Q & A with Dr. Joe Boot: Religious Plurality & Theonomy [July 2024]

It's that time of the month again! It's time for another Q&A with Dr. Joe Boot. This month Dr. Mike Thiessen asks Dr. Joe Boot your questions. Tune in as they discuss the religious character of culture and the religious foundation for law & politics.
Got Questions? Would you like to hear Dr. Boot answer your questions? Let us know in the comments or reach out to us at www.ezrainstit...
Think biblically about politics with the help of Dr. Boot's latest book "Ruler of Kings": ezrapress.ca/p...
For Ezra's many print resources and to join our newsletter, visit: ezrapress.com.
Stay up-to-date with all things Ezra Institute: www.ezrainstit...;
Subscribe to Ezra's UA-cam Channel: / @ezrainstitutecc
Fight Laugh Feast Network: pubtv.flfnetwo...
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple...
Spotify Podcast: open.spotify.c....
Wherever you find our content, please like, subscribe, rate, or review it; it truly does help.

[@natedogg333_]

Thank you Brothers!
Love you!

[@holygrailbjj]

I love the cup of Joe episodes! Thank you brothers!

[@Mattchew2232]

Cup of Joe, here we go!

[@gregb6469]

Another writer whose works many will find most helpful is Gordon Clark.

[@MichaelPetek]

My answer to the question about religious pluralism is that Freemasonry in particular cannot licitly be tolerated, because it usurps the prerogative of public authority in the administration of promissory oaths and is on this account seditious.
Sharia councils are innocuous only to the extent that they function as arbitral bodies in matters lawfully settled out of court. But in so far as they claim the public power of ruling proper to ministers of God, with the consequent obligation of obedience, they are at least seditious. As soon as the Muslim community claims the use of force as it's own resource for the enforcement of Islamic law, it ceases to be a religious community and becomes instead a political and belligerent community engaging the law of treason.
In what concerns the suppression of homosexuality, it may be more important to supress the heresy of homosexualism and to impose the severest penalties on those who persist in maintaining it.