Yeah, I don't understand how anyone could say Morphy wasn't a master-level player. I would say he could compete with 2700-level players today if he was given time to learn modern theory.
Stupid, small-minded people enjoy pushing geniuses aside. Such a pity. To my mind, Morphy was not only one of the only true chess geniuses and the greatest player to ever live; Morphy was the first true world champion with the title of 'greatest player in the world', years before, having beaten pretty much everybody of the west almost completely with ease, clearly able to beat the first world chess champion, and having held records of 'first modern chess player', and having held the record in blindfold sims, but he was also one of the world's greatest geniuses of any field -- not just chess. You may have all heard, by now, about Magnus being 'the Mozart of chess' -- no, no, Morphy was the Mozart of chess!
You have to take into account that the Internet is very USA biased. I suspect that he would not be in the top 30 Russian players of all time for example. But seriously. who cares. Just enjoy the games. I agree though Archimedes... definitely up there.
Exactly! Tens of thousands of college students become reasonably good at calculus every year, but only because Newton and Leibniz developed the techniques in the seventeenth century! Do we say that Newton and Leibniz weren't that great because college students can do that stuff now?
Why did you cut out the random rambling? It's not like we're here to learn chess. Everyone who watches these videos knows that their chess is hopeless, so we're here just for the rambling, which you cut out. Terrible!
Morphy was literally finding moves that engines can only find with a depth of 31, and he was making these calculations in less than 15 minutes. Enough said.
Not fifteen but less than five. In those days times only more than five were recorded. I believe there is only one instance of Morphy vs Paulsen where he took about twelve minutes. He usually blitzed which is quite fast even by today's standards.his opponents took a lot of time even hours which frustrated him.
No one can evaluate Morphy's level properly against today's standards. To pretend it can be done is beyond absurd. Morphy learned the game as a child just by watching his father and uncle play. By 9 he was the strongest player in New Orleans. He also *retired* at the age of 22 (!!!) after playing occasionally at a time before any of the chess theory that came in the last 150 years (!) He was undoubtably the strongest player in the world in his time. That was one incredibly unusual *talent* .
The argument that Morphy would destroy Magnus is possibly just as silly as the argument that Morphy couldn't compete with modern chess players. Talent is as talent does, and Morphy laid the grounds for modern chess as it is
@@loganmyall660 Morphy would right up there with Magnus today because it only makes sense. In a world where Morphy's unique mind got the same exposure to chess ideals as Magnus he would be just as good same goes for Capablanca and other geniuses of the past theyd all be 2800 in this time and maybe in 200 years theres a person who is 3000 strength, Morphy would be 3000 in that time
Comparing eras is futile. There's no way to know. It is possible that he wouldn't be as good because chess requires some different skills today than 100 years ago. It doesn't matter what your talent level is, in this era of engines a player has no chance at the top level if they don't have both a strong memory and work ethic to study deep engine preparation. It's likely Morphy would be good but it's not a guarantee that he would be a top X player.
Instead of censoring the video you should post a disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this video are those of GM Finegold and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any member of the Chess Club and Scholastic Center in Saint Louis.
Chess Club and Scholastic Center of Saint Louis the editor is a neo con douchebag, is there somewhere i can watch these uncensored? the right leaning bias is pretty gross.
The current players are always the most accurate players. For example in 15 years the world number 1 will be playing better chess than the any player before that because of engines and preparation improving. Morphy wasn't even close to the most accurate. Every grandmaster today is more accurate than Morphy. Fischer was more accurate than Morphy since he was more modern than Morphy, but still no where guys today. That said, they were two of the most talented players ever, they just played in different times.
THANK YOU BEN FINEGOLD for defending the honor of the great Paul Morphy! Saying Morphy would lose to an average player today is like saying Newton couldn't pass a current physics exam. There have been developments in Physics since Newton's time so he would have to spend some time LEARNING them in order to pass the test. But once he learned them, he would blow the doors off the average physics student. If Paul Morphy came up today and had the same tools and research available to him that others players do, his undeniable genius would soon show and he would be one of the best if not the best. Ben is actually the best! Love your commentary, and your common sense!
Paul Morphy may have been the #1 most advanced player to ever play chess; furthermore, Morphy may have been the most beautiful chess artist ever, and it was 8th World Champion Tal that said "Chess, first of all, is art."
I love your comments about Morphy. It amazes me how people can downplay a guy who probably had more natural talent and creative genius than many of the players even in the 2000 range
What people need to understand is Morphy a lot of times played troll openings and moves, like this game, on purpose. He was so far ahead of everyone else, he simply could do anything he wanted to. Against much tougher opposition, he'd adjust his moves according.
Morphy was a great, great talent. If he lived today he would make use of all the tools that other current players use and that is the only fair way to think about it.
@@camreese We just have no idea how he would do, so it's not accurate to even try to compare him to Magnus. Chess is a completely different game today, and he would be a completely different player. You can't really accurately compare any past players to each other. It's even harder with a guy as far back as Morphy.
Morphy gave up as he already had beaten the best their was....he was limitied by the knowledge available of his time...had he continued or even really decided to pour himself into the chess as say fischer or many others have, we would have seen a monster. Just consider the thought
@@BigChunk4530 i think the point is that we *did* see a monster. a GOAT can only be measured against contemporaneous competition. with the possible and very brief exception of fischer, nobody dominated his peers the way morphy did.
Fischer knew how good Morphy was and I trust Fischers opinion over any idiots today. Also didn't Morphy have a near photgenic memory? I suspect hed be one of the best at remembering computer lines in todays age as well
To say Morphy was bad isnt even funny as part of a joke. Back in those days, every move after-say move 5 was like entering the frontier. Or, like my countryman Nansen, going towards the north pole on a pair of wooden skis having 500.000km^2 ahead of him nobody knew shit about. And Morphy does it blindfolded in a simultane game. As blindfolding and simu games mattered to him. That guy was just incredible. On an equal footing he would problably crush every GM today also
I agree if you took many of the strongest GMS and put them in morphys time with the resources he had he would crush them and if you would be able to do the same and take more free and put him in our era he would probably be at least as good as Carlsen if not better
27:10 "We have lives outside the chess club" Yes, we know, and that is the problem. Couln't you all just stop doing this silly living thingy, and get us more videos. Thanks!
YES!!!!!!! FRIDAY FRIDAY! Woot, Friday with ben, Life can't get any better. What creates happiness? "A good bank account, good digestion, and GM Ben Finegold". BTW, don't ever edit what ben says or does. Ben is my chess guru, and his word his law. I am subscribed because of ben + chess... not chess by itself.
Damn straight GM Finegold. Morphy would destroy any master in a match. I laugh when people say, "Morphy would have trouble beating a master these days because today the masters know a lot of opening theory." My reply, "The problem with that logic is that not knowing theory would benefit Morphy because he would quickly take the modern master out of his book. Morphy's excellent chess talent plus his ability to coordinate his pieces and see tactics would soon dismantle a modern master. The superior player will win a match against any booked up player because the booked up player soon runs out of book moves and will play like a patzer compared to a player like Morphy."
Bobby Fischer: "A popularly held theory about Paul Morphy is that if he returned to the chess world today and played our best contemporary players, he would come out the loser. Nothing is further from the truth. In a set match, Morphy would beat anybody alive today." Enough said. You can believe idiots or you can believe a world champion like Fischer. It's your choice. If it's chess, Fischer knows what he is talking about.
lovetownsend 1) He was not crazy. 2) If it's chess he knows what he is talking about. Do you prefer to believe what chess Grandmasters are saying or do you prefer to believe patzer idiots?
I don't see any problem in Ben being non-neutral. Also, his neutrality is nothing to be proud of even if that was the case! You could easily write a disclaimer under the video if that was really important to you. Your club is not bigger or more popular than Cavs and LeBron, right? Look what he did today.
He's very PC. He'd be homeless if he wasn't since his income is based entirely around teaching chess and he'd be run out of town by all the tolerant people.
Fischer said : A popularly held theory about Morphy is that if he returned to the chess world today and played our best contemporary players, he would come out the loser. Nothing is further from the truth. In a set match, Morphy would beat anybody alive today.
i've seen a lot of paul morphy games n find that his strategy was excellent way beyond his time.. the way he blocks his opponents frm developing then using his strongly developed pieces to crush the kings defences are awesome.. many players of today readily agree to a draw.. rather than go all out for the kill..
edward bedrosian Hm it seems to me, if he had to write out his statement himself he would read "read your comments, they were very insightful, they incite violence." (Roughly) Why does spelling incite correctly lose the joke?
Watching Morphy chess games on UA-cam, I remember two things, #1. Development is everything and #2. Morphy says, "I am not a butcher" which means when you have a good move, you look for a better move. You do not just waste our tempo gathering material when there is a stronger move to help you win the game.
Do people not realize if you simply gave people like capablanca and morphy just a bit of time to study modern theory, they’d be at the top today? Think about it, they got their chess skill without the shit we have today. Can you imagine how strong they might be if they were given the opportunity to remove their weaknesses in theory with modern knowledge? Shit, I’d go far to say that if you put all the greatest players of all time (including the ones we have today) in a chess960 tournament, the guys in the past would come out on top!!!!
you're absolutly right ... the talent Capa and Paul had was just so up there ... modern theory is just something to learn ... i bet if they were alive they'd be top 5
The strongest chess player of HIS DAY wasn't strong? Certainly an Arrogant title, especially now that top level chess players are on "Chess Engine Steroids" comparatively. It's easy to use a chess computer and memorize lines and refutations... which is what prompted Bobby Fischer to challenge all of these so called GM's to "Random Chess" (Chess 960)... With no theory to memorize and no computer to act as Steroids, let's see who's "Strong" then.
One of the many great things about Ben's lectures is that he never says the annoyingly overused phrase 'a move like'. Not even when there is more than one option for the move. You would never catch him saying something like 'The ruy lopez begins with a move like e4'.
remember when Norm said to Adam Eget "That's the college you went to, right? If I remember correctly, to study animal husbandry... oh no that was your hobby. 😂you fkn animal"
Exactly, most players think that the rating system is absolute. Imagine their distress when I point out otherwise and when they google it they find I am correct.
The FIDE ratings were already inflating at a slow rate before Arpad Elo left. After he left, it was in 1985 I think, then the ratings really started to inflate quickly. If you converted Fischer's rating from after he destroyed Taimanov, Larsen, and Petrosian to now it would probably be about equal to Carlsen's. Well he didn't really destroy Petrosian but he clearly dominated him in the match. Taimanov and Larsen he beat 6-0, that's unbelieveable. After Fischer won the world championship he quit competing. Maybe he would have increased his playing strength even more who knows?
Ben, please don't pay attention to what some people say. Your lectures are always very instructive mixed with sharp humour... So, keep up a good work!!! BTW, I entirely agree with you, Paul Morphy was the greatest player ever lived.
16:30 White gain time Black try bf6 idea theory ıf Black play bf6 White need play Qd2 other moves intersting too 17:00 this move popular by some masters it's book move After f6 Black have very bad bishop too
I'd bet money that in the bit after 6:30 that got censored, he said something like: "and that's why you guys vote for trump, because you think you're in the center, but you're actually to the right. "
liam314 its because the owner of the chess club is also local head of his KKK chapter. it doesn't get more alt-right, neo-con than that. so obviously anything that isn't a nazi salute or strictly relating to chess is edited out.
Considering former World Champion Bobby Fischer, who had the greatest 1-year performance rating in history, considered Morphy the greatest player of all time, I don't think anyone has to "refute" the bad claim he wouldn't be a master today. In my younger days, I was on the edge of a master rating (2116, 2200 = master), and I was amazed at some of moves Morphy made when reviewing his games.
Another excellent video, Ben. Thanks for using your wit, sarcasm, and charm to the fullest to lay waste to such a silly idea. Excellent presentation, in general. Cheers!
Do you remember crossing the border into Canada, with your father and brother, in the late 70s or early 80's? You played in weekend tournaments, at the downtown YMCA? We met at one of those tournaments.
I hate people who say things like Morphy wouldn't be a super gm or Bill Russell wouldn't be good in the current NBA. That shit's just crazy. Deep set fundamental knowledge will make someone competitive regardless of the era.
Paul morphy is the goat... just look at the 2nd game he played bilndfolded at age 9!!! Fischer and capablanca and anderson said that morphy was the goat🐐
I've noticed that in every Morphy game I've seen, Morphy had white and the player with black played a very dubious defense. So, maybe Morphy wasn't so great. Maybe his opponents just got a bad opening and were never able to recover from it. The competition back then wasn't even close to what it is today (or even to what it was 50 years ago). Heck, I could probably even beat some of those guys that Morphy beat. It's possible that Morphy was only around 2500 and his opponents were only around 1700 players.
It's not about how the opponent played it's about the skill of Morphy. When Carlsen destroys weak players he still plays strong chess. The strength of the opponent is irrelevant.
People that say morphy wasn't very good are typically lower rated gms and ims...and they say it because they have an ego and overestimate their own abilities and downplay players from the past. If you'll notice, super gms almost always praise morphy. Don't ask what morphy would do today, ask what the people who say he isn't very good would do in morphys days...they would get crushed
Saying Paul Morphy was not a strong chess player is like saying Archimedes was not a good Mathematician.
Yeah, I don't understand how anyone could say Morphy wasn't a master-level player. I would say he could compete with 2700-level players today if he was given time to learn modern theory.
Amen brother. discussion is over.
Stupid, small-minded people enjoy pushing geniuses aside. Such a pity.
To my mind, Morphy was not only one of the only true chess geniuses and the greatest player to ever live; Morphy was the first true world champion with the title of 'greatest player in the world', years before, having beaten pretty much everybody of the west almost completely with ease, clearly able to beat the first world chess champion, and having held records of 'first modern chess player', and having held the record in blindfold sims, but he was also one of the world's greatest geniuses of any field -- not just chess.
You may have all heard, by now, about Magnus being 'the Mozart of chess' -- no, no, Morphy was the Mozart of chess!
You have to take into account that the Internet is very USA biased. I suspect that he would not be in the top 30 Russian players of all time for example. But seriously. who cares. Just enjoy the games. I agree though Archimedes... definitely up there.
Exactly! Tens of thousands of college students become reasonably good at calculus every year, but only because Newton and Leibniz developed the techniques in the seventeenth century! Do we say that Newton and Leibniz weren't that great because college students can do that stuff now?
"All 2100 players give blindfold simuls." I love this guy.
he is super funny
Yeah, mr Red Shirt is an idiot. Nuff said.
That's all they ever do.
@@SrinivashM29 Asa 2103 FIDE, I can comfirm that's all I ever do.
@tomekduresov706 sadly I'm a few hundred points lower but if I ever get there, that's what I'll do all day every day.
Why did you cut out the random rambling? It's not like we're here to learn chess. Everyone who watches these videos knows that their chess is hopeless, so we're here just for the rambling, which you cut out. Terrible!
bc it was trump rambling maybe
If it's jokes they shouldn't cut it out imo...
They should post an uncensored version
lol
SLCC so deluded they think we are here for any reason other than daddy finegold. Terrible!
Morphy was literally finding moves that engines can only find with a depth of 31, and he was making these calculations in less than 15 minutes. Enough said.
Not fifteen but less than five. In those days times only more than five were recorded. I believe there is only one instance of Morphy vs Paulsen where he took about twelve minutes. He usually blitzed which is quite fast even by today's standards.his opponents took a lot of time even hours which frustrated him.
Im a big morphy fan but lets not overexaggerate... nobody, ever can do that...
@@ryoma1412 Paul Morphy can
paul morphy was surely better than stockfish at depth 20, ye ye
@@ryoma1412 yeah it’s intuition. No one is calculating 30 moves deep with any reasonable amount of time, except maybe in end games
No one can evaluate Morphy's level properly against today's standards. To pretend it can be done is beyond absurd.
Morphy learned the game as a child just by watching his father and uncle play. By 9 he was the strongest player in New Orleans.
He also *retired* at the age of 22 (!!!) after playing occasionally at a time before any of the chess theory that came in the last 150 years (!)
He was undoubtably the strongest player in the world in his time. That was one incredibly unusual *talent* .
The argument that Morphy would destroy Magnus is possibly just as silly as the argument that Morphy couldn't compete with modern chess players. Talent is as talent does, and Morphy laid the grounds for modern chess as it is
@@loganmyall660 Morphy would right up there with Magnus today because it only makes sense. In a world where Morphy's unique mind got the same exposure to chess ideals as Magnus he would be just as good same goes for Capablanca and other geniuses of the past theyd all be 2800 in this time and maybe in 200 years theres a person who is 3000 strength, Morphy would be 3000 in that time
Comparing eras is futile. There's no way to know. It is possible that he wouldn't be as good because chess requires some different skills today than 100 years ago. It doesn't matter what your talent level is, in this era of engines a player has no chance at the top level if they don't have both a strong memory and work ethic to study deep engine preparation. It's likely Morphy would be good but it's not a guarantee that he would be a top X player.
@@cwjalexx what if morphy learned modern theory?
It was almost alien-like the level he had.
Never censor Ben.
Always censor Ben.
We don't know which one is easier!
Instead of censoring the video you should post a disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed in this video are those of GM Finegold and do not
necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any member of the Chess Club and Scholastic Center in Saint Louis.
You really shouldn't censor the guy though. For real.
Terrible. Never censor Ben.
Abusing audience: OK
Random tangent: Censored
You got it!
lmfao
Chess Club and Scholastic Center of Saint Louis the editor is a neo con douchebag, is there somewhere i can watch these uncensored? the right leaning bias is pretty gross.
Particularly abusive to the "at home" audience in this one. Oh, and btw, I do believe I'm playing you on Chess.com right now!
@Daniel Burke The truth hurts.
Fischer said Morphy was the most accurate chess player in history
Strong endorsement from another chess genius
i need to get a collection of Morphy games be good for my chess im sure
The current players are always the most accurate players. For example in 15 years the world number 1 will be playing better chess than the any player before that because of engines and preparation improving. Morphy wasn't even close to the most accurate. Every grandmaster today is more accurate than Morphy. Fischer was more accurate than Morphy since he was more modern than Morphy, but still no where guys today. That said, they were two of the most talented players ever, they just played in different times.
THANK YOU BEN FINEGOLD for defending the honor of the great Paul Morphy! Saying Morphy would lose to an average player today is like saying Newton couldn't pass a current physics exam. There have been developments in Physics since Newton's time so he would have to spend some time LEARNING them in order to pass the test. But once he learned them, he would blow the doors off the average physics student.
If Paul Morphy came up today and had the same tools and research available to him that others players do, his undeniable genius would soon show and he would be one of the best if not the best. Ben is actually the best! Love your commentary, and your common sense!
Paul Morphy may have been the #1 most advanced player to ever play chess; furthermore, Morphy may have been the most beautiful chess artist ever, and it was 8th World Champion Tal that said "Chess, first of all, is art."
Morphy may be the greatest genius in chess history.
The only reason I'm subscribed to this channel is Ben Finegold
Seirawan is worth too see also. And Akobian makes great videos sometimes too.
Ben is definitely the draw for me too. I enjoy Yasser and Schranz too, though.
I am not sure about Seirawan. I wouldn't subscribe to a Yasser channel.
Yes, subscribe at the begining of Finegold Season, unsubscribe at season finale.
theinstigatorr same
Sounds like Ben is getting censored every time he makes a Trump statement.
The censoring is so annoying ,_,
Good video. Hope Friedel sees it :)
Austin Smith Finegold is shook! Get with the program Ben we're MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Ben isn't an idiot. He voted for Bernie.
I think we should have an entire politics themed chess lecture from Ben
> Ben isn't an idiot. He voted for Bernie.
Now there's a self contradicting statement.
So much of Ben's random rambling cut out... terrible
I love your comments about Morphy. It amazes me how people can downplay a guy who probably had more natural talent and creative genius than many of the players even in the 2000 range
Than all players maybe
What people need to understand is Morphy a lot of times played troll openings and moves, like this game, on purpose. He was so far ahead of everyone else, he simply could do anything he wanted to. Against much tougher opposition, he'd adjust his moves according.
For sure don't edit Ben Finegold.. Every Finegold moment is a good moment.
Hey Ben Simon: HATEYA
Morphy was a great, great talent. If he lived today he would make use of all the tools that other current players use and that is the only fair way to think about it.
And with those tools he would be as good as Magnus. Its unfair to say hed be better and its disrespectful to say hed be worse
May be Greatest genius in history of chess.
@@camreesehe would be better than Magnus probably.
@@camreese We just have no idea how he would do, so it's not accurate to even try to compare him to Magnus. Chess is a completely different game today, and he would be a completely different player. You can't really accurately compare any past players to each other. It's even harder with a guy as far back as Morphy.
The rambling is the best part of these. Love the chess, love Ben! Leave it uncut :)
Ben Finegold is an awesome chess teacher. He is probably the only one I can listen too for longer than half an hour. Very interesting person
lots of weird edits. very suspicious.
very trumpicius ;)
These are super instructive games. Hard to believe these occurred so long ago and there is any doubt how great Morphy was.
why there are so many edits, we like ben's trash talking !! please don't remove them
Boooo for mister censor who ever did that
Which bu?
to say "morphy would be a 2100 player today" is about as phenomenally stupid as saying "ty cobb would be a double-A player today."
2100 level advanced level chess but morphy rating is so high 2700 edo
Morphy gave up as he already had beaten the best their was....he was limitied by the knowledge available of his time...had he continued or even really decided to pour himself into the chess as say fischer or many others have, we would have seen a monster. Just consider the thought
@@BigChunk4530 i think the point is that we *did* see a monster. a GOAT can only be measured against contemporaneous competition. with the possible and very brief exception of fischer, nobody dominated his peers the way morphy did.
Fischer knew how good Morphy was and I trust Fischers opinion over any idiots today. Also didn't Morphy have a near photgenic memory? I suspect hed be one of the best at remembering computer lines in todays age as well
To say Morphy was bad isnt even funny as part of a joke. Back in those days, every move after-say move 5 was like entering the frontier. Or, like my countryman Nansen, going towards the north pole on a pair of wooden skis having 500.000km^2 ahead of him nobody knew shit about. And Morphy does it blindfolded in a simultane game. As blindfolding and simu games mattered to him. That guy was just incredible. On an equal footing he would problably crush every GM today also
Good analogy.
I agree if you took many of the strongest GMS and put them in morphys time with the resources he had he would crush them and if you would be able to do the same and take more free and put him in our era he would probably be at least as good as Carlsen if not better
Wtf I want to see ALL the video! let Ben say what ever he wants to say! please stop editing
the kids must be so mind fucked half the time listening to ben haha
This is not the kids class
Those kids should know better
Obviously, Morphy had a fotographic memory, playing blinded 8 players simultaneous like this! Incredible!
literally went to grab a beer as ben said someone at home went for a drink ben truly is a wizard KING BEN
I hate that Grand Master Finegold was censored. I love his videos and love his humor!
@Truth Hertz You had to dig up a post from SIX years ago and that is the best you can come up with? *snicker* Wow.
@@Spiritbro77 What'd he say? lmao
@@lukasg4807 A disparaging remark about the orange madman...
Who's this messing with the edit? Don't mess with mah Finegold
27:10
"We have lives outside the chess club"
Yes, we know, and that is the problem. Couln't you all just stop doing this silly living thingy, and get us more videos.
Thanks!
YES!!!!!!! FRIDAY FRIDAY! Woot, Friday with ben, Life can't get any better. What creates happiness? "A good bank account, good digestion, and GM Ben Finegold".
BTW, don't ever edit what ben says or does. Ben is my chess guru, and his word his law. I am subscribed because of ben + chess... not chess by itself.
Ben defends again with a Morphy lecture and GM Friedel is no longer rooming with him - we'll be back next week with the Real House-GMs of St. Louis.
Nice moving around, Ben. I especially liked your hands.
He was moving around because he is the rotating GM.
Since Ben says he reads the comments.. Please, reupload your great videos that you had on your channel!
Damn straight GM Finegold. Morphy would destroy any master in a match. I laugh when people say, "Morphy would have trouble beating a master these days because today the masters know a lot of opening theory." My reply, "The problem with that logic is that not knowing theory would benefit Morphy because he would quickly take the modern master out of his book. Morphy's excellent chess talent plus his ability to coordinate his pieces and see tactics would soon dismantle a modern master. The superior player will win a match against any booked up player because the booked up player soon runs out of book moves and will play like a patzer compared to a player like Morphy."
defend morphy all you want, but i know a game where morphy was spotted a knight and got checkmated in 18 moves. it was Alonzo morphy, but still
not even 30 minutes, very risky
and suspicious
hardi mawan terrible !!!
Urgh!
Bobby Fischer: "A popularly held theory about Paul Morphy is that if he returned to the chess world today and played our best contemporary players, he would come out the loser. Nothing is further from the truth. In a set match, Morphy would beat anybody alive today."
Enough said. You can believe idiots or you can believe a world champion like Fischer. It's your choice. If it's chess, Fischer knows what he is talking about.
Fisher was also fuking crazy.
:p no im just kidding. well...actually im not but you know what I mean lol
lovetownsend 1) He was not crazy. 2) If it's chess he knows what he is talking about.
Do you prefer to believe what chess Grandmasters are saying or do you prefer to believe patzer idiots?
lovetownsend so was morphy
YtubeUserr tbf Fischer was a little luney
YtubeUserr and since you claim he wasn't then i have a rather simple refutation: bxh2
No Trump jokes?! Very suspicious! ;)
We're very proud of Ben for remaining so politically neutral. Thanks for watching.
;)
Chess Club and Scholastic Center of Saint Louis Pathetic: actually *censoring* your only talented lecturer? Grow up
yeh. CCSCSL grow up. I want Ben videos without this nonsense 1000 cuts.
I don't see any problem in Ben being non-neutral. Also, his neutrality is nothing to be proud of even if that was the case! You could easily write a disclaimer under the video if that was really important to you. Your club is not bigger or more popular than Cavs and LeBron, right? Look what he did today.
Finegold proves that chess and comedy are a perfect match!
Ben makes the most entertaining chess lectures. I don't hate when it happens.
It’s refreshing to see and hear a spontaneous, real, non-pc presenter who doesn’t sweet talk his audience.
He's very PC. He'd be homeless if he wasn't since his income is based entirely around teaching chess and he'd be run out of town by all the tolerant people.
Fischer said : A popularly held theory about Morphy is that if he returned to the chess world today and played our best contemporary players, he would come out the loser. Nothing is further from the truth. In a set match, Morphy would beat anybody alive today.
i've seen a lot of paul morphy games n find that his strategy was excellent way beyond his time.. the way he blocks his opponents frm developing then using his strongly developed pieces to crush the kings defences are awesome.. many players of today readily agree to a draw.. rather than go all out for the kill..
Your comments are insightful
They Insight Violence
lol...
Always love Ben Finegold lectures.
incite*
andrew not getting the joke
edward bedrosian Hm it seems to me, if he had to write out his statement himself he would read "read your comments, they were very insightful, they incite violence." (Roughly)
Why does spelling incite correctly lose the joke?
Really enjoying these videos. My chess has gotten much better as well. Thanks much, keep cranking them out!
You censored the best entertainer you have.
Shame on you, Saint Louis.
Suggestion for future videos: Karpov's Caro Kann (not necessarily karpov variation, but games where karpov plays the caro).
Im sooooo happy he's back!!!!!
I like how well he analyses games and combines it with a nice bit of humour
Morphy formation (Nd2) popular after 75-80 years later
Good to see you back. Please upload more Morphy games.
Watching Morphy chess games on UA-cam, I remember two things, #1. Development is everything and #2. Morphy says, "I am not a butcher" which means when you have a good move, you look for a better move. You do not just waste our tempo gathering material when there is a stronger move to help you win the game.
What's with all the cutting of the video?, terrible!
Do people not realize if you simply gave people like capablanca and morphy just a bit of time to study modern theory, they’d be at the top today? Think about it, they got their chess skill without the shit we have today. Can you imagine how strong they might be if they were given the opportunity to remove their weaknesses in theory with modern knowledge? Shit, I’d go far to say that if you put all the greatest players of all time (including the ones we have today) in a chess960 tournament, the guys in the past would come out on top!!!!
you're absolutly right ... the talent Capa and Paul had was just so up there ... modern theory is just something to learn ... i bet if they were alive they'd be top 5
The strongest chess player of HIS DAY wasn't strong? Certainly an Arrogant title, especially now that top level chess players are on "Chess Engine Steroids" comparatively. It's easy to use a chess computer and memorize lines and refutations... which is what prompted Bobby Fischer to challenge all of these so called GM's to "Random Chess" (Chess 960)... With no theory to memorize and no computer to act as Steroids, let's see who's "Strong" then.
When does the director's cut with the bonus footage come out?
Never... and you'll like it!
What's up with the weird cuts?
More Ben Finegold videos. Because he aint boring.
There should be a video with just a compilation of the cuts.
Morphy was light years ahead of *ANY* available competition of his time.Or, I suspect, of anything other than the silicone based of today.
One of the many great things about Ben's lectures is that he never says the annoyingly overused phrase 'a move like'. Not even when there is more than one option for the move. You would never catch him saying something like 'The ruy lopez begins with a move like e4'.
20:41 this joke has Norm MacDonald written all over it.. LOVE YOU GRANDMASTER FINEGOLD (very suspicious)
remember when Norm said to Adam Eget "That's the college you went to, right? If I remember correctly, to study animal husbandry... oh no that was your hobby. 😂you fkn animal"
Simply amazing! One of the best lessons of Ben! He was really in the mood ^) THANKS!!
Yeah he had great energy during this one.
The Wright brothers weren't very good airplane builders or the best pilots, either. But at the time they were simply the best.
Morphy 2100 in 1850....inflation would make that about 2700 in 2016.
Exactly, most players think that the rating system is absolute. Imagine their distress when I point out otherwise and when they google it they find I am correct.
How about Capablanca, do we have an inflationary rating for him?
It's estimated that Capablanca would be 2877 :)
The FIDE ratings were already inflating at a slow rate before Arpad Elo left. After he left, it was in 1985 I think, then the ratings really started to inflate quickly. If you converted Fischer's rating from after he destroyed Taimanov, Larsen, and Petrosian to now it would probably be about equal to Carlsen's.
Well he didn't really destroy Petrosian but he clearly dominated him in the match. Taimanov and Larsen he beat 6-0, that's unbelieveable. After Fischer won the world championship he quit competing. Maybe he would have increased his playing strength even more who knows?
I think Fischer is the strongest player to have played the game... not even just on the board but psychologically as well. Man could fuck you up lol
Ben is epic and best ever. I would like to see 1 O'clock class with Ben
Kids asking Ben what is 2100, what is Paul Morphy, what is chess...........
Ben Winegold!!!!
As Always Superb! Thanks GM Ben Finegold for another OUTSTANDING lesson!~ I enjoy All of your videos, you are GREAT!
Ben, please don't pay attention to what some people say. Your lectures are always very instructive mixed with sharp humour... So, keep up a good work!!! BTW, I entirely agree with you, Paul Morphy was the greatest player ever lived.
Excellent lecture! Paul Morphy was a beast! Surely he had to be a strong GM even by today's standards.
Morphy is so brilliant it’s hard to even comprehend his strategies. Much less coming up with them on your own... blindfolded.
16:30 White gain time Black try bf6 idea theory ıf Black play bf6 White need play Qd2 other moves intersting too
17:00 this move popular by some masters it's book move
After f6 Black have very bad bishop too
I'd bet money that in the bit after 6:30 that got censored, he said something like: "and that's why you guys vote for trump, because you think you're in the center, but you're actually to the right. "
Wow! never seen Ben Simon work so hard, it was like watching zombie Finegold!
I'm fairly sure the orders must have come from the top. Mr. Sinquefield has some pretty sensitive political issues ;)
He has issues, period.
liam314 its because the owner of the chess club is also local head of his KKK chapter. it doesn't get more alt-right, neo-con than that. so obviously anything that isn't a nazi salute or strictly relating to chess is edited out.
The UA-cam subtitles have you as "been fine goal" Hahaha
We need an uncensored version....
"Paul Morphy is not strong" about as accurate as "Ben Feingold is not fat".
This is Ben's best video
Ben is the most entertaining chess teacher on the internet. Truth hurts!
Considering former World Champion Bobby Fischer, who had the greatest 1-year performance rating in history, considered Morphy the greatest player of all time, I don't think anyone has to "refute" the bad claim he wouldn't be a master today. In my younger days, I was on the edge of a master rating (2116, 2200 = master), and I was amazed at some of moves Morphy made when reviewing his games.
Another excellent video, Ben. Thanks for using your wit, sarcasm, and charm to the fullest to lay waste to such a silly idea. Excellent presentation, in general. Cheers!
Don't censor GM Ben Finegold please
The saltiness is real! I love it! Welcome back, GM Finegold! :D
Thank you Mr Finegold for the video and thanks to the team who produced it.
So glad Ben is back. The (chess) world is a very cold place without him.
blud thinks hes travis scott on till further notice
Do you remember crossing the border into Canada, with your father and brother, in the late 70s or early 80's? You played in weekend tournaments, at the downtown YMCA? We met at one of those tournaments.
I hate people who say things like Morphy wouldn't be a super gm or Bill Russell wouldn't be good in the current NBA. That shit's just crazy. Deep set fundamental knowledge will make someone competitive regardless of the era.
I LOVE YOU BEN FINEGOLD. You are the funniest chess commentator/videomaker on the whole internet. NEVER CHANGE
wow, i was actually getting a drink when Ben said somebody at home was getting a drink. Could hear him saying it in the background. Spooky..
I swear I was just reading this comment as Ben said somebody at home was getting a drink
Paul morphy is the goat... just look at the 2nd game he played bilndfolded at age 9!!!
Fischer and capablanca and anderson said that morphy was the goat🐐
I've noticed that in every Morphy game I've seen, Morphy had white and the player with black played a very dubious defense. So, maybe Morphy wasn't so great. Maybe his opponents just got a bad opening and were never able to recover from it. The competition back then wasn't even close to what it is today (or even to what it was 50 years ago). Heck, I could probably even beat some of those guys that Morphy beat. It's possible that Morphy was only around 2500 and his opponents were only around 1700 players.
It's not about how the opponent played it's about the skill of Morphy.
When Carlsen destroys weak players he still plays strong chess. The strength of the opponent is irrelevant.
Uncut version please. 😢
People that say morphy wasn't very good are typically lower rated gms and ims...and they say it because they have an ego and overestimate their own abilities and downplay players from the past. If you'll notice, super gms almost always praise morphy. Don't ask what morphy would do today, ask what the people who say he isn't very good would do in morphys days...they would get crushed
Ben, good to know you read the comments!! nice. I learn a lot and have fun also with your videos!! :))
Is Ken West really a GM ? I hear Ben make fun of him every lecture.
A LOT of people need to learn to read. They don't know the meaning of:
Paul Morphy is Not Strong: The Refutation.
You're the best-est, Ben! Loved the video. :)
Ben's at it again! Hell yeah