EDIT 2: Recently LackLuster created a video exposing some questionable tactics of IDC Chris. You can find that video here: ua-cam.com/video/d5b_SgcdPcY/v-deo.html Thanks for joining us! Be sure to like and subscribe for more police interaction content! EDIT: By saying you "must" obey unlawful orders I am referring to reasonable orders whose lawfulness is debatable at the time. Obviously if an officer orders you to jump off of a bridge you do not have to obey that. Please exercise common sense when watching these videos and apply your own logic to whatever the videos are explaining.
I am currently in law school - am a "non-traditional" student (older - 50 - retired military) - and while I want to be a prosecutor, I want to be one that use my principles & ethics in my job.
@@roberth4727 I think he's saying IF you talk to the police. Some folks are good at communication, good at de-escalation, and know how to have an interaction with the police. Now, yes, you can get some cop who is hyped up and it's useless trying to have an actual conversation with them - he's saying if you're not going to talk to them, to affirmatively inform them (politely) that you are exercising your rights.
Steven Cav I disagree. He said it wouldn’t look good in court if you remain silent. While the Supreme Court has said not to talk to the police because they will use anything against you. Thank you for your service. I am a current med student non traditional prior military as well. Thought about being a lawyer but thought again lol
This video upset me, why the fuck cant I arrest the cops involved? Why do police play by different rules when they clearly know little to nothing more than the average person about the laws they think they're enforcing, only how to best go about "enforcing" them and not getting hurt? Its absolutely ridiculous. If I held someone against their will for hurting my feelings I would be a kidnapper and get charged with a slew of felonies, but cops do it and get a stern talking to by one of their buddies then go on with their day.
If she needs to be taught a simple thing like that (which should be common sense anyway), it tells you a lot about the level of requirements they have for applicants.
i agree, but will go even farther by saying every little snowflake on each side needs to brish it off and go about their business. "sticks and stones n shit". TL;DR You feelings is not an argument.
I love how this guy is trying to be a bad-a non-conformist first amendment auditor but then is called by first name LOL Little boy needs a timeout. "Auntie, I told you not to use my first name when I'm filming for my youtube channel!"
@@ghetifal He's perfectly allowed to, he's not somehow less of a person because a police officer knows his name. Sure, he's a scrawny little lad, but it's people doing this auditing that has brought about the necessary need for the Police forces across the world to finally address the issue of egotistical narcissists using it as a platform to gain authority. Kid might not be from a very wealthy family and therefore not be well fed, not his fault.
@@krazedlunatick nice username. By shat disturbing you mean a first amendment auditor? Yes. Do you know what that is? I do. Look it up. Those that abuse their authority can only be stopped by your USA constitutional rights. I don’t live in USA and have very little means to oppose tyranny. This is government employees and allsorts. I have loved ones and family in blue, I think it’s amazing that anyone his age has realized that if he doesn’t exercise his rights, they will be trampled. If I was American, I would help him not condemn him.
@@krazedlunatick my wife is from this town which is hilarious 😂. After myself being there, it’s a small ass town with nothing to do. Everyone knows everyone, or are related somehow. P.S A lot of high school drama with people for some reason, even if it was a decade ago. Buuuuut, yeah apparently this kid instigates this stuff.
When officer's say "Where'd you get your law degree?" they've lost the argument and they are simply being unprofessional. You don't need a law degree to understand your rights as a citizen and it's sad that so many officer's don't know the laws they swore to uphold.
He had a cursory understanding of his rights in this situation, but as ATA pointed out, did not fully understand a Terry stop. So this sergeant was correct. And BTW, don't be an AH. This sergeant should be applauded for calling out Officer Dipstick's BS and releasing this kid.
@@zach4832 If the nursing home complained and called, I suspect the kid was not walking along the sidewalk video recording the scenery. It is the private home of the residents that live there. I wonder if this young man would be so brave video recording a home where a few large men lived.
@@LittleItaly69 how about drive down a California highway while smoking and hit other drivers. Because I got dash cam showing someone smoking a bong slaming a car into a concrete divider.
@@Robert53area That's just an individual who is misusing and under a substance while driving, don't lump responsible high functioning users with those people. :^)
@@buster7345 The officer was ready to arrest him for disorderly conduct, not his refusing to comply with orders. Since there was no disorderly conduct from the recording, and recording from the street is entirely legal, this was an easy answer: no charges. Just because someone doesn't like something does not mean you should be arrested for it. If so, then a cop could arrest you if I called them since I can claim that I am offended by the moniker "Buster".
No shit. Old people called cops for me and my friends hanging out in my driveway on dads car. Doing Absolutely nothing. Cop was like just leave for a lil then come back lol
It is absolutely ridiculous the argument repeated over and over again by the female officer that other people are "bothered" by somebody's presence and she interprets this as reason enough to handcuff and arrest them
9:33 female cop "he was zooming in", she could not know if he was zooming in, she escalated the situation by lying to her superior in order to make an arrest. Hope she gets disciplined but I doubt it.
I was wondering about that too. Judge Judy would have told her "you don't know that. you weren't there!" She has no way of knowing he was zooming in, sounds like she was making it up to get her boss to believe her and take her side.
@@leroyengland1777 She could have the defense that she was relaying the info she got from the complainant. We don't know that the caller didn't mention that he was or wasn't "zooming in". That is also reading into limited knowledge.
@@christiangonzales7429 Even if he was zooming in, that's still not illegal. It's like a person crossing the street to get a better look at a window, but still standing on the public sidewalk. They are technically zooming in by getting closer to the window.
In fact, that statement was after the sergeant asked what the staff were disturbed by. So she may have just been recounting a distilled conversation with the staff person.
As a cop for the past 12 and a half years, I wish I could come across one of these auditors. I guarantee you the encounter would be nothing less than enjoyable, and hopefully would end up as taking a selfie together, and perhaps exchanging numbers to grab a beer sometime. Photography is not a crime, and I wish more officers would see it that way. Unless somebody is on private property taking pictures through window blinds, I can't possibly foresee any illegal act here.
Doesn't it annoy you as an officer that these people are purposely going around causing issues to prove a point... so many better things and more serious things to be doing then wasting money on idiots trying to pound their chests.
@Milton Frank I have seen some that are great where cops have clearer been in the wrong and caught out... but watching some pratt like this is just annoying.
@@TreasureHuntingNana I think I know what you mean. Ive seen some videos where the cop is being nice and respectful but the "Know My rights" people will still give them a hard time.
He was taking pictures of the nursing home and therefore if taking pictures of the windows, is capturing pictures of people inside the nursing home. Is-int that illegal or a level of suspicion?
Mr. Smith, I respectfully disagree. As a licensed mental health clinician, I can, and do, determine an individual's mental state. As a licensed clinician, I can make the judgment, based upon my education, experience, and state licensure with regard to a mental health crisis. I have the authority to place a person in mental health crisis (A danger to them self, or others) on a psychiatric hold in a behavioral health unit. This is a serious responsibility and every engagement is challenging. The authority granted by the State of California to take away a persons freedom is very serious. If I make the wrong decision someone could die.
@@johnnystall9683For a licensed mental health clinician I am worried who gave you your license if you cant understand someones comment and write a very low IQ reply. The person commenting is talking about a citizen calling the cops and then an officer taking the improper procedure to assume someones mental health WITHOUT a mental health examination and arresting them just because some citizen says they have NO IDEA what the status of this individuals mental health is. You realize how this makes you look right? I really hope there are less and less people in your field that get licensed that have no business doing so. Imagine me coming into your place of business and pointing at you and then telling the officer I have no idea what this guys mental state is, so please arrest him. Without probable cause or proper procedure to even come to that conclusion this is just idiocy.
The huy who made this video is a fuckin boot licker, unlawful action by a cop is no different than if a civilian did, and a cop should get twice the penalty in a situation where they violate someones rights, and are ignorant to it, also a cop should know the law wen they are being trained at the academy, my uncle is a retired cop and he retired cuz of retards on the force..... cops have low iqs cuz the system wants mi dless grunts to produce money for the prison industrial complex
@@vitosanfilippo5823 This really surprises me that a lot of people missed this important part. THERE WAS A 911 CALL THAT THERE WERE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY IN THE AREA. If the cop asked people who are taking videos on the sidewalk, you get mad. If the cop don't do anything and something did happen, you get mad. What do you guys want these people to do when they receive a report and they patrol the area for that reason?
@teflontelefon I always find it funny that second amendment auditors will always say "I'm out hear practicing my second ammendment right" or something to that effect. However, these public recording videos you never hear them say "I'm practicing my first amendment right." That would literally take care of their problem if they go to court, and open the city up to a nice lawsuit.
@@greoricm771 absolutely. I just think these public recording should know they are practing a protected first amendment activity and thus when cops ask what they're doing just respond with "engaging in my first amendment right." But they never say something like that. If they did, it could nip a lot of problems in the butt, either right there or in court. Just a strange observation I've made after watching these and open carry videos.
@@j12mkx1 I agree. I'm sure we'd also agree even *that* wouldn't even be respected a meaningful amount of times. But really, that kind of makes the argument to say "I'm out exercising my 2A rights"....because those are being less respected. The whole point of these audits is to educate the public and the interacting LEO about the rights we have, not to necessarily stay out of jail or out of a courtroom. That possibility is kind of the risk you take when you're demonstrating under practiced protected activity.
"You can be bothered by a lot of things Sam..." That's such a powerful statement coming from an officer. Shame more don't recognize this. Just because someone is complaining doesn't mean you can do whatever.
Why do cops keep saying "where did you get your law degree" like laws aren't something everyone has access to... it only hurts the cop especially if the cop is in the wrong
They likely encounter a lot of people who absolutely don’t know the laws. It’s a rarity which someone actually knows the law. A lot of auditors don’t know much about the law, and just spew stuff they watched here on UA-cam. I do find it odd officers think they know the law despite no law degree either.
@@c0nc3ntr8d6 I don't think that changes anything people should know the law equally and bending demeaning to someone you are employed to help dosen't change anything this cop was in the wrong and said something that applied more to himself than the other guy this statement can only backfire there's no reason for it
The U.S legal/police system is so weird If someone called the emergency number because someone was recording on the street they'd get fined for calling for a non emergency.
The constant mass shootings put everyone on edge, and there is a history of criminalizing the poor and the mentally ill, so police are expected to deal with that kind of thing.
Canada has a non-emergency hotline as well. And recording and filming something as well as mild disputes are considered non-emergency. Emergency is when Criminality (robbery/murder/assault), Fire or Ambulance is involved. A shouting match between people is non-emergency. If anything instead of defunding police we need to fund a new organization solely for dealing with non-emergency issues. See a lot of crime actually goes undetected as a result of the burden of all these management of criminality and incidents, if there is a non-emergency based organization that operates like Security guards but for cities, you will see a massive reduction in criminal activities because security forces can deter them without the need for weapons or such as they can report and enforce laws, like traffic cops with tickets. No one wants a spying ring though so these jobs are all volunteers minus the more paid organizational roles for paperworks and such.
This is what bothers me about so many auditors. They often can and do things that are well within their rights. I have no problem with that but it seems that so many auditors go out of their way to act like human hemorrhoids.
As do a very high percentage of police officers. That's why these auditors are out there. Cops are supposed to be trained professionals, yet they are usually the ones who get overly emotional during these interactions. Short-tempered cops should lose their jobs on the spot. They have no business in that job
Because they are :D Just because you are allowed to do something doesn't mean you have to. If you behave like that you are within your legal rights, but you are still an asshole.
Based its basically their job to poke the bear and its the bears job to basically be like ok cool dude 😎 then go back too sleep of the cop instead pursues him and impedes on his amendments based on emotions than its the perfect way to tell if that cop belongs in law enforcement I also agree that not all auditors need to be as hostile and aggressive as others but audit the audit did a video on the shirtless dude who knew his amendment while geochaceing he was a perfect example of a calm and collected auditor especially while in the face of two officers who didn't care abt his amendments on cam
"you can be bothered by alot of things sam" in this exact moment i gained so much respect for this officer, you can tell hes done his job right his whole time on the force and has probably helped plenty of people in these exact situations where someone is being harassed and he steps in hats off to this guy i really enjoyed watching this one
i watched the whole video not that one sentence, and by how many times ive been pulled over and dealt with the shit end of the law enforcement id wish he would have stepped in one of those times
@@paganslayer8661 i get what you mean though its just a small judge of character evryone does it lol you did it with me reading my one comment lol, im not nominating the guy for anything, just saying hes a good guy for that one simple act of kindness you dont see it very often nowadays
@@paganslayer8661 i did say that im still the person where everyone is innocent until proven guilty, now adays it seems like everyones thinking is the other way around now adays
"Officer Holland fell into the typical routine of restoring peace at the expense of administering justice" No better sentence describing women has ever been uttered...
Exactly! As a law enforcement officer you need to be totally objective when approaching a situation! You can definitely tell by the female officers tone of voice that she was emotionally invested in the interaction and was seeking too impose her will which is mostly likely clouding her rational judgement of the said situation!
That sergeant was amazing straight to the point sensible and put everything into its right perspective good job more law enforcement officers need to be as mature and sensible as this officer
there are many people have communism in the dna. they simply love to be the LAW, instead of serving the people under the LAW. she is probably the one in high rank if she work in China...
I mean think about this if you're scoping around an area and people see that you are scoping an area dpnt you think you'd be a little worried, for others who might be confused when you scope out a place it means you are doing surveillance of an area
@@seth_5394 sigh im sorry i don't speak with stupid people its fine i realized its legal so ill just exercise my 2nd ammendment with idiots like you :D
Lonzo he said something so you believe it? She detained him upon ordering him to stop. Detainment isn’t always physical. Did you watch the whole video? Also I don’t know why you’re language was so aggressive towards her, it’s a bit excessive.
@Tiniest Violin These laws are generally orders to stop doing something e.g stop walking, stop fighting etc, not to actively do something e.g shoot him, sign this. Murder and other common law offences are also likely to trump any order and no reasonable person would believe the order should be acted upon.
I watch this channel a bit every day with my kids as part of their schooling. I call it civil rights and public knowledge. Very educational, necessary discussion here, I believe this should be shown as part of every standard school curriculum, as well as to every PD. It would save lives.
I had a police officer years ago admit that he made a mistake and then tell me that he encouraged the use of recording devices by both the officer and the public. He said that he did his best but sometimes another perspective was helpful and that it kept both sides accountable. He also said that he and the officers he knew would be glad to wait until you had a video recording on your phone during a traffic stop before discussing the reason for pull over. Any public servant that is not ok with being filmed should find another profession.
Gorgui Yansane He sounds like smart officer, don’t create a problems to police department, somebody can receive a directions from this officer,congratulations.
You're an idiot if you actually believe that police in the United States are supposed to protect people's rights. You don't have a clue about how your country works.
@@ObservationofLimits Chris was detained after multiple people complained that they were concerned with his actions. Looking at what Chris looks like, a young kid, and seeing him just wandering around a retirement home... yeah I would worry what the kid is up to as well. The cop asked him what he was doing. She ignored the cop. First mistake. He made the cop upset... understandably. Cop simply asked him to stop and tell him why he was there. The "auditor" can simply say "exercising my first amendment" but he didnt because he wants the cop to question him... this is like reverse profiling. Purposefully making yourself look sketchy to get a cop to question you. Then when he was finally detained, legally, he attempted to flee. If you ignore a cop they can take your silence as guilt. If a cop shows up to a 17 year old kid wandering around a retirement home they dont belong in, and the kid then ignores the cop completely... yeah you just incriminated yourself.
I absolutely despise when a cop says where’d you get your law degree as though it’s illegal for a citizen to be knowledgeable of their rights. Like why do they feel the need to go that route
Chris I believe is the civilians name and it is my understanding that Chris didn't have a good grasp of what Terry v. Ohio court case actually says. The supreme court ruled that a police officer cannot legally "stop and frisk" with reasonable suspicion, BUT if you are detained by police you must cooperate with them and Chris was not cooperating after he was detained. Chris was being rude right from the beginning by ignoring the requests of the police officer and it's only fair in my opinion for the sargent to be snarky towards him in return. It's a challenge, the sargent was challenging Chris's knowledge of the law because Chris was challenging another officer.
It’s amazing how many officers aren’t taught simple laws and rights. In the academy and as per apartment policy they should be forced to be made aware before put on duty
There is an incentive to NOT teach patrol officers the law. If the officer believes they are acting in good faith not only are they immune from reprisal but often their actions (illegal searches, for example) can be upheld. For that reason LE agencies have less reason to teach the law than to not.
all cops need to be like this sarg ,,,,, the USA would be a better place , Man hating Ugly woman cop just like the power ,,,,HAHAHA She was going to loose here shit a few times ,,,,, She is a 2 brown bag female ,,,, Always use 2 incase your bag falls off !
She has been called by the residents, does he think the residents will be pleased if she said, "i called him, but he didn't answer, so i think he's fine". Anything can be legal, but doesn't mean it's ok. Help the police to help yourself, if you challenge a police, don't be shocked if they challenge you back. Even the op said, detain can be made, based only from suspicion. Not every police is bad, dude, sometimes they just did what s/he instructed to. That's SOP, every workplace has it own SOP. For her, call-ask-(if you're silent) detain-(if you're proofed being guilty)say the miranda rights. After the miranda rights, yes, you have the rights to remain silent, but before miranda right, no, you're obstructing the justice. That's why it's stupid if you're being pulled over, then the police asked for your documents, you ignored them, and thought you're a chad. gbu 🙏
Cops have had ample time to change their ways. So, I say I can't see it happening as they have been doubling and tripling down on their illegal actions and arrogance despite mounds of evidence against them. If WE THE PEOPLE demand community oversight, transparency, and professionalism from the law enforcement departments which our tax dollars fund then change will happen. Just my opinion.....
Tgis will never going to happen. Only once lice. Is supervised by public inspectors that are interested in questioning what is going on and when they have powers to punish
exactly, it's how cops are taught pretty much everywhere now. Here in UK same thing now, no longer 'police', just armed militia doing the bidding of criminal civilians whom claim to govern the country.
Of course they're going to call in back up dude human behavior can be unpredictable at times for all we know this guy could have came from an asylum recently if that's the case what's stopping him from just going crazy and stabbing you in the face this is what cops think about at times human behavior is very similar to animalistic behavior at times and can be unpredictable only if you know that particular person well is when you can actually predict their behavior and even then they might surprise you at times if this guy was under the influence of drugs anything could have happened especially if he was hiding a weapon of some sort cops don't have X-ray vision
@@KILLSWITCH14FP69 your point is void the second she decides to approach without back up. She obviously wasn't thinking that to begin with... good try though, you wont convince me otherwise. I have spent too many years working along side cops. Most of which liked to instigate and escalaye situations until they have legal justification to put hands on you. Unless its night and nobody is around. Then they just beat your ass and leave ya to your word against a cps in court.
So unnecessary. Why was she so accelerated, and stressed out? Cant be that she felt intimidated or overwhelmed by a teenager who could have been hearing impaired or mildly autistic. Although there seems to be a degree of familiarity, she knew him personally and called him b his first name.... she did get involved personally, as if challenged or provoked by a teenie minding his own business for her inquiry. But she was presenting it wrong, if she wanted to deal with him in a more respecting way than patronizing him as many adults do with young adults or minors still. Why was she overwhelmed by such a flat out non-stressful situation, even if a pedestrian is not interested to open up about their non-crime activities.
@@pendragonU She appeared to me like a newer officer...the way she immediately began explaining herself to the other officer. Hopefully she will learn from this interaction and become a better officer.
It’s astounding to me how many actual police officers believe someone has committed an arrestable offense just because someone else is “disturbed“ or “offended“.
Which is why so many are based on race, gender, and other biases. An officer who likes iphones may be enraged by someone who worships android phones and so wants to lock them up.
so the entire internet alot of the time. considering how theirs so many police interactions of poor interactions such as twitch streamers getting swatted, forceful arrests and other things. These things happens stupidly alot.
Right ON Sgt.!! This made my day. The other officer seemed like she was actively looking for trouble as well as wasting the public's time, money, and policing hours over petty nonsense. Soliciting charges smdh...
Sgt. Stuart might've done the proper thing for the majority of this interaction, but that "wow, where'd you get your law degree" was snarkier than I'd expect from a PO towards a teen, even if the latter was def more arrogant than he should have been.
@@jarlhenrik Even though a bit unprofessional, at least he’s being realistic lol. But at least he took the time to look into it, rather than ignorantly follow the arrest.
I absolutely applaud this sergeant! We need MORE officers like him!! In response to Officer Dipstick saying "they were bothered by the videotaping", this wise sergeant responds "you can be bothered by a lot of things, Sam". YES!!! Outstanding! Holding another officer accountable for being utterly stupid and reckless when it comes to arresting someone.
As if there was people to zoom in on and all the blinds weren’t closed.. Also Sgt Stewart quickly informed me I was still being detained after just telling the Deputy I didn’t do anything illegal
@@ThisChris A call to a number, 911 constitutes as reasonable suspicion? Supreme court found this how? Do you have a link? A cop going to see if they'll sign a complaint, 5:02 that's solicitation. Reasonable suspicion is not a phone call period. Anytime someone calls the police can say, that is a constitutional right. So your information sounds prejudicial. The second cop failed to ask where this young man was. Did he go onto the Lutheran home property? He's on the sidewalk. Yes, I have seen this video before months ago. Holland was soliciting at the bequest of her supervisor. And you didn't comment at 5:02 when the male officer said he will hold the auditor while she goes to solicit the home to sign a complaint. We all appreciate that he finally gathered the information of where the auditor was and that he was never on their property. The auditor does have the right to remain silent. Because everything to the best of their ability WILL be used against him. Again, to ask WHERE he was would have shut this all down. The auditor was more correct than the male cop.
Not only did she fully intend to make an arrest, but she argued with her sergeant before he shut her down with "Yea well you can be bothered by a lot of things"
She's guilty of disorderly conduct, assãult, and false imprisonment. She should have been arrested on the spot and held without bail while awaiting trial since she is clearly a danger to the community.
Hahaha it don't think she is doing this because she is new. If you were a decent person of officer you wouldn't just approach someone and do this, or at least i wouldn't. Shes doing it on purpose.
Sad that that simple rare act of doing your job properly is so great. Should be like this always. Doing whats right. Cops need to be more involved with their sector they run. Have them clean the streets, mingle, yada yada. Instead of going for "points" and getting whoever they want , usually starting with obstruction or resistance when that is such a loose term in the mouth of a cop.
To be fair to officer Holland, she failed to learn both sides of the story mainly because the kid was acting like a jerk to her. She approached him with simple questions and the guy completely ignored her which is just plain rude. She only had a complained from 911 call and an asshole recording a building and disregarding her attempt to solve the given problem. He then kept asking what illegal thing he had been doing but that was exactly what she was trying to find out, what it was if anything.
@@valfssantiago there are men who do this in a demeaning and condescending way, but he’s trying his best to get the point across to her that he’s not breaking any laws since she’s reluctant to accept that. They most likely had a discussion later where he had to reiterate that he meant “you” in general so as not to make it seem personal though lol.
female think & act differently then males, there times that females can help, but put them out on the street & cut them lose from supervision,,, wow! Mendota is asking for law suits,,,,
It's not illegal to be an ass. Being an ass doesn't warrant a false arrest. Taking video from a sidewalk isn't 'suspicious activity'. I would say it's quite natural to be defensive or deflective when being detained for exercising your 1st amendment, imo I would go a step further and say knowing your innocent, and the cop having nothing but 'suspicion' warrants a 'in fear for my life' reponse given the track record, but I'm a bit extreme about my rights. If he was in the window with it sure? but was he NO, was it reported that he was NO, did he say that he was NO. So Release Him. Then toss 'i do what i feel' brunette in a cell for a couple months and strip her badge. REALLY your gonna cite mental health? She basically admitted she detained someone because someone else 'felt' they should. That's fucked up.
sorry for making the 'interent' dumber lmfao. Also I never addressed you once in my statement, I was making the clear point that a police officers job isn't to take action based on attitude received. Good job with your own paragraph though, even if the point went clear over yonder.
@@dennisivan85 Dude my entire comment was about the video, yes I used your 'ass' comment as an example, One Single TIME out of an entire paragraph, and still wasn't directed at you, not once. That doesn't make the entire paragraph about you, get the fuck over it. What is your obsession with me? Are you that mad that you look like a stalker now? or what? Get a damn life. Why are you still here? Like holy shit, I bet youre a damn blast at parties. also do you have any idea what strawman is? because you trying to make this entire thing about you which was never my argument, and never defining what it is you're even arguing about is strawman you absolute buffoon. Now move on, go talk to some people in real life, and try to get better cause you popping off to strangers on youtube, and assuming you're the center of the world isn't all that healthy.
@Miss O’Genist i mean, if you think following the law makes people zealots then...thing about the law is that it doesn't matter how annoying or doofy someone is, they still deserve to not be hassled or charged with something when they're not breaking any law.
I'm starting to think the Staff were only REALLY concerned about him AFTER Holland TOLD them some guy had been recording and wasn't answering her questions. I don't know about you but I think we've got a Overzealot here..
A lot of bad cops are sociopaths and psychopaths taking a easy way to get in... Cop recruitment gets less strict and training less lengthy to out more feet on the ground sooner... Retraining isn't a common thing for American law enforcement. You can say that the system gets filled with corruption because it cannot manage itself cleanly.
If i was a police officer in usa i would hand my badge in its not worth bothering anymore let crime go thru the roof then see what they do to recruit police
"You could be bothered by a lot of things Sam". Good for that senior officer. You need to check incompetence like this with pure knowledge and logic. The way that he so blatantly laid it out for her like that really sent the point home for her
@@goodmorningsundaymorning4533 did white women magically stop being Karens? it’s old because you identify with them and have them in your family. You won’t accept or admit that tho
@@realspitter2727 nah Karen has kinda just devolved from overuse. Like originally it was just entitled dumb white women with dumb haircuts but now it's just used as white woman that disagrees with me
I love it when a cop is all “Where’d you get your law degree?” or “Wow, you some kind of rights expert?”. Like what, we’re not allowed to be knowledgable in how our country works?
Dude, the sergeant was right. As ATA pointed out, this kid didn't really fully understand a Terry stop. While misguided, Officer Dipstick did have reasonable suspicion to stop him, and his refusal to comply could have landed him in big trouble... You should be applauding this sergeant instead of defaulting to the anti-cop position. He de-escalated this situation, called out Officer Dipstick for the BS she was peddling, and said the wisest thing I've heard a cop say: "you can be bothered by a lot of things, Sam".
True but suspicious activity still cause for a temporary detainment. Js. But the sgt was right also. She kinda held him a little too long And if hes just an auditor then hes a piece of shit. People have things to do and cops do have to go check suspicious activity which uses up resources. However if hes just documenting things for possible court later than hell ya. No auditors are doing anything illegal. But at what point are you just a pest to those actually trying to do their job and help real situations
Actually, alot people don't know what rights they have and they just spew them up. Rights are rights granted by the law of the country and in the un declaration of human rights if the country sign it. Anything not on this two lists is not legally a right. Choosing not to stop when ordered by an officer is not within his rights. Choosing to remain his silence is within his rights but it is also within the officer rights to detain him until they get further information. What the Sgt and this video explain that if he has just cooperated, the situation would deescalate very quickly. Everyone exercise their rights properly and everyone goes on their merry way. As a first amendment auditor, he should know his laws before attempting this social movement. But he didn't and hence why the Sgt have that sarcastic remark cos he doesn't know his rights, he just claimed he has the right not to be questioned or detained when ordered to stop by an law enforcement officer, which is not his rights. The officer is wrong to not properly investigate the situation and escalate the situation but it is within her rights to stop a person if someone is acting suspiciously. The man in question, is exercising a first amendment audit - that is already intentionally acting in suspicious. If he just informed his intention, done. Nothing goes wrong. The video explained all of it
"My response would be " do I need a degree to know my rights" It's an especially stupid question because the cop himself doesn't have a law degree either. His own retarded logic disqualifies him from being a cop.
@@christiangonzales7429 pretty sure he meant "you" as in the general you. IE - people can be bothered by a lot of things, that doesn't mean all of them should call the police or all hose things are illegal.
@@idave4900 10:19 she says "they said they were bothered by-" to which he cuts her off with "You can be bothered by a lot of things sam". Take the whole conversation as context like you would if you were talking with someone, not just that one specific snippet
She's more than likely attempted to squelch his freedoms before. More than once. Too bad for her that the sarge won't be having any part of her 'detainment' of a public photographer 'rightfully' going about his day. The code enforcing, policy enforcing, law enforcing tyrants will continue to 'get the lesson' until they 'get the lesson'.
@Smiley Junior - How on Earth is she a sjw??? However you feel about the people that you describe as 'SJWs', they are almost uniformly against abuse of police power. It tends to be rightwing nutjobs that support this type of behavior.
@@Codex7777 NOT TRUE (NOT SAYING SHE'S A SJW) BUT SJW'S ARE FOR ABUSE OF POWER IF YOU HAVE THE WRONG OPINION. IF YOU PROTEST GAY MARRIAGE WITH A LEGAL PERMIT THEY'D WANT THE POLICE TO END IT BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. THERE WAS A SORY A WHILE BACK, 2 GUYS SET UP AN ABORTION IS MURDER THING (NOT REALLY A PROTEST) AND A FAT SJW PHYSICALLY STARTED ATTACKING THEM AND CHASING THEM TO A BUS. SJW HAVE NO PRINCIPLES
Cop answered with "but you hurt the old peoples feefees" welcome to 2021 where feelings now carry the weight of law depending on how educated the officer you encounter is...
5:45 the question asked & head turned looking 👀 for response. ATA covers it's only suspicion necessary for detention. Also, officer need not disclose to suspect what was suspicious.
Is it not true that old folks are always in danger from abusive nursing home works. So, if an old citizens advocate is investigating such places then the complaining people are most likely the abusers.
Macho Machin I agree, I wasn’t commenting on the video. I was asking what proof Rick Mason has proving that staff in the home are abusing residents. Would of expected a more intelligent argument than “oh shut up” I asked a civilized and intelligent question.
@@neilgoulsbra7103 it is a good point though....i know the facility my mom works at anyone can go visit any resident..... So why are they worried about him?
@Macho Machin oh really so you have no problem someone videotaping through your window all day at your home? Get the f*** out of here man you guys are such hypocrites
EDIT 2: Recently LackLuster created a video exposing some questionable tactics of IDC Chris. You can find that video here: ua-cam.com/video/d5b_SgcdPcY/v-deo.html
Thanks for joining us! Be sure to like and subscribe for more police interaction content!
EDIT: By saying you "must" obey unlawful orders I am referring to reasonable orders whose lawfulness is debatable at the time. Obviously if an officer orders you to jump off of a bridge you do not have to obey that. Please exercise common sense when watching these videos and apply your own logic to whatever the videos are explaining.
I am currently in law school - am a "non-traditional" student (older - 50 - retired military) - and while I want to be a prosecutor, I want to be one that use my principles & ethics in my job.
Audit the Audit I think you are joking us. You recommend to talk to police while SCOTUS says not to. That’s a joke right?? Talk to the police??
Joking you. Is that a new term?
Oh, I think you meant liking.
@@roberth4727
I think he's saying IF you talk to the police. Some folks are good at communication, good at de-escalation, and know how to have an interaction with the police.
Now, yes, you can get some cop who is hyped up and it's useless trying to have an actual conversation with them - he's saying if you're not going to talk to them, to affirmatively inform them (politely) that you are exercising your rights.
Steven Cav I disagree. He said it wouldn’t look good in court if you remain silent. While the Supreme Court has said not to talk to the police because they will use anything against you.
Thank you for your service. I am a current med student non traditional prior military as well. Thought about being a lawyer but thought again lol
Never understand why some cops say “you sound like a lawyer”
Shouldn’t shame someone for knowing their rights
Cops do many things you won’t understand
Which law school did I go to?
Same one you went to, sergeant!
"Thanks, I try to sound more informed that ignorant law enforcement"
Annoying when people know their rights and can't be pushed around that easily
So "lawyer" is an insult? ... oh yeah, I see your point. :D
if "upsetting people" were a crime, everyone would be arrested all the time...
This video upset me, why the fuck cant I arrest the cops involved? Why do police play by different rules when they clearly know little to nothing more than the average person about the laws they think they're enforcing, only how to best go about "enforcing" them and not getting hurt?
Its absolutely ridiculous. If I held someone against their will for hurting my feelings I would be a kidnapper and get charged with a slew of felonies, but cops do it and get a stern talking to by one of their buddies then go on with their day.
Grabbing someone like that is a crime tho
If only rioting, burning public/private property, etc got people arrested
@@mud4309 did you watch the whole video? These cops care about "peace" not "justice"
Yeah, but there are different types of upsetting, he was being creepy basically harassing the people in the building by violating their privacy
“People can be disturbed by a lot of things, Sam”
That was exactly what needed to be said there...good job, Sarge.
You can tell she's gonna get disturbed by all the male officers in her area hahahahahahahaaaa
If she needs to be taught a simple thing like that (which should be common sense anyway), it tells you a lot about the level of requirements they have for applicants.
Indeed! Great response from him. He defused the situation right then and there, and then "reprimanded" his subaltern.
i agree, but will go even farther by saying every little snowflake on each side needs to brish it off and go about their business. "sticks and stones n shit".
TL;DR You feelings is not an argument.
@@beatz04 Orr it just tells you that she blatantly ignores her procedures and that the actions of one do not represent the rest.
I like how the lady literally sees him and addresses him by his first name.
Classic small-town drama
I love how this guy is trying to be a bad-a non-conformist first amendment auditor but then is called by first name LOL Little boy needs a timeout. "Auntie, I told you not to use my first name when I'm filming for my youtube channel!"
what the fuck are you talking about@@ghetifal
@@ghetifallol your comment was tremendous ! Fantastic job young fella .
Yeah I recon she just wanted to arrest him so he quits the whole youtube thing. Scare the fella straight 🤣
@@ghetifal He's perfectly allowed to, he's not somehow less of a person because a police officer knows his name. Sure, he's a scrawny little lad, but it's people doing this auditing that has brought about the necessary need for the Police forces across the world to finally address the issue of egotistical narcissists using it as a platform to gain authority.
Kid might not be from a very wealthy family and therefore not be well fed, not his fault.
So much respect for this officer. To actually question his partner. Well done.
That's a subordinate not a "partner". She needs to go back to the academy and learn her job.
Yes
i'm a strait man, but i want to have his babies
@@joshgreen2627 hey im an athiest, but god is real
Partner ? Lmaooo. Hilarious.
How does she know his name? Lol it's probably a small town and the nursing home called like "goddamn chris is outside filming again....send karen"
Small town is an understatement. Like 7500 including in town,and surrounding rural areas.
Lol, release the Karen's!!!!
🤣🤣🤣😂😂
Hilarious! Nice Taylor.
😂😂😂 this comment is perfect
They way she started and continued to call him _Chris_ I thought that was his mom.
It leads me to believe that he's a pretty well known shit disturber in his area.
@@krazedlunatick Not breaking any laws though so in reality it's the other's making a problem over someone acting in a lawful way.
@@krazedlunatick nice username. By shat disturbing you mean a first amendment auditor? Yes. Do you know what that is? I do. Look it up.
Those that abuse their authority can only be stopped by your USA constitutional rights. I don’t live in USA and have very little means to oppose tyranny. This is government employees and allsorts. I have loved ones and family in blue, I think it’s amazing that anyone his age has realized that if he doesn’t exercise his rights, they will be trampled. If I was American, I would help him not condemn him.
She acted like it, wow. Then went to find someone to sign a charge!! Common but illegal too. Good thing sergeant set her straight!
@@krazedlunatick my wife is from this town which is hilarious 😂. After myself being there, it’s a small ass town with nothing to do. Everyone knows everyone, or are related somehow. P.S A lot of high school drama with people for some reason, even if it was a decade ago. Buuuuut, yeah apparently this kid instigates this stuff.
When officer's say "Where'd you get your law degree?" they've lost the argument and they are simply being unprofessional. You don't need a law degree to understand your rights as a citizen and it's sad that so many officer's don't know the laws they swore to uphold.
Kid could ask them cop the same question.
He had a cursory understanding of his rights in this situation, but as ATA pointed out, did not fully understand a Terry stop. So this sergeant was correct. And BTW, don't be an AH. This sergeant should be applauded for calling out Officer Dipstick's BS and releasing this kid.
They DO know.
"Where'd you get your law degree?" - cops who don't have law degrees
Idk y u hating on my manz stewart
Haha exactly
@Wales Eakes ummmmm, u good bro. frfr use some common sense.
Only Lawyers can make an argument for their rights. Us lowly lowly civilians are above them and are therefor not qualified.
At least not in America
"you can be bothered by a lot of things, Sam" most underrated comment
Agreed, extra fun when they break character and go first name on each other lol.
she could be an officer karen in training lol
I came here to say this lmaoo
It's so down to earth wtf
I burst out laughing and clapped my hands when he said that haha
@@deebop4904you can be bothered by a lot of things, dee Bop
“You can be bothered by a lot of things Sam” LOL
Should a snowflake ever try and be a cop?
John Doe she had every right to detain him. Sorry you have some strange vendetta against women.
@@zach4832 If the nursing home complained and called, I suspect the kid was not walking along the sidewalk video recording the scenery. It is the private home of the residents that live there. I wonder if this young man would be so brave video recording a home where a few large men lived.
@@zach4832 every right? We must not have been watching the same video.
@@zach4832 yes she does if she have a right reason lol
Police departments really need to have more training for officers. And I agree it is very rare to run into a well informed officer like the Sgt.
All police are all trained and they get out there and think thier batman and Robin on ICE
There are actually more officers well informed than not.
They are all educated and trained. It is only "whether they want to follow the law on the streets or not".
I wish cops weren’t incentivized to make petty arrests. I’d rather have a cop who arrests two rapists a year than 100 people who possessed marijuana.
how much weed we talking about? 1 gram? 100 grams? 1,000 grams?
조재형ジェイムズ fuck the amount, what you gunna do on weed? Rob your own fridge?
@@LittleItaly69 how about drive down a California highway while smoking and hit other drivers. Because I got dash cam showing someone smoking a bong slaming a car into a concrete divider.
조재형ジェイムズ why does it matter. You could have 50 tons of weed. Who cares
@@Robert53area That's just an individual who is misusing and under a substance while driving, don't lump responsible high functioning users with those people. :^)
“You can be bothered by a lot of things, Sam.” Such wise words. If only more cops understood this simple concept.
Flow lol
Flow, I think you’re a little confused
Very confused* 😂😂
I smiled inside when he said that 😊
Would me better if cops really knew laws
If we arrested everyone and everything that bothered old people, little kids would be in jail for playing whiffle ball on the street!
It’s not about doing something in the street, it’s about not listening to orders from the authorities
@@buster7345 The officer was ready to arrest him for disorderly conduct, not his refusing to comply with orders.
Since there was no disorderly conduct from the recording, and recording from the street is entirely legal, this was an easy answer: no charges.
Just because someone doesn't like something does not mean you should be arrested for it. If so, then a cop could arrest you if I called them since I can claim that I am offended by the moniker "Buster".
Absolutely in agreement with your words
No shit. Old people called cops for me and my friends hanging out in my driveway on dads car. Doing Absolutely nothing. Cop was like just leave for a lil then come back lol
@ballerboy doyoueven Yes, he would lick that officer's boots.
It is absolutely ridiculous the argument repeated over and over again by the female officer that other people are "bothered" by somebody's presence and she interprets this as reason enough to handcuff and arrest them
"You could be bothered by a lot of things, Sam".
I was hoping he would say that.
Omg I couldn't wait for that statement to be said to her.
I think Sam is his ex wife
Yep, that was golden and perfectly pointed the problem in this case.
Is that officer chick was so scared she is not fit to be a cop at all
@@Rumple. idk how long she's been on the force, but to be fair they're called rookies for a reason
9:33 female cop "he was zooming in", she could not know if he was zooming in, she escalated the situation by lying to her superior in order to make an arrest. Hope she gets disciplined but I doubt it.
I was wondering about that too. Judge Judy would have told her "you don't know that. you weren't there!" She has no way of knowing he was zooming in, sounds like she was making it up to get her boss to believe her and take her side.
mrcoolsdream1 She outright lied. She never asked to look at what he was filming 🤔
@@leroyengland1777 She could have the defense that she was relaying the info she got from the complainant. We don't know that the caller didn't mention that he was or wasn't "zooming in". That is also reading into limited knowledge.
@@christiangonzales7429 Even if he was zooming in, that's still not illegal. It's like a person crossing the street to get a better look at a window, but still standing on the public sidewalk. They are technically zooming in by getting closer to the window.
In fact, that statement was after the sergeant asked what the staff were disturbed by. So she may have just been recounting a distilled conversation with the staff person.
As a cop for the past 12 and a half years, I wish I could come across one of these auditors. I guarantee you the encounter would be nothing less than enjoyable, and hopefully would end up as taking a selfie together, and perhaps exchanging numbers to grab a beer sometime. Photography is not a crime, and I wish more officers would see it that way. Unless somebody is on private property taking pictures through window blinds, I can't possibly foresee any illegal act here.
Doesn't it annoy you as an officer that these people are purposely going around causing issues to prove a point... so many better things and more serious things to be doing then wasting money on idiots trying to pound their chests.
@@TreasureHuntingNana not sure your argument here
@Milton Frank I have seen some that are great where cops have clearer been in the wrong and caught out... but watching some pratt like this is just annoying.
@@TreasureHuntingNana I think I know what you mean. Ive seen some videos where the cop is being nice and respectful but the "Know My rights" people will still give them a hard time.
He was taking pictures of the nursing home and therefore if taking pictures of the windows, is capturing pictures of people inside the nursing home. Is-int that illegal or a level of suspicion?
I'm glad this was resolved calmly. Kudos to the Sergeant.
The only crime committed was those glasses she’s wearing on her face
Looks like something out of a kids show
😂😂😂😂
They were tactical hahahah
I think they have a camera?😂
@@fernybern lol I’ve got tactical glasses too and they look nothing like that. The crime is that she chose that style herself lol
"They don't know his mental state." Okay? No one knows anyone's mental state. That's not actionable
Right! It's none of your business!! Go and speak with the caller and check their mental state!!
@ no...just answer the question.
@@jasonschwartz9481 what are you talking about?
Mr. Smith, I respectfully disagree. As a licensed mental health clinician, I can, and do, determine an individual's mental state. As a licensed clinician, I can make the judgment, based upon my education, experience, and state licensure with regard to a mental health crisis. I have the authority to place a person in mental health crisis (A danger to them self, or others) on a psychiatric hold in a behavioral health unit. This is a serious responsibility and every engagement is challenging. The authority granted by the State of California to take away a persons freedom is very serious. If I make the wrong decision someone could die.
@@johnnystall9683For a licensed mental health clinician I am worried who gave you your license if you cant understand someones comment and write a very low IQ reply. The person commenting is talking about a citizen calling the cops and then an officer taking the improper procedure to assume someones mental health WITHOUT a mental health examination and arresting them just because some citizen says they have NO IDEA what the status of this individuals mental health is. You realize how this makes you look right? I really hope there are less and less people in your field that get licensed that have no business doing so. Imagine me coming into your place of business and pointing at you and then telling the officer I have no idea what this guys mental state is, so please arrest him. Without probable cause or proper procedure to even come to that conclusion this is just idiocy.
Upsetting people isn't illegal.... If it was, I would've gotten life a long time ago lol
It's great 😍 twinsies
This upset me lol😄
Me too.
The huy who made this video is a fuckin boot licker, unlawful action by a cop is no different than if a civilian did, and a cop should get twice the penalty in a situation where they violate someones rights, and are ignorant to it, also a cop should know the law wen they are being trained at the academy, my uncle is a retired cop and he retired cuz of retards on the force..... cops have low iqs cuz the system wants mi dless grunts to produce money for the prison industrial complex
@@vitosanfilippo5823 This really surprises me that a lot of people missed this important part. THERE WAS A 911 CALL THAT THERE WERE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY IN THE AREA. If the cop asked people who are taking videos on the sidewalk, you get mad. If the cop don't do anything and something did happen, you get mad.
What do you guys want these people to do when they receive a report and they patrol the area for that reason?
Repeat after me, Officer: "Ignorance of the law *is NOT an excuse."*
So...what *specific law* are you accusing me of violating?
Recording a nursing home? Meh, most excitement they've had there in 20 years.
Haha, folks! :D
You'd be surprised, a lot of old people homes have STD problems. lul
Besides the dude who tried to trade the baby for a bigmac
@@yooperlooper2271 did it come with extra pickles?
@@consumerofmicroplastics Yep, I used to work at one. It still burns.
That awkward silence after he said “what crime am I suspected of committing” 😂
@teflontelefon I always find it funny that second amendment auditors will always say "I'm out hear practicing my second ammendment right" or something to that effect. However, these public recording videos you never hear them say "I'm practicing my first amendment right." That would literally take care of their problem if they go to court, and open the city up to a nice lawsuit.
@@j12mkx1 Depends on what protected right they're trying to educate on doesn't it?
@@greoricm771 absolutely. I just think these public recording should know they are practing a protected first amendment activity and thus when cops ask what they're doing just respond with "engaging in my first amendment right." But they never say something like that. If they did, it could nip a lot of problems in the butt, either right there or in court. Just a strange observation I've made after watching these and open carry videos.
j12mkx1 *here
@@j12mkx1 I agree. I'm sure we'd also agree even *that* wouldn't even be respected a meaningful amount of times. But really, that kind of makes the argument to say "I'm out exercising my 2A rights"....because those are being less respected. The whole point of these audits is to educate the public and the interacting LEO about the rights we have, not to necessarily stay out of jail or out of a courtroom. That possibility is kind of the risk you take when you're demonstrating under practiced protected activity.
"You can be bothered by a lot of things Sam..."
That's such a powerful statement coming from an officer. Shame more don't recognize this. Just because someone is complaining doesn't mean you can do whatever.
hear, hear!
Mist officers know this
"You can be bothered by a lot of things, Sam." Good man! 😂
Why do cops keep saying "where did you get your law degree" like laws aren't something everyone has access to... it only hurts the cop especially if the cop is in the wrong
Agreed. They don’t want citizens to know their rights because it points out when they are being violated.
They likely encounter a lot of people who absolutely don’t know the laws. It’s a rarity which someone actually knows the law. A lot of auditors don’t know much about the law, and just spew stuff they watched here on UA-cam. I do find it odd officers think they know the law despite no law degree either.
@@c0nc3ntr8d6 I don't think that changes anything people should know the law equally and bending demeaning to someone you are employed to help dosen't change anything this cop was in the wrong and said something that applied more to himself than the other guy this statement can only backfire there's no reason for it
I got my law degree at Wal-Mart, it was on special! Weeww pullover!!
cops are all scripted.
The U.S legal/police system is so weird
If someone called the emergency number because someone was recording on the street they'd get fined for calling for a non emergency.
Its meant to oppress its citizens
The constant mass shootings put everyone on edge, and there is a history of criminalizing the poor and the mentally ill, so police are expected to deal with that kind of thing.
Canada has a non-emergency hotline as well.
And recording and filming something as well as mild disputes are considered non-emergency. Emergency is when Criminality (robbery/murder/assault), Fire or Ambulance is involved.
A shouting match between people is non-emergency.
If anything instead of defunding police we need to fund a new organization solely for dealing with non-emergency issues.
See a lot of crime actually goes undetected as a result of the burden of all these management of criminality and incidents, if there is a non-emergency based organization that operates like Security guards but for cities, you will see a massive reduction in criminal activities because security forces can deter them without the need for weapons or such as they can report and enforce laws, like traffic cops with tickets.
No one wants a spying ring though so these jobs are all volunteers minus the more paid organizational roles for paperworks and such.
@@sanjaymatsuda4504 its like you an everyone else can't see the blatant brainwashing and how the US wants to create a police state.
@@bitchface235 easy tiger
10:25
"You can be bothered by a lot of things"
Words of a man tempered be experience
Absolutely massive!
The city is lucky to have this guy on the face. He seems like the kinda guy who will not let any bullshit happen in his city. I commend him.
This is what bothers me about so many auditors. They often can and do things that are well within their rights. I have no problem with that but it seems that so many auditors go out of their way to act like human hemorrhoids.
As do a very high percentage of police officers. That's why these auditors are out there. Cops are supposed to be trained professionals, yet they are usually the ones who get overly emotional during these interactions. Short-tempered cops should lose their jobs on the spot. They have no business in that job
Because they are :D Just because you are allowed to do something doesn't mean you have to. If you behave like that you are within your legal rights, but you are still an asshole.
Yes, that’s the point. No matter how annoying someone is the police still shouldn’t violate their rights.
For saying he doesn't answer questions? LMAO 😂 You're in for a ride awakening in you think THAT is being an asshole.
Based its basically their job to poke the bear and its the bears job to basically be like ok cool dude 😎 then go back too sleep of the cop instead pursues him and impedes on his amendments based on emotions than its the perfect way to tell if that cop belongs in law enforcement I also agree that not all auditors need to be as hostile and aggressive as others but audit the audit did a video on the shirtless dude who knew his amendment while geochaceing he was a perfect example of a calm and collected auditor especially while in the face of two officers who didn't care abt his amendments on cam
"you can be bothered by alot of things sam" in this exact moment i gained so much respect for this officer, you can tell hes done his job right his whole time on the force and has probably helped plenty of people in these exact situations where someone is being harassed and he steps in hats off to this guy i really enjoyed watching this one
Why people like you make absolute character judgments based off one simple sentence will never make sense to me 😂😂😂 wtf dude
i watched the whole video not that one sentence, and by how many times ive been pulled over and dealt with the shit end of the law enforcement id wish he would have stepped in one of those times
@@paganslayer8661 i get what you mean though its just a small judge of character evryone does it lol you did it with me reading my one comment lol, im not nominating the guy for anything, just saying hes a good guy for that one simple act of kindness you dont see it very often nowadays
@@nyx7031 you said that “you can tell his job right his whole time on the force” based off one sentence
@@paganslayer8661 i did say that im still the person where everyone is innocent until proven guilty, now adays it seems like everyones thinking is the other way around now adays
“Where’d you get your law degree” I didn’t know you needed a law degree to know your rights
Don’t need one to be a police officer, either.
Hey at least the officer didn't get angry a civilian knows their rights.
"the same place you did officer k-12"
My thought exactly.
You don’t, it’s an expression of surprise at the kids knowledge on the subject...
He didn’t say, show me your law degree...
I think Chris refused her sometime ago. She knows him
Lol
Chris just seems like an asshole. He's clearly just harassing vulnerable people and instigating a reaction.
Small Town makes for a smaller world
@@Soylent2024 so... is it illegal?.... then shut the f*** up
@@Soylent2024You obviously saw the harassment which we didn't see at what stage of the video did the harrasment take place?
I love how she has this tone like he's her little brother. "CHRIS... not again. I don't have time for this today... Chris... stop or I'm telling mom."
"You can be bothered by a lot of things Sam"- what a great quote
"Officer Holland fell into the typical routine of restoring peace at the expense of administering justice"
No better sentence describing women has ever been uttered...
Owned by one of your own lol
Lot of people don't seem to understand when he said "you" he was referring to people in general. He wasn't taking a shot at her directly.
@@SpencerFcp who doesn't understand that? He meant "you" in general and he was taking a shot at her directly
"you can be bothered by a lot of things Sam" sounds like one of the more reasonable cops.
Yeah that made me feel pretty good.
Exactly! As a law enforcement officer you need to be totally objective when approaching a situation! You can definitely tell by the female officers tone of voice that she was emotionally invested in the interaction and was seeking too impose her will which is mostly likely clouding her rational judgement of the said situation!
She summited a complaint against the supervisor for correcting her errors and embarrassing her in public.
Best quote ever ;)
She'd be wise to be bothered most by the mirror's reflection. Holy mother of God is that woman ugly. Like Hills Have Eyes ugly 😳
There's a BIG difference between "hey I need to talk to you" and "stop right there, I'm detaining you" ..
People know to understand that!
Pfft, we should've understood that? We would've taken to jail without a cause or killed while in their custody.
Or just stopping be rude to other people and start thinking about how you want be be treated.
She literally said Chris Chris I’m talking to u and he just kept walking he was looking for problems fr
@@cloots1083 he's a child acting harmlessly, let's get over ourselves.
@@bert7651 alright next time a cop tries to talk to u just walk away
That sergeant was amazing straight to the point sensible and put everything into its right perspective good job more law enforcement officers need to be as mature and sensible as this officer
I love how many times she tried to make excuses for arresting him after being told it isn’t illegal.
Like Fr she just couldn’t let it go
They love the "mental state" excuse because they can abuse it so easily.
He had to smack her with the first name drop for her to realize he was telling her she was in the wrong
Cops think they know everything then act like their crap don’t stink because they’re cops.
there are many people have communism in the dna. they simply love to be the LAW, instead of serving the people under the LAW. she is probably the one in high rank if she work in China...
"I'm uncomfortable. Arrest that person!"
I smell karen
I mean think about this if you're scoping around an area and people see that you are scoping an area dpnt you think you'd be a little worried, for others who might be confused when you scope out a place it means you are doing surveillance of an area
@@Tihamatt - Wouldn't who be a little worried? Make sense please.
@@seth_5394 sigh im sorry i don't speak with stupid people its fine i realized its legal so ill just exercise my 2nd ammendment with idiots like you :D
You people are so stupid
She knew his first name before she stopped him. It's either a pretty small town, she's his ex, or he enjoys trolling her for some silly reason.
I'm guessing he is a habitual idiot
Lonzo he said something so you believe it? She detained him upon ordering him to stop. Detainment isn’t always physical. Did you watch the whole video? Also I don’t know why you’re language was so aggressive towards her, it’s a bit excessive.
would never play cops and robbers with that
@Tiniest Violin These laws are generally orders to stop doing something e.g stop walking, stop fighting etc, not to actively do something e.g shoot him, sign this. Murder and other common law offences are also likely to trump any order and no reasonable person would believe the order should be acted upon.
cdr4286
She probably knew his name because they played doctor together in kindergarten!
I watch this channel a bit every day with my kids as part of their schooling. I call it civil rights and public knowledge. Very educational, necessary discussion here, I believe this should be shown as part of every standard school curriculum, as well as to every PD. It would save lives.
Teacher here and that’s a good idea- government teachers should play some of these vids for the kids
This police officer is a decent man. This is how a police officer is suppose to behave. Protect people's rights.
I had a police officer years ago admit that he made a mistake and then tell me that he encouraged the use of recording devices by both the officer and the public. He said that he did his best but sometimes another perspective was helpful and that it kept both sides accountable. He also said that he and the officers he knew would be glad to wait until you had a video recording on your phone during a traffic stop before discussing the reason for pull over. Any public servant that is not ok with being filmed should find another profession.
'supposed'
Gorgui Yansane He sounds like smart officer, don’t create a problems to police department, somebody can receive a directions from this officer,congratulations.
You're an idiot if you actually believe that police in the United States are supposed to protect people's rights. You don't have a clue about how your country works.
@M. Stone I don't think that knowing who has power and who doesn't makes me special. I might be smarter than Gorgui Yansane, but I'm not special.
She wanted to arrest him for the sake of arresting him. She was more upset that he didn't follow her commands and wanted him to pay for it.
Yet, if she arrested him for not following a lawful order, the sergeant probably would have allowed the failure to obey charge.
Failure to obey is as ridiculous as being arrested for resisting arrest as the only charge.
@@ObservationofLimits Chris was detained after multiple people complained that they were concerned with his actions. Looking at what Chris looks like, a young kid, and seeing him just wandering around a retirement home... yeah I would worry what the kid is up to as well.
The cop asked him what he was doing. She ignored the cop. First mistake.
He made the cop upset... understandably. Cop simply asked him to stop and tell him why he was there. The "auditor" can simply say "exercising my first amendment" but he didnt because he wants the cop to question him... this is like reverse profiling. Purposefully making yourself look sketchy to get a cop to question you.
Then when he was finally detained, legally, he attempted to flee.
If you ignore a cop they can take your silence as guilt. If a cop shows up to a 17 year old kid wandering around a retirement home they dont belong in, and the kid then ignores the cop completely... yeah you just incriminated yourself.
cops, always the same
Ngl at the start of the video I favored the cop more, the guy was coming off a bit douchey
I absolutely despise when a cop says where’d you get your law degree as though it’s illegal for a citizen to be knowledgeable of their rights. Like why do they feel the need to go that route
It's called gaslighting, very common, you probably do it too.
@@maeth1935 not really. I try to have informed conversations with people. If I’m uneducated in the topic I simply listen and ask questions
Chris I believe is the civilians name and it is my understanding that Chris didn't have a good grasp of what Terry v. Ohio court case actually says. The supreme court ruled that a police officer cannot legally "stop and frisk" with reasonable suspicion, BUT if you are detained by police you must cooperate with them and Chris was not cooperating after he was detained. Chris was being rude right from the beginning by ignoring the requests of the police officer and it's only fair in my opinion for the sargent to be snarky towards him in return. It's a challenge, the sargent was challenging Chris's knowledge of the law because Chris was challenging another officer.
Knowing the law and exercising your constitutional rights without a law degree is against the law.
@@zach6074 yeah this is what I noticed too, plus the cops know him. Maybe he’s doing this kind of thing like everyday.
It’s amazing how many officers aren’t taught simple laws and rights. In the academy and as per apartment policy they should be forced to be made aware before put on duty
There is an incentive to NOT teach patrol officers the law. If the officer believes they are acting in good faith not only are they immune from reprisal but often their actions (illegal searches, for example) can be upheld. For that reason LE agencies have less reason to teach the law than to not.
we need more Sergeants like him in policing forces.
Too bad because they are all going and being replaced with pedo NWO dogs
all cops need to be like this sarg ,,,,, the USA would be a better place , Man hating Ugly woman cop just like the power ,,,,HAHAHA She was going to loose here shit a few times ,,,,, She is a 2 brown bag female ,,,, Always use 2 incase your bag falls off !
Hey, listen real quick. Your welcome.
C minus my ass F she is a fucking Tyrant and traitor to the flag.
@@13yearsaprepperr.jtilbury.51 Simply take 10 seconds to proofread your writing ~ or else sound like a 4th grader.
Kid: “Am I being detained?”
Officer: “yes”
Kid: “what crime?”
Officer:
Kid: 😐
5:36
The look he gave him was hilarious
Let him think for a second mates
Had me dead, man 😂
The kid made him look pretty stupid
the comment, the timestamp, the format. everything about this was fucking hilarious 😂 thank you
When cops are held accountable by their brothers and sisters who also wear the uniform, a lot of this b******* will stop
Good performance in his work habits awesome
She has been called by the residents, does he think the residents will be pleased if she said, "i called him, but he didn't answer, so i think he's fine". Anything can be legal, but doesn't mean it's ok. Help the police to help yourself, if you challenge a police, don't be shocked if they challenge you back.
Even the op said, detain can be made, based only from suspicion. Not every police is bad, dude, sometimes they just did what s/he instructed to. That's SOP, every workplace has it own SOP. For her, call-ask-(if you're silent) detain-(if you're proofed being guilty)say the miranda rights. After the miranda rights, yes, you have the rights to remain silent, but before miranda right, no, you're obstructing the justice. That's why it's stupid if you're being pulled over, then the police asked for your documents, you ignored them, and thought you're a chad. gbu 🙏
Cops have had ample time to change their ways. So, I say I can't see it happening as they have been doubling and tripling down on their illegal actions and arrogance despite mounds of evidence against them. If WE THE PEOPLE demand community oversight, transparency, and professionalism from the law enforcement departments which our tax dollars fund then change will happen. Just my opinion.....
Tgis will never going to happen. Only once lice. Is supervised by public inspectors that are interested in questioning what is going on and when they have powers to punish
Officer Holland showed no respect towards the young man, right from the get go.
Shes a young cop.. I strongly believe cops need better training.
There should also be no female cops, I mean come on.
Jonh Dew joke?
Jonh Dew I agree 100%
Jonh Dew well too damn bad
@@jonhdew3292 most of us think it, not many of us will say it.. 😁
As soon as he asked if he is doing anything illegal she calls for back up. Escalates things.
exactly, it's how cops are taught pretty much everywhere now. Here in UK same thing now, no longer 'police', just armed militia doing the bidding of criminal civilians whom claim to govern the country.
Of course they're going to call in back up dude human behavior can be unpredictable at times for all we know this guy could have came from an asylum recently if that's the case what's stopping him from just going crazy and stabbing you in the face this is what cops think about at times human behavior is very similar to animalistic behavior at times and can be unpredictable only if you know that particular person well is when you can actually predict their behavior and even then they might surprise you at times if this guy was under the influence of drugs anything could have happened especially if he was hiding a weapon of some sort cops don't have X-ray vision
@@KILLSWITCH14FP69 your point is void the second she decides to approach without back up. She obviously wasn't thinking that to begin with... good try though, you wont convince me otherwise. I have spent too many years working along side cops. Most of which liked to instigate and escalaye situations until they have legal justification to put hands on you. Unless its night and nobody is around. Then they just beat your ass and leave ya to your word against a cps in court.
So unnecessary. Why was she so accelerated, and stressed out? Cant be that she felt intimidated or overwhelmed by a teenager who could have been hearing impaired or mildly autistic.
Although there seems to be a degree of familiarity, she knew him personally and called him b his first name.... she did get involved personally, as if challenged or provoked by a teenie minding his own business for her inquiry. But she was presenting it wrong, if she wanted to deal with him in a more respecting way than patronizing him as many adults do with young adults or minors still. Why was she overwhelmed by such a flat out non-stressful situation, even if a pedestrian is not interested to open up about their non-crime activities.
@@pendragonU She appeared to me like a newer officer...the way she immediately began explaining herself to the other officer. Hopefully she will learn from this interaction and become a better officer.
It’s astounding to me how many actual police officers believe someone has committed an arrestable offense just because someone else is “disturbed“ or “offended“.
Which is why so many are based on race, gender, and other biases. An officer who likes iphones may be enraged by someone who worships android phones and so wants to lock them up.
That's actually how it works in UK
so the entire internet alot of the time. considering how theirs so many police interactions of poor interactions such as twitch streamers getting swatted, forceful arrests and other things. These things happens stupidly alot.
Me holding my urge to say women 😂😂😂
@@vihaan0072 You’re incontinent.
Right ON Sgt.!! This made my day. The other officer seemed like she was actively looking for trouble as well as wasting the public's time, money, and policing hours over petty nonsense. Soliciting charges smdh...
That 3 seconds of silence when he asks “what crime was I suspected of committing?” before looking at the officer absolutely killed me! 😂
lmao
Sgt. Stuart might've done the proper thing for the majority of this interaction, but that "wow, where'd you get your law degree" was snarkier than I'd expect from a PO towards a teen, even if the latter was def more arrogant than he should have been.
@@jarlhenrik Even though a bit unprofessional, at least he’s being realistic lol.
But at least he took the time to look into it, rather than ignorantly follow the arrest.
Same here bro 🤣🤣
Man, got em!! 😂😂😂😂
“You can be bothered by a lot of things, Sam”💀
this is pretty much many of society's problems summed up in that context. hurt feelings doesn't equal legal action.
@Jelani God true, facts don't care about feelings
@Keps one of my favorite saying ever. And feelings don’t trump liberties.
I’m bothered I can’t slide in your DMs
@@MrStatic156 😂🏆
She's the girl that obsessed over grades and reminded the teacher that there was homework
Dude I can see it.
“Ummm actually ms. there was a homework yesterday.”
The glasses sent me
Yup. 😂😂😂
True asf😂😂
I absolutely applaud this sergeant! We need MORE officers like him!! In response to Officer Dipstick saying "they were bothered by the videotaping", this wise sergeant responds "you can be bothered by a lot of things, Sam". YES!!! Outstanding! Holding another officer accountable for being utterly stupid and reckless when it comes to arresting someone.
"He was zooming in on the people" How does she know that? Even if he was, it's not illegal. She's making things up to substantiate her detainment.
Basically a cop created a problem and another one solv'it
As if there was people to zoom in on and all the blinds weren’t closed.. Also Sgt Stewart quickly informed me I was still being detained after just telling the Deputy I didn’t do anything illegal
@@ThisChris you were in all rights to film in public
Agustin Bernardo I agree, that’s why I don’t think the Sgt deserved an A+ but I understand
@@ThisChris
A call to a number, 911 constitutes as reasonable suspicion? Supreme court found this how? Do you have a link?
A cop going to see if they'll sign a complaint, 5:02 that's solicitation. Reasonable suspicion is not a phone call period. Anytime someone calls the police can say, that is a constitutional right. So your information sounds prejudicial.
The second cop failed to ask where this young man was. Did he go onto the Lutheran home property? He's on the sidewalk. Yes, I have seen this video before months ago. Holland was soliciting at the bequest of her supervisor. And you didn't comment at 5:02 when the male officer said he will hold the auditor while she goes to solicit the home to sign a complaint. We all appreciate that he finally gathered the information of where the auditor was and that he was never on their property. The auditor does have the right to remain silent. Because everything to the best of their ability WILL be used against him. Again, to ask WHERE he was would have shut this all down. The auditor was more correct than the male cop.
Not only did she fully intend to make an arrest, but she argued with her sergeant before he shut her down with "Yea well you can be bothered by a lot of things"
The cop we need
Nice last name. Hello from Ukraine
She's guilty of disorderly conduct, assãult, and false imprisonment. She should have been arrested on the spot and held without bail while awaiting trial since she is clearly a danger to the community.
Another case of undue entitlement
Why cant all supervisors do this. When they see a junior officer in the wrong simply correct them. That simple...
how do u know they don't? can u provide an example?
i'd rather see a junior officer correct a supervisor
@@韓国J Thomas Lane, a 4 day rookie, tried to warn Derek Chavin about George Floyd and we know how THAT turned out.
@@richardduran8345 that's one case
Hahaha it don't think she is doing this because she is new. If you were a decent person of officer you wouldn't just approach someone and do this, or at least i wouldn't. Shes doing it on purpose.
more like simply fire them...smh
The ending is the icing on the cake of this video.
Well said sir,
very well worded.
Wisdom...is a biggy.
“You can be bothered by a lot of things, Sam.” I love it
It was GOLD, poor Sam.
No doubt she's bothered by most things
Now they need to have that officer who got an A+ to do training nationwide.
They do this... everywhere. All you see is the officers that don’t follow through with their training.
Sad that that simple rare act of doing your job properly is so great. Should be like this always. Doing whats right. Cops need to be more involved with their sector they run. Have them clean the streets, mingle, yada yada. Instead of going for "points" and getting whoever they want , usually starting with obstruction or resistance when that is such a loose term in the mouth of a cop.
“I second that emotion!”-Smoky Robinson
They do :/
Suppose they can throw up breach of the peace
To be fair to officer Holland, she failed to learn both sides of the story mainly because the kid was acting like a jerk to her. She approached him with simple questions and the guy completely ignored her which is just plain rude. She only had a complained from 911 call and an asshole recording a building and disregarding her attempt to solve the given problem. He then kept asking what illegal thing he had been doing but that was exactly what she was trying to find out, what it was if anything.
“You can be bothered by a lot of things Sam”
C’mon Sgt. you didn’t have to do her like that 😂
some would say he is sexist
@@valfssantiago there are men who do this in a demeaning and condescending way, but he’s trying his best to get the point across to her that he’s not breaking any laws since she’s reluctant to accept that. They most likely had a discussion later where he had to reiterate that he meant “you” in general so as not to make it seem personal though lol.
@@sosmooth13 He definitely meant that in general, like you and me can be bothered by a lot of things that are not illegal haha
@@valfssantiago only idiots like you would
thats exactly what she needed smh, arresting someone for legal activities bases off a complaint xD
“You can be bothered by a lot of things, Sam.“ 😂😂😂👌
Oh my god..... when the camera showed her whole face, she looks like a WHOLE crazy ex
female think & act differently then males, there times that females can help, but put them out on the street & cut them lose from supervision,,, wow! Mendota is asking for law suits,,,,
john thompson I’m sorry but from this woman... your English isn’t there bud. Guess you better cut me loose now and throw me to the streets.
@@johnthompson5792 Any female is smarter than you judging by your use of the English language.
Mara 😂😂😂😂
@Art Life
You literally have the brain complexity of a hydrogen atom, silence you zygote.
Yay Sergeant Stewart! You’re awesome, brother. Thank you for being a professional!!!
"What are you doing, Chris?!?".....she sounds like his mom.
At first I thought she was a mom calling her kid in the background
Chris should have replied "I like it when you touch my arm like that" lol.
@D A ...and why are they hired??🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
I love how cops ask "Where'd you get your law degree?" As if they have one themselves.
It's not illegal to be an ass. Being an ass doesn't warrant a false arrest. Taking video from a sidewalk isn't 'suspicious activity'. I would say it's quite natural to be defensive or deflective when being detained for exercising your 1st amendment, imo I would go a step further and say knowing your innocent, and the cop having nothing but 'suspicion' warrants a 'in fear for my life' reponse given the track record, but I'm a bit extreme about my rights. If he was in the window with it sure? but was he NO, was it reported that he was NO, did he say that he was NO. So Release Him. Then toss 'i do what i feel' brunette in a cell for a couple months and strip her badge. REALLY your gonna cite mental health? She basically admitted she detained someone because someone else 'felt' they should. That's fucked up.
@@stiff2077 being an ass might not warrant a false arre
sorry for making the 'interent' dumber lmfao. Also I never addressed you once in my statement, I was making the clear point that a police officers job isn't to take action based on attitude received. Good job with your own paragraph though, even if the point went clear over yonder.
@@dennisivan85 Read it again. Believe it or not, the world doesn't revolve around you.
@@dennisivan85 Dude my entire comment was about the video, yes I used your 'ass' comment as an example, One Single TIME out of an entire paragraph, and still wasn't directed at you, not once. That doesn't make the entire paragraph about you, get the fuck over it. What is your obsession with me?
Are you that mad that you look like a stalker now? or what?
Get a damn life.
Why are you still here?
Like holy shit, I bet youre a damn blast at parties.
also do you have any idea what strawman is? because you trying to make this entire thing about you which was never my argument, and never defining what it is you're even arguing about is strawman you absolute buffoon. Now move on, go talk to some people in real life, and try to get better cause you popping off to strangers on youtube, and assuming you're the center of the world isn't all that healthy.
when he asked what crime he was suspected of committing and the cop said nothing the way he looked at the cop killed me
Dog
@@Xid. ?
dude i died!
@@EliDaName Dog
i know right i almost died maan ;..... the way he looked at him like im smart right ? lemme fucking go
why is she treating him like an ex lmao. "Chris? Stop walking away from me! Chris, what are you doing here??"
"You can be bothered by a lot of things, Sam" - brilliant
He should have added "Karen".
@Miss O’Genist i mean, if you think following the law makes people zealots then...thing about the law is that it doesn't matter how annoying or doofy someone is, they still deserve to not be hassled or charged with something when they're not breaking any law.
@Yuri Lopes some people wanna use cops as their personal attack dogs against anyone who bothers them.
Miss O’Genist he wasn’t in the right but if your siding with the woman that’s even worse.
I'm starting to think the Staff were only REALLY concerned about him AFTER Holland TOLD them some guy had been recording and wasn't answering her questions.
I don't know about you but I think we've got a Overzealot here..
"Chris, what are you doing?!"
"I'm working, Mom!"
Lol. I was thinking the same thing. They know his ass by name.
🤣🤣🤣
Haha haha, made me laugh.
5:44 that look he makes when he realizes the cops don’t even know why they detained him lmao
That Sgt is worth his weight in GOLD! If I had a dime for every bully POS cop I met in my life I would have an assload of dimes. Good on you, sir!
that's a lot of gold....
A lot of bad cops are sociopaths and psychopaths taking a easy way to get in...
Cop recruitment gets less strict and training less lengthy to out more feet on the ground sooner... Retraining isn't a common thing for American law enforcement.
You can say that the system gets filled with corruption because it cannot manage itself cleanly.
@@dra6o0n Well put, sir.
If i was a police officer in usa i would hand my badge in its not worth bothering anymore let crime go thru the roof then see what they do to recruit police
@@24299565 Sharia gangs, do look up that term. I think youtube erases keywords too on stuff like those.
"You could be bothered by a lot of things Sam". Good for that senior officer. You need to check incompetence like this with pure knowledge and logic. The way that he so blatantly laid it out for her like that really sent the point home for her
You can be bothered by a lot of things Karen
@@realspitter2727 that whole "Karen" thing is old.
@@goodmorningsundaymorning4533 did white women magically stop being Karens? it’s old because you identify with them and have them in your family. You won’t accept or admit that tho
@@realspitter2727 nah Karen has kinda just devolved from overuse. Like originally it was just entitled dumb white women with dumb haircuts but now it's just used as white woman that disagrees with me
@@IHateSmilingFriendsTheTVShow nah it’s the same as it’s always been. I understand why you’re triggered by it
I love it when a cop is all “Where’d you get your law degree?” or “Wow, you some kind of rights expert?”.
Like what, we’re not allowed to be knowledgable in how our country works?
Dude, the sergeant was right. As ATA pointed out, this kid didn't really fully understand a Terry stop. While misguided, Officer Dipstick did have reasonable suspicion to stop him, and his refusal to comply could have landed him in big trouble... You should be applauding this sergeant instead of defaulting to the anti-cop position. He de-escalated this situation, called out Officer Dipstick for the BS she was peddling, and said the wisest thing I've heard a cop say: "you can be bothered by a lot of things, Sam".
People forget that their feelings don't come before our Rights
👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
LOL tell that to nearly half the nation who to some degree suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome.
True but suspicious activity still cause for a temporary detainment. Js. But the sgt was right also.
She kinda held him a little too long
And if hes just an auditor then hes a piece of shit. People have things to do and cops do have to go check suspicious activity which uses up resources. However if hes just documenting things for possible court later than hell ya.
No auditors are doing anything illegal. But at what point are you just a pest to those actually trying to do their job and help real situations
Christopher Brewer you did know what to say. You somehow brought Trump into this.
Until those feelings decide to take action.
Same reason there is free speech. But people are not free from consequences from that speech.
"where did you get your law degree" ... My response would be " do I need a degree to know my rights"
Actually, alot people don't know what rights they have and they just spew them up. Rights are rights granted by the law of the country and in the un declaration of human rights if the country sign it. Anything not on this two lists is not legally a right. Choosing not to stop when ordered by an officer is not within his rights. Choosing to remain his silence is within his rights but it is also within the officer rights to detain him until they get further information. What the Sgt and this video explain that if he has just cooperated, the situation would deescalate very quickly. Everyone exercise their rights properly and everyone goes on their merry way. As a first amendment auditor, he should know his laws before attempting this social movement. But he didn't and hence why the Sgt have that sarcastic remark cos he doesn't know his rights, he just claimed he has the right not to be questioned or detained when ordered to stop by an law enforcement officer, which is not his rights. The officer is wrong to not properly investigate the situation and escalate the situation but it is within her rights to stop a person if someone is acting suspiciously. The man in question, is exercising a first amendment audit - that is already intentionally acting in suspicious. If he just informed his intention, done. Nothing goes wrong. The video explained all of it
I would also like to know where the cop got his law degree
"My response would be " do I need a degree to know my rights"
It's an especially stupid question because the cop himself doesn't have a law degree either. His own retarded logic disqualifies him from being a cop.
"Actually, alot people don't know what rights they have "
Including you.
@@cymjeff92 have you read the 9th amendment of the Constitution? It literally exists to dispell statements like yours
That seargant was on his game. To him, justice and public faith was more important than his ego.
Lmao no. Chris is well known by the debt and they are trying to avoid a lawsuit
This was a very satisfying analysis. I am liking this channel more.
This is an educated Sergeant. I’m glad he stepped in.
But would he have done the same if the person was of color? Great cops act the same regardless of color when these things happen! Ijs!
That's why hes a sergeant
I love how he said "you can be bothered by alot of things sam"
She doesn't seem competent to become a police officer if that is the case.
@@christiangonzales7429 pretty sure he meant "you" as in the general you. IE - people can be bothered by a lot of things, that doesn't mean all of them should call the police or all hose things are illegal.
10:24 👍
@@idave4900 10:19 she says "they said they were bothered by-" to which he cuts her off with "You can be bothered by a lot of things sam". Take the whole conversation as context like you would if you were talking with someone, not just that one specific snippet
@@TheKapowzl totally agree
It sounds like this dude is just trying to piss off his sister
It does seem like they have a good bit of previous history. Probably went to school together.
@@Gryffyth_Aurum yeah, i thought the same. she's using his name.
She's more than likely attempted to squelch his freedoms before. More than once.
Too bad for her that the sarge won't be having any part of her 'detainment' of a public photographer 'rightfully' going about his day.
The code enforcing, policy enforcing, law enforcing tyrants will continue to 'get the lesson' until they 'get the lesson'.
Why are you in my room chris have I committed a crime...so are you telling me to get out 🤣🤣
@@Past_10 😂😂 exactly 😂😂
WHERE did he get his law degree SOMEWHERE BETTER than you !
SHE SHOULD NOT BE A POLICE OFFICER, THE LAW IS NOT ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS
China Expat true
@Smiley Junior THAT'S IT EXACTLY, THE BLUE WALL MENTALITY DRIVES OUT OR DISSUADES GOOD OFFICERS
@Smiley Junior - How on Earth is she a sjw??? However you feel about the people that you describe as 'SJWs', they are almost uniformly against abuse of police power. It tends to be rightwing nutjobs that support this type of behavior.
“I feel like you shouldn’t be he..” shut the fuck up
@@Codex7777 NOT TRUE (NOT SAYING SHE'S A SJW) BUT SJW'S ARE FOR ABUSE OF POWER IF YOU HAVE THE WRONG OPINION. IF YOU PROTEST GAY MARRIAGE WITH A LEGAL PERMIT THEY'D WANT THE POLICE TO END IT BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. THERE WAS A SORY A WHILE BACK, 2 GUYS SET UP AN ABORTION IS MURDER THING (NOT REALLY A PROTEST) AND A FAT SJW PHYSICALLY STARTED ATTACKING THEM AND CHASING THEM TO A BUS. SJW HAVE NO PRINCIPLES
"did I do anything illegal?"
A question that a cop should be able to answer IMHO.
"That's what I'm trying to determine".
@@theindooroutdoorsman Ah, when investigation begins. Unclear and uncertain...
I hate that answer (civvie speaking).
Cop answered with "but you hurt the old peoples feefees" welcome to 2021 where feelings now carry the weight of law depending on how educated the officer you encounter is...
I didn't know you had to activate your rights like a Yu gi oh trap card
"YEAH THATS RIGHT, ILL EVEN SACRIFICE MY RIGHTS"
I have no idea what your talking about, but i get the just and it makes me laugh.
@@shadowhog6104 when kaiba said something like "I'll even sacrifice god" not sure if those were his exact words or not tho
Never forget that invoking your 5th amendment right is spell speed 2
You invoke your rights like casting a spell
Great videos. I just added you to my Patreon and happy to support your work going forward!
5:36 "What crime was I suspected for?" The look on his face when the police officer started to hesitate.
Thats what we call "The Mic Drop"
The way he turned to look at him was hilarious
@@odensxn ikr lol 😂
He said 🗿
5:45 the question asked & head turned looking 👀 for response. ATA covers it's only suspicion necessary for detention. Also, officer need not disclose to suspect what was suspicious.
Sam looks like that annoying girl in class who wants to be the teachers pet🙄
She needs a sandwich or donut or something.
Busy body nagging Nancy
She is going to be a problem for this dept.She gets an F
I bet you can relate to getting F's. Lots of them.
Wow, I remember my first joke.
@@mara8456 My notes said you gave me a heart-eyes smiley, but I can't find it anywhere and I'm just letting you know I saw it, and thank you.
Is it not true that old folks are always in danger from abusive nursing home works. So, if an old citizens advocate is investigating such places then the complaining people are most likely the abusers.
She looks like someone who got bullied in school so she became a cop
My thoughts exactly.
Like alot of cops do.
@Cody Jarrett 🤣
It's dangerous to test it out on a cop like that ! They might just pull it out and blast you and where are you then? DEAD!
Howdy Partners And you were bullied by the Crossing Guard in school?
The staff of the home were likely afraid he would see one of them smacking a mentally challenged cripple.
What evidence do you have that that particular establishment has staff that carry out such actions?
Macho Machin
I agree, I wasn’t commenting on the video. I was asking what proof Rick Mason has proving that staff in the home are abusing residents.
Would of expected a more intelligent argument than “oh shut up”
I asked a civilized and intelligent question.
@@neilgoulsbra7103 it is a good point though....i know the facility my mom works at anyone can go visit any resident..... So why are they worried about him?
@Macho Machin oh really so you have no problem someone videotaping through your window all day at your home? Get the f*** out of here man you guys are such hypocrites
@@neilgoulsbra7103 well I guess if the cops can just presume I'll intent so can the rest of us. Right?