LCA Tejas Mk1A | What they mean to the Indian Air Force | हिंदी में
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 сер 2024
- This is a video on LCA Tejas Mk1A | What they mean to the Indian Air Force
#defence #IAf #tejas #mk1A
Website: thedefencematr...
Discord Link: / discord
Instagram Link: / defence_matrix
Twitter: / defencematrix1
Music : Art of Silence - by Uniq" is under a Creative Commons license (Creative Commons - International Recognition 4.0 - CC BY 4.0)
Intro Music : Credit Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
*FAIR USE*
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Don't know what the top brass of IAF thinks but at present moment Tejas MK 1A is a saviour of IAF, in every way it is modern, safer, and better than Mig-21 in modern times(not discrediting it but it's just an old machine), firstly it is indigenous, better engine, better availability, better range, better avionics, better weapons payload, etc...IAF needs to place more orders for Tejas MK1A...numbers matter.
Koi mk 2 ki baat kyu nhi ker rha 😢
@@jashanpreetsingh3512 needs time to cook but in big numbers Mk1A with datalink is lethal
And NO CRASHES upto date
It is a better replacement for jaguar and mig21 .a 10 sq of mk1A can be a saviour for 1. Arresting sq strength .2.replace all vintage junks saving pilot life.3.gives time for Tejas mk2.
@@nikhilanandhegde4781 Mk1A has no crashes because there are like 3 in existence and they're prototypes
They are important to IAF because they make our baseline aircrafts good enough for multirole combat..
Unfortunately their order should have been placed 3 years earlier...
True..
I wonder when Delivery of Mk2 will start??
I have left MMRCA/MRFA for my retirement plan..as it's not gonna happen before that.😊
I think sir that this fighter will serve essentially as a quite disposable but advanced fighters that can provide baseline defence capabilities to strategic locations. Given the numbers, I think It can make a great fighter for defencive formations while greatly complimenting more capable platforms like Sukhoi, Rafael, etc for offensive roles.
In IAF may be ISI have a deep asset
@@SevvanaLikith Yes these can serve as point defence and ground attack supported by Flankers at the rear end whereas Rafale (and Tejas Mk2 in future) can perform Omnirole and attack functions
This video lucidly explains the importance for the timely conclusion of The LCA Mk2/MWF project. Potentially we could induct 200 of the Mk2 iteration
This is exactly why upgrading the SU-30MKI fleet to the maximum is extremely important. China is going to deploy a massive fleet of flankers against us. Other than SU-30MKI all our other platforms require external fuel tank. This not only reduces actual payload but also limits flight performance.
Pakistan will deploy a massive number of jf17s
@@Hinduslovecowpiss But that's like Mig21 in quality and worse than Tejas in carrying capacity.
The Mk1A will be as important as the Rafale, albeit with very different objective.. what happened in 2019, will be the nature of most conflicts we’ll engage in.. in addition, 500 kms range is excellent for point defence, especially scrambling roles at border airfields..
On all our border airfields, there are 2 fighters in the highest operational readiness 24x7x365 .. ready to take off in 2 mins flat.!! Tejas fits the role perfectly.
These are to provide cover against the first wave of attack, giving time to the others to execute the counter attack ..
If the Tejas can carry 4 Astra and 2-4 Asraam in the air to air mode, it’ll whoop the shit outta enemy fighters … unless of course, an SU 35 gets close enough for a dog fight
You should visit Jaisalmer airforce station … if you’re lucky enough, you’ll spot 2 Mig 29s, armed to their teeth, and ready to be airborne in 2 mins flat .!!
Civilians can spot these, if you’re smart enough to identify .. and spot from a distance .. at least that was possible 15 years ago
These are point-defense fighters and can be refueled in the air when needed. There are always some sacrifices to be made. What makes me happy is that in the hands of a well-trained pilot, this aircraft is worth its weight in gold.
Intended to be a point defence jet...but the kind of capability it brings ..it will be a superb multirole fighter with limited range/endurance ....IMO it should be deployed on Pakistan bordering airbases like Srinagar whose distance from Islamabad is less than 200km then it can definitely prove it be more than a match for any jet currently in Pak inventory....near LAC we can deploy for interception and air patrol....this goes very well in line with NWNP doctrine of IAF
Tejas mk1a - against pakistan .... Is best choice
With weapon package -
2 astra mk2
1 meteor
2 short range missile
1 drop tank - 750 km range
1 jdam
Combat RADIUS is wrongly mentioned as combat RANGE. Tejas's combat RADIUS on internal fuel is 500 kms with 2 kgs payload(approx).
Means it can travel 500 kms, complete its mission and come back to base, on internal fuel.
Combat RADIUS can increase or decrease depending on mission. If Tejas mk1A carries its complete 4 tons of weapons and have to go for lo-lo operation, its combat RADIUS will come down to 300 kms.
If it carries 2 Drop tanks and 2 tons weapons payload, its combat RADIUS can go upto 800 kms.
Its ferry range on internal is around 1700 kms. Means it can go from point A to point B with no weapons payload and can cover 1700 kms+ in suitable flight conditions.
Its Ferry range with 3 x drop tanks is around 2500 kms+.
@@Parrot3054 look up on google "LCA Tejas Gets Initial Operational Clearance for Induction into IAF Press release"
The statement i quote from there is "LCA Tejas is capable of flying non- stop to destinations over 1700 km away (Ferry Range). It's Radius of Action is upto 500 km depending upon the nature and duration of actual combat."
I think Tejas mk1a will have higher than 500km which is of Tejas mk1.
Since the jet is 300-400kg lighter and have extra internal fuel capacity. Combination of these two will increase the combat radius by at least by 5-10%
Which is about 600km atleast. Which is decent for an LCA
Almost similar to Gripen.
@@direwolf7491 we can confirm that after Tejas mk1A production model roles out in 2024.
And Tejas mk1's combat radius is almost similar to Gripen C already now.
@@rohitb5834 That's one of the reasons I think Gripen has no chance in the MRFA. We already have Tejas mk1a and we are making the Tejas mk2 which will be of the class of Gripen E.
So Gripen doesn't really make sense for the IAF.
@@direwolf7491 offcourse, Tejas mk1 is similar to Gripen C in every parameter, and Tejas mk1A is better than Gripen C, yet cheaper.
Tejas Mk1A in 6-8 Squadrons is perfect modern replacement for Mig21 & even Jaguar DARIN2 (outperform in terms of range, engine, capability, radar) especially with Uttam AESA & it's attack performance in airforce exercises
While Mk2 in 8-10 Squadron will be perfect to replace Mig29, Mirage, Jag Darin3. Need timely delivery for Mk1A & National importance to Mk2 development
LCA Tejas inception was to replace the Mig-21 providing point defense CAP's, it does it better with close combat capability and faster climb rate, it excels in it.
Moreover, LCA gives a good short range Omni role unlike Mig-21 which is terrible at ground and marine scenarios.
We're also addressing the short range of LCA MK1 with MK2, AMCA for Medium to Long-range Omni Roles, which will replace, Jags, Mirages and Su-30s
Tejas MK1A is a great fighter for air defense and that is the role of Mig 21 which it is about to replace very soon. India should make medium and heavy-weight dual-engine fighters with the intention of improving them over time.
Drdo and Hal should also work on indigenous air superiority twin engine fighter. We all know tejas is not going to be pure dogfighter, it is more of a strike or defensive aircraft. But what will matter in future is our own air superiority fighter. I don't know what we achieved by designing world's lightest aircraft in these many years. Other countries use these type of aircraft for training purposes. But Drdo has now good experience in avionics, bvr, radars and other electrical components.
We need a video on Tejas mk 2.
Specifications and time line
By knowing timeline what you will do?
Bro usse accha 2000 ka note change karvale
I think sir that this fighter will serve essentially as a quite disposable but advanced fighters that can provide baseline defence capabilities to strategic locations. Given the numbers, I think It can make a great fighter for defencive formations while greatly complimenting more capable platforms like Sukhoi, Rafael, etc for offensive roles.
I want the capacity to increase by 50. This will help in catering to domestic and international order. Further, in case of any misadventures by our neighbors it can be countered easily. Strategically and economically also a prudent move..
Tejas mk2 is needed ASAP . Mk1a won't suffice . We meed mk2 in large numbers . Mwf with smaller RCS and modern weapons and avionics is the way forward . And we need that mrfa to be executed somehow with atleast 4 more sqad of rafales
Sir make video on Tejas mk2 capabilities like it's lifting weight etc....
Tejas to take over Mig21 and Jaguars.
Need another 50.
it has 6 hardpoints, 3 on each wing and one in center. two for drop tank, 1 for aspj pod, 2 bvr missile and one for 2 wvr missile. even for an endurance of 56 min it is a little low. they should have added one more pylon on each wing tip.
Why to add 2 drop tanks ...to reduce maneuverability and increasing rcs.....better to have one drop tank at center and rest be used to carry weapons.... It can decimate any Pak fighter...
One central and one wing fuel tank is enough.
With ASPJ you have 4 pylons left . 2 will carry 2 BVR. 2 WILL CARRY 2+1 WVR.
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
is video se ye sabit hota hai ki
ham duniya se 30 saal piche chal rahe hain
It should come with dual pylon for BVR missles too
2 bvr missles aren't enough, that's the only flaw i see. Other than that since the production has been ramped up to 24 per year, it can be further increased to 28 or even 32 per year, in absence of any foreign orders these should be used as well for indigenous orders and IAF should procure additional 3 squadrons of tejas mk1a since mk2 and MRFA is nowhere in near future and will take time
5 x BVR missiles
2 x WVR missiles
1 x SPJ
1 x Litening pod
Decent for a Light combat aircraft in a Air defence/interceptor role.
Not enough wing width. So it's not possible. Sorry to break it for you.
Systems like S400 negate the need for point defense fighters like Mig21 and Tejas.
Tejas is a good fighter but irrelevant in modern battlefield.
IAF and DRDO need to focus on developing and inducting S400 type systems with range upto 1000 kms keeping in mind the vast Tibetan plateau and India's massive coastline.
IAF needs its version of TEDBF before AMCA matures and joins the fleet.
Atleast Tejas is far far better than MiG-21s.
No. Not at all.
Do people think that if you place a SAM somewhere, the area is automatically out of bounds for the enemy?
Do you know that SAMs aren't switched on 24/7? Because doing that will just get your SAMs detected by the enemy and there'll soon be an anti-radiation missile or a drone barrelling towards you, taking out your entire prized SAM system.
Intercepting stuff using SAMs is a game of cat and mouse.
Why we still need a point defense fighter. Don't forget that our armed forces are purely a defensive force.
I don't think u understand how Sam systems work
@Kenshi there are other ways to detect aerial targets other than radar.
Radar draws attention to self which is harmful. But passive sensors are immune to anti radiation missiles and bombs.
Ukraine has hardly any air force to talk about but Russia has failed to gain air superiority over the Ukrainian skies. There must be some system in Ukraine which is preventing the powerful Russian air force.
SAM ain't enough bro. Earth is not flat. Radar coverage of lower altitudes keeps reducing with distance. We do need Fighter jets.
Heyy Defence Matrix Compare Indian Mirage 2000 with Pakistani mirage 3&5..
Better Radar, better engine and better weapons suite more payload capacity. Mirage 3 and 5 are ancient in modern day while 2000 is still used by france
They gave them a ROSE upgrade but given how old the airframe is, doubt its enough
@@dlff5327 😂 but not than 93000 cowards breakfast, vaise dusra Banda kidhar hai
@@dlff5327 even the MiG-21 has a better radar and the R-77 has a longer range then the Within visual range stuff the old mirages have. You can't depend on the JF-17s because of the engines and now the fact that you have to depend on the mirages is sad. Welp who cares, you don't even have a budget to finance a war so I would worry about paying the crew who run those systems.
@zorawar.. meteor has a longer range then PL-15 and good luck flying the JF-17s without spares. You still use unupgraded J-7s in a huge no while we only have like 50 21's. J-10s are a knockoff IAI Lavi which is a 30 year old design and uses reverse engineered soviet engines, goodbye combat range and features like supercruise. Also have fun using older F-16s with limited stores of AMRAAMS, might have to jerryrig some chinese missiles on it that is if you have that money or daddy china might loan you some.
First
Jai Hind 🇮🇳
There should be more order of Mk1A to replace Mig21 immediately
should be Tj MK2
What's the logic will they deliver mk 1 a immediately?
Yes ahead of schedule
HAL agar samay se itna aage hai to 2028 kisne dekha ...ye 2024 wala isi saal 2023 k November tak pahla bs pahla deliver kar de ..kafi hai hm bhi dekh lenge kaisa hai mk1a
.har roz ek se ek nya bayan aata h HAL drdo IAF Army govt of india ka
Seem to have forgotten about aerial refueling, and Su-30MKI mounted buddy refueling pods for range extension without drop tanks. Clean combat radius is calculated without refueling at altitude. The real limitation is MTOW (max takeoff weight). Range can be extended with refueling.
Which targeting pod will be integrated?
Actually 50 squadrons should be ready to war ASAP in IAF we are always late and behind the schedule. China and Pakistan will not wait till the IAF is ready with 50 SQ ready to fly and ready to WAR 😢
India should keep producing mk1a till the time mk2 joins IAF because number matters in any exams
@krishnajirao:
If HAL goes on making the Mk-1A, they'll go slow on Mk-2 prototypes.
As far as they're concerned, they're making money
Kuchh limitations nhi hay, fuselage drop tank with Tanker Aircraft refulling is enough. Wings will only have Weapons.
What about DIRCM??
Waiting for the Government to declare some big defense projects and pacts before election of 2024. Hoping for submarine and fighter deals.
Can tejas fighter detect and killed J20 and J16 ?
Kab induct hote he pta ni hum to sunte-2 thak gae
Kab mk1 kab mk2 aega kab amca ka prototype dikhega
जय हो❤
Induction of Tejas MK1A means, Indian Air Force can retire Mig 21. Too many precious lives are lost because of flying this vintage machine. This will bring an end to it.
Could you please shed some light on conformal fuel tanks options for Tejas. Thanks
Laser warning receivers, aur Missile approach early warning systems are quite obviously two avionics that are 'must have' in modern air combat, moreso in point defence. Hurried acquisition is fine, just let's not be hasty and make arrangements for future incorporation at the very least
I guess a payload combination of 1 Fuel Tank (Center line tank- 850 L) along with 4 BVR & 2 WVR would be ideal for Tejas. The 8th pylon to be used for external Self Protection Jammer since in Modern Warfare, EW plays a major role, so Tejas needs to protect itself in a Jamming environment.
If Dual Rack pylons are used for WVR, then even better. It will increase the payload to 4 BVR & 4 WVR.
This way Tejas will get a Combat Range of around 750 kms which would be enough for a Point (or Area) Defence Fighter as well as retain it's combat skills enough to deter the enemy till further aid comes in the form of Rafale, Su 30MKI & Mig 29UPG.
For point defence/interceptor role, no drop tank is needed.
So basically it can do - 4 x Asrram , 4 x Astra , 1 x SPJ in interception mode with no problem. Maybe even 1 more BVR under the belly. In such configeration, its combat range will be over 1000 kms even with maneuvers. so no problem.
In Balakot type strike, it still wont need a drop tank either
5 x Jdam/Hammer, 2 x Asraam, 1 x SPJ, 1 x litening pod
It would need drop tanks for -
Long duration CAP roles
2 x Drop tank, 1 x SPJ, 1 X litening pod, 2 WVR , 3 x BVR
or Deep penetration bombing
2 x drop tank , 1x Litening pod, 4 x Jdam/Hammer, 2 x WVR
India's military Goal is Defence...✋✋✋,
With that approach,Tejas MK1A is the Only,very important 🔥🔥🔥 Fighter jet , which IAF must order in 150+ numbers 😐😐,
Tejas is modern built,..IAF,HAL can integrate Every Future Weapons, radar ,EW system on the same MK1A jet when ever it needed in future,
Tejas can Become back one of Air borne defence and even Careu out medium level Attacks
Tejas 😂😂😂
@@ns_8058 yes Tejas,
It's 21st century fighter jet, Which is highly reliable,no crash till date...,
@@warrior_singh111 then why no other country buying it? Even iaf was reluctant.
No crash bcz how many Tejas are operational and how many of them are deployed on forward bases.
Tejas is waste of time and money of taxpayer.
Jai ho
I'm first... Give me hilal e pakistan now
Abay chutiya wo teri aukat sai zada mehnga meddle hai tera pura ghr aur tera pura khaandaan bik jai ga tub be wo medal lainay ke teri aukat nhi hai chutiya bairoozgar hindustani
Hina rabbani khar degi aa kr tujhe
Did you mean hila-le- Pakistan?
Bilawal ko b same award deti hai na wo 😂
Who suggested small size aircraft
Have to concentrate on Tejas Mk2 and AMCA MK1 .
Investing more in AMCA avionics will help Tejas MK2 .
Instead of more MK1A we need all weapons integrated on it at the earliest. Ordering more number of Tejas MK2 is better.
If we add more tejas.. That will complete our squadron ...numbers matters bro 🙌🙌🙌🙌..side by side.. We can buy 5th generation tooo
Can you compare MK 1A with f20 tiger shark? Thinking that without using composites , if f20 can have such a low weight then why after 30 years using composites MK1A is heavy when compared? Not sure why HAL is trying to make new design for HLFT 42 , they can license F20 Tigershark design from Northrop Grumman and use cheap Kaveri engine there. These are just my opinions
What will be the survivability without MAWS?
It should be provided internally.
I thinl Tejas mk1a will be a descent fighter aircraft considering that it can carry astra mk1 and mk2 with rcs of just 0.5m2 and for ground attack we can equip it with scalp and bramhos ng also not to forget that we also can integrate rudram 2 and 3
Can we go supersonic with those thicc faced drop tank?
Additional orders presently is mere speculation.
GOI should have HAL/TATA/L&T manufacture at a very. rapid rate. They should use conformal fuel tanks instead of drop tanks. The only we can counter China is by have more thank 1000 HAL Tejas.
Iaf k visinor, planer thinker bhut poor hai ,even deffence k bare m joo aam admi bhi thodda bhut knowledge rakhta hai uskoo bhi pta hai kiss Tarah k aircraft ki jaroorat hai kya upgrade programe m hona chhiye .
With better availability of technologies the concept of point air defence, area air defence, theatre air defence are moving towards redudancy, for example s-400 has 4 to 5 types of sensors and missiles which can be used for point /area/theater air defence systems, now same goes for combat aircrafts thier roles can be interchanged based on thier configurations.
But Sir Air Marshal, radars can't give 100% area coverage in mountainous regions and LRSAMs are ineffective against low flying targets. Not to mention you'll be arse over tits if your radars go bust. I hope you get my point sire.
@@shenanigans4177 what I have said is the distinction between point/area/theatre airdefence systems be it be ground based airdefence systems or air based airdefence systems(combat aircrafts) are blurring due to advance in technology nowhere have I said combat aircrafts are not necessary.
@@shenanigans4177 when I say technology is a great enabler which blurs the distinction
1) for example previously because of small nose cone smaller aircrafts had less powerful radars but improvement in technology even smaller aircrafts have better radars and to add to that they have good data links which enable them to over come the liability of having less powerful radars.
Point defence if Moto hai Tejas MK-1 and MK-1A ka toh range ki chinta kyu karni hai.
air force ko gradually MIG-29 UPG fleet ko retire karna chahiye 2024 onwards . . . full avionics & ECM upgrade sirf Dassault Mirage 2000-9 EH multi role air dominance fighter aur Sepecat Jaguar DARIN III multi role ground attack fighter par karna chahiye . . . Tejas Mk2A multi role interdictor strike fighter ki introduction & induction into the air force has to be expedited by atleast 2 years . . . kamse kam FOC standard ki Tejas Mk2A air force mein 2026 tak induct kar de for further evaluation & trials . . .
What if it carries 1 central drop tank and takes off with lesser fuel more weapons and tops up by airborne refueling?
India shoul opt for single engine fighter jets
Hey @DefenceMatrix, you yourself denied this 500 km combat radius claim in one of your previous videos. And now you are using the same combat range data in this video. I don't understand it.
Please show the video where we denied 500km combat radius of Tejas, if that’s the case then the mistake is from our end
@@DefenceMatrix Sorry, my mistake. It was a video from AD not yours.
And also this comment was not targeted at you. I just wanted to confirm.
Please make a video on tejas mark 2 capabilities and whether it is better then Rafael or not
Channel ki membership le uske baad sochenge video ka
Lca tejas + Dual rack pilon = midium weight fighter jet ke lag bhag barabar fight dega. j10 ke jo advantage hai wo ghat jaye ga
Alvida MIG-21 ......and new India welcomes TEJAS MK1-A........these are better than any mig and must be deployed along Radcliffe line......Pakistan k liye kafi hain and rest should concentrate on CHinese
Forget migs tejas rafales are future
When we knew that Tejas cant carry more fuel internally, why was this issue not addressed in Tejas MK-1A. It may be most advanced, but it is clear that some the drawbacks have not been fixed. When you have found that there is an issue to be fixed, you will have to fix, otherwise why do we need the Mk-1A. The same holds good for every other industry for that matter, We have seen many single engine fighters, I agree we have built Tejas from the scratch, but we cant stop fixing small small things. Why should we expect any kind of excuses or sympathy for Tejas or Tejas MK-1A
Super sukaoi/ su35 ka barama kuc boliya 🙏🇮🇳 su 30 mki
Jai shree Sita Ram Hanuman 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🎉 🇮🇳🎉🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
moral of the story, Size Matters
Can't we have conformal fuel on Tejas??
You have misinterpreted Combat radius of 500 km as Combat range in the entire video. Ferry range of Tejas is 2000Km+. Combat radius is of 500 km which is more than sufficient for the whole of western neighbour and theater level of northern neighbour. Is your analysis deliberately mischievous or just ignorance?
finally someone corrected him!
Yes that’s combat radius thanks for the correction. But it’s still less and expected for this size or category of an aircraft. Good point defence fighter it is, as mentioned in the video.
@@DefenceMatrix 500 km combat radius is not point defence. Especially with mid air refueling. Can run multiple circles around western neighbour within that radius.
@@sreeharsha1828t’s not that easy, if it was then IAF would have gone for a bigger order to even replace the MiG 29s with Tejas Mk1A as it is superior to them in avionics. Range and payload limitations exists that’s why IAF waiting for a bigger MWF Mk2 platform.
@@DefenceMatrix which scenario do you picture where a 3 ton+ payload has to be delivered by a single plane beyond 500kms? They are surely better than Jaguar "deep penetration fighters " which have a fading pair of engines which take kms of runway to just takeoff. Fact remains Mk 1As can easily do a Balakot. Their order is limited because ordering them in higher number it is akin to IAF eating it's hard.
But if the case is point defence then would you say the same about Gripen C
its similar, yes
First 43 ki order delivery ho gyi kya
IAF babu, hal babu, ministry babu sab ek se ek hain kam koi nahi, in sabhi ka yogdan hai jet ki kamo me
Why are you trying to voice over like salman khan. 😊
👍🏼
Endurance is very low only 57 minutes. A serious issue
Will Tejas mk 1 will get upgraded to mk1a in future?
yes
We should've made the Tejas Mk 2 from the beginning Light fighter doesn't make sense
nope. We use light fighters pretty well in combat. We used the HAL Ajeet/Gnat fighters effectively in 1965 war. We used the Mig-21 superbly in the 1971 war.
HAL pe Bharosa nahi jab tak deliver nahi karta
PLEASE FRIENDS make the slogan voice of our nation::::: KOHINOOR COME BACK..KOHINOOR ENGLAND CHODO🎉
Nice slogan ❤️
Badle me RR engines TOT denge 100kN ka, to bhi chelega.
@@desibigfoot3874 khud bna lenge bhai...agr fund right time pr right kaam k liye mil jaye. Waha bhi to indian scientist hi bna rhe h.
तेजस और jf17 में लगभग बराबर इंटरनल फ्यूल आता है । फिर कंबैक्ट रेंज में इतना अंतर क्यों है😏😏
JF 17 combat radius is fake on Wikipedia
Teju kab deliver hoga aor delivery charges kiya hongay??
Jitne bhi charges hoge JUNK fighter se thode zada hi hoge because quality bhi to metter karti he 😂😂😂😂😂
🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Delivery charges nahi lenge unhone bola hai atta aur tamatar lenge Bhikhario ko Dene ke liye.
Jf17 block 3 vs tejas mk1
kaun sa fighter jet best Hai bhai?
Mk1A ya Mk1 ?
@@fly463 mk1a vs jf17 block 3
@@Rajusk-
Mk1A any day
Better RCS , better BVR missiles(meteor) , better radar , EW suite etc
Jf 17 has more capabilities it can also carry some atta and tamatar. And with jf17 block 1 you get 5 hoors with jf17 block 2 you get 10 hoors and with jf17 block3 you get 30 hoors.
Jf17 is great deal atta+ tamatar+ hoors.
enjoy enjoy enjoy
Hopefully size limitations mk2 me nahi hoge
Agr agr agr agr ......pr pr pr pr .........🤐🤐
They mean nothing to IAF . A bird in the hands is more worth than one in the bushes.
Tejas Mk 1 A is the answer to Air Force any potential push to procure Mig 29 from shitty Russia
Itna late bhai, kyu.
It has better radar than Rafale RBE2 because RBE2 only 860 TR modules while Uttam AESA has 960 TR module and I should add that Rafale radar is also Galium arsenide so same as Tejas
Are you crazy?? It doesn't work like that..
Rafale is also a Twin engine aircraft so more power to radar..
Also France has been making Radars and engines before India even thought of Making a radar..
It's not just T/R modules that makes a radar.
Tujhe sab pata hai radar ke baare mein hmm. 3-4 video dekhne baad Gyan pelega tu. Kabhi cockpit dekhi bhi hai.
@@ns_8058 ha cockpit dekha Kiya DCS mein ura ta bhi hu just keliye cockpit mein sit karna parta hein
@@ns_8058 Sale tujhe kitna commission milta hein be Dassualt Aviation aur Thales se
@@rajatdani619 hopefully you won't have the odesity to say now that Rafale is better than J 20
What is the status of BVR missiles integration with Tejas 1A... Last I checked, this bird fired Python-5..
Must be Astra mk 1 and mk 2
@@SS-hh3tk This is the biggest confusion. I think, Astra is not interested with Tejas.
@@lavaniasbylines2565 why
Can't we use conformal fuel tank
Tu hal join karle yha UA-cam mein comment karke kya ukhad lega. Desh ko tere jaise defence scientist aur inventor ki jarurat hai.
Tu aajse kaam chalu kar 7th generation fighter jet pe.😂😂😂
But yaar RR to engine acche bnati h
India need Rafale ASAP
This mosquito will sting🎉
Cant we increase the internal fuel tank ?
Tejas has enough range of 1700 kms+ on internal fuel .
Bro can you make a fuel tank at home and then supply it to HAL??
Why can't we use Conformal fuel tanks in our Tejas Mk1a ?
Why you need conformal fuel tanks??? Buddy refueling by SU-30MKI can be done.
@@ciamodikabaap3980 bro , like what ?
Why use air refueling or drop tanks when you can have more fule with just some little changes?
@@randmht9976 little change will increase the weight & decrease maneuverability. US modified its F-16 & F-15 engines to balance the weight of the aircraft.
@@ciamodikabaap3980 the increase in weight and the decrease in maneuverabitly will be negligible Compared to the weiyof drop tanks & the drag they degenerate.
Too much drag for such small plane and engine.
Having israeli radar l on tejas led us to buy more israeli wepons then indeginious ones😢
Why our defence system wasted time money on Light fighters, light helicopter and medium stealth fighter is beyond logical reasoning. The Same money could've been used to purchase SU 30 mki and it's TOT to Indian rights, then Should have developed more advanced varient of fighters from that technology. Tejas is good only for stopping invasion but can't do anything outside it's limited range. Amca looks of same limited range too, good thing it's not in production and money, more importantly time wasted on it . Chinese chowmin is one thing but making a bhelpuri is another. IAF should plan as our Navy has done with wasting time or money to get the most powerful important equipment for National defence. ☝️😏
its defensive aircraft not an offensive