The only thing i find funny is during the last mission and Soap's death, Price says "one KIA" and completely ignores his other dead SAS mates who were defending him and soap
Maybe it was originally supposed to be scene where price buys Kia at the dealership but there was misunderstanding in the studio and they made this instead.
so you are saying, that you would rather have mw2 movement, minimap, mechanics etc and just have dlc content added with maps? I dont get how ppl can even say this. mw3 mp is way better than mw2 mp and its not even close. this is just cod cycle hating, next year ppl will say mw3 was underrates😂
@@Foxyconbut tbf he was in a room full of people he knows won’t say anything a funeral is kinda in the open and you can’t control what’s said or who sees
Hey remember when Yuri defected from Zacheiv’s organization because he thought makarov was too extreme and even tried stopping no Russian before joining 141? Now he’s just basic military commander that give intel to laswell.
They also made him look like the naked mole rat from Kim possible and took away any ounce of personality he had. Also, let’s not forget this mission was pure filler 💀💀
The 'No Russian' mission becomes so much worse if you use logic. 1)We have footage of one of the most wanted terrorist(Makarov) boarding a plane that blows up later. 2)The goons in the plane literally used flashbangs in the plane,how the hell did the other cabins not notice this?? 3)Makarov escapes from the plane by opening the plane door... Which is recorded by the plane's black box. 4)Next Mission,We play as Farah to clean up the data from phones that are somehow intact from a bloody plane crash. SHE THEN ERASES DATA FROM THE BLACK BOX WHICH HAS EVIDENCE ABOUT THE PLANE DOOR OPENING.
Yeah, I just.. why??? Why would they ruin one of the most CONTROVERSIAL AND DEVASTATING MISSIONS, a mission where the player has to PARTICIPATE IN A LITERAL MASSACRE AND IS FORCED TO WATCH EVERY SINGLE THING.. But no, they decided to dumb it down where it takes place on a plane, with very low stakes, you can’t even shoot any of the civilians which was THE POINT OF THE NO RUSSIAN MISSION
that is actually a part of every call of duty since first modern warfare maps are connected by dialog and nothing else every mission has it's gimmick even original massacre was lacking because makarov's men can die and makarov says "he's dead leave him" yet game still pulls only allen's death but yes this entire thing in modern modern warfare 3 is so retarded it can't run through a cargo ship solo in less than 60 seconds
Probably one of the worst missions because it's spits on the OGs No Russian, and overall is a poor experience tied to a very poor "Open world" mission.
Multiple black ops campaigns have had multiple endings based on your actions. Bo2 being one of the best examples which had many different endings. Black ops cold war also has multiple endings.
Bro idk how. This is the first cod I skipped in 18 years. I tried getting so many to skip it. But they're too deeply brainwashed. " just give it a chance"
I honestly refuse to believe that. This game got nothing but bad press from even some of the more notorious gaming outlets like IGN, barely anyone I know even bought the game, nor has there been a ton of positivity surrounding the game in general. I know the CoD casuals are always gonna be there but if this really was the second highest selling game of the year then there really is no hope for them and we’ll just have to keep hearing about the newest CoD every damn year
People do not buy games like that. Best selling could just mean 100k-1 million (0.014% max of the entire population) sold titles. That’s a small amount of people buying video games yearly
What piss me off is the fact that they had a great chance for this new universe to write a unforgettable and amazing story But they destroy it all with this god awful campaign
mw 2019's campaign was incredible. they've sidelined alex, one of their most compelling characters in years, and written julian kostov's makarov as too safe. real, real shame
@@echo3xo the campaign right you play as a CIA blonde goon doing dirty work in Middle East and a female rebel fighter who is a leader of liberation resistance especially a female and a dollar store lewis Hamilton look a like serving under captain price.
Just remember bois, with every bug and glitch in this game currently, the item shop has never had one issue functioning and has new content coming nearly every day in the form of 25 dollar skin bundles
@@DrkTheNewGuy You ever played Deep Rock Galactic? I swear to god, DRG is SUCH a breath of fresh air when it comes to live services, and it seriously proves that live services can work. I've yet to come across literally any other live service that's just as good, and I've been gaming for 15-16 years. No microtransactions, no limited-time stuff, no FOMO. Just pure, unrestricted fun. Missed a season? No worries mate, just select it in the terminal and unlock it at your own pace.
28:35 Remember in the Marvel post-credits scene for MW2 where they show the meticulous detail Makarov's group went to getting a single handgun onto a plane? Turns out they also just somehow snuck an entire-ass bomb vest onto the plane too, somehow...offscreen.
The fact that reboot MW3 storyline didn't go full blown WW3 like the OG MW3 and instead went for the lazily retold MW2 route is the most baffling aspect to me.
I mean I wouldve been fine if this game ended with Makarov successfully starting WW3 so the next game could be balls to the wall, but theres no way in hell he succeeded, because 141 pretty much foiled every one of his terrorist attacks. He only succeeded in killing Soap and escaping.
If you consider how many former and current US military and intelligence connections the Activision Blizzard board has these days, and that the US army itself sponsors cod esports events. I think its fair to accuse this whole modern warfare trilogy reboot was just a glorified army recruitment ad to some how sell the military to gen Z as hip and cool. It explains why nothing bad happens to the US military and nothing the US military or the main cast does is framed in any negative light and the games writing always seem to hamfistedly moralize to the player that the ends always justify the means. This is why the writing seems like it was written with baby brain logic. This is why there is no WW3, not terrorist attacks that were instigated by bad actors US like the original trilogy. General Shepherd is no longer a delusional evil man purposefully instigating a world war like in the original instead he’s a well intended man who simply made an oopsy losing the missiles and arming terrorists. All the main plot points in the original trilogy that made the story exciting and tense and didn’t care if it paints the US military in the story in the best of light as that wasn’t the purpose of the original trilogy the writers of the original trilogy was simply trying to tell a fun over the top spy/military action thriller.
Thats really americas consumer as a whole at this point. Everyone is bitching, and we all see the real problems our society is facing, this same problem can be applies to food amongst other things. We all feel it. But to actually not buy something big timmy or darla want? : ( that would make them sad. Forget a change or impact, the poor little fellas might have to give up their precious COD they buy every year. They might have to not have nikes on their feet. I hate "normal" people....
@newt4949 I did. I don't care if it was bad. It had problems but I liked it. I don't give a fuck what you have to say. If you can't handle someone's opinion then get off the internet
MW3 shouldn't of even been DLC for MW2, it SHOULD of been part of the MW2 remastered package, but no they made that just campaign. God I'm so glad Bobby Kotick is out of a job
The biggest issue with this game is the fact that it's a separate release instead of a 70$ game making the last game completely worthless. So everyone who bought MWII,basically wasted their money on that game.
@@AlexGonzalez-ut9ck well that's how all cod games get treated nowadays, but he's saying due to all the mw2 content already being in mw3 then mw2 is literally a useless game with no reason to buy it
The classics maps dont feel good at all because they were designed for 2009s movement. So when you you can get from 1 side of the map to the other in like 4 seconds it completely breaks the flow of the maps for mw3 If you play likes of S&D you see how broken the flow of the maps are with how fast you can move
Pretty much. In 2009's MW2, the maps were perfectly designed for the movement system they had at the time. With them being implemented into MWIII, the maps now feel much smaller due to the new movement system which has you, as you said, zoom from one side of the map to another in 4 seconds.
That is so dumb and not even a thing. Some of the old maps are the same size as the new maps. Quit regurgitating everything you see on social media and start to think for yourself every once in a while.
@@navyvet05 Yeah, they are similar/same size of maps. That's not the point I made. The point I made was due to the original MW2 being a slower game, which it was anyone who's played it can tell you that or if you haven't a simple look at YT gameplay can show you. The difference in speed means that the maps play very differently, which again is obvious for anyone who has played both games. If you've actually seen a lot of this that I posted over 5 months ago, then perhaps there's a trend of those who played the original and felt the same way when playing mw3.
I’m just tired of playing ranked in regular public playlists. Like I don’t expect to only face noobs but I also would like to throw on some music and relax without having to sweat my balls off in my lobbies
This is my biggest gripe so far. Im level 17 and no joke the 10 matches I've played was filled with level 800+ players. I do not give a fuck if I'm "better than them" they have 8 times my playtime and the lobby shouldn't be filled with them. Also everyone is using like 2 guns and nothing else which is cringe for a game with so many guns
Just a little FYI regarding Alex and Graves' survival. For Alex it turns out he actually survived the explosion in a Warzone Season 3 cutscene from MW 2019 apparently only losing his leg; how he actually made it out of that only God knows. And Graves just magically appears in a MW2 cutscene for Season 5. When asked how he survived the tank explosion bro simply says "I wasn't in that tank." Not only did they give these two core and important characters of the COD franchise laughable "explainations" for their survivals but they relegated it to stupid seasonal cutscenes that nobody even watched
The explanations for their survival are the same lazy writing as Palpatine's return in Star Wars. Do people not get paid enough or have enough time to write a thorough and reasonable plot anymore?
@@dontoverthinkit01I'd hazard a guess that Graves was intended to die in that tank, but some exec at Activision decided "Hey, Graves was a cool character that people liked, bring him back or else you're all fired" and the writers said "Okay yeah sure we can definitely do that easily" and had to pull some bullshit out about it.
The funniest thing about the Graves reveal was that they say "Hey, I heard you got blown up in a tank in south america" in the cutscene. The writers didn't realize that Mexico, where MW2 took place and that incident they're referring to happens, is in North America. They think everything below the US border is just South America.
MW2023 is a disgusting slap is the face. The 3 hour campaign filled with lousy bot killing is embarrassing. The same UI is dumb. The lack of faction announcers and music is dumb. SBMM is horrendous. Being forced to use random weapons to level up your weapon of choice is dumb. The rampant voice chat banning is childish and boring. I'm glad COD was laughed at.
Love how after Makarov is presumed dead they still insist on getting a positive ID on the body to be sure, yet when it comes to Graves they just blow up the tank and walk away, all so that Graves can come back with the shitty “I wasnt in that tank” throwaway line
It's so funny too, because they say "we need to confirm the kill" and then just... don't? Price doesn't trust Shepherd at all, mentions how graves wasn't actually dead when it was stated he was but STILL goes back without confirming makarov's kia
MW2019 had such a great campaign (not perfect for a few reasons), but they took a huge dump on that setup with both MW22 and MW23. I just don't get it. The Mexico drug cartel involvement was unnecessary, could/should have left that for Black Ops. The Graves and Shepherd betrayal in MW22 was so fucking stupid and had no emotional weight bc you knew it was coming and the motivations were brainless. Then MW23 just doubled down on the stupidity and ended up killing Soap for shock value in this Absolute Wet Fart of a campaign. If you're gonna kill a TF141 member, why not Price? Also, bringing Alex back undercut the ending of MW19, and bringing Graves back was even more stupid bc you're then expected to be all "ayyy bygones are bygones, right?"
What a twist, tho. Technically, the Cold War campaign and the reboot MW trilogy are connected, so there's a chance Ghost could just be Frank Woods in disguise
The story suffered from the Star Wars syndrome. All of the new stories flopped so they keep going “ey remember the good ol days” by constantly interjecting characters from the older games because those games stories did well
Sledgehammer as a studio died when Condrei and Schofield left. The studio has 0 direction, horrifyingly incompetent. Raven being smaller is a far more capable studio than those jokes at Sledgehammer now. 2 games of a story made by IW ruined by one atrocious campaign with 0 regard for characters, continuity, and logic. Every character was turned into the average Sledghammer employee; brainless, idiotic, coasting off the success of those who worked at the studio before.
Y'all can try to defend the devs, but I'll still hold them accountable for my experience at the end of the day for advertising the game to be a "complete package" and failing to relay the info that it wasn't. I can sympathize with your short dev cycle but that campaign was abysmally bad that ruined the story of the remake series all with one game with shitty writing and DMZ missions dressed up as campaign missions. The writers for that game need to stay away from the industry. Management is to blame for shitty decisions but that doesn't just take away from the incompetence of devs who are clearly fine with shitting out skins for bullets but not having the resources to review a script for the campaign before letting it ride. I'd be ashamed for knowingly putting out dogshit like that from my incompetence at my job. Yet we somehow still have people only putting the blame on upper management to deflect off the incompetence from the devs as well.
I quit COD after Black Ops 3 came back when Modern Warfare came out. I quit again when they came out with MW3 this year and will probably never play COD again. I miss World at War, Modern Warfare the original, MW2 and Black Ops. These new games are junk and its time to move on to something different. I was hoping when they revived the modern warfare series this would be back to old days but sadly no. I feel this franchise is lost.
I agree with you and have the same plan but I want to check out cod 2024, if the rumors are true and treyarch's been allowed to cook for 4 years there might be potential for a fun cod that feels like the old days again. Won't be buying on launch though
MW2019 had an identity. Both sequels have no style. So generic and samey. No commitment to an overarching theme with factions, announcers, music, setting etc.
I thought I was going to buy MWIII but decided to quit playing COD altogether after being fed up with the shady engagement tactics, manipulation, and monetization practices being put in the game by the devs and Activision since 2019. I've been COD-free for over 4 months and I've found much better games to play in my spare time that don't cause my blood pressure to skyrocket 2 minutes into a game. The last COD I truly enjoyed was Cold War, but since then it has been a disaster.
Exact same for me, I played Cold War 2 years because I hated vanguard so much, I played mw2 then quit a couple months before mw3, now I play siege and it’s way funnier imo since I only ever played search anyways
CoD as a whole sucks. I don’t care to play a game with 500 attachments on 500 guns that are outclassed by the same 5 overall guns in the franchise. You die in 1-2 bullets. There is no gunplay or gunfights. It’s just…shit.
How they thought that giving us 80 different sights and grips which u cannot distinguish by the way, is OK, is mind-boggling. Hours and hours wasted to program this BS for nothing, as you said, ppl download the COD app and all the metas are already showed, everybody plays the same guns, there is no variety. I was having pure junky fun when the loadouts were bugged and didnt work, ppl had to be creative and use ground weapons
@philipmarkovic544 I think the 500 grips/sights are meant to appeal to controller operators so they can replicate the $2000 D.D Ar15 they have that never gets shot.
It hasn't been good since WAW and the OG Black ops. I hear one or two of them afterwards were OK but I stopped giving a shit after finishing the Black Ops campaign. Never played BO1 Multiplayer but I hear it was really good. Peak COD is already long gone.
I won't even consider buying a cod if there's SBMM. In online PvP you need only two modes: Random and Ranked. Ranked is for when you want to perform your best. Random is for when you want to just play and chill. Sometimes you have a hard lobby, sometimes an easy or medium one. You can decide to leave the lobby at the end of the game and find a different lobby. This is how we did it back when we played black ops 1 religiously. Sometimes we had a hacker in the lobby, so we looked for a different lobby.
@@RecluseBootsyso true buddy 💯 I’ve been a call of duty player since old cods black ops 2 and one world at war mw2009 og ones I liked mw2019 for a few things but SBMM just ruins it for me and optimse match making I’ve had to a break of cod sometimes and I’ve picked up assassin creed Valhalla because it’s a game I enjoy and less stressful than cod
A very unpopular opinion: "There should just be a single COD multiplayer experience." They can release new GOOD campaign each year or whatever. But I'm tired of new multiplayer every year with different maps. Support multiplayer for 4-5 years and when people get tired of it, release a new MP. This way, studios get time to engineer cool new things and it doesn't feel repetitive. It blows my mind that COD community is not demanding this.
Nah. IMO Multiplayer arcade shooters like COD are too repetitive for a 5 year life. I honestly think COD'S development setup is great with how we can get different flavors from the different devs each year. It's up to the devs to make the game worth a damn which they haven't lately.
@@Tumbus OK. I don't agree but at least you will be enjoying COD's current release cycle. I have checked out of COD before MW3 hit, and will only be interested in it if they release 1 game and they support it for 4-5 years. I ain't paying 70 bucks every year to get a broken mess. But suit yourself I suppose.
Not only did they slapped a 3 instead of a 2. They dared using treyarch name to bait us (those who still havent buy it) into buying the game just for zombies. For me a zombies veteran who has followed the story since BO1 and who also enjoyed the shit out of CW zombies that was a big insult and middle finger.
so true. i was a huge fan of the original black ops/wow zombies, and cold war having round based, and you could extract, perk upgrades and field upgrades were pretty cool, and didn’t change gameplay all that much, easter eggs weren’t too difficult and were enjoyable. thats just round based, outbreak in its own was put together pretty well, not too difficult and if you had a group of good players you could get pretty high into the outbreak rounds.
To your points about Zombies, I play from Japan. If I want to play zombies, it takes at least 5 minutes to find a game, and the game will always be at 200 or more ping. In a sense, it's already dead - in Japan lol
I play on the east coast of the US and I'm having the same issues my game doesn't usually find a match of zombies below 180ms. It doesn't matter what time of the day I'm searching either. So I'm constantly stuck playing games with high latency and packet burst. I'm convinced that's what causes my game to crash daily with the your profile has been signed out error.
“We feel this will be very replayable and really fun for people to watch, I think it’s the most “UA-camable” campaign ever.” *Holy smokes, I almost choked on my breakfast after hearing that*
24:58 just a reminder for everyone on the Internet. If you have a problem with how an actor portrays a character in your favorite media, DO NOT TAKE OUT YOUR HATE ON THE ACTOR! Take it up with the people who were directly in charge of making that character ie executive and the writers
the disrespect this game has for zombies players is insane never has a franchise pulled the rug on me mutiple times inregards to black ops 4/vangard/mw3 zombies
Can we talk about the ridiculous amount of microtransactions for a moment. When you start the game you are overwhelmed with offers for multiple bundles, the battle pass and other things you have to pay for. Instead of being able to play you have to manoeuvre through an awful UI designed to make you spend more money. Idk how this is even legal anymore at this point. It’s like in the gta V mission in which you have to click away pop ups to blow up the tech guys phone but worse because you know you will have to do this every time you want to play the actual game … Also the entire character of ghost feels like he was taken from some kids show and i think that’s hilarious
It was overhated when it came out, but man I loved it since it launched. Pretty much just a slightly more rebalanced MW2 (there's still OP guns and final stand lol) and plenty of great maps! And the campaign was a perfect final sendoff to the OG modern warfare trilogy
What do you mean by "wrap up the trilogy"? There is no continuous story between 2019, MW2 and MW3. You can play them completely separately and miss nothing.
@Deathmare235 MW was a good reboot. MW2 felt like a side quest but at least the story was completely original. MW3 is random bs happening while pretending to be the original Modern Warfare 2. The worst part is that they killed off Soap (again!) in the dumbest way possible because the writers noticed that without a main character's death, this game would have no ending.
facts. I was able to take MW19's campaign somewhat* seriously, a first for COD, and I really enjoyed it. *my gripes include the skirting around real world conflicts (mainly Syria, but Ukraine also) by inventing "Kastovia" and the utterly absurd "Urzikstan"; as well as the main terrorists being referred to as Anarchists (???) for no reason instead of Islamists
What disappoints me the most it that we ALMOST was able to break the cycle . We were so fucking close. I been telling my friends that most of call of duty problems would be fixed if they just STOPPED DOING YEARLY RELEASES. We could’ve even compromised and just done a new COD every two years or something. They new CODs have so much potential, just imagine if they actually had more time to polish this new titles. Activision cant help but appease the investors.
They have to remove their shitty sbmm System Otherwise call of duty will never come back. Besides all the stuff Fans critize since 2013 They recycle old maps 30 times and stupid cod Fans buy a game full of recyclet maps for full price. I think people who buy cod yearly like getting scammed. Cod is garbage. They sell u a copy and paste game made 80% by AI and idiots still buy it. What else does Activision have to do to get people to stop buying the games?
@@alfi341And this is why I supported Microsoft buying ABK. Bench CoD off of yearly releases and make a damn Halo game for the first time in years while giving CoD enough time in the oven to not be shat out half-baked.
If anything they ruined it even more. At least I always got a semi-playable campaign out of the other games. MW3 was literally unplayable. Biggest waste of money I've spent in a long time. Probably the fastest I've ever deleted a game once I saw what was happening. I'll never buy another COD. I'll just play the old ones. Talk about a selfish brand.
SBMM ruined this game for me. I want to relax and have fun, not be stressed out and in a bad mood because the game company feels the need to manipulate my experience by making it extremely competitive.
Idk if keeping gunsmith/not using pick 10 was fully infinity wards choice. Carry forward has allowed them to keep selling all the bundles from MW2 and allow the items to still be used. It seems like a major money focused move, probably from Activision
Before all these live service games it was SIMPLE. Companies would try to make the BEST games possible because that’s what sold the most and therefore made the most money. Now for some reason we buy games that aren’t even finished, hoping they get updated to eventually become good. How activision treats cod like a live service game while simultaneously charging full price for an unpolished release each year AND $40 for new bundles and gets away with it needs to be studied.
kids nowadays dont even know what a good game is, they never experienced it first hand. but still they have to play something, so thats probably CODs biggest playerbase. people under 18 years old. thats the only explanation i have
The fact that The MW2 maps,remastered and all aren’t in MW2 (2022) still pisses me off because when you hear the words “MW2 maps” I’d expect the roster of maps be Afghan, Rust, Sky rise, etc
This MW campaign story is like Disney’s treatment of Star Wars… in that characters cannot die! Basically no one can, hero or villain. The amount of times characters are in situations where they should die or at least be injured and out of the picture for an extended period they just magically decide to be alive and well.
@@spencertaylor-mrliltayfrfr Soap's death was much more impactful in the original MW2. I don't understand why they didn't kill him off in 2022's MW2 if they're just gonna do it with little to no said impact in mw3 just like that
@@spencertaylor-mrliltayit’s mad how little the missions actually matter compared to the old ones, some missions like the dam are entirely filler and could be cut
this is the first time im "boycotting " COD not buying it, i dont care, i had the temptation but no no no... F them, if more people have done it trough the years Ubisoft would be now releasing god tear COD games with great content, great stories, but feels like no one, almost no one can contain themselves even for mediocrity
@@somerandomguywholikeeveryo182 I really am. My only real multiplayer games I play are overwatch and rainbow. I got really hooked in singleplayer games and Helldivers is something I want to buy next
If this had been DLC, the campaign basically should’ve been used on building Makarov up as a villain, with a proper MW3 being the plot to bring him down
Hot take, but I honestly would’ve preferred this but also from the perspective of a new set of characters rather than task force 141. Kind of like Halo ODST where it’s more of a spin off that ties into the story by building up Makarov and maybe introducing some new characters to the saga
@@Deathmare235 exactly! how about make it an American SpecOps team (seeing how the reboot main cast is almost all British) where Roach ends up being the only survivor after the DLC story. He could then join TF141 in a post-credit cutscene and be part of the cast for a potential MW3 where he now has a personal vendetta against Makarov and we were there to experience how it started,
Because it wasn't infinity wards choice OR Sledgehammer Games choice. It was Activision's choice to force IW and SHG to make it MW3 instead of the Las Almas side story like originally intended. MW2 made them a fuck ton of money but also lost them money because of IWs incompetence and ego to do what the community wanted. They saw how much the community started to dwindle. So, they decided to switch gears into it being a new title because of how much bad press MW2 was getting at the halfway point in the summer.
17:57 Hassan isn't Zakhaev's son. He's just a generic middle eastern villain they made up because they forgot they set up Victor Zakhaev (his actual son) as the villain for the next game.
Why would iw dump mw3 on shg if iw literally made mwii the previous year? That's like expecting iw to make 2 back to back cods without asking for help... I think it's more realistic to say Activision wanted a cod that year but Treyarch requested more time... since iw was the only studio that had a recent 3 year dev time, they had more content than Bocw and Vanguard so they were forced to split it between mwii and mwiii. I think all the studios are victims here
All I have to say is with all the money they make They refuse to really get on top of the rampant cheaters, especially the streamers that cheat. I'm seriously surprised people casually play it
I'm still surprised Activision and those who hyped it, hasn't been sued up the ass yet because of the lies and deceit they did. First off Remember when Vanguard and Ricochet was suppose to be released at the same time but magically, Ricochet not only did not release the same time, till this day, Ricochet still doesn't do what all anti-cheats do, ban cheaters. Not only does ricochet doesn't do what its suppose to do, activision actually sponsors and lets "Content Creators" cheat on their game. If you want to scam customers, just watch what Activision is doing because that's what they are doing.
31:17 Price: “I shoulda killed him when we had the chance.” Laswell: “What stopped you…?” Price: “ORDERS!!!” (Flashback mission doesn’t even need to exist now!!)
It’s money, Activision won’t stop doing yearly releases because the fans will eat it up every single time. When you rush the developers they won’t have time to make an actual good product.
seeing people still put MW3 up on top of "best modern COD games" because of muh movement and shit that only sweats care about when there is so much shit piled on MW3 is really telling
It's funny because it's still possible to move in MWII, but it _actually_ requires skill instead of sped up animations that now look janky because they were not meant to be that speed.
I’ll never understand why this is so hard for activision to understand. You have 3 studios who all do 1 thing really well(or at least pretty well) Infinity Ward usually has fun campaigns, SHG usually does pretty good MP, and Treyarch crushes zombies. Just have those 3 teams focus on their strengths. Then have the other studios support as needed. Problem is Warzone has bled in and ruined everything. Campaign is naw Warzone. Zombies is now Warzone. Everything is about Warzone. I’m so happy battle royale games are finally dying out. What a terrible terrible fad
I think Treyarch crushes both Campaign and Zombies together. IW needs to be taken out the picture entirely, they are killing COD slowly but surely with this boring tacticool stuff. I absolutely agree with what you say of Warzone for sure though, that was an irreversible decline for COD
@@samuelwalker3688 it's not the same treyarch that did the bo 1,2 and waw campaign Bo3 was horrible Bo4 didin't even have one Bo cold war was solid but it was more raven than treyarch With zombies i agree they are the best
This MW (Reboot) trilogy feels like the Blade film trilogy. The first entry being solid, the second entry being flawed, but fun, and the last one being trash.
I stopped purchasing COD games like ages ago, but I recently got to try that MW2 reboot with a roommate at their place which is serving as an emergency shelter to us atm (after a good chunk of our apartment burned down in an arsen attempt, dont mind the deets). There was no version 1.0 patch on the disc, we had to download 77 Gigs with our sluggish connection, just to play offline. First strike! Then, we realised that it installed MW3 (which we don't even own), and we had to install MW2 as a DLC. What the hell? Second strike, that's disgusting! Then the game tried to lock us out of offline play, unless I created an Activision account (when playing the PS4 Version by the way), I had to kill the internet to dodge that requirement. Third strike, Activision is out.
I don’t care how good COD is anymore, MW2 received 0 actual updates and no changes asked by the community. Just to surprise us with a 70€ upgrade this year that features most things we asked for. I feel like a complete idiot coming back to COD since BO3
I abandoned CoD when bo4 dropped. As a zombies players what they did to the mode was disgusting. I didn't buy another game until this year when I bought CW on sale 😂. Mw2019 and MW2 looked good but not enough to make me wanna buy them.
@@Shirohige4yonko I mean, they removed a ton of maps and modes and features in favor of a now defunct WZ in 2019. You're objectively getting less of a game now than you would've back in S5 of its own respective life cycle.
Feeling sad for sledgehammer devs, all of their creative freedom taken away, being continuously forced to make the games for whichthey don't have any vision yet they get all the hate from community
True, somehow i feel sorry for them, thats pure injustice but actually the community doesnt know better. They believe devs make decision and embed it into the game while we know that this is not true, there is always the management above that knocks on the door
@@Deathmare235 yeah AW is the only game they made with passion, since then they're literally being treated as support studio, they were forced to cancel aw2 and make ww2, and they didn't even have any plan for making vanguard but Activision forced them to make it
They butchered every game they've touched just about, Advanced Warfare was forgettable, WWII was boring, and Vanguard was just atrocious. They were supposed to develop Cold War but they couldn't get along with Raven Software long enough to finish the game in the deadline limit so they got demoted as lead developers and poor Treyarch got dragged by their ankles into finishing it.
@@kenzieuchiha1191the worst part is they made rumours that it was Treyarch’s fault somehow also they’re bad people in general, their hr department is a cover up
I've always stood by the notion of "If your source material is terrible, then whatever you make from it will be terrible" and the fact the MW3 remake is as bad as the original MW3 is *chef's kiss* lol.
If your game is good enough, time between release and DLC won’t even matter. Elden Ring’s DLC is dropping 2.5 years after release. People still by the latest op’s in Siege’s 9th year! Just make an enjoyable and ever changing game and people will stick around.
Exactly what I'm saying. Chop threw unnecessary shade at a game being a year old. 😂 brother, my game library looks like a decade old time capsule outside of Elden Ring.
I've said numerous times with my friends, that the only thing that would bring me back is a faithful BO2 remaster. But I gotta be honest, I'm not even sure if that would be enough. CoD just needs to end or take a brake or something. Which will never happen because Activision likes money too much. This franchise is dead. Yes, it still makes money and people are still playing it, but CoD as we knew it and what we once loved is dead. I'm dont trying to hold out faith for a return to form and for it to return to it's roots.
*The Community got so consumed and amazed by the movement in MWIII2023* , they failed to see how terrible and inconsistent the game is and the *Multiplayer the gold standard of COD is no longer the primary focus of the game* as it should be ,Automatic disbanding of lobbies nobody ask for that, there a button you press to back out. The game is fast & insane pace but the *RELOADING IS SLOW AND CLUNKY, NO Slight of Hand, Fast Reload, Hustle* , the Snipers are slow and inconsistent gunnfights and hit detection. The MWII2022 movement was intentionally made different just to improve it the next game to keep players in the *Money Matrix*
The hate on MW3 2011 is honestly blasphemous. MW3 2011 is everything MW2 2009 wishes it was. The more balanced modern warfare that has more features, better and balanced perks/weapons, better camos, better maps, better everything really. Enev the campaign. MW3 2011 had a better MP than MW2 2009, BO2, BO1, WAW, Ghosts, and every other CoD besides BO3 and MW 2019.
I know right 😂exactly lmfao mw3 is the best infinity ward game ever made but brain dead dick riders just glaze mw2 constantly just because everyone else on the internet does lmfao
The game crashed, and when I booted it up it said that the only way to get back into the game was to "reset my account, including battle pass and all progress". I uninstalled right there
@@Blooky-yl7bo So, I reinstalled this god-awful "game" to verify that I was correct. After installing this 200 GB monstrosity (why the fuck is it 200GB - I'd say ask your engineers to fix it, but goddamn you must only have one intern), I was first greeted with a lovely "update requires restart" screen. After waiting a minute for my freshly reinstalled game to update, I was then greeted by multiple pages asking me to buy the latest battlepass. After several more minutes of struggling through one of the worst UIs I've ever experienced, I have given up trying to figure out where to find my old battle pass progress. The long and short of it is - this overpriced DLC posing as a game game me an error saying that it reset all of my progress. After logging in, I found that my battle pass was entirely wiped, and all of my custom classes and customizations were gone. So yeah, it was a visual bug, as much as any bug is visual in a video game. Please hire better PR reps for call of duty if you want me to keep playing (I sure hope they are paying you, would be pretty depressing if you were doing this for free), thanks to this I am now motivated to permanently remove it from my steam library!
I just remembered, on the level where you capture Makarov at the stadium and push him around and there’s the mechanic of shoving him 😂 I had lost so much investment in taking the game seriously by that point that I just started goofing off and constantly pushing him around.
MW III is like a bland, boring & forgetable remake movie that functions as a cash grab while MW3 is like a Action movie that you would like to have a thrill if you want to escape from reality.
The original Modern Warfare trilogy is the Star Wars of modern gaming, it basically invented modern gaming as we know it alongside Black Ops 1 & 2 while being arguably the biggest epic you could get at that time that wasn't locked down to one specific console but instead spread across gaming as a whole to become mainstream and set a universal standard.
One major element you left out about the multiplayer is the sheer amount of post-launch support Sledgehammer had provided for the game. It's the most we've ever seen. Not only in terms of seasonal content like maps & guns, but there's also always a mini event active where you can do challenges for exclusive camos, plus there are weekly challanges you can do that often grant another great feature: Aftermarket Parts, which are attachments that essentially turn existing guns into whole new, unique weapons. As someone who goes for the mastery camo, then retires to Search & Destroy every year, it's incredibly refreshing to always have something new and uniqe to try that fundamentally changes up how I approach the game.
I can see the good in MWII. It was its own thing. Same with Vanguard. MWIII is just "Hey, I heard you like Warzone." Also MW3 (2011) definitely isn't perfect either, but I know everyone who plays it remembers "All warfare is based on deception".
The return of graves and shepherd was super confusing to me too, but when I did some research it turns out that he was brought back in warzone 2 please make a video about their attempts at driving the story through warzone without considering players who mainly play campaign or normal multiplayer 🙏🙏
Desperate attempts to adhere to The Disney Marvel plan. They say "you don't need to play the other game/watch the pay-wall shows..." but then they bring back or majorly change characters in random off-shoot scenes buried in niche content. Technically with Echo 3-1, those scenes were locked behind Raids. Meaning you had to buy MW2, wait in a matchmaking lobby for 30 minutes, and play these bunk missions hardly anyone wanted to run. I can't even recall when Graves came back but i recall the studio just quoting the internet in a half-assed line of dialogue. "Oh, i wasn't in the tank..." *next subject.* 😂 it's pathetic attempts at plot twists and fan service.
@RecluseBootsy Funny you mention the Magic Empire, as the original Modern Warfare Trilogy was the Star Wars of modern gaming until Hacktivision butchered it.
The only thing i find funny is during the last mission and Soap's death, Price says "one KIA" and completely ignores his other dead SAS mates who were defending him and soap
Don’t know what’s more disrespectful, him calling soap “one Kia” or disregarding the other guys that died
Maybe it was originally supposed to be scene where price buys Kia at the dealership but there was misunderstanding in the studio and they made this instead.
Pretty sure they were SFO’s actually
@@Purpleblurb😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Victor-vt9cknope their shoulder patches are t141
this could have been huge W as a DLC for MWII, but greed got in the way, its so obvious and everyone knows it.
so you are saying, that you would rather have mw2 movement, minimap, mechanics etc and just have dlc content added with maps? I dont get how ppl can even say this. mw3 mp is way better than mw2 mp and its not even close. this is just cod cycle hating, next year ppl will say mw3 was underrates😂
@rivostark "Way better and its not even close" he says about the essential carbon copy of a piece of dog shite game
@@rivostarkMW3 is super unfun due to the SBMM being 10x higher with every lobby being sweaty as shit
@@rivostark because the standards keep getting lower and lower every year
Yuuuuup 💯
Not the campaign, but multiplayer easily
Nobody ever points out how ghost wasn't even willing to take his mask off for soaps funeral lmao
Lol
not even wear a shiesty too. just straight up halloween costume out in public at his close friends ash spread
C'mon bro ghost never takes off the mask you think he took that off when his mom died nah bro gotta respect the dedication.
@@dogcatcher7041 except for that one time he took his mask off in mw22 after the Mexican Ops rescue level lmao
@@Foxyconbut tbf he was in a room full of people he knows won’t say anything a funeral is kinda in the open and you can’t control what’s said or who sees
Hey remember when Yuri defected from Zacheiv’s organization because he thought makarov was too extreme and even tried stopping no Russian before joining 141? Now he’s just basic military commander that give intel to laswell.
The funny thing is that guy might not even be Yuri, he might be just some random Russian guy
Your mom
I got a brain aneurysm from that spelling of Zakhaev.
And he more than likely died right after giving that info to laswell lol
They also made him look like the naked mole rat from Kim possible and took away any ounce of personality he had. Also, let’s not forget this mission was pure filler 💀💀
The 'No Russian' mission becomes so much worse if you use logic.
1)We have footage of one of the most wanted terrorist(Makarov) boarding a plane that blows up later.
2)The goons in the plane literally used flashbangs in the plane,how the hell did the other cabins not notice this??
3)Makarov escapes from the plane by opening the plane door... Which is recorded by the plane's black box.
4)Next Mission,We play as Farah to clean up the data from phones that are somehow intact from a bloody plane crash. SHE THEN ERASES DATA FROM THE BLACK BOX WHICH HAS EVIDENCE ABOUT THE PLANE DOOR OPENING.
Yeah, I just.. why??? Why would they ruin one of the most CONTROVERSIAL AND DEVASTATING MISSIONS, a mission where the player has to PARTICIPATE IN A LITERAL MASSACRE AND IS FORCED TO WATCH EVERY SINGLE THING..
But no, they decided to dumb it down where it takes place on a plane, with very low stakes, you can’t even shoot any of the civilians which was THE POINT OF THE NO RUSSIAN MISSION
that is actually a part of every call of duty since first modern warfare
maps are connected by dialog and nothing else
every mission has it's gimmick
even original massacre was lacking because makarov's men can die and makarov says "he's dead leave him" yet game still pulls only allen's death
but yes
this entire thing in modern modern warfare 3 is so retarded it can't run through a cargo ship solo in less than 60 seconds
Probably one of the worst missions because it's spits on the OGs No Russian, and overall is a poor experience tied to a very poor "Open world" mission.
Farah was just a Kurdish diversity hire Mary Sue boss babe shoe in.
Multiple black ops campaigns have had multiple endings based on your actions. Bo2 being one of the best examples which had many different endings. Black ops cold war also has multiple endings.
what pisses me off the most is that this was the second best selling game of 2023. activision is going to keep doing this
Bro idk how. This is the first cod I skipped in 18 years. I tried getting so many to skip it. But they're too deeply brainwashed. " just give it a chance"
I honestly refuse to believe that. This game got nothing but bad press from even some of the more notorious gaming outlets like IGN, barely anyone I know even bought the game, nor has there been a ton of positivity surrounding the game in general. I know the CoD casuals are always gonna be there but if this really was the second highest selling game of the year then there really is no hope for them and we’ll just have to keep hearing about the newest CoD every damn year
I guess people were kinda expecting a lot since MW2 did farely well and had high expectations for the story (etc)
And well
People do not buy games like that. Best selling could just mean 100k-1 million (0.014% max of the entire population) sold titles. That’s a small amount of people buying video games yearly
@@PurpMurklmao. Nobody cares what you think
What piss me off is the fact that they had a great chance for this new universe
to write a unforgettable and amazing story
But they destroy it all with this god awful campaign
mw 2019's campaign was incredible. they've sidelined alex, one of their most compelling characters in years, and written julian kostov's makarov as too safe. real, real shame
@@echo3xomw2019 was terrible pathetic campaign noob safe space maps terrible gameplay the game that started SBMM garbage servers and so on.
This issue started in mw2 and even warzone
@@SergeantTylerWells MP sucked nuts, hard. stand by my opinion on campaign, but it's different strokes ig :) no biggie
@@echo3xo the campaign right you play as a CIA blonde goon doing dirty work in Middle East and a female rebel fighter who is a leader of liberation resistance especially a female and a dollar store lewis Hamilton look a like serving under captain price.
OG MW3 was still fun to play. This one is like a job you don't get paid for.
A job we actually paid to do if we go even deeper
The original MW3 was classic imo I’m in the camp of people who loved it 👌
@@radiatormike6090me too bro, even Nadeshot admits it’s a top 3 cod
Why'd I grind that 1.2 million camo event. That shit was so ass
@@jaweel6205it’s my favorite
Just remember bois, with every bug and glitch in this game currently, the item shop has never had one issue functioning and has new content coming nearly every day in the form of 25 dollar skin bundles
That's every game. Every game that's ever come out rushed, broken and unplayable, has had a pristine MTX shop on launch day.
Same thing with ads in generall
With the greed of activision, Its not a surprise when they put most of their effort into the money-makers
@@DrkTheNewGuy You ever played Deep Rock Galactic? I swear to god, DRG is SUCH a breath of fresh air when it comes to live services, and it seriously proves that live services can work. I've yet to come across literally any other live service that's just as good, and I've been gaming for 15-16 years. No microtransactions, no limited-time stuff, no FOMO. Just pure, unrestricted fun. Missed a season? No worries mate, just select it in the terminal and unlock it at your own pace.
cuz they want nothing but money they dont care about quality entertainment
28:35 Remember in the Marvel post-credits scene for MW2 where they show the meticulous detail Makarov's group went to getting a single handgun onto a plane? Turns out they also just somehow snuck an entire-ass bomb vest onto the plane too, somehow...offscreen.
Basically MW(202)3 in a nutshell
The fact that reboot MW3 storyline didn't go full blown WW3 like the OG MW3 and instead went for the lazily retold MW2 route is the most baffling aspect to me.
I mean I wouldve been fine if this game ended with Makarov successfully starting WW3 so the next game could be balls to the wall, but theres no way in hell he succeeded, because 141 pretty much foiled every one of his terrorist attacks. He only succeeded in killing Soap and escaping.
@@pupperjackcheese At most he did “a little tomfoolery.”
this should've been mwii you right ngl
They didn’t have the time and if they did I think they would have done ww3
If you consider how many former and current US military and intelligence connections the Activision Blizzard board has these days, and that the US army itself sponsors cod esports events. I think its fair to accuse this whole modern warfare trilogy reboot was just a glorified army recruitment ad to some how sell the military to gen Z as hip and cool. It explains why nothing bad happens to the US military and nothing the US military or the main cast does is framed in any negative light and the games writing always seem to hamfistedly moralize to the player that the ends always justify the means. This is why the writing seems like it was written with baby brain logic. This is why there is no WW3, not terrorist attacks that were instigated by bad actors US like the original trilogy. General Shepherd is no longer a delusional evil man purposefully instigating a world war like in the original instead he’s a well intended man who simply made an oopsy losing the missiles and arming terrorists. All the main plot points in the original trilogy that made the story exciting and tense and didn’t care if it paints the US military in the story in the best of light as that wasn’t the purpose of the original trilogy the writers of the original trilogy was simply trying to tell a fun over the top spy/military action thriller.
Love how Ghost takes his mask off in front of people he doesn’t even know in MWII but when Soap dies….. sorry mate no can do!!!
cod players are like addicted gamblers at this point. idk how many bad games you’re gonna get before you stop buying the games 😭
Until they run their pockets dry. Or until they grow up and get some standards and self respect.
They just love getting hoed (I say this having bought MW19 for sale of Steam)
@@OrionDawn15 im just in it for treyarch zombies at this point
Thats really americas consumer as a whole at this point. Everyone is bitching, and we all see the real problems our society is facing, this same problem can be applies to food amongst other things. We all feel it.
But to actually not buy something big timmy or darla want? : ( that would make them sad. Forget a change or impact, the poor little fellas might have to give up their precious COD they buy every year. They might have to not have nikes on their feet. I hate "normal" people....
Hey, dont discount infinity ward zombies. Infinite warfare zombies is the third best zombies game.
"Marvel movie post-credit scene for terrorism" is KILLING me
i love how spec ops failed miserably in mw2019 and sledgehammers response to this was "lets put it in the campaign but without the co-op"
I feel like the only person in history who genuinely likes mw2019's spec ops
@@Gta4isgarbageyour username is gta4isgarbage.
You wouldn't know taste if it smacked you in the face.
@@bldontmatter5319 Womp womp. Cry about it
@@Gta4isgarbagethere’s no way, that mode is slop and you shoveled it in your face 😂
@newt4949 I did. I don't care if it was bad. It had problems but I liked it. I don't give a fuck what you have to say. If you can't handle someone's opinion then get off the internet
Bobby really needed a good payout before he retired to his fifth yacht
MW3 shouldn't of even been DLC for MW2, it SHOULD of been part of the MW2 remastered package, but no they made that just campaign.
God I'm so glad Bobby Kotick is out of a job
Now, will his replacement be any better?
@@OrionDawn15How much you wanna bet it’s another ✡️?
*shouldn’t have
It's not.🤡
Bobby kotick retired a millionaire and got off with zero issues.
He was a fall guy, like the owner of GameStop.
The biggest issue with this game is the fact that it's a separate release instead of a 70$ game making the last game completely worthless. So everyone who bought MWII,basically wasted their money on that game.
^This. I uninstalled MWII after a couple months because of the lack of updates.
Yeah I have mw2 only on my ps5 and it’s basically useless everything is mw3 now . Like you have to buy mw3 to keep playing mw2 more or less
bro shut up you dont even play like dat
Activision intentionally made boring and ugly maps in MW2022 to coax players to buy the sequel with the beloved OG 2009 MAPS.
@@AlexGonzalez-ut9ck well that's how all cod games get treated nowadays, but he's saying due to all the mw2 content already being in mw3 then mw2 is literally a useless game with no reason to buy it
The best thing I ever did was leave cod.
The classics maps dont feel good at all because they were designed for 2009s movement. So when you you can get from 1 side of the map to the other in like 4 seconds it completely breaks the flow of the maps for mw3
If you play likes of S&D you see how broken the flow of the maps are with how fast you can move
Pretty much. In 2009's MW2, the maps were perfectly designed for the movement system they had at the time.
With them being implemented into MWIII, the maps now feel much smaller due to the new movement system which has you, as you said, zoom from one side of the map to another in 4 seconds.
Activision don't sell games anymore. They just sell nostalgia to boneheaded zoomers who think 2009 was a hundred years ago and not last week.
That is so dumb and not even a thing. Some of the old maps are the same size as the new maps. Quit regurgitating everything you see on social media and start to think for yourself every once in a while.
@@navyvet05 Yeah, they are similar/same size of maps. That's not the point I made. The point I made was due to the original MW2 being a slower game, which it was anyone who's played it can tell you that or if you haven't a simple look at YT gameplay can show you.
The difference in speed means that the maps play very differently, which again is obvious for anyone who has played both games.
If you've actually seen a lot of this that I posted over 5 months ago, then perhaps there's a trend of those who played the original and felt the same way when playing mw3.
I’m just tired of playing ranked in regular public playlists. Like I don’t expect to only face noobs but I also would like to throw on some music and relax without having to sweat my balls off in my lobbies
I miss being able to enjoy a win, but now ik if i have any sort of win-streak ik I'm about to be gangbanged by a group of sweat-lords
This is my biggest gripe so far. Im level 17 and no joke the 10 matches I've played was filled with level 800+ players. I do not give a fuck if I'm "better than them" they have 8 times my playtime and the lobby shouldn't be filled with them.
Also everyone is using like 2 guns and nothing else which is cringe for a game with so many guns
@@George_Rakkas only guns you’ll see right now is the RPK Jak part and the superi
Just a little FYI regarding Alex and Graves' survival. For Alex it turns out he actually survived the explosion in a Warzone Season 3 cutscene from MW 2019 apparently only losing his leg; how he actually made it out of that only God knows. And Graves just magically appears in a MW2 cutscene for Season 5. When asked how he survived the tank explosion bro simply says "I wasn't in that tank." Not only did they give these two core and important characters of the COD franchise laughable "explainations" for their survivals but they relegated it to stupid seasonal cutscenes that nobody even watched
Graves surviving was lazy, but, it was a lot more believable than Alex surviving a *manually* detonated bomb.
The explanations for their survival are the same lazy writing as Palpatine's return in Star Wars. Do people not get paid enough or have enough time to write a thorough and reasonable plot anymore?
@@dontoverthinkit01I'd hazard a guess that Graves was intended to die in that tank, but some exec at Activision decided "Hey, Graves was a cool character that people liked, bring him back or else you're all fired" and the writers said "Okay yeah sure we can definitely do that easily" and had to pull some bullshit out about it.
Well, people watched it because every season had an unskippable cutscene
The funniest thing about the Graves reveal was that they say "Hey, I heard you got blown up in a tank in south america" in the cutscene. The writers didn't realize that Mexico, where MW2 took place and that incident they're referring to happens, is in North America. They think everything below the US border is just South America.
MW2023 is a disgusting slap is the face. The 3 hour campaign filled with lousy bot killing is embarrassing. The same UI is dumb. The lack of faction announcers and music is dumb. SBMM is horrendous. Being forced to use random weapons to level up your weapon of choice is dumb. The rampant voice chat banning is childish and boring. I'm glad COD was laughed at.
Makarov in the new modern warfare just feels like prices ex-boyfriend trying to get back at him for cheating on him
YOU DID NOT JUST SAY THAT LMAOOO😭😭
I loved when Markov said “it’s Markovin Time” and Markoved all over task force 141. Truly amazing, only in the DLC called Modern Warfare 5
Love how after Makarov is presumed dead they still insist on getting a positive ID on the body to be sure, yet when it comes to Graves they just blow up the tank and walk away, all so that Graves can come back with the shitty “I wasnt in that tank” throwaway line
It's so funny too, because they say "we need to confirm the kill" and then just... don't? Price doesn't trust Shepherd at all, mentions how graves wasn't actually dead when it was stated he was but STILL goes back without confirming makarov's kia
MW2019 had such a great campaign (not perfect for a few reasons), but they took a huge dump on that setup with both MW22 and MW23. I just don't get it. The Mexico drug cartel involvement was unnecessary, could/should have left that for Black Ops. The Graves and Shepherd betrayal in MW22 was so fucking stupid and had no emotional weight bc you knew it was coming and the motivations were brainless. Then MW23 just doubled down on the stupidity and ended up killing Soap for shock value in this Absolute Wet Fart of a campaign. If you're gonna kill a TF141 member, why not Price? Also, bringing Alex back undercut the ending of MW19, and bringing Graves back was even more stupid bc you're then expected to be all "ayyy bygones are bygones, right?"
Milena- “why the mask?”
Ghost- “I’m a Goddamn Onion Milena”
Lmfaoo
Lmfao
What a twist, tho. Technically, the Cold War campaign and the reboot MW trilogy are connected, so there's a chance Ghost could just be Frank Woods in disguise
@@starchymuffins0086 I would hate that plus i I like woods way better
Roach was killed by Shepard with Ghost. It was pvt Allen that was a CIA asset that died in no Russian
He knows, he corrected his statement at 25:34 where the text says the correct information.
The story suffered from the Star Wars syndrome. All of the new stories flopped so they keep going “ey remember the good ol days” by constantly interjecting characters from the older games because those games stories did well
another symptom of Star Wars syndrome: reviving dead characters no matter how little fucking sense it makes
Sledgehammer as a studio died when Condrei and Schofield left. The studio has 0 direction, horrifyingly incompetent. Raven being smaller is a far more capable studio than those jokes at Sledgehammer now. 2 games of a story made by IW ruined by one atrocious campaign with 0 regard for characters, continuity, and logic. Every character was turned into the average Sledghammer employee; brainless, idiotic, coasting off the success of those who worked at the studio before.
Mw3 had only 16 months to develop which is less than half of what it usually takes, so i wouldnt put much blame on sledgehammer
Why you blaming the devs? Activison calls most the shots, the devs are victims if anything
Y'all can try to defend the devs, but I'll still hold them accountable for my experience at the end of the day for advertising the game to be a "complete package" and failing to relay the info that it wasn't. I can sympathize with your short dev cycle but that campaign was abysmally bad that ruined the story of the remake series all with one game with shitty writing and DMZ missions dressed up as campaign missions. The writers for that game need to stay away from the industry. Management is to blame for shitty decisions but that doesn't just take away from the incompetence of devs who are clearly fine with shitting out skins for bullets but not having the resources to review a script for the campaign before letting it ride. I'd be ashamed for knowingly putting out dogshit like that from my incompetence at my job. Yet we somehow still have people only putting the blame on upper management to deflect off the incompetence from the devs as well.
Sledgehammer was never a capable dev team
You are giving sledgehammer way too much credit. They are just not good at making COD games lol
I quit COD after Black Ops 3 came back when Modern Warfare came out. I quit again when they came out with MW3 this year and will probably never play COD again. I miss World at War, Modern Warfare the original, MW2 and Black Ops. These new games are junk and its time to move on to something different. I was hoping when they revived the modern warfare series this would be back to old days but sadly no. I feel this franchise is lost.
your not gonna play treyarchs new game?
They will, everyone always says they quit but they always come back, Just a bunch of liars @@hawktuahstillwater
I agree with you and have the same plan but I want to check out cod 2024, if the rumors are true and treyarch's been allowed to cook for 4 years there might be potential for a fun cod that feels like the old days again. Won't be buying on launch though
MW2019 had an identity. Both sequels have no style. So generic and samey. No commitment to an overarching theme with factions, announcers, music, setting etc.
@@HULK-HOGAN12019 was shit mw2 2022 was better way less camping
I thought I was going to buy MWIII but decided to quit playing COD altogether after being fed up with the shady engagement tactics, manipulation, and monetization practices being put in the game by the devs and Activision since 2019. I've been COD-free for over 4 months and I've found much better games to play in my spare time that don't cause my blood pressure to skyrocket 2 minutes into a game. The last COD I truly enjoyed was Cold War, but since then it has been a disaster.
Exact same for me, I played Cold War 2 years because I hated vanguard so much, I played mw2 then quit a couple months before mw3, now I play siege and it’s way funnier imo since I only ever played search anyways
@@colespradlin5440the new year in siege is gonna be really good with the things that come in year 9
The whole situation with Nicmercs was also ridiculous
I play helldivers with a friends sometimes but I pretty much hugely cut down on playing games altogether about a year ago
your not gonna play treyarchs new game?
CoD as a whole sucks. I don’t care to play a game with 500 attachments on 500 guns that are outclassed by the same 5 overall guns in the franchise. You die in 1-2 bullets. There is no gunplay or gunfights. It’s just…shit.
How they thought that giving us 80 different sights and grips which u cannot distinguish by the way, is OK, is mind-boggling. Hours and hours wasted to program this BS for nothing, as you said, ppl download the COD app and all the metas are already showed, everybody plays the same guns, there is no variety. I was having pure junky fun when the loadouts were bugged and didnt work, ppl had to be creative and use ground weapons
@philipmarkovic544 I think the 500 grips/sights are meant to appeal to controller operators so they can replicate the $2000 D.D Ar15 they have that never gets shot.
75 lasers for one gun lol
It hasn't been good since WAW and the OG Black ops. I hear one or two of them afterwards were OK but I stopped giving a shit after finishing the Black Ops campaign.
Never played BO1 Multiplayer but I hear it was really good. Peak COD is already long gone.
you die in 1-2 bullets what do you think this is tarkov. Bruh you die after dumb haft a mag on someone
I won't even consider buying a cod if there's SBMM. In online PvP you need only two modes: Random and Ranked. Ranked is for when you want to perform your best. Random is for when you want to just play and chill. Sometimes you have a hard lobby, sometimes an easy or medium one. You can decide to leave the lobby at the end of the game and find a different lobby. This is how we did it back when we played black ops 1 religiously. Sometimes we had a hacker in the lobby, so we looked for a different lobby.
Couldn't agree more. Not everything needs to be a sweatfest.
@@RecluseBootsyso true buddy 💯 I’ve been a call of duty player since old cods black ops 2 and one world at war mw2009 og ones I liked mw2019 for a few things but SBMM just ruins it for me and optimse match making I’ve had to a break of cod sometimes and I’ve picked up assassin creed Valhalla because it’s a game I enjoy and less stressful than cod
A very unpopular opinion: "There should just be a single COD multiplayer experience."
They can release new GOOD campaign each year or whatever. But I'm tired of new multiplayer every year with different maps.
Support multiplayer for 4-5 years and when people get tired of it, release a new MP. This way, studios get time to engineer cool new things and it doesn't feel repetitive. It blows my mind that COD community is not demanding this.
That's what cod mobile is lol imagine a mobile game being better.
Nah. IMO Multiplayer arcade shooters like COD are too repetitive for a 5 year life. I honestly think COD'S development setup is great with how we can get different flavors from the different devs each year. It's up to the devs to make the game worth a damn which they haven't lately.
@@Tumbus OK. I don't agree but at least you will be enjoying COD's current release cycle.
I have checked out of COD before MW3 hit, and will only be interested in it if they release 1 game and they support it for 4-5 years. I ain't paying 70 bucks every year to get a broken mess.
But suit yourself I suppose.
@@appledore different strokes for different folks🤝
@@Tumbus Yep. 🤝
Not only did they slapped a 3 instead of a 2. They dared using treyarch name to bait us (those who still havent buy it) into buying the game just for zombies. For me a zombies veteran who has followed the story since BO1 and who also enjoyed the shit out of CW zombies that was a big insult and middle finger.
They became a boated company with terrible devs that cant do anything but steal from the real devs that BUILT this franchise.
so true. i was a huge fan of the original black ops/wow zombies, and cold war having round based, and you could extract, perk upgrades and field upgrades were pretty cool, and didn’t change gameplay all that much, easter eggs weren’t too difficult and were enjoyable. thats just round based, outbreak in its own was put together pretty well, not too difficult and if you had a group of good players you could get pretty high into the outbreak rounds.
Same man
I feel your pain man I was so exited until I realized I was jumping off a plane 👎👎👎
Infinite warfare zombies is better than this shite
To your points about Zombies, I play from Japan. If I want to play zombies, it takes at least 5 minutes to find a game, and the game will always be at 200 or more ping. In a sense, it's already dead - in Japan lol
I play on the east coast of the US and I'm having the same issues my game doesn't usually find a match of zombies below 180ms. It doesn't matter what time of the day I'm searching either. So I'm constantly stuck playing games with high latency and packet burst. I'm convinced that's what causes my game to crash daily with the your profile has been signed out error.
@@AntimedalI wonder if it’s shitty net code mixed with server issues, wouldn’t surprise me with how slapped together and rushed MW3 was.
@@Antimedalwrong
I loved the original MW3. MW2 was supposed to get a ton more fixes, until Infinity Ward had a fallout with Activision.
Bro I watched the whole video from start to finish without skipping, very very good content keep it up man!
“We feel this will be very replayable and really fun for people to watch, I think it’s the most “UA-camable” campaign ever.”
*Holy smokes, I almost choked on my breakfast after hearing that*
The levels of delusion.. Simply astounding. Selfish, money-grabbing nonsense.
24:58 just a reminder for everyone on the Internet. If you have a problem with how an actor portrays a character in your favorite media, DO NOT TAKE OUT YOUR HATE ON THE ACTOR! Take it up with the people who were directly in charge of making that character ie executive and the writers
I get the hate for reboot Makarov but people really projecting it on the actor
Laura bailey all over again
They already said the next cod will be open world. Get ready to play campaign, zombies, and warzone in the same map 😂
RIP TO THIS GARBAGE SERIES
🍅🍅🍅 🍅 booo
You were saying
the disrespect this game has for zombies players is insane
never has a franchise pulled the rug on me mutiple times inregards to black ops 4/vangard/mw3 zombies
I feel happy that I still own a running ps3 at home with COD waw and Bo1. It feels
refreshing to play Der Riese or Nacht online
@@philipmarkovic544grief mode
@@krle7970 wut ?
@@philipmarkovic544 BO2 Zombies Grief is the best
The original modern warfare 3 was the last cod I ever bought. It felt like an experiment to see if we'd buy any old shit
Can we talk about the ridiculous amount of microtransactions for a moment. When you start the game you are overwhelmed with offers for multiple bundles, the battle pass and other things you have to pay for. Instead of being able to play you have to manoeuvre through an awful UI designed to make you spend more money. Idk how this is even legal anymore at this point. It’s like in the gta V mission in which you have to click away pop ups to blow up the tech guys phone but worse because you know you will have to do this every time you want to play the actual game …
Also the entire character of ghost feels like he was taken from some kids show and i think that’s hilarious
OG MW3 was actually S tier game
It was overhated when it came out, but man I loved it since it launched. Pretty much just a slightly more rebalanced MW2 (there's still OP guns and final stand lol) and plenty of great maps!
And the campaign was a perfect final sendoff to the OG modern warfare trilogy
My favorite CoD. I still play it even after 12 years.
More like B tier tbh
You’re talking as if Ch0pper has braincells.
A casual Treyarch fanboy that got blessed by the algorithm.
Best Ak in the series
What do you mean by "wrap up the trilogy"? There is no continuous story between 2019, MW2 and MW3. You can play them completely separately and miss nothing.
It’s mad how little mw19 and mwll actually connect
@Deathmare235 MW was a good reboot. MW2 felt like a side quest but at least the story was completely original. MW3 is random bs happening while pretending to be the original Modern Warfare 2.
The worst part is that they killed off Soap (again!) in the dumbest way possible because the writers noticed that without a main character's death, this game would have no ending.
@@mattmark94The ending: ua-cam.com/video/4tvAjX5ACPo/v-deo.htmlsi=QZxjUvor54Sb_xgr
facts. I was able to take MW19's campaign somewhat* seriously, a first for COD, and I really enjoyed it.
*my gripes include the skirting around real world conflicts (mainly Syria, but Ukraine also) by inventing "Kastovia" and the utterly absurd "Urzikstan"; as well as the main terrorists being referred to as Anarchists (???) for no reason instead of Islamists
What disappoints me the most it that we ALMOST was able to break the cycle . We were so fucking close. I been telling my friends that most of call of duty problems would be fixed if they just STOPPED DOING YEARLY RELEASES. We could’ve even compromised and just done a new COD every two years or something. They new CODs have so much potential, just imagine if they actually had more time to polish this new titles. Activision cant help but appease the investors.
We were never close to breaking the cycle, they never intended to stop yearly release in fact this proves the opposite
They have to remove their shitty sbmm System
Otherwise call of duty will never come back.
Besides all the stuff Fans critize since 2013
They recycle old maps 30 times and stupid cod Fans buy a game full of recyclet maps for full price.
I think people who buy cod yearly like getting scammed.
Cod is garbage.
They sell u a copy and paste game made 80% by AI and idiots still buy it.
What else does Activision have to do to get people to stop buying the games?
SBMM? @@alfi341
@@alfi341And this is why I supported Microsoft buying ABK. Bench CoD off of yearly releases and make a damn Halo game for the first time in years while giving CoD enough time in the oven to not be shat out half-baked.
If anything they ruined it even more. At least I always got a semi-playable campaign out of the other games. MW3 was literally unplayable. Biggest waste of money I've spent in a long time. Probably the fastest I've ever deleted a game once I saw what was happening. I'll never buy another COD. I'll just play the old ones. Talk about a selfish brand.
SBMM ruined this game for me. I want to relax and have fun, not be stressed out and in a bad mood because the game company feels the need to manipulate my experience by making it extremely competitive.
This game existing at all is what ruined it for me.
SBMM AND EOMM RUINED cod yes but I adapted to it by camping :))))
@@kieroncousins3134
Sounds absolutely thrilling...
@@PointsofData the way it is now.
@@kieroncousins3134
Then stop playing?
Idk if keeping gunsmith/not using pick 10 was fully infinity wards choice. Carry forward has allowed them to keep selling all the bundles from MW2 and allow the items to still be used. It seems like a major money focused move, probably from Activision
Before all these live service games it was SIMPLE. Companies would try to make the BEST games possible because that’s what sold the most and therefore made the most money.
Now for some reason we buy games that aren’t even finished, hoping they get updated to eventually become good.
How activision treats cod like a live service game while simultaneously charging full price for an unpolished release each year AND $40 for new bundles and gets away with it needs to be studied.
more than half the whole population is very very dumb
kids nowadays dont even know what a good game is, they never experienced it first hand. but still they have to play something, so thats probably CODs biggest playerbase. people under 18 years old. thats the only explanation i have
You can’t expect some pencil pushing executive to understand what makes a game engaging for the player. All they see is the extra payday
@@MacroKnightThat’s legit been the case for awhile, casual players.
That's just not true at all
The fact that The MW2 maps,remastered and all aren’t in MW2 (2022) still pisses me off because when you hear the words “MW2 maps” I’d expect the roster of maps be Afghan, Rust, Sky rise, etc
This MW campaign story is like Disney’s treatment of Star Wars… in that characters cannot die! Basically no one can, hero or villain. The amount of times characters are in situations where they should die or at least be injured and out of the picture for an extended period they just magically decide to be alive and well.
and when they do they decided to make it the least impactful and lamest death ever
@@breakfastlover4so totally agreed! Just killed our boy off in a mission that really could’ve been cut out of the rest of the story and not mattered.
@@spencertaylor-mrliltayfrfr
Soap's death was much more impactful in the original MW2.
I don't understand why they didn't kill him off in 2022's MW2 if they're just gonna do it with little to no said impact in mw3 just like that
@@moezfoez he died in mw3, not mw2
@@spencertaylor-mrliltayit’s mad how little the missions actually matter compared to the old ones, some missions like the dam are entirely filler and could be cut
this is the first time im "boycotting " COD not buying it, i dont care, i had the temptation but no no no... F them, if more people have done it trough the years Ubisoft would be now releasing god tear COD games with great content, great stories, but feels like no one, almost no one can contain themselves even for mediocrity
The old MW3 wasn’t bad! What am I missing that others aren’t? The RPD was the best in that one.
Im so glad I quit after Cold War
Same here
No u didn’t u just saying that
@@somerandomguywholikeeveryo182
I really am. My only real multiplayer games I play are overwatch and rainbow. I got really hooked in singleplayer games and Helldivers is something I want to buy next
Same
Cold War is actually pretty good now
If this had been DLC, the campaign basically should’ve been used on building Makarov up as a villain, with a proper MW3 being the plot to bring him down
THIS!!!
Hot take, but I honestly would’ve preferred this but also from the perspective of a new set of characters rather than task force 141. Kind of like Halo ODST where it’s more of a spin off that ties into the story by building up Makarov and maybe introducing some new characters to the saga
@@normalpyro9757would’ve given an excuse to kill of the main characters and make Makarov look threatening
@@Deathmare235 exactly! how about make it an American SpecOps team (seeing how the reboot main cast is almost all British) where Roach ends up being the only survivor after the DLC story. He could then join TF141 in a post-credit cutscene and be part of the cast for a potential MW3 where he now has a personal vendetta against Makarov and we were there to experience how it started,
@@FHT1883 would be cool if we get a crew but they all die, completely expendable
Because it wasn't infinity wards choice OR Sledgehammer Games choice. It was Activision's choice to force IW and SHG to make it MW3 instead of the Las Almas side story like originally intended. MW2 made them a fuck ton of money but also lost them money because of IWs incompetence and ego to do what the community wanted. They saw how much the community started to dwindle. So, they decided to switch gears into it being a new title because of how much bad press MW2 was getting at the halfway point in the summer.
17:57 Hassan isn't Zakhaev's son. He's just a generic middle eastern villain they made up because they forgot they set up Victor Zakhaev (his actual son) as the villain for the next game.
Why would iw dump mw3 on shg if iw literally made mwii the previous year? That's like expecting iw to make 2 back to back cods without asking for help... I think it's more realistic to say Activision wanted a cod that year but Treyarch requested more time... since iw was the only studio that had a recent 3 year dev time, they had more content than Bocw and Vanguard so they were forced to split it between mwii and mwiii. I think all the studios are victims here
All I have to say is with all the money they make They refuse to really get on top of the rampant cheaters, especially the streamers that cheat. I'm seriously surprised people casually play it
I'm still surprised Activision and those who hyped it, hasn't been sued up the ass yet because of the lies and deceit they did. First off Remember when Vanguard and Ricochet was suppose to be released at the same time but magically, Ricochet not only did not release the same time, till this day, Ricochet still doesn't do what all anti-cheats do, ban cheaters. Not only does ricochet doesn't do what its suppose to do, activision actually sponsors and lets "Content Creators" cheat on their game. If you want to scam customers, just watch what Activision is doing because that's what they are doing.
You sue them then
@@jollamagonna need a powerful budget for that, thanks to America's broken legal system giving companies extreme power
31:17 Price: “I shoulda killed him when we had the chance.”
Laswell: “What stopped you…?”
Price: “ORDERS!!!”
(Flashback mission doesn’t even need to exist now!!)
It’s money, Activision won’t stop doing yearly releases because the fans will eat it up every single time. When you rush the developers they won’t have time to make an actual good product.
MW3(new one) makes (as much as Vanguard) COD WW2 look like a Masterpiece of a game...
seeing people still put MW3 up on top of "best modern COD games" because of muh movement and shit that only sweats care about when there is so much shit piled on MW3 is really telling
It's funny because it's still possible to move in MWII, but it _actually_ requires skill instead of sped up animations that now look janky because they were not meant to be that speed.
I’ll never understand why this is so hard for activision to understand. You have 3 studios who all do 1 thing really well(or at least pretty well) Infinity Ward usually has fun campaigns, SHG usually does pretty good MP, and Treyarch crushes zombies. Just have those 3 teams focus on their strengths. Then have the other studios support as needed. Problem is Warzone has bled in and ruined everything. Campaign is naw Warzone. Zombies is now Warzone. Everything is about Warzone. I’m so happy battle royale games are finally dying out. What a terrible terrible fad
I think Treyarch crushes both Campaign and Zombies together. IW needs to be taken out the picture entirely, they are killing COD slowly but surely with this boring tacticool stuff. I absolutely agree with what you say of Warzone for sure though, that was an irreversible decline for COD
@@samuelwalker3688 it's not the same treyarch that did the bo 1,2 and waw campaign
Bo3 was horrible
Bo4 didin't even have one
Bo cold war was solid but it was more raven than treyarch
With zombies i agree they are the best
This MW (Reboot) trilogy feels like the Blade film trilogy. The first entry being solid, the second entry being flawed, but fun, and the last one being trash.
just like The Matrix
@@mattmark94Pretty much
I want to see a cod campaign with like low poly models instead of realistic ones.
I stopped purchasing COD games like ages ago, but I recently got to try that MW2 reboot with a roommate at their place which is serving as an emergency shelter to us atm (after a good chunk of our apartment burned down in an arsen attempt, dont mind the deets).
There was no version 1.0 patch on the disc, we had to download 77 Gigs with our sluggish connection, just to play offline. First strike!
Then, we realised that it installed MW3 (which we don't even own), and we had to install MW2 as a DLC. What the hell? Second strike, that's disgusting!
Then the game tried to lock us out of offline play, unless I created an Activision account (when playing the PS4 Version by the way), I had to kill the internet to dodge that requirement. Third strike, Activision is out.
I don’t care how good COD is anymore, MW2 received 0 actual updates and no changes asked by the community. Just to surprise us with a 70€ upgrade this year that features most things we asked for. I feel like a complete idiot coming back to COD since BO3
I abandoned CoD when bo4 dropped. As a zombies players what they did to the mode was disgusting. I didn't buy another game until this year when I bought CW on sale 😂. Mw2019 and MW2 looked good but not enough to make me wanna buy them.
@@Shirohige4yonko I mean, they removed a ton of maps and modes and features in favor of a now defunct WZ in 2019. You're objectively getting less of a game now than you would've back in S5 of its own respective life cycle.
@@scottjs5207 and that's why I didn't get either one of them. And CW I got in a sale event.
Try cod mobile
@@scottjs5207S5 and S6 in ME Warzone was Peak as Fck
Feeling sad for sledgehammer devs, all of their creative freedom taken away, being continuously forced to make the games for whichthey don't have any vision yet they get all the hate from community
True, somehow i feel sorry for them, thats pure injustice but actually the community doesnt know better. They believe devs make decision and embed it into the game while we know that this is not true, there is always the management above that knocks on the door
Why are you feeling bad for sledgehammer they're the same goofballs who made Vanguard and that boring world War II call of duty in 2017.
@@pp3k3jamail and guess what, they were forced to make those games, they had neither any vision nor any time for those games
@@amalo.vergaming4605they made aw though and were the forced to make ww2 or make vanguard that unrealistic?
@@Deathmare235 yeah AW is the only game they made with passion, since then they're literally being treated as support studio, they were forced to cancel aw2 and make ww2, and they didn't even have any plan for making vanguard but Activision forced them to make it
Give sledgehammer free reign? You know what happens when they have free reign? Vanguard. Hell when have they ever made a good cod?
They butchered every game they've touched just about, Advanced Warfare was forgettable, WWII was boring, and Vanguard was just atrocious. They were supposed to develop Cold War but they couldn't get along with Raven Software long enough to finish the game in the deadline limit so they got demoted as lead developers and poor Treyarch got dragged by their ankles into finishing it.
Coming from an MP only player, I quite liked AW. Most dynamic COD movement AFAIK. Wasn't really into most of the guns in the game though
@@kenzieuchiha1191Advanced Warfare was the best futuristic CoD.
@@hennibsdp9528 Are we forgetting Infinite Warfare...?
At least from a campaign standpoint.
@@kenzieuchiha1191the worst part is they made rumours that it was Treyarch’s fault somehow also they’re bad people in general, their hr department is a cover up
Im surprised that MWIII didn't get the Infinity Warfare treatment and came with a remaster of MW3.
I've always stood by the notion of "If your source material is terrible, then whatever you make from it will be terrible" and the fact the MW3 remake is as bad as the original MW3 is *chef's kiss* lol.
If your game is good enough, time between release and DLC won’t even matter. Elden Ring’s DLC is dropping 2.5 years after release. People still by the latest op’s in Siege’s 9th year! Just make an enjoyable and ever changing game and people will stick around.
Exactly what I'm saying. Chop threw unnecessary shade at a game being a year old. 😂 brother, my game library looks like a decade old time capsule outside of Elden Ring.
I've said numerous times with my friends, that the only thing that would bring me back is a faithful BO2 remaster. But I gotta be honest, I'm not even sure if that would be enough. CoD just needs to end or take a brake or something. Which will never happen because Activision likes money too much. This franchise is dead. Yes, it still makes money and people are still playing it, but CoD as we knew it and what we once loved is dead. I'm dont trying to hold out faith for a return to form and for it to return to it's roots.
if you ever feel bad just remember people paid for this garbage game 😂
I paid for it and love it brings back memories in hd
@@Couchgamer434 you're a loser
I didn't buy the game but I do feel bad for the friend who bought it for me(they bought it twice)
mw3 is better then mw2 but it should've been free dlc for mw2 owners after the how much of a scam mw2 was.
lmaoo. i wanted to buy it, but after this video and all the comments there's no fking way I'd spend money on this shit 😂
The reason they can’t bring back the pick 10 system is cause they can’t sell blueprints with a million different grips and stocks
Same reason we can't have Factions.
It’s not the attachments people are buying, it’s the weapon skin. And from what I’ve heard the pick 10 system is coming back for CoD 2025.
Every time you said "Marvel movie post credit scene" it made me laugh.🤣
This is old news, the people who bought this game are an embarrassment.
bought the game and instantly regretted it like post clarity, played it for 4 days then dropped it, didn't even play campaign
*The Community got so consumed and amazed by the movement in MWIII2023* , they failed to see how terrible and inconsistent the game is and the *Multiplayer the gold standard of COD is no longer the primary focus of the game* as it should be ,Automatic disbanding of lobbies nobody ask for that, there a button you press to back out. The game is fast & insane pace but the *RELOADING IS SLOW AND CLUNKY, NO Slight of Hand, Fast Reload, Hustle* , the Snipers are slow and inconsistent gunnfights and hit detection.
The MWII2022 movement was intentionally made different just to improve it the next game to keep players in the *Money Matrix*
The hate on MW3 2011 is honestly blasphemous.
MW3 2011 is everything MW2 2009 wishes it was. The more balanced modern warfare that has more features, better and balanced perks/weapons, better camos, better maps, better everything really. Enev the campaign. MW3 2011 had a better MP than MW2 2009, BO2, BO1, WAW, Ghosts, and every other CoD besides BO3 and MW 2019.
You were good until you said it was better than black ops 1 the maps sucked ass tbh on mw3 and stiff movement looked weird
I know right 😂exactly lmfao mw3 is the best infinity ward game ever made but brain dead dick riders just glaze mw2 constantly just because everyone else on the internet does lmfao
@@sdfvmbshdbgsdbv you're smoking crack lmfao mw3 has the best maps and it had the best mechanics
This is a $30 expansion at most. Even then, it’s still terrible.
The game crashed, and when I booted it up it said that the only way to get back into the game was to "reset my account, including battle pass and all progress". I uninstalled right there
They might as well have just punched you in the gut lol
Hey few months later here, that was a visual bug not an actual crash. One google search would've saved you back then :3
@@Blooky-yl7bo Imagine necro-ing a 3 month old comment to gaslight someone. Crazy.
@@connors3689 it happened to me too and a lot of other people. Even on twitter they confirmed it wouldn't actually reset your stat's
@@Blooky-yl7bo So, I reinstalled this god-awful "game" to verify that I was correct. After installing this 200 GB monstrosity (why the fuck is it 200GB - I'd say ask your engineers to fix it, but goddamn you must only have one intern), I was first greeted with a lovely "update requires restart" screen. After waiting a minute for my freshly reinstalled game to update, I was then greeted by multiple pages asking me to buy the latest battlepass. After several more minutes of struggling through one of the worst UIs I've ever experienced, I have given up trying to figure out where to find my old battle pass progress. The long and short of it is - this overpriced DLC posing as a game game me an error saying that it reset all of my progress. After logging in, I found that my battle pass was entirely wiped, and all of my custom classes and customizations were gone. So yeah, it was a visual bug, as much as any bug is visual in a video game.
Please hire better PR reps for call of duty if you want me to keep playing (I sure hope they are paying you, would be pretty depressing if you were doing this for free), thanks to this I am now motivated to permanently remove it from my steam library!
The og Mw3 killstreak system was awesome. And the killstreaks felt strong. I loved the specialist system too
I just remembered, on the level where you capture Makarov at the stadium and push him around and there’s the mechanic of shoving him 😂 I had lost so much investment in taking the game seriously by that point that I just started goofing off and constantly pushing him around.
The original MW3 was a good game, better than anything made after BO2.
The menus were fuct loading every time you changed modes and all roads lead back to battlepass. I’m out I’m done.
Here in Australia at our version of GameStop this cod was selling for $110, I wouldn’t of even payed half that amount
Why not it’s the best 😂
@@GabrielXDrums Bait used to be believable...
@@OrionDawn15
That's not rage bait, it's sarcasm. Please go touch grass, you seem on edge.
@@PointsofData You don't know that it's sarcasm, is the thing.
*wouldn’t have
I haven't bought MW3. I'm done with COD after MW2 and Vangaurd. Might grab it in a couple years when it's $10 used
Im convinced that people are just pretending to enjoy MWIII for the sole reason that it isnt MWII.
Probably.
DMZ got old super quick. The fact that zombies was just literally DMZ with zombies was so annoying and lame.
the only way I'll buy another COD game is if they make a sequel to Ghosts, I'm still pissed about that cliffhanger.
Also Extinction is kinda cool, it ain't zombies but it's unique. I'd *love* to see that again.
Babe wake up, Chopper uploaded a new review
MW III is like a bland, boring & forgetable remake movie that functions as a cash grab while MW3 is like a Action movie that you would like to have a thrill if you want to escape from reality.
The original Modern Warfare trilogy is the Star Wars of modern gaming, it basically invented modern gaming as we know it alongside Black Ops 1 & 2 while being arguably the biggest epic you could get at that time that wasn't locked down to one specific console but instead spread across gaming as a whole to become mainstream and set a universal standard.
This Video made me delete the game for the 5th time
One major element you left out about the multiplayer is the sheer amount of post-launch support Sledgehammer had provided for the game. It's the most we've ever seen. Not only in terms of seasonal content like maps & guns, but there's also always a mini event active where you can do challenges for exclusive camos, plus there are weekly challanges you can do that often grant another great feature: Aftermarket Parts, which are attachments that essentially turn existing guns into whole new, unique weapons. As someone who goes for the mastery camo, then retires to Search & Destroy every year, it's incredibly refreshing to always have something new and uniqe to try that fundamentally changes up how I approach the game.
I can see the good in MWII. It was its own thing. Same with Vanguard. MWIII is just "Hey, I heard you like Warzone."
Also MW3 (2011) definitely isn't perfect either, but I know everyone who plays it remembers "All warfare is based on deception".
The return of graves and shepherd was super confusing to me too, but when I did some research it turns out that he was brought back in warzone 2 please make a video about their attempts at driving the story through warzone without considering players who mainly play campaign or normal multiplayer 🙏🙏
Desperate attempts to adhere to The Disney Marvel plan. They say "you don't need to play the other game/watch the pay-wall shows..." but then they bring back or majorly change characters in random off-shoot scenes buried in niche content.
Technically with Echo 3-1, those scenes were locked behind Raids. Meaning you had to buy MW2, wait in a matchmaking lobby for 30 minutes, and play these bunk missions hardly anyone wanted to run. I can't even recall when Graves came back but i recall the studio just quoting the internet in a half-assed line of dialogue. "Oh, i wasn't in the tank..." *next subject.* 😂 it's pathetic attempts at plot twists and fan service.
@RecluseBootsy Funny you mention the Magic Empire, as the original Modern Warfare Trilogy was the Star Wars of modern gaming until Hacktivision butchered it.