You're not wrong, it was just in that final second or two before take-off. We are told ad infinitum that pilots are "trained for such an eventuality" - one would imagine, nevertheless, that there is some puckering of the sphincter occurring because it's always gonna be a bit of a surprise!😏😎
Actually, having that happen just before V1 is a worse option as you are then faced with a high speed RTO. Modern twin engine jets have gobs of excess thrust so losing an engine after V1 and taking the plane airborne is the safest option unless there has been some catastrophic damage to the airframe. As demonstrated, this crew did the right thing. (RTO = Rejected take-off)
The same title video also on todays 3 minutes video. But Lucaas shows the return trip and the famous "luckily, no one was injured", it was way more fun to watch over here.
except Lucaas' has his HORRIBLE voiceover narration with his annoying AF voice COMPLETELY MASKING THE AUDIO OF THE CRITICAL MOMENT OF ENGINE BLOWOUT lawl this guy just steals everyone's content and reposts it for his own financial gain and jjust ruins them with his horrible voiceovers at the most critical points of the video's audio smfhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Lucaas' HORRIBLE voiceover narration with his annoying AF voice COMPLETELY MASKS THE AUDIO OF THE CRITICAL MOMENT OF ENGINE BLOWOUT lawl this guy just steals everyone's content and reposts it for his own financial gain and jjust ruins them with his horrible voiceovers at the most critical points of the video's audio, which do not actually add any additional information EVER that's pertinent to warrant his voice
Lucaas' HORRIBLE voiceover narration with his annoying AF voice COMPLETELY MASKS THE AUDIO OF THE CRITICAL MOMENT OF ENGINE BLOWOUT lawl this guy just steals everyone's content and reposts it for his own financial gain and jjust ruins them with his horrible voiceovers at the most critical points of the video's audio, which do not actually add any additional information EVER that's pertinent to warrant his voice smfhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
When the gear is traced, that means that the gear door has to open to let the gear up in that door opening increases the dragon immensely so that’s why they don’t immediately retract the gear until they have an established good crime rate which that plane did not so they kept the gear down
Absolutely ! But remember, when the gear lever is moved to up, those huge gear doors are going to open and create a large amount of drag. Something the crew wants to avoid at such a low altitude with one engine.
No, worry only about getting speed up to maintaining climb rate to a safe altitude for the departure and then work the problem in the air. That’s SOP - any failure after V1 means deal with it in the air.
Just curious, is 3 Minutes of Aviation your other channel? I'm subscribed to both and both always release videos on the same day. Nothing against that btw.
V1 is definitely a callout. Some carriers also call v2. Dunno why. Can somebody explain why they didn’t raise the gear. Part of normal certification is redundant systems that will allow that with a loss of either engine. Either it was a mistake, or a system failure beyond a normal engine failure.
@@greenesyt563 well, technically V2 is a speed. So maybe some carrier out there is using it for something, but it would not necessarily mean “positive climb”. Which should be verified visually and via the VVI. Back to the my original comment, is that V2 does not mean “positive rate” or imply that it’s safe to pull the gear. My question in this thread was why did they not retract the gear forever, its part of the. Rey foundation upon which all of these speeds related to performance calculations are based. Either it was a pilot mistake, or there was a system failure beyond the engine loss.
Wow, that Lufthansa is the dreaded V1 cut. Engine failure at the most vulnerable time. They got it back on the ground but I should think that forgetting to retract the landing gear was a bit of a fail. Plane would have climbed much better with it up. Good thing no obstacles in the departure path.
@@PacTheOne Some procedures such as immediately retracting the gear are not performed as the should be - you do not have to be a professional to see the aircraft has real bad climbing rate.
I guess everyone on UA-cam is an A320 pilot. If that's the case I bow to your superior knowledge. I am type rated in several transport category aircraft including one similar to the A320. Raising the landing gear is still done at positive rate on a v1 cut on all three transport category aircraft that I hold a type rating on because all our engine out climb performance data is predicated on retracted gear. With the gear out, we are not guaranteed to clear obstacles.
@@vmeikoEFATO procedures calls for gear up, as soon as positive climb rate is established. Nobody keeps the gear down. Pilots are not trained to keep the gear down.
Those huge gear doors create and add drag, something the crew wants to avoid when that one engine is already trying to get the airplane to a safer altitude.
I have flown many different transport aircraft with over 20,000 hours of flight time. I've never flown an airbus 320 but i have never seen a transport aircraft that the procedure was not gear up with positive rate of climb. I would love to see a post from an actual A320 pilot on this
German pilots have a strong constitution. They'd take off with BOTH engines out and STILL come in for a textbook landing. Deutsche Piloten haben eine starke Konstitution. Sie würden mit BEIDEN ausgefallenen Triebwerken abheben und trotzdem eine Musterlandung hinlegen.
the engine explosion and the liftoff happened in perfect unison 💥💥💥
Wow, that couldn’t have been worse timing for that engine to quit!
You're not wrong, it was just in that final second or two before take-off. We are told ad infinitum that pilots are "trained for such an eventuality" - one would imagine, nevertheless, that there is some puckering of the sphincter occurring because it's always gonna be a bit of a surprise!😏😎
Actually, having that happen just before V1 is a worse option as you are then faced with a high speed RTO. Modern twin engine jets have gobs of excess thrust so losing an engine after V1 and taking the plane airborne is the safest option unless there has been some catastrophic damage to the airframe. As demonstrated, this crew did the right thing. (RTO = Rejected take-off)
@@charlescanton4740they did the right thing, except for raising his gear.
you don't retract gear until positive climb i think@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183
One of thse P&W GTF engines?
The same title video also on todays 3 minutes video. But Lucaas shows the return trip and the famous "luckily, no one was injured", it was way more fun to watch over here.
except Lucaas' has his HORRIBLE voiceover narration with his annoying AF voice COMPLETELY MASKING THE AUDIO OF THE CRITICAL MOMENT OF ENGINE BLOWOUT lawl this guy just steals everyone's content and reposts it for his own financial gain and jjust ruins them with his horrible voiceovers at the most critical points of the video's audio smfhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
And same thumbnail as well
Lucaas' HORRIBLE voiceover narration with his annoying AF voice COMPLETELY MASKS THE AUDIO OF THE CRITICAL MOMENT OF ENGINE BLOWOUT lawl this guy just steals everyone's content and reposts it for his own financial gain and jjust ruins them with his horrible voiceovers at the most critical points of the video's audio, which do not actually add any additional information EVER that's pertinent to warrant his voice
And same planes
Lucaas' HORRIBLE voiceover narration with his annoying AF voice COMPLETELY MASKS THE AUDIO OF THE CRITICAL MOMENT OF ENGINE BLOWOUT lawl this guy just steals everyone's content and reposts it for his own financial gain and jjust ruins them with his horrible voiceovers at the most critical points of the video's audio, which do not actually add any additional information EVER that's pertinent to warrant his voice smfhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
"Manglore to Bangalore" sound good.
I’m from Bangalore or called Bengaluru
I came here for this.😂
Pretty neat rainbow on the mountainside water drop🌈🌈
The pick up was cool but that view before drop off topped it
The plane then diverted from "Mangalore to Bangalore". You'd want a very clean radio connection to explain that to ATC.
The airports will be refered by their code names to avoid exactly the same misunderstanding you talk about.
The reaction time for the Eagle engine shutdown after the after-burner event, was less than a second. That is impressive
The music slaps, great choice!
Ryanair would find a way to charge extra for this.
Thrill Ride - $475
Spirit would make the passengers extinguish the fire themselves upon landing..
absolute worst time to have an engine failure. Immediate gear up would have helped the slow climb out. Maybe that's not procedure.
When the gear is traced, that means that the gear door has to open to let the gear up in that door opening increases the dragon immensely so that’s why they don’t immediately retract the gear until they have an established good crime rate which that plane did not so they kept the gear down
@@coleswack5513 ...a what rate? 💀
@@delfinenteddyson9865 hahahhhaa I see now, I am criminally bad at checking voice types work.
@@coleswack5513 😂
That Atlas Air turned into Ryanair successfully.
Them pilots flying firefighting planes have such a cool job.
Good job pilots.
Nice compilation, thanks one again for sharing 😊
Love your vids
Only true fans will know this is a re-upload
I liked the rainbow🌈 2:13 , the most!
I wonder if Kelsey was on that Atlas flight :)
Great video.
GET THAT GEAR UP
Absolutely ! But remember, when the gear lever is moved to up, those huge gear doors are going to open and create a large amount of drag. Something the crew wants to avoid at such a low altitude with one engine.
No, worry only about getting speed up to maintaining climb rate to a safe altitude for the departure and then work the problem in the air. That’s SOP - any failure after V1 means deal with it in the air.
sol alt köşada çıkan reklam alt yazıyı kapatıyor. Video için teşekkürler. ✈
Выход из строя одного из двух двигателей сразу после принятия решения на взлёт 🤯
0:23 the ambulance is already going to the site. Hope they didn't all 🏴☠️
747 pilot looked to be practicing for a carrier landing.
Just curious, is 3 Minutes of Aviation your other channel? I'm subscribed to both and both always release videos on the same day. Nothing against that btw.
3 minutes of aviation is completely different channel and unrelated
3 minutes of aviation has like atleast 1 weird wrong mistake every vid lol, this dudes way better.
Quite poor climb rate, maybe due to the not retracted gear?
Engine no work after go boom boom
It was the engine that went boom boom
get this right, 1 engine go kaput, instead of 2 engine vrooom, 1 engine vroom, worser climb performance.
@@Leaferr we all be explaining this like little kids 💀
Two engine plane go WoOooosshj, one engine plane not WhOOooOsshhh
Shocking videos 📸
wasn't these videos supossed to show up on sunday?
plen engine espuma!!! 🤯
We're trained to deal with loss on takeoff or landing. That was a compressor stall.
0:05...failure of the right engine 🔥, just when it is already impossible to stop the takeoff!😉 and you need to gain a safe height ! 🤷♂️
That's why they say V2!
V2 is not a call out.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 mbad
V1 is definitely a callout. Some carriers also call v2. Dunno why. Can somebody explain why they didn’t raise the gear. Part of normal certification is redundant systems that will allow that with a loss of either engine. Either it was a mistake, or a system failure beyond a normal engine failure.
@@markg7963 V2 is basically positive rate or Positive climb, before the pilot flying calls gear up. SOPs differ between airlines
@@greenesyt563 well, technically V2 is a speed. So maybe some carrier out there is using it for something, but it would not necessarily mean “positive climb”. Which should be verified visually and via the VVI. Back to the my original comment, is that V2 does not mean “positive rate” or imply that it’s safe to pull the gear. My question in this thread was why did they not retract the gear forever, its part of the. Rey foundation upon which all of these speeds related to performance calculations are based. Either it was a pilot mistake, or there was a system failure beyond the engine loss.
hope everyones okay
The A320engine surge was caused by a bird strike.
Kompressor Stall, they forgot retract gears which was so essential in single eng ops
Great video brother from the imperial county ca 🇺🇲
Wow, that Lufthansa is the dreaded V1 cut. Engine failure at the most vulnerable time. They got it back on the ground but I should think that forgetting to retract the landing gear was a bit of a fail. Plane would have climbed much better with it up. Good thing no obstacles in the departure path.
im sure you know everything about LH procedures
@@PacTheOne Some procedures such as immediately retracting the gear are not performed as the should be - you do not have to be a professional to see the aircraft has real bad climbing rate.
I guess everyone on UA-cam is an A320 pilot. If that's the case I bow to your superior knowledge. I am type rated in several transport category aircraft including one similar to the A320. Raising the landing gear is still done at positive rate on a v1 cut on all three transport category aircraft that I hold a type rating on because all our engine out climb performance data is predicated on retracted gear. With the gear out, we are not guaranteed to clear obstacles.
@@andresmith9212nope. You ALWAYS retract the gear. You don’t leave it down.
@@vmeikoEFATO procedures calls for gear up, as soon as positive climb rate is established. Nobody keeps the gear down. Pilots are not trained to keep the gear down.
It took 17 seconds for the first emergency vehicle to start - german precision 😅
Three minutes of lucaas
Pas évident pour le pilotage 😞
Cool!
Diverted from Bangalore to Bangalore,you mean there is 2 airports in the city and the plane diverted from 1 to the other?
Nope two different cities ..he said "Mangalore to Bangalore "
They are designed to be able to handle that.
plen engine espuma!!!
Explodes? No, not at all
At least it looks pretty much worse than a bird strike ..
Why didn't they retract the gear?
đoạn đầu chắc phi công rất cay
1:46, the first person perspective of Dusty Crophopper
Divert from Mangalore to Bangalore? 😂
Yup, they are both cities in India
They have to retract the gear because of the extra drag
Why aren’t we climbing! How about raising the gear!
Why don’t just be silent and let the pictures speak for themselves
Why so much time to get the gear Up? You lose 1 engine and you need speed to climb
What happened to "V1 - rotate - positive rate - gear up". Hard to climb in 1 eng with the gear down.
Those huge gear doors create and add drag, something the crew wants to avoid when that one engine is already trying to get the airplane to a safer altitude.
I have flown many different transport aircraft with over 20,000 hours of flight time. I've never flown an airbus 320 but i have never seen a transport aircraft that the procedure was not gear up with positive rate of climb. I would love to see a post from an actual A320 pilot on this
2:39 Fun fact: Those streaks on the window are 36% human fecal matter
You mean they dump their load on airway tracks too like they do on railway tracks ?
@@verifiedtoxicangel2411 Airway tracks❌
Runways✅
If it's Boeing I ain't going😂
Butlucklynoonewasinjured..... 👍👍👍👍
do more gaming videos
Stop LYING. The engine didnt "explode".
Bro what the F
German pilots have a strong constitution. They'd take off with BOTH engines out and STILL come in for a textbook landing.
Deutsche Piloten haben eine starke Konstitution. Sie würden mit BEIDEN ausgefallenen Triebwerken abheben und trotzdem eine Musterlandung hinlegen.
Yet they forget to raise the gear. 😂
I am a block of cheese
Airlines are BROKE AND MAINTENANCE IS DELAYED! Add to that counterfeit parts and shoddy record keeping = what we see here.