The Battlefield vs Call of Duty War
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 лип 2024
- Which is Better, Call of Duty or Battlefield? So, we discuss the Battlefield vs Call of Duty Battle! Covering the History of Battlefield and Story of Call of Duty, the Single Player vs Multiplayer experience, Battle Royale, Gunplay, Customization, Immersion, Cheating, Hacking, Toxic Lobbies and the Future. Timestamps in Description!
Game Clips include Battlefield 2042 Hazard Zone, Battlefield 2042 Exodus, Call of Duty Vanguard, Call of Duty Warzone, Call of Duty Modern Warfare, Battlefield V, Battlefield 1, Battlefield 4, Battlefield 1942.
✅ Subscribe here: bit.ly/3y5nfgo
✔️ Member Perks! bit.ly/3AprvZo
▶ The History of Gaming: bit.ly/2XD6e0m
▶ Other Great Videos: bit.ly/3yYgH4k
💌 Discord: / discord
📺 Twitch: / diehard
🐥 Twitter: / diehardgg
Chapters:
0:00 Battlefield vs Call of Duty
2:01 The Success
2:52 Single Player
4:33 Multiplayer
6:08 The Debate
7:11 Teamwork
8:11 Gunplay
9:03 Customization
9:36 Immersion
#battlefield2042 #callofduty #battlefield
------------------------------------------------
For business inquiries, please email me at:
diehardassassinbiz@gmail.com - Ігри
*Subscribe for more Doritos Dust*
▶ The History of Gaming: bit.ly/2XD6e0m
Well made video xd
kevin
Does anybody remember metal of honor was a great game I still remember the day I got to fire a starter achievement not many people have that
Battlefield Series Better ! Beacuse DICE is Community Family ! R-Evolotion !
Call Of Duty Series Beguns , Power Rising Up, and after 2012 , Early 2013 Everything going to be fall down !
As someone who has been playing both games for a long time, let me tell you something.
It's unfair to compare the 2, Call of duty is more CQB focused, fast paced small battles gameplay.
While battlefield focused on more larger battles with a lot of vehicles.
Sometimes, you need a bit of both
So what we should be compare it? Is both shooter games of course it should be compare on its core engine and gameplay that both offers to us. For sure, both offers different things but it also plausible to compare 2 like Call of Duty has not destruction but it is very good optimized meanwhile Battlefield has it but very bad optimized it if you compare to cod. Hit reg and netcode are the biggest problems in BF, while in Cod the biggest problem was always how they balance the gameplay core.
I say this as someone who also play them both
@@aveteranplayer6403 tbh, bf also has its balance flaws
@@LynxErgo Yes, it has. But I think is less than cod
@@aveteranplayer6403 stfu bf fanboy. Cod is better
Other games: *removes funny tactics*
Battlefield portal: *EMBRACE THE MEME*
(Btw i like both I like battlefield for the gameplay and multiplayer and I like cod for the stories)
thats the only reason im going to buy it
Imagine if battlefield had price and ghost. 😳 we would be blessed if bf had the cod campaigns.
I like halo for both story and multiplayer. Man I’m real hype for battlefield 2042 and Halo infinite !! Cod…….not so much we’ll see tho
xd
@@CD-R828 Crossover?
Major takeaway: You CAN like both games
Thats me lol 😂
@@Aces_of_Chaos I like both franchises, but Cold War is straight dog shit
Redditors: Impossible
Nah man, peace ain't fun with these type of games
No you can't, i try to be neutral before but now COD dev fault is really unforgiveable now
Tbh I feel like Cod makes you feel like you're watching an action movie Battlefield makes you feel like a soldier in a war film
I think battlefield 1 is the most cinematic game ever
Not really, Battlefield 4 felt like an action film. It’s more realistic, but realism isn’t always better when it comes to storytelling, but works in MP.
@@jordanwebster1728 not to mention 1
Cod ww2 campaign litterally had the most realistic cutscenes I had ever seen. The cutscence in hill 493 mission litterally looked like real life, just watch a video of it, if you haven`t seen.
@@Zentrix588 RDR2 looks the best in my eyes but I know that’s not really comparable to a COD game
I've tried getting into COD but Battlefield is just too good. Nothing can beat how immersive it feels.
Same
@Big Smoke215 ok go enjoy ur half broken cold war with op guns and prob one of the worst games ever
@Big Smoke215 u really think that just look at comparison videos on the detail, also I'm not playing a game in which the majority of it's streamers quit cause it was that bad
@Big Smoke215 you mean the game that copied bf4
@Big Smoke215 Both are way below average games
I had never even heard of battlefield until the release of battlefield 3, I finally decided to give Battlefield 3 a shot around the time MW3 released, note that up to that point I had played every call of duty between big red one and MW3. There was a lot of clash between bf3 and mw3 back then so that publicity is what made me aware of BF3. Anyway the battlefield 3 campaign blew me away, of course we all know the two missions I'm talking about, but also some of the infantry moments were sick too like when the Russian troops are paradropping in and you charge the Frontline as bullets start to whiz by. The multi-player had a bit of a learning curve for me, but once I finally adjusted I became a full battlefield convert.
then, bfv happened
@@bluebrawler3558 actually me and my friends enjoy bf5 that was my first battlefield game and I loved it , new maps that were added to the game were soo fun , I don't think that game is that bad
I started with BF2 in 2005, played for a solid 3 years nothing but, it was absolutely groundbreaking at the time with 64 player lobbies and massive large scale battles, jet fights, chopper whoring, you name it, graphics were insane as well, especially for the time, this is PC not console fyi, battlerecorder NEEEDS to come back! Oh the skits were legendary, the DICE we know today were the original team behind desert combat for the very first game, they made such an amazing mod they were hired to make battlefield 2, and thus, DiCE was born
@@virenkeswani that's probably because you've never played battlefield 3.
@@passiondono4692 yea bf5 was my first bf game i mainly got into gaming in 2018 and my dad didnt buy any games for me until recently so never played previous games but i do own bf3 serves have really high ping for me so dont play it much
I used to love COD but over the years i've started to enjoy games more like BF. I tried getting Cold War but i couldn't stand the MP, when wrecking a team as a sniper they all of a sudden spawn right behind me. That frustrated me so much.
Yea spawn flip it’s to stop you from spawn trapping
Maybe don't camp too much! Haha just kidding..
@@dracomessup D:
you should play call of duty mobile you won't like the graphics that much but its free and has some good gamemodes you can try if you want new things but still having the call of duty vibe.
@@johncarlocagaoan6252 I've played it, I don't mind it but it's a mobile game, so only good to play super casually when on the go.
I'm a COD gamer at heart. There's nothing like snapping on your opponents for the big kill streaks. But with that said there is nothing like squading up with your friends and taking objectives with epic team work on BF. Plus playing with a commander on BF that takes FPS to the next level.
You should try squad lol
He speaks the truth
I hope the squad and general ally cooperation with class system gets back on BF2042 before it's too late.
For me I have been leaning more towards Battlefield for multiplayer, and COD for the campaign and zombies. As was said in this video, Battlefield is focused more on squad gameplay, so playing with friends and trying to do dumb stuff and have fun is easier in Battlefield than COD. There is also the problem COD has with Meta weapons and strats. In Battlefield, if there is a godly sniper stopping you from moving forward, or a guy set up with a tank or something, you just get in a vehicle to get past them or swap up your strategy and loadout to take them out. In COD it just seems that with how some people just seem to know every in and out of the maps and guns, there is almost no counter to how some people play.
Very well said
The one problem that completely prevents me from ever enjoying BF is that there are tons of empty/high ping server which means i can never play properly. And when i finally get to play in a decent server, i instantly get wrecked by cheaters with chinese usernames every single goddamn time
@@vivosmartphone2280 damn u didn't switch to western serves huh?
@@edo-san i wish i could, but the pings are even higher than snoop dog, so no bueno
@@vivosmartphone2280 with what you play bf console or PC because I never encounter cheater while playing in console
Cod has best story
Bf has best multiplayer
Thats very fucking debatable
Cod is better for cqb and battlefield is where you walk around for ten years then die
@@slazy824 you know conquest isn't the only mode?
@@slazy824 yeah battlefield is so damn boring
@@BigBoiNiro because you’re a noob at it
Cod campaigns are so good "what's the number Mason!" "What the hell kind of name is Soap"
Do not trust Shepherd I repeat do not trust Shepherd
“Train go boom”
Bell we have a job to do
"I am a goddamn onion mason"
Press f to pay respects
You can tell Battlefield has passion behind it in the visuals/physics/traversal mechanics/ detailed reloads that resume where you left/ and tons of tiny details most games wouldn’t bother investing in
Until EA interfere
@@S8kjdh65 EA interfere by adding micro transmission
@@S8kjdh65 I'd agree with that kinda but you gotta admit mw19 set a bar that was too high for the cod franchise
“I need ammo”
“I need ammo”
“I need ammo” x100 plus knifing the supp
Teamwork at its finest
Dealing with building campers in COD: Infiltrate, stealth, come up from behind and take him out.
Dealing with building campers in Battlefield: Blow it the fuck up.
COD’s levolution really be a door opening comparing to Battlefields Shanghai skyscraper falling
Battlefield games stand out. There’s a reason there’s a huge community still playing 4, and 1, and even 3. While call of duty games it doesn’t matter as much as long as you’re playing the new one.
Cod is better for turning off your brain and doing an aim simulator. BF is better for everything else. Just takes slightly more commitment.
Highly disagree, In order to be good you have to be extremely committed, learning recoil patterns, finding good classes, certain movements, especially with the new gunsmith system that added ways to find what you like, make your weapon better at whatever you want. I just don't think that spending 2 hours getting kills at the back of a huge map is very fun
Cod players would all keep playing bo2 if hackers didn't destroy the game.
@@c4spur770 Highly disagree, to be good at cod all you need to do is know how to aim but with battlefield you need to learn recoil patterns, movement, map knowledge, how to destroy vehicles, finding the right class setup, how to use vehicles, how to work with your team and squad, etc. its a lot more complicated to be good in battlefield than cod . And your last statement "I just don't think that spending 2 hours getting kills at the back of a huge map is very fun" just proves my point, anyone with more than 2 brain cells will know that the action will always be at the objective areas where most of the team is so if you die then you can respawn on your squad and jump straight into the action again, but this is simple knowledge so obviously cod players don't understand this
@@Equinox6683 that's honestly the most ignorant thing ever, in no fps is the only thing you need to learn to aim, you clearly haven't touched a cod game so there is no point in arguing. Btw I have played every bf from bf3 on up. Maybe play a cod game for 15 minutes and I guarantee that you will have your ass handed to you back to back, because I'm cod, we have this brilliant thing called pushing and not sitting in the back sniping everyone with no deaths💀💀💀
Even if u do that in cod you are gonna get shit on bc there are too many people running around.
@@c4spur770 you sound like a cod sweat. When cod fails do not come back crying to battlefield and stay over at your trash cod.
This is by far my favorite video ever posted onto your channel, keep it up diehardGG!
Wow, thanks! Happy you liked it
@@diehardGG u did a lot of research for this and it eas also really fun to watch!
@@FunnyBloxYT YUSSS
@@diehardGG Its really good, also you by far my favorite youtuber
@@jyc_gaming2586 that's crazy! I'll have to keep pumpin out videos then
0:29 my Father's favourite game.
CoD: Everyone is the Main Character
Battlefield: Everyone is the Side Character
I still have ptsd from BF1 Devil's Anvil Operations campaing, Passchendaele, River Somme, Argonne Forrest and the start of the Kaiserschlacht campaing. And from BF3/4 the Operation Metro/Locker. These were one of the best times I had while playing videogames. I played COD only for the warmup for my reflexes and for the brokennes if that even is a word of the game
I still play on locker everyday. love it
Funny I’m playing on passchendale
You have PTSD?? I thought gaming was supposed to be fun and enjoyable
@@zh2266 With ptsd I mean that I have a lot of those adrenaline pumping moments on those maps that sometimes feel like ptsd
Does anyone remember the BF3 RPK glitch after the second update. They fix that glitch within a week lol or the Aug A3 with smoke rounds
Been playing Battlefield games for 18 years at this point. I never owned a Cod game myself but they have been casual fun at friends. Sometimes we have just 1v1d each other with the split screen. Fun memories. Both games can offer something fun which matter the most.
I started with COD4. Loved it so much. I was proud of clocking over 1 month playing time haha. Bought all the other modern warfares. My first battlefield experience came at BF4. A lot of bugs at the start and a whole new learning curve. Since that moment though I never went back. It just looks like a war with all the vehicles, chaos, destruction. BF1 was amazing after that too. BFV, was okay but didn't have an impact like BF4 and BF1. I'm super pumped for the next battlefield again. There's just something I find more fun about all the team work, destruction and vehicle use. Not that I'm taking shots at COD, I had a lot of fun with those in the past.
This whole thing is just giving me
Average Call of Duty and Battlefield Fan:🤡
Vs
Average Call of Duty and Battlefield Enjoyer:😎
Meme approved 😎👍
People who are fans of both:
I am ten parallel universes ahead of you
Facts
@@filmnationstudios389 i love battlefield for the weird stuff like launching tanks with c4 and cod for campaign and zombies
the reason i like battlefield more then cod is they give u the feeling that ur really in the battlefield and cod is just feeling like the same game every year
Every game is the same game, even Battlefield lmfao
CoD: *takes elements from BF*
BF: *takes elements from CoD*
Me: stop the debate, and release the ultimate fps game; Battle of Duty!
Call of field
battlefield with some of cod
If they do a crossover game, that's the only tactical fps I'm gonna buy
Yeah. CoD mw 2019 had a conquest rip off
@@CH-hn2rj you mean ground war it’s just regular MP just on a bigger map Cod WW2 had it to a rip off would be roblox game modes
Call Of Duty: Campaign/Story
Battlefield: Multiplayer
*case closed*
5:25 you had to hit us with the music!! my heart melted
how do ya not?!
This argument makes me feel like a dad, with two children. Telling them i love them both just same amount
2042 VS Vanguard, but does cod have portal?
Ah yes
Not likely
You can make any cod gamemode you like in bf portal. So if cod can't top that they should just pack their bags now lol
COD has a offline multiplayer. They had that since BO2, Battlefield does not have a offline multiplayer which I hope Portal has, be great, since Battlefront 2 has Instant Action from EA, I was hoping Battlefield 2042 will have it & the fact it will have progression while playing Portal is great, I hope Call Of Duty adds progression for offline multiplayer, they did with private match on zombies.
@@jedimorgan2042 Nope. COD always had a offline multiplayer for years, Battlefield is now doing it lmfao, how clever 🤣
Stop fighting!! They're both good!
As someone who grew up with cod and now gravitate more towards battlefield this video is a great representation of what makes each series great in their own ways without downplaying either franchise, great video lad!
CoD: We have a utterly massive battle royale map
Battlefield: yeah but that's one map, all my maps are that big if not bigger, not to mention the scale BF2042 will potentially have
Arma III: _sips from coffee mug_
Cold war and MW best parts were the campaigns. If i could just buy the campaign for
20 bones, i would be on board.
if thats ur fav campaign then play the other cod campaigns there even better
@@EvanGillmore11 Beaten them all.. COD 4 is right there with it. Cold war was creative and had such a great idea with the multiple endings.
I would buy bf3 and bad company for the the campaign alone at full price, bf3 being the best out of all
Man, bf3 had some amazing missions.
I’ve never played either but in the near future I’ll definitely get those two.
This was a great video. Well done!
Awesome video my dude!
Battlefield got the better sound track that's for sure
Facts
True
That’s debatable
Damned, Rooftops, Adrenaline , Cold war, piccadilly circus, anvil, mw theme, bell's theme, WaW Russian theme, black cats song, 115 would like to disagree
True
Zacharyi
One is fast food and one is a full course meal. #BF2042
Best way to describe both haha
The cadence and delivery of your voice over, the editing and stock footage used.. I could have sworn I was watching a gameranx video lol. Which for me atleast is a very good thing. Nicely done dude
Sounds like I'm improving! Thanks for this 👍
5:28 when that beat hits you know your in for a ride
During the hard times, I never switched up on COD
you dont know what youre missing... and i feel very sorry for you my guy
COD is still beasts
@@filmnationstudios389nah cod is a stupid Hollywood flashy ass game. Battlefield is realistic, authentic, accurate, and gritty.
@@DanielReckerBF4 Lmao. Nope
@@filmnationstudios389 yes it is. Look at battlefield 3 it's way more better than any modern warfare or call of duty game.
When it comes to campaigns, call of duty hands down.
When it comes to multiplayer, battlefield wins Everytime.
@@maxotto9877 yeah they won once lol to bad the devs abandoned the multiplayer
Great video man! Keep it up
Thanks! More on the way 👍
You deserve much more subscribers and i enjoy your videos so much :) keep the good work
Happy you're enjoying them!
two great series, Buying both this year for sure.
I would say you can’t really compare the two games, they are radically different from each other, and you can really enjoy both of them, and both of them are pretty good.
Vanguard vs 2042, finally a worthy opponent
War started again lads
vanguard looks shit
How dare you compare vanguard to any bf game?
Battlefield's gonna take everything this year unfortunately. Don't know why Activision thought it would be a good idea to make another ww2 game when MW was immensely succesful and the earlier ww2 game was meh.
@@nightwing268 dude do you want the next dozen COD games to be modern era? Thats gonna get boring. I need variety.
@@g0oblin_ have you seen gameplay?
This channel is very underrated for the quality of content being published on it.
So I am a diehard Battlefield fan. I started playing battlefield at the age of 10 with some friends of mine, We started with Battlefield bad company 2. Ever since then, I have gotten each battlefield game. This started with me disliking Call of Duty, as I adopted this loathing from the battlefield community. Call of Duty is a very good game. I have played COD WW2, with my buddies. I found the lack of community in Call of Duty surprising as usually in Battlefield, there is a sense of community among the players. This is why I think that Battlefield is better than Call of Duty. But, over the years I have come to see Call of Duty as a respectable game with it's own quirks and player base. Because of this I think that the conflict between these two masterpieces of Video games is pointless. But I think that both sides should accept each others as equals and just leave it at that.
I played both the games for long time.
In COD (Arcades) , our enjoyment is mostly from getting kills . In a long run of cod , that getting of kills more and more with camping or RNG makes the point of getting kills effectiveless ( which was our initial fun at the start of COD).
If we move to Arma or R6S (Stimulations), getting kills are damn hard . In that games , its fun to play them , but it causes an eagerness to get kills more .
But in case of Battlefield, its a semi arcade semi stimulation genre . A sweetspot between arcade( BF gunplay) and stimulation( BF gameplay) genres. Its not that hard to get kills like in Arma like games or its not that easy to get kills like in cod does . Thus Battlefield is a Neutral experience. It doesn't cause effectiveless or eagerness of getting kills . So , IMO, BF is a grand point of these two genres .
I dont think r6 is a simulaton
@@muzafferyaman4462 Mostly tends towards Simulation. Its gunplay is simulation , but gameplay tends to be arcade. But still harder to get kills . iam 150 rank in rss and still get killed by a recruit easily 😆
I really enjoyed this.
The video was as well made as the thumbnail, thank you. 👌
Thanks! 👍👍
I don’t care much for COD. I like BF cause there is vehicles, large maps and team based gameplay. COD is quick paced, small maps and you just run around going on a killing rampage. Plus BF has destruction too.
Uhhhhh ground war?
And Vanguard will have destruction as well
@@reaper0fmemes yeah ground war is the worse version of battlefields conquest tho
@@reaper0fmemes destroying doors chairs and furniture doesn’t compare to leveling a town, or bringing down a skyscraper
@@trevorpaar9954 true but
Bro how do you only have 35k subs when your vids are this good
The youtube algorithm can be tough
@@diehardGG you gonna be pretty big if you keep going at it good luck man and keep up the awesome content
Considering the fact that CoD Vanguard and Battlefield 2042 are coming out around the same time of year and with the era of both games switching I wonder witch game will be better gameplay wise
I loved both till Battlefield cut the single player campaign out. So this year only Call of Duty for me
Imagine playing Battlefield for the campaign unless if it Bad Company 3
Like, the return of the bot multiplayer gameplay since BF 2142 is the selling point
@@sooryan_1018 I play Battlefield because of the campaign. That’s why I got into Bad Company, the fact that Battlefield 2042 taking out the campaign is a failure, look how Singleplayer games dominate.
@@filmnationstudios389 well guess what, you play Battlefield for campaign is like playing GTA for realistic car driving. Just because you enjoyed GTA 4 for car physics doesn't mean all GTA will have it. And you called BF2042 a failure despite having tons of pre order means you are stupid dumb.
Also, you should have stopped buying Battlefield after Bad Company 2 if you were looking solely for the campaign
@@sooryan_1018 i agree.. that guy doesnt even know that the original battlefield game didnt even have a full story campaign..it only had famous battles which you could play offline...
I always love Cod for the campaign and multiplayer since Cod 2 but BF has great squad multiplayer gameplay especially BF4 and BF3 which makes it very good as well. I'm a big fan of both games.
God when i see all these clips in the background I love them both do much. I grew up with CoD 2 and have played every cod since. Cold war is actually the one i stopped at tho. But BF I also grew up with, but didn’t invest the same amount of time as i did in CoD. Back in the day it really depended on what type of warfare I wanted to play, and what mood I was in ofc. There is no winner for me, but I gotta say that Battlefield got me more hyped and I’ve been playing it very consistently since Battlefield 4/5. (Battlefield 5 is way too underrated). So yeah, they both had a great impact on my childhood. But storyline-wise CoD had the greatest way of telling it for me
When MZ was released, even with its problems, it was still a great game. The weapons you could choose from all fostered a unique style of gameplay you had to work with and play around. When CW came into the picture, that went away and for the most part, the stronger weapons all foster the same play style (more or less) which is the arcade shooter most of us have come to hate. Not only that, but raven/blizzard activision stopped caring for SUCH a great game. I'm hoping on the battlefield train for a LONG time after what raven/blizzard/activison did to their last game.
i liked warzone jus cause ground war and combined arms was trash wish they kept payload
honestly both headquarters should make a game together
I personally love both franchises and I’m someone who used to be a hardcore Battlefield Stan. They scratch different itches. I love the fast-paced multiplayer, story mode, and zombies mode in Call of Duty, but I also love the massive, all-out warfare of Battlefield, as well as its overall more grounded and realistic approach. I usually would stick to only Battlefield, as I try to only commit to one shooter game for a period of time, but I’ve found myself able to play enough of both games and still experience everything they have to offer and get to absurdly high ranks. It is slower to rank up and earn things in Battlefield, but it’s still possible to play both and enjoy both to the fullest. I particularly liked playing Call of Duty WW2 and Battlefield V at the same time because they offered different but crucial things from the same era (COD WW2 had well-known battles and the Russian front while BFV had lesser-known battles and the Pacific theater).
Good Video man I had fun... Bottom line : BF for Online experience COD : For mission in game
Every battlefield player had a heart attack when we saw that tank
Time stamp
Honestly its personal preference, both have amazing great things about them and both have crippling flaws that if improved, could send them to the top
Both games are absolute bangers but they are different and thats the nice thing! You can play two shooters giving off completly different vibes
Looks like your discord server link expired and your twitter too, great video btw all of your videos awesome!
Weird... are you using Google Chrome? The links don't work for me in Chrome but do work in Edge
@@diehardGG yes im using chrome, idk about twitter but i even try to join your server via discord but it just says your server is not exist or link is expired
@@muaxh03 wow, each of the links had some weird hidden character thing behind them... so none of the links but Twitch were working. Can you check if they're all working now?? I rewrote every single one and made sure there were no spaces at the end... should work now
@@diehardGG it works now i joined your discord and followed you on twitter and everyone should do it too! This man makes good content
@@muaxh03 I really appreciate you pointing this out to me, probably more than you know. It's probably all been broken links for several months. Thank you thank you thank you!
Battlefield: I'm still better than you at graphics
Call of duty: Not for long
Call of duty: hey sledgehammer gives destruction on your new game
Sledgehammer: ok I do my best
Like both. The only difference is how i play it. Cod for quick fun base on short matches and battlefield for the more realistic approach, longer matches and tactical teamwork.
I only have to say one word: crossover
Thanks for posting. I'm buying both; BF 2042 & COD Vanguard. WTH. I'm retired, winter is coming. For about $100 each (about), I'll get hundreds of hours of play. Well worth it, even if I tire or don't like one, I'll still get lots of hours of entertainment. Thank you for your time. Oh ya, all I do is camp, and shot players as they come around corners. I'm to old to run around. ;)
LOVE you yideos
They are equally as good in my opinion, they are just for different audiences and gameplay styles. If you want to play a more realistic and epic massive war shooter, go battlefield. If you want just a fun arcade mode where you can hit sick trick shots and get cool kills, go call of duty. Most of this was already said in the video, but the comments are still a clash of toxicity?
To me it’s always battlefield, more epic, more cinematic, more tactical and more balanced gameplay is what it feels like to me
My lil cousin bacc in 2010 lent me a game called Bad Company 2 and said if I played it I'll never play Cod again I laughed. Left it sitting on my dresser for weeks till I finally gave it a try, he wasn't lying.
Hey man good vid, although i dont think Bf is losing destruction as BF6 has fully destructible things, while call of duty you cant take out a wooden poll with a tank killstreak.
In general here's my take (and yes, I've played call of duty and battlefield) : Battlefield is a more strategic game and it offers huge maps with a lot of epic situations and lots of destruction, you can pretty much destroy everything in the game. Call of duty on the other hand may not offer those huge moments but it has amazing gunplay and very fun, fast paced shooting, plus it has warzone which is a huuge hit and does have a large map and isn't that cqb based. I am more of a battlefield fan myself but we all have to agree that while both games may have their flaws, they are both equally amazing. I am personally more hyped for bf 2042 and its new modes but I am sure that there are other people who are more hyped for cod vanguard. After all, this entire "war" is opinion based and no game is "better" than the other one. They are both just as good (But I do think that bf 2042 will be better lol, don't hate me in the comments for this lmao).
An often overlooked aspect of both games is optimization, BFV is overwhelmingly worse than CODS counterpart however, they feel same visually yet BFV is around 40GBs less. The updates aren't huge as well. I have no clue what those GBs are going into for COD.
If you’re playing a game for visuals then I feel bad for you
@@Clarity_Control ... The visuals are the almost the same, just BF has similar graphics just it has less GBs
I started up with bf3, it was really fun, i was so happy playing
When "The Debate" section started I died🤣👌
Battlefield is better for me, as i enjoy not having to have best specifications to enjoy the game as instead i just need something that barely runs the game at like 30-40 fps and i will still be same, altough battlefield has COD player's still who just play the game and rush which mostly ruins the game. If Call Of Duty Vanguard will be like old COD or BF1 i would change my mind, till then tho its only battlefield i will like.
I remember thinking nothing could take me away from mw2.. then bfbc2 came out
6:29 THE DORITO DUST OFF YOUR FINGERRRRRRS!
COD is also many studios: Raven, Infinity Ward, Treyarch, Sled, Bee... which means more money spent, that's why they have a new game each year, while BF is mainly DICE only.
Exactly
Basically
Cod for campaigns
Battlefield for multiplayer
Cod for fast infantry gameplay
Battlefield for slower paced vehicle gameplay
No battlefield does infantry better bc it’s more immersive
@@trevorpaar9954 No I’m not saying one is better than the other, just that cod is more fast paced
God I wish MW 2019 came out this year. Imagine that. Like back in 2011, with mw3 vs bf3.
Damn yeah.. after mw3 vs bf3, cod has never won a versus.. Remember the good old ghosts vs bf4 meme? It feels the exact same now, after 8 years haha
Vangaurd uses MW2019 engine
@@sooryan_1018 who cares? Also cold war is using mw2019 engine... It simply was "enlightened".. Incurring in getting worse. And BTW, using the same engine doesn't mean it will be a great game as mw2019. Do you know about reskinning a game? How much bad it is?
@@WatdaFrag wrong, cold War used a completely different engine. That's why people did not like CW at first
@@sooryan_1018 no, cw uses a modified version of mw engine..
Can’t compare the satisfaction of mastering bullet drop though… objective here or there… ~relatively quick~ scoping people from a long distance to avoid them seeing the sniper shine is just great.
Great video
Glad you enjoyed it
I honestly might get both lol
Cod went commercial. Bf still puts player experience before making money.
Tell that to bf5
Tell that to EA. EA is laughing at you
well do you like paintball arenas for maps or room for 128 players with vehicles
Let’s be honest guys. It’s the competition between both franchises that makes both of them so good. If there was no competition then why bother trying to make a better game each year. We need each other.
Two sides of the same coin
*A Cod Mobile Player here and all I have to say is I like both battlefield and Cod .*
same
both games are great and i love them both
BF has been know for the craziest multiplayer wars but call of duty focused more on campaign which is ironic as EA literally owns a story focused brand which is Mass effect quite ironic 😂
These titans need to collaborate sometime
What song is that in the background?
COD used to be competing with medal of honor
I play cod for story and Battlefield for multiplayer.
and what happens when you finish the around 20h cod story?
@@MrPolimucil we go to zombies
@@frankwoods9772 poor little kid... spending more than 50€ to play with zombies.... ahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahha
@@MrPolimucil just an mp doesn't define a game
@@MrPolimucil in bf what do you do if you're numbed by the mp
Personally, I like both. The plus side of battlefield is the crazy things like launching a tank onto a skyscraper and jeepstuff, and for COD, it makes you feel like a action movie character riding around in a ATV while a heli crashes and looks cool. So as a player of both, I enjoy the good of these.
8:51 i guess you never saw a Flank on Locker map with Autoshotgun or LMG you cann reck somany kills up if you cann make the flank and change the whole battle if you squad and team counter attacks fast
you forget the !autonuke system that shit make the game boring