7

      Japan has long been mishandling nuclear waste, this is nothing to laugh about, it also has 8000 tons of plutonium ( enough to wipe out earth), it was told to adjust it's reactors but dragging it's feet

    • @AnonymousSong
      @AnonymousSong 3 роки тому +9

      Seems like India will not be influenced by that. Keep laughing

    • @bearie66
      @bearie66 3 роки тому +4

      Good call, reminded us who is the most dangerous species on earth.

  • @mayuri4184
    @mayuri4184 3 роки тому +178

    Last I was this early, the Chinese had treasure ships.

    • @robertdixon5266
      @robertdixon5266 3 роки тому +1

      That’s not even funny

    • @gibetax8477
      @gibetax8477 3 роки тому +6

      @@robertdixon5266 she was not trying to be funny

    • @elig3671
      @elig3671 3 роки тому +25

      @素食吉祥净心净土 china big gay

    • @fateavaraccus6563
      @fateavaraccus6563 3 роки тому +2

      @@elig3671, 😂😂😂

    • @fateavaraccus6563
      @fateavaraccus6563 3 роки тому +9

      @素食吉祥净心净土 like that guy said " China big gay"

  • @titixiao3944
    @titixiao3944 2 роки тому +2

    Don't worry, it's just a fishing boat

  • @Knight6831
    @Knight6831 3 роки тому +7

    Hi Binkov
    Could you please do a who would win in hypothetical War between El Salvador and Honduras as they went to war in 1969 for 4 days in what is known as the Football War

    • @duitk
      @duitk 3 роки тому

      El Salvador would win again, both nations are corrupt, but Honduras is on a whole new level of corruption with entire battalions existing only on paper. El Salvador still has a lot of veterans from it's civil war and overall better funded and trained soldiers just because it's less corrupt.

  • @VRichardsn
    @VRichardsn 3 роки тому +88

    The South China Sea is going to be very hot...

    • @thing.1263
      @thing.1263 3 роки тому +26

      Yeah most of those country who border this sea are subtropical/tropical climate around 23c a year

    • @pacwoman7126
      @pacwoman7126 3 роки тому +1

      Well, the countries around the world are turning right and nationalim has become popular. Beside that the economy is stagating and maybe world economic crisis is coming. Maybe there will be ww3 like ww2 becaus of economic crisis.

    • @fishlivesmatter
      @fishlivesmatter 3 роки тому +7

      Philippines: **panting with very heavy sweating**

    • @easonhuang7117
      @easonhuang7117 3 роки тому +2

      @@fishlivesmatter Philippine is perfectly fine with the situation. Its economy grows so much after the rise of China. In fact, those ships aren't for Philippine. The three ships along can destroy the whole Philippine Navy.

    • @thing.1263
      @thing.1263 3 роки тому +1

      Fish Lives Matter lol what China will do with Philippines ?

  • @pac1fic055
    @pac1fic055 3 роки тому +42

    Ships look so fantastic when they are new. None of that unsightly rust.

    • @defencebangladesh4068
      @defencebangladesh4068 3 роки тому +1

      @ODENS EMISSARY lmao

    • @easonhuang7117
      @easonhuang7117 3 роки тому +3

      @ODENS EMISSARY They have been running for two years, and they are just commissioned these days. Plus, China's Chang'e-4 moon rover landed on the far side of the moon in 2018 is still alive and working. 😁🤞🤞

    • @ttw06090
      @ttw06090 3 роки тому +1

      @ODENS EMISSARY That's what happened when you are only willing to pay with peanuts, it doesn't mean they can't make better stuff

    • @diggingmystyle
      @diggingmystyle 2 роки тому

      There's nothing Dunn Edwards paint can't over.

  • @damsb.6078
    @damsb.6078 2 роки тому +63

    China never cease to impress, combine this navy with their coastal missile defense, I think there are top military strategists in the US who get some good headache these days...

    • @RobertStrafford
      @RobertStrafford 2 роки тому +2

      Then they pulled their heads out and got rid of the headache and reminded china who the big dog is and reminded China who is number one and that won't change.

    • @stewartbeche686
      @stewartbeche686 2 роки тому

      Destroy communist china....chinese government is of the devil

    • @stewartbeche686
      @stewartbeche686 2 роки тому +1

      @@RobertStrafford china suffers from sin...the of pride and revenge....this is not the spirit of a great nation

    • @stewartbeche686
      @stewartbeche686 2 роки тому

      @sadman sad boycott sll chinese goods...sell them nothing...kick their embassy out of each nation

    • @ahmadashraf2728
      @ahmadashraf2728 2 роки тому +2

      @@RobertStrafford superpotty america is nothing without saudi arab petro dollar system😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @dataman6744
    @dataman6744 2 роки тому +5

    Type055 looks great

  • @ottoheinrichwehmann2252
    @ottoheinrichwehmann2252 3 роки тому +35

    Taiwan invasion video had to be update soon.

    • @tianyicai6482
      @tianyicai6482 3 роки тому

      invasion? must massacre them

    • @malimrav24
      @malimrav24 3 роки тому +1

      With incompetent Biden admin. on power I wouldn't be surprised if they then go on Australia, New Zealand and even Japan.

    • @bjorn7427
      @bjorn7427 3 роки тому

      I bet its on Beijing Olympics. People are distracted about west vs china politcs and dramas. Then it is a good time to strike. Athletes were hostages and people are unprepared.

    • @mxn1948
      @mxn1948 3 роки тому +2

      @@bjorn7427 hostages? lol you think some athletes that aren't important for national defence is gonna sway the decision to go to war one way or the other?

    • @DMCS1917
      @DMCS1917 3 роки тому

      @@bjorn7427 Beijing Olympics will be the new Berlin Olympics, same as how if navalny dies he may be the new archduke Franz Ferdinand.

  • @paulox1984
    @paulox1984 3 роки тому +19

    make more frequent videos Binkov i want to stuff like modern day holy war and aliens vs earth!! Italy attacks Malta etc etc :)

  • @luismonterrosa4699
    @luismonterrosa4699 3 роки тому +13

    The so called "Cold War 2.0" is gonna be pretty short...

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims 2 роки тому

      That’s what they thought in 1947

  • @urbielatenightgamingadvent567
    @urbielatenightgamingadvent567 3 роки тому +4

    Let the game beginning! What a time to be alive. I am excited

  • @cbrtdgh4210
    @cbrtdgh4210 3 роки тому +3

    That naval base is right by Yalong bay in Hainan. They ask the tourists on the scenic resort of the nearby mountain to please refrain from taking photos of the naval base xD
    You can clearly see the submarines there.

  • @kingofapex9493
    @kingofapex9493 3 роки тому +101

    When you add 3 new ships into your fleet, you're a threat. But when you add another 300 new ships, you're world peace keeper. lol

    • @BroadHobbyProjects
      @BroadHobbyProjects 3 роки тому

      Or its destroyer. Lol

    • @user-ui5yv9lc8c
      @user-ui5yv9lc8c 3 роки тому

      Kenny Powers are you mean the US?

    • @liftedj7544
      @liftedj7544 3 роки тому +16

      Authoritarian nations will always be a threat to individual right. Seems pretty common sense lol

    • @robbmaier368
      @robbmaier368 3 роки тому

      But when you lie and only painted some old ones or had them ALLREADY and only fooling your self of such in the compisit CONECTION of ONES insett is the condition of such to DELIVER and not have a parades

    • @kingofapex9493
      @kingofapex9493 3 роки тому +21

      @@liftedj7544 Seems pretty common sense if you're brainwashed by western propaganda. lol

  • @shinlin7615
    @shinlin7615 3 роки тому +2

    there were 4 7500 tons 052d destroyers commissioned this year already with 5 more to be commissioned later this year.
    there were 2 12500 tons 055 destroyers commissioned this year already with 2 more to be commissioned later this year.
    there was 1 40000 tons 075 LHD commissioned this year already with 1more to be commissioned later this year.

  • @mazon_666
    @mazon_666 3 роки тому +1

    nice content... theres an actual video👍👍👍👍

  • @muslimDeen137
    @muslimDeen137 3 роки тому +27

    We have had decades of greater Peace... Now our generation will witness the pain our ancestors have already endured.

    • @Wolfen443
      @Wolfen443 3 роки тому +2

      We barely had about a Century of long peace mostly, sadly.

    • @thebigsad5402
      @thebigsad5402 3 роки тому

      @@Wolfen443 we have had smaller conflicts over the years but nothing world changing like ww1 and ww2 had.

    • @chenchen6150
      @chenchen6150 3 роки тому +1

      Big war eventualy happen one day sadly no one really know when and where ti will start if war is happening stay safe guys there ain't internet and electricity for quite some times.

    • @user-nm5ui6dk7j
      @user-nm5ui6dk7j 3 роки тому +4

      Believe me, the world will come to peace without the USA military

    • @thebigsad5402
      @thebigsad5402 3 роки тому +2

      @@user-nm5ui6dk7j People probably said that about the British empire. Peace isn't gonna happen even if the US military was gone. Another nation would take its place and it would probably be even worse.
      If you want to have peace, you must be prepare for war.

  • @user-qf6yt3id3w
    @user-qf6yt3id3w 3 роки тому +11

    We all need to mock China for not having an F-35B equivalent to put on the LPH ships. That way they'll spend a fortune developing one.

    • @joaquincimas1707
      @joaquincimas1707 3 роки тому +5

      Stonks war mentality.
      Good comment, sir.

    • @blueben1224
      @blueben1224 3 роки тому +2

      We don’t need that shit.

    • @thing.1263
      @thing.1263 3 роки тому +1

      Xianpai Zeng lol

    • @user-qf6yt3id3w
      @user-qf6yt3id3w 3 роки тому +4

      ​@@joaquincimas1707 F-35Bs really are a problem for China. If they don't develop an equivalent then the US and its allies will have an advantage in a war because they can fly fast and stealthy jets from LPHs and improvised airfields which will make it very hard to ground their airforce by destroying airstrips, something they've already got an advantage in because it's basically China vs the world which means the allies have a lot of bases. On the other hand, it's clear that the F-35B was an absolute nightmare to get working and that Chinese aerospace finds it hard to make an F-18 knockoff, let alone an F-35B. China's J-15 is a Su-33 knock-off and is called the 'flopping fish' by the Chinese press for its unreliability. This doesn't bode well for a Chinese stealthy, supersonic and STOVL fighter which is what it needs to counter the F-35B. And without it China would run out of airfields and carriers to fly fast jets from in a war, and that means it would lose air superiority. At that point, it's lost the war. And losing a war is not a good thing for the CCP which needs to project an aura of invincibility lest the Chinese people start to challenge its rule domestically. Expect to see more 'mass incidents' and more mid-level CCP thugs going the way the Securitate did in the Romanian Revolution. Come to think of it, that didn't work out too well for Ceaucescu either.
      Ho hum. Decisions decisions.

    • @aburetik4866
      @aburetik4866 3 роки тому +1

      @@user-qf6yt3id3w J20 will shoot down all those sheety F35Bs, as the battle field is not far away from China's coast line. And due to F35B's extremely short combat range and payload, the LPHs will be destroyed before it even gets close to Taiwan or China mainland.
      And it's not China vs. world. Russia's got thousands of nukes aiming at all American cities

  • @legoseller4496
    @legoseller4496 3 роки тому +2

    That comparison with the current tonnage of the RN really puts the size of the respective navies, and the positions of their respective countries in the world order, into perspective.

  • @crazywarriorscatfan9061
    @crazywarriorscatfan9061 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for always giving reliable and unbiased information as always! Though, I feel like I can see storm clouds on the horizon.

  • @DemonNitrix
    @DemonNitrix 3 роки тому +49

    "Thos who control the skies controls the entire war".

    • @eightlivesnow1644
      @eightlivesnow1644 3 роки тому +1

      Damn good we control the skies then.

    • @seebauong9593
      @seebauong9593 3 роки тому +4

      The war can turn very ugly, both sides might blast their enemy navigation satellites in space into pieces and put them out of service so that the fighter jets/bombers have less precision in targeting enemy position on the ground.

    • @danwaite5481
      @danwaite5481 3 роки тому +17

      Didn’t work in Vietnam for USA who lost the war.

    • @eightlivesnow1644
      @eightlivesnow1644 3 роки тому +2

      @@danwaite5481 I mean, Vietnam is our ally and we killed more of them then they did of us. Sure the short term seems like a loss but the long term gains make it a win.

    • @danwaite5481
      @danwaite5481 3 роки тому +16

      @@eightlivesnow1644 not really. USA never achieved their military intention to colonise North Vietnam, plus I wouldn’t say they are a US Ally. Plus China pushed USA from its boarder back to the 38th Parallel with no air support in the Korean War.

  • @kuduzdoktorhektor3494
    @kuduzdoktorhektor3494 3 роки тому +53

    Economic crisis, increased arms spending, open threats of superpowers to each other + pandemic. What is inevitable nears closer and closer. Winter is coming.

    • @lizexi7115
      @lizexi7115 3 роки тому +3

      am gonna break my ankle and force me to not get drafted

    • @tclem14
      @tclem14 3 роки тому

      the instablitily of covid allowed for this to happen.

    • @tritium1998
      @tritium1998 3 роки тому

      Sucks for the countries with crap economies and arms then.

    • @blardymunggas6884
      @blardymunggas6884 3 роки тому +3

      lets see who will fall during a war. I think its coming soon and I’m can’t wait. Sick of all the media lies and hate against the chinese for no reason. I had enough of the west bullying tactics. Lets do it. Do it now. Come send your ships close, we will start in now. We will shoot first. Send your ships and planes to instigate. I need that at least. We will pull the first trigger to get the ball rolling

    • @mreastonmurphy
      @mreastonmurphy 2 роки тому

      If they are anything like you it won't be much of a fight boy. Real warriors and real technology over here.

  • @tyrionlannister4920
    @tyrionlannister4920 3 роки тому +1

    nice.
    especially the carrier

    • @blardymunggas6884
      @blardymunggas6884 3 роки тому +2

      What they launch is pure deception. China has something 10 times more powerful hidden. Let Murica talk and boasts. The harder they will fall. The difference between America and China is, Murica will brag its military power to science fiction level but the Chinese will always down play their actual powers.

  • @Texpantego
    @Texpantego 3 роки тому +1

    Any info on the quality of the personnel. Long running navies have a lot of institutional memory that is hard to replicate from scratch. Are the officer corp chosen on merit or political connections?

  • @mcfragger2605
    @mcfragger2605 3 роки тому +31

    U.S navy with 11 fleet carriers and another 10 LHDs along with their escort fleets:
    Oh nooo..... *anyway*

    • @Gamer-er6su
      @Gamer-er6su 3 роки тому +2

      Ballistic missiles dude they can kill us with those at least we have air supremacy but yea and our allies to I hope it's a long war as that means no nukes involved plus Russia preparing for invasion of the Ukraine I'm a proud American

    • @chief-executive
      @chief-executive 3 роки тому +1

      @@Gamer-er6su Their ballistic missiles is pretty much why the F-35 exists

    • @chief-executive
      @chief-executive 3 роки тому +2

      Just to be clear, the F-35 can take out ballistic missiles.

    • @Gamer-er6su
      @Gamer-er6su 3 роки тому

      @@chief-executive yea I guess but there almost bottomless manpower but yea we can win a war 1 one on one but 2 on 1 yea we lose but we have NATO and a lot of people fight along side

    • @Wolfen443
      @Wolfen443 3 роки тому

      So, the U.S. Navy will be like the Japanese in the Pacific WWII, the British in Atlantic at the same time, the Italians in the Mediterranean?. Lots of ships to deploy but the logistics, some outdated technology, and costs to replace or carry out an actual war will not keep up with the needs of an actual conflict maybe. We were able to do that in the Pacific in WWII only after Germany surrendered really.

  • @legendslog3911
    @legendslog3911 3 роки тому +11

    Their ship building speed is amazing

    • @fredweller1086
      @fredweller1086 3 роки тому +1

      My son can slap Legos together quickly too.

    • @user-qu8zq2ve7x
      @user-qu8zq2ve7x 3 роки тому +8

      @@fredweller1086 Although China has 56 100,000-ton shipyards and 30 300,000-ton shipyards. But I still find the Lego in your son's hand more frightening...LOL

    • @fredweller1086
      @fredweller1086 3 роки тому +1

      @@user-qu8zq2ve7x At least I'd trust the watertight doors on his Lego ship.
      LOL

    • @tritium1998
      @tritium1998 3 роки тому +4

      @@fredweller1086 Good for him. Nothing you can do about other countries making Legos either.

    • @fredweller1086
      @fredweller1086 3 роки тому +1

      @@tritium1998 You can pretend as much as you like. CCP ships are shiat. I work in a US shipyard. Our lower paid workers make more in one hour than the semi skilled wage slave commies make in a day. That's why the CCP HATES the free market. Their best ship workers would be here in a heartbeat.

  • @ZaHandle
    @ZaHandle 2 роки тому +2

    Warning: Toxic comment section, don’t side with any country or say goodbye to your notifications

  • @miketaylor6869
    @miketaylor6869 3 роки тому +7

    We are slowly going to a fallout apocalypse scenario

  • @StarFyodperor
    @StarFyodperor 3 роки тому +3

    Someone's been playing a lot of Command and Conquer...

  • @aussieairconditioner8023
    @aussieairconditioner8023 3 роки тому +2

    Me: Im too young to be in the military
    Cadets: looming around the corner

  • @ashuramamun9488
    @ashuramamun9488 2 роки тому

    More equipment news like this please

  • @PT5-Shorts
    @PT5-Shorts 3 роки тому +4

    2 views 37 comments and 2 seconds ago released

  • @BrezelCeviche
    @BrezelCeviche 3 роки тому +45

    Chinese Raynor: "it's about time we take this revolution into overdrive"

    • @pieroog
      @pieroog 3 роки тому +6

      or rather: "hell, it's about time"

    • @rickv9180
      @rickv9180 3 роки тому +4

      A Starcraft reference
      Rare to see one nowadays

    • @jamescpalmer
      @jamescpalmer 3 роки тому

      You certainly enjoyed starcraft 2 my friend , salut.

    • @Seramics
      @Seramics 3 роки тому

      Blizzard stuff, rare.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 2 роки тому +1

      Russia must be Tycus in all this.

  • @benganchan1420
    @benganchan1420 2 роки тому +1

    Shanghai’s Jiangnan Shipyard, the world’s largest commercial shipyard which also build naval vessels considers navy boats under 110,000 ton deadweight as small boats . It has built 240,000 ton container ships , 220,000 ton cruise ships for customers worldwide . A 240,000 ton container ship would be completed inside 14 months.

  • @Joseph-mw2rl
    @Joseph-mw2rl 2 роки тому

    That zumwalt looks like my attempt at drawing the most futuristic battleship when I was 3

  • @gregorjefferson6610
    @gregorjefferson6610 3 роки тому +24

    Clicked this video faster than China can build a destroyer

  • @optionfinder
    @optionfinder 3 роки тому +57

    I give Taiwan a few years sadly

    • @tianyicai6482
      @tianyicai6482 3 роки тому +6

      invasion? must massacre them

    • @thiccchungo1041
      @thiccchungo1041 3 роки тому +18

      I root for them 100% but if China does try it I know they probably won’t stand a chance

    • @aaronrichards19886
      @aaronrichards19886 3 роки тому +17

      I dont think the US and Japan will allow that to happen.

    • @mirzahamzabaig5667
      @mirzahamzabaig5667 3 роки тому +14

      @@aaronrichards19886
      Well they will.. I don't think USA will want to go full collapse mode with the instability they have just so they could chase China for Taiwan..
      Also other US enemies will take advantage and attack other US allies.

    • @marquis77
      @marquis77 3 роки тому

      @@mirzahamzabaig5667 Uh, what? lol

  • @qingwan1883
    @qingwan1883 Рік тому +1

    Commissioned 3 ships in one single day. That has drastically increased their fishing capabilities. Their people will be well fed by all kinds of sea food.

  • @DaGoook
    @DaGoook 3 роки тому

    Comrade Binkov! Please do more content on the PLAN.

  • @randomuser5443
    @randomuser5443 3 роки тому +27

    Remember when germany pumped out so many ships. Didnt go well

    • @donjobi9400
      @donjobi9400 3 роки тому +3

      Yes the time go near....

    • @huarongliu8938
      @huarongliu8938 3 роки тому +32

      Yes,they invaded so many countries during ww2,just like the US invaded dozens of countries in a few decades,When a 15trillion economy surrouned by 400 US military bases, better built more ships to protect yourself

    • @easonhuang7117
      @easonhuang7117 3 роки тому +7

      That means the US is not going to end well. 😁🤞🤞😁🤞🤞

    • @holyboxer2.072
      @holyboxer2.072 3 роки тому +28

      Lmao, China may be the most peaceful country in the rising process
      Look at what other countries have done in their rise?
      UK: invaded and robbed almost every country on earth
      Germany: Nazis、WWI and WWII
      Japan: invaded the whole East and Southeast Asia, killing more than 30 million innocent civilians
      The United States: launched more than 30 aggressive wars in 50 years.
      Since 1979, China has never been at war with any country, and has never occupied any country.

    • @toyaz
      @toyaz 3 роки тому +7

      @@holyboxer2.072 truth hurts man, they dont teach this on history classes

  • @hiyorisarugaki1830
    @hiyorisarugaki1830 3 роки тому +5

    The Royal Navy's total tonnage is 650,000. Not 114k.
    you compared only destroyers and frigates against Chinese subs, destroyers, cruisers, and landing docks.
    Britain too has Landing docks, aircraft carriers, and Subs.
    Compare it to the German Navy.

  • @xxxxxxxGTR
    @xxxxxxxGTR 2 роки тому

    The super-large missile cruiser(not destroyer) is under construction, with a displacement of 28,000 tons. The cruiser will be able to carry various types of missiles with larger volumes, including longer-range hypersonic carrier-based anti-ship missiles.

  • @jonathankim993
    @jonathankim993 3 роки тому

    Can you make the vids of complex warfare between us and allies versus china and its allies?

  • @user-gc1hg9sp9k
    @user-gc1hg9sp9k 3 роки тому +17

    meanwhile my country lost 1 submarine recently, rip KRI naggala 402 :(

    • @arghadeepchoudhury7250
      @arghadeepchoudhury7250 3 роки тому +4

      Sorry for your loss brother
      Much love and respect to the soldiers from India

    • @madmarvshighwaywarrior2870
      @madmarvshighwaywarrior2870 3 роки тому +4

      I express my sympathies as well. It's really difficult to survive a sinking sub. Reminds me of the Kursk.

    • @user-nl2js1bk1p
      @user-nl2js1bk1p 3 роки тому +3

      Need some update, they are too old. Maybe you can buy some of Chinese?

    • @peterw5840
      @peterw5840 3 роки тому

      hard to imagine how the sailors felt when sinking...

    • @pennnnn.
      @pennnnn. 3 роки тому

      @@user-nl2js1bk1p sadly,No new submarine until 2024

  • @spaceempire
    @spaceempire 3 роки тому +8

    I was waiting for the "and remember, binkov may talk about hypothetical wars, but only real peace can bring us all together".
    Watched till the end, disappointed:(

  • @handhand212
    @handhand212 3 роки тому +1

    The new battle field 4 trailer looks good

  • @useurbrain999
    @useurbrain999 3 роки тому

    "0:36", upper right of the scene, 3 more 094 ballistic submarines side by side...

  • @lamindarboe451
    @lamindarboe451 3 роки тому +6

    They have the largest navy in the world. And they are developing a cutting-edge technology weapons all the time.. Diffinetly gearing up for something.

  • @mohsin69420
    @mohsin69420 3 роки тому +29

    so these are the ships we are going to be fighting soon

    • @testserver2054
      @testserver2054 3 роки тому +2

      If their not then their just a waste of money to maintain

    • @filipeareias3265
      @filipeareias3265 3 роки тому

      preocupa-te com a pobreza no teu pais em vez de meterem na vida dos outros que n vai haver guerra que eu saiba america nao tem mar nessa zona

    • @lucidnonsense942
      @lucidnonsense942 3 роки тому

      @@testserver2054 you really misunderstand the primary role of a Navy.

    • @AKlover
      @AKlover 3 роки тому +4

      I doubt Biden would attack his owners to defend Taiwan.

    • @filipeareias3265
      @filipeareias3265 3 роки тому

      @@AKlover n vai haver guerra nenhuma

  • @jxmai7687
    @jxmai7687 2 роки тому

    0:36 look carefully, it is 6 ships and subs in the picture.

  • @Qwertyuiop-bj8ry
    @Qwertyuiop-bj8ry 2 роки тому

    How did you find these clips?

  • @s.a928
    @s.a928 3 роки тому +45

    Can you do a scenario where the current tensions in Ukraine turn into a war?

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims 3 роки тому +7

      There’s already a Video

    • @RNS681
      @RNS681 3 роки тому +1

      @@looinrims with allies involved?

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims 3 роки тому +1

      @@RNS681 none of them include allies as a given so Idk what you’re looking for

    • @ondrejbublavy7952
      @ondrejbublavy7952 3 роки тому +8

      It's already over, Russia withdrew most of their troops

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims 3 роки тому +3

      @Arnaldo Gonzalez I wouldn’t call denying ww3 and not committing a war of aggression (ie war crimes) to be ‘chickening out’, what kinda neckbeard POV is that?

  • @SlavicCoffee
    @SlavicCoffee 3 роки тому +56

    Uh oh.. we got to start building battleship’s & bunkers again!.

    • @redenginner
      @redenginner 3 роки тому +5

      Eh,its not really a problem. China’s military has the equipment but it lacks inter service co-operation due to having a surprisingly competition based military system.

    • @Gentleman...Driver
      @Gentleman...Driver 3 роки тому +7

      @@redenginner Also the Chinese dont have as much of equipment as the US has, and they lag global strategic partners and bases. They are quiet isolated to be honest. India is basicly a next door rival, along with the much smaller South Koreans and Japanese. Russia never was sure of how much to support them, because they want to be superior.

    • @duckling9854
      @duckling9854 3 роки тому

      To house the homeless ?

    • @SlavicCoffee
      @SlavicCoffee 3 роки тому +1

      Hmm.. you’re right tho just in case it ain’t a bad idea to build bunkers at least.

    • @driller7714
      @driller7714 3 роки тому +1

      Nah. China is a paper tiger. Their weapon systems are obsolete and non functioning. Only in the mind of the Chinese propaganda machine do these things even function. China has zero battle experience and the tech they do have is second rate knockoff stolen American tech...outdated tech. Doubt me? Ask yourself this. Does a Chinese knockoff Rolex have the same precision craftsmanship and function as the real thing? No it doesn’t. Neither does the Chicom knockoff military equipment.

  • @mengguo3018
    @mengguo3018 3 роки тому +1

    0:37 on the right top corner what do you see?

  • @kughalumulatonu1259
    @kughalumulatonu1259 3 роки тому +10

    Great Dragon awakes.

  • @zinjanthropus322
    @zinjanthropus322 3 роки тому +24

    China is in world war mode while NATO is taking an afternoon nap.

    • @user-um4kj7lo6y
      @user-um4kj7lo6y 3 роки тому

      Europeans, please wake up and don't worry about the Americans. We have no direct conflict, you should worry about the Russians

    • @gabenewell3955
      @gabenewell3955 3 роки тому +1

      @@user-um4kj7lo6y Russia should worry about nato because they are the issue not Russia

    • @danmaster9183
      @danmaster9183 3 роки тому +1

      America backed uo europe in the last world war its only right that they return the favor in the next one

    • @isunlloaoll
      @isunlloaoll 3 роки тому +5

      The US isn't taking a nap, Australia isn't taking a nap, and non NATO allied like Japan isn't taking a nap. The Chinese are building impressive things very fast, but thats only to fill the massive gap it has with the US navy and air force.
      The US navy is still the undisputed navy in the world, and its building new ships on a massive scale too on top of a already very robust fleet. All this is just posturing by china to show off it's build up, but geopolitically china is still blocked up by layers of us allies and assets.

    • @johnhodge1263
      @johnhodge1263 3 роки тому +2

      @@isunlloaoll America has over700 bases around the world bringing American style democracy to a doorstep near you.

  • @TempestMMR
    @TempestMMR 3 роки тому +29

    I think its about time we start to understand the made in China sticker. we get the crap products they keep the good stuff. USA does this too. most notorious is the m1 export version

    • @akltom
      @akltom 3 роки тому +19

      that's not china's fault, it's your suppliers fault, they are ordering craps for you guys. you can not expect china spend $2 to make you a dollar product... it's all about business. as long as peoples are still paying for those low quality stuffs, your suppliers will keep doing this, we call this demand, businesses are working for demand.

    • @chenchen6150
      @chenchen6150 3 роки тому

      Check the supllier first mate

    • @huarongliu8938
      @huarongliu8938 3 роки тому +5

      I am doing silver jewelry business in China for almost 10 years,most of our products are less than 10 usd,our profit are around 20%,our clients usually sell at 50-200 usd per piece .
      If you ask them to add 5 usd more,we can provide better quality products,many clients won't accept and think you are crazy.

    • @fluxtheory3136
      @fluxtheory3136 2 роки тому

      Much like how chocolate bars shrink over time to hide inflation, people laughing at "Cheap chinese crap" never get it through their dumbs skulls that what's really occuring is their currency becoming more and more worthless. The chinese build things to spec. Which means if you're receiving crap, someone made sure it was that way and decided that's what you were worthy of consuming. Enjoy, things are about to get a whole lot worse.

  • @VP-nx9re
    @VP-nx9re 3 роки тому +6

    this is what you can see. imagine those that hiding as secret weapon.

    • @tritium1998
      @tritium1998 3 роки тому +1

      Countries often focus on submarines for secret weapons since they can't be seen let alone counted as easily.

    • @downwithputinsaveukraine1313
      @downwithputinsaveukraine1313 3 роки тому

      China and Russia are known to brag about what they don't actually have, historically.

    • @user-mj9sp8ub6n
      @user-mj9sp8ub6n 2 роки тому +2

      @@downwithputinsaveukraine1313 us is known to brag about what they will never have, historically.

  • @trah2205
    @trah2205 3 роки тому +21

    For those arguing china's an expansionist who seek to kill and conquer, i'll just quote Putin that "When we evaluate other people, states and nations, we always seem to be looking in the mirror. We always see ourselves. We always pass on to another person what we ourselves are in essence"

    • @gingerchili6567
      @gingerchili6567 3 роки тому +2

      Agreed your view.

    • @ceberskie119
      @ceberskie119 3 роки тому

      Tell that to the Fins in regards to their opinion of the Soviets in 1939 or to the Indian opinion of the UK? Or the native american opinion of the US or of Korean opinion of Japan. That statement is so hollow by exceptions to its rule its made a lie. I personally believe that statement is targeted specifically at the US and her core allies for whom its relevant.

    • @giuseppe9501
      @giuseppe9501 2 роки тому

      R.I.P to all the Chinese who died in the great leap forward. Wonder what they see in the mirror

  • @ccc-py9ih
    @ccc-py9ih 3 роки тому +3

    It is really strange that the US Navy is the strongest in the world. But no one is worried about war. China just joined two ships, and everyone is worried about war.

  • @aaryagathani
    @aaryagathani 3 роки тому +7

    No matter how many ships they build , Indian sticks and stones will still send shivers down thier spine.

    • @AnonymousSong
      @AnonymousSong 3 роки тому +4

      hahahahahahah alright

    • @nawazawanawan7745
      @nawazawanawan7745 3 роки тому +1

      Again 🤦🤦🤦🤦 told you guys get rid of bollywood movies
      Reality is different

  • @ihabcharife4350
    @ihabcharife4350 3 роки тому

    When I saw the ys fleet I changed my mind

  • @namelesswarrior4760
    @namelesswarrior4760 3 роки тому +1

    There are another 20 warships of different sizes and capabilities coming online within the next 10yrs and 3 more aircraft carriers in the same period as well.

  • @SergeantKillGore
    @SergeantKillGore 3 роки тому +22

    Impressive looking ships no doubt. I only hope that they aren’t used in pursuit of further antagonizing China’s neighbors... Unfortunately we all know that’s a pipe dream.

    • @Kayzef2003
      @Kayzef2003 3 роки тому +9

      They will probably be used just like USA uses its ships. Go around the world breaking stuff.

    • @SergeantKillGore
      @SergeantKillGore 3 роки тому +1

      @@Kayzef2003 Probably. We can only pray the two never come into conflict with one another or the whole world will pay the price.

    • @mirzahamzabaig5667
      @mirzahamzabaig5667 3 роки тому +1

      @@SergeantKillGore
      Nah.. us Southern and Western neighbors of China re pretty chill with them.

    • @ethanliu3048
      @ethanliu3048 3 роки тому +1

      China only care about its terriority, Taiwan.
      I dont think there is a fight between CN and US except US fleet helps Taiwan independence.

  • @inevitableme6885
    @inevitableme6885 3 роки тому +5

    Imagine if aliens invade us now, they wont even know how they died

    • @user-um4kj7lo6y
      @user-um4kj7lo6y 3 роки тому +4

      Now, aliens will be killed in American Hollywood movies! Yes, aliens will only invade the United States. And speak english

    • @peterw5840
      @peterw5840 3 роки тому

      The Avengers would strike them down fo sho.

  • @HarveyZhang-yp9kp
    @HarveyZhang-yp9kp 2 роки тому +1

    Our Type-055 destroyer is a beauty! And, we are the best navy in the entire world, the PLAN, that is, People's Liberation Army Navy.

  • @winstonteo9207
    @winstonteo9207 2 роки тому +3

    Don't be surprise when they commission an entire fleet all at one go.

    • @_SamUSA_
      @_SamUSA_ 2 роки тому

      That would just be more for China to lose in the end.

  • @Ianmundo
    @Ianmundo 3 роки тому +4

    all the ships and none of the experience to operate them

    • @edward5228
      @edward5228 3 роки тому +3

      Which country wants to become the 'experience' to those ships?

  • @irritatedanglosaxon1705
    @irritatedanglosaxon1705 3 роки тому +18

    The remaining question is when Chinese warships do the patrols around the world ? It always good to see when warships sailing across California bay in the name of FREE navigation

    • @peraltaisrael2598
      @peraltaisrael2598 3 роки тому +4

      Sure they can. Who says they can’t? As long as they’re in international waters. No problem. Unless you sail in international waters around china.. apparently there is “problems.” Right chinese bot?

    • @nawtilismaelis2043
      @nawtilismaelis2043 3 роки тому +3

      Freedom of navigation drills are done in international waters that China trying to take over.

    • @stella-8501
      @stella-8501 3 роки тому +1

      @@peraltaisrael2598 well California bay according to international law (rrside by Russia) was also International waters, do u get it, huh.. Bots??!!

    • @irritatedanglosaxon1705
      @irritatedanglosaxon1705 3 роки тому

      @Mike Quick yea can't wait that Chinese warships also sailing near our east coast in name of FREE navigations

    • @FirstLast-vr7es
      @FirstLast-vr7es 3 роки тому +3

      @@irritatedanglosaxon1705 The US isn't claiming international waters as its own territory, so your entire argument is moot. If you think what China is doing in the South China Sea is in any way reasonable, then you're either one of them or you're just uninformed.

  • @Enigmatus23
    @Enigmatus23 3 роки тому

    Questions need to be asked about the build quality of these ships

  • @azazzelx
    @azazzelx 3 роки тому +1

    hmmm... interesting times ahead..

  • @andrewlancefield3730
    @andrewlancefield3730 3 роки тому +12

    Thank God someone can soon stand up to the USA and counter their aggressive expansion

    • @hacienda2490
      @hacienda2490 3 роки тому +2

      +Andrew Lancefield
      "Their aggressive expansion"
      Meanwhile, China regularly threatens to invade Taiwan and claims the enitrety of the S. China sea.

    • @brokenpotato438
      @brokenpotato438 3 роки тому +2

      @@hacienda2490 hes probably a bot, he wont see your comment

    • @HFrevive
      @HFrevive 2 роки тому +3

      @@hacienda2490 for real, why do Americans even got the guts to speak about wars, it's assuming to see.
      The U.S. Has Been At War 222 Out of 239 Years, 93% of the time.
      China fought 3 wars, in sum of 5 years out of its 72 years of existence, 7%.

    • @hacienda2490
      @hacienda2490 2 роки тому +1

      @@HFrevive
      Ok? That doesn't give China the go ahead to bully its neighbors. Don't know why you think it does.

    • @HFrevive
      @HFrevive 2 роки тому +1

      @@hacienda2490 did i say it does? I am not going to argue about the de jure claims of china that is inheireted through Qing dynasty and republic of China.
      What I am saying is, you don't have the right say SHIT. you are still booming the middle east, if you love peace so much, tell biden through your democracy to stop this nonsense. got it dixie boi?

  • @retrogaminggenesis6102
    @retrogaminggenesis6102 3 роки тому +12

    *BRING BACK THE IOWA CLASS!!!*

    • @Grim_Yeeter
      @Grim_Yeeter 3 роки тому +3

      GIV EM RAILGUNS AND NUKES

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 3 роки тому

      That would be more expensive and time consuming than designing and building an entirely new BB class. The Iowas would need a complete overhaul, a new propulsion system, and God only knows what else to be relevant surface combattants on a modern battlefield. They'd have to strip them down to bare hulls just to replace the boilers and turbines and then put the ship back together. Better to start with a whole new hull and build the ship to purpose from the start.

    • @VisibilityFoggy
      @VisibilityFoggy 3 роки тому

      They did it once already...

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 3 роки тому +1

      @@VisibilityFoggy that was in the 80s. They're much older now and went through another decade of wear and tear in the 80s-90s. Also the first time they were in the Navy Reserve. Now they're museums and have had many of their primary systems deactivated.

  • @wdfaseer5898
    @wdfaseer5898 2 роки тому +1

    055 destroyer is the most interesting one, its 112-cell vertical missiles launching system is the strongest in the world.

  • @miltontan65
    @miltontan65 2 роки тому

    😲 wow 😲, astonishing!🥰

  • @vonpredator
    @vonpredator 3 роки тому +6

    Canada should buy some ships and subs from china.... we buy everything else from them already.....