WOTM: The Bar Hits Infinitely Low, Part III
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 кві 2024
- In this look at Low Bar Bill's defense of genocide, Bill assures us that no one had to die. Indeed, no one even had to stop being extremely evil!
For ad-free videos, become a patron at...
/ mrdeity
For one-time donations...
venmo.com/BrianKeithDalton
or simply @BrianKeithDalton on the Venmo app
paypal.me/MrDeity
Or use the tip jar on my channel page:
/ misterdeity
To purchase my kindle e-book called, "Atheist Fundamentalist":
www.amazon.com/Atheist-Fundam...
Other links...
/ mrdeity
/ mrdeity
www.skeptic.com
Due to the nature of this content, I'm unable to monetize these this series of videos, so anything you can do to help out will be greatly appreciated. I also want to apologize for the somewhat lackluster performance. I've been suffering severe back pain with two slipped disked. On the upside, since the content keeps these videos from monetization, I've left in the harsh language - which I know you'll all enjoy!
We’re the canninite babies left behind a threat??“ Resistance is futile: our diapers R loaded?”
And people believe him ...... I want to ask why but I think no one knows the answer
Bullshit Lane Craig should be his name.
Thanks!
6:56
Thanks!
Yes English is not my first language and I understand why sometimes is hard to read my comments due to the fact that most of the time I do not care much about my grammar when I write UA-cam comments also grammar and writing are not one of my skills.
So Craig basically asserted that we do NOT get morality from god and that good and evil does not exist in this world because the notions do not come from god, there are only commands which we must judge as good or bad on our own. Dawkins is then right when he says good and evil do not exist.
By the way, did this guy ever read the definition of genocide? And it is not merely an academic term with some people discussing the width of the term, there is a relatively narrow definition in a convention on prevention of the crime of genocide.`
I got say as a Christian one of the things that do not like about William Laing Craig is that he makes many of his points or biblical teachings based on probabilities, possibilities or or assumptions, the problem with this is that we are not to think more than what it’s written(Bible) so if you don’t know than you don’t know simple like that. One of issues that I saw with William here was that he compare a moral obligation to a legal obligation, one of the issues that I saw in this video was also that you keep mentioning that God commits murder but you never give what is the objective definition of murder, also same with genocide, also if your going to imply that it was evil for God to do those things than give me the one true answer to why he choose to end the life of the innocent and why he simply could not do it another way and since you are an atheists I expect you to give me actual proof or at least SUFFIENT EVIDENCE the demonstrates or explains why it was evil for God to do so. Also if your implication is that there is obsolutely nothing no morally sufficient reason for God to have for taking or commanding the killing of innocent human beings than where is your PROOF other wise seems more like what you believe is because of faith or just nothing more and both less than your personal opinion which is based of feelings and your phycological state of mind.
Thanks!
"When the deity does it, that means it's not immoral."
Funnily enough, the people who need to watch, listen, and understand this are those who probably never will.
"Other tragedies with a strong F sound..."
I'm pretty sure that Bill has definitively stated here that his god has no morals.
For being good god has a hell of a body count
Theists still respect genocide-defending Low Bar Bill, even after this brainless, slave-like, immoral nonsense. They still respect him... smh.
How evil were the Canaanites? The abominations that LBB read were identical or comparable to those that the Abrahamic God ordered:
To me it seems clear that WLC hasn't had pushback from his target Christian audience and now feels free to say anything so long as he can tell himself it's rational.