A Tour Inside China's Massive Type 055 Destroyer

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 вер 2024
  • In this video we go onboard the PLA Navy's Type 055 destroyer, the DDG105 Dalian. We get a peak at how Chinese Navy sailors live, work and fight, and a live-fire drill of the ship's main gun.
    Want to support the channel? - / eurasianavalinsight
    www.buymeacoff...
    Keywords: PLA, PLAN, Chinese Navy, modern warships, naval technology, Type 055, Renhai class, Type 1130, CIWS

КОМЕНТАРІ • 627

  • @cabasadefogo9533
    @cabasadefogo9533 6 місяців тому +301

    The type 55 is literally the Mclaren of warships! Sleek, modern, beautiful!

    • @钱逸成
      @钱逸成 6 місяців тому +10

      为啥不是 Ferrari ,昨天澳大利亚可是一二带回呀😊

    • @cabasadefogo9533
      @cabasadefogo9533 6 місяців тому +13

      @@钱逸成 but I like the mclarens more than Ferrari 🤣

    • @ralphkatsidis8338
      @ralphkatsidis8338 6 місяців тому

      @@钱逸成no its like a FOTON cars.

    • @TryoneDong
      @TryoneDong 6 місяців тому

      nice taste​@@cabasadefogo9533

    • @mala7794
      @mala7794 5 місяців тому +1

      Yeah but its chineese. Like the british type 45 destroyers radar can track more than 4000 targets. The chineese destroyer is just a copy of anericas arleigh burke class

  • @AnbomiYiliqi-sk1bs
    @AnbomiYiliqi-sk1bs 3 місяці тому +20

    The curve of 055 is simply elegant to the point of madness

  • @MaxSupercars
    @MaxSupercars 6 місяців тому +100

    Beautiful modern destroyer/cruiser. Hopefully she will be never used in any conflict.

  • @syncmaster915n
    @syncmaster915n 6 місяців тому +48

    Arguably the best fighting surface warship in the world. It can attack as well as defend.

    • @TruthSetsUfree100
      @TruthSetsUfree100 4 місяці тому

      China has never fought a naval war, your statement is just stupid. How can you even make that claim??

  • @Plavushan
    @Plavushan 6 місяців тому +81

    Really appreciate your analysis on an otherwise seldom discussed topic. 👍🏻

    • @fhetfet6402
      @fhetfet6402 6 місяців тому

      wumao...poor wumao...

  • @超翟-c5k
    @超翟-c5k 6 місяців тому +9

    As a retired sailor on a warship in China, what you see is only 10% of the bloggers of this warship. Why don't you talk about the radar bloggers of 055? Do you know the C4 neuron sensing system in the United States and the Guanyin system in China? In this era, warships are only a part of modern war, that is, the war between the United States and China. They are system confrontation, which is the confrontation between C4 and Guanyin. Under this system, it is the warship missile fighter radar electronic warfare. The United States lags behind China in every respect.

  • @guangzhouguide
    @guangzhouguide 6 місяців тому +33

    look the 01:24 that clean floors and furnishings, if you are once a naval guy who serviced in US or Russia navy, you will know this Chinese warship and her marines' actual combat effectiveness.

  • @DorJinTan
    @DorJinTan 6 місяців тому +241

    What a beautiful sea monster! 055!

    • @jaihindersingh
      @jaihindersingh 6 місяців тому +6

      Weeak flooatiing tofu shiips by cpp 😂

    • @fierrymarkpanggo8162
      @fierrymarkpanggo8162 6 місяців тому +7

      The design is so u.s. copy

    • @Itward985
      @Itward985 6 місяців тому +59

      @@fierrymarkpanggo8162 All I know is that the drawings for the new generation of US destroyers look like the 055, so who is copying who exactly🤣

    • @cityhunterhf
      @cityhunterhf 6 місяців тому +21

      @@Itward985 delete your post plz.
      The more ignorant the enemy, the more advantageous it is for us.

    • @snowlee-ml7rr
      @snowlee-ml7rr 6 місяців тому

      There are Endians in the comments. Envy, jealousy and hatred overflowed my screen. Let’s build more toilets in the cow dung country.

  • @hansudowolfrahm4856
    @hansudowolfrahm4856 6 місяців тому +184

    Wikipedia is strongly lacking behind the actual ships launched by PLAN. This channel gives a great overview of actual numbers, and even if it's not that neutral, it paints a very accurate picture.

    • @erwinlee2842
      @erwinlee2842 6 місяців тому

      What channel is neutral? The westerner channel is much biased towards USA and her allies.

    • @omnomnom5359
      @omnomnom5359 6 місяців тому +9

      Wikipedia just lacks maintainace funding

    • @zix_zix_zix
      @zix_zix_zix 6 місяців тому +36

      Why is it "not that neutral"? He provides accurate information and sticks to the facts, instead of making sensational comments.

    • @adamanderson3042
      @adamanderson3042 6 місяців тому +14

      ​@@zix_zix_zix I agree when it comes to the topic of Chinese things, which is why I stick around. However when the rare moment comes along where he offers his opinion on American programs like the Ford class and the F-35, his commentary is very sensational and indistinguishable from low-info Russian propaganda

    • @hansudowolfrahm4856
      @hansudowolfrahm4856 6 місяців тому +3

      @zix_zix_zix he's portraying accurate information, but sometimes he's unnecessary, prolonged rants about some things, which is okay since he's not making things up, just overstating some things. It doesn't happen often and hasn't happened recently, though, and it's the only small point of criticism I have. But I wouldn't have subscribed for like 2 years if that would be a major issue.

  • @RADICALFLOAT95
    @RADICALFLOAT95 6 місяців тому +110

    This video is actually genuinely underated and damm and this is actually the actual real China that the actual American and British BBC propaganda mainstream media actually don't show you is actually really like and actually capable of actually doing and damm and this is actually surreal and ❤😂🎉🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳

    • @diyonthefly
      @diyonthefly 6 місяців тому

      Anyone that uses "Actually" that many times in a statement is Definitely a propagandist sponsored by china.

    • @DaGoook
      @DaGoook 5 місяців тому +1

      Settle down comrade. Western media is very honest about how capable the PLAN is. Glad you are actually proud of the actual improvement and actual level of modernity your cruiser, I mean destroyer actually possesses.

    • @RADICALFLOAT95
      @RADICALFLOAT95 5 місяців тому +1

      @@DaGoook l actually agree with you and this world actually genuinely needs more people actually like you in this world and you are so kind.

    • @DaGoook
      @DaGoook 5 місяців тому

      @@RADICALFLOAT95开心就好

  • @yttean98
    @yttean98 6 місяців тому +31

    A comprehensive summary.

  • @horridohobbies
    @horridohobbies 6 місяців тому +63

    Western military analysts are jealous. They will never admit how truly impressive the Type 055 is.

    • @omarionbayley9721
      @omarionbayley9721 6 місяців тому

      Jealous of what may i ask??? U people forget all of those Chinese designs even their aircraft were taken from the west mostly from the US right??? So I don't know what is there to be jealous about, and yet still you're here watching the proganda

    • @horridohobbies
      @horridohobbies 6 місяців тому +1

      @@omarionbayley9721 Complete rubbish. You don't know what the fuck you're talking. You're spouting typical Western propaganda bullshit.

    • @hbc511
      @hbc511 6 місяців тому

      ​@@omarionbayley9721yeah so what.

    • @dddddh1
      @dddddh1 6 місяців тому +9

      ​@@omarionbayley9721😂那你们怎么造不出来?又是经典的,我们偷了你们没有的东西😂

    • @omarionbayley9721
      @omarionbayley9721 6 місяців тому +5

      @@hbc511 there is nothing to be jealous about

  • @versatrade1
    @versatrade1 4 місяці тому +8

    Sam, I have been following you in airplanes all over the globe. Your journeys into the world of different planes and carriers were very exciting, no doubt.
    But this one has surpassed everything - as I wanted to know more about Chinese war ships.
    My Indian friends don't like China's advancement in science, technology and esp. in defence tech. But we🇧🇫📷 love China. 🇧🇩, 🇵🇰, Maldives, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Myanmarr

  • @horridohobbies
    @horridohobbies 6 місяців тому +27

    Impressive. Most impressive.

  • @phils4634
    @phils4634 6 місяців тому +76

    Impressive vessel, and the PLAN already have 8 (of the intended 16) in service. Seems almost in the "light cruiser" league, especially considering the VLS firepower.

    • @IrishCarney
      @IrishCarney 6 місяців тому +11

      Not almost, and more like a heavy cruiser despite the lack of large caliber guns given their displacement and hard-hitting long range missile firepower

    • @Dordord
      @Dordord 6 місяців тому +1

      9

    • @xzdrtxyzxvn
      @xzdrtxyzxvn 5 місяців тому +4

      its a heavy cruiser and armed with hypersonic missile is deadly..

    • @xzdrtxyzxvn
      @xzdrtxyzxvn 5 місяців тому +5

      ​@@IrishCarneyHigh calibre guns are old fashion.. The most important is the hypersonic missile they carried and can target point to point target.. These hypersonic missiles are deadly and can sink aircaft carrier.

    • @Dordord
      @Dordord 5 місяців тому +2

      now it's 10

  • @bradgolding6847
    @bradgolding6847 6 місяців тому +30

    What a beautiful ship!!! Another excellent video ENI, many thanks!

  • @warmcast3188
    @warmcast3188 6 місяців тому +8

    The lack of windows would be more to do or just as much to do with preventing electromagnetic radiation escaping from the ship.
    The ship is basically a big Faraday cage.

  • @danielmartin7838
    @danielmartin7838 5 місяців тому +23

    It’s astonishing to see how quickly China has built the world’s second largest navy. I’ve always said “China builds, thinks and acts on a a scale incomparable to any other society”.
    Not even the former Soviet Union’s navy presented a challenge as daunting to the United States that China does. There’s no comparison, or precedent.

    • @alexalbrecht5768
      @alexalbrecht5768 4 місяці тому

      That would be implying the Soviet Navy was actually a threat at some point. The actual threat came from the hundreds of Tu-22M bombers built towards the end of the Cold War. Soviet doctrine would throw 100 of them at a single carrier group.

    • @xiaousqqq
      @xiaousqqq 2 місяці тому

      中国一年下水一个法国海军。呵呵,你知道么?我们离第一已经不远了。

  • @IrishCarney
    @IrishCarney 6 місяців тому +58

    It's a cruiser. It has facilities for a commodore or admiral and his staff to command a task force.

    • @amunra5330
      @amunra5330 6 місяців тому +23

      Yup. It’s pretty much a Cruiser. I hope once the entire line of these ships are built (16 in total) the PLAN will reclassify them as Cruisers. I think they classify them as destroyers now because they dont want to scare Western imperialists 😂

    • @jacobbaumgardner3406
      @jacobbaumgardner3406 6 місяців тому +29

      ⁠@@amunra5330no, it’s because cruiser isn’t a classification in their system, just like how many European countries don’t have destroyers in theirs. Everything is a frigate.

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 6 місяців тому +15

      what about those japanese helicopter 'destroyers' that can fly F35B??

    • @Bangy
      @Bangy 6 місяців тому +5

      It's a destroyer, not a cruiser, in the same way that China is a developing economy, not a developed one.

    • @kapitankapital6580
      @kapitankapital6580 6 місяців тому +16

      Well that's how NATO classifies them, although it's not really that simple. The Chinese don't really use the Type 055 for the sorts of C&C roles that define a cruiser in the NATO classification, and it's development is much more a continuation of the Type 052 series of destroyers rather than a fundamentally different warship (compared to, say, the Ticonderoga and Arleigh Burke). The PLAN has never really had cruisers and they don't have much need for the classification, whereas it is very convenient for the Americans to call it a cruiser because it makes the PLAN sound much more threatening and thus justifies more spending. In particular it is an effort to revive the cancelled CG(X) project.
      It is worth noting that the CG(X) project was cancelled because they decided the task could be completed by the DDG(X) instead. So even in the United States, pretty much the last holdout of the antiquated "cruiser" term, the ship type is being phased out. The reality is that there aren't going to be any cruisers (except for maybe a couple of relics) in a decade or two.

  • @thehumus8688
    @thehumus8688 6 місяців тому +111

    Renhai class is one of the sexiest modern warship

    • @liaojohnweechun7454
      @liaojohnweechun7454 6 місяців тому +7

      JIAYOU CHUNG GUO 👌🇨🇳✊🇨🇳🥰💚

    • @runze5363
      @runze5363 6 місяців тому

      Which language you use here?????????​@@liaojohnweechun7454

    • @fhetfet6402
      @fhetfet6402 6 місяців тому

      yup, it belongs to the brothel...lmao

    • @shichaosun3298
      @shichaosun3298 3 місяці тому

      Nanchang class

    • @runze5363
      @runze5363 3 місяці тому

      @@liaojohnweechun7454 chung guo??zhōng guó!!

  • @jollygreen4662
    @jollygreen4662 6 місяців тому +41

    Looks like PLA.N beds have better sleeping clearance than USB beds.

    • @fhetfet6402
      @fhetfet6402 6 місяців тому +1

      before you speak, check your iq.

    • @AmirShafeek
      @AmirShafeek 6 місяців тому

      Classic American when somebody says something you don't agree with you attack their character or something about them
      ​@@fhetfet6402

    • @bigbigmurphy
      @bigbigmurphy 5 місяців тому

      It's possible to have spacious living quarters if it was implemented into the design, Zumwalt has similar design/layout as well. I think the ones shown in this videos are SNCO or JO quarters.

  • @Thinkofwhat
    @Thinkofwhat 6 місяців тому +28

    What a beauty:)

  • @kanding3369
    @kanding3369 4 місяці тому +6

    The deck is cleaner than my bedroom

  • @GeoPoliticsCommentry
    @GeoPoliticsCommentry 6 місяців тому +30

    Yes Window's are bad for stealth

  • @jeanhuynh8548
    @jeanhuynh8548 6 місяців тому +40

    Beautiful ship and deadly!

  • @seductive_fishstick8961
    @seductive_fishstick8961 6 місяців тому +19

    Easily my favorite modern destroyer

  • @RKZX2
    @RKZX2 6 місяців тому +29

    What a great looking boat.

    • @samtat5873
      @samtat5873 6 місяців тому +2

      It's warship not boat my friend

  • @bigbigmurphy
    @bigbigmurphy 5 місяців тому +6

    A rare look into these ships. Just to keep things into perspective, most Navy uses lead based paint, due to their anti corrosion property while the US Navy is mandated to not use lead based paint, thus, over time, you see rust spots all over the ship. I have toured multiple nation's ships, I have to say the Chinese, Japanese, Korean have one of the most clean interior. My question is, what does the chow looks like, and more importantly, do they have beer?

    • @rocket870
      @rocket870 2 місяці тому

      China has many beers but on a Naval ship? I am not sure, but I do know Chinese sailors love their beer

    • @lixzx007
      @lixzx007 Місяць тому

      not allowed ​@@rocket870

    • @daitudai
      @daitudai Місяць тому

      Alcohol is strictly forbidden in the Chinese army, not even beer.

    • @ivanborgia3384
      @ivanborgia3384 22 дні тому

      The Chinese military used to allow alcohol consumption during banquets(in PLA it's called Huican aka 会餐 in Chinese), but all alcoholic drinks have been banned after the reform.

    • @ivanborgia3384
      @ivanborgia3384 22 дні тому

      As for food, the food served on Chinese warships is mostly of a Chinese cuisine style, therefore the cooking equipment on the ship is also quite different from that of Western warships.

  • @hughmungus2760
    @hughmungus2760 6 місяців тому +22

    wow, so 2 new type 055s are under construction and nobody is reporting it, Its really gotten to that stage where these things are becoming mundane huh?

    • @今晚打老虎-f3g
      @今晚打老虎-f3g 6 місяців тому +6

      因为还有两艘航母正在建造中,所以055热度少一点😂现在的热度在:这两艘正在建造的航母到底是不是核动力航母

    • @cong4085
      @cong4085 5 місяців тому +2

      今天第 10 艘已经下水了

    • @㯥多多
      @㯥多多 3 місяці тому

      ​@@cong4085第14艘下水了🎉

    • @hgg-bw2jp
      @hgg-bw2jp 3 місяці тому

      ​@user-少吹牛啊,是第10艘wl4mz6gs9b

    • @㯥多多
      @㯥多多 3 місяці тому

      @@hgg-bw2jp 啊对对对,你说的都对。 你就继续自我麻痹吧

  • @justme6275
    @justme6275 6 місяців тому +21

    nice ship!

  • @republicspaceagency9141
    @republicspaceagency9141 6 місяців тому +23

    Much apricieted the video ❤

  • @trungnguyen-vc8kc
    @trungnguyen-vc8kc 6 місяців тому +7

    Thank’s sharing about the type 055 Destroyer.

  • @АндрейМ-ф5н
    @АндрейМ-ф5н 6 місяців тому +18

    055🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍

  • @stevenryle5709
    @stevenryle5709 6 місяців тому +30

    What combat ship has windows? You want windows go on a cruise ship

    • @johnsmith1953x
      @johnsmith1953x 6 місяців тому +2

      Polish submarines?

    • @caliman8006
      @caliman8006 5 місяців тому

      Old Chinese combat ships have windows for...snippers.

    • @崔莱
      @崔莱 5 місяців тому

      @@caliman8006 you mean machine guns? I doubt they would even *have* sniper rifles on the ship?

  • @douginorlando6260
    @douginorlando6260 6 місяців тому +5

    I expect most ships to end up with close in defense systems to protect against large swarms of small jet powered drones. Look at the video of an amateur radio controlled small aircraft (about 5 Kg) going 737 km/hr.

  • @honfmeilingfleet957
    @honfmeilingfleet957 4 місяці тому +4

    Type 055 is deadly i did try it in Modern Warships

  • @mohdsaufi283
    @mohdsaufi283 5 місяців тому +7

    Beautiful ship.slender shape.

  • @raytheron
    @raytheron 5 місяців тому +3

    A beautiful ship. Most modern warships are ugly, but the 055s are sleek and beautiful. The voiceover sounds like a Kiwi Officer Crabtree! (If you don't know who that is, Google 'Allo 'Allo)

  • @Laizi_ybo
    @Laizi_ybo 5 місяців тому +4

    中国在军工设备领域的战略是服役一代,研制一代,预研一代,探索一代。当一个武器我们愿意拿出来给你看的时候,意味着我们的下一代武器已经攻克了绝大部分难题,甚至可以试产了。

  • @Jiaqi-p5b
    @Jiaqi-p5b 6 місяців тому +15

    It is my belief that the new batch of 055 will have upgraded CIC

  • @mattross83
    @mattross83 3 місяці тому +1

    That is one good looking ship. We’ll get to see how she goes at war no doubt before 2030.

  • @global_southerner
    @global_southerner 6 місяців тому +17

    The sea dragon!

  • @DannyChean
    @DannyChean 4 місяці тому +3

    "There are no windows in the guest rooms?" "This isn't a freaking cruise ship you know."

  • @Rob-rr4yp
    @Rob-rr4yp 6 місяців тому +5

    My guy just about jumped out of his shirt when the gun first fired

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 5 місяців тому +3

    Realy I like this powerful destroyer

  • @samuelstanley1464
    @samuelstanley1464 6 місяців тому +20

    I'd love to see your analysis on the British type 45 destroyer and how it compares to the 055. ❤ and thanks again for your incredible content

    • @chester1234ification
      @chester1234ification 6 місяців тому

      T 45 is slightly more advanced.

    • @shengzhong2662
      @shengzhong2662 6 місяців тому +1

      对对对 你说的都对@@chester1234ification

    • @etow8034
      @etow8034 6 місяців тому +1

      All sunk in a simulation by the Type 055 and Type 052D ! ...LoL
      ua-cam.com/video/BhXqX6viwkM/v-deo.html

    • @Jiaqi-p5b
      @Jiaqi-p5b 6 місяців тому +35

      @@chester1234ificationI’ll have to disagree. In general I think the 055 is about a class higher than the 45 in almost all areas except for CIC. In terms of radar capabilities, the variety of lethal weaponry in the vls, the amount of power it generates, and it’s electronic warfare capabilities, in other words in every aspect that makes a modern warship dangerous, the 055 has a significant edge over the 45.

    • @Jiaqi-p5b
      @Jiaqi-p5b 6 місяців тому +15

      @@chester1234ificationI personally think the newest batch of 052DG destroyers is a more equal match for the 45.

  • @martinjanecek4950
    @martinjanecek4950 6 місяців тому +6

    awesome video

  • @minhmeo9506
    @minhmeo9506 6 місяців тому +22

    A mini Kirov class, but sleeker, stealthier and deadlier 😬

    • @hjhghj462
      @hjhghj462 6 місяців тому +2

      Outperforms kirov class in all aspects

    • @cambrian9438
      @cambrian9438 5 місяців тому

      基洛夫是五十年前的老古董,它不属于这个时代

  • @TheCrapOnYourStrapOn
    @TheCrapOnYourStrapOn 6 днів тому

    The Chinese New Zealand accent is top notch.
    Edit I wanted to add that I pee in the sink secretly.

  • @Anafiisyyds
    @Anafiisyyds 3 місяці тому +1

    2 aircraft carriers and 7 055-million-ton destroyers in 10 years,how can do it?

  • @musa7010
    @musa7010 12 днів тому

    Some guys are delusiona here saying it will be sunk in 5 mins or it's a copy. The Russian and Chinese ships have hyper sonic missiles and AESA radars combination which many other navies can only envy 😮

  • @gelinrefira
    @gelinrefira 6 місяців тому +11

    Well, if the ships are trying to sink each other in gun range, then things must have gone very very wrong.

    • @Jiaqi-p5b
      @Jiaqi-p5b 6 місяців тому +7

      Yes, I think the 130mm gun is there for fire support on land targets after the PLA achieve air&sea superiority. I saw some posts say it can provide the same fire power as a artillery battalion.

    • @xsu-is7vq
      @xsu-is7vq 6 місяців тому +5

      Don’t be surprised that ships were in visual range when hostilities break out.

    • @hjhghj462
      @hjhghj462 6 місяців тому +5

      This ship is stealth........for thousands of years, traditional Chinese combat techniques have been based on large army models, now they have leading global technology.
      but don’t forget that the PLA is the world’s largest and most powerful guerrilla group with outstanding records.

    • @乐无
      @乐无 6 місяців тому +1

      YJ21 has a range of more than 2,000 kilometers, and can break through the black barrier and change the orbit of supersonic flight communication.

    • @ivanborgia3384
      @ivanborgia3384 22 дні тому

      That‘s nearly impossible nowadays…

  • @rickace132
    @rickace132 15 днів тому +1

    4:09 Dat wrench doe.

  • @prastagus3
    @prastagus3 6 місяців тому +6

    they may make a variant of 055 that uses experimental rail gun as the main cannon

    • @weirankezhi
      @weirankezhi 5 місяців тому +2

      早有消息了,已有的055a主炮是双路供弹,今年下海的055b主炮要用电磁炮,整个船要用全点

    • @妙才-z6g
      @妙才-z6g 4 місяці тому +3

      According to domestic media reports, research and development began in 2023. The model seems to be called 055A, with a displacement of over 15000 tons, and the weapon appears to be an electromagnetic cannon. I'm not sure

  • @biyangyu4192
    @biyangyu4192 3 місяці тому +1

    What a great looking huge wrench

  • @DTWesker
    @DTWesker 2 місяці тому

    People used to believe in aircraft carrier because there wasn't hyper sonic missile back then.

  • @truefaith4200
    @truefaith4200 6 місяців тому +4

    Excellent 👍

  • @EthanX1ao
    @EthanX1ao 5 місяців тому +5

    16艘055是最基础的,只够分给未来各个航母战斗群,如果还要给驱支塞055的话那二十多艘055也不是不可能

  • @krislim1130
    @krislim1130 4 місяці тому +1

    The sailors mostly look very young.
    I spy a Schneider circuit breaker and Fluke multimeter.

    • @xiaousqqq
      @xiaousqqq 2 місяці тому

      😓这都被你发现了?呵呵,福禄克不错,就是太贵了。

  • @Pin0fPoints
    @Pin0fPoints 4 місяці тому

    Why is the ship majestic

  • @weirankezhi
    @weirankezhi 5 місяців тому +6

    我更期待今年下海的055b,因为它将装备史无前例的电磁炮

  • @Azathoth2980
    @Azathoth2980 2 місяці тому

    Navy went from tricycle to Countach in a quarter of century

  • @112313
    @112313 6 місяців тому +2

    Question: a time zone crossing vessel.....what time zone do they keep?

    • @崔莱
      @崔莱 5 місяців тому +1

      China spans 3 timezones in geography but uses only one timezone for everything, so if I had to guess, I'd say it uses the same standard timezone

  • @Galileo1491
    @Galileo1491 6 місяців тому +4

    A masterpiece of the proletariat

  • @thetreekeeper143
    @thetreekeeper143 6 місяців тому +9

    What an anti-imperial beauty!! 👍

  • @mdmotaled3318
    @mdmotaled3318 4 місяці тому +1

    Chinese super destroyer very strong

  • @PROLIFIC_TRAVELS
    @PROLIFIC_TRAVELS 6 місяців тому +1

    All of these countries destroyer's have the exact same weapons 😂

  • @ankitkawale9748
    @ankitkawale9748 6 місяців тому +1

    Hey can u do whole Russian Navy, with its distribution in black sea and others.
    And how many damaged and destroyed black sea fleet is in this war with loss of its combat capabilities (based on parameters like missiles, tonnage, etc)

  • @theredbar-cross8515
    @theredbar-cross8515 6 місяців тому +2

    What do you think about the new Binkov video about the upcoming PrSM2 on HIMARS for Taiwan? Do you agree with his assessment that only the HHQ9 missiles have a realistic chance of intercepting these intermediate range ballistic missiles?

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  6 місяців тому +7

      Interesting question. I've done some reading on Chinese assessment of the HIMAR and how they plan to counter it. Seems like a good video topic, so I'll address this in a video if that's OK

    • @theredbar-cross8515
      @theredbar-cross8515 6 місяців тому +1

      @@EurasiaNaval I look forward to it.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 6 місяців тому +5

      apparently the PRSM is going to be a non-hypersonic, non-stealth antiship ballistic missile which basically means its going to be fairly easy to shoot down. Its only saving grace would be that it can be fired in large volleys, but somehow I doubt the US can afford to lob large volleys of them at chinese warships over and over.

    • @theredbar-cross8515
      @theredbar-cross8515 6 місяців тому +4

      @@hughmungus2760 All ballistic missiles reach hypersonic velocities in the terminal phase, it's called gravity.
      The question is whether or not they are maneuverable in this phase.
      I have no doubt that Chinese hypersonic missiles in service today are superior to the PrSM 1 in every way, but the game is not one of hypersonic missiles fighting outer hypersonic missiles.
      American PrSMs could be just as devastating to Chinese ships as DF-17s are to American ships. The Americans would just need to fire more of them, which is fine, since they're cheaper.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 6 місяців тому +3

      @@theredbar-cross8515 depends, some shorter range ballistic missiles don't actually reach mach 5.
      it can maybe be compared with the DF21d, except it doesn't have 1500km of range which is what makes it really effective.
      Also the PRSM has a warhead of under 100kg, whereas a chinese df21d has a warhead of well over 500kg
      The DF17 is in a completely different league as the PRSM, its a hypersonic glider which means it spends the majority of its flight in an aerodynamic profile and can perform evasive manoeuvres that make it extremely difficult to intercept at range.

  • @ramatgan1
    @ramatgan1 3 місяці тому

    It will be even more formidble once they install the naval-based mid-course interceptors, such as the HQ-19 anti-ballistic missiles.
    Watching from Somalia.

    • @xiaousqqq
      @xiaousqqq 2 місяці тому

      那你说我们是装了呢?还是没装?呵呵,你猜。

  • @paulantony4598
    @paulantony4598 3 місяці тому +1

    American, Indian etc. wannabe admirals - 'bah, that's just some made in china rubbish ship, it'll sink tomorrow..blah blah..'
    😂🙄

  • @jacobrocks7
    @jacobrocks7 5 місяців тому

    The quarters are nicer than my NYC studio

  • @josephsumog-oy8503
    @josephsumog-oy8503 5 місяців тому +1

    China the largest navy in earth

  • @dominadoralegado1121
    @dominadoralegado1121 4 місяці тому +1

    WOW china biggest super power Cannon.

  • @flyop312
    @flyop312 2 місяці тому

    it will be at the bottom of the sea within 5 minutes of being sited

  • @allenz2922
    @allenz2922 5 місяців тому +1

    Can a Type 055 inflict severe damage on a carrier strike group if it strikes first?

    • @Spooky_918
      @Spooky_918 5 місяців тому +1

      A single one no, the YJ21s it uses are good but rather inaccurate for modern missiles, adding to that with the us testing there new SM missiles it will even further decrease the chance of a hit meaning a full strike group would be able to out launch a single type55. Best way for such a attack to succeed would be by having multiple plus type 052s to provide additional threats

    • @lspcnb3747
      @lspcnb3747 5 місяців тому

      如果卫星制导精度足够,理论上是可行的

    • @Spooky_918
      @Spooky_918 5 місяців тому +1

      @@lspcnb3747 是的,我承认它非常令人印象深刻,如果它有效,它将几乎势不可挡,但以那些针对计算机的速度还无法工作

    • @johnwang8192
      @johnwang8192 4 місяці тому

      @@Spooky_918 YJ21的打击距离远,多打几轮是完全有可能的,055的作战半径在1500公里

    • @Farzan4741
      @Farzan4741 4 місяці тому

      u donno thay one of this destroyer kept US 7th fleet at bay for 20 days. Locking its VLS. USS carl vinson was there. only one of this destroyer back in jan this year. please find out the story. its really powerful. one of this can handle entire carrier battle group​@@Spooky_918

  • @erdiakarsu4945
    @erdiakarsu4945 6 місяців тому +2

    Moar naval content please, about indian, iranian and arab countries, it is fine if superficial, info is info please, please. They are also players in the game.

    • @pike100
      @pike100 6 місяців тому

      *more, not moar

  • @totzinfo
    @totzinfo 4 місяці тому

    China currently the largest naval fleet in the world, as of now they only have 3 aircraft carriers but 10x more warships and naval aircrafts than U.S.

    • @daCoda23
      @daCoda23 3 місяці тому

      but ZERO experience in naval warfare

    • @xiaousqqq
      @xiaousqqq 2 місяці тому

      @@daCoda23 对,你说的对。打一仗就不是零了。呵呵

    • @xiaousqqq
      @xiaousqqq 2 місяці тому

      别瞎说,根本没有,我们还有很长的路要走。

    • @daCoda23
      @daCoda23 2 місяці тому

      @@xiaousqqq yes hehe. We can learn from experience, whether lose or win.

    • @xiaousqqq
      @xiaousqqq 2 місяці тому

      @@daCoda23 好好学习天天向上

  • @chdv5736
    @chdv5736 4 місяці тому +1

    That looks absolutely beautiful

  • @FahrurRoziqin
    @FahrurRoziqin 6 місяців тому +7

    and People saying China still isn't public

    • @christophervaughan2637
      @christophervaughan2637 6 місяців тому +3

      Who is saying their propaganda isn’t public? 😂

    • @erwinlee2842
      @erwinlee2842 6 місяців тому +18

      ​@@christophervaughan2637 yes as public as USA propagandas

    • @georgewong6615
      @georgewong6615 6 місяців тому

      @@christophervaughan2637 you

    • @christophervaughan2637
      @christophervaughan2637 6 місяців тому

      @@erwinlee2842 yes both sides are creating propaganda so please don’t speak as if China is better than anyone else

    • @Wvk5zc
      @Wvk5zc 6 місяців тому

      @@christophervaughan2637 China isnt worse than US, so sod off

  • @regiaohu299
    @regiaohu299 Місяць тому

    老哥辛苦了,下次要不试试ai配音?

  • @johnfrancis2215
    @johnfrancis2215 6 місяців тому

    Wonder if it breaks down regularly and the missiles plunge into the sea like our British ships and subs 🤣🤣🤣

    • @MelThorburn
      @MelThorburn 6 місяців тому +3

      I doubt it! China now reminds me of that scene from “Back to the future” when Doc in the 50s was blaming problems with the DeLorean on “Japanese microchips” until 80s Marty put him right. China has now caught and surpassed everybody now. I think they will have a “game changing” military technology soon , I hear rumours of plasma stealth 😉

  • @gtempo4673
    @gtempo4673 5 місяців тому

    i swear that you are a kiwi..... awesome videos mate with excellent coverage. Chur!

    • @cariopuppetmaster
      @cariopuppetmaster 4 місяці тому +1

      I think he mentioned he is taiwnese

    • @gtempo4673
      @gtempo4673 4 місяці тому

      @cariopuppetmaster yeh I have no doubt but he definitely has a bit of a "twang" to his accent and I suspect it's kiwi. Regardless awesome content.

    • @paulantony4598
      @paulantony4598 3 місяці тому

      ​@@gtempo4673 he's a Taiwanese American...

    • @gtempo4673
      @gtempo4673 3 місяці тому

      @paulantony4598 true that but his English has soo many kiwi signatures in it, I wonder if he has been hanging around kiwis. Regardless top notch dude. Top notch content.

  • @UpShiftTypeR
    @UpShiftTypeR 6 місяців тому +2

    USN's nightmare at the seas....

    • @daCoda23
      @daCoda23 3 місяці тому

      China has ZERO experience in naval warfare

  • @students_-_life
    @students_-_life 2 місяці тому

    Wow a shell can't even blast a plastic ball 😂

  • @traumajock
    @traumajock 4 місяці тому

    They have actual working CLOCKS?!!

  • @tonywei423
    @tonywei423 6 місяців тому

    The BMD will be add on to it.

  • @Pilipinoako763
    @Pilipinoako763 4 місяці тому

    THAT WILL BECOME A BEAUTIFUL REEF IN A WPS....

  • @KaiDidumaNx
    @KaiDidumaNx 4 місяці тому

    The only question to answer is how much tofu dreng is used making this ship...

    • @xiaousqqq
      @xiaousqqq 2 місяці тому

      很多很多。你是绿蛙么?癞蛤蟆让你来的?哈哈

  • @versatrade1
    @versatrade1 4 місяці тому +1

    omg! What a destroyer! Can it be par with US' s Zumwalt or...

    • @Pin0fPoints
      @Pin0fPoints 4 місяці тому +1

      Zumwalt has more tonnage, but is unreliable and very expensive

    • @paulantony4598
      @paulantony4598 3 місяці тому +1

      Zumwalt doesn't know what it has to be..

  • @Peizxcv
    @Peizxcv 6 місяців тому +2

    Don’t like the 12-hours clock and that sailor using his phone, hopefully that phone’s signal is routed through multiple VPN and cannot transmit location

    • @spudz7405
      @spudz7405 6 місяців тому

      It's a cell phone unless it's on airplane mode it going to give off some signal

    • @moss550
      @moss550 6 місяців тому +5

      It's probably not a cell phone but the ship's internal personal terminal, like a PDA in the old days.
      A previous tour of one of the carrier had a shown such device.

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  6 місяців тому +2

      Engineer Tang Chao was just scrolling through the video clips already stored on his phone. There's no indication he was using the internet or sending/receiving data.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 6 місяців тому

      @@EurasiaNaval it is possible that sailors are given PLA issue phones for personal use that don't have any OPSEC risk.

  • @parrotbrand2782
    @parrotbrand2782 3 місяці тому

    It is kinda big for a frigate. More like a cruiser.

  • @The-best-Andy
    @The-best-Andy 5 місяців тому +2

    你们看到的055其实是我们中国的渔船,未来会配备给海警😂

  • @Lyk1986
    @Lyk1986 5 місяців тому +2

    别担心,迟早会变成万吨海警船的😊

    • @陈佳鲁
      @陈佳鲁 2 місяці тому

      我看评论,这群外国狗嫉妒的要死😂

  • @romeonesperos4293
    @romeonesperos4293 5 місяців тому

    A giant like Goliath, means empty

  • @wst8340
    @wst8340 2 місяці тому

    Wow!😮

  • @yaowanangsa
    @yaowanangsa 2 місяці тому

    yeah, a paper ship, nothing to worry

  • @TellenJones
    @TellenJones 6 місяців тому +3

    Its current engines are kinda outdated. China is working on the next generation of better engines that might be adopted by 055 B / C models.

    • @qiyuxuan9437
      @qiyuxuan9437 6 місяців тому +1

      Well, its not outdated, just no longer the state of the art, and 055 has a lots of redundant engine power, which can be used to power rail gun or laser weapons in the future upgrade.

    • @iantimothy693
      @iantimothy693 6 місяців тому

      They're just confused and can't make up their mind what to copy.

    • @TellenJones
      @TellenJones 6 місяців тому +6

      @@iantimothy693 It seems US navy instead is trying to copy 055 in their next gen battleship design which will only take 30 yrs to finish. 😁

  • @ericchang-ek2ee
    @ericchang-ek2ee 6 місяців тому +1

    上次看到這廣告時,就建議不要用通用扳手,要專用的。

    • @DULENSHK
      @DULENSHK 6 місяців тому

      通用在於彈性 應變 ,專用除B格 還有什麼優勢?

  • @七情六欲-b5l
    @七情六欲-b5l 4 місяці тому

    同志们不必惊慌,就是一艘小渔船。爱来着东方