I don't think the GPX 2 is a waste of money, if it's your first mouse. But going from gpx to v2 doesn't feel worth it. The changes are good but still very minor.
@@hoecage8781 4k polling is not better feature.... Its just selling number at this point same was dpi 10-15 years ago...... But again some ppl like Logitech products.....and techonlogy of mices is probably as good as it will get in terms what humans can feel or detect and also lot of people didnt want big changes in Superlight especially pro players.....there is reason some ppl continue to buy let say BMW although there are othet car manufacturers that give more "technology" for same or lower price..... Me personally I would never buy Lamzu
100% incorrect. The side switches may be the same original pieces but they’re more solid, the switches are much much more responsive especially for fps games. The 60 gram mark is absolutely perfect for me. 2k sensor feels so much more responsive. It’s a hugeee upgrade if you’re actually competitive and care about the feeling and responsiveness of your mouse. It’s a much better experience for people who play very competitively.
What happened to my counter strike we recommending razer products now? 🤢 go get you a Zowie like god intended. Steelseries if you need to be a hipster. Do not buy overpriced Dell garbage
yeah i bought the superlight 2 last month. my last mouse was a $15 g102 and i wanted to buy an actual good mouse so instead of getting the normal superlight i got the new one
I own a dav3 faker edition a lamzu Atlantis and have owned the original superlight, pulsar v2mini and viper v2 pro and I'll say shape is king. There's something that feels good about to superlight 2 shape for me. I'm also on a glass skypad so the slow stock skates don't really affect me. I perform good with all my mouse really it just comes down to shape preference I'd say. I really rarely notice a different between 1k and 2k polling.
Idk what the big deal is. The biggest issue imo was the double clicking. If they can fix that and scroll wheel issues that appear after a few years of bhopping in cs (which is why mine broke) I think this is a great upgrade. The design is timeless. And if we’re being honest most people are going to get aftermarket mouse skates anyways. Honestly I never had a problem with the mouse feet but thats just me. What more can we ask for. I think small changes are realistically what we can expect from a mouse that is near perfect
@@RealTaIk Well "real talk" - I would say it's obviously sad that they can't add better stock skates to a mouse in this price range. That being said, most people who are seriously into it will. And a mouse with this kind of price tag is catered to those people. But what OP wrote is correct, timeless design and with a near perfect mouse (I used the OG superlight for 2 years so far) it's hard to imagine them changing the whole thing and making a completely different mouse
@@Trickzyy Kinda funny that you call something "obvious" while you clearly never had anything to do with people who buy that stuff. I worked in a electronics store in which we sold high end gamer peripherals and I can tell you that most people don't have any idea of what they are buying.
I've used my superlight for 3 years now and recently noticed my scroll wheel started to feel scratchy and my side buttons don't always register the clicks. I think the Superlight 2 is worth it because now you have the option "lift off distance" and the optical switches, which is enough for me.
ive had my gpx for about 1.5ish years, and i have no issues with it yet but realistically if i start seeing issues the gpx2 or gpx3 if its out then is probaly where ill go sense the gpro shape fits my hand perfectly
@@TheEregosCS2 is on an entirely new engine. Overwatch 2 is on the same as overwatch 1. If you put CS2 on high settings for spectator purposes it almost looks like an entirely different game especially if you look just at the maps particularly the older maps with no game play. If you compare CSGO beta with CS2 beta they are completely different worlds.
i feel like a lot of gaming mice try their hardest to add as many superfluous features as they can to trick gamers into thinking they're some mouse connoisseurs, when in reality it's likely more placebo than not.
Sad part on Logi part. I got a GPX Superlight 2 and found paired with Powerplay pad the mouse can only do 1000 Hz rate, contacted support, and they told me the PP needs a firmware update that is not in the works. So if you plan on using the 2000 Hz, you can't use PP mouse pad.
Just get a good smooth mouse and some fresh skates made out of glass and boom you’re good. Pp mousepad makes no sense the mouse goes from 0% to 100% in like 10 mins
@@GlobalEl1te skates out of glass is horrible for every tactical shooter. Don't give recommendations to people when you don't know what they are playing.
"Worked with 100 pros", means they asked 100 pros for feedback, most of which was ignored by the techs and the rest of which was ignored by the executives.
I saw that almost nothing changed with the superlight 2 and picked up a Deathadder V3 Pro instead. Absolutely love this mouse. Its light, 0 input lag, fits my hand perfectly, long battery life, and USB-C. Highly recommend it to anyone looking for a new wireless mouse. Do not give Logitech your money for practically rereleasing the same product.
@@HeK.and none of that makes any difference in comparison to the original superlight. I have the original one and I dont see a reason to spend more than what i spent on the original one to get nothing in return
@@HeK. usb-c should've been included in the original GPX, "new" optical switches for mice had been done and done well by other companies as well. 2k sensor is just them inflating what is barely noticeable especially in modern competitive video games much like how every company inflates other specs of their mice. Like what op said, NOTHING CHANGED
@@Drewbertttt i mean, what did you guys expect? sure, they could've improved the side buttons. but the first superlight was almost perfect. so why change the formular for the best selling mouse of all time? nobody cares about stock skates anyway and replacing them with corepads. 2k is more than enough for 99% of the customers and the optical switches seem to be better than razer's. the price will drop in a few months and if your old gpx dies or starts double clicking, you'll be happy that a newer updated version exists on the market.
A lot of the positive points mentioned come from the fact that the mouse is simply new and therefore certain parts, such as the srcoll wheel and battery life, are simply in better condition.
Guys. The 'G Pro' is basically a G203 with a HERO sensor, so it's not just wired, but has a totally different shape. What you are refering to is 'G Pro Wireless'.
@@mmmmm1010 Except people who actually know their stuff regarding computer mice. I mean, seriously, the two mice could hardly be more different. The same thing with DPI. Printers and scanners have DPI (Dots Per Inch). Mouse sensors have CPI (Counts Per Inch) to determine resolution. The former is the more widely known, but it's wrong. Tbh I'm not a fan of propagating incorrect technical terms. It's misleading and not nice, especially if you have a huge audience. Let's not teach bs to the masses; the more educated the people are, the less crap manufacturers can get away with! : >
@@zatozatoichi7920 I know my stuff and i dont use full model names whenever i talk about mice. Its redundant to use full names unless specifically talking about the older mice. No one thinks of the wired g pro when they hear "g pro" because no one should think of it in the context of current mice. Same reason that no one thinks of the first deathadder released almost 20 years ago when they hear "Deathadder"
@@mmmmm1010 I think you are mostly interacting with Gen Z then and/or you don't talk about mice that much with people, for years and years on. My point still stands. Inaccurate technical stuff is lazy, unless you like guessing. If you say, 'DeathAdder', I'll ask which one? Because there're quite a few, and there're not small differences between some of them, so that's the sensible question. The last two doesn't even have the same shape as the old ones. Why won't we spare ourselves a round, and being exact in the first place?
I had a Corsair Sabre RGB Wireless that broke after 6 months and the Customer support was terrible. By chance I found a great deal in a small electronics store for a G Pro Wireless. And what can I say. That mouse is basically perfect. The buttons are satisfying to click, it operates smoothly, great battery life ( wireless ftw ) , feels very good in my hand, and so on and so forth. I know it's not the Superlight ( hella expensive ) but just as general feedback , the G Pro Wireless is a really good mouse which already netted me better gaming performance. And for 85€ it also was a really neat price.
I just bought the Superlight 2 after using the Razer DeathAdder from 2008 to 2024! I decided to make the switch because the left button stopped working. While considering a new mouse, I was torn between the Razer DeathAdder V3 Pro and the Superlight 2. After reading and watching several videos, I finally decided to go for the Superlight 2. I play a lot of MMO and FPS games, so I'm hoping for a great wireless mouse experience!
Ive got the regular G Pro Wireless and have had it for about 3years or more and i need to replace it as the side button has been dodgy for a while now where when i hold it down its not holding down in game.. ( not sure werther to just buy another for £70 or get this for £150)
Unpopular opinion, mouse reviewers are average at gaming, if the pros use it by plugging and play, you have no excuse. The player makes the mouse not the other way…
this is true but a good mouse for you does wonders and this is what the job of a reviewer is it's to help choose which will be best for you both money wise and playstyle wise. Almost any mouse will be good nowadays but the reason reviewers complain about 2k and not 4k is bc 4k is better and they want the product to be at the best it could possibly be, sure you can play well with 2k and 1k but a top of the line brand should have atleast 4k by now (considering every other brand is going for it and they're already a year late) and bc they use almost everything on the market they're able to say where certain mice are better or which one feels better in x department. Shape is the most important thing though so the mouse being 2k or 4k shouldn't be your main thing but most of the g pro x 2 hate is just it's a good mouse but could be better for the price bc of the long wait and the fact that the superlight 1 already exists which still holds its own against 4k mice so the 2 isn't really a good purchase unless you dont have a superlight 1. Reviewers are trying to get the most bang for your buck and the best mouse for you in your hands they care mostly about how the mouse compares and not if it would be usable since almost every mouse is atleast usable even at the top level nowadays
what you said is literally just common sense though. good players can make the most out of anything but they want to optimize their strengths by choosing what's best for them. most reviewers always say that shape is king, but that doesn't mean that reviewers won't be objective in their thoughts about a certain device. these videos are made for consumers and consumers want what's worth their money and what they should expect upon purchasing a product.
I just got back into playing FPS games with the release of CS2. I've been using a G502X but felt like it may not be the best for this game (no pro uses the G502) and I've never owned a GPX before so I felt like for me, it may be worth picking one up.
I have my GPX Superlight v2 and have been using it over the last few days. It's much more comfortable than my G502X and I improved my highscore on YPRAC 360 Aim Test map from 29 to 32 indicating that I can actually aim much better with it.
As someone who own all the best mouse on earth No I do not recommend it at all, what I would recommend is for you to measure your hand and I can tell you your perfect mouse for now but if you don’t want to measure your hand then I would recommend checking out xm1we, sora 4k, deathadder v3 pro, viper v2 pro and atlantis/mini (I main htx ace)
Does anyone know if you set the G HUB to optical only and delete it while keeping Onboard Memory Manager on PC does the mouse switch back to hybrid or stays at optical settings ?
Problem with ppl is that they want better mouse every year from every company and truth is we already have that in terms of technology its just shapes and weight which is personal preferance......in the end we as humans have biological limits
I got the normal g pro wireless but wanna get a superlight now and idk which one to get D: 1 or 2 people trash on 2 so hard and its more expensive so do i just get the first one?
As a person who owned 3 superlights, I am obviously upgrading just for USB-C, since at this point it is the only device on my table without universal connector
Do you think this is worth the upgrade from a glorious model o wired? I am able to get this mouse for 80 dollars brand new right now, do you guys think it’s worth the 80 dollars ?
I like the v2, the battery came loose in my v1 simply from playing with low sens for about an hour daily for a year, I like the new software options and indeed the hardware too, the side buttons are meh but whatever.
Do you mean Deathadder V3, the direct competitor of GPX2? Many players rate them similarly, in the end, it was down to which shape fits their palms better. I'd go for a GPX2. The shape suits me better. Additionally, I have a policy to stay away from companies that market many gimmick features. In this case, Deathadder V3's excessive high polling rate. Of course, you can turn it off. But the real problem is that, companies do that usually come with hidden issues. The loud marketing serves as a distraction.
Last 10 years I played with my Razer DeathAdder Chroma, and now I want to replace the old mouse with G Pro X Superlight or Razer DeathAdder v3. Palm grip. Your recommendations?
I can't speak to the longevity of the GPX-SL2 yet, but I dropped Razer after having gone through 5 mice in around 10 years. I have consistently suffered issues with their mice click outright failing on me, and connectivity issues on my last Razer product just finally pushed me over the edge. Picked up a GPX-SL2 on Sunday, if it lasts 3-4 years it will have been well worth it IMO. The stats for my Razer products - DeathAdder 2014 - Back Button Clicked in one day and would never click back out (2 Years) DeathAdder 2016 - Main Mouse Click began missing clicks (2 Years) DeathAdder 2018 - USB connection became intermittent (3 Years) NagaHex V2 2021 - USB connection completely failed (2 Years) Basalisk Pro 2023 - Wake from sleep took up to 1 minute intermittently, Battery would require reseating intermittently to reconnect to PC (9 months) Razer makes some comfortable mice, but their track record IMHO for building a product that lasts... Well, let's just see if Logitech can do better. I also really appreciate that the GPX-SL2 looks like a mouse and not some bizarre spaceship. It looks like it could belong on the main stage of a pro tournament, or in the office, ready to crank out some high intensity spreadsheets.
@@HeK.people expected them to push the market like they did with the gpx release or at the very least match razer at 4k. They're already a year late on 4k so this is just disappointing for many
@@jerryyy. 99.9% of customers don't care about 4k. 2k or even 1k will be enough for the next 10 years. it's a gimmick for mouse enthusiasts. stop harassing me.
@@HeK. 4k isnt needed by any means but it's called the PRO for a reason it's aimed at that 0.1% AND is their flagship their oooo here's what we can do mouse. It should be top of the line, it's not a gimmick if it works bro. Plus nobody said 1k or 2k wont work in 10 years but if they're pricing it at the same price of the competition it's expected to compete, they could've and should've done better considering they were already late to 4k by a year, even though their 2k implementation is very very good and the mouse is overall good they could've 100% made the best mouse on the market both on paper with raw stats and in feel bc logitech sensors do usually just feel way more responsive
@@jerryyy. It's obviously not aimed at the 0.1% lol. the main customer base of this mouse is the casual gamer dad or the 13 year old kid with a 60-144hz monitor who can't even benefit from 4k. logitech wants to make money. aiming at the 0.1% would be a dumb business decision. it's called "pro" for marketing reasons.
The problem with this review is that his used gpro isnt indecative of new changes i switched to and from same mouse and noticed the things hes noticing "scrolling" the "click feel"
I recently gave my GPX1 to my kid and bought the GPX2 and really like it. The shape is perfect and the switches are really nice too. As for the sensor and all that, I can't tell a difference. I don't care about 4K and still keep mine on 1K and I couldn't care less about USB-C vs micro-USB. I do think $160 is a ridiculous price for these but I do love this thing and it is my new all time favorite gaming mouse.
superlight is just a good safe mouse in all versions. the way i see it is if u have a superlight 1 and its still working well then keep it. basically upgrade when needed . on the other hand razer viper v2 pro vs v3 pro is a massive change and well worth the money even if your v2 is still working. logitech doesnt push the barriers on tech anymore theyve had 2 ceos since theyve made a groundbreaking popular item aka the first superlight. they do deserve some credit though because they kind of created the modern standards for mice and the superlight 1 is still very usable today its not outdated which other mice have come and gone in no longer than 2 years generally. im a razer viper v3 pro and deathadder v3 hyperspeed lover nowadays but i still pickup my superlight somewhat often because if i want to use something different the gpro is always a safe choice. im waffling to no one so ill shut up now lol
Functionally not much. The latency should be about the same because it's still digital serial communication, but USBC has really become a standard connector and using that instead of stupid micro USB makes sense for a new product.
@@zanemcmorris4541 For a mouse USB-C means one thing over USB Micro, Longevity. The GPX-SL2 having a USB-C means it will survive FAR more plug and unplug cycles than a USB Micro connection. That honestly seems to be the major theme for this mouse. Optical Switches = Longer Product Life, USB-C = Longer Product Life, the only change they made that isn't going to result directly in the mouse lasting longer is the sensor, which will still indirectly contribute to a longer use since it is still better hardware with more modern (if not current) specs.
Gonna upgrade from gpx to gpx 2 because it has usb c. All my devices, literally all, charge with usb c. I just hold a shitty micro usb cable to charge my gpx. Saw many tests online, done with professional gear in controlled environment, and 1k pooling vs 2k and up is not worth the battery life.
Upgrading from a superlight 1 to superlight 2 doesn't make sense, however if I were to go back in time before I got my gpx I'd probably get the 2 since you know it's just better slightly
the skatez are made for the Logitech hard mousepad but they are dogshit and already starting to worn out after a few days the standard skatez are totally ok on my skypad3.0 glass mousepad but i will change them as soon as they start to worn out
the good thing about it is that the original gpx got way more accessible thanks to the price drop, got one for myself recently and it feels incredible, easily the best mouse ive ever had
@@shiion6711 i had been using the deathadder elite for about 5 years, i was hesitant on switching at first bc i thought i wouldnt like the shape, i had to switch from palm to claw grip but i can confidently say after having had it for a while the shape is a perfect fit and way more comfortable than the da ever was
do people actually care about 4k or even 2k polling rate? just sounds like marketing BS consdering people are noticing diminishing returns at monitor refresh rates as low as 240-360hz... and I'd argue monitor refresh rate is MORE important than mouse polling rate (especially since virtually all mice have at LEAST 1k polling rate these days)
It's so weird to me hearing everyone saying that this mouse release is "mid" when the original GPX-SL was considered the gold standard. All of the complaints about the original were related to 3 things. No USB-C, double clicking from wear on the switches, and 1k polling. The GPX-SL2 has literally fixed all of these, and while it lacks 4k+ on the poling it is also looking like, with more and more testing being done, that consistently 4k+ poling is just marketing at the moment. The difference is almost negligible, and it can cause consistency issues for low to mid tier hardware. I could understand if you have a GPX-SL that works, looking at this and saying "nah not worth upgrading right now", but I also think if you are the type of person who either values a universal connector, or who loved their GPX-SL and is starting to suffer from double click issues, this is a no brainier upgrade. I just don't think it makes sense to look a the original, call it the gold standard, receive an objective upgrade to the platform in all of the places where the original was lacking, and then say it is only an okay mouse. (Not that this review did that exactly, but it seems to be a pretty consistent sentiment online right now.)
Very safe shape for first timers, but Id go something along the lines of what your grip wants. To me its definitely not worth it when other mice offer less with the same shape.
The shape would have been so much better if they add deeper comfort grove or narrow indent side and it would actually fit 99% of people, Razer and some other companies have been doing X&Y for years(no one use it tbh), the best mouse feet design was on the old g pro wireless and the mouse feet is the worst mouse feet on a premium mouse even worst than g wolves but I actually like the fact it can do 2000hz with just a normal dongle and trust me no one can see a different between 2k and 4Khz The switches now need much more force to press in and the side buttons didn’t change so I would recommend the gpx1 over 2 (Main htx ace)
now hear me out because this take might be a little bit rough to comprehend it BUT its the truth what they did with superlight 2 SHOULD HAVE BEEN with superlight OG, for a mouse that costs a fortune should be in any aspect of it literally PERFECT i used the OG superlight for like 2 months back in 2021 and the double clicks just made me sell it and get myself a viper pro which evendually i upgraded to Viper V2 now i dont worship razer simply because their products tend to be overpriced for no reason at all BUT when it comes to mice bro i never ever had a problem while using razer mice from 2013 to this very day I cant trust logitech after that move honestly (speaking for their mice products specifically)
I would just get it because it has usb c but I will have to wait. I got my Superlight 1 used for 55€. But I'm so dump I'll probably pay too much money to get rid of the last micro usb cabel.
After 2 years the sensor of my old superlight starts to drift randomly, it's quite strange that they released the superlight 2 at the same time, sorry logitech but it smells of cheating here, I bought the razer instead. I also warn against the white version of the mouse, after some time it leaves nasty discolorations in the place where you hold the mouse, which cannot be removed and has nothing to do with personal hygiene.
I really love the superlight, but the mouse wheel is just the biggest trash ever. It always breaks after around 1 year and feels really bad afterwards. Happened to every single one of my 4 superlights. Sad they didn't change anything on the wheel.
I have the normal gpro, and I'm planning on upgrading to the new superlight. The weight seems perfect to me tbh, not as heavy as normal gpro and not too light like some of the newer mice out now.
I feel like they should honey comb under the feet and try to squeeze some extra weight out of it, type C is big step but superlight should've had it anyways. I just want them to make a lighter weight g900/g903 insanely fun mice that are great all-rounders, just a lil too heavy nowadays.
It's more like a refresh than an actual new version. I doubt a human can register the difference between 4k or 2k polling. I'd rather save the power needed for the difference and have a longer lasting battery. Price is to high. I bought the Superlight for 80 bucks and I don't see myself spending more for a mouse with average weight and features.
They should just take the Original GPX off the market and release the GPX2 at the same price point. Currently it goes for 170 euros in my country which is way overpriced. I'd rather spend 30 more and get the new Finalmouse
the lamzu thorn is literally 90% as good and is half the price. Only actual professionals should be buying the sl2 imo, there are just so many simply better options.
It’s not. Wireless tech just isn’t ready for that yet. I got the viper v2 pro as well as the viper 8k and wireless 4K vs real 4K is day and night difference
for anyone that has the Superlight 2... corepad has released skates for the mouse. They are MILES ahead of the stock skates and are pretty much needed.
roasting another Logitech mice when it's a same price, and intended to be an upgraded model; while Zowie is making worst refresh of all gaming mice like EC2-cw for worse spec and higher price? yeah, this video is biased AF (Context: Dimitri is Zowie mice fanboy.) this is not the first time when this media opinion is Bias. it happened before on Logitech GPX (they keep slandering it) vs viper v2. look at them now, Viper v2 users just keep decreasing, in both casuals or pro scenes. I see where this media going, they keep exploiting any Logitech product weaknesses and keep fanboying Razer and Zowie. this media will not be getting any gaming brand sponsor any soon.
I don't think the GPX 2 is a waste of money, if it's your first mouse. But going from gpx to v2 doesn't feel worth it. The changes are good but still very minor.
i came from g502 Lightspeed. Superhappy
tons of better options like lamzu atlantis
@@hoecage8781 there is no tons of better options......in the end its all down to personal preference
@@ernestfrigelj2876 sure but when other companies clone your shape then give better features like 4k polling then its objectively worse
@@hoecage8781 4k polling is not better feature.... Its just selling number at this point same was dpi 10-15 years ago...... But again some ppl like Logitech products.....and techonlogy of mices is probably as good as it will get in terms what humans can feel or detect and also lot of people didnt want big changes in Superlight especially pro players.....there is reason some ppl continue to buy let say BMW although there are othet car manufacturers that give more "technology" for same or lower price..... Me personally I would never buy Lamzu
honestly the superlight 2 is literally the same as the orignal superlight. its like apple making a "new" phone every year
The new main switches are a breeeze to use tho
except with usb-c, new 2k sensor and optical switches
@@legendaryz_chI do like the new switch more, but I also think it’s personal preference
wrong
100% incorrect. The side switches may be the same original pieces but they’re more solid, the switches are much much more responsive especially for fps games. The 60 gram mark is absolutely perfect for me. 2k sensor feels so much more responsive. It’s a hugeee upgrade if you’re actually competitive and care about the feeling and responsiveness of your mouse. It’s a much better experience for people who play very competitively.
It’s worth it if you didn’t have a high performance mouse before but if you have DAV3, Viper V2, GPX, then no it’s not
What happened to my counter strike we recommending razer products now? 🤢
go get you a Zowie like god intended. Steelseries if you need to be a hipster. Do not buy overpriced Dell garbage
just recommending whats best @@williamheard8496
yeah i bought the superlight 2 last month. my last mouse was a $15 g102 and i wanted to buy an actual good mouse so instead of getting the normal superlight i got the new one
@@williamheard8496100+ mouse is not worth it. I rather stick to my default office mouse that come with my laptop for free😂
I own a dav3 faker edition a lamzu Atlantis and have owned the original superlight, pulsar v2mini and viper v2 pro and I'll say shape is king. There's something that feels good about to superlight 2 shape for me. I'm also on a glass skypad so the slow stock skates don't really affect me. I perform good with all my mouse really it just comes down to shape preference I'd say. I really rarely notice a different between 1k and 2k polling.
Idk what the big deal is. The biggest issue imo was the double clicking. If they can fix that and scroll wheel issues that appear after a few years of bhopping in cs (which is why mine broke) I think this is a great upgrade. The design is timeless. And if we’re being honest most people are going to get aftermarket mouse skates anyways. Honestly I never had a problem with the mouse feet but thats just me. What more can we ask for. I think small changes are realistically what we can expect from a mouse that is near perfect
no "most" people aren't going for that.
This is exactly true.
@@RealTaIk Well "real talk" - I would say it's obviously sad that they can't add better stock skates to a mouse in this price range. That being said, most people who are seriously into it will. And a mouse with this kind of price tag is catered to those people. But what OP wrote is correct, timeless design and with a near perfect mouse (I used the OG superlight for 2 years so far) it's hard to imagine them changing the whole thing and making a completely different mouse
@@Trickzyy Kinda funny that you call something "obvious" while you clearly never had anything to do with people who buy that stuff. I worked in a electronics store in which we sold high end gamer peripherals and I can tell you that most people don't have any idea of what they are buying.
Literally nobody i know ever buys aftermarket mouse feet
I've used my superlight for 3 years now and recently noticed my scroll wheel started to feel scratchy and my side buttons don't always register the clicks.
I think the Superlight 2 is worth it because now you have the option "lift off distance" and the optical switches, which is enough for me.
ive had my gpx for about 1.5ish years, and i have no issues with it yet but realistically if i start seeing issues the gpx2 or gpx3 if its out then is probaly where ill go sense the gpro shape fits my hand perfectly
Superlight 2 is pretty much like Overwatch 2, looks new and shiny, but it's still the same underneath
So like CS2
except that the superlight 2 doesn't die after a month.
not true lol
@@TheEregosCS2 is on an entirely new engine. Overwatch 2 is on the same as overwatch 1. If you put CS2 on high settings for spectator purposes it almost looks like an entirely different game especially if you look just at the maps particularly the older maps with no game play. If you compare CSGO beta with CS2 beta they are completely different worlds.
@@jakeman025 who asked?
i feel like a lot of gaming mice try their hardest to add as many superfluous features as they can to trick gamers into thinking they're some mouse connoisseurs, when in reality it's likely more placebo than not.
everything is superlight if you are strong enough.
Sad part on Logi part. I got a GPX Superlight 2 and found paired with Powerplay pad the mouse can only do 1000 Hz rate, contacted support, and they told me the PP needs a firmware update that is not in the works. So if you plan on using the 2000 Hz, you can't use PP mouse pad.
That’s tragically bad, worth a refund imo
Judging by the number of Powerplay users out there, not surprised to me lol
Just get a good smooth mouse and some fresh skates made out of glass and boom you’re good.
Pp mousepad makes no sense the mouse goes from 0% to 100% in like 10 mins
@@GlobalEl1te skates out of glass is horrible for every tactical shooter. Don't give recommendations to people when you don't know what they are playing.
"Worked with 100 pros", means they asked 100 pros for feedback, most of which was ignored by the techs and the rest of which was ignored by the executives.
source?
I wish they would make an updated regular G Pro so we can have the two extra side buttons.
I wish they would make a g703 super light
your wish came true lmao
I saw that almost nothing changed with the superlight 2 and picked up a Deathadder V3 Pro instead. Absolutely love this mouse. Its light, 0 input lag, fits my hand perfectly, long battery life, and USB-C. Highly recommend it to anyone looking for a new wireless mouse. Do not give Logitech your money for practically rereleasing the same product.
usb-c, new hero 2k sensor, new optical switches = almost nothing
@@HeK.and none of that makes any difference in comparison to the original superlight. I have the original one and I dont see a reason to spend more than what i spent on the original one to get nothing in return
@@HeK.99.9% of people will not notice the new sensor or optical switches. If you have an original superlight, there is no reason to upgrade.
@@HeK. usb-c should've been included in the original GPX, "new" optical switches for mice had been done and done well by other companies as well. 2k sensor is just them inflating what is barely noticeable especially in modern competitive video games much like how every company inflates other specs of their mice. Like what op said, NOTHING CHANGED
@@Drewbertttt i mean, what did you guys expect? sure, they could've improved the side buttons. but the first superlight was almost perfect. so why change the formular for the best selling mouse of all time?
nobody cares about stock skates anyway and replacing them with corepads. 2k is more than enough for 99% of the customers and the optical switches seem to be better than razer's. the price will drop in a few months and if your old gpx dies or starts double clicking, you'll be happy that a newer updated version exists on the market.
A lot of the positive points mentioned come from the fact that the mouse is simply new and therefore certain parts, such as the srcoll wheel and battery life, are simply in better condition.
That’s very true
7:13 On pulsar webpage it says 1000 hz polling rate for the xh2 .?
That’s a sick Ernie Ball Axis Niall, you continue to have tremendous taste and insight!
Guys. The 'G Pro' is basically a G203 with a HERO sensor, so it's not just wired, but has a totally different shape. What you are refering to is 'G Pro Wireless'.
its actually the g pro x superlight that they're talking about but there aint a single soul on this earth that doesnt call the superlight "g pro"
@@mmmmm1010 Except people who actually know their stuff regarding computer mice. I mean, seriously, the two mice could hardly be more different.
The same thing with DPI. Printers and scanners have DPI (Dots Per Inch). Mouse sensors have CPI (Counts Per Inch) to determine resolution. The former is the more widely known, but it's wrong.
Tbh I'm not a fan of propagating incorrect technical terms. It's misleading and not nice, especially if you have a huge audience. Let's not teach bs to the masses; the more educated the people are, the less crap manufacturers can get away with! : >
@@zatozatoichi7920 I know my stuff and i dont use full model names whenever i talk about mice. Its redundant to use full names unless specifically talking about the older mice. No one thinks of the wired g pro when they hear "g pro" because no one should think of it in the context of current mice. Same reason that no one thinks of the first deathadder released almost 20 years ago when they hear "Deathadder"
@@mmmmm1010 I think you are mostly interacting with Gen Z then and/or you don't talk about mice that much with people, for years and years on. My point still stands. Inaccurate technical stuff is lazy, unless you like guessing.
If you say, 'DeathAdder', I'll ask which one? Because there're quite a few, and there're not small differences between some of them, so that's the sensible question. The last two doesn't even have the same shape as the old ones. Why won't we spare ourselves a round, and being exact in the first place?
@@zatozatoichi7920 its a video on the g pro superlight 2, theres no reason you should be thinking of the wired g pro when they say g pro
I had a Corsair Sabre RGB Wireless that broke after 6 months and the Customer support was terrible.
By chance I found a great deal in a small electronics store for a G Pro Wireless. And what can I say. That mouse is basically perfect.
The buttons are satisfying to click, it operates smoothly, great battery life ( wireless ftw ) , feels very good in my hand, and so on and so forth.
I know it's not the Superlight ( hella expensive ) but just as general feedback , the G Pro Wireless is a really good mouse which already netted me better gaming performance. And for 85€ it also was a really neat price.
I just bought the Superlight 2 after using the Razer DeathAdder from 2008 to 2024! I decided to make the switch because the left button stopped working. While considering a new mouse, I was torn between the Razer DeathAdder V3 Pro and the Superlight 2. After reading and watching several videos, I finally decided to go for the Superlight 2. I play a lot of MMO and FPS games, so I'm hoping for a great wireless mouse experience!
The superlight 1 had problems with its wheel , is superlight 2 the same ? I wanna buy the 2 cuz the superlight 1 has wheel problems
Can anyone help with finding what kind of arm sleeve he uses?
I wanna know too.
Hello and that’s the Pulsar large thumb sleeve!
@@johnrey8728 thank you dear man
Ive got the regular G Pro Wireless and have had it for about 3years or more and i need to replace it as the side button has been dodgy for a while now where when i hold it down its not holding down in game.. ( not sure werther to just buy another for £70 or get this for £150)
Unpopular opinion, mouse reviewers are average at gaming, if the pros use it by plugging and play, you have no excuse. The player makes the mouse not the other way…
this is true but a good mouse for you does wonders and this is what the job of a reviewer is it's to help choose which will be best for you both money wise and playstyle wise. Almost any mouse will be good nowadays but the reason reviewers complain about 2k and not 4k is bc 4k is better and they want the product to be at the best it could possibly be, sure you can play well with 2k and 1k but a top of the line brand should have atleast 4k by now (considering every other brand is going for it and they're already a year late) and bc they use almost everything on the market they're able to say where certain mice are better or which one feels better in x department. Shape is the most important thing though so the mouse being 2k or 4k shouldn't be your main thing but most of the g pro x 2 hate is just it's a good mouse but could be better for the price bc of the long wait and the fact that the superlight 1 already exists which still holds its own against 4k mice so the 2 isn't really a good purchase unless you dont have a superlight 1. Reviewers are trying to get the most bang for your buck and the best mouse for you in your hands they care mostly about how the mouse compares and not if it would be usable since almost every mouse is atleast usable even at the top level nowadays
what you said is literally just common sense though. good players can make the most out of anything but they want to optimize their strengths by choosing what's best for them. most reviewers always say that shape is king, but that doesn't mean that reviewers won't be objective in their thoughts about a certain device. these videos are made for consumers and consumers want what's worth their money and what they should expect upon purchasing a product.
I just got back into playing FPS games with the release of CS2. I've been using a G502X but felt like it may not be the best for this game (no pro uses the G502) and I've never owned a GPX before so I felt like for me, it may be worth picking one up.
go for a x2v2 with the 4k dongle, imo a much better mouse, feet feel solid, side buttons great too, lighter and the stock skates feels good
@@Ottoni174 horrible qc
I have my GPX Superlight v2 and have been using it over the last few days. It's much more comfortable than my G502X and I improved my highscore on YPRAC 360 Aim Test map from 29 to 32 indicating that I can actually aim much better with it.
As someone who own all the best mouse on earth No I do not recommend it at all, what I would recommend is for you to measure your hand and I can tell you your perfect mouse for now but if you don’t want to measure your hand then I would recommend checking out xm1we, sora 4k, deathadder v3 pro, viper v2 pro and atlantis/mini (I main htx ace)
@@HeK.v1 yes v2 no
Does anyone know if you set the G HUB to optical only and delete it while keeping Onboard Memory Manager on PC does the mouse switch back to hybrid or stays at optical settings ?
Problem with ppl is that they want better mouse every year from every company and truth is we already have that in terms of technology its just shapes and weight which is personal preferance......in the end we as humans have biological limits
I have the good old g pro wireless. Is it worth upgrading to one of those superlights?
Yeah
I got the normal g pro wireless but wanna get a superlight now and idk which one to get D: 1 or 2 people trash on 2 so hard and its more expensive so do i just get the first one?
I got the g pro too, did u get 1 or 2?
As a person who owned 3 superlights, I am obviously upgrading just for USB-C, since at this point it is the only device on my table without universal connector
Not everyone has money growing on trees
Do you think this is worth the upgrade from a glorious model o wired? I am able to get this mouse for 80 dollars brand new right now, do you guys think it’s worth the 80 dollars ?
More than 5 years user of G304 here, I then switched to G Pro XS2 and super happy. ❤
I like the v2, the battery came loose in my v1 simply from playing with low sens for about an hour daily for a year, I like the new software options and indeed the hardware too, the side buttons are meh but whatever.
The battery came loose on my gpx2 already😂 (1600dpi 0.112 valorant)
@@shiion6711 It is an easy fix, double sided tape and undo 6 screws.
im confused between gpx 2 and Razer V3 Pro which one will yall suggest ? The razer is also like 50$ cheaper in my country
Do you mean Deathadder V3, the direct competitor of GPX2? Many players rate them similarly, in the end, it was down to which shape fits their palms better. I'd go for a GPX2. The shape suits me better.
Additionally, I have a policy to stay away from companies that market many gimmick features. In this case, Deathadder V3's excessive high polling rate. Of course, you can turn it off. But the real problem is that, companies do that usually come with hidden issues. The loud marketing serves as a distraction.
Last 10 years I played with my Razer DeathAdder Chroma, and now I want to replace the old mouse with G Pro X Superlight or Razer DeathAdder v3. Palm grip. Your recommendations?
I can't speak to the longevity of the GPX-SL2 yet, but I dropped Razer after having gone through 5 mice in around 10 years. I have consistently suffered issues with their mice click outright failing on me, and connectivity issues on my last Razer product just finally pushed me over the edge. Picked up a GPX-SL2 on Sunday, if it lasts 3-4 years it will have been well worth it IMO.
The stats for my Razer products -
DeathAdder 2014 - Back Button Clicked in one day and would never click back out (2 Years)
DeathAdder 2016 - Main Mouse Click began missing clicks (2 Years)
DeathAdder 2018 - USB connection became intermittent (3 Years)
NagaHex V2 2021 - USB connection completely failed (2 Years)
Basalisk Pro 2023 - Wake from sleep took up to 1 minute intermittently, Battery would require reseating intermittently to reconnect to PC (9 months)
Razer makes some comfortable mice, but their track record IMHO for building a product that lasts... Well, let's just see if Logitech can do better. I also really appreciate that the GPX-SL2 looks like a mouse and not some bizarre spaceship. It looks like it could belong on the main stage of a pro tournament, or in the office, ready to crank out some high intensity spreadsheets.
did u expect them to change the shape? then it wouldnt be a gpro superlight anymore.. it would be a different mouse
exactly. idk what people expected.
@@HeK.people expected them to push the market like they did with the gpx release or at the very least match razer at 4k. They're already a year late on 4k so this is just disappointing for many
@@jerryyy. 99.9% of customers don't care about 4k. 2k or even 1k will be enough for the next 10 years. it's a gimmick for mouse enthusiasts. stop harassing me.
@@HeK. 4k isnt needed by any means but it's called the PRO for a reason it's aimed at that 0.1% AND is their flagship their oooo here's what we can do mouse. It should be top of the line, it's not a gimmick if it works bro. Plus nobody said 1k or 2k wont work in 10 years but if they're pricing it at the same price of the competition it's expected to compete, they could've and should've done better considering they were already late to 4k by a year, even though their 2k implementation is very very good and the mouse is overall good they could've 100% made the best mouse on the market both on paper with raw stats and in feel bc logitech sensors do usually just feel way more responsive
@@jerryyy. It's obviously not aimed at the 0.1% lol. the main customer base of this mouse is the casual gamer dad or the 13 year old kid with a 60-144hz monitor who can't even benefit from 4k. logitech wants to make money. aiming at the 0.1% would be a dumb business decision. it's called "pro" for marketing reasons.
The problem with this review is that his used gpro isnt indecative of new changes i switched to and from same mouse and noticed the things hes noticing "scrolling" the "click feel"
BOARDZY MENTION 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥
Please can someone explain to me if I should use Hybrid or optical mode only? I don't care about battery life. Which one is better? Thanks
optical only should be better if i am right. don't own an optical mouse though so can't confirm.
Optical.
Is going from a final mouse starlight 12 to this mouse worth it?
does the video get louder and louder towards the end?
They only made this mouse to comply with EU usb standards.
I recently gave my GPX1 to my kid and bought the GPX2 and really like it. The shape is perfect and the switches are really nice too. As for the sensor and all that, I can't tell a difference. I don't care about 4K and still keep mine on 1K and I couldn't care less about USB-C vs micro-USB. I do think $160 is a ridiculous price for these but I do love this thing and it is my new all time favorite gaming mouse.
what mousepad is he using? I need something that long to fit my whole arm on
superlight is just a good safe mouse in all versions. the way i see it is if u have a superlight 1 and its still working well then keep it. basically upgrade when needed . on the other hand razer viper v2 pro vs v3 pro is a massive change and well worth the money even if your v2 is still working. logitech doesnt push the barriers on tech anymore theyve had 2 ceos since theyve made a groundbreaking popular item aka the first superlight. they do deserve some credit though because they kind of created the modern standards for mice and the superlight 1 is still very usable today its not outdated which other mice have come and gone in no longer than 2 years generally. im a razer viper v3 pro and deathadder v3 hyperspeed lover nowadays but i still pickup my superlight somewhat often because if i want to use something different the gpro is always a safe choice. im waffling to no one so ill shut up now lol
Whats the difference between usb type c and the regular usb whatever? Faster latency or what idk
Functionally not much. The latency should be about the same because it's still digital serial communication, but USBC has really become a standard connector and using that instead of stupid micro USB makes sense for a new product.
@@zanemcmorris4541 For a mouse USB-C means one thing over USB Micro, Longevity. The GPX-SL2 having a USB-C means it will survive FAR more plug and unplug cycles than a USB Micro connection. That honestly seems to be the major theme for this mouse. Optical Switches = Longer Product Life, USB-C = Longer Product Life, the only change they made that isn't going to result directly in the mouse lasting longer is the sensor, which will still indirectly contribute to a longer use since it is still better hardware with more modern (if not current) specs.
Gonna upgrade from gpx to gpx 2 because it has usb c. All my devices, literally all, charge with usb c. I just hold a shitty micro usb cable to charge my gpx. Saw many tests online, done with professional gear in controlled environment, and 1k pooling vs 2k and up is not worth the battery life.
is it worth it to go from the normal gpro to the gpx2?
Upgrading from a superlight 1 to superlight 2 doesn't make sense, however if I were to go back in time before I got my gpx I'd probably get the 2 since you know it's just better slightly
I love my super light but my sensor always killed it self when micro adjustments
the skatez are made for the Logitech hard mousepad but they are dogshit and already starting to worn out after a few days
the standard skatez are totally ok on my skypad3.0 glass mousepad but i will change them as soon as they start to worn out
Finally here? that was 2 weeks ago
the good thing about it is that the original gpx got way more accessible thanks to the price drop, got one for myself recently and it feels incredible, easily the best mouse ive ever had
What were you using as your main?
@@shiion6711 i had been using the deathadder elite for about 5 years, i was hesitant on switching at first bc i thought i wouldnt like the shape, i had to switch from palm to claw grip but i can confidently say after having had it for a while the shape is a perfect fit and way more comfortable than the da ever was
do people actually care about 4k or even 2k polling rate? just sounds like marketing BS consdering people are noticing diminishing returns at monitor refresh rates as low as 240-360hz... and I'd argue monitor refresh rate is MORE important than mouse polling rate (especially since virtually all mice have at LEAST 1k polling rate these days)
Completely marketing tricks.
wait did dimitri find a mouse to actually replace is hold zowie?
It's so weird to me hearing everyone saying that this mouse release is "mid" when the original GPX-SL was considered the gold standard. All of the complaints about the original were related to 3 things. No USB-C, double clicking from wear on the switches, and 1k polling. The GPX-SL2 has literally fixed all of these, and while it lacks 4k+ on the poling it is also looking like, with more and more testing being done, that consistently 4k+ poling is just marketing at the moment. The difference is almost negligible, and it can cause consistency issues for low to mid tier hardware.
I could understand if you have a GPX-SL that works, looking at this and saying "nah not worth upgrading right now", but I also think if you are the type of person who either values a universal connector, or who loved their GPX-SL and is starting to suffer from double click issues, this is a no brainier upgrade.
I just don't think it makes sense to look a the original, call it the gold standard, receive an objective upgrade to the platform in all of the places where the original was lacking, and then say it is only an okay mouse. (Not that this review did that exactly, but it seems to be a pretty consistent sentiment online right now.)
Very safe shape for first timers, but Id go something along the lines of what your grip wants. To me its definitely not worth it when other mice offer less with the same shape.
The shape would have been so much better if they add deeper comfort grove or narrow indent side and it would actually fit 99% of people, Razer and some other companies have been doing X&Y for years(no one use it tbh), the best mouse feet design was on the old g pro wireless and the mouse feet is the worst mouse feet on a premium mouse even worst than g wolves but I actually like the fact it can do 2000hz with just a normal dongle and trust me no one can see a different between 2k and 4Khz
The switches now need much more force to press in and the side buttons didn’t change so I would recommend the gpx1 over 2
(Main htx ace)
the stock skates are exactly why i keep buying superlight! they give u the best aim control in the market
That sounds so heavy when clicked.
My man Niall rocking the glass skates! 💪
now hear me out because this take might be a little bit rough to comprehend it BUT its the truth
what they did with superlight 2 SHOULD HAVE BEEN with superlight OG, for a mouse that costs a fortune should be in any aspect of it literally PERFECT
i used the OG superlight for like 2 months back in 2021 and the double clicks just made me sell it and get myself a viper pro which evendually i upgraded to Viper V2
now i dont worship razer simply because their products tend to be overpriced for no reason at all BUT when it comes to mice bro i never ever had a problem while using razer mice from 2013 to this very day
I cant trust logitech after that move honestly (speaking for their mice products specifically)
Lamzu and pulsar will rise more and more. Logitech is more like Apple, selling bs products with skyrocket price
So what do they use?
It has the same scroll as first version so yes. The scroll has already broken 4 times for me under a year so if that isn't fixed -> 🙃
I still use intellimouse 1.1 i got a gpro x superlight but i aim better with the intellimouse when it breaks if it breaks i switch to the superlight
Why does Niall use a sleeve on the artisan zero. Every sleeve sticks to that pad.
What’s the mouse pad the guy in the vid using ?
Artisan FX Zero Daidai Orange XL
At least it won’t double click with the new optical switches :😅
I would just get it because it has usb c but I will have to wait.
I got my Superlight 1 used for 55€.
But I'm so dump I'll probably pay too much money to get rid of the last micro usb cabel.
You have to keep in mind this isn’t a new mouse because Logitech wanted a new mouse. The old one is banned in the eu
After 2 years the sensor of my old superlight starts to drift randomly, it's quite strange that they released the superlight 2 at the same time, sorry logitech but it smells of cheating here, I bought the razer instead. I also warn against the white version of the mouse, after some time it leaves nasty discolorations in the place where you hold the mouse, which cannot be removed and has nothing to do with personal hygiene.
Are you looking for a new mouse? If you are I can help you find a perfect mouse just for you now if you don’t mind telling me your hand size
the switches save power when they are on the mechanical mode, because the beam of light that works the switch is no longer shining
There is no mechanical mode, it’s either hybrid or optical only, and hybrid is power saving.
so your using a softer mouse pad.. did you try a harder one to see how their skates work?
I really love the superlight, but the mouse wheel is just the biggest trash ever. It always breaks after around 1 year and feels really bad afterwards. Happened to every single one of my 4 superlights. Sad they didn't change anything on the wheel.
they did change the wheel a little. it's quieter and less tactile now.
i've never had an issue with my wheels
Bro flexed his whole setup while informing us about a new mouse
I have the normal gpro, and I'm planning on upgrading to the new superlight. The weight seems perfect to me tbh, not as heavy as normal gpro and not too light like some of the newer mice out now.
it’s worth it you can tell a difference
I feel like they should honey comb under the feet and try to squeeze some extra weight out of it, type C is big step but superlight should've had it anyways. I just want them to make a lighter weight g900/g903 insanely fun mice that are great all-rounders, just a lil too heavy nowadays.
There's a reason why they don't do it, it's to avoid mass refunds.
Too much mass reduction will decrease feedback. A low 60g is optimized.
It's more like a refresh than an actual new version.
I doubt a human can register the difference between 4k or 2k polling. I'd rather save the power needed for the difference and have a longer lasting battery.
Price is to high. I bought the Superlight for 80 bucks and I don't see myself spending more for a mouse with average weight and features.
im just hyped the gpx1 is cheap for my non-mouse-enthusiast friends to cop now :)
They should just take the Original GPX off the market and release the GPX2 at the same price point. Currently it goes for 170 euros in my country which is way overpriced. I'd rather spend 30 more and get the new Finalmouse
Best part is finding out Dmitri is a based pulsar user!!
Bring back the 4 modular buttons from the Original.
And add the infinite scroll wheel.
This is like an apple release lol but should've been released like a year ago.. The shape of the gpro is perfect, don't change that.
the lamzu thorn is literally 90% as good and is half the price. Only actual professionals should be buying the sl2 imo, there are just so many simply better options.
I have the first Superlight, just solder new switches and it becomes the perfect mouse for me. Replacing the skates is subjective tho
I also soldered new switches based on Optimum’s recommendation.
6:43 whyd he flash if his teammate was already peeking 🤦♀️ smh valorant players so bad
my side buttons on superlight 1 got fucked with 1 year of using, mouse 4 double clicks =/
Haha same
Did my man just say “blaze-training?” Lmao 😂
Still love my v2 pro and 4k polling is all placebo anyways
It’s not. Wireless tech just isn’t ready for that yet. I got the viper v2 pro as well as the viper 8k and wireless 4K vs real 4K is day and night difference
@@legendaryz_ch 4k is placebo. sorry.
@@HeK.placebo because u dont have a strong enough pc (anything older than a year)
@@stefanpapdi5151 copium
@@HeK. copium
U have to use the stock glides for 2-3 hours before they get smooth. Everbody knows that.
If people are complaining, clearly this statement is false. It's the company's job to communicate these things better.
Of course it’s going to look the same as the superlight lmao . What u wanted it to look like the g502 or some shit?
so is it worth to pay 30€ more for the superlight 2 if i dont have a wireless mouse yet?
I still use a mouse with a rubber ball. 😂
Are the wheels from Logitech still crap like they ever was?
for anyone that has the Superlight 2... corepad has released skates for the mouse. They are MILES ahead of the stock skates and are pretty much needed.
Where?
I don't see them on their website
@@danieldilly i already ordered them from their website. look harder.
@@danieldilly I found them on corepad European store but they are also available at lethal gaming gear which is where I got mine.
yeah where i also cant find them please i need replacement pads so bad
oh is it on ausmodshop?
At 6:28 he literally turned off the memory mode.
somehow i always end up going back to the superlight 2
roasting another Logitech mice when it's a same price, and intended to be an upgraded model; while Zowie is making worst refresh of all gaming mice like EC2-cw for worse spec and higher price? yeah, this video is biased AF
(Context: Dimitri is Zowie mice fanboy.)
this is not the first time when this media opinion is Bias. it happened before on Logitech GPX (they keep slandering it) vs viper v2. look at them now, Viper v2 users just keep decreasing, in both casuals or pro scenes.
I see where this media going, they keep exploiting any Logitech product weaknesses and keep fanboying Razer and Zowie.
this media will not be getting any gaming brand sponsor any soon.
I got tge UltralightX but its still in the process of making and its supposed to ship mid october i hope it is a good choice
"we work jobs we dont like to buy shit we dont need"
you make very good videos we have 2023 why you dont post 1440p videos